Research Article Volume 17 Issue 3
Nursing Department, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Oromia, Asella, Ethiopia
Correspondence: Lidiya Tekle Gebreyohannes, Nursing Department, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Oromia, Asella, Ethiopia
Received: May 30, 2021 | Published: June 24, 2024
Citation: Wake AD, Gebreyohannes LT. Hypertension complications: common complications, awareness and associated factors in hypertensive patients in Ethiopia: multicenter cross sectional study. J Cardiol Curr Res. 2024;17(3):67-74. DOI: 10.15406/jccr.2024.17.00607
Background: Hypertension (HTN) is one of the major risk factors of coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to assess common complications, awareness hypertension complications (HTNC) and associated factors in hypertensive patients.
Method: Cross-sectional survey was done on four hundred study participants at selected public hospitals in Arsi Zone (PHAZ) from March 10, 2019 to April 8, 2019. EpiData version 4.2.0.0 was used for data entry and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 was used for statistical analysis.
Results: The level of good awareness towards HTNC in study participants was 32.5% [95% confidence interval (CI); 28.3, 37.0]). Secondary education (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=3.95, 95% CI [2.33, 14.92]), higher education (AOR=4.37, 95% CI [2.57, 15.16]), employed (AOR=3.59, 95% CI [1.76, 17.77]), urban residents (AOR=1.68, 95% CI [1.47, 4.24]), monthly income of ≥ 3000 ETB (AOR=3.76, 95% CI [1.36, 10.43]), positive family history of HTN (AOR=2.14, 95% CI [1.92, 8.93]), duration of HTN > 10 years (AOR=2.41, 95% CI [1.81, 10.73]), health insurance (AOR=3.35, 95% CI [1.81, 10.48]), having comorbidities (AOR=1.73, 95% CI [1.55, 8.93]), non-smoker (AOR=1.72, 95% CI [1.35, 10.85]) and having regular health professional visit (AOR=8.20, 95% CI [5.31, 17.59]) were factors significantly associated with awareness of HTNC.
Conclusion: Awareness of HTNC among the study participants was low. There is a need to initiate programs that could create public awareness about HTNC. Educational level, occupation, residency, monthly income, family history of hypertension, duration of hypertension, health insurance, presence of comorbidities, current smoking status, and regular healthcare professional visits were factors significantly associated with awareness of HTNC.
Keywords: Awareness, Hypertension, Hypertension complications, Arsi zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; COR, crude odds ratio; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HTN, hypertension; HTNC, hypertension complications; PHAZ, public hospitals in Arsi Zone; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SSA, sub-saharan Africa; WHR, waist-hip ratio
Globally, hypertension (HTN) is a considerable health burden.1 It is a significant medical and community health problem,2 affecting about one billion people.3 It causes of morbidity and premature mortality in working-age individuals.4 It is a lethal disease due to its prevalence and the health consequences of uncontrolled HTN.5 HTN is a problem, which is not well controlled.6 It remains a health and economic burden irrespective of current upgrading in blood pressure (BP) control.7 It is a significant challenge and this situation should obtain high priority.8
Globally, hypertension complications (HTNC) cause around 9.4 million deaths each year. Three out of ten deaths occurred due to cardiovascular disease (CVD).9 Between 1990 and 2015, deaths related to elevated systolic (SBP) were also raised.10 HTN is one of the key risk factors for most of different CVD.11 It increases the development of heart failure and other adversative cardiovascular consequences.12
In Africa, HTNC such as stroke and heart failure are becoming increasing.13 The figure of resistant HTN in hypertensive person is 10–20% globally. It would lead to renal outcomes, cardiovascular, and death compared to nonresistant HTN.14 The prevalence of HTN is 37.4% in Ghana,15 46% in African region,16 35% in Nigeria,17 35% in Americas,16 and 28.1% in Haryana.18
In Ethiopia, HTN is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in the country,19 CVD mortality was 54.7%, and all-cause mortality was 53.4% as per 1990 to 2017 data report.20 Generally, that HTNC accounted for 11.3% of all medical admissions, 63.6% of them were stroke and 24.7% heart disease.21
The study done in China revealed that the prevalence of awareness was 23.6 to 56.2%.22 There were low levels of awareness of HTN in Africa.23 The compliance with antihypertensive medications was improved after an education about HTNC.24 The aim of this study was to determine HTNC, awareness of HTNC and associated factors among adult hypertensive patients.
