Submit manuscript...
International Journal of
eISSN: 2574-9889

Pregnancy & Child Birth

Mini Review Volume 6 Issue 4

Systemic lupus erythematosus and preconception care 

Brinderjeet Kaur

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Durlabhji Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, India

Correspondence: Brinderjeet Kaur, Department of Obstetric sand Gynecology, DurlabhjiMemorial Hospital and Research Centre, Santokba, India

Received: August 09, 2020 | Published: August 12, 2020

Citation: Kaur B. Systemic lupus erythematosus and preconception care. Int J Pregn & Chi Birth 2020;6(4):99-102. DOI: 10.15406/ipcb.2020.06.00205

Download PDF

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that predominately affects women of reproductive age group. Pregnancy and its outcome are a major concern to most of the SLE patients. Concerns of the risk of disease flare during pregnancy and chances of fetal loss, adverse outcome to fetus and safety of the drugs used are to be addressed. The article emphasis the requirement and importance of pre pregnancy counseling in optimizing the maternal and fetal outcome in lupus pregnancy.

Keywords: systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE, pregnancy in SLE, flare

Abbreviations

SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; APS, anti-phospholipid syndrome; NSAIIDs, non steroid anti-inflammatory drugs

Introduction

SLE or sometimes referred to lupus, is a multisystem rheumatologic disease. Lupus is considered a chronic autoimmune disease that is distinguished by auto antibodies with certain clinical manifestations to the skin, joints, heart, kidney, lungs and /or nervous system. The diagnosis is aided by the use of classification criteria. The diagnostic criteria currently in use are 2. The first being American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Classification Criteria That require a patient meet at least 4 of the 11 criteria. The second being (SLICC) or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria. This requires at least 4 of the 17 criteria with at least 1 of the 11 clinical criteria and 1 of the 6 immunologic criteria , or patient has biopsy –proven lupus nephritis along with antinuclear antibodies (ANA ) or anti –double stranded (ds DNA ) antibodies.1–3 Table 1 shows the summary of diagnostic criteria for SLE.

ACR diagnostic criteria

SLCC diagnostic criteria 

Immunologic criteria 

Malar Flush

Acute Cutaneous Lupus

Positive ANA result

Discoid rash

Chronic Cutaneous lupus

Elevated ds DNA antibody

Photosensitivity

Non scarring Alopecia

Elevated anti –Sm antibody

Oral or nasal ulcers

Oral or Nasal Ulcers

Elevated antiphospholipid antibodies 

Pleuritis or pericarditis

Joint Disease (e.g Synovitis)

Low complement (C3, C4, CH50) 

Persistent Proteinuria > 0.5 g/d or ≥3 on urine dipstic test or cellular casts

Serositis (e.g Pleurisy or pleural effusion)

Direct Coombs test (in the absence of haemolytic anemia) 

Seizures or Psychosis

Renal (e.g red blood cell casts)

Nonerosive arthritis involving ≥2 joints

Neurologic
(e.g seizures or psychosis)

Haemolytic Anemia, Leukopenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia

Hemolytic anaemia 

Positive ANA test

Leukopenia or Lymphopenia 

Elevated anti- dsDNA, anti –Sm or
antiphospholipid antibodies 

Thrombocytopenia 

Table 1 Diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus1–3

Pregnancy and flares of SLE

Whether there is an increased risk of lupus flare during pregnancy when compared with those who are non pregnant is a subject of controversy. While some study4–6 claim increase incidence of flares during pregnancy other studies refute7–9 this. The cause for the discrepancy of results from these studies is multifactorial and probably related to the differences in the definition of lupus flares, assessment of disease activity, selection of the control group. Certain physiological changes that occur during pregnancy may be misinterpreted as flares for example palmar erythema , transient facial blush , increase in proteinuria due to increase in glomerular filtration rate, and postpartum alopecia. This may result in overestimation of the frequency of lupus flares during pregnancy. Therefore, modification of the commonly used disease activity indices has been proposed for the assessment of lupus activity during pregnancy.10 However, every SLE patient should be followed up during pregnancy under the assumption that there is a risk of flare.

Prediction of the time of flare during pregnancy is also difficult. However, studies have reported equal frequency of flares during the second and third trimester but no patients flared in the postpartum period.4 Probably the use of prophylactic steroid treatment in late pregnancy explains less or absence of postpartum flares.Overall, the result from several studies do not suggest lupus flares during pregnancy are exceedingly more severe than those occurring outside pregnancy.11,12 However, the high frequency of flares during pregnancy makes pregnant women with SLE to be at high risk and close monitoring for disease is mandatory throughout the pregnancy and puerperium.

