Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2471-139X

Anatomy & Physiology

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 6

Biometric analysis of the area of the foramen magnum using the ImageJ software, and its correlation with the Radinsky and Teixeira formulas

José Aderval Aragão,1,3 Iapunira Catarina Sant’Anna Aragão,2 Felipe Matheus Sant’Anna Aragão,2 Marcos Guimarães de Souza Cunha,2 Victor Petersen Dantas Moreno,3 Victoria Rezende de Brito,3 João Vitor Santana Souza,3 Danilo Ribeiro Guerra,1 Francisco Prado Reis3

1Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Brazil
2Medical School, University Center of Volta Redonda (UNIFOA), Brazil
3Medical School of Tiradentes University (UNIT), Brazil

Correspondence: José Aderval Aragão, Federal University of Sergipe, Marechal Rondon Avenue, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil, Tel 55 79 991916767

Received: October 28, 2020 | Published: November 12, 2020

Citation: Aragão JA, Aragão JCSA, Aragão FMSA, et al. Biometric analysis of the area of the foramen magnum using the ImageJ software, and its correlation with the Radinsky and Teixeira formulas. MOJ Anat Physiol. 2020;7(6):169-171. DOI: 10.15406/mojap.2020.07.00309

Download PDF

Abstract

Introduction: The knowledge of biometrics in the area of the foramen magnum is of importance in the pathophysiology of several disorders of the craniocervical junction, as well as for anthropology, anatomy and forensic medicine. The analysis of the area using image technology is still very scarce in the literature.

Objective: Determine the area of the foramen magnum using ImageJ and correlate it with the areas calculated by the formulas of Radinsky and Teixeira.

Methodology: 104 human dry skulls of adults were studied, 62 male and 42 female, belonging to the anatomy laboratories of the Universities: Tiradentes (UNIT) and Federal de Sergipe (UFS). To calculate the area of the foramen magnum, the ImageJ software was used, while the measures, length and width, were performed using a digital caliper. The areas calculated by ImageJ were compared to those calculated using the Radinsky and Teixeira formula.

Results: The area of the foramen magnum measured by ImageJ ranged from 532.14 to 1135.79mm², with an overall average of 758.71mm². According to Radinsky's formula, the area of the foramen magnum varied from 610.35 to 1233.09mm², with an average of 828.25mm²; and in Teixeira, the area ranged from 633.67 to 1241.29mm², with an average of 840.16mm². The Cronbach's alpha correlating the three methods was equal to 0.950.

Conclusion: The calculation of the area of the foramen magnum, using the ImageJ software was significantly close to the area calculated by the formulas of Radinsky and Teixeira (Cronbach's alpha=0.950), proving to be useful for forensic practice. Sexual dismorphism can be found, varying its appearance in literature, but only in relation to its size, but not its shape. However some other authors seem to have not found any sexual dismorphism.

Keywords: sexual dimorphism, anatomy, anthropometry, foramen magnum, occipital bone, software validation, skull base, biometry, forensic medicine, ImageJ software

Abbreviations

mm², square millimeter; FMs, foramens magnus; M, male; F, female; %, percentage

Introduction

The knowledge of the biometrics of the foramen magnum (FM) is of great importance in the pathophysiology of several conditions, as well as for anthropology, anatomy and forensic medicine. According to Muthukumar et al.1 based on morphometric limits, it would be possible to report the possibility that the FM would be within a predetermined numerical variation or an anatomical malformation. In addition, the study of the FM region is important and is necessary in view of the increased transcondylar approach for ventral access of lesions at the craniocervical junction.

Smoker2 stated that the configuration and size of the FM play an important role in the pathophysiology of several diseases of the craniocervical junction. Thus, it becomes important not only for the physician who diagnoses it, but also for the surgeon who operates on this region.

Teixeira3 Günay &Altinkök4 Gruber et al.,5 Gapert et al.,6 studied the biometry of the foramen magnum for gender identification and human biological characterization and evaluated its importance in a criminal laboratory and in accidents, since this region remained unscathed due to being heavily protected by soft tissues.

Although the morphometric limits have already been detailed in some anatomical studies, the analysis of the dimensions of the foramen magnum using imaging technology is still scarce in the literature.7 Our objective was to determine the area of the foramen magnum using the ImageJ software, and to correlate it with the formulas of Radinsky8 and Teixeira3

Materials and methods

104 foramina magna of dry human skulls were analyzed, belonging to the anatomical collection of Universidade Tiradentes (UNIT) and Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS). Of that total number 62 were male, 42 were female, with ages ranging from 11 to 91 years (average of 58.69 years old). Only skulls with intact occipital region were included in the sample and determined as to sex and age.

In each skull, the area of the foramens magnum (FM) was calculated using the ImageJ software (Figure 1), and using the formulas of Radinsky8 and Teixeira3 (Figure 2). To perform the calculation with the ImageJ software, the skull bases were photographed using a digital camera attached to a static support, positioned at a standard distance of 20cm from the object. Subsequently, the photos were imported into the ImageJ software and the area of the foramen magnum was calculated.

Figure 1 Foramen magnum area using ImageJ software.

Figure 2 Radinsky and Teixeira formulas.

For the calculation using the formulas of Radinsky8 and Teixeira3 the maximum longitudinal distance - h (between the anterior and posterior margins) and the maximum transverse distance - w (between the lateral margins) of the foramen magnum, were measured using a 0.01mm precision digital caliper, and after collection, the dimensions were applied to the formulas.

Results

Determining the area of the foramen magnum using the ImageJ software, the average found was 758.71mm², using the Radinsky formula,8 the average found was 828.25mm²; and the Teixeira's3 formula was 840.16mm² (Table 1).

