Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2572-8474

Nursing & Care Open Access Journal

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 1

Occupational hazard preventive measures among nurses in a nigerian tertiary health institution

Seidat Moyosore Ogunnaike, Margaret Omowaleola Akinwaare

Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Correspondence: Margaret O Akinwaare, Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Received: February 07, 2020 | Published: February 14, 2020

Citation: Ogunnaike SM, Akinwaare MO. Occupational hazard preventive measures among nurses in a nigerian tertiary health institution. Nurse Care Open Acces J. 2020;7(1):20-25. DOI: 10.15406/ncoaj.2020.07.00212

Download PDF

Abstract

Introduction: The health of people in a work place is as important as the work they do and this focuses on public health. Nurses are faced with risk of occupational hazards, hence the need for use of personal protective equipment (PPE). This study examined occupational hazard preventive measures among nurses in a Nigerian tertiary health institution.

Method: this study adopted descriptive cross sectional research design using structured questionnaire for data collection. Two hundred and ninety-two (292) questionnaires were distributed but only 264 were retrieved among which 220 were completely filled and therefore included in data analysis. Simple random sampling was used to select study participants. Ethical approval was obtained from UI/UCH ethical committee before data collection. Data software package was used for data analysis.

Results: The findings of this study showed that about two third (66%) of nurses working in the facility have good knowledge of occupational hazard. Respondents confirmed the availability of PPE (79.1%) and occupational health services (83.6%) in their work place. However, physical (99%), chemical (97.7%) and biological (95.5%) hazards were identified as the three commonest forms of hazard been exposed. Also, gloves (99%), goggle (99.5%), gown (99.5%) and face-mask (99.5%) were identified as mostly used PPE. Overall, 163(74%) nurses practise good preventive strategies. Negligence and poor accessibility were mentioned as factors affecting use of PPE.

Conclusion: The study concluded that despite good knowledge of occupational hazards among nurses, many of them don’t use PPE due to lack of organizational policies. It is therefore imperative for health institutions to ensure use of PPE to reduce risk of occupational hazard among nurses.

Keywords: nurses, occupation, hazard, risk, protective equipment

Abbreviations

PPE, personal protective equipment; OH, occupational hazards; UI, university of ibadan; UCH, university college hospital

Introduction

Nursing profession deals with health and most importantly life of the people in the society, hence, it demands a great deal of commitment. Personal fulfilment in nursing practice can be satisfying, yet some health risk associated with the work must be taken into consideration. Due to the nature of their work, nurses are at risk of so many occupational hazards. Nurses are confronted with biological, physical and chemical hazards, during the course of discharging their duties. However, their safety depends on their knowledge of occupational hazards they are exposed to and how they can be prevented.1

Nurses continue to report high levels of job-related injury and illness.2 Working environment, responsibilities, and duties of nurses put them in the frontline of numerous occupational hazards which can be acute or long term. Health outcome includes musculo-skeletal injuries/disorders, infections, changes in mental health, cardiovascular, metabolic and neoplastic diseases.2 Another hazards and work stressors common to nursing practice include the way work is organized in nursing. For example; shift work, long hours and overtime. Irtyah3 reported that shift work exert adverse effects by disturbing circadian rhythm, sleep, family and social life and may also have long term outcomes such as obesity, type two diabetics and cardiovascular diseases. Work related musculoskeletal disorders by definition are a subset of musculoskeletal disorders that arise from occupational exposures.4 The nursing population accounts for 60% of these musculoskeletal disorder. Nurses often conduct patient handling by bending their waist and maintaining an uncomfortable posture towards the opposite side of the bed or chair, increasing the risk of back pain.4 Shift work may be a demanding situation because it raises problems for restoring work and no work activities. Shift schedules that involve night duties also disturb circadian rhythm and put different workload demands and reduce adequate communication and participation in preventive activities than the other work schedules.4 Musculoskeletal disorder has a significant impact on the quality of life.4 They contribute to lost work time or absenteeism and reduced work participation and quality of work output, resulting in a considerable economic burden on the individual, the organization, and the society as a whole.

