Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-4396

Cardiology & Current Research

Clinical Report Volume 11 Issue 1

An Experience of a Tertiary Center for 9 Years on Patients with Surgical and Percutaneous Closure of Atrial Septal Defects

Eser Varış,1 Emre Ozdemir,2 Tuncay Kırış,2 Sadik Emren,2 Cem Nazli,2 Mehmet Tokac2

1Dr. Burhan Nalbantoglu Goverment Hospital,Lefkosa, Turkish Republic of North Cyprus, Turkey
2Izmir Katip Celebi University, Cardiology Department, Turkey

Correspondence: Emre Ozdemir, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Cardiology, Basin Sitesi/Karabaglar-IZMIR/Turkey, Post Code: 35360, Tel 90 (232) 244 44 44, Fax 90 (232) 243 15 30

Received: January 07, 2018 | Published: January 29, 2018

Citation: Varis E, Ozdemir E, Kiris T, Emren S, Nazli C et al. (2018) An Experience of a Tertiary Center for 9 Years on Patients with Surgical and Percutaneous Closure of Atrial Septal Defects. J Cardiol Curr Res 11(1): 00369. DOI: 10.15406/jccr.2018.11.00369

Download PDF

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial septal defect (ASD) is one of the most common congenital cardiac disease, accounts for 7-10% of all congenital heart diseases in children and 30-33% in adults. Although ASD usually asymptomatic, it can lead to exercise intolerance, atrial arrhythmia, right ventricular dysfunction, and pulmonary.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the observational cohort who underwent transcatheter or surgical closure of ASD. Treatment options were determined according to the guidelines. We retrospectively collected patients’ demographic characteristics, pre/post-procedure echocardiography outcomes, complication rates.

Results: Demographic features are similar in both groups. Defect size and valvular pathologies are more frequent in surgical group. Hospitalization duration is longer in surgical groups.

Conclusion: As a conclusion if the patients are evaluated and selected carefully, both surgical and percutaneous closure is convenient and successful in the treatment of ASD.

Keywords: atrial septal defect, surgical ASD closure, transcatheter ASD closure

Introduction

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is one of the most common congenital cardiac diseases.1 ASD accounts for 7-10% of all congenital heart diseases in children and 30-33% in adults. Although ASD usually asymptomatic, it can lead to exercise intolerance, atrial arrhythmia, right ventricular dysfunction, and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Guidelines recommend closure of ASD if right ventricular enlargement became regardless of symptoms in patients.2 The main treatment option is percutaneous transcatheter closure and the other is surgical.

 

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the observational cohort who underwent transcatheter or surgical closure of ASD. Treatment options were determined according to the guidelines. We retrospectively collected patients’ demographic characteristics, pre/post-procedure echocardiography outcomes, complication rates. 305 patients with ASDs who underwent closure were evaluated at the Cardiology Clinic of Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital from 2006 until 2015. If necessary cardiac catheterization was performed, Qp/Qs calculation and ASD sizing was revealed. Heart Team consensus decided the selection of the most appropriate treatment (cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, anesthetists).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables were expressed as the number of patients together with the ratio of total count. Comparisons of parametric values between groups were made using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test depending on the situation. The Chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables between the groups. Paired-samples T test was used to compare values before and after the procedure. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistics were performed using SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Patients’ baseline clinical and complaints was similar between group (Table 1). The 69.5% of the patients were female and 30.5% were male. The mean age of the patients was 35.6±14.6. Dispne seen as the most common compliant of patients in 45% of the percutaneous treated group and 59% of the surgically treated group (p = 0.094) (Table 1). Mitral regurgitation (p=0.022), pulmonary stenosis (p <0.001), severe tricuspid regurgitation (p <0.001) were more frequent in the surgical group. There was no difference between the groups in the concomitant cardiac anomalies (Table 1). Defect size was greater in surgical group (24.8 ± 9.2 vs 18.9±6.4 p<0.001) (Table 1).