 

FMs areas (mm²)

   
 

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Standard deviation

ImageJ software

532.14

1135.79

758.71

±118.60

Radinsky formula8

633.67

1241.29

840.16

±110.81

Teixeira formula3

610.35

1233.09

828.25

±110.75

Table 1 Foramens magnum areas calculated using ImageJ software, and Radinsky and Teixeira formulas
mm², square millimeter; FMs, foramens magnus

Discussion

The values of the areas found by the 3 methods were statistically correlated by Cronbach's Alpha, showing significance (Cronbach's alpha=0,950).

The areas and lengths of the FMs were extensively studied. Authors such as Gabert et al.,9 Macaluso,10 Raghavendra et al.,11 Singh & Talwar12 and Kazi et al.13 performed biometric studies of the FMs, using the formulas of Radinsky8 and Teixeira3 as a model (Table 2).

   

Radinsky formula8

Teixeira formula3

Authors

Sex

FMs areas (mm²)

Teixeira3

M

-

963

 

F

-

805

Radinsky8

M

819

-

 

F

771

-

Gabert et al.6

M

862

868

 

F

801

808

Macaluso10

M

854

860

 

F

807

815

Raghavendra et al.11

M

811

821

 

F

722

727

Singh & Talwar12

M

733

741

 

F

692

699

Kazi et al.13

M

777

-

 

F

728

-

Present study

M

839

834

 

F

811

824

Table 2 The FMs areas in averages, calculated by the Radinsky and Teixeira formulas
M, male; F, female; mm², square millimeter; FMs, foramens magnus

The Radinsky8 and Teixeira3 formulas are based on the mathematical formula of a circle (A=πr², "r" being the radius). The first formula makes the product of two distinct radius (half the longest length - h - times half the longest width - w), while the second uses a single radius, corresponding to the average between the length and the width.

Many studies on the morphological types of the foramen magnum show that, in most cases, this structure does not have a round shape, making it difficult to determine a radius (Table 3). Therefore, the use of a software that delimits exactly the shape of the FM is more advantageous. In addition, with the ImageJ software, it is not necessary to measure the dimensions of each skull with the digital caliper, making this method more practical.

Authors

Types (%)

Zaidi & Dayal14

Oval (64%)

Sindel et al.15

Tetragonal (49%)

Murshed et al.16

Round (22%)

Espinoza et al.17

Oval (45%)

Chethan et al.18

Round (23%)

Radhakrishna et al.19

Oval (39%)

Aragão et al.20

Pear shaped (37%)

Table 3 Predominance of the FMs morphological types
FMs, foramens magnus; %, percentage

Conclusion

The calculation of the area of the foramen magnum using the ImageJ software showed a high correlation with the calculation of the area using the formulas of Radinsky and Teixeira (Cronbach's alpha=0.950), proving to be useful for the practice of forensic medicine.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Muthukumar N, Swaminathan R, Venkatesh G, et al. A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to the transcondylar approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;147(8):889–895.
  2. Smoker WR. Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies. Radiographics. 1994;14(2):255–277.
  3. Teixeira WR. Sex identification utilizing the size of the foramen magnum. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1982;3(3):203–206.
  4. Günay Y, Altinkök M. The value of the size of foramen magnum in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med. 2000;7(3):147–149.
  5. Gruber P, Henneberg M, Böni T, et al. Variability of human foramen magnum size. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2009;292(11):1713–1719.
  6. Gapert R, Black S, Last J. Sex determination from the occipital condyle: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009;138(4):384–394.
  7. de Oliveira E, Rhoton AL Jr, Peace D. Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the foramen magnum. Surg Neurol. 1985;24(3):293–352.
  8. Radinsky L. Relative brain size: a new measure. Science. 1967;155(3764):836–838.
  9. Gapert R, Black S, Last J. Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Int J Legal Med. 2009;123(1):25–33.
  10. Macaluso PJ. Metric sex determination from the basal region of the occipital bone in a documented french sample. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol. 2011;23:19–26.
  11. Raghavendra Babu YP, Kanchan T, Attiku Y, et al. Sex estimation from foramen magnum dimensions in an Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012;19(3):162–167.
  12. Singh G, Talwar I. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum in human skull for sex determination. Hum Bio Rev. 2013;2(1):29–41.
  13. Kazi SAK, Aadamali AN, Pramod BG. Morphometric Analysis of Foramen Magnum for Sex Determination in Karnataka. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2014;8(2):48–51.
  14. Zaidi SH, Dayal SS. Variations in the shape of foramen magnum in Indian skulls. Anat Anz. 1988;167(4):338–340.
  15. Sindel M. Özkan O, Uçar Y, et al. Anatomical variations of the foramen magnum. Akd U Tip Fak Dergisi. 1989;6(4):97–102.
  16. Murshed K, Çiçekcibasi A, Tuncer I. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci. 2003;33(5):301–306.
  17. Espinoza E, Ayala C, Ortega L, et al. Tomographic morphometry of the foramen magnum and its relationship with sex and Mapuche ethnicity.Revista Anacem. 2011;5(1):28–31.  
  18. Chethan P, Prakash KG, Murlimanju BV, et al. Morphological analysis and morphometry of the foramen magnum: an anatomical investigation. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(4):416–419.
  19. Radhakrishna SK, Shivarama CH, Ramakrishna A, et al. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum for sex determination in south Indian population. NUJHS. 2012;2(1):20–22.
  20. Aragão JA, Pereira RO, Moraes RZC, Reis FP. Morphological types of foramen magnum. Annual Research & Review in Biology. 2014;4(9):1372–1378.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2020 Aragão, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.