Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2374-6939

Orthopedics & Rheumatology

Proceeding Volume 8 Issue 4

Is an Effective Functional Replacement of a Lumbar Segment Possible? Biokinemetrie as a Surgical Projection

Rieger B,1,6 Jiang H,1,2 Polanski W,1 Molcanyi M,3 Zivcak J,4 Reinshagen C,5 Brautferger U,6 Mysliwiec P,1 Schackert G,1 Norbert Welsch6

1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Dresden, Germany
2Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, China
3Institute of Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Germany
4Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia
5Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA
6Prospective Spine, USA

Correspondence: Bernhard Rieger, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Dresden, Germany

Received: June 05, 2017 | Published: July 10, 2017

Citation: Rieger B, Jiang H, Polanski W, Molcanyi M, Zivcak J et al. (2017) Is an Effective Functional Replacement of a Lumbar Segment Possible? Biokinemetrie as a Surgical Projection. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol 8(4): 00321. DOI: 10.15406/mojor.2017.08.00321

Download PDF

Objective

The spine’s overall extent of movement is larger than the sum of individual movements of its facet joints. Small movements (Fig. 1) of the facet joints are added together progressively. When analyzing segmental motion patterns, all segments demonstrate the same motion characteristics but each individual segment is positioned at a different point of its individual movement-sequence at any position of the spinal column. During stabilizing operations, whether rigid or prosthetic, a fracture-like segmental release prior to instrumentation is currently the standard of care. However, as known from cases of natural fracture, unnatural movement patterns are possible which result in callus formation. Consequently, in order to create a biokinemetrically functional segmental replacement, physiological range of motion (ROM) must first be measured, followed by preoperative simulation of post-surgical conditions with adjustment to adjacent level ROM in order to prevent non-physiological segmental movement and undesired ossification.

Methods

After lumbar segmental movement characteristics of volunteers were described video-fluoroscopically, the movement of every lumbar segment was simulated. Software was used to automatically identify the worst segment, by analyzing patients spinal movements based on plain X-rays in inclination, neutral position, reclination, a.p. and oblique right/left. ROM analysis was repeated and the ROM of the best segment was projected into the worst segment in order to define the optimal height for segmental replacement regarding current degeneration (Figure 1). After software-projected optimization of segmental height, extrapolated characteristics were calculated to define placement and bearing surfaces of an interspinous device which supports the facet joints and reflects the natural segmental movement pattern (Figure 2-4).

Figure 1 Segmental movement characteristics described with small blue curves in the plain X-ray.  

Figure 2 Anterior-posterior movement characteristics described via biokinemetric triangle.

Figure 3 Lateral movement described via triangle.

Figure 4 Lateral movement patterns of the lumbar spine in order to obtain information about the most probable movement of each segment using a surrogate model based on video-fluoroscopic examinations

A: X-ray in inclination with blue curves describing the probable movement of a point on the roof of the neuroforamen B: X-ray in neutral position C: X-ray in reclination green tables with data of the biokinemetric triangles, bar diagrams illustrate the common range of motion analysis.

Results

The construction of an artificial bearing area, which is able to support the progressive movement of the facet joints, was demonstrated. A lock-move (DE102016009670.5) which results from this consideration is able to be implanted into the interspinous space using cortical bone trajectories (Figure 5C). A precursor device was implanted in a 38-year-old male patient with a follow up time of four years, who had been operated 10 times on a prolapse in L5/S1, thereby damaging the facet joints. He refused stabilization. He was supplied with a monoblock prosthesis (Figure 5A) and a facet joint support based on polyaxial screw heads, which allowed a restricted translation (Figure 5B).

Figure 5 Functional replacement. A: implantation of the lumbar prosthesis B: principle of a primitive lock-move based on polyaxial screwheads C: postoperative CT-scan showing the vectors of the screws.   

Conclusion

It is feasible to measure and conclusively simulate segmental movement patterns in order to provide mathematical-algorithmic theorems for the development of an interspinous device that restores optimal segmental height, movement characteristics and further supports the facet joints. In contrast, pedicle screw based dynamic support (topping-offs), does not allow dynamic adjustments of segmental height and therefore progressively can’t emulate natural segmental movement according to the results of the above outlined surrogate model.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Rieger, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.