Research Article Volume 10 Issue 2
1Chair person/Assiociate Professor, Physiotherapy, Director of Cyprus Musculoskeletal and Sports Trauma Research Centre (CYMUSTR EC), Cyprus
2Assistant Professor, Biostatistics, Co-ordinator Master in Public Health, Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, Cyprus
Correspondence: Demetris Lamnisos, Assistant Professor, Biostatistics, Co-ordinator Master in Public Health, Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, [a] 6, Diogenes Str. Engomi, PO Box 22006, 1516, Nicosia, Cyprus
Received: February 27, 2018 | Published: April 19, 2018
Citation: Evangelos NPT, Anorthosis PT, Dimitrios S, et al. Treatment of chronic patellar tendinopathy using an exercise program consisting of eccentric training and static stretching exercises combined with high intensity light therapy. A pilot study. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol. 2018;10(2):157-161. DOI: 10.15406/mojor.2018.10.00405
The aim of the present pilot trial was to investigate the effects an exercise program consisting of eccentric training and static stretching exercises combined with High Intensity Light Therapy (HILT) in patients with Chronic Patellar tendinopathy (CPT). Eight patients who had CPT participated in the present pilot trial. They received an exercise program consisting of eccentric training and static stretching exercises combined with HILT. All patients received an exercise programme five times per week for four weeks. Patients were treated with HILT for 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks, 12 sessions in total. Pain and function were evaluated using the VISA-P score at baseline, at the end of treatment (week 4), and one month (week 8) after the end of treatment. At week 4, there was a rise in VISA-P score of about 37 units. This rise is maintained at the one month follow-up. The results suggest that the combination of an exercise program with HILT is an adequate treatment for patients with CPT. Further research to establish the relative and absolute effectiveness of such a treatment approach is needed.
Chronic Patellar Tendinopathy (CPT) is a common clinical condition that is managed by physical therapists and is common among athletes and non-athletes alike. CPT is characterized by the absence of inflammatory cells and prostaglandins and an increased presence of fibroblasts and disorganized collagen.1 Therefore, this condition is not inflammatory as originally thought but is a degenerative one. The ideal term for clinical diagnosis is patellar tendinopathy because this term refers to the painful tendon without implying the pathology.2 Jumper’s knee was the first diagnostic term used for this condition. However, this condition can occur in people who are not athletes and athletes who do not perform jumping in their sports. Thus, jumper’s knee is not an appropriate term for clinical diagnosis.3 Patellar tendonitis is also an incorrect term for clinical diagnosis because the condition is not inflammatory but is degenerative as mentioned. The best diagnostic term may be the term patellar tendinosis because this term refers to the pathology of the tendon.4
Extrinsic factors such as inappropriate footwear, sport technique, training errors, and intrinsic factors such as muscle weakness and/or inflexibility, and misalignment are the main factors that lead to CPT1. It is most commonly characterized by pain at the inferior pole of the patella; although pain can also be at the tibial attachment, in the attachment of the tendon to the superior pole of the patella as well as midsubstance pain has been reported3. The pain can be caused by performing a functional activity such as squat or hop.5
However, no ideal treatment has emerged for the management of CPT. Many clinicians advocates a conservative approach5 and physiotherapy is usually recommended.4 A wide array of physiotherapy treatments has been recommended for the management of CPT such as electrotherapeutic/physical modalities, exercise programmes, soft tissue manipulation, and manual techniques.1 These treatments have different theoretical mechanisms of action, but all have the same aim, to reduce pain and improve function. Such a variety of treatment options suggests that the optimal treatment strategy is not known, and more research is needed to discover the most effective treatment in patients with CPT.
