Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2574-9773

Polymer Science

Research Article Volume 1 Issue 4

DFT study of photoelectric properties of some organic polymers

Kuevi Urbain Amah

Department of Chemistry, Abomey-Calavi University, Benin

Correspondence: Kuevi Urbain Amah, Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy (LACTHESMO), Department of Chemistry, Abomey-Calavi University, Benin, 03 BP: 3409 Cotonou Benin and 01 BP 1326 Cotonou Benin, Tel (+229)950-699-02, 660-302-97

Received: September 15, 2017 | Published: October 3, 2017

Citation: Amah KU. DFT study of photoelectric properties of some organic polymers. MOJ Poly Sci. 2017;1(4):150-156. DOI: 10.15406/mojps.2017.01.00023

Download PDF

Abstract

Polyacetylens noted PA, with general formulae ( CH = CH ) n MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqbaoaabmaake aajugibabaaaaaaaaapeGaeyOeI0Iaam4qaiaadIeacaqGGaGaeyyp a0JaaeiiaiaadoeacaWGibGaeyOeI0cak8aacaGLOaGaayzkaaqcfa 4aaSbaaKazfa0=baqcLbmacaWGUbaajuaGbeaaaaa@4533@  are organic compounds with double conjugated bonds. They are the thirst polymers conducting characters which, after doping, were highlighted. Indeed, the semiconducting character of an organic material resides in the alternation of single and double covalent bonds; the π bonds electrons, in these conditions, are able to be delocalization. That delocalisation assures the transport of charges. The substitution derivatives of these compounds may exhibit better conduction capabilities. Since AP and their derivatives, like many other organic conjugated materials, absorb electromagnetic waves in the visible range of the spectrum, they are used as photovoltaic materials, essential parts of organic solar cells. The present work focused on the theoretical study of the evolution of the photovoltaic character of PA and their halogenated derivatives as a function of their polymerization index (n, n = 1 to 5); this study was carried out consideration the energy gaps between the LUMO and the HOMO of the molecules involved in this work and confirmed the experimental results known in the literature.

The calculations were performed by the DFT / B3LYP method in the 6-31g+(d,p) orbital basis. The Gaussian program in its versions 98, 03 and 09 was used to perform these calculations on the HPL1908w, Samsung Intel® Core i3-3110 CPU and Dell computers. After comparing the differences between the LUMO of the molecules, it has been proposed to use photovoltaic "donor-acceptor" combinations based on anthracene and polyacetylene.

Keywords: Polyacetylens; Anthracene; Photovoltaic conjugated organic materials; LUMO; HOMO; DFT/B3LYP; Base 6-31g+(d,p)

Abbreviations

LUMO: Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital; HUMO: Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital; D/A: Donor-Acceptor; PPP: Poly (Para-Phenylene); PT: Polythiophene; PA: Polyacetylene

Introduction

Given the dizzying growth in global energy needs and the surge in crude oil prices, the diversification of energy sources and, above all, the use of renewable sources of energy that respects the environment are increasingly emerging as the best alternative to curbing the crisis.1 Among the renewable energy sources the solar energy, practically inexhaustible, is by far the most available natural source of energy, clean and accessible at every point of the earth's surface.1,2 It can therefore be an excellent solution to the problem of energy supply in the world and especially in the sunny geographical areas of the globe.

The 99% of the photovoltaic cells produced today in the world, to tame and to use the solar energy, are based on silicon, material of which the growing demand in the electronic field raises the problem of its availability. Moreover, the production of this material requires truly polluting and costly purification processes which make it impossible for ordinary people to acquire and use silicon-based solar panels as a source of energy.1 This is why, worldwide, research teams are working to find other materials with interesting semiconductor properties. In this stride, organic molecules or polymers are increasingly explored and used as semiconductor materials in the design of photovoltaic cells. However, in this scientific endeavor, one of the challenges still remains the improvement of the electrical conversion efficiency of these organic semiconductors.1-3 The semiconducting properties of organic materials come from the alternation of single and double covalent bonds in their molecular structures.1-5 This electronic conjugation which favors the delocalisation and the circulation of the electronic charges can then constitute a first criterion for the selection of the molecules likely to be involved in the design of an organic photovoltaic cell. The photovoltaic effect is a phenomenon which consists in generating electricity by absorption and conversion of light energy into electrical energy. An organic solar cell consists of a layer of photoactive organic materials sandwiched between two electrodes:1,2

