Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2576-4543

Physics & Astronomy International Journal

Research Article Volume 2 Issue 3

Study on the melting of interstitial alloy AB with FCC structure under pressure

Nguyen Quang Hoc, Bui Duc Tinh, Dinh Quang Vinh

Hanoi National University of Education, Vietnam

Correspondence: Bui Duc Tinh, Hanoi National University of Education, 136 Xuan Thuy Street, Cau Giay District, Hanoi, Vietnam, Tel 8498 6409 706

Received: November 02, 2017 | Published: June 15, 2018

Citation: Hoc NQ, Tinh BD, Vinh DQ. Study on the melting of substitution alloy AB with interstitial atom C and FCC structure under pressure. Phys Astron Int J. 2018;2(3):231-235. DOI: 10.15406/paij.2018.02.00091

Download PDF

Abstract

From the model of interstitial alloy AB with FCC structure and the condition of absolute stability for crystalline state we derive analytic expression for the temperature of absolute stability for crystalline state, the melting temperature and the equation of melting curve of this alloy by the way of applying the statistical moment method. The obtained results allow us to determine the melting temperature of alloy AB ant zero pressure and under pressure. In limit cases, we obtain the melting theory of main metal A with FCC structure. The theoretical results are numerically applied for alloys AuSi and AgSi.

Keywords: interstitial alloy, absolute stability of crystalline state, statistical moment method

Introduction

Alloys in general and interstitial alloys in particular are typical materials in material technology and science. Study on interstitial alloys pays particular attention to many researchers. The melting temperature (MT) of materials under pressure is a very important problem of solid state physics and material science.1–3 Theoretically in order to determine the MT of crystal it is necessary to apply the equilibrium condition of solid phase and liquid phase. By this way, there are some methods such as the self–consistent phonon field method and the one–particle distribution function method. The obtained results from these methods are in not good agreement with experiments and are limited at low pressures.

In aid of the statistical moment method (SMM), Tang & Hung4,5 show that we absolutely only use the solid phase of crystal to determine the MT. The obtained results from the SMM are better than that from other methods in comparison with experiments.

Content of research

Analytic result

In the model of AB interstitial alloy with the face–centured cubic (FCC) structure, the A atoms with large size stay in the peaks and the face centers of cubic unit cell and the C interstitial atoms with smaller size stay in the body center. In6,7 we derived the analytic expressions of the nearest neighbor distance, the cohesive energy and the alloy parameters for atoms B, A, A1 (the atom A in the face centers) and A2 (the atom A in the peaks).

The equation of state of the AB interstitial aloy with FCC structure at temperature T and pressure P is described by

Pv=r1(16u0r1+θxcthx12kkr1)Pv=r1(16u0r1+θxcthx12kkr1)  (1)

At 0K and pressure P, this equation has the form

Pv=r1(u0r1+ω04kkr1).Pv=r1(u0r1+ω04kkr1).  (2)

Knowing the form of the interaction potentialφi0φi0 ,equation (1) allows os to determine the nearest neighbor distancer1X(P,0)(X=B,A,A1,A2)r1X(P,0)(X=B,A,A1,A2) at 0K and pressure P. Knowingr1X(P,0)r1X(P,0) we can determine the parameterskX(P,0),γ1X(P,0),γ2X(P,0),γX(P,0)kX(P,0),γ1X(P,0),γ2X(P,0),γX(P,0) at 0K and pressure P for each case of X. The displacementy0X(P,T)y0X(P,T) of atoms from the equilibrium position at temperature T and pressure P is determined.6,7 From that, we can calculate the neares neighbor distancer1X(P,T)r1X(P,T) at temperature T and pressure P as follows

r1C(P,T)=r1C(P,0)+yA1(P,T),r1A(P,T)=r1A(P,0)+yA(P,T),r1C(P,T)=r1C(P,0)+yA1(P,T),r1A(P,T)=r1A(P,0)+yA(P,T),

r1A1(P,T)r1C(P,T),r1A2(P,T)=r1A2(P,0)+yC(P,T).r1A1(P,T)r1C(P,T),r1A2(P,T)=r1A2(P,0)+yC(P,T).  (3)