Study area, period and design
The study was done in Arsi zone. Arsi Zone is one of the zones which is found in Oromia regional state and is located in the southeast of Ethiopia. Arsi Zone has around 3.5 million populations with 24 Woredas classified into 499 rural villages and 58 towns with 1 administrative town. Multisite cross-sectional survey was done from March 10, 2019 to April 8, 2019.
Source and study population
All hypertensive patients visited public hospitals in Arsi Zone (PHAZ) were source population and selected hypertensive patients were the study population.
Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria
≥18 years old patients and who were on follow-up ≥6 months and willing to participate were included. Severely ill patients and who were incapable to be interviewed were excluded.
Sample size determination, sampling technique and procedures
A complete survey or census was done on four hundred hypertensive patients visiting the selected four PHAZ, which were randomly selected from the seven public hospitals. The patient’s medical chart was reviewed on first stage of the study. Then, all patients who were presented at the study period were included in the study.
Study variables
Dependent variables
Awareness of HTNC.
Independent variables
Operational definitions
Awareness of HTNC: Was assessed by a yes or no response to each question raised on HTNC on target organs.25-27
Good awareness of HTNC: When patients respond the mean or above the mean score on awareness of HTNC on target organs questions.26
Poor awareness of HTNC: When patients respond below the mean score on awareness of HTNC on target organs questions.26
Data collection instrument and procedures
The questionnaire includes sociodemographic questions, questions on the health profile of the patients, questions on the source of information about hypertension, questions related to individual factors, and awareness of HTN questions. The questionnaire was adapted from relevant literature with modification fit to the local context.25-27 The questionnaire was prepared in English and translated to Afan Oromo and finally translated back to English to maintain consistency. A semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire and patients’ medical records review were used to collect data. Data was collected by 4 Bachelors of Science degree nurses and supervised by 2 Master of Science degree nurses.
Data quality control
Translation and retranslation was done keep the quality of the data. Two days training was given for data collectors and supervisors. The questionnaire was pretested on 5% of the sample size.
Data processing and analysis
EpiData version 4.2.0.0 was used for data entry and SPSS version 21.0 was used for statistical analysis. Multi-collinearity was tested and there was no sign of multicollinearity. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression was performed. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to find variables associated with awareness of HTNC. Crude odds ratio (COR) and AOR with the corresponding 95%CI used to show the association. Hosmer-Lemeshow’s goodness-of-fit test was used to determine the model fitness and the p-value = 0.321. Finally, variables with p-value <0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression were considered as statistically significant.
Sociodemographic characteristics
Four hundred participants were included and a response rate was 97.6%. 150 (37.5) of patients were aged 40 to 59 years (Table 1).
Variable |
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Age in years |
20-39 |
142 |
35.5 |
40-59 |
150 |
37.5 |
|
≥60 |
108 |
27.0 |
|
Gender |
Male |
225 |
56.2 |
Female |
175 |
43.8 |
|
Ethnicity |
Oromo |
282 |
70.5 |
Amhara |
87 |
21.8 |
|
Gurage |
27 |
6.7 |
|
Other |
4 |
1.0 |
|
Religion |
Orthodox |
187 |
46.7 |
Muslim |
159 |
39.8 |
|
Protestant |
51 |
12.7 |
|
Other |
3 |
0.8 |
|
Educational level |
No formal education |
79 |
19.7 |
Primary education |
179 |
44.8 |
|
Secondary education |
78 |
19.5 |
|
Higher education |
64 |
16.0 |
|
Marital status |
Single |
95 |
23.8 |
Married |
160 |
40.0 |
|
Divorced |
72 |
18.0 |
|
Widowed |
73 |
18.2 |
|
Occupation |
Farmer |
137 |
34.2 |
House wife |
80 |
20.0 |
|
Governmental employee |
96 |
24.0 |
|
Private business |
43 |
10.8 |
|
Unemployed |
44 |
11.0 |
|
Residency |
Urban |
242 |
60.5 |
Rural |
158 |
39.5 |
|
Average monthly income in Ethiopian Birr (ETB) |
≤ 999 |
127 |
31.8 |
1000-1999 |
79 |
19.7 |
|
2000-2999 |
60 |
15.0 |
|
≥ 3000 |
134 |
33.5 |
Table 1 Sociodemographic Characteristics of study participants who were Attending a selected PHAZ, Ethiopia (n=400)
Health profile related and individual related factors
Of the total participants’, more than one-third, 154 (38.5) of them had a family history of HTN. More than half 219(54.8) of them had ≤ 5 years of duration of HTN since diagnosis. A bit less than one-fourth 88 (22) of them had comorbidities. More than half 221(55.2) of them had no regular health professional visit.
