Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2577-8285

Sleep Medicine and Disorders: International Journal

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 1

High risk of obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome: prevalence and associated factors in a Cameroonian urban population using the STOPBANG questionnaire

Massongo Massongo,1 Bitchong Ekono Claire Francoise,2,3 Bassogbag Rutha,3 Afane Ze Emmanuel1,3

1Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, University of Yaounde, Cameroon
2Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Douala, Cameroon
3Respiratory Medicine B, Jamot Hospital of Yaounde, Cameroon

Correspondence: Massongo Massongo, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde 1, PO Box 1364, Yaounde, Cameroon, Tel +237 690 660 007

Received: January 19, 2020 | Published: January 28, 2020

Citation: Massongo M, Françoise BEC, Rutha B, et al. High risk of obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome: prevalence and associated factors in a Cameroonian urban population using the STOPBANG questionnaire.Sleep Med Dis Int J. 2020;4(1):6-12. DOI: 10.15406/smdij.2020.04.00065

Download PDF

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) in sub-Saharan Africa. Effective diagnostic tools are still scarce and expensive in this region. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors associated to the high risk of OSAHS (HR-OSAHS) in a sub-Saharan African population.

Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted from November 2015 to May 2016 in Yaoundé, the capital of Cameroon. Adults aged >16 years were recruited from 4 districts and 4 administrative buildings. Data were collected during a face-to-face interview. The HR-OSAHS was defined by a STOPBANG score ≥3. Logistic regression was used to determine the HR-OSAHS associated factors via adjusted odds ratio (aOR), with a significance level of 5%. Data were digitized and analyzed using Epi data version 3.1 and Stata version 12.0 respectively.

Results: Four hundreds persons were enrolled in the study. Their Mean age was 34.8±11.2 years and 228 of them (57%) were men. All of the participants lived in Yaoundé and its surroundings and 2/3 had a sedentary activity profile. The most common symptoms (with more than 30% of frequency each) were decreased concentration (44.5%), daytime sleepiness (39.7%) and arousals (39.0%), daytime asthenia (33.2%), snoring (30.5%) and morning headache (30.2%). The HR-OSAHS prevalence was 24.5% (20.5 - 28.9)%. Its associated factors [OR (95% confidence interval), p-value] were Mallampati score ≥3 [4.8 (2.2, 10.2), <0.001], parents hypertension [2.6 (1.5, 4.4), <0.001], macroglossia [2.2 (1.2, 4.0), 0.007], decreased libido [1.9 (1.1, 3.5), 0.033] and insomnia [1.7 (1.3, 3.1), 0.051].

Conclusion: HR-OSAHS is common in this urban sub-Saharan African population, and its associated factors are consistent with OSAHS features. This suggests a good sensitivity of the STOPBANG in this population.

Keywords: high risk, OSAHS, prevalence, associated factors, Cameroon, STOPBANG

Abbreviations

OSAHS, obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome; AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; LIC, low income countries; SSA, sub-Saharan Africa; HR-OSAHS, high risk of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome; ESS, epworth sleepiness scale; HBP, high blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; c/aOR, crude/adjusted odds ratio

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is a frequent and serious condition, given the cardiovascular and accidental risks.1–5 Data on OSAHS come mainly from developed countries, where diagnostic and therapeutic tools are codified and accessible for the majority. In low-income country (LIC) and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) especially, the condition remains unknown by the population and most of the caregivers, while the epidemiological transition leads to an increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases.6,7 Diagnostic devices can be found only in specialized centers of large cities. The few studies available in sub-Saharan Africa have focused on the high risk of OSAHS (HR-OSAHS), based on easy-to-use screening tools.8–10 This study was designed to enrich fundamental and epidemiological data on OSAHS in SSA. The aim was to assess the prevalence of OSAHS symptoms and high-risk based on the STOPBANG questionnaire, and to search for its associated factors in a Cameroonian urban population.