The mean neares neighbor distance between two atoms in AB interstitial alloy with FCC structure is approximately determined by

¯r1A(P,T)=¯r1A(P,0)+¯y(P,T),¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯r1A(P,T)=¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯r1A(P,0)+¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯y(P,T),

¯r1A(P,0)=(1cB)r1A(P,0)+cBr1A(P,0),r1A(P,0)=2r1B(P,0),¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯r1A(P,0)=(1cB)r1A(P,0)+cBr1A(P,0),r1A(P,0)=2r1B(P,0),

¯y(P,T)=(115cB)yA(P,T)+cByB(P,T)+6cByA1(P,T)+8cByA2(P,T).¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯y(P,T)=(115cB)yA(P,T)+cByB(P,T)+6cByA1(P,T)+8cByA2(P,T).  (4)

The free energy of AB interstitial alloy with FCC structure and concetration conditioncB<<cAcB<<cA has the form

ψAB=(115cB)ψA+cBψB+6cBψA1+8cBψA2TSc.ψAB=(115cB)ψA+cBψB+6cBψA1+8cBψA2TSc.

ψXU0X+ψ0X+3N{θ2k2X[γ2XX2X2γ1X3(1+XX2)]+ψXU0X+ψ0X+3N{θ2k2X[γ2XX2X2γ1X3(1+XX2)]+

+2θ3k4X[43γ22XXX(1+XX2)2(γ21X+2γ1Xγ2X)(1+XX2)(1+XX)]},+2θ3k4X[43γ22XXX(1+XX2)2(γ21X+2γ1Xγ2X)(1+XX2)(1+XX)]},

ψ0X=3Nθ[xX+ln(1e2xX)],XXxXcothxX,ψ0X=3Nθ[xX+ln(1e2xX)],XXxXcothxX,  (5)

whereψAψA is the free energy of A atom in A pure metal,ψBψB is the free energy of B atom in interstitial alloy,ψA1ψA1  andψA2ψA2 respectively are free energy of A1 and A2 atoms and Sc is the configuration entropy of AC interstitial alloy.

The pressure is calculated by

P=(ψV)T=a3V(ψa)T.P=(ψV)T=a3V(ψa)T.  (6)

Setting

γTG=aAB6[1kAkAaA(115cB)xAcothxA+1kBkBaBcBxBcothxB+γTG=aAB6[1kAkAaA(115cB)xAcothxA+1kBkBaBcBxBcothxB+
+1kA1kA1aA16cBxA1cothxA1+1kA2kA2aA28cBxA2cothxA2].+1kA1kA1aA16cBxA1cothxA1+1kA2kA2aA28cBxA2cothxA2].  (7)

Here,γTGγTG is the Grüneisen parameter of ABalloy. Then,

P=aAB6VAB[(115cB)U0AaA+cBU0BaB+6cBU0A1aA1+8cBU0A2aA2]+3γTG.θVAB.P=aAB6VAB[(115cB)U0AaA+cBU0BaB+6cBU0A1aA1+8cBU0A2aA2]+3γTG.θVAB. (8)

From the condition of absolute stability limit

(PVAB)T=0(PVAB)T=0  hay (PaAB)T=0(PaAB)T=0 (9)

we can derive the absolute stability temperature for crystalline state in the form

Ts=TS1MS1,TS1=2PVAB+a2AB6[(115cB)2U0Aa2A+cB2U0Ba2B+6cB2U0A1a2A1+8cB2U0A2a2A2](115cB)[aAB2kA(kAaA)2aAB2kAa2A]ωAaAB4kAcB[aAB2kB(kBaB)2aAB2kBa2B]ωBaAB4kB

6cB[aAB2kA1(kA1aA1)2aAB2kA1a2A1]ωA1aAB4kA18cB[aAB2kA2(kA2aA2)2aAB2kA2a2A2]ωA2aAB4kA2,