From the participants’ who had a family history of HTN, the majority 76(49.4) of them had a good awareness regarding to HTNC and from those who had >10 years duration of HTN since diagnosis more than half 37(54.4) of them had a good awareness regarding HTNC. From those who had health insurance, nearly two-third 45(62.5) of them had a good awareness regarding HTNC. From those who had comorbidities, 38(43.2) of them had a good awareness regarding HTNC (Table 2).
Variables |
Category |
Response |
Awareness of HTNC |
|
Good |
Poor |
|||
N (%) |
N (%) |
N (%) |
||
Family history of HTN |
Present |
154 (38.5) |
76(49.4) |
78(50.6) |
Not sure |
104(26.0) |
26(25.0) |
78(75.0) |
|
Absent |
142(35.5) |
28(19.7) |
114(80.3) |
|
Duration of HTN since diagnosis in years |
≤ 5 |
219(54.8) |
57(26.0) |
162(74.0) |
6-10 |
113(28.2) |
36(31.9) |
77(68.1) |
|
> 10 |
68(17.0) |
37(54.4) |
31(45.6) |
|
Health insurance |
Yes |
72(18.0) |
45(62.5) |
27(37.5) |
No |
328(82.0) |
85(25.9) |
243(74.1) |
|
Presence of co-morbidities |
Yes |
88(22.0) |
38(43.2) |
50(56.8) |
No |
312(78.0) |
92(29.5) |
220(70.5) |
|
Current smocking status |
Yes |
65(16.2) |
15(23.1) |
50(76.9) |
No |
335(83.8) |
115(34.3) |
220(65.7) |
|
Regular professional visits |
Yes |
179(44.8) |
106(59.2) |
73(40.8) |
No |
221(55.2) |
24(10.9) |
197(89.1) |
Table 2 Health Profile related, Source of Information related and Individual related factors Among study participants Attending at Selected PHAZ, Ethiopia (n=400)
Patients Sources of Information about HTNC
Regarding to the source of information about HTN, the majority 120(92.30) of them receive information from health professionals, 60(46.15) of them from mass media, 31(23.85) of them from Books, 56(43.08) of them from family members, and 29(22.31) of them get information about the HTNC from their friends (Figure 1).
Figure 1 Source of information about the disease for study participants attending at selected PHAZ, Ethiopia.
Awareness towards HTNC on target organs
About (42%) of the participants were aware that HTN could prone them to heart disease. Only (20%) of the participants were aware that HTN could prone them to kidney disease (Figure 2).
Figure 2 Patients’ awareness towards HTNC on target organs among study participants attending at selected PHAZ, Ethiopia.
Awareness about HTNC
The level of good awareness about HTNC in hypertensive patients’’ were 32.5% [n=130, 95%CI; 28.3, 37.0] (Figure 3).
Factors Associated with Awareness of HTNC
Age, gender, educational level, marital status, occupation, residency, monthly income, family history of HTN, duration of HTN, health insurance, presence of comorbidities, current smoking status and regular healthcare professional visits were entered into multivariable logistic analysis. Educational level, occupation, residency, monthly income, family history of HTN, duration of HTN, health insurance, presence of comorbidities, current smoking status and regular healthcare professional visits were the factors significantly associated with awareness of HTNC.
The odds of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who have attended secondary and higher education were 3.95 times [AOR=3.95, 95% CI (2.33, 14.92)] and 4.37 times [AOR=4.37, 95% CI (2.57, 15.16)] higher than who had no formal education respectively. Participants who were governmental employed were 3.59 times [AOR=3.59, 95% CI (1.76, 17.77)] more likely to have a good awareness of HTNC when compared to farmers. Likewise, the likelihood of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who were urban residents were 1.68 times [AOR=1.68, 95% CI (1.47, 4.24)] folds more when compared to rural residents.
Participants who had a monthly income of ≥ 3000 ETB were 3.76 times [AOR=3.76, 95% CI (1.36, 10.43)] more likely to have a good awareness of HTNC when compared to participants who had a monthly income of ≤999 ETB.
