Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2379-6294

Toxicology

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 2

Seasonal variation and behavior of 210Pb in the soil and sediment of Hemavathi riverine environment

Kaliprasad CS, Narayana Y

Department of Studies in Physics, Mangalore University, India

Correspondence: Kaliprasad CS, Department of Studies in Physics, Mangalore University, Mangalagangothri-574199, India

Received: December 25, 2017 | Published: April 20, 2018

Citation: Kaliprasad CS, Narayana Y. Seasonal variation and behavior of 210Pb in the soil and sediment of Hemavathi riverine environment. MOJ Toxicol. 2018;4(2):85–91. DOI: 10.15406/mojt.2018.04.00095

Download PDF

Abstract

In the present study, discuss the seasonal variation of 210Pb in the soil and sediment of Hemavathi River Environment. The samples were collected in pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons and the concentration of 210Pb was determined using standard radiochemical analytical method. The mean activity concentration of 210Pb in soil was found to be 12.19Bqkg-1 and 5.41Bqkg-1 in monsoon and pre-monsoon respectively. The mean activity concentration of 210Pb in sediment was found to be 12.87Bqkg-1 and 6.17Bqkg-1 in monsoon and pre-monsoon respectively. The activity was high in monsoon as compared to the pre-monsoon.

Keywords: polinum-210, lead-210, radiochemical method, soil, hemavathi, sediment

Introduction

The radioactivity is everywhere in the earth including the human body. All radioactive sources emit radiations which cause biological damage to the human population. Among the varies radiation sources natural background radiations are important. The naturally radiation comes from terrestrial and cosmic rays, which is derived essentially from the 238U and 232Th series and single occurring 40K. The concentration of radionuclides from terrestrial sources changes with locations and altitude. The average dose rate received by population was value of 2.4mSv per year.1 Among the naturally occurring radionuclides 210Pb is a member of 238U series, which results from the intermediate decay of 226Ra to the noble gas, 222Rn by alpha disintegration. It also comes from the wet precipitation or dry deposition of 222Rn. This atmospheric addition of 210Pb is in excess of the amount supplied by the in situ decay of 226Ra. Background or supported 210Pb is assumed to be in equilibrium with the decay of 226Ra without the negligible loss of radionuclides. Lead-210 is highly reactive and is readily scavenged by organic matter and clay particles, but under anoxic conditions, 210Pb can be released back to the water column. 210Pb is removed from the water column to the sediment by scavenging. Chemical adsorption onto particulate matter facilitates transport over long distances before its final deposition in the sediment. The activity of 210Pb at the sediment surface is the result of interplay between accumulation, sediment mixing, and radioactive decay. Therefore, it is important to understand the concentration and behavior of lead in an aquatic environment. The published data on 210Pb in aquatic environs is important and so an attempt was made in the present investigation to study the Seasonal variation of 210Pb in the soil and sediment of Hemavathi River environ. Seasonal variations are important to understand the behavior of 210Pb activity with different seasons, because of heavy rain fall in rainy season and high temperature in pre-monsoon may affects the changes in activity concentration.

Materials and methods

Study area

Hemavati River is one of the major rivers in South Karnataka. The river originates at Ballala Rayana Durga in Western Ghats, which is 1,219m above the sea level. The river covers the areas of Chikmagalur, Hassan and Mysore districts before joining River Cauvery near Krishnarajasagara. Hemavathi River basin has a drainage area of about 5,410km², a 245km in length and is located between 12013'-1308'18" N latitudes and 75032'4" - 76038' E longitudes.2 The river basin consists of Major drainage pattern is dendritic to sub dendritic.3

Sample collection

Figure 1 shows the sampling stations along River Hemavathi. The Sampling station H1 and H14 corresponds to the upper and lower reaches of the river. The soil and sediment samples were collected from the river bank and river drainage respectively with following standard procedures (EML).4 For the seasonal variation “analysis” the samples were collected from January and August. The collected sample was stored in polyethylene bags and brought to the laboratory for the further processing. The samples were dried in an air circulated oven till constant dry weight is obtained.5

Figure 1 Hemavathi river basin map.

