Research Article Volume 2 Issue 3
Hanoi National University of Education, Vietnam
Correspondence: Bui Duc Tinh, Hanoi National University of Education, 136 Xuan Thuy Street, Cau Giay District, Hanoi, Vietnam, Tel 8498 6409 706
Received: November 02, 2017 | Published: June 15, 2018
Citation: Hoc NQ, Tinh BD, Vinh DQ. Study on the melting of substitution alloy AB with interstitial atom C and FCC structure under pressure. Phys Astron Int J. 2018;2(3):231-235. DOI: 10.15406/paij.2018.02.00091
From the model of interstitial alloy AB with FCC structure and the condition of absolute stability for crystalline state we derive analytic expression for the temperature of absolute stability for crystalline state, the melting temperature and the equation of melting curve of this alloy by the way of applying the statistical moment method. The obtained results allow us to determine the melting temperature of alloy AB ant zero pressure and under pressure. In limit cases, we obtain the melting theory of main metal A with FCC structure. The theoretical results are numerically applied for alloys AuSi and AgSi.
Keywords: interstitial alloy, absolute stability of crystalline state, statistical moment method
Alloys in general and interstitial alloys in particular are typical materials in material technology and science. Study on interstitial alloys pays particular attention to many researchers. The melting temperature (MT) of materials under pressure is a very important problem of solid state physics and material science.1–3 Theoretically in order to determine the MT of crystal it is necessary to apply the equilibrium condition of solid phase and liquid phase. By this way, there are some methods such as the self–consistent phonon field method and the one–particle distribution function method. The obtained results from these methods are in not good agreement with experiments and are limited at low pressures.
In aid of the statistical moment method (SMM), Tang & Hung4,5 show that we absolutely only use the solid phase of crystal to determine the MT. The obtained results from the SMM are better than that from other methods in comparison with experiments.
Analytic result
In the model of AB interstitial alloy with the face–centured cubic (FCC) structure, the A atoms with large size stay in the peaks and the face centers of cubic unit cell and the C interstitial atoms with smaller size stay in the body center. In6,7 we derived the analytic expressions of the nearest neighbor distance, the cohesive energy and the alloy parameters for atoms B, A, A1 (the atom A in the face centers) and A2 (the atom A in the peaks).
The equation of state of the AB interstitial aloy with FCC structure at temperature T and pressure P is described by
Pv=−r1(16∂u0∂r1+θxcthx12k∂k∂r1)Pv=−r1(16∂u0∂r1+θxcthx12k∂k∂r1) (1)
At 0K and pressure P, this equation has the form
Pv=−r1(∂u0∂r1+ℏω04k∂k∂r1).Pv=−r1(∂u0∂r1+ℏω04k∂k∂r1). (2)
Knowing the form of the interaction potentialφi0φi0 ,equation (1) allows os to determine the nearest neighbor distancer1X(P,0)(X=B,A,A1,A2)r1X(P,0)(X=B,A,A1,A2) at 0K and pressure P. Knowingr1X(P,0)r1X(P,0) we can determine the parameterskX(P,0),γ1X(P,0),γ2X(P,0),γX(P,0)kX(P,0),γ1X(P,0),γ2X(P,0),γX(P,0) at 0K and pressure P for each case of X. The displacementy0X(P,T)y0X(P,T) of atoms from the equilibrium position at temperature T and pressure P is determined.6,7 From that, we can calculate the neares neighbor distancer1X(P,T)r1X(P,T) at temperature T and pressure P as follows
r1C(P,T)=r1C(P,0)+yA1(P,T),r1A(P,T)=r1A(P,0)+yA(P,T),r1C(P,T)=r1C(P,0)+yA1(P,T),r1A(P,T)=r1A(P,0)+yA(P,T),
r1A1(P,T)≈r1C(P,T),r1A2(P,T)=r1A2(P,0)+yC(P,T).r1A1(P,T)≈r1C(P,T),r1A2(P,T)=r1A2(P,0)+yC(P,T). (3)
The mean neares neighbor distance between two atoms in AB interstitial alloy with FCC structure is approximately determined by
¯r1A(P,T)=¯r1A(P,0)+¯y(P,T),¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯r1A(P,T)=¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯r1A(P,0)+¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯y(P,T),
¯r1A(P,0)=(1−cB)r1A(P,0)+cBr′1A(P,0),r′1A(P,0)=√2r1B(P,0),¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯r1A(P,0)=(1−cB)r1A(P,0)+cBr′1A(P,0),r′1A(P,0)=√2r1B(P,0),
¯y(P,T)=(1−15cB)yA(P,T)+cByB(P,T)+6cByA1(P,T)+8cByA2(P,T).¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯y(P,T)=(1−15cB)yA(P,T)+cByB(P,T)+6cByA1(P,T)+8cByA2(P,T). (4)
The free energy of AB interstitial alloy with FCC structure and concetration conditioncB<<cAcB<<cA has the form
ψAB=(1−15cB)ψA+cBψB+6cBψA1+8cBψA2−TSc.ψAB=(1−15cB)ψA+cBψB+6cBψA1+8cBψA2−TSc.