  1. The active layer consists, on the one hand, of electron-donating organic molecules (D), possessing a low ionization potential and permitting the transport of holes, and, on the other hand, of organic electron accepting molecules (A), having a high electron affinity and enabling the electron transport.
  2. The anode, generally composed of indium and tin oxide, is deposited on a glass or transparent plastic substrate,
  3. The cathode, traditionally composed of metals with low extraction activity, is deposited by evaporation on the active layer.

The phenomenon of conversion of light into electricity in organic photovoltaic cells is a complex process combining the absorption of photons in the active layer, the diffusion of the excitons formed, their dissociation as well as the transport and collection of charges -5]. The prediction of the optimum conditions for carrying out such a process can theoretically be achieved on the basis of certain molecular, electronic and spectroscopic parameters such as molecular orbital’s energies, ionization potential, electronic affinity, intermolecular distances, photonic absorption bands, etc., parameters whose theoretical values ​​can be determined by methods of quantum chemistry.6

In fact, photons emitted by the sun, whose maximum luminous power is observed in the range of 450 to 1000 nm, are absorbed by the active layer. This absorption of photons leads to the formation of an excitons by the passage of an electron from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the donor to its lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). The electronic transfer of the LUMO from the donor to the LUMO of the acceptor is all the more likely as the energy difference between these two levels is great. This energy difference must be greater than 0.4 eV for dissociation to take place. In addition, the transfer of the LUMO from the donor to the LUMO of the acceptor must be faster than the recombination process. To avoid electronic transfer accompanied by a hole transfer from the donor to the acceptor, the HOMO level of the donor must also be higher than that of the acceptor so that the energy barrier is impassable by the hole. The transfer of charge to the Donor-Acceptor interface (D/A) is in competition with excitons recombination; only the excitons generated at a distance sufficiently close to the interface can reach the interface and be dissociated there before recombining. The critical distance is of the order of the diffusion length of the excitons (a few nanometers).1-5

The obtaining in 1977 of polyacetylene having a conductivity of the order of 103 S / cm, by doping (with Br2, I2 or AsF5), triggered a real craze for this material. However, this has a low environmental and thermal stability limiting its technical use. As a result of these observations, many conjugated aromatic polymers have been studied such as poly (para-phenylene) (PPP), Polythiophene (PT)...,. Polypyrrole.

In order to improve the mechanical and conductive properties of the polymers, filler can be introduced into the structure of the semiconductor polymer by a so-called doping process. This process consists of an oxidation-reduction reaction by introducing impurities (doping type n) or acceptor (p-type doping) in the material and is mainly carried out chemically or electrochemically. It is, however, important to note that unlike conductive polymers, semiconductors do not always have reversible and easily controllable doping. In the case of chemical doping, for example, for p-type (or n-type) doping, the neutral conjugated polymer is converted into a poly (cation) (or poly (anion)) by the action of an oxidant or reducing). At the same time, a counter ion is associated with it in order to maintain the overall electro-neutrality of the system, as illustrated in the following examples:

*P-type doping:

( πpolymère ) n + 3/2 ny( I 2 )   [ ( πpolymère ) +y ( I 3 ) y ] n MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqbaoaabmaake aajugibabaaaaaaaaapeGaeqiWdaNaeyOeI0IaamiCaiaad+gacaWG SbGaamyEaiaad2gacaWGOdGaamOCaiaadwgaaOWdaiaawIcacaGLPa aajuaGdaWgaaqcbasaaKqzadWdbiaad6gaaSWdaeqaaKqzGeWdbiab gUcaRiaabccacaaIZaGaai4laiaaikdacaqGGaGaamOBaiaadMhaju aGpaWaaeWaaOqaaKqzGeWdbiaadMeajuaGpaWaaSbaaKqaGeaajugW a8qacaaIYaaal8aabeaaaOGaayjkaiaawMcaaKqzGeWdbiaabccacq GHsgIRcaqGGaqcfa4damaadmaakeaajuaGdaqadaGcbaqcLbsapeGa eqiWdaNaeyOeI0IaamiCaiaad+gacaWGSbGaamyEaiaad2gacaWGOd GaamOCaiaadwgaaOWdaiaawIcacaGLPaaajuaGdaahaaWcbeqcbasa aKqzadWdbiabgUcaRiaadMhaaaqcfa4damaabmaakeaajugib8qaca WGjbqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaaG4maaWcpaqabaqcfa4a aWbaaSqabKqaGeaajugWa8qacqGHsislaaaak8aacaGLOaGaayzkaa qcfa4aaSbaaKqaGeaajugWa8qacaWG5baal8aabeaaaOGaay5waiaa w2faaKqbaoaaBaaajeaibaqcLbmapeGaamOBaaWcpaqabaaaaa@7C6A@

*Dopage de type n:

( πpolymère ) n +  [ N a + ( C 10 H 8 ) ] y   [ ( N a + ) y ( πpolymère ) y ] n +  ( C 10 H 8 ) 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqbaoaabmaake aajugibabaaaaaaaaapeGaeqiWdaNaeyOeI0IaamiCaiaad+gacaWG SbGaamyEaiaad2gacaWGOdGaamOCaiaadwgaaOWdaiaawIcacaGLPa aajuaGdaWgaaqcbasaaKqzadWdbiaad6gaaSWdaeqaaKqzGeWdbiab gUcaRiaabccajuaGpaWaamWaaOqaaKqzGeWdbiaad6eacaWGHbqcfa 4damaaCaaaleqajeaibaqcLbmapeGaey4kaScaaKqba+aadaqadaGc baqcLbsapeGaam4qaKqba+aadaWgaaqcbasaaKqzadWdbiaaigdaca aIWaaal8aabeaajugib8qacaWGibqcfa4damaaBaaajeaibaqcLbma peGaaGioaaWcpaqabaaakiaawIcacaGLPaaajuaGdaahaaWcbeqcba saaKqzadWdbiabgkHiTiaackciaaaak8aacaGLBbGaayzxaaqcfa4a aSbaaKqaGeaajugWa8qacaWG5baal8aabeaajugib8qacqGHsgIRca qGGaqcfa4damaadmaakeaajuaGdaqadaGcbaqcLbsapeGaamOtaiaa dggajuaGpaWaaWbaaSqabKqaGeaajugWa8qacqGHRaWkaaaak8aaca GLOaGaayzkaaqcfa4aaSbaaKqaGeaajugWa8qacaWG5baal8aabeaa juaGdaqadaGcbaqcLbsapeGaeqiWdaNaeyOeI0IaamiCaiaad+gaca WGSbGaamyEaiaad2gacaWGOdGaamOCaiaadwgaaOWdaiaawIcacaGL PaaajuaGdaahaaWcbeqcbasaaKqzadWdbiabgkHiTiaadMhaaaaak8 aacaGLBbGaayzxaaqcfa4aaSbaaKqaGeaajugWa8qacaWGUbaal8aa beaajugib8qacqGHRaWkcaqGGaqcfa4damaabmaakeaajugib8qaca WGdbWcpaWaaSbaaKqaGeaajugWa8qacaaIXaGaaGimaaqcbaYdaeqa aKqzGeWdbiaadIeajuaGpaWaaSbaaKqaGeaajugWa8qacaaI4aaal8 aabeaaaOGaayjkaiaawMcaaKqbaoaaCaaaleqajeaibaqcLbmapeGa aGimaaaaaaa@99A9@ .4

The introduction of charges during the doping process, locally modifies the alternation of the single and double bonds, thus positioning the charge carriers on the chain. In the forbidden band some new electronic states appeared and located with holes (radical cations) or electrons. The quasi-particles thus formed can be classified into two categories: solitons on the one hand, polarons and bi polarons on the other hand.