Material and methods

Study design and population

The study took place in Yaoundé, the political capital of Cameroon, between November 2015 and May 2016. It was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee for Research on Human Health, at the University of Douala. Black subjects aged 16 or over and living in the city and its surroundings were asked to participate. Those with a history of OSAHS, shift work or pregnancy were excluded from the study. We selected the population study using a two-stage clusters stratified sampling. The stratification variable was the type of activity, divided into office activity (administrative buildings) and outdoor activity (neighborhoods and / or markets). In the office activity group: 2 buildings in the city (Ministry of Higher Education and National Institute of Youth and Sport) were first chosen by convenience, then one or more services from each institution were randomly chosen, and all the members of the selected services were systematically invited to participate to the study, until the desired number of participants was obtained. In the outdoor activity group: 4 districts (Omnisport, Essos, Tropicana and Ekounou) were chosen by convenience among the most popular and endowed with significant external activity (markets, street vendors, manual workers). Then the streets of each district were crossed, and the questionnaire was proposed to all working adults encountered. The required sample size was calculated using the Statcalc function of Epi Info 7 software. Considering a 35% HR-OSAHS prevalence found by Ozoh in Nigeria 1 year ago,8 a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence interval, the required sample size was 350 subjects.

Instruments and administration

Data were collected during a face-to-face interview, after a written consent was obtained from each respondent. Seventh year medical students specifically trained for the purpose conducted the interviews. The questionnaire included data on: socio-demographic features (age, gender, place of residence, marital status), lifestyle and habits (occupation, toxics and drugs consumptions, activity profile using the Ricci and Gagnon auto test), personal and family medical history (particularly cardiovascular and metabolic conditions), symptoms enquiry, physical examination (including tongue examination and Mallampati score for upper airways assessment), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) for daytime sleepiness assessment, and STOPBANG score for HR-OSAHS.

The STOPBANG is a screening tool developed in a Caucasian population, and includes 8 items worth 1 point each: 1) Snoring, 2) daytime Tiredness, 3) Observed apnea, 4) high blood Pressure (HBP), 5) Body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 (obesity), 6) Age >50 years, 7) Neck circumference >40 cm, and 8) male Gender.11,12 In the original population the sensitivity of a STOPBANG score ≥3 was 93% for moderate OSAHS (apnea hypopnea index [AHI] =15–30/hour) detection and 100% for severe one (AHI >30/h).12 The Ricci and Gagnon test is an 8-questions auto tests on daily (4 questions) and sportive or leisure (4 questions) activities, which results into 3 profiles: inactive (score<18), active (score 18–35) and very active (score>35).13 The ESS evaluates the sleepiness risk in 8 different daily situations. Each item is coated 0 to 3, for a total score of 0 to 24. Excessive daytime sleepiness is defined by an ESS >10.14 The Mallampati was developed to help clinicians predicting the difficulty of intubation. It classifies upper airways opening from class 1 (soft palate, fauces, uvula and pillars are all visible) to class IV (soft palate is not visible at all).15 Snoring, tiredness, breathing pauses, history of HBP and the age were reported by the participant. BMI (expressed in kg/m2) was calculated using the formula weight/(height)2. An electronic scale gave the weight and the height was obtained using a locally wood-made rod. A usual tape was used to measure the neck circumference.

Data analysis

Continuous variables were expressed in mean±standard deviation. The OSAHS symptoms and HR-OSAHS prevalence’s were expressed in % with their 95% confidence interval (95%CI). The HR-OSAHS was defined as a STOPBANG score ≥3. We sought the HR-OSAHS associated factors among socio-demographic, anamnestic and clinical data, using a sequential binomial logistic regression. All factors with a p-value <0% on univariate analysis were eligible for the multivariate analysis. From these eligible factors we excluded: 1) those involved in the STOPBANG score calculation as to prevent an information bias, since they were part of the depending variable; 2) those with aberrant values (such as very few or no subject for one or more modality, too large 95% CI, etc.), since they disturbed the models stability; and 3) those without demonstrated or plausible association with OSAHS. The remaining eligible factors underwent successive logistic regression models, following a step-down strategy, with a .05 threshold. The strength of the association was assessed by the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and its 95% confidence interval. Epidata version 3.1 was used to digitize data. Stata version 12.0 and R Studio version 1.2.1335 version were used for data analysis.