Moreover, the odds of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who had a family history of HTN were 2.14 times [AOR=2.14, 95% CI (1.92, 8.93)] higher than participants who had no family history of HTN respectively. Similarly, the odds of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who had duration of HTN > 10 years were 2.41 times [AOR=2.41, 95% CI (1.81, 10.73)] higher than participants who had duration of HTN diagnosis ≤ 5 years. Besides, those participants who had health insurance were 3.35 times [AOR=3.35, 95% CI (1.81, 10.48)] more likely to have a good awareness of HTNC when compared to their contraries. The odds of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who were with comorbidities were 1.73 times [AOR=1.73, 95% CI (1.55, 8.93)] higher than participants who had no comorbidities.
Furthermore, those participants who were nonsmoker were 1.72 times [AOR=1.72, 95% CI (1.35, 10.85)] more likely to have a good awareness of HTNC when compared to their contraries. The likelihood of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who had regular health professional visits were 8.20 [AOR=8.20, 95%CI (5.31, 17.59)] folds more when compared to their contraries (Table 3).
Variables |
Category |
Awareness of HTNC |
COR (95%CI) |
AOR (95%CI) |
P-value |
|
Good |
Poor |
|||||
Age in years |
20-39 |
67(47.2%) |
75(52.8%) |
1.65(0.98, 2.75) |
0.82(0.35, 1.90) |
0.642 |
40-59 |
25(16.7%) |
125(83.3%) |
0.37(0.21, 0.66) |
0.89(0.32, 2.45) |
0.816 |
|
≥60 |
38(35.2%) |
70(64.8%) |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Gender |
Male |
85(37.8%) |
140(62.2%) |
1.75(1.14, 2.71) |
1.23(0.60, 2.51) |
0.570 |
Female |
45(25.7%) |
130(74.3%) |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Educational level |
No formal education |
13(16.5%) |
66(83.5%) |
1 |
1 |
|
Primary education |
38(21.2%) |
141(78.8%) |
1.37(0.68, 2.74) |
1.61(0.75, 12.16) |
0.235 |
|
Secondary education |
42(53.8%) |
36(46.2%) |
5.92(2.82, 12.45) |
3.95(2.33, 14.92) |
0.011 |
|
Higher education |
37(57.8%) |
27(42.2%) |
6.96(3.21, 15.09) |
4.37(2.57, 15.16) |
0.001 |
|
Marital status |
Single |
20(21.1% |
75(78.9%) |
1 |
1 |
|
Married |
70(43.8%) |
90(56.3%) |
2.92(1.63, 5.23) |
2.11(0.22, 9.02) |
0.143 |
|
Divorced |
25(34.7%) |
47(65.3%) |
1.99(0.99, 3.98) |
1.93(0.72, 5.16) |
0.129 |
|
Widowed |
15(20.5%) |
58(79.5%) |
0.97(0.46, 2.06) |
0.83(0.29, 2.32) |
0.942 |
|
Occupation |
Farmer |
25(18.2%) |
112(81.8%) |
1 |
1 |
|
House wife |
23(28.8%) |
57(71.3%) |
1.81(0.94, 3.46) |
2.30(0.78, 6.76) |
0.135 |
|
Governmental employed |
50(52.1%) |
46(47.9%) |
4.87(2.70, 8.79) |
3.59(1.76, 17.77) |
0.014 |
|
Private business |
12(27.9%) |
31(72.1%) |
1.73(0.78, 3.84) |
1.94(0.63, 6.01) |
0.108 |
|
Unemployed |
20(45.5%) |
24(54.5%) |
3.73(1.79, 7.79) |
3.65(0.10, 12.97) |
0.440 |
|
Residency |
Urban |
90(37.2%) |
152(62.8%) |
1.75(1.12, 2.72) |
1.68(1.47, 4.24) |
0.041 |
Rular |
40(25.3%) |
118(74.7%) |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Monthly income in ETB |
≤ 999 |
24(18.9%) |
103(81.1%) |
1 |
1 |
|
1000-1999 |
21(26.6%) |
58(73.4%) |
1.55(0.79, 3.03) |
1.88(0.62, 5.68) |
0.264 |
|
2000-2999 |
18(30.0%) |
42(70.0%) |
1.84(0.91, 3.74) |
1.81(0.71, 9.85) |
0.420 |
|
≥ 3000 |
67(50.0%) |
67(50.0%) |
4.29(2.46, 7.50) |
3.76(1.36, 10.43) |
0.012 |
|
Family history of HTN |
Present |
76(49.4%) |
78(50.6%) |
3.97(2.36, 6.67) |
2.14(1.92, 8.93) |
0.023 |
Not sure |
26(25.0%) |
78(75.0%) |
1.36(0.74, 2.49) |
1.80(0.12, 6.99) |
0.270 |
|
Absent |
28(19.7%) |
114(80.3%) |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Duration of HTN in years |
≤ 5 |
57(26.0%) |
162(74.0%) |
1 |
1 |
|
6-10 |
36(31.9%) |
77(68.1%) |
1.33(0.81, 2.19) |
1.48(0.72, 3.02) |
0.193 |
|
> 10 |
37(54.4%) |
31(45.6%) |
3.39(1.93, 5.97) |
2.41(1.81, 10.73) |
0.021 |
|
Health insurance |
Yes |
45(62.5%) |
27(37.5%) |
4.77(2.78, 8.15) |
3.35(1.81, 10.48) |
0.015 |
No |
85(25.9%) |
243(74.1%) |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Presence of co-morbidities |
Yes |
38(43.2%) |
50(56.8%) |
1.82(1.12, 2.96) |
1.73(1.55, 8.93) |
0.030 |
No |
92(29.5%) |
220(70.5%) |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Current smoking status |
Yes |
15(23.1%) |
50(76.9%) |
1 |
1 |
|
No |
115(34.3%) |
220(65.7%) |
1.74(0.94, 3.24) |
1.72(1.35, 10.85) |
0.032 |
|
Regular professional visit |
Yes |
106(59.2%) |
73(40.8%) |
11.92(7.10, 20.01) |
8.20(5.31, 17.59) |
0.000 |
No |
24(10.9%) |
197(89.1%) |
1 |
1 |
|
Table 3 Bivariable and Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Awareness of HTNC Among Study Participants Attending at PHAZ, Ethiopia
