Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-4426

Pediatrics & Neonatal Care

Research Article Volume 13 Issue 2

Breastfeeding practices after caesarean section (C-section) at the Essos Hospital Center

Ludovic Nguessa,1 Arsene Sandie,2 Anne Esther Njom Nlend1,3,4

1Higher Institute of Medical Technology, Cameroon
2African Population and Health Research Center, Sénégal
3Health Ebene Consulting, Research Department, Cameroon
4Essos Hospital Center, Cameroon

Correspondence: Prof. AE Njom Nlend, Higher Institute of Medical Technology, Health Ebene Consulting, Research Department, Essos Hospital Center, Yaoundé, Cameroon

Received: April 07, 2023 | Published: May 10, 2023

Citation: Nguessa L, Sandie A, Nlend AEN. Breastfeeding practices after caesarean section (C-section) at the Essos Hospital Center. J Pediatr Neonatal Care. 2023;13(2):82-85. DOI: 10.15406/jpnc.2023.13.00496

Download PDF

Summary

Background: Exclusive breastfeeding is the gold standard for infant feeding; combined with early breastfeeding, it becomes very beneficial for the child and his mother. However, caesarean section can affect its practice.

Objective: To evaluate breastfeeding practices after caesarean section in the maternity ward of the Essos Hospital Center.

Material and methods: Our retrospective and analytical cross-sectional study went from January 2020 to July 2020. Included in our sample were women who gave live-births by caesarean section at the Essos Hospital Center, whose children were alive. Interviews used a pre-established and pre-tested questionnaire, Data were collected using CSPro software version 7.3.1. The odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval was used to assess the association between the different variables. Any difference was considered statistically significant when the p-value <0.05.

Results: We recruited 70 caesarized women, all the mother-child pairs had been separated, and none of the mothers had breastfed early. Furthermore, 42.9% of lactating women had given the breast between 1 and 24 hours after birth, and 52.9% twenty-four hours later. A statistically significant association existed between the duration of separation and the delay in breastfeeding initiation (duration of separation 24h (OR= 0.07; IC= 0.00-0.42; p=0.016); 48h (OR=0, 02; CI=0.00=0.18; p=0.002); 48h-72h (OR=0.03; CI=0.00-0.28; p=0.007)).

Conclusion: In this population, caesarean section and mother-child separation played a major negative role by delaying the initiation of breastfeeding.

Keywords: breastfeeding, caesarean section, post-partum

Introduction

Breastfeeding (BF) is defined as the feeding of newborns and infants with breastmilk. Exclusive breastfeeding is the gold standard for infant feeding during the first months of life. The WHO recommends "exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life, and continued breastfeeding until the age of two years, or even beyond, according to the desires of the mothers".1–3 However, it is important to note that, in the developing world, only 38% of children under six months are exclusively breastfed; and that in Cameroon, the rate is just as low, according to the latest DHS Cameroon 2018 report, of 40% between 0-5months.4 A study conducted in Ghana shows that breastfeeding babies within an hour of birth prevent 22% of neonatal deaths; and children who are breastfed for the first few months are at least six times more likely to survive than children who are not breastfed.5 The correlation between breastfeeding, health and well-being is becoming clear. In 2017 globally, an estimated 78 million newborns waited more than an hour before being put to the breast.

This means that only about two in five children (42%), mostly born in low and middle-income countries, were breastfed within one hour of birth. In West and Central Africa.6 Despite such benefits, caesarean section negatively affects the practice of breastfeeding. In a study entitled "Birth by cesarean section and the start of breastfeeding" carried out in 2015 in France, by Sylvie Bouvarel, the start of breastfeeding presented more difficulties in the case of cesarean section than in the case of vaginal delivery birth; but there was also is a significant increase in the first latching time after csection.7 Besides the time of initiation which is delayed, the duration of the period of exclusive breastfeeding can be shortened. In addition, some authors have reported even more negative effects in the event of a planned cesarean compared to an emergency cesarean.8,9 These data are of utmost importance to consider with the increase of C-section rates even in regions with limited resources.10 Within this context we designed this monocentric study with the objective to analyze the practices of breastfeeding after C-section as well as the factors that influence it.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective and analytical cross-sectional study over a period from January 2020 to July 2020. It took place in the maternity ward of the Essos Hospital Center, a tertiary level care structure in the city of Yaoundé. Were included in our sample, women who gave birth less than 2 months ago by C-section at term of living newborns of at least 36 weeks of amenorrhea.

