Research Article Volume 5 Issue 2
1South Staffordshire & Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, England
2St Andrew's Academic Centre, Kings College London, England
3Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Birmingham, England
Correspondence: Muhammad Gul, South Staffordshire & Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK
Received: July 02, 2015 | Published: January 28, 2016
Citation: Gul M, Rafey FA (2016) Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in the Aftermath of Wars, Conflicts and Terrorism: Co-Relation between Countries GDP and Prevalence of PTSD. J Psychol Clin Psychiatry 5(2): 00275. DOI: 10.15406/jpcpy.2016.05.00275
Background: An estimated 1.6trillion dollars per year is spent on defence, and as much as three times more people are killed by human made disasters, the reported prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder among population exposed to human-made disasters varied across different countries. The global cost of mental illness is 2.5trillion dollars, accounting for 37% of health loss years.
Aim: Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder across different region in population exposed to human-made disasters including war, conflicts and terrorist attacks. Another aim of our study was to investigate the correlation between prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and economic performance indicators of individual countries, and percentage of GDP spend on health care.
Method: The study was conducted in two stages. In stage 1 we conducted systematic literature search to establish prevalence of PTSD reported in context of human-made disasters from different countries. In stage we gathered economic performance reports and health care expenditure of respective countries. SPSS was used to identify any correlation between prevalence of PTSD, countries GDP, and percentage of GDP spend on health care expenditure.
Results: The review identifies large variation in the prevalence of post-traumatic disorder in population exposed to human-made disasters, with prevalence estimates from 0.6 to 73%. It has been found that countries with poor socioeconomic structure and lower spending on health care expenditures were seen with high prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Conclusion: Difference in prevalence of PTSD can be explained by gender, marital status, and educational background of the participants and time of the study after exposure to traumatic event. But countries socioeconomic status and per capita GPD health care expenditure were found to be significantly correlated with the difference in prevalence of PTSD in population exposed to human-made disasters.
Keywords:human-made disasters, conflicts, wars, mental illness, ptsd, cost of mental illness
CS: Cross Sectional Survey; LS: Longitudinal Survey; CC: Case Control; T: Time of Assessment; TA: Terrorists Attack; QPTS: Questionnaire for Post-Traumatic Stress; HADS: Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale; HRQL-P: Health Quality of Life –Persian; SF-36: Short Form Health Survey; PTSD Scale: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale; RW-Rate: Return to Work Rate; THQ: Trauma History Questionnaire; DSM-IV ASD: DSM-IV Acute Stress Disorder; SF-8HS: Short Form Health Survey; PDEQ: Peritraumatic Dissociative Experience Questionnaire; ZSDS: Zung Self Rating Depression Scale; PCL-S 20: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Check List, Stressor Specific Version; PSS-SR: Post-Traumatic Self Report Scale; PTSS: PTSD Total Severity Scale; HTQ: Harvard Trauma Questionnaire; GHQ-28: General Health Questionnaire -28; SCL-90-R: Symptom Check List -90 Revised; TE-CL: Traumatic Event Symptom Check List; MINI-INPI: MINI International Neuropsychiatric Review; PHQ: Patient Health Questionnaire; IES: Impact of Event Scale; EQLS: Eurohis Quality of Life Scale; CAPS: Clinician Administered PTSD Scale; PCL: PTSD Check list; GECL: Gaza Traumatic Event Check List; CRIES: Children Revised Impact of Event Scale; RCMAS-36: Revised Children Manifest Anxiety Scale; SDQ: Strength & Difficulty Questionnaire; TMAS: Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale; MOS-20: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form; COR-E: Conservation of Resources Evaluation; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; D-HSCL-25: Depression Sub-scale Hopkins Symptoms Check List 25; BDI: Brief Depression Inventory; BSI: Brief Symptoms Inventory; PWBS: Psychological Well Being Scale; MSAQL: Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life; PTSD-CL-Civ: PTSD Check list Civilian Version; LSC: Life Stressor Check List –Revised; AAQ: Acceptance and Action Questionnaire; MOSS-S: Medical Outcome Study –Social Support Scale; MCRI: Mood Coping Responses Inventory; MSC-PTSD: Mississippi Scale for Combat Related PTSD; PPS: Police Perception Survey; PSI: Post Traumatic Inventory; DES-11: Dissociative Experience Scale
