Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-6445

Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry

Research Article Volume 10 Issue 1

Post-traumatic stress disorder and coping mechanism among migrant returnees from middle east countries in Amhara region, Ethiopia

Atinkut Zewdu,1 Yemataw Wonde,1 Dessalegn Kassaw,1 Muna Suleyiman1

1Department of Psychology, Ambo University, Ethiopia
2Department of Psychology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia
3Department of Psychology, MizanTepi University, Ethiopia
4Department of Early Childhood Care and Education, Ambo University, Ethiopia

Correspondence: Atinkut Zewdu, Department of Psychology, Ambo University, Ethiopia

Received: April 14, 2018 | Published: January 7, 2019

Citation: Zewdu A, Wonde Y, Kassaw D, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder and coping mechanism among migrant returnees from middle east countries in Amhara region, Ethiopia. J Psychol Clin Psychiatry.2019;10(1):5?16. DOI: 10.15406/jpcpy.2019.10.00622

Download PDF

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess risk factors and measure prevalence rates of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Coping Mechanisms of migrant returnees from Middle East countries in Amhara Region, Ethiopia.

Methods: Mixed method explanatory research design was employed on 376 randomly selected migrant returnees in six nominated towns of the region. PTSD checklist and Coping Strategy Indicator were employed for assessment. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and interview were also utilized. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test and MANOVA were utilized to analyze the collected data.

Result: The general life time prevalence rate of PTSD was 26.2%. Correspondingly, avoidance, intrusive thought and hyper arousal were reported core symptoms of PTSD in their due order. Likewise, to improve quality of life, failure in educational endeavor, peer and family pressure, unemployment and poverty were the major factors for migration to Middle East. In this study, the independent t-test result shows that there was statistically significant mean difference between male and female respondents in experiencing intrusive thought (t (374)=-2.62, p<0.05), avoidance (t (374)=-3.14, p<0.05) and hyper arousal (t (374)=-2.86, p< 0.05). Besides, current employment status of returnees had statistically significant effect in experiencing intrusive thought (t (374)=2.45, p<0.05), avoidance (t (374)=-2.42, p<0.05) and hyper arousal (t (374) = 2.10, p<0.05). In addition, a MANOVA result revealed that there were statistically significant differences between participants with their respective age (F (6,522)=2.230, p˂0.05), educational status (F (9,665)=3.051, p<0.05), average monthly income (F (6,522)=0.867, p˂0. 05) and types of abuse they faced (F (9,635)=2.113, p˂0. 05) on PTSD dimensions (intrusive thought, avoidance and hyper arousal). Correspondingly, ANOVA result disclosed that age, educational status, types of abuse returnees’ face and monthly income in the Middle East had statistically significant effect on intrusive thought, avoidance and hyper arousal separately. As contributing factors for PTSD, limitations on freedom of movement, enforced cultural isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, excessive working hours, being arrested, confiscation of documents, withholding of wage and life threatening trial were highly reported problems. Finally, problem solving, seeking social support and avoidance coping mechanisms were utilized in their due order.

Conclusion: The life time prevalence rate of PTSD were very high. Therefore, mental health service providers shall consider in diagnosing and treating PTSD among migrant returnees.

Keywords: PTSD, coping mechanism, migrant returnees, Middle East

Introduction

Migration is a process of moving across international borders and/or within a state. It is a movement, encompassing any kind of movement of people, whatever its length, composition and causes.1 In addition, a migrant returnee is an individual who had left his/her place of origin regardless of any reason, but who has returned to his/her place of origin.2 The migration process involves separation from country of origin, family members, and familiar customs; exposure to a new physical environment; and navigation of unfamiliar cultural contexts. Stresses involved in the immigration experience can cause or exacerbate mental health difficulties, including anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substance abuse, suicidal ideation, and severe mental illness.3 Likewise, the severing of these networks and the removal of interpersonal and socio-cultural supports that may follow migration can contribute to negative social and psychological health outcomes for individuals and groups.4 Moreover, the transition may be followed by unforeseen negative consequences and may require exceptional social adjustments.5 Although the process of migration-adaptation is a challenging experience, it can also mean hope for a better future for many individuals. A report by Human Rights Watch on abuse against migrants6 states that more than 215 million people live outside their country of birth. Of which, 10.2 % of global migrants will hail from Africa.2 The total number of Ethiopian migrants in 2010 alone amounted to around 620,100. Their main destinations of the continents were Africa (8.6%), Asia (37.5%), Europe (21.4%), Latin and North America (31.4%).7 In the past ten years, Middle East countries become common destination for Ethiopian migrants in search of a better future.8−10 In the first half of 2012 alone, over 160,000 Ethiopians were migrated to Saudi Arabia to work in the domestic sector as maids on time-bound contracts arranged by a wide variety of Private Employment Agencies (PEAs). The trend expanded especially with the change of government in 1991. On this issue, De Regt11 argues that Ethiopians migrating to the Middle East before the early 1990s were small in number. With the overthrow of the communist regime in 1991, the right to free movement was provided for all Ethiopians. Since then there has been a massive influx of both women and men to the Gulf region to take up menial occupations. Women constitute a higher proportion of the labor migrants than men because there is more demand for domestic workers. Domestic workers are mainly employed to carry out activities including cleaning, child minding, servicing, gardening or care-taking of elderly people in all sectors of private households. In addition to being employed in such challenging activities, women domestic workers in the Middle East also experienced overwork, denial of food and salary, lack of medication, imprisonment, sexual assault and emotional and physical abuse.12−15