Physico-chemical parameters

The organic matter in the soil and sediment was measured by using the weight loss-on-ignition method6 at an ignition temperature of 550 ºC for 24h. Other physico-chemical parameters were measured by using standard protocol.7,8 In the present investigation the sand, silt and clay fractions were separated to find the type of soil and sediment. About 20g of sediment or soil sample was taken in a beaker; added 30% of H2O2 to remove organic matter and 10% acetic acid to remove carbonate material present in the samples. After washing 2 to 3 times, sand was separated through wet sieving ASTM 230 sieve. Based on Stokes law for settling particles, the solution was collected at a depth of 20cm, within a time interval of 20 seconds to set the solution with the required size fraction, to determine (Silt+clay) %.9 Based on this at room temperature of about 25-30 ºC, the solution was collected with a 20ml bulb type pipette at 5cm in the water column after allowing the settling column to stand without disturbing, for 3hours, 36 minutes. The collected 20ml gives the clay fraction (<2 microns), which is dried in a beaker.9 The clay percentage was determined using the equation given below

Clay ( % )=[ W1W2 20×m ]×100×1000 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaqGdbGaaeiBaiaabggacaqG5bGaaeiOamaabmaapaqaa8qa caqGLaaacaGLOaGaayzkaaGaeyypa0ZaamWaa8aabaWdbmaalaaapa qaa8qacaqGxbGaaGymaiabgkHiTiaabEfacaaIYaaapaqaa8qacaaI YaGaaGimaiabgEna0kaab2gaaaaacaGLBbGaayzxaaGaey41aqRaaG ymaiaaicdacaaIWaGaey41aqRaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaGaaGimaaaa @52ED@

Where, W1is the weight of the beaker after drying with clay,

W2 is weight of the empty beaker

m is the mass of the soil taken

20 represent 20ml

1000 represents the total volume of solution i.e., L

Sample processing and activity determination

The 210Pb activity was determined by using chemical deposition method.10,11 A known weight of sample was taken in a beaker 4M HNO3. The organic matter present in the sample was removed by adding 3:1 HNO3 and HClO4 mixture in small increments until a white residue appears. The samples were then converted into 1M HCl medium and 210Po in the solution was deposited onto the brightly polished back ground counted (both sides) silver disk using magnetic stirrer at 97 ºC for 6h continuously. The disk was then washed with distilled water, rinsed with alcohol, dried under an infrared lamp and then counts were noted on both sides using ZnS(Ag) alpha counter of 0.005cps background and 30% efficiency. The activity of 210Pb was estimated through 210Po by allowing the 210Po plated solution for a period of 12 months to build-up 210Po from 210Pb.11,12 The total net count was obtained from both sides of the silver planchet, for a counting time period of 2000 seconds. The activity concentration of Polonium-210 was calculated using the following equation Iyengar et al.5

A=( S±SD )× 100 E × 100 E P × 1000 W   Bqk g 1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaieaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGbbGaeyypa0ZaaeWaa8aabaWdbiaadofacqGHXcqScaWG tbGaamiraaGaayjkaiaawMcaaiabgEna0oaalaaapaqaa8qacaaIXa GaaGimaiaaicdaa8aabaWdbiaadweaaaGaey41aq7aaSaaa8aabaWd biaaigdacaaIWaGaaGimaaWdaeaapeGaamyra8aadaWgaaqaa8qaca WGqbaapaqabaaaa8qacqGHxdaTdaWcaaWdaeaapeGaaGymaiaaicda caaIWaGaaGimaaWdaeaapeGaam4vaaaacaGGGcGaaiiOaiaadkeaca WGXbGaam4AaiaadEgal8aadaahaaqcfayabeaajugWa8qacqGHsisl caaIXaaaaaaa@5A2B@

Where,

S is the net counts per second

SD is the standard deviation

E is the efficiency (%) of alpha counter, determined as described in Section2.3

Ep is the plating efficiency (%), determined using 210Po standard and was found to be 90% and

W is the weight of the dry sample taken for analysis in gram.

