Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-4396

Cardiology & Current Research

Case Report Volume 2 Issue 3

Case Report of Domiciliary Treatment with Tolvaptan in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure and Persistent Hyponatremia

Alberto Esteban Fernandez, Nahikari Salterain Gonzalez, Juan J Gavira Gomez

Cardiology Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Spain

Correspondence: Esteban Fernandez A, Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain

Received: February 09, 2015 | Published: March 25, 2015

Citation: Fernande AE, Gonzalez NS, Gomez JJG (2015) Case Report of Domiciliary Treatment with Tolvaptan in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure and Persistent Hyponatremia. J Cardiol Curr Res 2(3): 00058. DOI: 10.15406/jccr.2015.02.00058

Download PDF

Abstract

Management of patients with advanced heart failure and persistent hyponatremia remains a difficult challenge today. Classical treatment is not always enough, not only because of diuretics resistance, but also because of the natural course of heart failure and several comorbidities. Tolvaptan, a V2 receptor inhibitor in the kidneys, has demonstrated its utility and safety in refractory hyponatremia correction in patients with decompensated heart failure, but there is little experience about its use in management of chronic hyponatremia. We present a report of a case series with long term domiciliary treatment with Tolvaptan followed up in a Heart Failure unit.

Keywords: Tolvaptan; Heart failure; Hyponatremia; Domiciliary treatment

Introduction

Hyponatremia, defined as plasmatic sodium (Na) level lower than 135 mEq/L, is known to be a marker of bad prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) [1]. Until now, its treatment included water restriction, hypertonic fluids and diuretics, although there is not enough evidence about its effectiveness. Tolvaptan, an inhibitor of V2 receptor in the renal tubule, has been recently included in ESC (2012) and AHA/ACC (2013) HF guidelines [2,3] as an alternative treatment of refractory hyponatremia in de compensated HF. So far there is little experience about its usefulness in persistent and domiciliary hyponatremia management. We present our clinical experience in the utility and safety of domiciliary treatment with Tolvaptan in patients with advanced HF and persistent hyponatremia.

Methods

We considered patients who started ambulatory treatment with Tolvaptan after at least two admissions due to de compensated HF and hyponatremia treated with classical methods and Tolvaptan. Patients with advanced kidney or hepatic diseases were excluded. Week Tolvaptan dose was adjusted periodically (every week during the first month and then monthly) according to blood analytic results: Na, potassium (K), Creatinine (Cr), glomerular filtration rate (MDRD), urea and, in some cases, blood and urine osmolarity.
Follow-up was done by two specialized nurses and medical staff in our HF unit. Weight, congestion signs, symptoms of HF, blood pressure, heart rate and adverse effects related with Tolvaptan (e.g. hepatic disease) [4] were assessed.

Results

We present 6 patients (5 women) with a mean age of 71±19 years old (Table 1). The mean follow-up was 17 months. Patients 2 to 6 died during the follow-up (all of them died due to cardiovascular reasons except patient 5 who died because of pulmonary sepsis). Patient 1 had to discontinue Tolvaptan due to economic reasons and is still alive.

 

Patient 1

Patient 2

Patient 3

Patient 4

Patient 5

Patient 6

Sex

Female

Female

Female

Female

Female

Male

Age (years)

91

63

81

77

37

74

Etiology

Hypert

Valv

Valv

Isch

Chemo

Isch+Valv

LVSD (LVSF<0.50)

No

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

NYHA Class

III

II

I

II

II

II

Systolic BP (mm Hg)
Diastolic BP (mm Hg)

125
60

110
70

110
60

140
60

98
72

95
50

Loop diuretics

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

MRA

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

ACE-I/ARB

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

BB

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Tolvaptan Dose (mg)*

45

105

60

105

45

30

Follow-up (months)

20

5

30

4

22

19

Admission for HF (no)**

2/1

2/1

3/3

2/1

3/3

1/2

Admission for hypo*** (no)

1/0

0/0

3/2

0/0

0/0

0/0

Table 1: Basal characteristics and during the follow up of the patients in domiciliary treatment with Tolvaptan.