Many literatures including Meskerem,16 Gebeyehu,17 Esubalew,18 IOM19 and ILO20 clearly demonstrated that trafficked victims faced exploitative and coercion conditions at work places in destination countries including long working hours, restricted movement through confiscation of passports, isolation and inability to change employers. Victims may also be subjected to different forms of physical, sexual, verbal and emotional abusein the hands of traffickers and employers. These abusive behavior together with the absence of medical care, result in untreated physical injuries, mental health problems, unwanted pregnancy and even death. In the most extreme instances, the victims become slaves, pure and simple, losing all control over their lives and becoming objects to be bought and sold on the prostitution market.21 In line with this, from 1999 -2005 the Quarantine Office of the Addis Ababa International Airport reported 129 female bodies returned from Jeddah, Dubai, and Beirut. In all cases the cause of death was determined to be suicide.19 Anbesse, et al.22 study on returnees from the Middle East to Ethiopia arose due to the observations of the number of return migrants seeking professional psychiatric help. The authors suggest that this is just the tip of the iceberg of mental disorders experienced by female migrants and it is an area of concern. Many scholars reported that migrant domestic workers are vulnerable to migration-related stress and mental health problems.12−24 Particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression were highly reported.25 Therefore, PTSD is a form of anxiety disorder characterized by a set of symptoms of avoidance, numbing, intrusiveness, and hyper arousal, brought about by a traumatic event or experience.25

Mental health problems were highly prevalent among Ethiopia migrant returnees from Middle East countries.16−18 Another study conducted by Lurie26 indicated that the prevalence rate of PTSD on Ethiopian migrants in Israel was 23%. In addition, a study conducted by Galea, Rockers, Saydee, Macauley, Varpilah & Kruk27 indicated that the prevalence rate of PTSD in Nimba, Liberia, was 48.3% (n=664). Hence, Ostrovschi, et al.28 designated that PTSD was diagnosed among 35.8% of illegal migrant women in Moldova, Eastern Europe who had returned to their country of origin. Coping skills are also in evidence, however, including spiritual sources of coping, maintenance of friendships with other Ethiopian women, and reassertion of one’s cultural identity. Spiritual sources of coping were found to be an important coping mechanism among East African migrants in Australia.29 Ethiopian migrants were being detained and would need to be repatriated by Middle East countries government because numerous restrictions have been imposed in their legislation of new labor law to maintain the highly privilege position of their nation. Hence, it is believed that migrants bring their culture, tradition, social life and religious beliefs, which in most cases are different from the host society. This development poses economic, social and cultural threats to the local population. Though it is so difficult to determine the reliable data about the static number of migrant returnees, 181,218 migrant returnees from Middle East countries were deported through Bole International Airport as of January 18/2014 among whom 49,418 migrant returnees were from Amhara region.30 Many deportees reported that migrants returned empty handed and not having repaid debts to those who smuggled them, many, particularly female trafficking victims, were referred to care and rehabilitation centers due to severe traumatization and physical abuse. In spite of the difficulties that domestic workers face and the consequences of these challenges, the number of migrants is increasing rapidly in the world.