Notice: Bold sign refers to factors significantly associated, p-value <0.05 in final model.
This study was done to assess the patients’ level of awareness about HTNC and associated factors in hypertensive patients. This is because knowing the level of awareness about HTNC and associated factors is a cornerstone for HTN management in order to control the burden of HTN because of its associated morbidity and mortality.
This study showed that the level of participants who had a good awareness about HTNC was 32.5% [95%CI; 28.3, 37.0]. This study finding was lower than a study conducted in Sri Lanka and Nepal where the proportion of awareness of HTNC were (48.2%) and (86.6%),26,28 respectively. This study finding was lower compared with the study done in Saudi Arabia 70.3%.29 This study finding was consistent with the study conducted in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where the proportion of awareness of HTN was 32%.30 However, this study finding was higher than the study done in Tanzania where the awareness level of HTNC was (11.3%).31
Regarding to the proportion of common HTNC, this study revealed that about 38%, 42%, 34% and 20% of participants were aware that HTN can lead them to stroke, heart disease, eye disease, kidney disease, respectively. This study finding was lower compared to the study conducted in Karachi, South Asia where the awareness HTNC was 100% for stroke, 95.5% for heart diseases, 59.1% for kidney disease and 54.5% for eye disease.32
This study finding was lower compared with the study done in Saudi Arabia where the awareness levels of HTNC were 68.2% for heart attack and 38.4% for stroke.29 This study finding was also lower than the study done in southern Tanzania where the awareness of HTNC were 58.9% for stroke, 83.3% for heart disease, 32.0% for kidney diseases and 44.2% for eye diseases.31 This study finding was also lower than the study done in Nigeria where awareness of HTNC were 70%, 60.6%, 59.4% and 25.9% for stroke, heart disease, eye disease and kidney disease respectively.33 This finding is also lower than the study conducted in India for awareness of heart disease and kidney damage which were 66.7% and 35.71% respectively. However, it is higher than the awareness of brain damage and other complications (eye damage and arterial damage) which were 34.7% and 19% respectively.34
This study finding was also lower compared with the study conducted in northern Sri Lanka where 23.7% and 46.7% of the participants were aware that HTN could lead them to kidney damage and brain damage respectively. This finding was in line with for the awareness of heart damage which was 42.2%. However, it is higher compared with the same study for the awareness of eye damage which was 13.8%.28 Similarly, when this finding is compared with a study done in India; it is higher for the awareness of brain damage which was 34.7%, while lower than the awareness for heart damage and kidney damage which were 66.7% and 35.7% respectively.35
This study finding was lower compared with the study done in Saudi Arabia where the study reported of the awareness level of HTNC were 83.2% for stroke, 82.7% for heart disease, 79.9% for kidney disease, and 65.8% for blindness.36 This study finding was lower compared to the study conducted in Turkey where the awareness level for stroke was 89%.37 This study finding was higher compared to the study conducted in Korea where the awareness for stroke was 31%.38
This study finding was higher than the study done in Russia where the awareness of HTNC were 24.9% for stroke and 17.9% for heart damage.39 Likewise, this finding was also higher than a study done in Pakistan where the awareness of HTNC was 27.9%, 9.9% and 14.8% for stroke, kidney disease and eye disease, respectively. While, it is lower than the awareness of HTNC for heart disease, which was 56.3%.27 This study finding was higher than the study done in Korea where 80% and 98% of the participants were unaware that HTN would lead them to heart disease and kidney disease respectively.40
The odds of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who have attended secondary and higher education were 3.95 times [AOR=3.95, 95% CI (2.33, 14.92)] and 4.37 times [AOR=4.37, 95% CI (2.57, 15.16)] higher than who had no formal education respectively. This finding was supported by studies in southern Tanzania and Russia.31,39 The participants who were governmental employed were 3.59 times [AOR=3.59, 95% CI (1.76, 17.77)] more likely to have a good awareness of HTNC when compared to farmers. This might be due to relatively thinking most of the governmental employed individuals are well educated.