Results

Baseline characteristics of study participants

A total of 400 subjects were enrolled in our study, including 228 men (sex ratio=1.3). They had a mean age of 34.8±11.2 years. Two-fifths (41.3%) of them were aged 25 to 34 years and the extreme ages were 16 and 86. The place of residence was exclusively urban (69.5%) or Peri-urban (30.5%). The occupation was considered as physically inactive (office worker or no occupation) for 62.8% of the sample. Alcohol consumption and known HBP were present in nearly half and a third of them respectively, while almost 40% were obese or overweight. A few proportion of respondents confessed illegal drugs consumption Table 1.

Characteristic

Modality

Values

Age, years

Mean+/-standard deviation

34,8±11,1

Extrems

16–86

Sex, number

men/women

228/172

Place of residence

Urban

278 (69.5%)

Peri-urban

122 (30.5%)

Occupation type

Manual worker

130 (32.5%)

Itinerant worker

19 (4.7%)

Office worker

243 (60.8%)

No activity

8 (2.0%)

Activity score (Nina and Gagnon)

Inactive

18 (4.5%)

Active

375 (93.7%)

Very active

7 (1.8%)

History of high blood pressure

138 (34.5%)

Alcohol consumption

196 (49.0%)

Tobacco consumption

21 (5.2%)

Coffee consumption

142 (35.5%)

Illegal drug consumption

7 (1.7%)

Psychotropic medication

21 (5.2%)

Weight category (N=310)

Thin

12 (3.9%)

Normal weight

178 (57.4%)

Overweight

80 (25.8%)

Obese

40 (12.9%)

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of subjects enrolled in the study on the epidemiology of the high risk of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, Yaoundé, November 2015- May 2016. N=400 (except for the weight category)

Sleep related symptoms

Decreased concentration (44.5%), sleepiness (39.7%) and tiredness (33.2%) were the commonest daytime symptoms, while arousals (39.0%) and snoring (30.5%) were predominant during the night. OSAHS specific symptoms such as sleep breathing pauses (4.2%) were not frequent. More symptoms are detailed in Table 2. The prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness diagnosed by ESS >10 was 21.0 % (17.0, 25.0) %.

Symptoms

Number

Prevalence (95% CI), %

Decreased concentration

178

44.5 (39.7, 49.4)

Daytime sleepiness

159

39.7 (34.9, 44.5)

Arousals

156

39.0 (34.3, 43.9)

Tiredness

133

33.2 (28.8, 38.0)

Snoring

122

30.5 (26.2, 35.2)

Morning headache

121

30.2 (25.9, 34.9)

Insomnia

109

27.2 (23.1, 31.9)

Night sweats

93

23.2 (19.1, 27.3)

Decreased libido

82

20.5 (16.8, 24.8)

Restless sleep

46

11.5 (8.4, 14.6)

Nocturia

33

8.2 (5.9, 11.4)

Sleep suffocations

21

5.2 (3.5, 7.9)

Sleep breathing pauses

17

4.2 (2.7, 6.7)

Table 2 Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome’s symptoms among adults in Yaoundé, November 2015–May 2016, N=400

Prevalence and determinants of HR-OSAHS

Of the 400 subjects studied, 98 had a STOPBANG score ≥3. The corresponding prevalence (95% CI) was 24.5% (20.5-28.9)%. In univariate analysis, several factors were associated to the HR-OSAHS with a p-value <0.10. These included most of those involved in the STOPBANG score (age>50 years, male status, hypertension, snoring, daytime asthenia, cervical perimeter and obesity). All of those factors are detailed in Table 3. After exclusion of inappropriate factors (as indicated in “Material and methods” section), 15 variables were eligible for the multivariate analysis. At the end of sequential multiple logistic regression analysis, 5 variables were found to be independent OH-OSAHS associated factors: parent history of HBP, insomnia, decreased libido, a Mallampati score ≥3 and macroglossia. The strongest association occurred with macroglossia [OR (95% CI)=4.8 (2.2, 10.2), p<0.001]. The OR ranged 1.6 to 4.8 Table 4.