-When a double bond breaks (rupture of a π bond), it can give rise to two radicals called solitons and anti-solitons which can move away from each other by alternation of the links giving two independent solitons on the chain. This process of creating solitons/anti-solitons pairs is thermally activated and facilitated by defects on the polymer chain. Solitons create boundaries between phases A and B of the same energy but different by the configuration of the links alternation (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Solitons formation mechanism.

-A conjugated polymer may interact with an electron acceptor compound (A), which may result in electron transfer of the polymer to the acceptor. The obtained species is a polymer having a positive charge on the chain, with, in the vicinity, a counter-anion (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Formation of a positive polarons.

The alternation between double and single links is locally scrambled. The cationic radical so corresponds to a defect delocalized on several carbon atoms. This deformation stabilizes the charge since it accompanies it in its movement. The moving species made up of the charge-deformation set is called positive polarons. The conjugated polymer may interact with an electron donor compound (D), which may result in an electron transfer from the donor to the polymer. The obtained species is a polymer having a negative charge on the chain, with, in the vicinity, a counter cation. The negatively charged moving species is called the negative polarons. If we remove (or add) a second electron to the existing polarons, a new species can be created: it is a bipolarons; bipolarons is a di cation or dianion. The bipolarons has a null spin.

The installed capacity of the global photovoltaic fleet increased six-fold between the end of 2010 (50 GW) and the end of 2016 (305 GW).6 In recent years there has been a renewed interest in the field of organic photovoltaic converters. Research efforts have been multiplied, supported by budgets from a few industries and development of renewable energies. Recently, yields of over 4% have been reported in publications and prototypes with about 5% were manufactured for 100% organic solar cells. These progress suggests that future commercialization of these devices can be envisaged.7 The present study has examined the theoretical study of the photovoltaic characters of polyacetylene PA, of general formula

( CH = CH ) n MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqbaoaabmaake aajugibabaaaaaaaaapeGaeyOeI0Iaam4qaiaadIeacaqGGaGaeyyp a0JaaeiiaiaadoeacaWGibGaeyOeI0cak8aacaGLOaGaayzkaaqcfa 4aaSbaaKazfa0=baqcLbmacaWGUbaajuaGbeaaaaa@4533@

(n = 1 to 5) and their halogenated and alkaline derivatives. This work has also taken into account aromatic compounds. PA is the first polymers whose conducting character, after doping, was highlighted. The substitution derivatives of these compounds may exhibit better electrical conduction capability. This study was carried out consideration the energy gaps between the LUMO and the HOMO of the molecules involved in this work and confirmed the experimental results known in the literature. After comparing the differences between the LUMO of the molecules, it has been proposed to use photovoltaic "donor-acceptor" combinations based on anthracene and polyacetylene. The present studies were carried out theoretically by adopting the DFT / B3LYP density functional method, one of the most widely used methods in quantum computations of the matter structure.

Materials and methods

In the present work the calculations were carried out by the DFT method with the functional B3LYP. The main aim of the DFT is to replace the multi-electron wave function by the electronic density. While the multi electronic wave function depends on 3N variables (where N is the total number of particles in the system), density is only a function of three variables; it is therefore an easier quantity to treat both mathematically and conceptually. The principle of DFT consists of a reformulation of a N-body problem into a single-body problem, or, two-body problem if one considers the spin. The central idea of ​​DFT is that the electron density of the fundamental state of the system determines the average values ​​of observables, such as energy.8,9 The functional B3LYP is the most used by chemists. This signifies that the exchange energy is calculated by the Becke method with three parameters and the correlation by the method of1-18 Lee et al.11

The calculations were performed by the DFT/B3LYP method in the 6-31g+(d,p) orbital basis. The Gaussian program in its versions 98, 03 and 0912 was used to perform these calculations on the HPL1908w, Samsung Intel® Core i3-3110 CPU and Dell computers. The molecular representations were carried out using the Gauss View 3.09 software, the graphs by the Excel 2007 software.

Results and discussion

The first part of our calculations was devoted to the study of the conductivity of PA and their derivatives. Table 1 summarizes the energy parameters related to the photoconductivity of the molecules.