Preconceptional counseling

Optimal timing for conception

A number of studies have demonstrated that active lupus at the time of conception was associated with a higher risk of disease flares during pregnancy. In SLE patients, pregnancy is best undertaken during periods of quiescent disease or remission for at least six months before conception.13 It has been proposed patients who have stabilization of renal function , resolution of urine sediment abnormalities, proteinuria of less than 1g per day, normalization of the C3 level for at least six months be regarded as having renal remission. As a general rule, the longer the patient is in the remission at the time of conception, higher is the chance that the pregnancy will have less chances of exacerbation.13

Baseline investigations

The baseline laboratory evaluation should be done before pregnancy which include complete blood count with platelet, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, liver function tests, anti Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB, anti-dsDNA, C3, C4,CH50, 24 hour urine protein, creatinine clearance or spot urine protein –to – creatinine ratio. Both complement and anti- dsDNA levels can help differentiate preeclampsia from lupus flare in pregnancy if a baseline is established.

Renal insufficiency

In the presence of moderate to severe renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.4 mg/dl) before pregnancy, the patient has a 43 % chance of worsening renal function and/or 10 % chance of irreversible renal decline.14,15 Renal function is not altered significantly with normal or mild renal insufficiency (creatinine <1.4 mg/dl).

Assessment of antiphospholipid antibodies

The panel of antibodies includes lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin immunoglobulin M/ immunoglobulin G (IgM/Ig G) and anti ᵝ2 –glycoprotein –I IgM/IgG, should be repeated in 12 weeks. Approximately 30% to 40 % of patients with SLE have antiphospholoipidantibodies.16 The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies however does not establish the diagnosis of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS). Regardless of the diagnosis, the patient with SLE should be started on low dose aspirin at the end of the first trimester, around 12 to 13 weeks gestation to reduce the risk of preeclampsia.

Teratogenic medication

Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are absolutely contraindicated in pregnancy. Cyclophosphamide is avoided in pregnancy, especially because it is associated with not only first trimester miscarriage but also fetal demise.17 Hydroxychloroquine is the safest and most effective medication for pregnant women with SLE. It is recommended to continue Hydroxychloroquine during pregnancy because there is some evidence that lupus activity and flares increase with its discontinuation.11,12 If patients are in remission on Azathioprine before pregnancy, then the medication should be continued during pregnancy. However, it should not be started right before pregnancy, as it has been associated with cardiac malformation.18 Corticosteroids are considered safe in pregnancy if necessary, for suppression of disease activity. Non steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIIDs) are typically avoided in pregnancy, but continued if beneficial for the patient. Patients should be monitored for oligohydroamnios with the administration of NSAIDs, and should be continued at 30 -32 weeks to avoid premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.19

Prenatal multivitamins

Multivitamins are recommended to start in thepreconception period. Vitamin E, Zinc, Vitamin A and Vitamin B are all beneficial in a lupus diet. Vitamin C can increase ability to absorb iron and is a goodsource of antioxidants. Vitamin D is especially important for patients with Lupus because they tend to avoid the sun and can result in lower absorption of Vitamin D. Calcium and vitamin D are known to reduce the risk of osteoporosis which is common in patients with lupus. Current studies are exploring onuse of Vitamin D to help relieve lupus symptoms. Furtherit has been seen, that patients are often on medicines like predisone which may lead to significant weight gain and predispose to osteoporosis. Regular, low impact exercise may off set weight gain and also improve health in general.

Multidisciplinary approach

Clear communication between the obstetrician and the rheumatologist is essential for optimal care of both mother and baby. Table 2 outlines the approach.

Preconception

Complete blood count

 

Creatinine, Blood urea Nitrogen

 

Anti RO/SSA, Anti La/SSB

 

Antiphospholipid antibodies

 

24 Hr urine protein or spot protein creatinine ratio

 

Complement levels

 

Start prenatal Vitamins

 

Discontinue Teratogenic medications

 

Continue Hydroxychloroquine

 

Recommend trying for pregnancy after 6 months of remission

 

Refer to maternal fetal medicine

First trimester

Obtain baseline laboratory evaluation 

 

Offer Genetic testing/screening 

 

Initial aspirin at the end of first trimester 

Second trimester

Begin Surveillance for Congenital heart block at 16 weeks in patients with positive SSA/SSB antibodies 

 

Anatomy Ultrasound 18- 22 weeks

 

Fetal echocardiography to look for CHB, fetal myocarditis, pericardial effusion, valvular regurgitation

 

Interval Growth Ultrasound 

 

Screen for gestational diabetes 

Third trimester

Continue Ultrasound Growth Scans 

 

Begin antenatal testing at 32 weeks, or sooner if indicated 

 