It has been estimated that human made disaster kills as much as three time more people, than those killed by natural disaster [IFRC World Disaster Report]. There are more than 61 countries in the world that are at war, either with other countries or with separatist, militia, guerrilla and anarchic groups. In Africa there are 24 countries and 83 separatist groups fighting, mainly in Algeria, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia and Sudan. In Asia, there are more than 16 countries involved in fighting, which involve more than 79 militia and anarchic group, mainly in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Burma. In Middle East more than 8 countries and 78 separatist and other groups are involved in conflict, mainly in Iraq, Israel, Syria, Turkey and Yemen. According to one estimates, in the Eastern Mediterranean region of World Health Organization , more than 80% of the population is either in conflict situation or has had experienced one or more such situation in the last quarter of the 20th century.1
Since 1980 there have been more than 39 major wars and since 1970 there have been more than 98,000 Terrorist Attacks in the World National Consortium for Study and Response to Terrorism.In the last 100 years we have lost more than 187million people due to war, conflicts and terrorism, which would have been equivalent to more than 10 % of World Population in 1913.2
An estimated 1.6trillion dollars per year is spent on defence, which is equivalent to 2.6 % of World GDP, an amount of 236$ per person in the world. These conflicts, wars and act of terrorism cause significant damage to both physical and social environment of a community, are resulting in human losses, damage to properties, and disintegration of any society, with massive displacement of native population. The mental health consequences of these disasters are enormous requiring careful evaluation of community needs, identification of vulnerable groups, implementation of service provision programmes and work on prevention of secondary handicap and further morbidity. Currently the global cost of mental illness is 2.5trillion dollars, with a predicting increase to 6trillion dollars by 2030 3. Mental Illness is the leading cause of disability adjusted life year DALY, accounting for 37% of healthy loss years.4
Massive collective distress distinguishes the victims of disaster from those suffering as a result of individual trauma, which may replicate some of the same stresses carried by disaster traumas.5 Mass traumatic events, particularly terrorist attacks are associated with greater mental health effects in the population.6
Globally an estimated 10% of population exposed to traumatic events in a conflict situation develop serious mental health problems notably depression, anxiety and PTSD, with another 10 % developing behavioural difficulties leaving them with reduced level of function (WHO 2002).
Prevalence of mental health problems among population exposed to human-made disaster is reported to be varied in different studies ranging from 5% to more than 50% in some epidemiological studies. An accurate estimate of true prevalence is important in planning, assessment, and intervention stages of a community’s health response to such situations.
We conducted a mixed methods study including a systematic review of medical literature to investigate the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder attributed to human made disaster. We also reviewed economic performance indicator of countries reporting prevalence data in order to understand association between adverse economic performance and reported prevalence of mental health difficulties. We hypothesized that countries with higher prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder were performing poorly in economic performance and that higher prevalence of illness was associated with additional economic adversity suffered by the population at large, possibly through an association with poor provision of appropriate healthcare input and intervention to deal with mental health consequences of human made disaster.
We conducted this study in two stages. In first stage we conducted systematic literature search to establish a clear picture of PTSD prevalence reported in the context of human made disasters from different countries. The second stage of the study gathered economic performance reports and health expenditure data from these countries. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to calculate correlations between prevalence of PTSD, Gross Domestic Product (GDP-per capita), and Health Expenditure figures calculated as proportion of GDP of each country.
Four data bases, PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE & Psych INFO were systematically searched for psychiatric morbidity, man-made disaster, terrorism, conflicts and Wars. In addition, references of available studies were examined to identify further studies.