Polyacetylenes

Halogenated Derivatives

Molecule

LUMO (u.a.)

HOMO (u.a.)

Gap (u.a.)

Gap (eV)

Nom de la molécule

LUMO (u.a.)

HOMO (u.a.)

Gap (u.a.)

Gap (eV)

Ethylene

-0.00

-0.278

0,268

7,313

Fluoro Ethylene

-0.008

-0.277

0,269

7,322

952

27

75

34

45

11

Butadiene

-0.041

-0.24

0,198

5,412

Chloro Ethylene

-0.022

-0.271

0,248

6,754

48

37

89

91

12

21

Hexatriene

-0.06

-0.22

0,160

4,366

Bromo Ethylene

-0.025

-0.264

0,239

6,504

05

51

46

48

51

03

Octatetrene

-0.067

-0.21

0,143

3,91

00

67

67

Decapentene

-0.08

-0.199

0,119

3,26

Fluoro Butadiene

-0.043

-0.241

0,197

5,382

01

79

78

69

48

79

Pentabromo acetylene

-0.11

-0.22

0,11

2,994

Chloro Butadiene

-0.05

-0.24

0,190

5,177

086

090

004

21(A)

65

91

26

Bromo Butadiene

-0.054

-0.240

0,186

5,073

27

70

43

Lithium Ethylene

-0.049

-0.191

0,142

3,874

Lithium Butadiene

-0.052

-0.194

0,142

3,870

45

83

38

3

4

28

24

Sodium Ethylene

-0.062

-0.177

0,115

3,134

Sodium Butadiene

-0.064

-0.189

0,125

3,405

34

53

19

38

52

14

Potassium Ethylene

-0.056

-0.149

0,092

2,528

Potassium Butadiene

-0.058

-0.162

0,104

2,832

40

33

93

7

44

52

8

Benzene

-0.015

-0.257

0,242

6,589

Hexatriene Dop Br-

0.113

0.008

0,105

2,86

47

62

15

31

21

1

Biphenyle

-0.039

-0.233

0,193

5,272

Tribromo Acetylene

-0.08

-0.235

0,14

4,028

73

46

73

739

42

803

Naphtalene

-0,049

-0,223

0,174

4,735

Tribromo Acetylene Dop Br

-0.128

-0.21

0,08

2,38

63

64

1

78

641

763

Anthracene

-0,072

-0,202

0,130

3,54

Tribromo Acetylene Dop K

-0.11

-0.12

0,013

0,37

70

78

08

(D)

76

434

58

Table 1 Energy parameters related to the photoconductivity of some conjugated organic molecules

The analysis of the HOMO to LUMO gaps in the polyacetylene series shows that the value of this quantity decreases as the carbon chain lengthens. It varies from 7,313 to 3,259 eV. This confirms the fact that delocalization increases with the number of conjugations, which increases the conductivity of the material1-5 in fact the passage from the HOMO to the LUMO is facilitated when the energy barrier to be crossed is weak. The calculated values ​​of the energy gaps correspond to the ultraviolet and visible domains as has been discovered experimentally. This UV-visible absorption property justifies the use of polyacetylene (PA) as photovoltaic materials.

In the search for substituent’s capable of improving the conductivity of polyacetylene, the present work has been interested in studying the influence of halogens on the one hand and alkalies on the other (two families of the most active chemical elements) on the conductivity of organic materials. Examining the results in Table 1, it can be seen that the improvement in conduction of the PA material increases markedly from fluorine to iodine as a substituent. This may be explained by the fact that the peripheral free electron orbital’s p of the halogens are increasingly energies from F to I; the capacity of these orbital’s to enter into conjugation with the neighboring π bonds is then reinforced from light halogens to heavy halogens. The same tendency is observed from the alkali metal of the first period of the classification table (lithium) to that of the third period (potassium). The finding in the case of alkalies is explained by the fact that the number of empty orbitals (i.e. the number of holes) increases from Li to K, and certainly beyond; the holes facilitate the delocalization of the π electrons of the PAs and, moreover, that of the conjugated bonds of the other organic polymers with conjugated double bonds.