In general, despite those recent attempts to describe migrant returnees’ issue, research on migrants’ vulnerability, hardships and adjustment difficulties, mental health problems and the resistance resources in the adaptation process is not well researched in Amhara region. This study, therefore, was undertaken to address this significant gap in research. This study was intended to address the following basic research questions:

  1. What is the prevalence rate of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among migrant returnees from Middle East countries in Amhara region?
  2. What are the major factors that force migrants for migrating into the Middle East countries?
  3. What types of traumatic events contribute to PTSD among migrant returnees?
  4. Is there any statistically significant difference in experiencing PTSD dimensions across returnees’ sex, age, employment status, educational status, income and types of abuse they face?
  5. What kinds of coping mechanism are most commonly used by migrant returnees?

Materials and methods

Study design                                                                                   

The purpose of the present study was to assess the determinant factors and prevalence rate of PTSD and Coping Mechanisms among migrant returnees in Amhara region. To achieve this purpose, mixed method explanatory research design was employed.

Study area

Amhara region is one of the nine ethnic divisions (regions) of Ethiopia. The Amhara region is bordered by the nation of Sudan to the west, and the Ethiopian regions of Tigray to the north, Afar to the east, Benishangul-Gumuz to the west and southwest, and Oromia to the south. Based on the 2007 Census of the Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia (CSA), the Amhara Region has a population of 17,221,976 among whom 8,641,580 were men. For the entire Region 3, 983,768 households were counted. With regarding to religion, 82.5% Christian (orthodox), 17.2% Muslim, 0.2% protestant and 0.1% were other faiths. Additionally, 28% of the total population had access to safe drinking water, of which 19.89% were rural inhabitants. Values for other reported common indicators of the standard of living for Amhara region include the following: 17.5% of the inhabitants fall into the lowest wealth quintile; adult literacy for men is 54% and for women 25.1%; and there is only one residential facility in the country for chronically mentally ill and several other residential facilities, which have served mentally ill clients along with their beneficiaries. Having this, this study was conducted in six study sites of the region that were already identified as hotspot areas for migration from Ethiopia to the Middle East based on Disaster Prevention and Food Security and Labor and Social Affairs of Amhara Regional Administrative Office. The study sites included Debire Tabor, Bahir Dar, Habiru, Dessie, Kemisie, and Ataye towns. In these study sites, human trafficking is highly prevalent.

Sampling and sample size determination

The target population of this study was migrant returnees who migrate for the purpose of better quality of life but deported forcefully by Middle East countries. According to the Disaster Prevention and Food Security of Amhara Regional Administrative Office (DPFS), 49,418 migrant returnees were registered for social and economic reintegration until January 30/2014. Proportionate stratified sampling was employed to determine the number of participants across study sites. 423 returnees were randomly selected from 6 towns in Amhara region. However, data collectors could collect 376 properly filled questionnaires. The rest 47 questionnaires were discarded for incompleteness. Due to this, the study analysis was done based on the response of 376 study participants. Simple random sampling was used to recruit returnees from each study sites. Besides, 18 core government stakeholders in different level, 25 migrant returnees, 15 parents of migrant returnees and 4 brokers in the prison were also selected by using available sampling technique.

Variables

Dependent variables of the study were migrant returnees’ posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and coping mechanisms. The primary independent variables for this study were returnees’ demographic characteristics including their age, sex, educational status, marital status, average monthly income, current employment status and types of abuse migrant returnees’ face.

Data collection instruments

Full scale pre-established questionnaires, focus group discussion (FGD) and interview were used to gather the required data from samples. Ultimately, the questionnaire has five sections where the first section collects data on respondents’ demographic characteristics. This includes age, sex, educational status, average monthly income, current employment status and types of abuse they face. The second section of the questionnaire was PTSD checklist (PCL) to assess the prevalence rate of Post-traumatic stress disorder. The third section of the questionnaire wasCoping Strategy Indicator (CSI-33) to identify which coping mechanisms are commonly used by migrant returnees. In addition, the forth section of the questionnaire was abusive behavioral checklist to identify the contributing factors for PTSD among migrant returnees. Finally,self-developed interview and FGD were employed to assess traumatic experiences that contribute for PTSD of returnees from Middle East countries.