Occupational hazards are mostly under-reported due to inadequate research. However, literature has revealed a lot of occupational diseases/ injuries in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia with developing countries lacking the necessary expertise and resources to manage it.5 It has also been argued that the management of medical waste poses a very high risk to  healthcare in developing countries. This includes poor handling, collection, sorting, segregation and disposal of medical waste such as sharps, medical devices, and blood and body tissues.5 Unsafe disposal of medical wastes is a major challenge in developing countries as it contributes largely to occupational injuries and infections.5 Additionally, Masum6 and Owie5 found that the increase in occupational health hazards in developing countries are largely blamed on Healthcare Workers (HCWs) not practicing universal safety precautions such as hand washing, wearing of gloves and the usage of Protective Personal Equipment (PPE). This unsafe practice increases the risk of injuries as well as transmission of infections to health care workers.

In Nigeria, the Federal Ministry of Health in 2003 postulated that PPE should be made available to healthcare workers to reduce occupational hazards in the work place. These PPE include; hand hygiene materials, disposable long sleeved gown, goggles or face shield and disposable glove.7 Various national and international health organizations also provided some interventions to reduce occupational hazards among nurses. These interventions include; assessment of policy gap. Implementation of standard precautions, education of healthcare workers and health system manager, development of surveillance system, immunization against Hepatitis B and implementation of appropriate post-exposure follow up including prophylactic medications. In spite of all these measures, many nurses still face the challenges of work place hazards.

It is on this background that this study assessed the knowledge of nurses on occupational hazard associated with their work and use of preventive strategies to reduce exposure to hazard in their work place.

Material and methods

This study adopted descriptive cross-sectional design using quantitative approach. It was carried out in University College Hospital (UCH) Ibadan, a federal health institution which serves as referral centre for other hospitals in and outside Oyo state of Nigeria. The study population were nurses and the sample size was determined using the formula:

n =  N 1+ ( e ) 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqkY=Mj0xXdbba91rFfpec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFf ea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9q8qqaq=dir=f0=yqaiVgFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbsacaWGUb aeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGGGcGaeyypa0JaaiiOaOWaaSaaaeaajugibiaa d6eaaOqaaKqzGeGaaGymaiabgUcaROWaaubiaeqaleqabaqcLbmaca aIYaaaneaakmaabmaaneaajugibiaadwgaa0GaayjkaiaawMcaaaaa aaaaaa@4588@

Where:

n=required sample size

N=the total population size (770 for this study)

e=error of tolerance which is 0.05

Hence,  n =  770 1+770 ( 0.05 ) 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqkY=Mj0xXdbba91rFfpec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFf ea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9q8qqaq=dir=f0=yqaiVgFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbsacaWGUb aeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGGGcGaeyypa0JaaiiOaOWaaSaaaeaajugibiaa iEdacaaI3aGaaGimaaGcbaqcLbsacaaIXaGaey4kaSIaaG4naiaaiE dacaaIWaGcdaqfGaqabSqabeaajugWaiaaikdaa0qaaOWaaeWaa0qa aKqzGeGaaGimaiaac6cacaaIWaGaaGynaaqdcaGLOaGaayzkaaaaaa aaaaa@4B28@

n =263.6

Adjusting the sample size for 10% non response

n =  n 1f MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqkY=Mj0xXdbba91rFfpec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFf ea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9q8qqaq=dir=f0=yqaiVgFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbsacaWGUb aeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGGGcGaeyypa0JaaiiOaOWaaSaaaeaajugibiaa d6gaaOqaaKqzGeGaaGymaiabgkHiTiaadAgaaaaaaa@412E@

n =  263.6 10.1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqkY=Mj0xXdbba91rFfpec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFf ea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9q8qqaq=dir=f0=yqaiVgFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbsacaWGUb aeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGGGcGaeyypa0JaaiiOaOWaaSaaaeaajugibiaa ikdacaaI2aGaaG4maiaac6cacaaI2aaakeaajugibiaaigdacqGHsi slcaaIWaGaaiOlaiaaigdaaaaaaa@4522@

