Edoxaban in dialisys: a 2-year follow-up in a single center experience

doi:10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00505

Journal of

eISSN: 2373-4396

Cardiology & Current Research

Case Report Volume 14 Issue 2

Edoxaban in dialisys: a 2-year follow-up in a single center experience

Giovanni Fazio,

Verify Captcha

Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.

Leonardo Ingrasciotta, Gaspare Milana

Deaprtment of Cardiology, Triolo Zancla Hospital, Italy

Correspondence: Giovanni Fazio, Department of Cardiology, Triolo Zancla Hospital, Via Albiri 3/a – 90125 – Palermo, Italy, Tel +39.3334439962

Received: April 03, 2021 | Published: April 22, 2021

Citation: Fazio G, Ingrasciotta L, Milana G. Edoxaban in dialisys: a 2-year follow-up in a single center experience. J Cardiol Curr Res. 2021;14(2):34-36. DOI: 10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00505

Download PDF

Abstract

Background: In literature there are not data about treatment with Edoxaban and NOACs in dialytic patients. We report our experience about.

Methods: Data for this study were retrospectively obtained from 24 consecutive patients affected by atrial fibrillation and severe chronic renal impairment in dialysis.

We analyzed the data obtained in a high-volume Italian cardiological center.

Results: All patients included were treated with Edoxaban for atrial fibrillation. At the time of the data collection, the mean follow-up in valvular patients was 24±2months. There were no major bleedings, strokes, transitory ischemic event, systemic embolisms, or cardiovascular deaths were been reported. 3(12,5%) cases of minor bleeding was reported. The complication rate of the patients in dialysis are the same than the atrial fibrillation population without any statistical differences (1,39% vs 1,37% à p:0,96).

Conclusion: The use of Edoxaban in dialysis and atrial fibrillation seems safe and effective.

Keywords: renal impairment, dialysis, edoxaban, atrial fibrillation, safety, efficacy, complication rate

Introduction

European and American guidelines advise the use of new anticoagulation therapy in patients affected by atrial fibrillation, and in clinical practice many cardiologists us these drugs currently. The Italian drug agency authorizes the prescription in dialytic patients, even if in literature there are few inconclusive studies, all with Apixaban.

From 2012 to date, numerous revisions of the European guidelines on atrial fibrillation have been published, a progressive enlargement of treatment with NOACs in patients with a progressive low clearance.^1–6 Edoxaban has been tested till now in patients with a clearance of creatinine higher than 15. It is uncleared if the ultrafiltration is able to reduce the hematic concentration of Edoxaban. In our experience, we have carried out a retrospective observational study on a cohort of 24 patients suffering from atrial fibrillation, treated with Edoxaban and with renal impairment. They did dialysis before the medical visit.

Methods

Data for this present study was retrospectively obtained from consecutive patients suffering from AF in one high-volume Italian cardiological centers by analyzing the reports of patients with NVAF who were included in the Italian Registry of Drugs (AIFA registry). Selected patients received a prescription for Edoxaban June 2016 and another one in September 2019. In order to be included in this study, patients had to meet these criteria: at least one episode of documented AF of any duration in the previous 12months, a CHA2DS2-VASc [Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75years, Diabetes mellitus, previous Stroke/transient ischemic attack [double weight]–Vascular disease, Age 65–74years old, (female) Sex category] score ≥2; any type of NVAF; age >18 years; and a bio-prosthetic aortic valve implantation before the Edoxaban administration. All data was compared to a data obtained from the AIFA Registry of all 2251 patients affected by atrial fibrillation of our institution. To compare the results on the valvar patients, we computed the percentage incidence of events. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, who consented to the analysis and storage of their data in the AIFA registry. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the ethical committees were retrospectively informed of the present study. Standard two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic examination was always performed. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured using the modified Simpson’s rule from the apical view. Follow-up, characterized by clinical examination, Electrocardiogram and blood analysis, was performed every 6 months. None of the 36 patients was lost in follow-up.

The main endpoint was the incidence of major bleedings according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition, or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleedings or thromboembolic events, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death. A secondary safety endpoint was total minor bleedings. All patients’ follow-up data was blinded and analyzed with the SPSS® Statistics 24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) software. Patients were analyzed for occurrence of events and for main clinical and laboratory characteristics as well as concomitant medications.

Results

The main clinical and laboratory characteristics, as well as concomitant medications for the 24 patients in the study are shown in Table 1.