Variable group

Variables

Sample size

HR-OSAHS, number (%)

cOR (95% CI)

p-value

Socio-demographic

Age (years)

<25

63

6 (9.5)

0.3 (0.1 , 0.7)

<0.01

25-34

165

29 (17.6)

0.5 (0.3, 0.8)

<0.01

55-64

26

17 (65.4)

6.8 (2.9, 15.9)

<0.01

Gender

Men

228

76 (33.3)

3.4 (2.0, 5.8)

<0.01

Woman

172

22 (12.8)

1

Personal history

Cardiovascular disease

Yes

30

24 (80.0)

16.0 (6.3, 40.6)

<0.01

No

370

74 (20.0)

1

Personal HBP

Yes

27

22 (81.5)

17.2 (6.3, 46.9)

<0.01

No

373

76 (20.4)

1

Gastroesophageal reflux

Yes

5

4 (80.0)

12.8 (1.4, 116.0)

0.01

No

395

94 (23.8)

1

Alcohol consumption

Yes

196

57 (29.1)

1.6 (1.0, 2.6)

0.02

No

204

41 (20.1)

1

Family history

Parents HBP

Yes

138

54 (39.1)

3.2 (2.0, 5.1)

<0.01

No

262

44 (16.8)

1

Parents insomnia

Yes

81

28 (34.6)

1.9 (1.1, 3.2)

No

319

70 (21.9)

1

Sibling obesity

Yes

30

12 (40.0)

2.2 (1.0, 4.8)

0.03

No

370

86 (23.2)

1

Siblings snoring

Yes

122

45 (36.9)

2.5 (1.5, 4.0)

<0.01

No

278

53 (19.1)

1

Siblings HBP

Yes

37

20 (54.1)

4.3 (2.1, 8.6)

<0.01

No

363

78 (21.5)

1

Siblings insomnia

Yes

27

14 (51.9)

3.7 (1.7, 8.2)

No

373

84 (22.5)

1

Descendants obesity

Yes

6

4 (66.7)

6.4 (1.2, 35.4)

0.03

No

394

94 (23.9)

1

Descendants snoring

Yes

34

14 (41.2)

2.3 (1.1, 4.9)

0.01

No

366

84 (23.0)

1

Descendants HBP

Yes

34

21 (61.8)

6.1 (2.9, 12.7)

<0.01

No

366

77 (21.0)

1

Night symptoms

Snoring

Yes

160

60 (37.5)

3.2 (2.0, 5.1)

<0.01

No

240

38 (15.8)

1

Observed apnea

Yes

17

7 (41.2)

2.2 (0.8, 6.1)

0.09

No

383

91 (23.8)

1

Nocturia

Yes

33

13 (39.4)

2.1 (1.0, 4.5)

0.03

No

367

85 (23.2)

1

Arousals

Yes

156

47 (30.1)

1.6 (1.0, 2.6)

0.02

No

244

51 (20.9)

1

Suffocations

Yes

21

9 (42.9)

2.4 (1.0, 6.0)

0.04

No

379

89 (23.5)

1

Insomnia

Yes

109

37 (33.9)

1.9 (1.2, 3.2)

<0.01

No

291

61 (21.0)

1

Sweats

Yes

93

31 (33.3)

1.8 (1.1, 3.0)

0.01

No

307

67 (21.8)

1

Daytime symptoms

Sleepiness

Yes

159

49 (30.8)

1.7 (1.1, 2.8)

0.01

No

241

49 (20.3)

1

Tiredness

Yes

138

48 (34.8)

2.3 (1.4, 3.6)

<0.01

No

262

50 (19.1)

1

Decreased concentration

Yes

178

56 (31.5)

2.9 (1.2, 3.1)

<0.01

No

222

42 (18.9)

1

Decreased libido

Yes

82

34 (41.5)

2.8 (1.7, 4.7)

<0.01

No

318

64 (20.1)

1

Polyphagia

Yes

16

7 (43.8)

2.5 (0.9, 6.9)

0.06

No

384

91(23.7)

1

Polydipsia

Yes

44

17 (38.6)

2.1 (1.1, 4.1)