n=292

Simple random sampling technique will be used for this research study to select two hundred and ninety-two nurses. The instrument used for this study will be a self-developed questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed by the researcher. Face and content validity of the instrument was ensured through a thorough literature review and contributions from experts. The questionnaire was subjected to split-half technique reliability method and a correlation coefficient of 0.8 was considered to be reliable. Ethical approval was obtained from University of Ibadan/University College Hospital ethical review committee before commencement of data collection. The respondents were met at their duty post, informed consent was obtained and questionnaire was administered face to face and same was retrieved immediately.

Results

Socio-Demographic Characteristics

The mean age of the respondents was 34.8±9.5years. Majority 130(54.1%) of the nurses were below age 35years. More than two-thirds 191(80.0%) of the nurses were female while almost half 104(49.5%) of them were Nursing Officers. More than half of them have one to ten years post qualification experience (Table 1).

Variables

Frequency(N)

Percentage(%)

Age-group

 

 

<35years

130

54.1

≥35years

110

45.8

Sex

 

 

Male

49

20.4

Female

191

80

Religion

 

 

Christianity

185

77

Islam

55

22.9

Marital status

 

 

Married

126

63

Single

70

35

Divorced

4

2

Educational status

 

 

RN

28

13.3

RN and post basic diploma

64

30.4

BNSc

96

45.7

Postgraduate

22

10.4

Present Position

 

 

nursing officer

104

49.5

Senior nursing officer

42

20

ACNO

30

14.2

CNO

30

14.2

AND

4

1.9

Ward/Unit

 

 

Maternity and O&G ward

38

17.1

medical ward

75

33.7

surgical ward

82

26.9

Accident & emergency ward

27

12.1

Years of experience

 

 

(1-5)years

88

42.1

(5-10)years

52

24.8

(11-15)years

34

16.2

≥15years

35

18.5

Table 1 Distribution of socio-demographic variables

Knowledge of respondents on occupational hazard

The mean knowledge score of the respondents was 93.5±6.8. In this study, the level of knowledge of the nurses about OH varies significantly (Table 2). Findings from the study show that more than two-thirds 127(66.1%) of the nurses working in the facility had good knowledge (Table 1).

Statement

YES

NO

% score

Occupational hazard is a potential risk of a health of a person

 

 

99.47917

 

191(99.5)   

0(0.00)   

 

Occupational hazard emerges from an unhealthy environment

 

 

91.14583   

 

175(92.1)

15(7.9)

 

Does Occupational hazard affect the mental, physical well-being of the nurses

 

 

98.4375

 

189(98.4)

1(0.5)

 

Are nurses at high risk of occupational hazard

 

 

84.89583

 

163(84.9)

0(0.00)

 

Mean Score %

 

 

93.48958

Table 2 Knowledge on occupational hazards

Classification of occupational hazard

Majority (96.3%) of the study participants classified cut from scalpel as physical hazard while a high percentage (84.1%) of them classified infection as biological hazard. Also, poison was classified by majority (81.5%) as chemical hazard (Table 4).

Level of knowledge of  OH

Frequency

Percentage

Mean±SD

Poor

65

33.9

93.5±6.8

Good

127

66.1

 

Table 3 Cumulative knowledge score

 

Classification of hazards

 

physical hazards       

Biological hazards       

Chemical hazards       

Psychological hazards       

Sociological hazards       

Back pain

152(76.0)

44(22.0)

1(0.5)

3(1.5)

0.(0.00)

Varicose vein

94(47.0)

99(49.5)

7(2.5)

0.(0.00)

0.(0.00)

Poison

10(5.1)

25(12.8)

159(81.5)

1(0.5)

0.(0.00)

Infection

19(9.9)

159(84.1)

10(5.2)

1(0.5)

0.(0.00)

Skin disorder

47(25.1)

123(65.8)

12(6.4)