.Pub Med [Medline] [Searched 19th January 2012] Years 1960 - 2012
(("psychiatry"[MeSH Terms] OR "psychiatry"[All Fields] OR "psychiatric"[All Fields]) AND ("epidemiology"[Subheading] OR "epidemiology"[All Fields] OR "morbidity"[All Fields] OR "morbidity"[MeSH Terms])) AND ((("men"[MeSH Terms] OR "men"[All Fields] OR "male"[MeSH Terms] OR "male"[All Fields]) AND ("disasters"[MeSH Terms] OR "disasters"[All Fields] OR "disaster"[All Fields])) OR ("conflict (psychology)"[MeSH Terms] OR ("conflict"[All Fields] AND "(psychology)"[All Fields]) OR "conflict (psychology)"[All Fields] OR "conflicts"[All Fields]) OR ("war"[MeSH Terms] OR "war"[All Fields]) OR ("terrorism"[MeSH Terms] OR "terrorism"[All Fields]
EMBASE, Psych Info [Searched 14th January 2012]
Years 1960 – 2012
Psychiatric morbidity AND man-made disaster OR Terrorism OR War OR Conflict
Box 1: Search Strategy for Identifying PTSD Prevalence Studies
(a) Study Selection
Identified papers were examined against the inclusion criteria for the studies. Selected papers were then examined in detail.
Box 2: Inclusion Criteria
Box 3: Exclusion Criteria
(b) Data Extraction
Method, design of study, sample size, time of assessment since exposure to traumatic events, population characteristics mainly gender distribution; marital status and education were selected using the carefully designed data extraction sheet (Figure 1).
Literature search identified 2041 papers inclusive of duplicates. After exclusion through comparison of titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria, 121 papers were selected for detailed examination. 24 papers were identified, and further 14 papers were identified from the bibliography of these studies, thus 38 papers were finally selected, which gave prevalence estimates for post-traumatic stress disorder amongst the populations exposed to wars, conflicts, or terrorism.
Studies included participants from more than 20 countries across Asia, Africa, Europe and America. The study sample sizes ranged from 32 to 28,962. Only 15 studies [38%] reported the prevalence rate by gender distribution. And only 5 studies (13%) reported the prevalence data by marital status and participant’s educational background. Many studies didn’t comment on selection criteria, refusal rate, interviewers background, number of traumas, previous psychiatric history or any other physical or mental health problem, socioeconomic status and family or close friends loses to these traumatic events.
S. No |
Study Author & |
Study Design & |
Sample Size/ |
Outcome |
Prevalence |
1 |
Maya Tuchner et al. Israel |
C.S |
35 T.A |
PTSD scale |
39% |
2 |
Louise Jehel et al. |
L.S |
32 T.A |
QPTSIES |
|
3 |
Goran Arbanas et al. |
L.S |
T1= 272 |
Clinical |
T2= 73% |
4 |
Laura DiGrande et al. |
C.S |
3271 T.A |
PCL-S 20 |
15% |
5 |
Noam Shussman et al. |
C.C |
46 T.As |
PTSD Scale |
52.20% |
5 |
Laila Farhood et al. |
C.S |
257 War |
HTQ |
29.30% |
6 |
Miro Klaric et al. |
C.C |
367 War |
HTQ |
28.30% |
7 |
Nexhmedine Morina et. al. |
C.S
|
163 War
|
TE-CL, PHQ |
29.40%
|
8 |
Judith Cukor et al. |
C.S |
2960 T.A |
CAPS |
8% |
9 |
Jenannne Mager Stellman et al. |
C.S |
10.132 T.A |
PCL |
11.90% |
10 |
A.A Thabet et al. |
C.S |
200 War |
GECL, CRIES-13 |
60% |
11 |
Carol S North et al. |
L.S |
113 T.A |
DIS-DS |
T1=41% |
12 |
Katie J Campion et al. |
C.S |
1001 War |
CORE-E |
5.50% |
13 |
Khalid A Mufti et al. |
C. S |
1301 War |
SS-I |
53% |
14 |
Nexhmedine Morina et al. |
C. S |
81 War |
MINI-INPI,BDI , |
69.10% |
15
|
Ann-Charlotte |
C.S |
44 War |
HSCL-2,PTSD-S |
50%
|
16 |
Carmela Vazquez et al. |
C.S |
503 T.A |
IR-DSM-IV , |
13.30% |
17 |
Todd B Kashdan et al. |
C. S |
174 War |
MINI-INPI ,BSI |
26.40% |
18 |
Bayard Roberts et al. |
C.S |
1242 War |
HTQ HSCL-25 |
36% |
19 |
Phuong N .Pharm et al. |
C.S |
2091 War |
PCL-C CAPS |
24.80% |
20 |
Megan A Perrin et al. |
C.S |
28,962 TA |
PCL-C |
14.40% |
21 |
Pierre Verger et al. |
C.S |
196 TA |
Computer |
31.30% |
22
|
Stefan Preibe et al.