Table 1, showing the energetic values ​​of LUMO and HOMO of benzene, biphenyl, naphthalene and anthracene (gaps = 6.589, 5.272, 4.735 and 3.54 eV respectively) also showed that the conjugation increases when, increases the number of aromatic rings, which means that the conjugation increases with the number of conjugated π bonds.

Following these observations, it appeared that the brominated polymers, in this case the poly (monobromo) acetylenes, must exhibit interesting electronic conduction properties. We have therefore studied pentabromoacetylene (PBA) of formula

C H 2 = CBrCH = CBrCH = CBrHCH = CBrCH = CHBr MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGdbGaamisaKqba+aadaWgaaWcbaqcLbsapeGaaGOmaaWc paqabaqcLbsapeGaeyypa0JaaeiiaiaadoeacaWGcbGaamOCaiabgk HiTiaadoeacaWGibGaaeiiaiabg2da9iaabccacaWGdbGaamOqaiaa dkhacqGHsislcaWGdbGaamisaiaabccacqGH9aqpcaqGGaGaam4qai aadkeacaWGYbGaamisaiabgkHiTiaadoeacaWGibGaaeiiaiabg2da 9iaabccacaWGdbGaamOqaiaadkhacqGHsislcaWGdbGaamisaiaabc cacqGH9aqpcaqGGaGaam4qaiaadIeacaWGcbGaamOCaaaa@5E25@

brominated derivative of decapentaene

C H 2 = CHCH = CH = C H 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVCI8FfYJH8YrFfeuY=Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbb a9q8WqFfeaY=biLkVcLq=JHqpepeea0=as0Fb9pgeaYRXxe9vr0=vr 0=vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaKqzGeaeaaaaaa aaa8qacaWGdbGaamisaKqba+aadaWgaaqcbasaaKqzadWdbiaaikda aSWdaeqaaKqzGeWdbiabg2da9iaabccacaWGdbGaamisaiabgkHiTi aadoeacaWGibGaaeiiaiabg2da9iaabccacqGHsislcaWGdbGaamis aiaabccacqGH9aqpcaqGGaGaam4qaiaadIeajuaGpaWaaSbaaKqaGe aajugWa8qacaaIYaaal8aabeaaaaa@4D35@

It was found that the introduction of the five bromine atoms had a bathochromic effect since the energy gap increased from 3.26 (for decapentaene) to 2.994 eV (for PBA). The gap being reduced the conduction of the material would be improved. In order to propose a combination of materials which can serve as an active layer in a photovoltaic cell, the values ​​of different energies taking into account in the electrical conductivity of the materials were compared. From this comparison it appeared that the combination Anthracene / PBA would be indicated as a photovoltaic active layer (Figure 3) (Figure 4).

Figure 3 Molecule de pentabromoacetylene.
Figure 4 Molecule d’anthracène.

Indeed the difference LUMOAnthracene -LUMOPentabromoacetylene was found to equal 1.038 eV; this value is much greater than the threshold value (0.4 eV)1 favorable to the dissociation of the excitons. In the Anthracene / PBA mixture, anthracene will serve as donor and acceptor PBA since the energy of LUMOAnthracene (-0.07270 hartree is -1.978eV) is greater than the energy of LUMOPentabromoacetylene (-0, 11086 hartree or -3.017 eV).

The recombination of excitons is not possible since the energy of HOMO Anthracene (-0, 20278 hartree or -5,518 eV) is higher than that of HOMOPentabromo acetylene (-0.22090 hartree or -6,011 eV) (Figure 5). The material (s) to be introduced into a solar cell must be doped. Bromine being the best of the electronic acceptors tested in the present work and potassium the best donor, a Br or K atom was introduced into a polyacetylene molecule in order to evaluate the improvement in PBA conductivity by doping. The choice is made for tri (bromoacetylene). Figure 6 illustrates the doping of the tri (bromoacetylene) by bromine and potassium respectively. Tri (bromoacetylene) is certainly the simplest molecule on which this quantochemical test is possible; an extrapolation can then be made on the most complicated molecules. The lengths of the CC bonds of tri (bromoacetylene) and of its doped forms are given in Table 2.