Result and discussions

The activity concentration of 210Pb in soil and sediment samples from Hemavathi river environment as shown in Table 1. The highest activity in soil was found to be 27.441.6 Bq kg-1 and 10.411.01Bqkg-1 in monsoon and pre-monsoon, respectively. But lowest activity was found 7.510.8 Bq kg-1 and 2.770.52Bqkg-1 in monsoon and pre-monsoon respectively. The highest activity in sediment was found to be 22.551.4Bqkg-1 and14.881.21Bq kg-1 in monsoon and pre-monsoon respectively. But lowest activity was found 6.010.7Bqkg-1 and 2.570.50Bqkg-1 in monsoon and pre-monsoon respectively. The activity concentration was varied from location to location as changes with seasons. The activity was high in monsoon as compared to the pre-monsoon. The higher activity concentration in monsoon was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001). The variation is due to the deposition of 210Pb at an individual location depends on the efficiency of removal by rain and 222Rn concentration in air. Because of grandparent radioactive inert gas 222Rn, it has been enter to the atmosphere from geological sources, 210Pb is attached with submicron-size aerosols which are removed by precipitation and deposited on the earth's surface.13 In sediment the activity concentration of 210Pb depends on the geology of the location, weathering concentration and drainage pattern of the river,14 while the geochemistry of the parent radionuclide and its speciation also play a significant role.15 Kaliprasad & Narayana3 reported the values of Physico-chemical parameter. The physico-chemical parameters of the samples are useful to know the behavior of radionuclides in soil and sediment. Therefore, we have measured the physico-chemical parameters such as pH, Moisture, Organic matter and granulometric content like silt, clay, sand, in soil and sediment as shown in Table 2 for pre-monsoon and monsoon respectively. The pH value of soil and sediment samples varies from 5.06 to 8.21and 5.27 to 8.58 in pre-monsoon and it was varies from 5.17 to 9.14 and 6.24 to 10.7 in monsoon soil and sediment samples respectively. The mean organic matter content (%) in soil was 5.22 and 6.64, and it was in sediment 2.61 and 3.45, in pre-monsoon and monsoon respectively. The mean moisture (%) in pre-monsoon samples was 1.43 and 21.16, but in monsoon it was 18.19 and 18.76 for soil and sediment respectively. the moisture (%) in soil samples of monsoon was high in due to rain as compared to pre-monsoon. The granulometric parameters of soil and sediment samples shows that soil samples are sandy loam and loamy sand type, but the sediment samples shows sand type in pre-monsoon and in monsoon it shows more clay content. The organic matter and 210Pb shows good correlation in both seasons.

 

210Pb activity (Bqkg-1)

Sampling
Location

Monsoon

Pre-monsoon

Soil

Sediment

Soil

Sediment

H1

27.44 ± 1.6

16.91±1.2

4.06±0.63

2.87±0.53

H2

15.03 ±1.1

10.33±0.9

10.41±1.01

14.88±1.21

H3

6.76 ± 0.7

9.39±0.9

4.66±0.68

5.85±0.76

H4

8.45 ± 0.8

17.85±1.2

3.07±0.55

3.47±0.58

H5

17.85 ± 1.2

12.21±1.0

9.42±0.96

3.96±0.62

H6

7.51 ± 0.8

13.15±1.1

6.05±0.77

3.37±0.57

H7

7.51 ± 0.8

11.09±1.0

3.47±0.58

3.86±0.61

H6

12.96 ± 1.1

18.79±1.3

8.23±0.90

8.33±0.90

H9

12.21 ± 1.0

6.01±0.7

6.15±0.78

9.62±0.97

H10

11.46 ± 1.0

22.55±1.4

4.36±0.65

7.83±0.88

H11

14.09 ± 1.1

10.52±0.9

2.77±0.52

2.57±0.50

H12

9.39 ± 0.9

9.02±0.9

4.46±0.66

7.93±0.88

H13

11.84 ± 1.0

12.21±1.0

2.48±0.49

3.96±0.62

H14

8.08 ± 0.8

10.15±0.9

6.15±0.78

7.93±0.88

Mean

12.19

12.87

5.41

6.17

Table 1 Seasonal variation of 210Pb activity in soil and sediments of Hemavathi River

H-mon

Moisture (%)

Organic Matter (%)

pH

Silt (%)

Clay (%)

Sand (%)

Soil

 

 

 

 

 

 

Range

7.8-49.38

2.81-15.45

5.17-9.14

6.00-20.00

11.31-40.88

32.54-82.69

Mean

18.19

6.64

6.63

16.23

26.68

57.09

Median

16.49

5.70

6.34

14.80

22.42

63.16

Stdev

10.40

3.71

1.40

7.28

11.76

16.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sediment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Range

3.48-39.77

0.62-7.03

6.24-10.7

1.2-8.81

10.6-39.4

51.39-85.39

Mean

18.76

3.45

8.59

6.12

15.62

78.26

Median

17.08

2.70

8.30

5.21

13.26

80.26

Stdev

9.11

2.59

1.24

3.29

7.15

8.52

Table 2 Physico-chemical parameters of Hemavathi river soil and sediment in monsoon

