Gibb’s free energy of the spinning black holes

doi:10.15406/paij.2020.04.00199

eISSN: 2576-4543

Physics & Astronomy International Journal

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 1

Gibb’s free energy of the spinning black holes

Alok Ranjan,¹ Dipo Mahto²

Verify Captcha

Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.

¹Department of Physics, Research Scholar University, India
²Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Marwari College, India

Correspondence: Dipo Mahto, Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Marwari College, TMBU Bhagalpur, India , Tel 9006187234

Received: January 31, 2020 | Published: February 12, 2020

Citation: Ranjan A, Mahto D. Gibb’s free energy of the spinning black holes. Phys Astron Int J. 2020;4(1):23-28. DOI: 10.15406/paij.2020.04.00199

Download PDF

Abstract

The present gives a model for the change in Gibb’s free energy of spinning black holes with corresponding change in the event horizon using the first law of black hole mechanics, mass-energy equivalence relation applied to the Gibb’s free energy of the Reissnner-Nordstrom black hole and concludes that the magnitude of change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon is approximately similar to the magnitude of change in temperature of spinning black holes with corresponding change in the mass in XRBs.

Keywords: free energy, surface gravity, XRBs

Introduction

David Hochberg¹ computed the O(h) corrections to the mass, thermal energy, entropy and free energy of the black hole due to the presence of hot conformal scalars, massless spinors and U(1) gauge quantum fields in the vicinity of the black hole using the recent solutions of the semi-classical back-reaction proble.¹ You Gen Shen and Chang-Jun Gao calculated free energy and entropy of diatomic black hole due to arbitrary spin fields using the membrane model based on the brick-wall model and showed that the energy of scalar field and the entropy of Fermionic field have similar formulas containing only a numerical coefficient between them.² David Kastor et al.³ analysed the free energy and also specific heat in the small and large black hole limits and comment upon the Hawking-Page phase transition for generic Ads-Lovelock black holes.³ Hugues Beauchesne and Ariel Edery has shown that the negative of the total Lagrangian approaches the Helmholtz free energy of a Schwarzschild black hole at the time of collapse. He also computed the numerical value of the interior Lagrangian to the expected analytical value of the interior Gibb’s free energy for different initial states.⁴ In the present work, we have proposed a model for the change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon using the first law of black hole mechanics, mass-energy equivalence relation applied to the Gibb’s free energy of the Reissnner-Nordstrom black hole.

Theoretical discussion

Black holes are boost machines processing the high frequency input and deliver it as low frequency output, owing to the gravitational shift and also provide a glimpse of the world at very short distance scales. This world consists of nothing, but vacuum fluctuations.⁵ Black hole is one of new physical phenomena predicted by General relativity⁶ and defined as the solution of Einstein’s gravitational field equations in the absence of matter that describes the space-time around a gravitationally collapsed star.⁷ The gravity of a black hole is so abnormal that nothing can escape from it. The generalised form for entropy of Reissnner-Nordstrom black holes in commutative space is given by the following equation⁸

$S = \frac{A_{s}}{4} - π Q^{2} ln \frac{A_{s}}{4} + \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} c_{n} (\frac{4}{A_{s}}) + C$ $S = \frac{A_{s}}{4} - π Q^{2} \ln \frac{A_{s}}{4} + \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} c_{n} (\frac{4}{A_{s}}) + C$ (1)

Where C=constant

c_n=quantum gravity model dependent coefficients, A_s=surface area of the black holes & Q=charge on the black holes.

In the case of black holes having charge (Q=0), then the equation (1) takes its form

$S = \frac{A_{s}}{4}$ $S = \frac{A_{s}}{4}$ (2)

The equation (2) is known as standard Bekenstein entropy of black hole. For the spherically symmetric and stationary or Schwarzschild black hole, its surface area is naturally given by the following equation^9,10

$A = 4 π R_{b h}^{2}$ $A = 4 π R_{b h}^{2}$ (3)

Where the radius of event horizon for non-spinning and spinning black holes are given by equations (4) and (5) respectively.

$R_{b h} = \frac{2 G M}{c^{2}}$ $R_{b h} = \frac{2 G M}{c^{2}}$ (4)

And

$R_{b h} = \frac{G M}{c^{2}}$ $R_{b h} = \frac{G M}{c^{2}}$ (5)

The entropy of black holes (S) can be obtained by putting (3) into eqn (2) as:

$S = π R_{b h}^{2}$ $S = π R_{b h}^{2}$ (6)

The above equation is differentiated, we have

$d S = 2 π R_{b h} d R_{b h}$ $d S = 2 π R_{b h} d R_{b h}$ (7)

The Gibb’s free energy of the Reissnner-Nordstrom black hole is given by the following equation³

$G = E - T S - Φ_{H} . Q$ $G = E - T S - Φ_{H} . Q$ (8)

Where E=ADM mass of Reissner–Nordström black hole which gives the total energy of a space-time as defined by an observer at spatial infinity, using the Hamiltonian formalism, for an asymptotically flat space-time and The ADM mass consists of two contributions: black hole horizon and solitonic residue. It is always greater than the Schwarzschild black holes.