One of the most common physiotherapy treatments for CPT is exercise. Eccentric exercise has shown good clinical results in CPT6 as well as in conditions similar to CPT in clinical behaviour and histopathological appearance, such as lateral elbow,7 rotator cuff8 and Achilles tendinopathy.6 Tightness of hamstring and quadriceps has been found in patients with patellar tendinopathy as an aetiological factor.9 Eccentric training of patellar tendon and static stretching exercises of quadriceps and hamstrings was an effective treatment approach in CPT.2
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is the form of light therapy that is usually recommended as a supplement to the exercise program in the management of tendinopathies.10 More recently, physiotherapists have been able to use a new modality of light therapy for the management of tendinopathies, one known as High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT). In HILT an Nd: YAG laser is employed. The laser has a wavelength of 1064nm which causes minor and slow light absorption by chromophores and deliver radiation non-invasively to deep tissue to ensure treatment efficacy11. In addition, to having a higher power than low intensity lasers, laser used in HILT have a shorter laser emission time and a longer laser emission interval (low duty cycle). Therefore, a large amount of laser irradiation can be delivered to deep tissues.12
To our knowledge, there have been no studies to investigate the effectiveness of HILT as a supplement to an exercise program consisting of eccentric training and static stretching exercises in the management of tendinopathies. Therefore, the aim of the present pilot trial was to investigate the effects an exercise program consisting of eccentric training and static stretching exercises and HILT in patients with CPT.
Subjects
The VISA-P questionnaire was used to monitor the pain and function of patients. The instrument is a simple questionnaire, consisted of eight questions that takes less than five minutes to complete and once patients are familiar with it they will be able to complete most of it themselves. It is a valid and reliable outcome measure for patients with patellar tendinopathy.16
Reasons for patient dropout were categorized as follows: (1) withdrawal without reason, (2) not returned for follow-up, and (3) request for an alternative treatment.
The technical characteristics of the HILT device (Figure 1) used in the present trial are presented in the Table 1. Two treatment protocols were used, one for analgesic effect and one for biostimulation effect (Table 2). The total area of HILT treatment was 25cm2 according to the manufactures’ instructions. HILT was applied to the most painful areas, firstly in a circular motion from the center toward the outside (analgesic effect) and secondly in a linear motion at the pain inflicting region (bio-stimulation effect).
Total Output |
12W, Continuous Mode |
Operating wavelength |
1066 nm |
Mode of operation |
Continuous, Pulsed, Single pulse |
Number of protocols |
38 |
Safety Features |
Emergency off switch Operation by footswitch Safety Interlock |
Dimensions |
320 X 190 X 280 mm |
Mains supply |
230V150-60H'z, 115V/50-60Hz |
Laser class |
IV |
Equipment protection class |
IIB |
Table 1 Characteristics of HILT device
|
Analgesic |
Biostimulation |
Power (W) |
9 |
5 |
Dose (J/cm2) |
11 |
110 |
Treatment area (cm2) |
25 |
25 |
Total Energy (J) |
275 |
2750 |
Treatment period (min) |
2:02 |
9:10 |
Table 2 HILT protocol, analgesic and biostimulation effect
Two investigators were involved in the study: (1) the primary investigator who administered the treatments (EN); and (2) a lecturer (DS) who evaluated the patients to confirm the patellar tendinopathy diagnosis and performed all baseline and follow-up assessments, and gained informed consent. All assessments were conducted by DS who was blind to the patients’ therapy group. DS interviewed each patient to ascertain baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including patient name, sex, and age, duration of symptoms, previous treatment, occupation, affected leg and dominant leg.
All patients received a written explanation of the trial before entry into the study and then gave signed consent to participate. The study was approved by the Cyprus Research Ethics Committee (EEBK/EΠ/2016/05) and access to patients was authorized by the manager of the clinic (EN).
All patients were instructed to use their knee during the course of the study but to avoid activities that irritated the joint such as jumping, hopping and running. They were also told to refrain from taking anti-inflammatory drugs throughout the course of study. Patient compliance with this request was monitored using a treatment diary.