Tri (Bromoacetylene)

Tri(Bromoacetylene) Doped by Br

Tri(Bromoacetylene) Doped by K

C1C3

1.338Å (double)

1.371Å

1.357Å

C3C5

1.46Å (single)

1.400Å

1.41Å

C5C6

1.354Å (double)

1.478Å

1.395Å

C6C8

1.452Å (single)

1.505Å

1.398Å

C8C9

1.346Å (double)

1.335Å

1.378Å

Table 2 Lenghts of the CC bonds of tri (bromoacetylene) and of its doped forms

Figure 5 Mechanism of creation and dissociation of an excitons: the electron represented in dotted line passes from the HOMO of D to its LUMO (arrow a), then jumps on the LUMO of A (arrow b).

Figure 6 Doping of the tri (bromoacetylene) respectively by bromine and potassium.

On reading this table it can be seen that, in the case of bromine doping, the single and double bonds of the carbon chain have passed to intermediate lengths. This suggests that doping has enhanced electronic delocalisation in the molecule; which would lead to an elevation of the conduction of the organic material. The same conclusion is practically reached when considering potassium doping. The carbon atoms of tri (bromoacetylene) and its doped forms were analyzed. Their values ​​are shown in Table 3.

Tri (Bromoacetylene)

Tri (Bromoacetylene) Dopé Par le Br

Tri (Bromoacetylene) Dopé par le K

C1

-0,135 ua

-0,185 ua

-0,311 ua

C3

-0,212 ua

-0,140 ua

-0,055 ua

C5

0,767 ua

0,253 ua

0,204 ua

C6

-0,989 ua

-0,405 ua

-0,715 ua

C8

0,253 ua

0,326 ua

0,0516 ua

C9

-0,312 ua

-0,569 ua

-0,538 ua

Table 3 Mulliken charges of tri (bromoacetylene) carbon atoms and its doped forms

From the analysis of Table 3, it appears that the bromine atom has captured one of the π C5C6 electrons; in fact, C6 was visibly depleted in electron (its charge varied from -0.989 ua to -0.405 ua) while C5 was enriched in electron (its charge having risen from 0.767 to 0.253 ua). The hole which appeared at C6 delocalized on both sides of C6 in accordance with the experimental observations of the literature.1,2 The same pattern occurs in the case of potassium doping with the difference that in this case the doping agent has rather yielded an electron to the organic material, thus causing an electronic surplus instead of a defect at the level of this material. These doping operations can be illustrated as in Figure 7. The doping thus causes a local jamming of the alternation between double and single bonds 1,2 in the polymers of conjugated organic compounds.

Figure 7 Doping reactions of the tri (bromoacetylene).

Table 4 presents energy parameters characteristic of the photoelectronic conduction of organic molecules. Table 5 provides information on the UV-Visible absorption domains of the two materials proposed, in the present work, to constitute the active phase of a photovoltaic cell; these are anthracene and pentabromoacetylene. It is interesting to note that Br and K are good doping agents. With bromine, P doping is carried out while N-type doping is observed with potassium. Doping with potassium is more than six times better with doping by bromine; The doping thus causes a local jamming of the alternation between double and single bonds1,2 in the polymers of conjugated organic compounds.

Polyethylenes

Molecule

LUMO (u.a.)

HOMO (u.a.)

Gap (u.a.)

Gap (eV)

Hexatriene

-0.060

-0.220

0,160

4,36

Tribromoacetylene

-0.087

-0.235

0,148

4,028

Tribromoacetylene doped by Br

-0.128

-0.216

0,088

2,38

Tribromoacetylene doped by K

-0.110

-0.124

0,013

0,37

Table 4 Photoelectronic conduction characteristics of test molecules

Molecule

Electronic Transition

Wave Length (nm)

Energy (eV)