|
C. S T1= 5-15 years
|
3313 War
|
Self-
|
BH: 35.4% |
23 |
Carol S North et al. |
C.S |
182 T.A |
DI-DS |
|
24 |
Barbara Lopes Cardozo et al. |
C.C |
799 War |
SF-36 ,HSCL-25 HTQ |
42.10% |
25 |
Laila F Farhood et al. |
C.S |
33 T.A |
CAPS-1 BDI |
39.40% |
26 |
Vivian Khamis |
C.S On-going |
120 War |
DSM-III-R |
50% |
27 |
Yori Gidron et al. |
C.S |
149 T.A |
PTSD-like |
10.10% |
28 |
Jennifer Ahern et al. |
C.S |
306 War |
MOSS-S |
14.10% |
29 |
Harvey-Lintz et al. |
C.S After 1997 LA |
141 Civil Unrest |
MCRI |
17% |
30 |
Lucien Abenhaim et al. |
C. S |
254 T.A |
Self- |
18.10% |
31 |
Eve Bernstein Carlson |
C.S |
50 War /Armed |
PSI |
40% |
32 |
Jessica Cardenas et al.USA |
C.S T1= 1-2 years |
305 T.A |
SR-PTSD & |
5.90% |
33 |
Patrick A .Palmieri et al. Israel |
C.S |
1200 War |
COR-E PTSD-S |
7.20% |
34 |
Willem F. Scholte et al. Afghanistan |
C.S |
1011 War /T.A |
HTQ |
20.40% |
35 |
Joop T.VM de jong et al. |
C.S T1= Ongoing Conflict |
Algeria :653 |
Using the |
Algeria :37% |
36 |
Galea S et al. |
L.S |
T1=1008 |
SCID-DSM III R |
T1= 7.5% |
37 |
Galea S et al. |
C.S |
988 |
DSM-IV based |
8.80% |
38 |
Barbara Lopes Cardozo |
C.S |
1358 War |
GHQ-28 |
17% |
Table 1 Summary of Studies Assessing PTSD in population exposed to war, conflicts & terrorism
Study Author / Location |
Male[%]: Female[%] |
Male |
Female |
Total Prevalence & Statistical Analysis |
Louise Jehel et al. |
47 % : 53 % |
25% |
75% |
38% (df [1]P value 0.003) |
Goran Arbanas |
12% : 88% |
36% |
20% |
73% (NA) |
Laura Di Grande et al. |
58.8% : 41.2% |
9.90% |
22.40% |
15% (OR [ 2.63]) |
Laila Farhood et al. |
46% : 54% |
20.95% |
36.60% |
29.30% ( P Value < 0.0067) |
Nexhmedine Morina et al. Kosovo |
39.3% : 607% |
28.10% |
30.30% |
29.40% ( X2 090 , df =1 ) |
Jenannne Mager Stellman et al. USA |
87% : 13% |
10.90% |
12.10% |
11.90% ( N.S ) |
Carmela Vazquez et al. Spain |
33% : 67% |
11.30% |
14.40% |
13.30% (N.S) |
Phuong N .Pharm et al. Rwanda |
48.5%: 51.5% |
19.60% |
29.70% |
24.85 ( OR F:M ; 1.73[95% CI ;1.41-2.12]) |
Pierre Verger et al. |
46.4% : 54% |
23.10% |
38.10% |
31.30% ( OR M:F :2.54 [ 95% CI; 1.22-5.57]) |
Carol S North et al. USA |
51.6% : 48.4% |
23% |
45% |
34% (X2=9.44; P Value; 0.002) |
Barbara Lopes Cardozo et al. Kosovo |
37.7% : 62.3% |
12% |
19.67% |
17% ( P Value < 0.01 ) |
Barbara Lopes Cardozo et al. Afghanistan |
37% : 63% |
32.14% |
48.30% |
42.10% ( P Value < 0.001 ) |
Lucien Abenhaim et al. France |
51% : 49 % |
16.90% |
19.3% ` |
18.10% (N.S) |
Jessica Cardenas et al.USA |
