Submit manuscript...
Advances in
eISSN: 2377-4290

Ophthalmology & Visual System

Opinion Volume 7 Issue 7

Differences between the Characteristics of Normal Tension Glaucoma and High Tension Glaucoma

Burak Turgut,1 Fatoş Altun Turgut2

1Department of Ophthalmology, Yuksek Ihtisas University, Turkey
2Elazig Training and Research Hospital, Turkey

Correspondence: Burak Turgut, Professor of Ophthalmology, YuksekIhtisas University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, 06520, Ankara, Turkey, Tel +90 312 2803601

Received: November 22, 2017 | Published: December 11, 2017

Citation: Turgut B, Turgut FA (2017) Differences between the Characteristics of Normal Tension Glaucoma and High Tension Glaucoma. Adv Ophthalmol Vis Syst 7(7): 00250. DOI: 10.15406/aovs.2017.07.00250

Download PDF

Abstract

Normal tension glaucoma is a type of primary open angle glaucoma in which the intraocular pressure is in the normal range. Although both normal tension glaucoma and high-tension glaucoma resemble clinically each other, there are some differences between both of them. In this editorial, I aim to summarize the differences between the characteristics of these glaucoma types. If these are well-known, the diagnosis and management of normal tension glaucoma will be easier.

Keywords: normal tension glaucoma, normal pressure glaucoma, normotensive glaucoma, high-pressure glaucoma, high tension glaucoma, differences, characteristics

Abbreviations

NTG, normal tension glaucoma; NPG, normal pressure glaucoma; POAG, primary open angle glaucoma; HPG, high pressure glaucoma; HTG, high tension glaucoma; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; OD, optic disc; RGCs, retinal ganglion Cells; IOP, intra-ocular pressure; GON, glaucomatous optic neuropathy; CNTGS, collaborative normal tension glaucoma study; ODH, optic disc hemorrhage; CCT, central cornea thickness; CSFP, cerebro-spinal fluid pressure; ONPP, optic nerve perfusion pressure; PVD, peripheral vascular dysregulation; OBF, ocular blood flow; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Editorial

Glaucoma is defined as a multifactorial and progressive optic neuropathy which usually caused by the effects of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) is characterized by the excavation of the optic nerve head (ONH), thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and the axons of by retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and eventually the specific loss of visual field (VF).1 Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common type of chronic progressive GON with the absence of the association of any ocular disease. POAG includes two types as ''high pressure glaucoma (HPG)/high-tension glaucoma (HTG)'' and normal-pressure glaucoma (NPG)/normal tension glaucoma (NTG).1–5 There are significant overlapping characteristics between both glaucoma types. However, they may be separated by some marked differences in the aspects of risk factors, pathogenesis, OD findings, RNFL thickness and VF defects.6–47 Comparison of the characteristics of both glaucoma types has been given in Table 1.

Characteristics

NTG

HTG

IOP

Normal with wide diurnal fluctuations, nocturnal spikes

High with normal range diurnal fluctuations                                                                                              

Sexual Predisposition                                                

Female

N/A

Possible Specific Risk Factor

ODH, ischemic/occlusive vascular disease
(Migraine, Raynaud, diabetes, cardiac arrhythmia, stroke)
addition to elevated IOP

High IOP (primary continuous causative risk factor), Genetic mutation, advanced age, black race, older age, systemical vascular diseases

Age

Older average 10 years than HPG

 

Usually over 50 years old

OD Sign

Narrow NRR, a larger OD surface area, thinner
inferior/inferotemporal NRR, deep, focal NRR thinning/notching, OD pit

Diffuse NRR thinning, classical GON signs

GON Pathogenesis

Neuro-degeneration, IOP-independent mechanisms
(LC weakness or abnormalities, abnormal easily triggered apoptosis,
low ONBP, low CSFP, local PVD, enhanced sensitivity to physiologic IOP,
hypotension, hematologic abnormalities)

Neurodegenerative and IOP-dependent mechanisms, vascular, genetic, and biochemical mechanisms