After consulting their medical records, they were contacted by telephone, and the study was clearly presented to them, with its objectives and informed consent. The main variables collected during the interview concerned socio-demographic characteristics, duration of the stay in the maternity ward, length of separation after C-section and breastfeeding practices. Interviews used a pre-established and pre-tested questionnaire which was validated.

Data were entered and recorded using CSPro version 7.3.1 software. All statistical analyzes were performed using R version 3.6.2 software. At the univariate level, the frequency distributions were used for the categorical variables the Chi 2 test was used to perform the test of independence between the dependent variable and the independent variables, the Fisher's Exact test was used alternatively when the conditions of applicability of the Chi 2 test were not satisfied, in addition the unadjusted ORs were estimated. At the multivariate level, logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted ORs and their 95% CI to find factors associated with early breastfeeding.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearances and administrative authorization for carrying out our study were issued by the administrative management of the Essos Hospital Center under reference number 29/20/DCHE/DA/CE-CHE/CNPS and by the Ethics and Institutional Committee of the University of Douala.

Results

The mothers contacted numbered 123. Twenty-six of them were unreachable, and 25 refused to participate in the study and two were excluded (due to incomplete collection sheets). A total of 70 mothers were recruited (see Figure 1).

Figure 1 Flow chart of recruitment.

Sociodemographic and biodemographic characteristics

The mothers who participated in this study were aged between 20 and 41, of whom 77.1% were aged between 21 and 34; the average age was 30.5 years (see Table 1 & 2).

 

N

%

Age years

 

 

21-34

54

77.1

≥35

16

22.9

Total

70

100

Employment

   

No

30

42.9

Yes

40

57.1

Total

70

100

Marital status

   

Single

17

24.3

Married

53

75.7

Total

70

100

Antenatal Follow-up

   

Yes

70

100

No

0

0

Total

70

100

Table 1 Characteristics of the population

 

N

%

Artificial Bottle feeding

6

8.6

Exclusive breast feeding (EBF)

30

42.8

Mixed feeding

34

48.6

Total

70

100.0

Table 2 Feeding mode

Feeding practices

  • Initiation and feeding option

None of the mothers reported giving the breast within one hour of birth. During the first two months, less than half of the mothers practiced EBF (see Table 3).

 

N

%

Duration of separation

 

 

<24h

12

17.1

24h

28

40.0

48h

19

27.1

>48h

11

15.7

Total

70

100.0

Admission in neonatology unit:

Yes

66

92.9

No

4

7.1

Total

70

100.0

Reason of transfer in neonatology

Surveillance

36

54.5

Special care

30

45.5

Total

66

100.0

Mother in recovery room

Yes

66

94.3

No

4

5.7

Total

70

100.0

Admission of mother in intensive unit:

Yes

5

7.1

No

65

92.9

Total

70

100.0

Table 3 Mother-child separation

  • Factors influencing early breastfeeding Mother-child separation and early breastfeeding

All the mothers had been separated from their children at birth, 40% of them for 24 hours. Sixty-five newborns had been admitted in neonatology. Considering the duration of mother-child separation <24h, it appears that the mothers in this category breastfed earlier (delay 1h-24h) than those in the other categories, namely 24h, 48h and 48-72h; statistically significant between the duration of mother-child separation and the initial breastfeeding delay (p= 0.016; 0.002 and 0.007). With the adjusted odds ratios, we observe a significant difference between the duration of mother-child separation (24 hours (p=0.026) and 48h(p=0.004)) and the time to breastfeed (Table 4 & 5).