MS1=(115cB)a2ABkBo4k2A(kAaA)2+cBa2ABkBo4k2B(kBaB)2+6cBa2ABkBo4k2A1(kA1aA1)2+8cBa2ABkBo4k2A2(kA2aA2)2, (10)

In the case of zero pressure,

Ts=TS2MS2,TS2=a2AB6[(115cB)2U0Aa2A+cB2U0Ba2B+6cB2U0A1a2A1+8cB2U0A2a2A2]

(115cB)[aAB2kA(kAaA)2aAB2kAa2A]ωAaAB4kAcB[aAB2kB(kBaB)2aAB2kBa2B]ωBaAB4kB        6cB[aAB2kA1(kA1aA1)2aAB2kA1a2A1]ωA1aAB4kA19cB[aAB2kA2(kA2aA2)2aAB2kA2a2A2]ωA2aAB4kA2,

MS2=(115cB)a2ABkBo4k2A(kAaA)2+cBa2ABkBo4k2B(kBaB)2+6cBa2ABkBo4k2A1(kA1aA1)2+8cBa2ABkBo4k2A2(kA2aA2)2, (11)

Because the curve of absolute stability limit for crystalline state is not far from the MS of crystal, the Ts temperature usually is large andxXcothxX1 atTs . Therefore,

1(115cB)a2ABkBo4k2A(kAaA)2+cBa2ABkBo4k2B(kBaB)2+6cBa2ABkBo4k2A1(kA1aA1)2+8cBa2ABkBo4k2A2(kA2aA2)2×

×{2PVAB+a2AB6[(115cB)2U0Aa2A+cB2U0Ba2B+6cB2U0A1a2A1+8cB2U0A2a2A2](115cB)[aAB2kA(kAaA)2aAB2kAa2A]ωAaAB4kAcB[aAB2kB(kBaB)2aAB2kBa2B]ωBaAB4kB

6cB[aAB2kA1(kA1aA1)2aAB2kA1a2A1]ωA1aAB4kA18cB[aAB2kA2(kA2aA2)2aAB2kA2a2A2]ωA2aAB4kA2}+

+2VABkBoaAB[1kAkAaA(115cB)+1kBkBaBcB+1kA1kA1aA16cB+1kA2kA2aA28cB]×

×{P+aAB6VAB[(115cB)U0AaA+cBU0BaB+6cBU0A1aA1+8cBU0A2aA2]}=0.  (12)

That is the equation for the curve of absolute stability limit for crystalline state. Therefore, the pressure is a function of the mean nearest neighbor distance

P=P(aAB). (13)

Temperature Ts (0) at zero pressure has the form

Ts(0)=aAB18γTGkBo[(115cB)U0AaA+cBU0BaB+6cBU0A1aA1+8cBU0A2aA2]  (14)

where the parametersaAB,U0XaX,γTG are determined at Ts(0) . Temperature Ts at pressure P has the form

TsTs(0)+VABP3kBo(γTG)2(γGT)aABTs.  (15)

Here,kBo is the Boltzmann constant,VABC, γTG, γTG/T dare determined atTs . Approximately,TmTs . In order to solve equation (15), we can use the approximate iteration method. In the first approximate iteration,

Ts1Ts(0)+VAB(Ts(0))P3kBoγG(Ts(0)).  (16)

HereTs(0) is the temperature of absolute stability limit for crystalline state at pressure P in the first approximate iteration of equation (15). Substituting Ts1 into equation (15), we obtain the better approximate value Ts2 of Ts at pressure P in the second approximate iteration

Ts2Ts(0)+VAB(Ts1)P3kBoγG(Ts1)VAB(Ts1)P3kBoγ2G(Ts1)(γGT)aABTs1. (17)

Analogouslty, we can obtain the better approximate values Ts3,Ts4,...  of Ts at pressure P in the thierd, fourth, etc. approximate iterations. These approximations are applyed at low pressures.