Communication and interaction (verbal and non-verbal) between the therapist and patient was kept to a minimum, and behaviors sometimes used by therapists to facilitate positive treatment outcomes were purposefully avoided. For example, patients were given no indication of the potentially beneficial effects of the treatments or any feedback on their performance in the pre-application and post-application measurements.17
Patients were treated with HILT as described above for 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks, 12 sessions in total. As eccentric exercises, participants carried out three sets of 15 repetitions of unilateral squat on a 250 decline board. The squat was performed at a slow speed at every treatment session. The patients counted to 30 during the squat.15 As they moved from the standing to the squat position, the quadriceps muscle and patellar tendon by inference were loaded eccentrically; no following concentric loading was done, as the non-injured leg was used to get back to the start position. At the beginning, the load consisted of the body weight and participants were standing with all their body weight on the injured leg. Subjects were told to go ahead with the exercise even if they experienced mild pain. However, they were told to stop the exercise if the pain became disabling. When the squat was pain-free the load was increased by holding weights in their hands. Between each set there was a two-minute rest. Static stretching exercises of quadriceps and hamstrings were performed as described by Jensen & Di Fabio18 before and after the eccentric training.19 Each stretch lasted 30seconds and there was a one minute rest between each stretch. Each training session was to be completed once daily, five times per week, for four weeks and was individualized on the basis of the patient’s description of pain experienced during the procedure.18
Pain, function and dropout rate were measured in the present pilot trial. Each patient was evaluated at baseline (week 0), at the end of treatment (week 4) and one month (week 8) after the end of treatment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Fourteen patients eligible for inclusion visited the clinic within the trial period. Five did not meet the inclusion criteria described above. The other 9 patients were received the recommended treatment, an eccentric exercise program and HILT. There were 7 men and 2 women. The mean age (SD) of the sample was 30.90 (13.05) years and the duration of patellar tendinopathy were 5.573 months. Patellar tendinopathy was in the dominant leg in all patients.
The VISA-P was 56.67(22.14) at week 0 (Table 3). At week 4, there was a rise in VISA score of about 37 units (Table 4). VISA P was 93.67 at week 8 (Table 3).
|
Week 0 |
Week 4 |
Week 8 |
Eccentric training static stretching and HILT |
56.67 (22.14) |
94.00 (10.39) |
93.67 (10.97) |
Table 3 VISA-P score before each evaluation
Values are means (SD).
|
Eccentric training static stretching and HILT |
Week 4 |
37.33 (17.78) |
Week 8 |
37.00 (17.69) |
Table 4 Change in VISA-P score
Values are means (SD)
The present pilot study examined the effect of an exercise program consisting of eccentric training and static stretching exercises combined with HILT in the management of CPT. The findings of the present pilot trial have demonstrated significant improvements in terms of pain and disability. The results obtained from this pilot study are novel; as to date, similar studies have not been conducted.
Alfredson et al.20 first proposed the eccentric training of the injured tendon. It is the most commonly used conservative approach in the treatment of tendinopathy. Malliaras et al.3 concluded that clinicians should consider eccentric-concentric loading alongside or instead of eccentric loading in Achilles and patellar tendinopathy. A Heavy Slow Resistance (HSR) program is recommended in the management of lower limb tendinopathy.21,22 The HSR program was produced equivalent pain and function improvement (VISA) than the Alfredson eccentric program, but significantly better patient satisfaction at six month follow–up. In the Achilles tendon, eccentric and HSR have recently been shown to yield similar clinical outcomes (VISA and patient satisfaction) at 1 year follow up. Based on the above findings, the HSR program can be recommended as an alternative to the Alfredson eccentric program lower limb tendinopathy rehabilitation.
Recently, isometric exercises have been recommended to reduce and manage tendon pain increasing the strength at the angle of contraction without producing inflammatory signs.3,23 Five repetitions of 45-second isometric mid-range quadriceps exercise at 70% of maximal voluntary contraction have been shown to reduce patellar tendon pain for 45 minutes post exercise and this was also associated with a reduction in motor cortex inhibition of the quadriceps that was associated with patellar tendinopathy.23 The dosage of isometric contractions was based on clinical experience3,23,24 and their effect on pain in patients with CPT requires further study. The ‘Spanish squat was used as isometric contraction and is useful when there is limited or no access to gym equipment as in the present situation. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the simultaneous use of these two kinds of contractions (isotonic and isometric) will further enhance the analgesic effect of contractions in the treatment of CPT, increasing the lower limb function.
A component lacking from evidence-based programs is adequate consideration of the kinetic chain. Poor lumbopelvic control has the potential to alter load distribution on the lower limb kinetic chain and increase the risk of lower limb tendinopathy.5,25 It is our belief that the improvement of lumbo-pelvic control can be achieved by performing simple exercises such as single leg bridging in supine and four point prone bridging exercises. Future research is needed to confirm this suggestion.