Birth-first latch time

 

1h-24h

>24 h

Unadjusted OR (95%CI, p)

Separation time (hours)

<24h

11 (36.7)

1 (2.5)

-

 

 24h

12 (40.0)

16 (40.0)

0.07 (0.00-0.42, p=0.016)

 

 48h

4 (13.3)

15 (37.5)

0.02 (0.00-0.18, p=0.002)

 

>48h

3 (10.0)

8 (20.0)

0.03 (0.00-0.28, p=0.007)

Mother in recovery room

Yes

29 (96.7)

37 (92.5)

-

 

No

1 (3.3)

3 (7.5)

0.43 (0.02-3.52, p=0.469)

Mother admitted in intensive care unit

Yes

0 (0.0)

5 (12.5)

p=0.992

 

No

30 (100.0)

35 (87.5)

-

Admission in neonatalogy

Yes

28 (93.3)

37 (92.5)

-

 

No

2 (6.7)

3 (7.5)

0.88 (0.11-5.66, p=0.893)

Reason of admission in neonatalogy

Surveillance

18 (64.3)

18 (47.4)

-

 

Special care

10 (35.7)

20 (52.6)

0.50 (0.18-1.34, p=0.175)

Table 4 Reasons for separation from Mother and delay in breast feeding and unadjusted odds ratio

Birth-first latch time

 

Adjusted OR (95% CI, p)

Separation time (hours)

<24h

-

24h

0.04 (0.00-0.47, p=0.026)

48h

0.01 (0.00-0.16, p=0.004)

Reason for admission in Neonatology

>48h

0.07 (0.00-1.39, p=0.107)

Surveillance

-

Special care

0.36 (0.04-2.77, p=0.335)

Mother in recovery room

Yes

-

No

1.42 (0.03-64.79, p=0.844)

Age

21-34 years

-

≥35 years

0.20 (0.02-1.38, p=0.125)

Level of education

Primary

-

Secondary

0.20 (0.00-5.46, p=0.363)

Higher

0.11 (0.00-1.47, p=0.131)

Employment

No

-

Yes

1.83 (0.37-10.90, p=0.473)

Marital status

Single

-

Married

0.17 (0.01-1.31, p=0.115)

Parity

Primiparous

-

Multiparous

1.64 (0.23-15.28, p=0.638)

Type de pregnancy

Single

-

Multiple

7.60 (0.72-104.09, p=0.103)

Term

Preterm

-

Normal term

0.21 (0.02-1.69, p=0.161)

post-Term

0.74 (0.07-7.94, p=0.806)

Table 5 Multivariate distribution of factors associated with delay in breastfeeding after caesarean section

  • Difficulties during breastfeeding

We also found that 60.9% of breastfeeding mothers had encountered difficulties, and that the main one was the presence of cracks on the nipples (30.8%), followed by insufficient secretion of milk (20.5%).

Discussion

We aimed to evaluate the practices of breastfeeding after caesarean section in the maternity ward of the Essos Hospital Center. The main result is a delay in the start of breastfeeding, partly caused by the separation of the mother and the baby. However, the exclusive breastfeeding rate is similar to that recorded in the general population.4 We know that the earlier breastfeeding is started, the longer it lasts and that caesarean section significantly affects the rate of EBF by delaying the latching time.11 The breastfeeding rate observed in our series is slightly lower than that observed in the study by Wu et al in China, which showed a prevalence of 52.4% for EBF.12

  • Factors influencing early latch on after caesarean section

All of the mothers interviewed had been separated from their newborns at birth. This prolonged separation at birth negatively influenced early breastfeeding. The results obtained by Albokhary and James in 2014 in Saudi Arabia, on a population of 60 births, including 30 caesareans, are similar to our results. Their results show that none of the caesarized mothers had breastfed early; 60% had breastfed during the 24 hours following birth and 40% more than 24 hours after birth.13 The data from this site confirms a delay in the initiation of breastfeeding in these caesarized women after 24 hours, while 48% of mothers put their baby to the breast within one hour of birth according to the latest demographic health survey.4