In the case of high pressure, the MT of alloy at pressure P is calculated by

Tm(P)=Tm(0)B01B0G(0).G(P)(B0+B0P)1B0,  (18)

whereTm(P) andTm(0) respectively are the MT at pressure P and zero pressure,G(P) andG(0) respectively are the rigidity bulk modulus at pressure P and zero pressure,B0 is the isothermal elastic modulus at zero pressure, B0=(dBTdP)P=0, BT=BT(P) is the isothermal elastic modulus at pressure.

Numerical results for alloys AuSi and AgSi
For alloys AuSi and AgSi, we use the n–m pair potential

φ(r)=Dnm[m(r0r)nn(r0r)m],  (19)

where potential parameters are given in Table 1.8

Material

m

n

D[1016erg]

width="130"

r0[1010m]

Au
Ag

5.5
5.5

10.5
11.5

6462.540
4589.328

2.8751
2.8760

Si

6.0

12.0

45128.340

2.2950

Table 1 Potential parameters m,n,D,r0 of materials

Considering the interaction between atoms Au(Ag) and Si in the above mentioned alloys, we use the potential (19) but calculating approximatelyˉD=DAu(Ag)DSi,ˉr0=r0Au(Ag)r0Si . Parametersˉm andˉn are taken empirically.

At 0.1 MPa, Au has a FCC structure witha=4,0785.1010m at 300K and the melting point at 1337 K. The melting curve of Au is determined up to 1673 K and 6.5 GPa with the slope dT/dP = 60 K/GPa9,10 and up to 1923 K and 12 Gpa.11

At 0.1 MPa, Ag has a FCC structure witha=4,0862.1010m at 300K and the melting point at 1235 K. The melting curve of Au is determined up to 1563 K and 6.5 GPa with the slope dT/dP = 60 K/Gpa.9

Our numerical results are summarized in tables from Table 2 to Table 3 and illustrated in figures from Figure 1 to Figure 2. The concentration of interstitial atoms changes from 0 to 5% and the pressure changes from 0 to 10 GPa for Au and from 0 to 6 GPa for Ag.

Figure 1 Dependence of melting temperature on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms for alloy AuSi.

Figure 2 Dependence of melting temperature on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms for alloy AgSi.

x(%)

P(GPa)

0

2

4

6

8

10

0

SMM

1337.33

1397.27

1454.33

1514.75

1568.48

1629.22

 

EXPT [31]

1337.33

1432.90

1530.15

1628,63

1727.10

1824.36

 

EXPT [44]

1340.30

1426.80

1515.77

1599,80

1683.84

1770.34

1

SMM

1382.99

1443.15

1500.10

1560,32

1613.50

1673.78

3

SMM

1505.78

1567.89

1625.75

1686,56

1739.30

1799.29

5

SMM

1701.80

1771.20

1834.58

1900,23

1955.89

2018.94

Table 2 Dependence of melting temperature on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms for alloy Au–xSi

x(%)

P(GPa)

0

2

4

6

0

SMM

1234.93

1322.75

1408.68

1492.95

 

EXPT[31]

1234.93

1334.42

1438.19

1538.81

1

SMM

1257.82

1349.70

1438.34

1524.38

3

SMM

1319.47

1423.32

1520.45

1612.43

5

SMM

1418.12

1544.47

1659.14

1764.81

Table 3 Dependence of melting temperature on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms for alloy Ag–xSi

According to our numerical results for alloy AuSi at the same concentration of interstitial atoms Si when pressure increases, the melting temperature increases. For example atcSi=5% when P increases from 0 to 10 GPa,Tmelting of alloy AuSi increases from 1701.8 K to 2018.94 K. At the same pressure when the concentration of interstitial atoms Si increases, the melting temperature increases. For example at P=10 GPa, whencSi increases from 0 to 5%, Tmelting of alloy AuSi increases from 11629.22 K to 2018.94K.