ψX≈U0X+ψ0X+3N{θ2k2X[γ2XX2X−2γ1X3(1+XX2)]+ψX≈U0X+ψ0X+3N{θ2k2X[γ2XX2X−2γ1X3(1+XX2)]+
+2θ3k4X[43γ22XXX(1+XX2)−2(γ21X+2γ1Xγ2X)(1+XX2)(1+XX)]},+2θ3k4X[43γ22XXX(1+XX2)−2(γ21X+2γ1Xγ2X)(1+XX2)(1+XX)]},
ψ0X=3Nθ[xX+ln(1−e−2xX)],XX≡xXcothxX,ψ0X=3Nθ[xX+ln(1−e−2xX)],XX≡xXcothxX, (5)
whereψAψA is the free energy of A atom in A pure metal,ψBψB is the free energy of B atom in interstitial alloy,ψA1ψA1 andψA2ψA2 respectively are free energy of A1 and A2 atoms and Sc is the configuration entropy of AC interstitial alloy.
The pressure is calculated by
P=−(∂ψ∂V)T=−a3V(∂ψ∂a)T.P=−(∂ψ∂V)T=−a3V(∂ψ∂a)T. (6)
Setting
γTG=−aAB6[1kA∂kA∂aA(1−15cB)xAcothxA+1kB∂kB∂aBcBxBcothxB+γTG=−aAB6[1kA∂kA∂aA(1−15cB)xAcothxA+1kB∂kB∂aBcBxBcothxB+
+1kA1∂kA1∂aA16cBxA1cothxA1+1kA2∂kA2∂aA28cBxA2cothxA2].+1kA1∂kA1∂aA16cBxA1cothxA1+1kA2∂kA2∂aA28cBxA2cothxA2].
(7)
Here,γTGγTG
is the Grüneisen parameter of ABalloy. Then,
P=−aAB6VAB[(1−15cB)∂U0A∂aA+cB∂U0B∂aB+6cB∂U0A1∂aA1+8cB∂U0A2∂aA2]+3γTG.θVAB.P=−aAB6VAB[(1−15cB)∂U0A∂aA+cB∂U0B∂aB+6cB∂U0A1∂aA1+8cB∂U0A2∂aA2]+3γTG.θVAB.
(8)
From the condition of absolute stability limit
(∂P∂VAB)T=0(∂P∂VAB)T=0 hay (∂P∂aAB)T=0(∂P∂aAB)T=0 (9)
we can derive the absolute stability temperature for crystalline state in the form
Ts=TS1MS1,TS1=2PVAB+a2AB6[(1−15cB)∂2U0A∂a2A+cB∂2U0B∂a2B+6cB∂2U0A1∂a2A1+8cB∂2U0A2∂a2A2]−−(1−15cB)[aAB2kA(∂kA∂aA)2−aAB∂2kA∂a2A]ℏωAaAB4kA−cB[aAB2kB(∂kB∂aB)2−aAB∂2kB∂a2B]ℏωBaAB4kB−
−6cB[aAB2kA1(∂kA1∂aA1)2−aAB∂2kA1∂a2A1]ℏωA1aAB4kA1−8cB[aAB2kA2(∂kA2∂aA2)2−aAB∂2kA2∂a2A2]ℏωA2aAB4kA2,
MS1=(1−15cB)a2ABkBo4k2A(∂kA∂aA)2+cBa2ABkBo4k2B(∂kB∂aB)2+6cBa2ABkBo4k2A1(∂kA1∂aA1)2+8cBa2ABkBo4k2A2(∂kA2∂aA2)2, (10)
In the case of zero pressure,
Ts=TS2MS2,TS2=a2AB6[(1−15cB)∂2U0A∂a2A+cB∂2U0B∂a2B+6cB∂2U0A1∂a2A1+8cB∂2U0A2∂a2A2]−
−(1−15cB)[aAB2kA(∂kA∂aA)2−aAB∂2kA∂a2A]ℏωAaAB4kA−cB[aAB2kB(∂kB∂aB)2−aAB∂2kB∂a2B]ℏωBaAB4kB− −6cB[aAB2kA1(∂kA1∂aA1)2−aAB∂2kA1∂a2A1]ℏωA1aAB4kA1−9cB[aAB2kA2(∂kA2∂aA2)2−aAB∂2kA2∂a2A2]ℏωA2aAB4kA2,
MS2=(1−15cB)a2ABkBo4k2A(∂kA∂aA)2+cBa2ABkBo4k2B(∂kB∂aB)2+6cBa2ABkBo4k2A1(∂kA1∂aA1)2+8cBa2ABkBo4k2A2(∂kA2∂aA2)2,
(11)
Because the curve of absolute stability limit for crystalline state is not far from the MS of crystal, the Ts temperature usually is large andxXcothxX≈1 atTs . Therefore,
1(1−15cB)a2ABkBo4k2A(∂kA∂aA)2+cBa2ABkBo4k2B(∂kB∂aB)2+6cBa2ABkBo4k2A1(∂kA1∂aA1)2+8cBa2ABkBo4k2A2(∂kA2∂aA2)2×
×{2PVAB+a2AB6[(1−15cB)∂2U0A∂a2A+cB∂2U0B∂a2B+6cB∂2U0A1∂a2A1+8cB∂2U0A2∂a2A2]−−(1−15cB)[aAB2kA(∂kA∂aA)2−aAB∂2kA∂a2A]ℏωAaAB4kA−cB[aAB2kB(∂kB∂aB)2−aAB∂2kB∂a2B]ℏωBaAB4kB−