0.01

No

356

81 (22.8)

1

Physical findings

Weight category

Obese

32

17 (53.1)

4.0 (1.9, 8.3)

<0.01

Overweight

80

30 (37.5)

2.2 (1.3

Thin

12

0 (0)

/

Normal

176

28 (15.9)

1

Neck circumference

>40 cm

68

41 (60.3)

7.3 (4.2, 12.9)

<0.01

≤40 cm

332

57 (17.2)

1

Macroglossia

Yes

135

59 (43.7)

4.5 (2.8, 7.3)

<0.01

No

265

39 (14.7)

1

Scores

Epworth

24-Nov

84

27 (32.1)

1.6 (0.9, 2.7)

0.06

0 - 10

316

71 (22.5)

1

Ricci & Gagnon

Inactive

18

8 (44.4)

2.6 (1.0, 6.8)

0.04

Active or very active

382

90 (23.6)

1

Mallampati

4-Mar

49

32 (65.3)

8.1 (4.5, 15.5)

<0.01

2-Jan

351

66 (18.8)

1

Table 3 Factors associated to high risk of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (HR-OSAHS), frequencies and crude odd ratios (cOR) with their 95% confident interval (95% CI) after univariate analysis, among adults in Yaoundé, November 2015–May 2016
HBP, high blood pressure

Variable

Univariate analysis

Final model

Sample size

HR-OSAHS, number (%)

cOR (95% CI)

p-value

aOR (95% CI)

p-value

Inactive profile

Yes

18

8 (44.4)

2.6 (1.0, 6.8)

0.04

No

382

90 (23.6)

1

Alcohol consumption

Yes

196

57 (29.1)

1.6 (1.0, 2.6)

0.02

No

204

41 (20.1)

1

Parents HBP

Yes

138

54 (39.1)

3.2 (2.0, 5.1)

<0.01

2.6 (1.5, 4.4)

<0.001

No

262

44 (16.8)

1

1

Siblings HBP

Yes

37

20 (54.1)

4.3 (2.1, 8.6)

<0.01

No

363

78 (21.5)

1

Nocturia

Yes

33

13 (39.4)

2.1 (1.0, 4.5)

0.03

No

367

85 (23.2)

1

Arousals

Yes

156

47 (30.1)

1.6 (1.0, 2.6)

0.02

No

244

51 (20.9)

1

Suffocations

Yes

21

9 (42.9)

2.4 (1.0, 6.0)

0.04

No

379

89 (23.5)

1

Insomnia

Yes

109

37 (33.9)

1.9 (1.2, 3.2)

<0.01

1.7 (1.3, 3.1)

0.051

No

291

61 (21.0)

1

1

Sweats

Yes

93

31 (33.3)

1.8 (1.1, 3.0)

0.01

No

307

67 (21.8)

1

Sleepiness

Yes

159

49 (30.8)

1.7 (1.1, 2.8)

0.01

No

241

49 (20.3)

1

Decreased concentration

Yes

178

56 (31.5)

2.9 (1.2, 3.1)

No

222

42 (18.9)

1

Decreased libido

Yes

82

34 (41.5)

2.8 (1.7, 4.7)

<0.01

1.9 (1.1, 3.5)

0.033

No

318

64 (20.1)

1

Mallampati score

4-Mar

49

32 (65.3)

8.1 (4.5, 15.5)

<0.001

4.8 (2.2, 10.2)

<0.001

2-Jan

351

66 (18.8)

1

1

Macroglossia

Yes

135

59 (43.7)

4.5 (2.8, 7.3)

<0.01

2.2 (1.2, 4.0)

0.007

No

265

39 (14.7)

1

Epworth sleepiness score

24-Nov

84

27 (32.1)

1.6 (0.9, 2.7)

0.06

0 - 10

316

71 (22.5)

1

Table 4 Factors associated with the high risk of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (HR-OSAHS) before and after multi variate analysis using sequential logistic regression models, among adults in Yaoundé, November 2015-May 2016
c/aOR, crude/adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confident interval; HBP, high blood pressure

Discussion

Revealing that up to 24.5% of the adult population was at high risk of having OSAHS was major finding in this community-based study. This is an important issue given the seriousness of that condition. Another important point is that almost all factors (except parents HBP) significantly associated with a STOPBANG ≥3 in this study, are recognized OSAHS-related features. This reinforces the importance and reliance of the STOPBANG questionnaire in detecting OSAHS.