Using the SPSS statistical tool to analyze the correlation between physico-chemical parameters and radionuclides are shown in Table 3. The organic matter and 210Pb shows good correlation with correlation coefficient 0.604 and 0.544 in pre-monsoon soil and sediment samples and it was 0.676 and 0.733 in monsoon soil and sediment respectively. The clay of pre-monsoon soil and 210Pb show correlation with correlation coefficient 0.613. 210Pb activity also has shown good correlation with moisture (%). The statistics of the value corresponding to the 210Pb in soil and sediment has shown in Table 4. The frequency distribution graphs are shown in (Figures 2) (Figure 3). The skewness of the soil and sediment in both the seasons showed positive. The kurtosis of pre-monsoon soil shows negative and all other samples shows positive. The values of kurtosis indicate the flat and peaked distribution as per positive and negative respectively. The values of skewness and kurtosis indicate the normal distribution. The 210Pb activity as compared with other region of the world is shown in Table 4. The present 210Pb value is less than the values reported for kali, Sharavthi and Netravathi River, but the values are higher than HBR Kerala.1621

Pre monsoon

 Soil

Moisture (%)

Organic matter

PH

Silt (%)

Clay (%)

Sand (%)

Pb

 

Moisture (%)

1

Organic matter

0.653

1

PH

0.023

-0.4

1

Silt (%)

0.197

0.553

-0.315

1

Clay (%

0.572

0.68

-0.225

0.143

1

Sand (%)

-0.556

-0.819

0.336

-0.608

-0.873

1

Pb

0.855

0.604

-0.153

0.153

0.613

-0.567

1

sediment

Moisture (%)

Organic matter

PH

silt(%)

Clay(%)

sand(%)

Pb

Moisture (%)

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Organic matter

0.603

1

 

 

 

 

 

PH

-0.766

-0.514

1

 

 

 

 

Silt (%)

0.642

0.579

-0.405

1

 

 

 

Clay (%)

0.179

-0.312

-0.355

-0.185

1

 

 

Sand (%)

-0.669

-0.262

0.597

-0.707

-0.564

1

 

Pb

0.126

0.544

-0.133

0.53

-0.335

-0.205

1

Monsoon

Soil

Moisture (%)

Organic matter

PH

Silt (%)

Clay (%)

Sand (%)

Pb

Moisture (%)

1

Organic matter

0.678

1

PH

-0.49

-0.465

1

Silt (%)

0.634

0.839

-0.431

1

Clay (%)

0.062

0.443

0.164

0.498

1

Sand (%)

-0.321

-0.681

0.073

-0.79

-0.925

1

Pb

0.393

0.676

-0.292

0.341

0.065

-0.195

1

Sediment

Moisture (%)

Organic matter

PH

Silt (%)

Clay (%)

Sand (%)

Pb

Moisture (%)

1

Organic matter

0.3

1

PH

-0.278

-0.509

1

Silt (%)

0.345

0.169

-0.514

1

Clay (%)

0.314

0.259

-0.125

0.224

1

Sand (%)

-0.397

-0.283

0.304

-0.575

-0.926

1

Pb

0.187

0.733

-0.373

-0.137

-0.008

0.059

1

Table 3 Pearson correlation matrix among the variables bold values in the table represent the better positive correlation between the variables

210Pb (Bqkg-1)

 

 210Pb(Bqkg-1)

 

Premonsoon

Monsoon

 River

Reference

Soil

Sediment

Soil

Sediment

Mean

5.41

6.18

12.19

12.88

23-108

Padubidri

Prakash16

Median

4.56

4.91

11.65

11.65

8.1-71.1

Kali river

Rajashekara17

Maximum

10.42

14.88

27.44

22.56

5.7–15.1

HBR, Kerala

Narayana et al.18

Minimum

2.48

2.58

6.77

6.02

8-113.1

Sharvathi

Rajashekara KM et al.17

St. DEV

2.48

3.46

5.47

4.54

2.9-62.7

Netrvathi

Rajashekara KM etal.17

Skewness

0.85

1.23

1.78

0.79

29.6-253.4

Goa region

Avadani et al.19

Kurtosis

-0.19

1.64

4.01

0.1

22.2-122.1

Black forest

Schuettelkopf & kiefer20

Frequency

peaked

normal

normal

normal

3.6-45.2

Mangalore, India

Radhakrishna et al.21

Table 4 Statistical analysis and comparison of 210Pb activity with other area

  • Figure 2 The frequency distribution of 210Pb activity in pre-monsoon soil and sediment.