2(1.1)

3(1.6)

Fatigue

80(42.1)

24(12.6)

2(1.0)

76(40.0)

8(4.2)

Assault

150(77.3)

6(3.0)

2(1.0)

26(13.4)

10(4.1)

Stress

41(20.5)

12(10.0)

0(0.00)

130(65.0)

17(8.5)

Fall

182(93.8)

0(0.00)

0(0.00)

12(6.1)

0(0.00)

Cut from scalpel

183(96.3)

2(1.1)

0(0.00)

5(2.6)

0(0.00)

Table 4 Distribution of classifications of occupational hazards

Preventive Strategies of Occupational Hazards

The study revealed that almost one-quarter 49(25.5%) of the nurses had poor preventive strategies for OH (Table 6). However, more than two-thirds 150(78.9%) of the nurses had protective device in their respective wards as nurses. More than two-thirds 180(93.8%) had gone for pre-employment check-up before employed into the facility (Table 5).

Preventive Strategies

Yes(%)

No(%)

 

Are there protective devices for nurses in your ward

150(78.9)

40(21.1)

78.12500

Did you go for pre-employment medical checkup before you were employed

 

180(93.8)

 

12(6.3)

93.7500

Does individual has a role in preventing occupational hazards

189(99.0)

2(1.0)

98.43750

Is wearing of gloves a means of preventing occupational hazards

187(98.9)     

2(1.1)

97.39583

Is wearing of gown, goggle and face mask a means of preventing occupational hazards

 

191(99.5)

 

1(0.5)

99.47917

Practicing proper hand washing before and after each procedure prevent occupational hazards

 

189(99.0)

 

2(1.0)      

98.43750     

Immunization against hepatitis B can help prevent occupational hazards

186(98.9)

2(1.1)

96.87500

Do you know about aseptic technique

187(99.5)

1(0.5)

97.39583

Safe and proper disposal of needle prevent occupational hazards

186(98.9)

2(1.1)

96.87500

Does proper waste disposal help in preventing occupational hazards

184(98.4)

3(1.6)

95.83333

Can increase in the  number of break time reduce the risk of occupational hazards

 

116(62.7)

 

69(37.3)

60.41667

Not recapping needle after use can prevent occupational hazards

164(88.6)

21(11.4)

85.41667

Do you have functional fire bridge service

90(48.9)

94(51.1)

46.87500

Is fire bridge service relevant to your practice

160(86.5)

25(13.5)     

83.33333

Is occupational health service department available in your hospital

 

156(83.9)

 

30(16.1)

81.25000

Does the organization have a role in the prevention of occupational hazards

 

177(94.1)

 

11(5.9)

92.18750

Mean Score %

 

 

87.63021

Table 5 Distribution of preventive strategies of occupational hazards

Preventive Strategies of  OH

N

%

Mean±SD

Poor

49

25.5

87.6±16.1

Good

143

74.5

 

Table 6 Cumulative preventive strategies score

Factors affecting the use of PPE

The study (Table 7) provides information on factors affecting the use of PPE as; inadequate knowledge of PPE (95.8%); non-availability of the PPE (98.4%); negligence (94.2%); poor accessibility (94.2%); urgent patients need (68.1%); lack of training and retraining (96.8%) and inadequate organizational policies (91.6%).

Factors

Yes(%)

No(%)       

p-value     

Does inadequate knowledge about PPE affect the use of the device

183(95.8)

8(4.2)

0.002

Non-availability of the PPE can also affect the use of PPE

188(98.4)

3(1.6)

0.001

Can negligence affect the use of PPE

180(94.2)

11(5.8)

0.121

Time factor place a role in the use of PPE

116(61.7)

72(38.3)

0.001

Does PPE slows down work

57(30.3)

131(69.7)

0.599

Reaction to the use of latex gloves can also affect the use of PPE

151(79.9)

38(20.1)

0.128

Poor accessibility to the use of PPE can affect its utilization

179(94.2)

11(5.8)

