Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2574-819X

Bioorganic & Organic Chemistry

Correspondence:

Received: January 01, 1970 | Published: ,

Citation: DOI:

Download PDF

Abstract

A three-step synthesis of 6-methoxy-2-tetralone, a potential intermediate for many terpenoids and steroidal compounds, has been developed.

Keywords: 6-methoxy-1-tetralone, 2,4-pentanediol, MCPBA, PTS, hydroboration-oxidation

Abbreviations

MCPBA, chloroperbenzoic acid; p-TsOH, p-toluenesulphonic acid; FT, fourier transform; MS, mass spectra; TLC, layer chromatography

Introduction

6-methoxy-2-tetralone has been selected as starting material for the synthesis of many steroidal compounds1–3 2-aminotetalin derivatives4 which exhibit antifungal activities, tetrahydro benzocycloheptane5 and many terpenoid compounds.6 6-methoxy-2-tetralone is more expensive, difficult to synthesize and unstable in comparison to 6-methoxy-1-tetralone. Therefore 6-methoxy-2-tetralone has attracted an array of impressive synthetic efforts.7–13 The draw backs of the published methods areUse of flammable material like trimethylsilyl cyanide and corrosive product like zinc iodide7

  1. Use of flammable material like trimethylsilyl cyanide and corrosive product like zinc iodide7
  2. Use of bad smelling product like ethyl mercaptied14
  3. Long steps and complicated experimental procedure.8,9

The overall yield of the most of the published procedures range from 39 to 42%. The importance of 6-methoxy 2-tetralone in organic synthesis encouraged us to develop an alternative approach of the same. The present paper describes the results of our efforts towards the synthesis of the title compound. The synthetic route is depicted in Scheme 1.

Scheme (i) 2,4-pentane diol, PTs; (ii) MCPBA, CH2Cl2; (iii) Et OH, 10% H2SO4; (iv) BF3.OEt2

Results and discussion

The commercially available 6-methoxy-1-tetralone 1 was converted15 into the olefin 2 in 94% yield by heating under reflux with 2,4-pentanediol and a catalytic amount of p-toluenesulphonic acid (p-TsOH) who’s spectroscopic properties perfectly agree with structure assigned. The olefin 2 was also previously synthesized by different routes14,16 but the yield was not high compared with the present procedure. Epoxidation of the olefin 2 was performed with m-chloroperbenzoic acid (MCPBA) in dichloromethane and without purification the resulting epoxide was heated under reflux for 3 hours with ethanolic sulfuric acid (10%) to afford the tetralone 3 in 39% yield (overall yield 36%). The reaction was attempted several times using different reaction conditions which included change of temperature, time of heating, amount of sulfuric acid etc., (Table 1) however the yield could not be further improved. The spectroscopic data (NMR and MS) lent support to the assigned structure. An attempt was made to purify the epoxides by column chromatography but could not be isolated due to tendency of decomposition as exhibited in TLC.

Time of heating

Amount of H2SO4

Changes of temperature

Yield

1.5 hours

1mL (15%)

40–45°

12%

2 hours

2mL (15%)

50–60°

18%

3 hours

3mL (25%)

60–70°

20%

3 hours

3mL (10%)

Reflux

39%

Table Brief description of conditions for experiments of compound 3

The cleavage of the crude epoxide was also tried with freshly distilled borontrifluoride etherate [(BF3.Et2O)] at room temperature. The tetralone 3 was obtained in 36% (overall yield 35%). The opening of the epoxide was also attempted with sodium cyanoborohydride and borontrifluoride etherate.17 A mixture of four products were obtained (evidenced by TLC) which on the basis of spectral data contained little if any of the desired product. In order to improve the yield, the olefin 2 was subjected to hydroboration-oxidation18 reaction. As expected a mixture of alcohols were obtained as evidenced by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Oxidation with Jones reagent18,19 followed by purification afforded the 2-tetralone in very poor yield. The tetralone, obtained in major proportion was identified as 1-tetralone 1.

Experimental

Unless otherwise stated, IR spectra were taken on a Nicolet –Fourier Transform (FT) instrument, Bruker AM 300MHz spectrometers in CDCl3 were employed for the determination of 1H and 13C NMR spectra, with deuteriochloroform as solvent. Mass spectra (MS) were determined on a Dupont 21-492B. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (Merck). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates were coated with silica gel and the spots visualized using ultraviolet light. All melting points are uncorrected and were determined on an electrothermal melting point apparatus. All organic solvents were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and solvents were evaporated in vacuo. Elemental analyses were performed on a Carlo-Erba 1108 Elemenal Analyser.