  • Problems during breastfeeding

We also found that 60.9% of breastfeeding mothers had encountered difficulties, and that the main one was the presence of cracks on the nipples (30.8%), followed by insufficient secretion of milk (20.5%). Our result is close to that of Saeed et al, but quite different from that of Hobbs et al.9,14

Limitations of the study and recommendations

Among the limitations of the study, we note: the small size of the sample, which is due to the non-availability and massive refusals to participate; the context of the Covid-19 pandemic which made it impossible to meet the patients; the failure to take into account the type of anesthesia in this retrospective study including the type of C-section; elective or emergency caesarean section.15

In addition, the monocentric nature of this recruitment in a tertiary health facility may have overestimated the transfer rate and the duration of separation of the newborn from its mother.

Also, on the basis of this preliminary study and in view of the previously stated limits, we suggest a broader study based on data from demographic and health surveys to understand the impact of caesarean section on the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding in our context.16,17 In addition, building the capacity of staff on this site, for the essential care of the newborn after caesarean section, in particular early breastfeeding is strongly recommended, as well as the practice of skin to skin in women after caesarean especially in case of locoregional anesthesia.18,19

Conclusion

In this site, after caesarean section, the almost automatic mother-child separation greatly contributed to lengthening the time to initiate breastfeeding, with moderate effects recorded on the rate of breastfeeding during the first two months of life.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to all the mothers who participated in our study, as well as to the staff of the maternity and neonatal department.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Guideline: protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services. World Health Organization. 2017.
  2. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012.
  3. Couto GR, Dias V, de Jesus Oliveira I. Benefits of exclusive breastfeeding: An integrative review. Nursing Practice Today. 2020;7(4):245–254.
  4. Institut National de la Statistique (INS) et ICF. Enquête Démographique et de Santé du Cameroun 2018. Yaoundé, Cameroun et Rockville, Maryland, USA : INS et ICF. 2020.
  5. Allaitement | Nutrition | UNICEF [Internet].
  6. UNICEF, OMS. Saisir le moment – La mise au sein précoce : le meilleur point de départ pour chaque nouveau-né. New York, UNICEF. 2018.
  7. Sylvie Bouvarel. Démarrage de l’allaitement maternel et reprise de poids des nouveau-nés en cas de césarienne : étude d’observation à la maternité de l’Hôpital privé Drôme Ardèche. 2015.
  8. Li L, Wan W, Zhu C. Breastfeeding after a cesarean section: A literature review. Midwifery. 2021;103:103117.
  9. Hobbs AJ, Mannion CA, McDonald SW, et al. The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–9.
  10. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
  11. Zanardo V, Svegliado G, Cavallin F, et al. Elective cesarean delivery: does it have a negative effect on breastfeeding? Birth. 2010;37(4):275–279.
  12. Wu Y, Wang Y, Huang J, et al. The association between caesarean delivery and the initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study in China. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72(12):1644–1654.
  13. Albokhary AA, James JP. Does cesarean section have an impact on the successful initiation of breastfeeding in Saudi Arabia? Saudi Med J. 2014;35(11):1400–1403.
  14. Saeed G, Fakhar S, Imran T, et al. The Effect of Modes of Delivery on Infants’ Feeding Practices. Iran J Med Sci. 2011;36(2):128–132.
  15. Wen J, Yu G, Kong Y, et al. An exploration of the breastfeeding behaviors of women after cesarean section: A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020;7(4):419–426.
  16. Gedefaw G, Goedert MH, Abebe E, et al. Effect of cesarean section on initiation of breast feeding: Findings from 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. PloS one. 2020;15(12):e0244229.
  17. Paksoy Erbaydar N, Erbaydar T. Relationship between caesarean section and breastfeeding: evidence from the 2013 Turkey demographic and health survey. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;20:1–9.
  18. Dudeja S, Sikka P, Jain K, et al. Improving first-hour breastfeeding initiation rate after cesarean deliveries: a quality improvement study. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55(9):761–764.
  19. Kollmann M, Aldrian L, Scheuchenegger A, et al. Early skin-to-skin contact after cesarean section: A randomized clinical pilot study. PloS one. 2017;12(2):e0168783.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2023 Nguessa, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.