0.874

Urgent patients’ needs can affect the use of PPE

126(68.1)

59(31.9)

0.03

Inadequate organizational policies about the use of PPE can also affect its utilization

174(91.6)

16(8.4)

0.067

Lack of storage of PPE can also affect its utilization

181(95.3)     

9(4.7)

0.568

Lack of training and retraining on safety measures and the use of PPE can also affect its utilization    

184(96.8)

6(3.2)

0.622

Table 7 Distribution of Factors affecting the use of personal protective equipment

Hypotheses testing

Hypothesis one: There is no significant relationship between years of experience and level of knowledge about occupational hazard (Table 8).

 

Knowledge

 

Chi-square statistic

p-value

Years of experience

Poor

good

χ2

 

(1-5)years

28(44.4%)

50(39.7%)

 

 

(5-10)years

17(27.0%)

27(21.4%)

5.166

0.16

(11-15)years

12(19.0%)

20(15.9%)

 

 

>15years

6(9.6%)

29(23.0%)

 

 

Table 8 Cross tabulation of years of experience and level of knowledge about occupational hazard

Result shows that relationship between years of experience and level of knowledge about occupational hazard is not statistically significant at p=0.160. This means that year of experience does not significantly influence the level of knowledge about OH.

Hypothesis two: There is no significant relationship between knowledge about occupational hazard and level of preventive strategies

The relationship between knowledge about occupational hazard and level of preventive strategies is statistically significant at p=0.001. This implies that knowledge about OH significantly influences its level of preventive strategies (Table 9).

 

Preventive strategies

 

Chi-square statistic

p-value

Knowledge

Poor

good

χ2

 

Poor

3(6.1%)

62(43.4%)

22.594

0.001

Good

46(93.9%)

81(56.6%)

 

 

Table 9 Cross tabulation of knowledge about occupational hazard and preventive strategies

Discussion

The notable adequate knowledge of occupational hazard among the respondents is actually commendable. However, the level of poor knowledge (39.9%) is also unacceptably high especially because the respondents are nurses who are supposed to be involved in providing information on occupational hazards to members of the society. This could be responsible for high level of work-related injury and illness among nurses as reported by Caruso.2 Similarly, Apexa4 reported that nurses account for 60% of work-related musculo-skeletal disorders among hospital healthcare workers. Therefore, training and re-training of nurses on safety measures and the use of PPE is highly essential to improve their knowledge and safety. 

Furthermore, previous studies8,9 identified factors influencing use of PPE. Such as; lack of training, non-availability of PPE and poor accessibility. This study in addition to these factors also identifies factors such as; inadequate knowledge, negligence, inadequate organizational policies about the use of PPE. Hence, management and policy issues around the use of PPE become important factors that need intervention to ensure the safety of nurses in their workplace.

In addition, the relationship between years of experience and level of knowledge about OH is not statistically significant meaning that years of working experience among nurses do not significantly influence the level of knowledge about OH.

Conclusion

The major OH encountered by nurses was biological, physical, chemical and psychological hazards during the course of discharging their duties. The safety of nurses in their workplace depends on availability and accessibility to PPE. Good knowledge of OH is needed to understand occupational health and safety. Majority of the nurses had good knowledge about OH. Insufficient knowledge about OH may due to inadequate training on occupational health and safety. Knowledge about OH may be positively influenced through training and retraining occupational health and safety, hence the need for training and retraining of nurses on how to prevent themselves from exposure to OH. Occupational health and safety is a focus of public health.

Recommendations

Based on the conclusion in line with our discussion, the following recommendation should be put into consideration:

  1. Regular training on occupational health and safety should be organized for nurses in different cadres to improve the knowledge about OH.
  2. Hospital policies which may affect utilization of PPE should be amended.
  3. PPE should be made available in all wards, laboratories and office in order to prevent occurrence of OH.
  4. Risk assessment should be carried out regularly to identify potential risks among Nurses and in the wards in the hospital.

Funding details

None.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

Creative Commons Attribution License

©2020 Ogunnaike, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.