Methoxy-3,4-dihydronaphthalene (2)

To a solution of the tetralone 1 (1g; 5.7mmol) in toluene (95mL) was added p-toluenesulphonic acid (250mg, 1.45mmol) and 2, 4-pentanediol (2.42mL, 22.3 mmol) and then heated under reflux for 24 hours. Using a Dean-Stark apparatus. The reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with sodium bicarbonate solution (5%) and extracted three times with ether. The combined extracts were washed with brine, dried, evaporated and chromatographed over silica gel (eluent hexane) to obtain the dihydronaphthalene 2 as oil ( 861mg, 94%). lit. b.p 85-95° (1mm);16 m/z 161 (M+1); 1H NMR: δ7.06 (d, 1H, J=9Hz, H-7), 6.81 (m, 2H, H-5, H-8), 6.56 (d, 1H, J=10.2Hz, H-1), 6.01 (m, 1H, H-2), 3.86 (s, 3H, OMe), 2.91 (t, 2H, J=0.31Hz, J=16.8Hz, H-4), 2.41 (m, 2H, H-3); 13C NMR: δ158. 43 (C6), 136 .92 (C10), 127.15 (C9), 127.04 (C2), 126 .67 (C1), 125.57 (C8), 113.62 (C5), 110.82 (C7), 54.83 (C11), 27.84 (C4), 22.83 (C3). Anal. Calcd. for C11H12O, C,82.46; H, 7.55. Found: C, 82.68; H, 7.69.

6- Methoxy-2-tetralone (3)

First Procedure: To a suspension of MCPBA (1.5g, 8.7mmol) in dry dichloromethane (16mL), cooled in ice, was added dihydronaphthalene 2 (616mg, 3.8mmol) dissolved in dichloromethane (2mL). The reaction mixture was stirred overnight, filtered, diluted with dichloromethane, washed with a solution of sodium bicarbonate (5%), brine, dried and evaporated to obtain an oil (591mg), which without purification was dissolved in ethanol (3mL) and treated with sulfuric acid (3mL, 10%) and heated under reflux for 3 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with water and extracted three times with chloroform. The organic extracts were washed with brine, dried and evaporated to obtain an oil which on purification (eluent hexane: ether 7:3) afforded the teralone 3 (264mg, 39%); lit b.p 117-119° (0.5mm);13 m/z 177 [M++H], ʋmax 3cm-1 (C0); 1H NMR: δ7.01 (d, 1H, J=8.04Hz, H-7), 6.76 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.73 (d, 1H, J=2.72Hz, H-6), 3.79 (s, 3H, H-11), 3.51 (s, 1H, H-10), 3.01 (t, 2H, J=6.61Hz, H-3), 2.52 (t, 2H, J=6.61Hz, H -2); 13C NMR: δ2.10.91 (C-1), 1.58.51 (C-5), 137.88(C-9), 129.10 (C-7), 125.17 (C-8), 112.38 (C-6), 112.31 (C-4), 55.31 (C-11), 44.22 (C-10), 38.14 (C-2), 28.62 (C-3). Anal: Calcd for C11H12O2 C, 74.97; H, 6.86. Found: C, 75.15; H, 6.98.

Second procedure

To the oily epoxide, prepared by the above mentioned procedure, from dihydronaphthalene 2 (616mg, 3.8mmol), in dichloromethane (15mL) was added freshly distilled borontrifluoride etherate (0.7mL, 5.7mmol) at room temperature and stirred for 10min. The organic extract was separated, dried and evaporated to yield an oil which on chromatographic purification (eluent: hexane: ether 7:3) afforded the tetralone 3 (246mg, 36%) %); lit. b.p. 117-119° (0.5mm);13 whose spectroscopic data was almost identical with tetralone 3 prepared by the first procedure.

Conclusion

In conclusion a concise approach for the synthesis of 6-methoxy-2-tetralone was developed with an overall yield of 36%. We believe the present approach is a valuable addition to the known methods for the synthesis of the 6-methoxy-2-tetralone.