T=Temperature of black hole.

S=Entropy of black hole.

Q=Charge of the black hole.

$Φ_{H}$ $Φ_{H}$ =Electrostatic potential at the outer horizon of black hole.

Actually the astronomical black hole is not likely to have any significant charge, because it will usually neutralised by surrounding plasma.¹¹ Hence the charge Q=0, the equation (8) becomes

$G = E - T S$ $G = E - T S$ (9)

The product of temperature (T) and entropy (S) for the Reissnner-Nordstrom black hole is given by.³

$T S = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{M^{2} - Q^{2}}$ $T S = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{M^{2} - Q^{2}}$ (10)

For Q=0,

$T S = \frac{M}{2}$ $T S = \frac{M}{2}$ (11)

According to Einstein well-known mass-energy equivalence relation, we know that

$E = M c^{2}$ $E = M c^{2}$ (12)

Putting (11) and (12) into equation (9), we have

$G = M c^{2} - \frac{M}{2}$ $G = M c^{2} - \frac{M}{2}$ (13)

Putting c=1 throughout our research work, the equation becomes

$G = M - \frac{M}{2}$ $G = M - \frac{M}{2}$

$G = \frac{M}{2}$ $G = \frac{M}{2}$ (14)

The change in free energy of the Reissnner-Nordstrom black hole due to change in the mass of black hole can be obtained by differentiating the above equation

$d G = \frac{1}{2} d M$ $d G = \frac{1}{2} d M$ (15)

The first law of black hole mechanics is simply an identity relating the change in mass M, angular momentum J, horizon area A and charge Q, of a black hole. The first order variations of these quantities in the vacuum satisfy.^12,13

$δ M = \frac{k}{8 π} δ A + Ω δ J - υ δ Q$ $δ M = \frac{k}{8 π} δ A + Ω δ J - υ δ Q$ (16)

Where $Ω$ $Ω$ =Angular velocity of the horizon. $υ$ $υ$ =difference in the electrostatic potential between infinity and horizon.

For Q=0, dQ=0 and using the relation (2), the equation (16) becomes

$δ M = \frac{κ}{2 π} δ S + Ω δ J$ $δ M = \frac{κ}{2 π} δ S + Ω δ J$ (17)

Putting (7) in the above equation, we have

$δ M = κ R_{b h} δ R_{b h} + Ω δ J$ $δ M = κ R_{b h} δ R_{b h} + Ω δ J$ (18)

For maximum spin of black hole (a*=1), the angular momentum of the black hole is given by.¹²

$J = M^{2}$ $J = M^{2}$ (19)

This condition corresponds to spinning black holes

$δ J = 2 M δ M$ $δ J = 2 M δ M$ (20)

Putting the above value in eqn (18), we have

$δ M = κ R_{b h} δ R_{b h} + 2 Ω M δ M$ $δ M = κ R_{b h} δ R_{b h} + 2 Ω M δ M$ (21)

$(1 - 2 Ω M) δ M = κ R_{b h} δ R_{b h}$ $(1 - 2 Ω M) δ M = κ R_{b h} δ R_{b h}$

$δ M = \frac{κ}{(1 - 2 Ω M)} R_{b h} δ R_{b h}$ $δ M = \frac{κ}{(1 - 2 Ω M)} R_{b h} δ R_{b h}$ (22)

Putting the above value in equation (15), we have

$δ G = \frac{κ}{2 (1 - 2 Ω M)} R_{b h} δ R_{b h}$ $δ G = \frac{κ}{2 (1 - 2 Ω M)} R_{b h} δ R_{b h}$ (23)

The above equation gives the change in Gibb’s free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon in terms of surface gravity, mass, angular velocity and event horizon of spinning black holes. In the case of spinning black holes, the surface gravity of a black hole is given by the Kerr solution.^12,13

$κ = \frac{{(M^{4} - J_{H}^{2})}^{1 / 2}}{2 M {M^{2} + {(M^{4} - J_{H}^{2})}^{1 / 2}}}$ $κ = \frac{{(M^{4} - J_{H}^{2})}^{1 / 2}}{2 M {M^{2} + {(M^{4} - J_{H}^{2})}^{1 / 2}}}$ (24)

Each black hole is characterised by just three numbers: mass M, spin parameter a* defined such that the angular momentum of the black hole is a*GM²/c.^11,12