PTSD checklist (PCL)

PTSD checklist (PCL)was developed by researchers at the national center to measure PTSD.31 The PCL is a standardized self-report rating scale comprising 17 items that correspond to the key symptoms of PTSD. The PCL is self-administered and respondents indicate how much they have been bothered by a symptom over the past month using point (1–5) scale, circling their responses. Responses range from 1 Not at All up to 5 extremely. Regarding to its scoring system, a total score of 44 is considered to be PTSD positive for the general population while a total score of 50 is considered to be PTSD positive in military populations. Studies show that PCL has high validity and reliability. For example, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients .94, .85, .85, and .87 for the PCL total, re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyper arousal scores, respectively were indicative of high internal consistency.32 A cutoff score of 50 for a PTSD diagnosis has demonstrated good sensitivity (.78 to .82) and specificity (.83 to .86). Lowering the cutoff score to 44 revealed better sensitivity (.94), specificity (.86) and overall diagnostic efficiency (.90) with MVA victims.33,34

Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI)

The Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI), developed by Amirkhan,35 is intended as a widely applicable self-report measure of situational coping encompassing the strategies of avoidance, problem solving and seeking social support. The Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI) is a 33-item, 3-point self-report rating scale designed to assess 3 basic modes of coping. Responses on each of the CSI’s 33-items are indicated by means of a three point scale: a lot (3), a little (2), or not at all (1). The three subscales each contain 11 items and subscale scores are calculated by summing responses to appropriate items (range 0–33), higher scores indicate greater use of the strategy. Subjects select a stressful event from their lives and briefly describe it. The event must have occurred within the past six months and must be considered important. Then subjects, keeping that event in mind, respond to 33 questions. On top of that, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients indicate adequate internal consistency for each of the subscales ranging from 0.86 to 0.98 for Problem Solving, 0.89 to 0.98 for Seeking Social Support and from 0.77 to 0.96 for Avoidance.36 Regarding to the internal reliabilities for the CIS, another study conducted by Desmond, et al.37 in a sample of 618 British individuals with a chronic health challenge, namely amputation of a limb show that Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of .9220 and .8687 were obtained for the Problem Solving and Support Seeking scales, respectively. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient calculated for Avoidance scale was .79.

Pilot test

The pilot study was conducted in Gondar town, North Gondar zone, North West Ethiopia, on 80 migrant returnees from Middle East countries. Before collecting the final data, the tools were translated in to Amharic language.Content validity of the English and Amharic version was assessed by two clinical psychologists from University of Gondar. The translation consistency of the instrument was also examined by three language experts from University of Gondar. Based on the comments and suggestions of the experts changes were made in wording of two trauma items. In the pilot study, the reliabilities of the tools were found to be 0.93 and 0.87 for PTSD checklist scale and Coping Strategy Indicator respectively for full scale.

Data collection procedures

To collect data for the study, six supervisors were dispatched in which one supervisor for each study site were assigned. The role of supervisors was to train data collectors, oversee participant recruitment and data collection and checking and controlling data quality. A total of 24 data collectors (four for each site) with at least a diploma level training mainly in the social sciences were recruited. Half-day training was provided for the data collectors on the purpose of the study, the contents of the data collection instruments, ethical matters, and on how to recruit and approach participants. Data collectors went door to door in areas where migrant returnees were available via the guidance of key informants in each locality. The data- collection process was closely followed-up by the supervisors.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics including percentages, number of cases, cross-tabulations, mean and standard deviation were used to describe migrant returnees’ PTSD and coping mechanism. MANOVA and independent sample t- test and one sample t-test were also used to analyze the collected data. All data were analyzed using Statistical package for Social Science (SPSS) for window version 20.

Ethical consideration

Oral as well as written informed consent was secured from the respondents. In addition, written permission was obtained from the respective officials of the institutions and organizations where the respondents were recruited based on an official request letter issued by University of Gondar.

Result

As can be seen from Table 1, out of 376 migrant returnees, most 207 (55.1%) were males and 169 (44.9%) were females. The mean age of the respondents was 25.87 (SD=5.876) where the minimum and maximum ages were 16 and 52 respectively. With respect to marital status, 227 (60.4 %), 112 (29.8 %) and 37 (9.8%) respondents were single, married and divorced respectively. Regarding to educational status, out of all respondents, 109 (29%) had found to be grade 9 and above, followed by 98 (26.1%) 5 up to 8 graders. 89 (23.7%) migrant returnees were illiterates and 80 (21.3%) were from grade 1 up to 4. Of all the respondents, 230 (61.2%) were currently unemployed while 146 (38.8%) were employed. Furthermore, with regard to the average monthly income when they were in Middle East countries, out of all respondents, most 153 (40.7%) had found to be categorized as middle income, followed by lower income 142 (37.8%) and upper income 81 (21.5%). Finally, out of the total respondents, most of 173(46 %) were victim of multiple abuses, followed by 80 (21.3%) financially abused respondents.while 66(17.6 %)and 57 (15.2 %)were physically and sexually abused respondents respectively.