According to our numerical results for alloy AgSi at the same concentration of interstitial atoms Si when pressure increases, the melting temperature increases. For example atcSi=5% when P increases from 0 to 6 GPa,Tmelting of alloy AgSi increases from 1418.12 K to 1764.81 K. At the same pressure when the concentration of interstitial atoms Si increases, the melting temperature increases. For example at P=6 GPa, whencSi increases from 0 to 5%,Tmelting of alloy AuSi increases from 1492.95 K to 1764.81K (Table 3).

At zero concentration of interstitial atoms Si, the melting temperature of alloys AuSii and AgSi respectively becomes the melting temperature of metals Au and Ag. The melting temperature of substitution alloys AuCu and AgCu is smaller than the melting temperature of metals Au and Ag, respectively. The dependences of melting temperature on pressure and concentration ò interstirtial atoms Si for alloy AuSi and AgSi are shown in (Figure 1) (Figure 2).

The calculated results for the melting temperature of metals Au and Ag are in goog agreement with the experimental data12 (deviation is about sereral percents) (Table 4) (Table 5).

Metal

Au

Ag

Tm(K)
–SMM
–EXPT[12]

 

1400
1336

 

1190
1234

Table 4 The melting temperatures of metals Au and Ag at zero pressure

P(GPa)

Method

1

2

3

4

5

6

Au

SMM
EXPT[12]

1476
1383

1543
1455

1602
1513

1651
1575

1693
1625

1728
1667

Ag

SMM
EXPT[12]

1282
1300

1367
1353

1443
1403

1513
1462

1575
1509

1631
1549

Table 5 The melting temperatures of metals Au and Ag under pressure

Conclusion

In aid of the SMM, we derive the analytic expressions of the temperature of absolute stability limit for crystalline state and the melting temperature together with the melting curve of the binary interstitial alloy depending on pressure and concentration of interstitial atoms. In limit case, we obtain the melting theory of main metal with FCC structure. The theoretical results are numerically applied for alloys AuSi and AgSi.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

Author declares there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belonoshko AB, Simak SI, Kochetov AE, et al. High–pressure melting of molybdenum. Physical Review Letters. 2004;92(19).
  2. Burakovsky L, Preston DL, Silbar RR. Analysis of dislocation mechanism for melting of elements: Pressure dependence. Journal of Applied Physics. 2000;88(11):6294–6331.
  3. Kumari M, Kumari K, Dass N. Onthe melting law at high pressure. Physica Status Solidi (a). 1987;99(1):22–26.
  4. Tang N, Hung VV. Investigation of the thermodynamic properties of anharmonic crystals by the momentum method. I. General results for face–centred cubic crystals. Physica Status Solidi (B). 1998;149(2):511–519.
  5. Hung VV, Masuda–Jindo K. Application of statistical moment method to thermodynamic properties of metals at high pressures. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 2000;69.
  6. Hoc NQ, Tinh BD, Tuan LD, et al. Elastic deformation of binary and ternary interstitial alloys with FCC structure and zero pressure: Dependence on temperature, concentration of substitution atoms and concentration of interstitial atoms. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 2016;61(7):47–57.
  7. Hoc NQ, Vinh DQ, Viet LH. Thermodynamic property of binary interstitial alloy with FCC structure: Dependence on temperature and concentration of interstitial atoms. Vietnam: Report at the 41th National Conference on Theoretical Physics (NCTP–41); 2016.
  8. Magomedov MN. J Fiz Khimic. 1987;61:1003.
  9. Akella J, Kennedy GC. Melting of Au, Ag and Cu–proposal for a new high–pressure calibration scale. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1971;76(20):4969–4977.
  10. Mirwald PW, Kennedy GC. The melting curve of Au, Ag and Cu to 60–kbar pressure: A reinvestigation. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1979;84(B12):6750–6756.
  11. Sumita T, Kato M, Yoneda A. The thermal analysis in an MA–8 type apparatus: the melting of gold at 12 GPa. The Review of High Pressure Science and Technology. 1998;7:254–256.
  12. Tonkov EY, Ponyatovsky EG. Phase transformations of elements under high pressure. USA: CRC Press; 2005.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Hoc, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.