Hence we have

$J_{H} = a * G M^{2} / c$ $J_{H} = a * G M^{2} / c$ (25)

Using G=c=h=1, we have

$J_{H} = a * M^{2}$ $J_{H} = a * M^{2}$ (26)

The radius is smaller in the case of spinning black holes, tending to GM/c² as a* tends to 1¹¹ and in the case of spinning black holes having spin parameter (a*=1), then we have,

where

$J_{H} = M^{2}$ $J_{H} = M^{2}$ (27)

using the relation (27) into (24), we have

$κ = 0$ $κ = 0$ (28)

The equation (23) becomes

$d G = 0$ $d G = 0$ (29)

This equation shows that the change in free energy is zero for the spinning black holes spinning at max. Spin. The above equation can be written as:

G= constant (30)

The above equation shows that the total Gibb’s free energy of spinning black holes spinning at max. Rate has constant free energy.

Wang, D has shown that the angular velocity () evolves in a non-monotonous way in the case of thin disk-pure-accretion attaining a maximum at a*=0.994 and turns out to depend on the radial gradient of near the BH horizon.¹⁴ One black hole at the heart of galaxy NGC1365 is turning at 84% the speed light. It has reached the cosmic speed limit and cannot spin any faster without revealing its singularity.¹⁵

For convenience, let us assume a*=0.9

$J_{H} = a_{*} M^{2}$ $J_{H} = a_{*} M^{2}$ or $J_{H} = \frac{9}{10} M^{2}$ $J_{H} = \frac{9}{10} M^{2}$ or $J_{H}^{2} = \frac{81}{100} M^{4}$ $J_{H}^{2} = \frac{81}{100} M^{4}$ and hence, we have

$M^{4} - J_{H}^{2} = M^{4} - \frac{81 M^{4}}{100} = \frac{19}{100} M^{4}$

or ${(M^{4} - J_{H}^{2})}^{1 / 2} = \frac{\sqrt{19}}{10} M^{2} = 0.4358 M^{2}$ (31)

or $2 M [M^{2} + {(M^{4} - J_{H}^{2})}^{1 / 2}]$

$= 2 M [M^{2} + 0.4358 M^{2}]$

$= 2 M [1.4358 M^{2}] = = 2.8716 M^{3}$ (32)

Putting (31) and (32) in equation (24), we have

$κ = \frac{.4358 M^{2}}{2.8716 M^{3}}$

$κ = \frac{.1517}{M}$ (33)

Using above equation, eqn (23) becomes

$\frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} = \frac{.1517 R_{b h}}{2 M (1 - 2 Ω M)}$

$\frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} = \frac{.07588 R_{b h}}{M (1 - 2 Ω M)}$ (34)

The equation (34) gives the change in Gibb’s free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon in terms of mass, angular velocity and event horizon of spinning black holes.

Using G=h=c=1 with equation (5), we have

$R_{b h} = M$ (35)

Using the above relation with equation (34) and solving, we have

$\frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} = \frac{.07588}{(1 - 2 Ω M)}$ (36)

Some parameters of computed 2D models for progenitor stars with different masses and angular velocity of the Fe-core prior to collapse is given by¹⁶From the data in the Table 1, it is clear that the masses of the collapsed stars are within the limit of 20 of the solar mass. We also know that the mass of the astrophysical objects like the black holes existing in XRBs ranging from 5 M_ʘ -20M_ʘ.¹¹

S. No	Model	Mass (M_ʘ)	Angular velocity (in sec-1)	Polar angles	Reference
1	S11.2	11.2	0	[46.8, 133.2]	16
2	S11.2	11.2	0	[46.8, 133.2]	16
3	S15	S15	0	[46.8, 133.2]	16
4	S15p	15	0	[46.8, 133.2]	16
5	S15r	15	0.5	[0, 90]	16
6	S20	20	0	[46.8, 133.2]	16

Table 1 Some parameters of computed 2D models for progenitor stars with different masses and angular velocity of the Fe-core prior to collapse

S. No	Mass of (M)	Radius of event horizon	dG/dR_bh Joule
1	5M_ʘ	7375	7.626x10^-33
2	6 M_ʘ	8850	6.355x10^-33
3	7 M_ʘ	10325	5.447x10^-33
4	8 M_ʘ	11800	4.766x10^-33
5	9 M_ʘ	13275	4.236x10^-33
6	10 M_ʘ	14750	3.813x10^-33
7	11 M_ʘ	16225	3.466x10^-33
8	12 M_ʘ	17700	3.177x10^-33
9	13 M_ʘ	19175	2.933x10^-33
10	14 M_ʘ	20650	2.723x10^-33
11	15 M_ʘ	22125	2.542x10^-33
12	16 M_ʘ	23600	2.383x10^-33
13	17 M_ʘ	25075	2.242x10^-33
14	18 M_ʘ	26550	2.118x10^-33
15	19 M_ʘ	28025	2.006x10^-33
16	20 M_ʘ	29500	1.906x10^-33