Likewise, the likelihood of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who were urban residents were 1.68 times [AOR=1.68, 95% CI (1.47, 4.24)] folds more when compared to rural residents. The participants who had monthly income of ≥ 3000 ETB were 3.76 times [AOR=3.76, 95% CI (1.36, 10.43)] more likely to have a good awareness of HTNC when compared to participants who had monthly income of ≤999 ETB. Moreover, the odds of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who had a positive family history of HTN were 2.14 times [AOR=2.14, 95% CI (1.92, 8.93)] higher than participants who had no family history of hypertension. This finding is supported by a study done in southern Tanzania.31
Similarly, the odds of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who had duration of HTN > 10 years were 2.41 times [AOR=2.41, 95% CI (1.81, 10.73)] higher than participants who had duration of HTN diagnosis ≤ 5 years. This finding was consistent with a study done in southern Tanzania.31 Besides, those participants who had health insurance were 3.35 times [AOR=3.35, 95% CI (1.81, 10.48)] more likely to have a good awareness of HTNC when compared to their contraries.
The odds of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who were with comorbidities were 1.73 times [AOR=1.73, 95% CI (1.55, 8.93)] higher than participants who had no comorbidities. Furthermore, those participants who were non-smoker were 1.72 times [AOR=1.72, 95% CI (1.35, 10.85)] more likely to have a good awareness of HTNC when compared to their contraries. The likelihood of having a good awareness of HTNC among participants who had regular health professional visit were 8.20 [AOR=8.20, 95%CI (5.31, 17.59)] folds more when compared to their contraries.
Cross-sectional study design does not help to determine the cause and effect. Furthermore, there is no study conducted that shows the common complications, awareness of HTNC and associated factors in Ethiopia and also in different counties adequately.
The awareness about HTNC among study participants who were was low. Educational level, occupation, residency, monthly income, family history of hypertension, duration of hypertension, health insurance, presence of comorbidities, current smoking status, and regular healthcare professional visits were factors significantly associated with awareness of HTNC.
This study finding offers a foundation to help health care providers for the management of HTNC. This study also aids them to emphasis on and design strategies to address this problem. Finally, we recommend that there is a need to initiate programs that could create public awareness about HTNC among hypertensive patients residing in the area in order to improve their awareness. Furthermore, any concerned bodies such as policy makers and implementers should highly focus and create the strategies that would enhance the awareness of these patients about HTNC. Moreover, special attention should be provided to these patients in the clinical practice area also. All health care providers including the nurses, they have to incorporate the health education about HTNC during follow-up time of these patients.
The authors have contributed to the conception of the study, data analysis, drafting or revising the article, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Addis Ababa University. Besides, the letter of permission was gained from the Zonal health bureau and hospital director. For the purpose of privacy and confidentiality, personal identifiers were not used and participants were insured about the confidentiality of information attained. Finally, they have signed a written consent agreement.
No animals were used in this research. During this study, all human procedures were performed as per the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.
STROBE guidelines were followed.
The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the manuscript.
This study was funded by Addis Ababa University.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
We would like to thank participating supervisors, data collectors, patients, selected public hospitals and Addis Ababa University. This study was uploaded as a thesis repository to Addis Ababa University, in June 2019.41 http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/21347
©2024 Wake, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.