Some demographic characteristics of our population differed from those of the Center Region (of which Yaoundé is the capital), such as the proportion of 25-34 years old people (26.2% vs 41.3% in our study) or the men predominance which was not found among the Center region population.16 This could be explained by the recruitment sites, which were places of work and outdoor (physical) occupation for half of the sample, increasing the probability to enroll more young adults and more men. The proportion of overweight (25.8%) and obese (12.9%) people in our sample is consistent with the Cameroonian overall data. These were investigated by Nansseu et al.,17 in a recent systematic review that pooled 26 studies for 55,155 subjects, and found 26.0% and 15.1% of overweight and obese people respectively.17 In our study, symptoms considered as sleep related (decreased concentration, daytime tiredness, arousals, snoring, morning headache) appeared to be common among the population sample. Most of them are non-specific and can have various origins. Furthermore, the lack of details (frequency, intensity, circumstances, etc.) in the questionnaire could alter the answers’ precision. We did not find locally produced data to compare with most of our symptoms frequencies. Insomnia had been studied in Nigerian adult population by Gureje et al.,18 in a nationwide survey: the found 11.8% prevalence,18 quite lower than the one we had. The use of a more precise definition by the Nigerian team (complain lasting at least 2 weeks within the previous 12 months) could partially explain this gap.

We have found very few studies on HR-OSAHS in SSA using the STOPBANG questionnaire. Three out of the four we found came from Nigeria, which is the direct neighbor of Cameroon. Ozoh et al.,8 found a 36.3% prevalence of HR-OSAHS in Nigerian hospitalized and ambulatory adult patients.8

Their population sample made of patients vs. healthy adults in our own may easily explain their higher prevalence. A much more higher prevalence (48.8%) was found by the same author in Lagos (Nigeria), among intra-city commercial drivers,9 who are known to be on higher risk for OSAHS.19–22 The third study was a Nigerian community-based one, the authors found a 41.3% HR-OSAHS prevalence.23 A higher mean age (44±10 years) and a greater proportion of obese (27.7%) could favor a higher risk in that population compared to our sample. Kenne Kenyo24 conducted the last out of 4 studies, simultaneously with our own, in the West region of our country. Their prevalence of HR-OSAHS was 17.8%, in an adult (≥19 years) rural population.24 We assume that rural populations are more active and have reduced risk of developing lifestyle-related disorders such as OSAHS, compared to urban population. Concerning HR-OSAHS predictors, most of studies either used the Berlin questionnaire, which is another screening tool, or concerned specific populations of patients rather than general population or all comers’ patients. We found only two studies STOPBANG-based HR-OSAHS predictors. The first is the aforementioned Nigerian study on patients attending several hospitals. Hypertension, age > 65 years, cigarette smoking and cardiovascular diseases were the HR-OSAHS determinants.8 The other study came from Iran, among adults aged >18 ans. In this study, HR-OSAHS was associated with BMI, age, cardiovascular disease and diabetes.25

Our study had some methodological limitations: 1) selection of districts and buildings by convenience could lead to a selection bias, 2) recruitment limited to the active population did not necessarily reflect the community configuration, and may have contributed to bring out a male predominance. One of the strengths of our study is its pioneering nature concerning OSAHS in the Central Africa sub-region. At the end of this work, many questions on OSAHS remain unresolved as: 1) the diagnostic performance of STOPBANG for screening for OSAHS in SSA, 2) the prevalence of HR-OSAHS in specific patient populations (cardiovascular, metabolic, neurological), and 3) the real prevalence of OSAHS in Central Africa.