Table 2 Change in free energy of spinning black holes corresponding change with event horizon in XRBs

From the data in the Table 1, it is also clear that the maximum of the collapsed stars have zero angular velocity except one having polar angle of lateral grid boundaries. Hence we can use zero angular velocity in equation (36) and solving, we have

$\frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} = 0.7588$ (37)

$d G α d R_{b h}$ (38)

Eqn (38) shows that the change in free energy of spinning black holes is directly proportional to the corresponding change in the radius of event horizon. This shows that the change in the free energy of spinning black holes w.r.t. the event horizon existing in XRBs remains the same except for those spinning black holes having polar angle [0, 90] degree of lateral grid boundaries. This change in the free energy of spinning black holes w.r.t. the event horizon existing in XRBs can be shown by the following graph as:

But for =0.5 s^-1, the equation (36) becomes

$\frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} = - \frac{0.07588}{M - 1}$ (39)

In compared to the mass of the spinning black holes, the term 1 is negligible and hence can be neglected.

$\frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} = - \frac{0.07588}{M}$ (40)

$| \frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} | = \frac{0.07588}{M}$ (41)

This shows the magnitude of change in free energy of spinning black hole of angular velocity 0.5 per second with about maximum spin is inversely proportional to the mass.

Result and discussion

In the present work, we have proposed a model for the change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon in terms of surface gravity, angular velocity, mass and radius of the event horizon of the spinning black holes given by the equation $δ G = \frac{κ}{2 (1 - 2 Ω M)} R_{b h} δ R_{b h}$ using the first law of black hole mechanics, mass-energy equivalence relation applied to the Gibb’s free energy of the Reissnner-Nordstrom black hole. From the equation, it is clear that the surface gravity has vital role for change in free energy because its values vary for different types of black holes existing either in XRBs. In the present work, we have applied the above formula for zero surface gravity to get the change in free energy of all black holes are zero. We also have applied this work to the spinning black holes of maximum spin and obtained the change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon is given by equation $\frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} = \frac{.07588 R_{b h}}{M (1 - 2 Ω M)}$ . After this, the work is specialised for zero angular velocity and angular velocity (0.5 per second) and also obtained that the change in free energy of spinning black holes is directly proportional to the corresponding change in the radius of event horizon. This shows that the change in the free energy of spinning black holes w.r.t. the event horizon existing in XRBs remains the same except for those spinning black holes having polar angle [0,90] degree of lateral grid boundaries.

For the angular velocity (=0.5 sec^-1), we have finally obtained the magnitude of change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon as: $| \frac{d G}{d R_{b h}} | = \frac{0.07588}{M}$ . To get the nature of variation of free energy, we have plotted the graphs between the magnitude of change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon in XRBs as shown in the Figure 1.

Figure 1 The figure shows the graph plotted between the mass of spinning black holes and their corresponding value of free energy.

From the graph plotted between the magnitude of change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon in XRBs, it is obvious that the magnitude of change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon decreases gradually with increasing the mass of the spinning black holes as the magnitude of change in temperature with corresponding change in the mass in XRBs (Ref last). It should be noted that the mass and radius of the event horizon are the same thing in the case of spinning black holes using G=h=c=1 as clear from equation (39). Hence it can be concluded that the magnitude of change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon is approximately similar to the magnitude of change in temperature of spinning black holes with corresponding change in the mass in XRBs.^17–19

Conclusion

In the present work, we can draw the following conclusions:

The change in Gibb’s free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon depends on the surface gravity, mass, angular velocity and event horizon of spinning black holes
The change in Gibb’s free energy of the spinning black holes of zero surface gravity is zero just like the change in entropy in the reversible process
The change in free energy of spinning black holes of zero angular velocity is directly proportional to the corresponding change in the radius of event horizon
The Gibb’s free energy of the spinning black holes of zero surface gravity is constant just like the entropy in the reversible process
The change in the free energy of spinning black holes w.r.t. the event horizon existing in XRBs remains the same except for those spinning black holes having polar angle [0, 90] degree of lateral grid boundaries
The magnitude of change in free energy of spinning black hole of angular velocity 0.5 per second with about maximum spin is inversely proportional to the mass
The magnitude of change in free energy with corresponding change in the event horizon is approximately similar to the magnitude of change in temperature of spinning black holes with corresponding change in the mass in XRBs.