PPA

More frequently beta-zone PPA

Beta-zone PPA

ONPP

Frequently lower

Maybe lower

RNFLT Loss

Earlier, inferotemporal

N/A

VF Defects

More focal, central, deeper and closer to fixation

Deeper, superior nasal step, inferior and superior paracentral

Suggested VF testing protocol

10-2

30-2

CCT

Maybe thinner than average

N/A

Genetic Mutation in which

Optineurin

TIGR, Myocilin

Systemical BP

Increased diastolic BP and larger dips in BP overnight

N/A

ODH

More common

Less common

OBF

Strongly impaired

Maybe impaired

OSAS

Strongly associated

May be associated

Progression

Slower to HPG in the absence of beta-blocker treatment                                                  

N/A

Table 1 The comparison of the characteristics of NTG and HTG1,2,4,8,9,11,12,15-20,22–47

It has been considered that NTG might occur due to IOP-independent pathogenic factors such as peripheral vascular dysregulation (PVD), hypotension, mechanical factors such as lamina cribrosa (LC) abnormalities and weakness, and enhanced sensitivity of the optic nerve to physiologic IOP. However, CNTGS showed that a 30% or more reduction of the IOP value in normal range belonging the patient achieved a significant slowdown in the progression of the NTG.6 On the other hand, HTG is often an IOP-dependent glaucoma type. IOP plays a great role in the pathogenesis of this glaucoma typ.1 In conclusion, as seen in Table 1, compared to those with HTG, the common distinctive findings in the patients with NTG are an IOP value in normal range; female predisposition; optineurin gene mutation; thinner CCT; larger OD size; larger/deeper OD cupping; thinner LC; frequent NRR notching; earlier and focal RNFL loss; frequent beta zone peripapillary atrophy; frequent OD hemorrhage; frequent pit; deeper, closer to fixation, steeper slopes, more localized and central VF defects; peripheral vascular dysregulation (low nocturnal optic nerve perfusion pressure, cold extremities, impairments in the nail fold capillary, retinal and choroidal blood flow), ocular perfusion abnormalities and vasospastic/ischemic disorders in pathogenesis; associated hematologic abnormalities, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and blood loss.2,3,7–47

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Funding

None.