25% : 74% |
1.30% |
4.60% |
5.90% ( P Value < 0.01 ) |
Patrick A. Palmieri et al. Isarael |
48.3% : 51.8% |
4.30% |
9.90% |
7.20% (Fisher exact test P Value < 0.001). |
Table 2 Studies explaining the variation in prevalence of PTSD by gender
Study Author & Location |
Marital Status (PTSD %) |
Education (PTSD %) |
||||
Laura DiGrande et al. |
Married= 11.8% |
H.S= 60% |
||||
USA |
Divorced =25.4% |
College =11.5% |
||||
Widow= 21.4% |
Postgraduate=8% |
|||||
Jenannne Mager Stellman et al. USA |
Single=11.6% |
H.S= 17.2% |
||||
Married =10.2% |
> H.S =12.2% |
|||||
Separated=14.6% |
College=9.6% |
|||||
Widow=13% |
Graduate College=8.8% |
|||||
>G. College =10.7% |
||||||
P Value < 0.001 |
||||||
P Value < 0.001 |
||||||
Barbara Lopes Cardozo et al. Kosovo |
Married =16.49% |
< Pr.Education= 21.29% |
||||
Single=15.14% |
Pr.Education=15.99% |
|||||
Divorced=10..48% |
Secondary School =15.8% |
|||||
Widow=30.96% |
University = 11.01% |
|||||
Barbara Lopes Cardozo et al. |
|
Married =42.43% |
No Education= 75.6% |
|||
Afghanistan |
Widow =41.47% |
Pr.Education=18% |
||||
Single=43.19% |
H.S=6.5% |
|||||
Pierre Verger et al. |
Married or in |
Low Education : 30.8% |
||||
relationship=25.4% |
High Education : 31.8% |
|||||
Living Alone =44.8% |
||||||
OR :2.29 [95% CI 1.09-4.72] |
Table 3 Prevalence of PTSD & participants’ marital status and education background
Countries |
Prevalence Range (%) |
GDP ( per capita Income)** |
Heath Care Expenditure (% of GDP )*** |
|
Afghanistan |
20% to 53% |
1000$ |
7.4 |
|
Algeria |
37% |
7200$ |
5.8 |
|
Bosnia |
28.% to 35% |
8200$ |
10.8 |
|
Herzegovina Cambodia |
40% |
2300$ |
5.9 |
|
Croatia |
18.2%-73 % |
18,300$ |
7.8 |
|
E Salvador |
50% |
7600$ |
6.4 |
|
Ethiopia |
11.50% |
1100$ |
4.3 |
|
France |
18% to 25% |
35000$ |
11.7 |
|
Gaza |
185 to 50 % |
2900$ |
NA |
|
Israel |
5.5 % to 52 % |
31,000 |
7.6 |
|
Kosovo |
14% to 69% |
6400$ |
NA |
|
Lebanon |
29% to 39 % |
15,600$ |
8.1 |
|
Macedonia |
10.60% |
10,400$ |
6.9 |
|
Rwanda |
25% |
1300$ |
9 |
|
Spain |
13.30% |
30,600$ |
9.7 |
|
Serbia |
18.80% |
10,700$ |
9.9 |
|
Somalia |
50% |
600$ |
5.9 |
|
Sudan |
36% |
3000$ |
7.3 |
|
United States of America |
0.6 % to 34 % |
48,000$ |
16.2 |
|
Table 4 Prevalence o PTSD and Countries GDP
**Source: CIA World Fact-book. *** World Bank Data
We collected countries’ GDP data and health expenditure data as a proportion of GDP from United States of America Government website that was freely accessible as a useful source of information.