Acknowledgements

Financial support from our institute is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nasipuri D. A synthesis of 7–methoxy–2–oxohydrophenanthrenes. Chemistry and Industry (London). 1956:1389–1390.
  2. Meyer WL, Wolfe JF. On the Stereochemistry of Conjugate addition. II. Hydrocyanation of 1–Acetyl–Δ1,8–hydrindene1,2a. J Org Chem. 1964;29(1):170–174.
  3. Nagata W, Yoshioka M, Hirai S. Eine neue hydrocyanierungs–methode. Tetrahedron Letters. 1962;3(11):461 –466.
  4. Yao B, Ji H, Cao Y, et al. Synthesis and Antifungal activities of novel 2–Aminotetralin derivatives. J Med Chem. 2007;50(22):5293–5300.
  5. McChesney JD, Swanson RA. Preparation of a tetrahydrobenzocycloheptene and its intramolecular cyclization. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 1982;47(26):5201– 5204.
  6. Goldsmith D. The total synthesis of tri– and Tetracyclic diterpenes. Total Synthesis of Natural Products. In: ApSimon, editor. USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1992. 8:1–243.
  7. Pryde DC, Henry SS, Meyers AI. Synthesis of 2–tetralones via a novel 1, 2–carbonyl transposition of 1–tetralones. Tetrahedron Letters. 1996;37(19):3243–3246.
  8. Han YS, Devulapally R. A concise method for the synthesis of 2–tetralone by titanium tetrachloride–promoted cyclization of a 4–aryl–2–hydroxybutanal diethyl acetal. Tetrahedron Letters. 2009;50(41):5713–5715.
  9. Han YS, Devulapally R. TiCl4–promoted intramolecular cyclization of 4–methoxy–5–arylmethyl–1,3–dioxolan–2–ones:an expedient method to prepare 2–tetralones. Tetrahedron Letters. 2009;50:2831–2834.
  10. Silviera CC, Braga AL, Kaufman TS, et al. Synthetic approaches to 2–tetralones. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:8295–8328.
  11. Vebrel J, Carrié R. Synthesis of indeterminate methoxycarbonyl–3 and 4–methoxycarbonyl–1,2–dihydro–naphthalene. Obtaining β–tetralones from the corresponding α–tetralones. Bulletin of the chemical company of France. 1982.
  12. Hauser FM, Prasanna S. Ketone Transposition: 2(1H)–Tetralones from 1(2H)–Tetralones. Synthesis. 1980;1980(8):621 –623.
  13. Kidwell RL, Darling SD. A facile phenol synthesis. An improved route to 6–methoxy–2–tetralones. Tetrahedron Letters. 1966;7(5):531 –535.
  14. Radcliffe MM, Weber WP. Synthesis of ι–Methoxy–1,2–dihydronaphthalenes. Gas Phase pyrolysis of 1–(2’ –,3´–, and 4´–Methoxyphenyl)–1,3–butadienes. J Org Chem. 1977;42(2):297– 300.
  15. Vuliganda V, Lin Y, Chndraratna RA. Selective conversion of α–tetralones to dihydronaphthalenes. Tetrahedron Letters. 1996;37(12):1941–1944.
  16. Nagata W, Teresawa T. Totalsynthetische Untersuchungen a Steroiden. II. Synthese des 6–Methoxy–3, 4–dihydro–2 (1H)–naphthalinons. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 1961;9(4):267–275.
  17. Hutchins RO, Taffer IM, Burgoyne W. Regio– and Stereoselective cleavage of epoxides with cyanoborohydride and boron trifluoride etherate. J Org Chem. 1981;46(25):5214–5215.
  18. Nakano T, Banerjee AK. Studies on the potential intermediates for the synthesis of rosane type diterpenoids: Preparation of 8β–acetoxymethyl–2β–acetoxy–4aβ,8–dimethyl–1,2,3,4,4a,4bα,5,6,7,8,10,10aα–dodecahydrophenanthrene and 8β–carboxy–2β–benzoyloxy–4aβ,8–dimethyl–9–keto–trans, anti, trans–perhydrophenanthrene. Tetrahedron. 1972;28(3):471–480.
  19. Bowers A, Halsall TG, Jones ERH, et al. 520. The chemistry of the triterpenes and related compounds. Part XVIII. Elucidation of the structure of polyporenic acid C. J Chem Soc. 1953;1953:2548 –2560.
Creative Commons Attribution License

© . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.