Conclusion

The prevalence of HR-OSAHS based on STOPBANG was high in this community sample of an urban population in Cameroon. This result is consistent with the change in lifestyle and the epidemiologic transition in SSA. The HR-OSAHS associated factors were symptoms and features generally related to OSAHS, which can reinforce the validity of the STOPBANG questionnaire in OSAHS screening. More complete studies, notably with sleep exploration, are needed to confirm these data, and improve the population, caregivers and decision-makers awareness on OSAHS.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

There was no conflict of interest for any of the authors in this study.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Peppard PE, Young T, Palta M, et al. Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(19):1378–1384.
  2. Marin JM, Agusti A, Villar I, et al. Association between treated and untreated obstructive sleep apnea and risk of hypertension. JAMA. 2012;307(20):2169–2176.
  3. Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, et al. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1046–1053.
  4. Young T, Peppard P. Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease: epidemiologic evidence for a relationship. Sleep. 2000;23(Suppl 4):S122–S126.
  5. Young T, Finn L, Peppard PE, et al. Sleep disordered breathing and mortality: eighteen-year follow-up of the Wisconsin sleep cohort. Sleep. 2008;31(8):1071–1078.
  6. Fezeu LK, Assah FK, Balkau B, et al. Ten-year changes in central obesity and BMI in rural and urban Cameroon. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(5):1144–1147.
  7. Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kengne AP. Chronic non-communicable diseases in Cameroon-burden, determinants and current policies. Global Health. 2011;7:44.
  8. Ozoh OB, Okubadejo NU, Akinkugbe AO, et al. Prospective assessment of the risk of obstructive sleep apnea in patients attending a tertiary health facility in Sub-Saharan Africa. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:302.
  9. Ozoh OB, Okubadejo NU, Akanbi MO, et al. High-risk of obstructive sleep apnea and excessive daytime sleepiness among commercial intra-city drivers in Lagos metropolis. Niger Med J. 2013;54(4):224–229.
  10. Sogebi OA, Ogunwale A. Risk factors of obstructive sleep apnea among Nigerian outpatients. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;78(6):27–33.
  11. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, et al. STOP questionnaire: a tool to screen patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(5):812–821.
  12. Chung F, Abdullah HR, Liao P. STOP-Bang Questionnaire: A Practical Approach to Screen for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Chest. 2016;149(3):631–638.
  13. Ricci J, Gagnon L. Test de sédentarité et d'activité physique. test-ricci-gagnon_actif-inactif.pdf. 2020.
  14. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540–545.
  15. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32(4):429–434.
  16. BUCREP (Central Bureau of Census and Study of the Population of Cameroon). Demographic projections). 2018.
  17. Nansseu JR, Noubiap JJ, Bigna JJ. Epidemiology of Overweight and Obesity in Adults Living in Cameroon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019;27(10):1682–1692.
  18. Gureje O, Makanjuola VA, Kola L. Insomnia and role impairment in the community : results from the Nigerian survey of mental health and wellbeing. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(6):495–501.
  19. Firestone RT, Mihaere K, Gander PH. Obstructive sleep apnoea among professional taxi drivers: a pilot study. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41(3):552–556.
  20. Garbarino S, Guglielmi O, Campus C, et al. Screening, diagnosis, and management of obstructive sleep apnea in dangerous-goods truck drivers: to be aware or not? Sleep Med. 2016;25:98–104.
  21. Guglielmi O, Magnavita N, Garbarino S. Sleep quality, obstructive sleep apnea, and psychological distress in truck drivers: a cross-sectional study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018;53(5):531–536.
  22. Sunwoo JS, Shin DS, Hwangbo Y, et al. High risk of obstructive sleep apnea, insomnia, and daytime sleepiness among commercial motor vehicle drivers. Sleep Breath. 2019;23(3):979–985.
  23. Akanbi MO, Agaba PA, Ozoh OB, et al. Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea risk among Nigerians. J Med Trop. 2017;19(2):110–115.
  24. Kenne Kenyo C. Prevalence and determinants of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in Bandjoun. Yaoundé: Higher Institute of Medical Technology. 2016.
  25. Foroughi M, Malekmohammad M, Sharafkhaneh A, et al. Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in a High-Risk Population Using the Stop-Bang Questionnaire in Tehran, Iran. Tanaffos. 2017;16(3):217–224.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2020 Massongo, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.