We calculated Correlations between prevalence of PTSD, GDP (per capita income) and countries health expenditure (as % of GDP). We used Pearson Correlations Test using SPSS in order to test the study hypothesis.
The test provided confirmation of study hypothesis. GDP (per capita income) and Healthcare Expenditure (as % of GDP) were negatively correlated with prevalence of PTSD. We used statistical analysis conducting statistical testing using prevalence figures reported from different countries. Where more than one study reported prevalence figures from a country we used the lower figure for our hypothesis testing. Pearson correlation coefficient was -.569 (P<0.01) for GDP-per capita income and PTSD prevalence. Pearson correlation coefficient was -.496 (P<0.05) for Healthcare Expenditure and PTSD prevalence.
The review found a large amount of variation in the prevalence of post-traumatic disorder in population exposed to human made disasters that includes wars, conflicts and terrorism (Table 1). The prevalence estimates have been from 0.6 to 73 %. Although no statistical analysis was done, it was noted that most of the studies with smaller sample size yields high prevalence rate.7‒10 The research period to estimate the prevalence is again debatable in these studies, as some of the studies11‒13 reported their initial time of assessment from as early as few days to few weeks for probably diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder. On the other hand, some of the studies carried their initial assessment almost a decade after the population exposure to massive and collective traumatic events.14‒17 Some variation in the prevalence rate can be explained as studies were carried out in areas where the population remain exposed to these traumatic events and continue to live in these areas of conflict.18‒23 Having experienced a single traumatic event and remain living in conflict zone with continuous exposure to multiple traumatic events, fear of life with minimal social support may be seen as another factor for some of the variation in the prevalence.
Some studies2,3,5,8,10,12,14,21,24‒28 commented on prevalence of PTSD in population exposed to human-made disasters into male and female groups (Table 2). Some of the studies found significant statistical variation in prevalence of PTSD in male and female, with female more likely to suffer from PTSD after exposure to traumatic events.
Few studies2,6,21,24,27 reported the prevalence of PTSD according to participant’s marital status and education background (Table 3). It has been noted that being married or in relationship and have a higher education were protective factors against PTSD.
We also try to understand the variation in prevalence of PTSD in different regions and countries by their socioeconomic structure and health care expenditure (Table 4). Countries with poor socioeconomic structure lower GDP and lower spending on health care expenditure was seen with high prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder.29‒32
Large degree of variation in prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder was found, so funnel plot to exclude publication bias was not considered. In some of the studies, time since the traumatic event was not documented.33‒36 There may be some selection bias because papers not likely to generate significant clinical interest, paper with smaller studies, with un-remarkable results or published in languages other than English, may not have been identified in the searches or published. There were few studies from Afghanistan, none from Iraq & Pakistan, Yemen ,some parts of Russia, countries going through significant civil unrest, and have been victim of significant numbers of terrorist attacks on general population.37‒39 Another limitation of the review would be that most of the studies didn’t comment on participants’ previous history of mental health illness or whether any efforts were made to ensure that assessment of incidence were carried out among population group with no previous exposure to traumatic events.40,41
This review will contribute in explaining some of the variation in prevalence data of serious mental health problem among population exposed to human-made disasters. Some of the variation can be explained by difference in prevalence by gender, marital status and education of the participants, socio-economic status which was noted to have large regional variation. Other explanation could be access to better therapeutic services and early intervention in some part of the world and less awareness of mental health illness in other parts of the World. Another important factor would be exposure to multiple traumatic events both at individual and community level. One substantial factor would be population migration due to conflicts, wars and terrorist attacks, which also cause significant socio-economic disruption to the society. It is also likely that population with better coping strategies to collective traumas may remain in the area of conflict or on the other hand those with significantly reduced level of functioning , or poor economic status never able to move out of the conflict zone, which may skewed the prevalence data in either direction.
None.
Author declares there are no conflicts of interest.
None.
©2016 Gul, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.