Etiology denotes the cause of the myocardiopathy: valv is valvular, chemo is post chemotherapy, isch is ischaemic and Hypert is hypertensive. 1, 3, 6 and 12 make reference to the months of the follow up.
LVSD denotes left ventricular systolic dysfunction, MRA mineral corticoid receptor antagonist, ACE-I angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin receptor antagonists, BB beta blockers.
*Week Tolvaptan dose at the beginning of the domiciliary treatment.
**Number of admission because of HF before and after treatment with Tolvaptan
**Number of admission because of symptomatic hyponatremia before and after treatment with Tolaptan

Sodium levels, as well as K and MDRD, were stable during Tolvaptan treatment (Figure 1), although there were not statistically significant differences. Also, weigh was stable during the follow-up, without statistical differences. The number of admissions was slightly reduced, especially because of symptomatic hyponatremia, although there were no statistically significant differences (Table 1). None of the patients reported important adverse effects related to Tolvaptan except thirst.
Figure 1: Evolution of analytical values (Na, K, MDRD) and weight in patients in chronic treatment with Tolvaptan during the follow-up.

Discussion

Hyponatremia is one of the most common electrolytic disorders in HF, related not only to poor prognosis in these patients [1], but also with unsteadiness, falls, and attention deficitsspecially in elder people [5]. Its adequate management, even at home, remains an important issue. After the publication of some studies, specially the EVEREST, in which the effectiveness of Tolvaptan in increasing Na levels and diuresis (without affecting other electrolytes or renal function) was proved [6], it has been included in current HF guidelines [1,2]. Moreover, because of it’s a quaretic effect, it could be an alternative to associate to loop diuretics to stabilize Na levels and congestion signs in HF patients.
In our patients, chronic treatment was started after at least two admissions with de compensated HF and hyponatremia treated with standard management and Tolvaptan, in order to maintain or increase Na levels. In fact, we started it in two patients with normal Na but with past history of refractory hyponatremia controlled with Tolvaptan. Sodium levels, through domiciliary treatment with Tolvaptan, were maintained stable as shown in (Figure 1), although there were no statistically significant differences probably because of the small sample size. On the other hand, potassium, renal function and weight, did not worsen significantly during the follow-up.
Therefore, Tolvaptan could be a good alternative added to chronic treatment of HF, especially loop diuretics, to maintain patient status, as reported in previous trials [7]. The only side effect linked to Tolvaptan was thirst, probably related to habitual water restriction in HF and other diuretics intake. There were not hepatic enzymes alterations or other side effects of the reported ones in the drug technical document to discontinue the treatment [4].

Conclusion

According to our results, domiciliary treatment with Tolvaptan, with HF nurses support, even in long term administration, is safe and helpful in chronic HF management. It could be considered in association with the standard treatment to maintain chronic status of these patients, especially in those with advanced HF, high diuretic requirements and persistent hyponatremia. Nevertheless, new trials should be performed to study the utility of Tolvaptan in this context.