                Demographic Variable

Categories

Frequency

     Percentile

Sex

Male

207

55.1

 

Female

169

44.9

Age

Mean                        SD

Minimum

Maximum

 

25.87                       5.876

16

52

Marital Status

Married

112

29.8

 

Single

227

60.4

 

Divorced

37

9.8

Educational Status

Illiterate

89

23.7

 

Grade 1-4

80

21.3

 

Grade 5-8

98

26.1

 

Grade 9& above

109

29.0

Current Employment Status

Unemployed

230

61.2

Employed

146

38.8

Monthly Income in Middle East

Lower Income (≤ 1200 Riyal)

142

37.8

Middle Income (1201-2500 Riyal)

153

40.7

Upper Income (>2501 Riyal)

81

21.5

Types of Abuse

Physical Abuse

66

17.6

 

Sexual Abuse

57

15.2

 

Financial Abuse

80

21.3

 

Multiple Abuse

173

46.0

Table 1 Demographic characteristic of the respondents

General prevalence rate of PTSD among migrant returnees

In order to assess the general prevalence rate of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD checklist scale was employed and presented. As can be shown from Table 2, the optimal cut-off point for the PTSD checklist has been generally reported to be below 43 for normal and greater than 44 for clinically PTSD positive. Based on this, out of 376 participants, 98 (26.2%) were PTSD positive while the rest 278 (73.8%) were PTSD non-symptomatic. For this reason, the general lifetime prevalence rate of post-traumatic stress disorder was 26.2%. Among the dimensions of post-traumatic stress disorder, avoidance, intrusive thought and hyper arousal were highly observed respectively. More specifically, feelings of numbness, nightmares, and flashbacks were highly reported by most of returnees. According to the crosstab result, even higher prevalence rate of PTSD was found among single, illiterate, returnees with lower monthly income, currently unemployed and victim of multiple abuse female participants.

Variable

     Category

Frequency

Percent

PTSD Score

PTSD normal(0-43)

278

73.8

 

PTSD positive( ≥44 )

98

26.2

Table 2 General prevalence rate of PTSD

Causes of migration to Middle East countries

To understand the determinant factors for migration to Middle East countries, self-developed closed ended questionnaire were presented for interviewees. Out of 25 interviewees, (92%)to improve personal and family life situation, (88%)poverty and poor life situation of the families, (84%)to search for better life and better paying job, (80%)failure to succeed in educational endeavors, (72%)unemployment, (68%)to get initial capital to start a business, (56%)peer and family pressure, (48%) success of others and (32%)failed marriage were highly reported factors for migration.Interviewees reported that the overall context of poverty, especially rural poverty was the most important push factor. Socio-economic poverty is manifested in the form of a large and predominantly young rural population with limited access to means of production such as land, limited access to social services including vocational, higher education and limited employment opportunities.

Contributing factors for PTSD among migrant returnees

As shown in Table 3, out of the total 25 interviewees, the highest problem 24 (96%) were confiscations of documents; 23 (92%) returnees faced limitation on freedom of movement and 23 (92%) of returnees exposed for verbal abuse. Similarly, 22 (88%) of respondents complained threaten to impose even worse working condition; 19 (76%) excessive working hours (>8) was also highly reported problem faced by returnees; 18 (72%) respondents were arrested with insignificant reason. Correspondingly, 14 (56%) withholding of wage and 13 (52%) life threatening trial were highly reported by domestic migrants. Hence, 9(36%) sexual harassment by employers and their sons, 8(32%) robbery, 8(32%) bribe, 6(24%) denial of access to food, 3(12%) enforced cultural isolation and 2(8%) enforcement to engage in commercial sex, drug and alcohol trafficking were reported by some. In line with this, some interviewees reported that their employers take them to a relative or friend’s house to clean and/or cook if ever they manage to complete their work a bit earlier. Moreover, most of interviewees responded that their working environment, gender, social class and race exposed them for inhuman abuse and exploitation.

No

Contributing factors for PTSD at destination

Response Categories

Yes

No

Total

N (%)     

N (%)     

N (%)     

1

Have you been imprisoned?

18 (72)

7 (28)

25 (100)

2

Do your employer withhold of your wage?