Variable

Transcatheter ASD Closure (n:223)

Surgical ASD Closure (n:82)

p-Value

Age (year)

36.5 ± 14.7

33.2 ± 13.8

0.082

Sex (Male/Female)

71/ 152

22 / 60

0.4

Hypertension, n(%)

28 (13)

6 (7)

0.197

Coronary Artery Disease, n(%)

9 (4)

2 (3)

0.146

Diabetes mellutis, n(%)

9 (4)

2 (2)

0.507

Cerebrovasculer Disease, n(%)

2 (1)

0 (0)

0.691

Cronic Renal Failure, n(%)

1 (0.4)

0 (0)

0.544

Complaint on application

   

0.094

Dispne, n(%)

100 (45)

48 (59)

 

Palpitation, n(%)

44 (20)

18 (22)

Recurren Stroke, n(%)

2 (1)

0 (0)

Chest Pain, n(%)

2 (1)

0 (0)

Mitral regurgitation

   

0.022

Mild, n (%)

94 (42)

38 (46)

 

Moderate, n(%)

8 (4)

4 (5)

Severe, n(%)

0(0)

3 (4)

Mitral stenosis

   

0.213

Mild, n(%)

1 (0.4)

0 (0)

 

Moderate, n(%)

0 (0)

1 (1.2)

Severe, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Aortic regurgitation

   

0.49

Mild, n(%)

14 (6)

7 (8)

 

Moderate, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Severe, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Aortic Stenosis

   

0.544

Mild, n(%)

1 (0.4)

0 (0)

 

Moderate, n (%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Severe, n (%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Tricuspid regurgitation

   

<0.001

Mild, n(%)

194 (87)

58 (71)

 

Moderate, n(%)

23 (10)

8 (10)

Severe, n(%)

2 (1)

4 (15)

Tricuspid Stenosis

   

0.544

Mild, n(%)

1 (0.4)

0 (0)

 

Moderate, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Severe, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Pulmonary regurgitation

   

0.525

Mild, n(%)

29 (13)

9 (11)

 

Moderate, n(%)

2 (4)

2 (2)

Severe, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Pulmonary stenosis

   

< 0.01

Mild, n(%)

9 (4)

4 (5)

 

Moderate, n(%)

0 (0)

1 (1.2)

Severe, n(%)

0 (0)

7 (9)

Concominant Cardiac Anomalies

   

0.661

PFO, n(%)

14 (6)

6 (6)

 

ISA, n(%)

3(13)

0(0)

EV, n(%)

7 (13)

1 (2)

PVRA, n(%)

1(0.4)

0 (0)

ASD Defect size (mm)

18.9 ± 6.4

24.8 ± 9.2

<0.001

Table 1 Baseline clinical and echocardiographic feature of patients
PVRA, pulmonary venous return anomaly; PFO, patent foramen ovale; ISA, interatrial septal aneurysm; EV, eustachian valve; ASD, atrial septal defect; N, number

Mortality was higher in the surgical group (p=0.016). Minimal residual shunt, definated as shunt jet <2 mm via color dopler echocardiography, was more occurred in percutaneous group (p=0,016). Otherwise, major (need transfusion >2 units erythrocyte suspension) and minor bleeding (p< 0.01), pericardial effusion (p< 0.01) and pneumothorax (p: 0.019) higher in the surgical group. Dehiscence was observed in 3 patients and device embolization was observed in 3 patients at percutaneous group, these ones underwent surgical operation. Permanent pacemaker was not required in both groups. In a patient with percutaneous closure, re-intervention was required. No statistical difference was observed between the groups in other complications (Table 2). Surgical procedure was performed with primary suture in 53% and graft in 48% of patients who underwent surgical closure. The 78% of transcatheter patients underwent balloon sizing. 4% of transcatheter patients need to change the device during the procedure. Amplatzer device was used in 55%, Cardi-O-Fix Occluders device in 42% and BioSTAR device in 2% of patients. The duration of hospital stay was higher in the surgical group (3 ± 1.5 days versus 12 ± 4 days, p <0.001). Treatment success rates were similar in both groups. (95% versus 99%, p = 0.139). Postoperative echocardiographic control were performed as 3 months after procedure on average (Table 3). In the light of these findings a significant reduction was observed in right atrium diameters after closure at transcatheter group (p<0.001), but not in the surgical group (p=0.162) (Table 3). Significant changes were observed in both the percutaneous closure and the surgical closure group before the procedure in left ventricle diastolic diameter, left ventricle systolic diameter, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, right ventricular diastolic diameter (Table 3).