  • Figure 3 The frequency distribution of 210Pb activity in monsoon soil and sediment.

Conclusion

The activity concentration of 210Pb was measured in the soil and sediment of Hemavathi river compared with the other reported values. Studies were conducted to study the seasonal variations. The seasonal variation is statistically significant. The mean activity in monsoon was higher than pre-monsoon in both soil and sediment. A good correlation observed between organic matter and the activity concentration of 210Pb in soil and sediment of both the seasons. 210Pb was increased with increase organic matter and clay, moisture also influence to increase the activity concentration. The data will helpful to understand the basic dynamics of radionuclides in soil and sediment phase of different seasons.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. UNSCEAR. Sources effects and risk of ionizing radiation Report to General Assembly. United Nations: New York; 1998.
  2. Kaliprasad CS, Narayana Y. Radon concentration in water, soil and sediment of Hemavathi River environments. Indoor and Built environment. 2017.
  3. Kaliprasad CS, Narayana Y. Distribution of 210po in hemavathi riverine environment. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;171(2):282–286.
  4. EML Procedure Manual. Edited by Herbert L volchok and Gail dePlanque. 26th ed. Environment Measurement Laboratory; 1983.
  5. Iyengar MAR. Studies on the distribution of natural radioactivity in marine organisms. Ph.D. thesis. University of Bombay: India; 1983.
  6. LEE MH, Lee CW, Boo CB. Distribution and characteristics of 239,240Pu and 137Cs in the soil of Korea. J Environ Radioactivity. 1997;37(1):1–16.
  7. Narayana Y, Rajashekara KM. The importance of physico–chemical parameterson the speciation of natural radionuclides in riverine ecosystems. J Environ Radioact. 2010;101(11):958–964.
  8. Saxena MM. Environmental analysis water, soil and air. Agro Botanicla publishers: India; 1987.
  9. Roy CL. A practical approach to sedimentalogy. In: Alen, Unwin, editors. London; 1987.
  10. Iyengar MAR. Studies on the distribution of natural radioactivity in marine organisms. Ph.D. thesis. University of Bombay: India; 1983.
  11. Narayana Y, Shetty PK, Siddappa K. Behavior of 210Po and 210Pb in high background areas of costal kerala on the south west cost of India. Applied Radiation and isotopes 2006;64(3):396–401.
  12. Kaliprasad CS, Narayana Y. Speciation and behavior of 210Po and 210Pb in the riverine ecosystem of Cauvery, a major river of south India. Radiochemistry. 2016;58(4):431–437.
  13. Venunathan N, Narayana Y. Activity of 210Po and 210Pb in the river environs of coastal Kerala on southwest coast of India. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Science. 2016;9(4):392–399.  
  14. Ugur A, Yeener G, Bassari A. Trace metals and 210Po (210Pb) concentration in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) consumed at western Anatolia. Appl Radiat Isot. 2002;57(4):565–571.
  15. Skwarzec B, Struminska DI, Borylo A, et al. Intake of 210Po, 234U and 238U radionuclides in beer in Poland. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2004;261(3):661–663.
  16. Prakash V, Narayana Y. Enrichment of 210Po and 210Pb in the Padubidri environs of karantaka. International j nuclear energy science and Technology. 2007;3(4):378–385
  17. Rajashekara KM, Narayana Y, Siddappa K. Distribution of 210Po and 210Pb in riverine environs of coastal Karnataka. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2008;277(2):379–388.
  18. Narayana Y, Shetty PK, Siddappa K. Behavior of 210Po and 210Pb in high background areas of coastal Kerala on the south west coast. Appl Radiat Isot. 2006;64(3):396–401.
  19. Avadhani DN, Mahesh HM, Karunakara N, et al. Distribution and Behaviour of 210Po and 210Pb in soil samples of Goa, South west coast of India. Rad Prot Env. 2001;24(1&2):401–405.
  20. Schuttelkopf H, Kiefer H. Radium–226 and Polonium–210 concentration of Black forest. Natural Radiation Environment. In: Vohra KG, Mishra UC, Pillai KC, editor. Proceedings of the 2nd special symposium. Wiley Eastern Ltd: Bombay; 1982. p. 194–200.
  21. Radhakrishna AP, Somasekarapa HM, Narayana Y, et al. A new natural background radiation area on the southwest coast of India. Health Phys. 1993;65:390–395.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Kaliprasad, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.