References

  1. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th edn, Chapter 2: Classification and terminology. Supported by the EGS Foundation. British J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(5):73–127.
  2. Mallick J, Devi L, Malik PK, et al. Update on Normal Tension Glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(2):204–208.
  3. Tsvi Sheleg. Normal-Tension (Low-Tension) Glaucoma, Glaucoma - Basic and Clinical Concepts. In: Rumelt S, editor. In Tech. 2011. p. 602.
  4. Pruzan NL, Myers JS. Phenotypic differences in normal vs high tension glaucoma. J Neuroophthalmol. 2015;35(Suppl 1):S4–S7.
  5. Mi XS, Yuan TF, So KF. The current research status of normal tension glaucoma. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1563–1571.
  6. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):498–505.
  7. Ng SK, Burdon KP, Fitzgerald JT, et al. Genetic Association at the 9p21 Glaucoma Locus Contributes to Sex Bias in Normal-Tension Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(7):3416–3421.
  8. Thonginnetra O, Greenstein VC, Chu D, et al. Normal versus High Tension Glaucoma: a Comparison of Functional and Structural Defects. J Glaucoma. 2010;19(3):151–157.
  9. Gutteridge IF. Normal tension glaucoma: diagnostic features and comparisons with primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom. 2000;83(3):161–172.
  10. Tomita G. The optic nerve head in normal-tension glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11(2):116–120.
  11. Tezel G, Kass MA, Kolker AE, et al. Comparative optic disc analysis in normal pressure glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology. 19996;103(12):2105–2113.
  12. Caprioli J, Spaeth GL. Comparison of the optic nerve head in high- and low-tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(8):1145–1149.
  13. Buus DR, Anderson DR. Peripapillary crescents and halos in normal-tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(1):16–19.
  14. Yamazaki Y, Hayamizu F, Miyamoto S, et al. Optic disc findings in normal tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1997;41(4):260–267.
  15. Shields MB. Normal-tension glaucoma: is it different from primary open-angle glaucoma? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(2):85–88.
  16. Shetgar AC, Mulimani MB. The central corneal thickness in normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(6):1063–1067.
  17. Ahrlich KG, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, et al. Visual field progression differences between normal-tension and exfoliative high-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(3):1458–1463.
  18. Araie M. Pattern of visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995;6(2):36–45.
  19. Park JH, Yoo C, Park J, et al. Visual Field Defects in Young Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma: Comparison Between High-tension and Normal-tension Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(6):541–547.
  20. Iester M, De Feo F, Douglas GR. Visual Field Loss Morphology in High- and Normal-Tension Glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2012;327326.
  21. Shin IH, Kang SY, Hong S, et al. Comparison of OCT and HRT Findings among Normal Tension Glaucoma, and High Tension Glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2008;22(4):236–241.
  22. Eid TE, Spaeth GL, Moster MR, et al. Quantitative Differences between the Optic Nerve Head and Peripapillary Retina in Low-Tension Glaucoma and High-Tension Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(6):805–813.
  23. Lee JY, Yoo C, Park JH, et al. Retinal vessel diameter in young patients with open-angle glaucoma: comparison between high-tension and normal-tension glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(7):570–571.
  24. Mroczkowska S, Benavente-Perez A, Negi A, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma vs normal-tension glaucoma: the vascular perspective. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(1):36–43.
  25. Harris A, Evans D, Martin B, et al. Effect of nocturnal blood pressure reduction on retrobulbar hemodynamics in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240(10):867–868.
  26. Schwenn O, Troost R, Vogel A, et al. Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Patients with Open Angle Glaucoma, Normal Tension Glaucoma, and Ocular Hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(9):981–984.
  27. Kim C, Kim TW. Comparison of risk factors for bilateral and unilateral eye involvement in normal-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1215–1220.
  28. Meyer JH, Brandi-Dohrn J, Funk J. Twenty four hour blood pressure monitoring in normal tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(10):864–847.
  29. Flammer J, Orgül S, Costa VP, et al. The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21(4):359–393.
  30. Okuno T, Sugiyama T, Kojima S, et al. Diurnal Variation in Microcirculation of Ocular Fundus and Visual Field Change in Normal-Tension Glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2004;18(7):697–702.
  31. Plange N, Remky A, Arend O. Colour Doppler Imaging and Fluorescein Filling Defects of the Optic Disc in Normal Tension Glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(6):731–736.
  32. Sung KR, Lee S, Park SB, et al. Twenty-four Hour ocular Perfusion Pressure Fluctuation and Risk of Normal-Tension Glaucoma Progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(11):5266–5274.
  33. Chang M, Yoo C, Kim SW, et al. Retinal Vessel Diameter, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, and Intraocular Pressure in Korean Patients with Normal-Tension Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(1):100–105.
  34. Leske MC. Ocular perfusion pressure and glaucoma: clinical trial and epidemiologic findings. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(2):73–78.
  35. Flammer J, Konieczka K, Flammer AJ. The primary vascular dysregulation syndrome: implications for eye diseases. EPMA J. 2013;4(1):14.
  36. Ramli N, Nurull BS, Hairi NN, et al. Low nocturnal ocular perfusion pressure as a risk factor for normal tension glaucoma. Prev Med. 2013;57(Suppl):S47–S49.
  37. Berdahl JP, Allingham RR. Intracranial pressure and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21(2):106–111.
  38. Mansouri K, Liu JH, Weinreb RN, et al. Analysis of continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure patterns in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(13):8050–8056.
  39. Phelps CD, Corbett JJ. Migraine, and low-tension glaucoma. A case-control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(8):1105–1108.
  40. Hirooka K, Tenkumo K, Fujiwara A, et al. Evaluation of peripapillary choroidal thickness in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012;12:29.
  41. Kim SH, Park KH. The relationship between recurrent optic disc hemorrhage and glaucoma progression. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(4):598–602.
  42. Ishida K, Yamamoto T, Sugiyama K, et al. Disk hemorrhage is a significantly negative prognostic factor in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129(6):707–714.
  43. Javitt JC, Spaeth GL, Katz LJ, et al. Acquired pits of the optic nerve: Increased prevalence in patients with low-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;97(8):1038–1043.
  44. Ugurlu S, Weitzman M, Nduaguba C, et al. Acquired pit of the optic nerve: A risk factor for progression of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(4):457–464.
  45. Cheng HC, Chan CM, Yeh SI, et al. The Hemorheological Mechanisms in Normal Tension Glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36(7):647–653.
  46. Mojon DS, Hess CW, Goldblum D, et al. Normal-tension glaucoma is associated with sleep apnea syndrome. Ophthalmologica. 2002;216(3):180–184.
  47. Bilgin G. Normal-tension glaucoma and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a prospective study. BMC Ophthalmology. 2014;14:27.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Turgut, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.