Monitor for signs and symptoms of Preeclampsia 

 

To consider corticosteroids if preterm delivery indicated 

Delivery

Delivery at 39+week, or sooner if clinically indicated 

 

Cesarean Section reserved for usual obstetric indications 

 

Give Stress –dose corticosterids, if indicated

 

Neonatal evaluation at the time of delivery15

Postpartum/
Contraception

Breast feeding encouraged 

 

To continue Corticosteroids/Hydroxychloroquin in postpartum period to avoid flare 

 

Combined hormonal contraceptives are contraindicated in those with positive or unknown antiphospholipid antibodies 

Table 2 Outline of pregnancy management for the patient with SLE

Neonatal lupus erythematous syndrome

NLE is a syndrome comprising of Congenital heartblock, transient photosensitive cutaneous lupus lesions, cytopenia, hepatic, and other systemic manifestation in children born to mother with SLE, Sjogren syndrome, or other rheumatic disease with a positive anti- Ro or anti –La antibodies.11,20 The pathogenesis is controversial. But circumstantial evidence has shown that placental transfer of these anti bodies occur during the second trimester and mediates immunological injuries to the fetalheart and the conduction system Once complete heart block is established, it is irreversible.21,22

Conclusion

Early Preconceptional counseling and antepartum surveillance are fundamental for a healthy pregnancy outcome. SLE being chronic inflammatory conditions which has implications for both mother and fetus. Appropriate management of the mothers’ illness andpreventing the ill effects to the fetus is to be addressed.Preconceptional planning forms the mainstay of the management.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Petri M,Orbari AM, Alarcon G. Derivation and Validation of Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erthematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012:64(8):2677–2686.
  2. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.Arthritis Rheum.1982;25:1271–1277.
  3. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum.1997;40:1725.
  4. Wong KL, Chan FY, Lee CP. Outcome of pregnancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151;269–273.
  5. Petri M, Howard D, Repke J. Frequency of lupus flares in pregnancy. The Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Centre experience. Arthritis Rheum.1991;34:1538–1545.
  6. RutzIrastorza G, Lima F, Alves J, et al. Inc reased rate of lupus flare during pregnancy and the puerperium : a prospective study of 78 pregnancies.Br J Rheumatol.1996;35:133–138.
  7. Lockshin MD, Reinitz E, Druzin ML, et al. Lupus pregnancy. Case control prospective study demonstrating absence of lupus exacerbation during or after pregnancy. Am J Med.1984;77:893–898.
  8. Mintz G, Niz J, Gutierrez G, et al. Lupus pregnancy. Prospective study of pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results of a multidisciplinary approach. J Rheumatol.1986;13:732–739.
  9. Urowitz MB, Gladman DD, Farewell VT, et al. Lupus and pregnancy studies. Arthritis Rheum.1993;36:1392–1397.
  10. Buyon JP, Kalunian KC, RamseyGoldman R, et al. Assessing disease activity in SLE patients during pregnancy. Lupus.1999;8:67–84.
  11. Lateef A, Petri M. Managing lupus patients during pregnancy. Best Praact Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27(3):435–437.
  12. Clowse M. Lupus ctivity in pregnancy.Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33(2):237–252.
  13. Clowse ME, Jamison M, Myers E, et al. A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):121–126.
  14. IsazaM. Systemic lupus erythematosus. In:Berghella V, editor. Maternal Fetal Evidence Based Guidelines. 3rd ed. London, England: CRCPress; 2017.
  15. Jones D, Hayslett J. Outcome of pregnancy in women with moderate or severe renal insufficiency. N Eng J Med.1996;335:226–232.
  16. Kumar V, Abbas A, Aster J. Autoimmune Diseases. Robbins &Cotran Pathologic Basis of Diseases. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2015.
  17. Clwse M, Magder I, Petri M, Cyclophosphoamide for lupus during pregnancy.Lupus. 2005;14(8):593–597.
  18. Cleary BJ, KallenB. Early pregnancy azathioprine use and pregnancy outcomes.Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85(7):647–654.
  19. Antonucci R, Zaffanello M, Puzeddu E, et al. Use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in pregnancy: impact on the fetus and newborn. Curr Drug Metab. 2012;13(4):474–490.
  20. Brucato A, Cinaz R, Caparali R. et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with autoimmune diseases and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2011;40(1):27–41.
  21. Kapur A, Dey M, Tangri M, et al. Maternal anti- Ro/SSA andanti-La/SSA antibodies and fetal congenital heart block. J ObstetGynaecol India. 2015;65(3):189–197.
  22. Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ,Homberger LK, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2014;129(21):2183–2242.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2020 Kaur. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.