−6cB[aAB2kA1(∂kA1∂aA1)2−aAB∂2kA1∂a2A1]ℏωA1aAB4kA1−8cB[aAB2kA2(∂kA2∂aA2)2−aAB∂2kA2∂a2A2]ℏωA2aAB4kA2}+
+2VABkBoaAB[1kA∂kA∂aA(1−15cB)+1kB∂kB∂aBcB+1kA1∂kA1∂aA16cB+1kA2∂kA2∂aA28cB]×
×{P+aAB6VAB[(1−15cB)∂U0A∂aA+cB∂U0B∂aB+6cB∂U0A1∂aA1+8cB∂U0A2∂aA2]}=0. (12)
That is the equation for the curve of absolute stability limit for crystalline state. Therefore, the pressure is a function of the mean nearest neighbor distance
P=P(aAB).
(13)
Temperature Ts (0) at zero pressure has the form
Ts(0)=aAB18γTGkBo[(1−15cB)∂U0A∂aA+cB∂U0B∂aB+6cB∂U0A1∂aA1+8cB∂U0A2∂aA2] (14)
where the parametersaAB, ∂U0X∂aX, γTG are determined at Ts(0) . Temperature Ts at pressure P has the form
Ts≈Ts(0)+VABP3kBo(γTG)2(∂γG∂T)aABTs. (15)
Here,kBo is the Boltzmann constant,VABC, γTG, ∂γTG/∂T dare determined atTs . Approximately,Tm≈Ts . In order to solve equation (15), we can use the approximate iteration method. In the first approximate iteration,
Ts1≈Ts(0)+VAB(Ts(0))P3kBoγG(Ts(0)). (16)
HereTs(0) is the temperature of absolute stability limit for crystalline state at pressure P in the first approximate iteration of equation (15). Substituting Ts1 into equation (15), we obtain the better approximate value Ts2 of Ts at pressure P in the second approximate iteration
Ts2≈Ts(0)+VAB(Ts1)P3kBoγG(Ts1)−VAB(Ts1)P3kBoγ2G(Ts1)(∂γG∂T)aABTs1. (17)
Analogouslty, we can obtain the better approximate values Ts3, Ts4,... of Ts at pressure P in the thierd, fourth, etc. approximate iterations. These approximations are applyed at low pressures.
In the case of high pressure, the MT of alloy at pressure P is calculated by
Tm(P)=Tm(0)B01B′0G(0).G(P)(B0+B′0P)1B′0, (18)
whereTm(P) andTm(0) respectively are the MT at pressure P and zero pressure,G(P) andG(0) respectively are the rigidity bulk modulus at pressure P and zero pressure,B0 is the isothermal elastic modulus at zero pressure, B′0=(dBTdP)P=0, BT=BT(P) is the isothermal elastic modulus at pressure.
Numerical results for alloys AuSi and AgSi
For alloys AuSi and AgSi, we use the n–m pair potential
φ(r)=Dn−m[m(r0r)n−n(r0r)m], (19)
where potential parameters are given in Table 1.8
Material |
m |
n |
D[10−16erg] width="130" |
r0[10−10m] |
Au |
5.5 |
10.5 |
6462.540 |
2.8751 |
Si |
6.0 |
12.0 |
45128.340 |
2.2950 |
Table 1 Potential parameters m,n,D,r0 of materials
Considering the interaction between atoms Au(Ag) and Si in the above mentioned alloys, we use the potential (19) but calculating approximatelyˉD=√DAu(Ag)DSi,ˉr0=√r0Au(Ag)r0Si . Parametersˉm andˉn are taken empirically.