References

  1. Hopkins PN, Williams RR (1986) Identification and relative weight of cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiol Clin 4(1): 3-31.
  2. Leone A (2011) Smoking and Hypertension: Independent or additive effects to determining vascular damage? CurrVascPharmacol 9(5): 585-593.
  3. Ockene IS, Houston Miller N (1997) Cigarette smoking, cardiovascular disease, and stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. American Heart Association Task Force on Risk Reduction. Circulation 96(9): 3243- 3247.
  4. Kannel WB (1996) Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor. Prevention and treatment. JAMA 275 (20): 1571-1576.
  5. Green MS, Jucha E, Luz Y (1986) Blood pressure in smokers and nonsmokers: epidemiologic findings. Am Heart J 111(5): 932-940.
  6. Leone A (2011) Does smoking act as a friend or enemy of blood pressure? Let release Pandora’s box. Cardiol Res Pract.
  7. Bloch MJ, Basile JN (2008) Analysis of recent papers in hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 10 (9): 735-737.
  8. Beto JA, Bansal VK (1992) Quality of life in treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Am J Hypertens 5(3): 125-133.
  9. Byrd JC (1992) Environmental tobacco smoke. Medical and legal issues. Med Clin North Am 76(2): 377-397.
  10. Dong L, Houdi AA, Van Loon GR (1991) Desensitization of central nicotinic cardiovascular effects by nicotine isomers and a quaternary analogue. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38 (4): 843-852.
  11. Xiu X, Puskar NL, Shanata JA, Lester HA, Dougherty DA (2009) Nicotine binding to brain receptors requires a strong cation-pi interaction. Nature 458 (7237): 534-537.
  12. Green WN, Wanamaker CP (1998) Formation of the acetylcholine receptor binding sites. J Neurosci 18 (15): 5555-5564.
  13. Leone A (2012) How and why chemicals from tobacco smoke can induce a rise in blood pressure. World J Pharmacol 1(1): 10-20.
  14. Hummel T, Hummel C, Pauli E, Kobal G (1992) Olfactory discrimination of nicotine-enantiomers by smokers and nonsmokers. Chem Senses 17(1): 13-21.
  15. Benowitz NL, Jacob P, Jones RT, Rosenberg J (1982) Interindividual variability in the metabolism and cardiovascular effects of nicotine in man.  J Pharmacol Exp Ther 221(2): 368-372.
  16. Turner DM, Armitage AK, Briant RH, Dollery CT (1975) Metabolism of nicotine by the isolated perfused dog lung. Xenobiotica 5(9): 539-551.
  17. Mizobe F, Livett BG (1983) Nicotine stimulates secretion of both catecholamines and acetylcholinesterase from cultured adrenal chromaffin cells. J Neurosci 3 (4): 871-876.
  18. Neunteufl T,  Heher S, Kostner K, Mitulovic  G,  Lehr S, et al. (2002) Contribution of nicotine to acute endothelial dysfunction in long-term smokers. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(2): 251-256.
  19. Celermajer DS, Adams MR, Clarkson P, Robinson J, McCredie R, et al. (1996) Passive smoking and impaired endothelium-dependent arterial dilation in healthy young adults. N Engl J Med 334(3): 150-154.
  20. Giannini D, Leone A, DiBisceglie D, Nuti M, Strata G, et al. (2007) The effects of acute passive smoke exposure on endothelium-dependent brachial artery dilation in healthy individuals. Angiology 58 (2): 211-217.
  21. Leone A (2014) Endothelial dysfunction in passive smokers. J Cardiol Curr Res 1(7): 00039.
  22. Mc Murray RG, Hicks LL, Thompson DL (1985) The effects of passive inhalation of cigarette smoke on exercise performance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 54(2): 196-200.
  23. Aronow WS (1978) Effect of passive smoking on angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 299(1): 21-24.
  24. Leone A, Mori L, Bertanelli F, Fabiano P, Filippelli M (1991) Indoor passive smoking: its effects on cardiac performance. Int J Cardiol 33(2): 247-251.
  25. Pimm PE, Silverman F, Shepard RJ (1978) Physiological effects of acute passive exposure to cigarette smoke. Arch Environ Health 33(4): 201-213.
  26. Leone A (2003) Relationship between cigarette smoking and other coronary risk factors in atherosclerosis: risk of cardiovascular disease and preventive measures. Curr Pharm Des 9(29): 2417-2423.