14 (56)

11(44)

25 (100)

3

Do your employer deny of access to food?

6 (24)

19 (76)

25 (100)

4

Have your employer threatened you to impose even worse working conditions?

22 (88)

3 (12)

25 (100)

5

Have you exposed for excessive working hours (>8)?

19 (76)

6 (24)

25 (100)

6

Have you experienced any history of sexual harassment by employers and their sons?

9 (36)

16 (64)

25 (100)

7

Have your employer enforced you for cultural isolation?

3 (12)

22 (88)

25 (100)

8

Have your employer confiscated your documents?

24 (96)

1 (4)

25 (100)

9

Have you bothered by limitations on freedom of movement?

23(92)

2 (8)

25 (100)

10

Have you exposed for life threatening trial?

13 (52)

12 (48)

25 (100)

11

Have your employer abused you verbally?

23 (92)

2 (8)

25 (100)

12

Have your employer enforced you for commercial sex, drug and alcohol trafficking?

2 (8)

23 (92)

25 (100)

13

Have you ever exposed for robberies?

8 (32)

17 (68)

25 (100)

14

Have you ever exposed for bribe?

8 (32)

17 (68)

25 (100)

Table 3 List of contributing factors for PTSD at destination countries (N=25)

Comparisons of PTSD dimensions among migrant returnees’ sex

As can be revealed in Table 4, the independent t-test result shows that there was statistically significant mean difference between male and female respondents in experiencing intrusive thought(t(374)=-2.62, p<0.05), avoidance (t (374) = -3.14, p < 0.05) and hyper arousal (t (374) = -2.86, p < 0.05). Here, the mean score of intrusive thought (M=13.93, SD=5.20), avoidance (M=18.14, SD=6.67) and hyper arousal (M=13.04, SD=4.02) for female respondents was higher than mean score of intrusive thought (M=12.55, SD=4.96), avoidance (M=16.12, SD=5.79) and hyper arousal (M=11.80, SD=4.24) of male respondents.

Outcome Variable

Sex

Df

t

Sig.

Male (n=207)

Female (n=169)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Intrusive thought

12.55(4.96)

13.93(5.20)

374

-2.62

.009

Avoidance

16.12 (5.79)

18.14 (6.67)

374

-3.14

.002

Hyper arousal

11.80 (4.24)

13.04 (4.02)

374

-2.86

.004

Table 4 Comparisons of PTSD dimensions across respondents’ sex
p˂0.05 (2- tailed) M, mean; SD, standard deviation; df, degree of freedom

Comparisons of PTSD dimensions among migrant returnees’ employment status

As shown in Table 5, the independent t-test result shows that there was statistically significant mean difference between currently employed and currently unemployed respondentsin experiencing intrusive thought (t(374) = 2.45, p < 0.05), avoidance (t(374)= -2.42, p< 0.05) and hyper arousal (t (374) =2.10, p< 0.05).Correspondingly, the mean score of intrusive thought (M=13.68, SD=5.20), avoidance (M=17.65, SD=6.45) and hyper arousal (M=12.72, SD=4.31) for currently unemployed returnees was higher than mean score of intrusive thought (M=12.36, SD=4.88), avoidance (M=16.05, SD=5.90) and hyper arousal (M=11.79, SD=3.91) of currently employed returnees.

Outcome variable

                Employment Status

Df

t

Sig. 

Currently Unemployed (n=230)

Currently Employed (n=146)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Intrusive thought

13.68(5.20)

12.36(4.88)

374   

2.455   

.015   

Avoidance

17.65 (6.45)

16.05 (5.90)

374

2.422

.016

Hyper arousal

12.72 (4.31)

11.79 (3.91)

374

2.108

.036

Table 5 Comparisons of PTSD dimensions across returnees’ employment status
p˂0.05 (2- tailed)   M, mean; SD, standard deviation; df, degree of freedom

The Effect of migrant returnees’ demographic variable on ptsd dimensions

To see whether significant statistical difference exists in PTSD dimensions (intrusive thought, avoidance and hyper arousal) by age, educational status, average monthly income and types of abuse migrant returnees face, multi variant analysis of variance was computed and was presented.

As can be seen in the Table 6, a multi variant analysis of variance result revealed that there were statistically significant differences between respondents with their respective age (F (6,522)=2.230, p˂0.05), educational status (F (9,665)=3.051, p<0.05), average monthly income (F (6, 522)=0.867, p˂0. 05) and types of abuse (F (9,635)= 2.113, p˂0. 05) on PTSD dimensions (intrusive thought, avoidance and hyper arousal), but with different degrees of effect size.