At 0.1 MPa, Au has a FCC structure witha=4,0785.10−10m at 300K and the melting point at 1337 K. The melting curve of Au is determined up to 1673 K and 6.5 GPa with the slope dT/dP = 60 K/GPa9,10 and up to 1923 K and 12 Gpa.11
At 0.1 MPa, Ag has a FCC structure witha=4,0862.10−10m at 300K and the melting point at 1235 K. The melting curve of Au is determined up to 1563 K and 6.5 GPa with the slope dT/dP = 60 K/Gpa.9
Our numerical results are summarized in tables from Table 2 to Table 3 and illustrated in figures from Figure 1 to Figure 2. The concentration of interstitial atoms changes from 0 to 5% and the pressure changes from 0 to 10 GPa for Au and from 0 to 6 GPa for Ag.
Figure 1 Dependence of melting temperature on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms for alloy AuSi.
Figure 2 Dependence of melting temperature on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms for alloy AgSi.
x(%) |
P(GPa) |
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
0 |
SMM |
1337.33 |
1397.27 |
1454.33 |
1514.75 |
1568.48 |
1629.22 |
|
EXPT [31] |
1337.33 |
1432.90 |
1530.15 |
1628,63 |
1727.10 |
1824.36 |
|
EXPT [44] |
1340.30 |
1426.80 |
1515.77 |
1599,80 |
1683.84 |
1770.34 |
1 |
SMM |
1382.99 |
1443.15 |
1500.10 |
1560,32 |
1613.50 |
1673.78 |
3 |
SMM |
1505.78 |
1567.89 |
1625.75 |
1686,56 |
1739.30 |
1799.29 |
5 |
SMM |
1701.80 |
1771.20 |
1834.58 |
1900,23 |
1955.89 |
2018.94 |
Table 2 Dependence of melting temperature on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms for alloy Au–xSi
x(%) |
P(GPa) |
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
SMM |
1234.93 |
1322.75 |
1408.68 |
1492.95 |
|
EXPT[31] |
1234.93 |
1334.42 |
1438.19 |
1538.81 |
1 |
SMM |
1257.82 |
1349.70 |
1438.34 |
1524.38 |
3 |
SMM |
1319.47 |
1423.32 |
1520.45 |
1612.43 |
5 |
SMM |
1418.12 |
1544.47 |
1659.14 |
1764.81 |
Table 3 Dependence of melting temperature on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms for alloy Ag–xSi
According to our numerical results for alloy AuSi at the same concentration of interstitial atoms Si when pressure increases, the melting temperature increases. For example atcSi=5% when P increases from 0 to 10 GPa,Tmelting of alloy AuSi increases from 1701.8 K to 2018.94 K. At the same pressure when the concentration of interstitial atoms Si increases, the melting temperature increases. For example at P=10 GPa, whencSi increases from 0 to 5%, Tmelting of alloy AuSi increases from 11629.22 K to 2018.94K.
According to our numerical results for alloy AgSi at the same concentration of interstitial atoms Si when pressure increases, the melting temperature increases. For example atcSi=5% when P increases from 0 to 6 GPa,Tmelting of alloy AgSi increases from 1418.12 K to 1764.81 K. At the same pressure when the concentration of interstitial atoms Si increases, the melting temperature increases. For example at P=6 GPa, whencSi increases from 0 to 5%,Tmelting of alloy AuSi increases from 1492.95 K to 1764.81K (Table 3).
At zero concentration of interstitial atoms Si, the melting temperature of alloys AuSii and AgSi respectively becomes the melting temperature of metals Au and Ag. The melting temperature of substitution alloys AuCu and AgCu is smaller than the melting temperature of metals Au and Ag, respectively. The dependences of melting temperature on pressure and concentration ò interstirtial atoms Si for alloy AuSi and AgSi are shown in (Figure 1) (Figure 2).
The calculated results for the melting temperature of metals Au and Ag are in goog agreement with the experimental data12 (deviation is about sereral percents) (Table 4) (Table 5).
Metal |
Au |
Ag |
Tm(K)
|
1400 |
1190 |
Table 4 The melting temperatures of metals Au and Ag at zero pressure
P(GPa) |
Method |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Au |
SMM |
1476 |
1543 |
1602 |
1651 |
1693 |
1728 |
Ag |
SMM |
1282 |
1367 |
1443 |
1513 |
1575 |
1631 |
Table 5 The melting temperatures of metals Au and Ag under pressure
In aid of the SMM, we derive the analytic expressions of the temperature of absolute stability limit for crystalline state and the melting temperature together with the melting curve of the binary interstitial alloy depending on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms. In limit case, we obtain the melting theory of main metal with FCC structure. The theoretical results are numerically applied for alloys AuSi and AgSi.
None.
Author declares there is no conflict of interest.
©2018 Hoc, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.