Anthracene

47 → 48

385.96

3.2124

47 →49

322.41

3.8455

47 → 50

276.07

4.4910

Pentabromoacetylene

121→122

402.28

3.0820

120 →122

383.49

3.2330

119 →122

345.96

3.5838

Table 5 UV-Visible absorption domains of anthracene and pentabromoacetylene

In fact potassium causes the passage of the tribromoacetylene gap from 4.02 to 0.37 eV while bromine passes this gap from 4.02 to 2.38 eV. From this observation it can be deduced that bromine and potassium can be used to pentabromoacetylene; this material can be proposed to make an anthracene/pentabromoacetylene photovoltaic cell. If necessary, the bromine will serve to the pentabromoacetylene in order to increase the holes in this material and, consequently, to reinforce its "electron acceptor" capacity; at the same time anthracene can be doped with potassium, which will increase the number of free moving electrons and, consequently, will enhance the "electron donor" capacity of this aromatic compound.

Conclusion

By the DFT method a study of photosensitive organic materials was carried out. As a result,

  1. The electrical conduction of organic materials is promoted by the presence of conjugated double bonds in the organic molecule; this conduction is all the more marked as the number of conjugated links increases, which is reflected by the decrease in the HOMO-LUMO gap when increasing this number in a given series.
  2. The fact that these molecules absorb in the UV-visible range of the solar electromagnetic spectrum, as evidenced by the HOMO-LUMO gap values, justifies their use in photovoltaic cells.
  3. Potassium and bromine can be used to photosensitive organic materials: potassium for type N doping, bromine for P-type doping.
  4. A mixture of penta (bromoacetylene) doped with bromine and anthracene can serve as a photosensitive layer in a photovoltaic cell.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Richard F. Conception, synthèse et caractérisation de polymères à blocs bâtonnet-pelote en vue d’applications photovoltaïques: de la macromolécule au dispositif. Strasbourg, France: ABES; 2008. p. 34–52.
  2. Leliège A, Grolleau J, Allain M, et al. Small D–π–A systems with o-phenylene-bridged accepting units as active materials for organic photovoltaics. A European Journal. 2013;19(30):9948–9960.
  3. Yinhua Z, Canek F, Talha M Kh, et al. Recyclable organic solar cells on cellulose nanocrystal substrates. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1536.
  4. De Cuendias A. Copolymères à blocs constitués d’un bloc rigide conjugué: synthèse et auto-assemblage en solution. Thèse de doctorat, Bordeaux, France: Université ; 2017. p. 6–58.
  5. Monestier F. Amélioration de l'absorption photonique dans les cellules photovoltaïques organiques. Thèse de doctorat, France: Université Paul Cezanne Aix-Marseille III ; 2008. p. 35–40.
  6. Kamino BA, Mills B, Reali C, et al. Liquid triarylamines: the scope and limitations of piers–rubinsztajn conditions for obtaining triarylamine–siloxane hybrid materials. J Org Chem. 2012;77(4):1663–1674.
  7. Merad Boudia MR. Confinement Effect on the Dewetting of Polymer Thin Films. Doctoral thesis, University Abou Bekr Belkaid (Tlemcen, Algeria); 2012.
  8. Mathew Clark. Introduction to theoretical organic chemistry and molecular modeling. William B Smith. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1997;37(3):625.
  9. Chaquin P. Manuel de chimie théorique. Application à la structure et à la réactivité en chimie moléculaire. France: Ellipses; 2000. 189 p.  
  10. Becke AD. Density functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:5648.  
  11. Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B. 1980;37:785.
  12. Nadjia L. Thèse de doctorat es-sciences. Algérie: Université de Bartna; 2009.
  13. Frisch MJ. Gaussian 98W. Pittsbourgh PA, USA: Gaussian Inc; 1998.
  14. Hehre WJ, Radom L, S Chleyer PVR, et al. Ab initio molecular orbital theory. JCC. 1986;7(3):379.
  15. C haquin T. Pratique de la chimie Théorique, Inter Editions ; 1995.
  16. Melius CF, Goddard WA. Phys Rev A. 1974;10:1528–1540.
  17. Kahn LR, Baybutt P, Truhlar DG. J Chem Phys. 1976;65:3826–3853.
  18. Becke AD. Density‐functional thermo chemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys. 1993;98(7):5648–5652.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Amah. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.