Variable

Transcatheter ASD Closure (n:223)

Surgical ASD Closure (n:82)

p-Value

Periprocedural shunt, n(%)

15 (7)

0 (0)

0.016

Major bleeding, n(%)

3 (1)

23 (28)

 

Minor bleeding, n(%)

1 (0.4)

27 (33)

< 0.01

Pleural effusion, n(%)

0 (0)

2(2.4)

0.065

Pericardial effusion, n(%)

6 (3)

11(14)

< 0.01

Occluder dehiscence , n(%)

3 (1.3)

0 (0)

0.291

Occluder thrombosis, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

-

Cerebral infarction, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

-

Device embolism, n(%)

3 (1)

0 (0)

0.291

Pneumothorax, n(%)

0 (0)

2 (2.4)

0.019

Permanent pacemaker implantation, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

-

Arrhythmia, n(%)

5 (2.4)

0 (0)

0.393

Repeat operation, n(%)

1 (0.4)

0 (0)

0.544

Pulmonary edema, n(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

-

Table 2 Procedural complications

Discussion

ASD is seen one in 1500 live births, more common in women. In accordance with this information in our study, the number of female patients was more than the number of male patients (Table 1). Percutaneous technique is increasingly evolving and this method becomes the dominant treatment option for ASD treatment as in our study (Table 1). In this study, deaths were observed in 2 patients who underwent surgery on long-term follow-up, with no relationship with ASD closure (Table 2). Surgical closure is a more invasive procedure so the perioperative mortality rate is partially affected by surgical intervention. Pericardial effusion, haemorrhage and arrhythmias are the most common complications observed in the literature on surgery group and late deaths did not related with the closure of ASD in both groups on studies.4 Complications associated with transcatheter closure are pericardial effusion, femoral access point complications and device embolization.5 Device embolization was observed at 1% in our study, dehiscence was observed at 1.3%, one of this dehiscence needs percutaneous intervention and two others were followed without intervention (Table 2). In addition, pericardial effusion rate was 3% in percutaneous group and intervention was not needed. In our population, the most frequent complications were major-minor bleedings (61%) and pericardial effusion (24%) on the surgical group. On the other hand, arrhythmia was not observed in the surgical closure group (Table 2). In unclosed ASD, the risk of stroke and thromboembolism was reported to be 4% in patients with a mean age of 36.4 years.6 Both methods have been shown to prevent these events in a similar rates.7 In our study, cerebral infarction were not observed after closure in both groups as in the literature (Table 2). In some studies which acute heart failure develops due to a sudden increase in left ventricular preload after ASD closure.8 in our patient population, heart failure was not observed in patients in both groups (Table 2). Increased blood flow from ASD shunt results pulmonary hypertension (PH) with 6-27% coincidence rate.9 However, the shunt of ASD does not cause PH at all patients. This suggests that different mechanisms may play a role in the development of PH in some patients. Decrease in pulmonary artery pressures (PAP) is the first target of ASD closure.10 In a study by De Lezo et al.11 a 21-month follow-up showed an early and persistent PAP decrease that caused clinical improvement.11 Veldtman et al.12 that the expected systolic PAP values tend to normalize after ASD closure, in their study, systolic PAP decreased under 35 mmHg in 29% of patients within one year.12 In our study, the decrease in PAP after the procedure was significantly higher in the patients who underwent percutaneous closure (Table 3). ASD is the leading cause of chronic volume loading in the right atrium (RA) and right ventricle (RV).13 Progressive RA and RV dilation are associated with long-term arrhythmia and impairment of left ventricular function. RV remodelling begins within 24 hours after percutaneous closure and lasts for 6-8 weeks. Trees et al.14 observed a decrease in the size of the right heart cavities after percutaneous closure.14 In surgical studies, it has been found that the surgeon often fails to normalize the cardiac geometry.15 In our study, both the surgical and percutaneous closure groups showed a significant decrease in the size of the RV. In our study, both the surgical and percutaneous closure groups showed a significant decrease in the size of the RV before the procedure (Table 3). Due to the stopped shunt from ASD, left ventricle (LV) diastolic diameters increases. Right ventricle dilatation before closure, directly septal slip from right to left and indirectly through the pericardium, restricts both LV size and filling. Thilen et al.14 and Monfredi et al.15 shown that post-procedural LV diastolic diameters and LV fractional shortening increase in both surgical and percutaneous closure patients.14,15 Consistent with these study results above, we observed a significant increase in LV diameters after surgery in both our surgical and percutaneous closure groups (Table 3).