  27. Henderson Y, Haggard HW, Teague MC, Prince AL, Wunderlich RM (1921) Physiological effects of automobile exhaust gas and standards of ventilation for brief exposures. J IndHyg III(3): 79-92.
  28. Henderson Y, Haggard HW, Teague MC, Prince AL, Wunderlich RM (1921) Physiological effects of automobile exhaust gas and standards of ventilation for brief exposures. IV. Concordance of the standard here proposed with the observations of other investigators. J IndHyg III(4): 137-146.
  29. Jaffe DA, Griffin D RickerJ (1997) Analyzing Cigarette Smoke. The Science Teacher 64(9): 29-33.
  30. Leone A (2007) Biochemical markers of passive smoking. In: Passive Smoking and Cardiovascular Pathology. Mechanisms and Physiopathological Basis of Damage, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, USA, 19-37.
  31. Heiss C, Kleinbongard P, Dejam A, Perre S, Schroeter H, et al. (2005) Acute consumption of flavanol-rich cocoa and the reversal of endothelial dysfunction in smokers. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(7): 1276-1283.
  32. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Georgakopoulos D, Bull C, Thomas O, et al. (1993) Cigarette smoking is associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults. Circulation 88(5 pt 1): 2149-2155.
  33. Lekakis  J, Papamichael  C, Vemmos  C, Nanas J, Kontoyannis D, et al. (1997) Effect of acute cigarette smoking on endothelium-dependent brachial artery dilation in healthy individuals. Am J Cardiol 79(4): 529-531.
  34. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Miller OI, et al. (1992) Noninvasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet 340(8828): 1111-1115.
  35. Leone A (2012) Passive smoking, endothelial dysfunction and related markers in healthy individuals. An update. Current Hypertension Reviews 8: 141-150.
  36. Yarljoglues M, Kaya MG, Ardic I, Calapkorur B, Dogdu O, et al. (2010) Acute effects of passive smoking on blood pressure and heart rate in healthy females. Blood Press Monit 15(5): 251-256.
  37. Mahmud A, Feely J (2003) Effects of passive smoking on blood pressure and aortic pressure waveform in healthy young adults – influence of gender. Br J ClinPharmacol 57(1): 37-43.
  38. Hung J, Lam JYT, Lacoste L, Letchacovski G (1995) Cigarette smoking acutely increases platelet thrombus formation in patients with coronary artery disease taking aspirin. Circulation 92(9): 2432-2436.
  39. Hioki Y, Aoki K, Kawano K, Homori M, Hasumura Y, et al. (2001) Acute effects of cigarette smoking on platelet-dependent thrombin generation. Eur Heart J 22(1): 56-61.
  40. Leone A, Landini L, Biadi O, Balbarini A (2008) Smoking and cardiovascular system: cellular features of the damage. Curr Pharm Des 14(18): 1771-1777.
  41. Leone A (1993) Cardiovascular damage from smoking: a fact or belief? Int J Cardiol 38(2): 113-117.
  42. Grines CL, Topol EJ, O’Neill WW, George BS, Kereiakes D, et al. (1995) Effect of cigarette smoking on outcome after thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction. Circulation 91(2): 298-303.
  43. Iversen B, Jacobsen BK, Lochen ML (2013) Active and passive smoking and the risk of myocardial infarction in 24,968 men and women during 11 year of follow-up: the Tromso Study. Eur J Epidemiol 28(8): 659-667.
  44. Eliot RS, Baroldi G, Leone A (1974) Necropsy studies in myocardial infarction with minimal or no coronary luminal reduction due to atherosclerosis. Circulation 49(6): 1127-1131.
  45. Leone A (2014) Relation between coronary lesions and cigarette smoking of subjects deceased from acute myocardial infarction. A Histopathological study. J Cardiobiol 2(2): 5.
  46. Nunez MAL (1990) Myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries after acute exposure to carbon monoxide. Chest 97(2): 491-494.
  47. Quillen JE, Rossen JD, Oskarsson HJ, Minor RL Jr, Lopez AJG, et al. (1993) Acute effect of cigarette smoking on the coronary circulation: constriction of epicardial and resistance vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol 22(3): 642-647.
  48. Huikuri HV, Exner DV, Kiviniemi A, Tulppo M, Raatikainen P, et al. (2008) Recovery of Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction after Acute Myocardial Infarction as a Predictor of Fatal of Near-Fatal Arrhythmic Events. Circulation 118: S 675.