Independent Variables

Wilks' Lambda Value

F

df

Sig.

Partial Eta Square

Observed Power

Age

0.951

2.230  

6,522  

0.039  

0.025

0.786

Educational Status

0.902

3.051

9,665

0.001

0.034

0.931

Monthly Income

0.867

6.411

6,522

0.000

0.069

0.999

Types of Abuse

0.931

2.113

9,635

0.027

0.024

0.785

Table 6 MANOVA result for PTSD dimensions across demographic variables of returnees
Computed using alpha = .05

Comparisons of PTSD dimensions among returnees’ demographic variable

Since a significant multivariate main effect had found for each factor, it is possible to go ahead and do the univariate analysis of variance where we look at each dependent variable in turn to see if the independent variables had a significant impact on them separately. To see the difference, univariant analysis of variance was computed and presented as follows.

As can be seen from Table 7, the univariant analysis of variance result showed that returnees’ age had significant effect on returnees’ intrusive thought (F (2,373) =28.586, p ˂0.05), avoidance (F(2, 373)=18.442, p˂0.05) and hyper arousal (F (2,373) =13.778, p ˂0.05) symptoms. Furthermore, the Benferroni post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that adolescent (13-20 years old) respondents demonstrated highly significant mean difference on avoidance symptom as compared to early adulthood (21-29 years old) (p˂ 0.05) and middle adulthood and above (30 and above years old) (p˂0.05). The mean avoidance score of adolescence respondents (M=19.46, SD=6.39) was higher than early adulthood (M=16.06, SD=6.14) and middle adulthood and above (30 and above years old) (M=15.09, SD=5.26) counter parts. Along with this, adolescence (13-20 years old) respondents demonstrated highly significant mean difference on intrusive thought as compared to early adulthood (21-29 years old) (p˂ 0.05) and middle adulthood (30 and above years) (p ˂ 0.05). The mean intrusive thought score of adolescent respondents (M=15.50, SD=5.20) was higher than early adulthood (M=12.51, SD=4.76) and middle adulthood and above (M=10.98, SD=4.17) counter parts. In addition, adolescence (13-20 years old) respondents demonstrated highly significant mean difference on hyper-arousal symptom as compared to early adulthood (21-29 years old) (p˂ 0.05) and middle adulthood (30 and above years) (p ˂ 0.05). The mean hyper-arousal score of adolescent respondents (M=13.74, SD=4.19) was higher than early adulthood (M=11.93, SD=4.05) and middle adulthood and above (M=11.10, SD=3.84) counter parts. However, least significant intrusive thought, avoidance and hyper arousal pair wise mean differences were obtained in early adult hood and middle adulthood and above returnees (p˃0.05) as compared to their counterpart adolescences (p˂ 0.05).

Outcome variable

Age of Returnees

F

P-value*

Adolescences
(13-20 years) (n=137)

Early adulthood
(21-29 years) (n=134)

Middle Adulthood
(
30 years) (n= 105)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Intrusive thought

15.50 (5.20)

12.51(4.76)

10.98 (4.17)

28.586   

.000

Avoidance

19.46  (6.39)

16.06 (6.14)

15.09 (5.26)

18.442

.000

Hyper arousal

13.74 (4.19)

11.93 (4.05)

11.10 (3.84)

13.778

.000

Table 7 ANOVA result for the effect of returnees’ Age on PTSD dimensions
Notes: SD, standard deviation; *Significant at the 0.05 level