All patients were treated with Edoxaban for atrial fibrillation.
At the time of the data collection, the average follow-up in dialytic patients was 24±4months. There were no major bleedings, strokes, transitory ischemic event, systemic embolisms, or cardiovascular deaths reported. 3 (12,5%) cases of minor bleeding were reported.
The results and the comparison with all atrial fibrillation patients are reported in Table 2.
The complication rate of the patients in dialysis is similar to that of fibrillation patients, indeed no statistical differences were found.

	Dialysis	All patients
No. of patients [n (%)]	24	2251
Age (years) [mean±SD]	73,7±6.9	76,4±2.4	NS
Male/female [n (%)]	44%/56%	52%/48%	NS
Creatinine (mg/dL) [mean±SD]	3.86±1.2	0.96±0.7	NS
Months of anticoagulation therapy (mean±SD)	24±2	37±15	NS
Paroximal o Persistent AF [n (%)]	88,50%	18,50%	NS
Permanent AF [n (%)]	12,50%	72,35%	NS
Hypertension [n (%)]	79%	83%	NS
Hypertensive Cardiomyopathy	16%	50%	NS
Diabetes mellitus [n (%)]	25%	25%	NS
Heart failure [n (%)]	8,30%	7,40%	NS
Previous stroke/TIA [n (%)]	8,30%	8,25%	NS
Ischemic cardiomyopathy [n (%)]	10,25%	9,25%	NS
β-Blockers [n (%)]	36,25%	48,25%	NS
ACE inhibitors or ARB blockers [n (%)]	66,00%	61,00%	NS
Digossin [n (%)]	25,00%	55,75%	NS
RAAS inhibitors [n (%)]	8,30%	30,00%	NS
Amiodaron [n (%)]	16,00%	13,00%	NS
Neprilisine Inhibitor [n (%)]	8,30%	6,95%	NS
LVEF (mean±SD)	58%	56%	NS
Left atrium diameter (mm) [mean±SD]	19.0±3.1	22.2±3.1	<0.001
CHA2DS2-VASc score (mean±SD)	4.02±1.5	4.12±2.5	NS
HAS-BLED score (mean±SD)	2.50±0.7	2.08±1.1	NS

Table 1 Concomitant medications for the 24 patients

	Dialysis	All patients	P
Major bleadings	0%	0,004%	NS
CRNM	0%	0,02%	NS
Cardiovascular death	0%	0,004%	NS
Minor bleadings	12,50%	11,2%	NS
TIA	0,00%	1,1%	NS
Stroke	0%	0,02%	NS
Systemic embolism	0%	0,001%	NS
Pulmonary embolism	0%	0,001%	NS
Cardiovascular death	0%	0,004%	NS
Complication rate	1,39%	1,37%	NS

Table 2 The comparison with all atrial fibrillation patients

Discussion

The rationale of the use of NOACs in patients in dialysis is based on few studies and until now no clinical trial nor collection in human were reported.^1–6

The high risk of thromboembolic events and the same time the high risk of bleeding in this class of patients have been demonstrated.

The use of warfarin in this class of patients is the best opportunity today, but with a non-negligible risk of kidney warfarin’ disease. Due to a major activation of the prothrombin factor in patients in dialysis, the thromboembolic risk is higher than in population without a renal impairment. Few studies with apixaban seem to demonstrate the safety of factor X inhibitor in treatment of these patients. However, the elimination of the drugs in patients in dialysis depending on the ultrafiltration so the results of apixaban cannot enlarge to other factor X inhibitors. Until now the use of Edoxaban has been tested in patients with a clearance >15. An in vitro study showed that dialysis is able to eliminate this drug from blood. In order to answer the question, we analyzed the data of patients affected by atrial fibrillation who performed dialysis.

We followed 24 patients in dialysis who were treated with Edoxaban in all cases due to the presence of atrial fibrillation. In order to evaluate the efficiency of Edoxaban in this subpopulation, we compared the data relative to safety and effectiveness events to the general ones of all fibrillating patients followed at our institution. The comparison demonstrated the efficiency and safety of an Edoxaban approach in this subpopulation, with an overall event index similar in the two populations.

The limited number of patients is the principal limitation of the study, as it prevented any sub-analysis of the type of events.

It is interesting to note that in this population the characteristic of the heart is normal in many patients, and the atrial fibrillation could be due to electrolytic disorders of these patients: in this population the atrial fibrillation is frequently paroxysmal and seriate holter monitoring may be registered in patient in dialysis.

Conclusion

In our experience, we have used Edoxaban in a population of 24 subjects in dialysis and with an atrial fibrillation: the event rate of this subpopulation was not different from that of all patients with fibrillation.