 

Transcatheter ASD Closure

Surgical ASD Closure

Variable

Pre-procedural

Post- precedural

p-value

Pre-procedural

Post- precedural

p-value

RAD (mm)

41.7 ± 8.1

34.3 ± 6.6

<0.001

42.3 ± 12

35.2 ± 7.9

0.162

LVDD (mm)

42.3 ± 4.1

44.8 ± 4.0

<0.001

42.2 ± 5.2

45.8 ± 4.7

<0.001

LVSD (mm)

24.9 ± 4.1

26.2 ± 4.1

<0.001

24.1 ± 6.5

28.6 ± 4.4

<0.001

SPAP (mmHG)

41 ± 11

24.5 ± 6

<0.001

37 ± 18

24 ± 6

<0.001

RVDD (mm)

36.6 ± 5.9

29.9 ± 4.2

<0.001

40.2 ± 11.2

30.9 ± 4.8

<0.001

Table 3 Echocardiographic features of the patients before and after the procedure
RAD, right atrium diamater; LVDD, left ventricul diastolic diamater; LVSD, left ventricul sistolic diamater; SPAP, sistolic pulmoner arterial pressure; RVDD, right venricul diastolic diamater

Conclusion

As a conclusion if the patients are evaluated and selected carefully, both surgical and percutaneous closure is convenient and successful in the treatment of ASD.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

There were no financial interest or conflict of interest.

References

  1. Geva T, Martins JD, Wald RM. Atrial septal defects. Lancet. 2014;383(9932):1921-1932.
  2. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines on the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation. 2008;52(23):e143-263.
  3. King TD, Mills NL. Nonoperative closure of atrial septal defects. Surgery. 1974;75(3):383-388.
  4. Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, et al. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults. JACC. 2002;39(11):1836-1844.
  5. Meier B, Lock JE. Contemporary management of Patent Foramen Ovale. Circulation. 2003;107(1):5-9.
  6. Hoffmann A, Chockalingam P, Balint OH, et al. Cerebrovascular accidents in adult patients with congenital heart disease. Heart. 2010;96(15):1223-1226.
  7. Kotowycz MA, Therrien J, Ionescu-Ittu R, et al. Long-term outcomes after surgical versus transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(5):497-503.
  8. Schubert S, Peters B, Abdul-Khaliq H, et al. Left ventricular conditioning in the elderly patient to prevent congestive heart failure after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;64(3):333-337.
  9. Sachweh JS, Daebritz SH, Hermanns B, et al. Hypertensive pulmonary vascular disease in adults with secundum or sinus venosus atrial septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(1):207-213.
  10. Humenberger M, Rosenhek R, Gabriel H, et al. Benefit of atrial septal defect closure in adults: impact of age. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(5):553-560.
  11. De Lezo J, Medina A, Romero M, et al. Effectiveness of percutaneous device occlusion for atrial septal defect in adult patients with pulmonary hypertension. Am Heart J. 2002;144(5):877-880.
  12. Veldtman GR, Razack V, Siu S, et al. Right ventricular form and function after percutaneous atrial septal defect device closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(8):2108-2113.
  13. Campbell M. Natural history of atrial septal defect. Br Heart J. 1970;32(6):820-826.
  14. Monfredi O, Luckie M, Mirjafari H, et al. Percutaneous device closure of atrial septal defect results in very early and sustained changes of right and left heart function. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(4):1578-1584.
  15. Thilen U, Persson S. Closure of atrial septal defect in the adult. Cardiac remodeling is an early event. Int J Cardiol. 2006;108(3):370-375.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Varis, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.