In addition, hip extensors weakness has been associated with patellar tendinopathy.26 Exercises to strengthen these muscle groups should be considered in exercise protocols and patellar tendinopathy. However, hip extensors were not strengthened in the present pilot trial. Functional activities such as jumping, cutting and sprinting should also be included in lower limb tendinopoathy rehabilitation programs among athletes, but have so far not been included in popular programs in the literature.26
The load of exercises was increased according to the patients symptoms otherwise the results are poor.18 Furthermore, eccentric exercises were performed at a low speed in every treatment session because this allows tissue healing.27 Ice was not recommended at the end of the treatment because research has shown that ice as a supplement to an eccentric exercise programme offers no benefit to patients with tendinopathy.28 Finally, the avoidance of painful activities is crucial for tendon healing, because training during the treatment period increases patients’ symptoms and delays tendon healing.29
Eccentric exercises appear to reduce the pain and improve function. The mechanism by which eccentric training achieves these outcomes remains uncertain, as there is a lack of good quality evidence relating to physiological effects. The clinical improvement of the HSR group was accompanied by increased collagen turnover. It is unknown if the isometric contractions can reverse the pathology of the tendinopathy and in this case the pathology of CPT. Eccentric training with or without static stretching exercises is called an exercise programme. There are two types of exercise programme: home exercise programmes and exercise programmes carried out in a clinical setting which are called supervised exercise programmes. Although a home exercise programme can be performed any time during the day without requiring supervision from a therapist, our clinical experience has shown that patients fail to comply with the regimen of home exercise programmes.30 Although many ways can be recommended to improve the compliance of patients with the home exercise programme such as phone calls, exercise monitors and better self-management education, it is believed that this problem can be solved by the supervised exercise programmes performed in a clinical setting under the supervision of a therapist. It is believed because our experience has shown that many patients stopped the home exercise programme without giving an explanation, whereas patients completed the supervised programme. One possible reason why they continue the supervised exercise programme could be the cost. In the supervised exercise programme, the patients visit the therapist more times than the home exercise programme, and this is more expensive. A future study will combine the both types of exercise programmes in order to maximize the compliance of the patients.
Although an exercise program is an effective treatment approach in a short period of time, a supplement to the exercise program should be found to reduce the treatment period. One such modality is LLLT, and research showed that LLLT plus an exercise program may be a better treatment approach than an exercise program alone for the management of LET31 and Achilles tendinopathy32 LLLT is a treatment that has been used for 26years in clinical practice33 for conditions such as tendinopathies, and it has been shown to have potential to modulate the degenerative process. As mentioned above, these tendon conditions are degenerative processes and not inflammatory. In addition, the biostimulatory effects of LLLT have been shown to reduce cell apoptosis34 and promote collagen fiber synthesis within a low-range therapeutic window of 0.4–4J=cm.2,35,36
Like LLLT, HILT is also a light source, but LLLT and HILT differ in their radiation characteristics. It is claimed that HILT has biostimulative effects to accelerate cellular mechanisms and improve blood supply, but more research is needed to investigate precisely how HILT works, since there is little scientific evidence for the efficacy of HILT in musculoskeletal disorders, and absolutely no evidence of its efficacy for any other pathological condition.37 In addition, there are no guidelines on the parameters (dose, frequency, duration) of HILT.38 Finally, HILT has used in only one study in the management of tendinopathy, especially in LET with positive results.37
Even though the positive effects of such a therapeutic approach in CPT have been reported in the present pilot trial, its study design (small study population, no control, no comparison with other treatment modalities) limits the generalization of these findings. Future well-designed clinical trials are needed to confirm the positive results of this pilot study establishing the effectiveness of such an exercise program combined with HILT in the management of CPT. In addition, structural changes in the tendons related to the treatment interventions and the long-term effects (6 months or more after the end of treatment) of these treatments are needed to investigate. Further research is needed to establish the possible mechanism of action of this treatment approach, and the cost effectiveness of such treatment, because reduced cost is an important issue for the recommendation of any given treatment.
An exercise program consisting of eccentric and static stretching exercises, combined with HILTis an effective treatment approach for patients with CPT. Controlled studies are needed to establish the effects and the mechanism of action of such a treatment approach in CPT. A cost-effectiveness analysis should be incorporated into the analysis of the effectiveness of such a treatment approach in future trials.
None.
Authors declare there is no conflict in publishing the article.
©2018 Evangelos, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.