  49. Canto JC, Shlipak MG, Rogers WJ, Malmgren JA, Frederick PD, et al. (2000). Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. JAMA 283(24): 3223-3229.
  50. Howard G, Wagenknecht LE, Burke GL, Diez-Roux A, Evans GW, et al. (1998) Cigarette smoking and progression of atherosclerosis: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. JAMA 279(2): 119-124.
  51. Witterman JC, Grobbee DE, Valkenburg HA, van Hemert AM, Stijnen T, et al. (1993) Cigarette smoking and the development and progression of aortic atherosclerosis. A 9-year population-based follow-up study in women. Circulation 88(5 pt 1): 2156-2162.
  52. Leone A, Landini L (2013) Vascular pathology from smoking: look at the microcirculation. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 11(4): 524-530.
  53. Leone A (2011) Modifying cardiovascular risk factors: Epidemiology and characteristics of hypertension-related disorders. Curr Pharm Des 17(28): 2948-2954.
  54. Laragh JH, Brenner BM (1990) Hypertension. Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. (1st edn), Raven Press, New York, USA.
  55. World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension Writing Group (2003). Statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 21(11): 1983-1992.
  56. Sowers JR, Epstein M, Frohlich ED (2001) Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. An update. Hypertens 37(4): 1053-1059.
  57. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R (2002) Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 360(9349): 1903-1913.
  58. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Evans JC, O’Donnel CJ, et al. (2001) Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 345(18): 1291-1297.
  59. Lloyd-Jones DM, Evans JC, Larson MG, Levy D (2002) Treatment and control of hypertension in the community: A prospective analysis. Hypertens 40(5): 640-646.
  60. Salvetti A, Versari D (2003) Control of blood pressure in the community: an unsolved problem. Curr Pharm Des 9(29): 2375-2384.
  61. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents (1967) I. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 115 through 129 mmHg. JAMA 202: 1028-1034.
  62. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group (2002) Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker  vs diuretic. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 288(23): 2981-2997.
  63. Nadar S, Lim HS, Lip GY (2003) Implications of the LIFE trial. ExpOpinInvestig Drugs 12(5): 871-877.
  64. PROGRESS Collaborative Group (2001) Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 358(9287): 1033-1041.
  65. The ONTARGET Investigators (2008) Telmisartan, Ramipril or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med 358(15): 1547-1559.
  66. Armstrong PW, Alexander KP (2009) Nebivolol in older adults with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(23): 2159-2161.
  67. Stamler J (1967) Lectures on Preventive Cardiology. Grune & Stratton, New York, USA.
  68. Hughes K, Leong WP, Sothy SP, Lun KC, Yeo PPB (1993) Relationship between cigarette smoking, blood pressure and serum lipids in the Singapore general population. Int J Epidemiol 22(4): 637-643.
  69. Karvonen M, Orma E, Keys A, Fidanza F, Brozek J (1959) Cigarette smoking, serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and body fatness observations in Finland. The Lancet  273(7071): 492-494.
  70. Ballantyne D, Devine BL, Fife R (1978) Interrelation of age, obesity, cigarette smoking, and blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Br Med J 1(6117): 880-881.
  71. Higgins MW, Kjelsberg M (1967) Characteristics of smokers and nonsmokers in in Tecumseh, Michigan. II. The distribution of selected physical measurements and physiologic variables and the prevalence  of certain diseases in smokers and nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol 86(1): 60-77.
  72. Seltzer CC (1974) Effect of smoking on blood pressure. Am Heart  87(5): 558-564.
  73. Leone A, Lopez M, Picerno G (1984) Il ruolo del fumo nel determinismo della cardiopatia coronarica. Ipotesi sul possibile meccanismo di danno miocardico. Min Cardioang 32: 435-439.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2015 Fernande, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.