As can be seen from Table 8, the univariant analysis of variance result showed that returnees’ educational status had significant effect on returnees’ intrusive thought (F(2, 373)=14.020, p˂0.05), avoidance (F(2,373) =20.612, p˂0.05) and hyper arousal (F (2,373) =20.172, p˂0.05) symptoms. Furthermore, the Benferroni post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that illiterate respondents demonstrated highly significant mean difference on avoidance symptom as compared to 1-4 graders (p˂0.05), 5-8 graders(p˂0.05) and above 9 graders (p ˂ 0.05). The mean avoidance score of illiterate respondents (M=21.08, SD=5.94) was higher than 1-4 graders (M=16.73, SD=5.96), 5-8 graders (M=16.11, SD=5.95) and above 9 graders (M=14.76, SD=5.54) counter parts. Along with this, illiterate respondents demonstrated highly significant mean difference on intrusive thought symptom as compared to 1-4 graders (p˂0.05), 5-8 graders (p˂0.05) and above 9 graders (p˂0.05). The mean intrusive thought score of illiterate respondents (M=15.88, SD=4.93) was higher than 1-4 graders (M=12.89, SD=4.89), 5-8 graders (M=12.89, SD=4.89) and above 9 graders (M=11.43, SD=4.72). In addition, illiterate respondents demonstrated highly significant mean difference on hyper-arousal symptom as compared to 1-4 graders (p˂ 0.05), 5-8 graders (p˂ 0.05) and above 9 graders (p˂0.05). The mean hyper-arousal score of illiterate respondents (M=15.15, SD=3.76) was higher than 1-4 graders (M=11.74, SD=3.91), 5-8 graders (M=11.57, SD=4.04) and above 9 graders (M=11.24, SD=3.85) counter parts.

Outcome variable

Educational Status of Returnees

F

P- value

Illiterate (n=89)

Grade 1-4 (n=80)

Grade 5-8 (n=98)

Above Grade 9 (n=109)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Intrusive thought

15.88 (4.93)

12.89 (4.89)

12.89 (4.89)

11.43 (4.72)

14.020

.000

Avoidance

21.08 (5.94)

16.73 (5.96)

16.11 (5.95)

14.76 (5.54)

20.612

.000

Hyper arousal

15.15 (3.76)

11.74 (3.91)

11.57 (4.04)

11.24 (3.85)

20.172

.000

Table 8 ANOVA result for the effect of returnees’ educational Status on PTSD dimensions

As it is shown from Table 9, statistical significant mean differences were observed on respondents’ monthly income in experiencing intrusive thought (F (2,373)=64.736, p˂0.05), avoidance (F(2,373)=70.411, p˂0.05) and hyper arousal (F(2,373)=57.229, p ˂0.05) symptoms. Furthermore, the Benferroni post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that respondents with lower income demonstrated highly significant mean difference on avoidance symptom as compared to respondents with middle income (p˂0.05) and respondents with higher income (p˂0.05).The mean avoidance score of respondents with lower monthly income (M=21.20, SD=4.73) was higher than respondents with middle income (M=14.90, SD=4.90) and respondents with higher income (M=13.72, SD=5.53). Correspondingly, the Benferroni post hoc multiple comparisons also revealed that respondents with lower income demonstrated highly significant mean difference on intrusive thought and hyper-arousal symptom as compared to respondents with middle income (p ˂ 0.05) and respondents with higher income (p ˂ 0.05). As Table 7 shown, the mean intrusive thought and hyper arousal score of respondents with lower monthly income was higher than respondents with middle income and respondents with higher income.

Outcome variable

Monthly Income of Returnees

F

P- value

Lower (n=142)

Middle (n=153)

Higher (n=81)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Intrusive thought

16.45(4.50)

11.58(4.40)

10.42 (4.28)

64.736

.000

Avoidance

21.20(4.73)

14.90(4.90)

13.72(5.53)

70.411

.000

Hyper arousal

14.84(3.69)

11.30 (3.60)

9.94 (3.74)

57.229

.000

Table 9 ANOVA result for the effect of returnees’ monthly income on PTSD dimensions

As can be seen from Table 10, the univariate analysis of variance result showed that kinds of abuse returnees face had significant effect on returnees’ intrusive thought (F (2, 373)=10.409, p ˂0.05), avoidance (F (2, 373)=6.656, p ˂0.05) and hyper arousal (F (2, 373) =3.479, p˂0.05) symptoms. Furthermore, the Benferroni post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that respondents with multiple abuse demonstrated highly significant mean difference on avoidance symptom as compared to physically abused respondents (p˂ 0.05), sexually abused respondents (p˂ 0.05) and financially abused respondents (p˂0.05). The mean avoidance score of respondents with multiple abuse (M=18.47, SD=6.01) was higher than physically abused respondents (M=15.94, SD=6.00), sexually abused respondents (M=16.63, SD=6.46) and financially abused respondents (M=15.08, SD=6.30). Congruently, the post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that respondents with multiple abuse demonstrated highly significant mean difference on intrusive thought as compared to physically abused respondents (p˂ 0.05), sexually abused respondents (p˂0.05) and financially abused respondents (p ˂ 0.05). The mean intrusive thought score of respondents who were victim of multiple abuse (M=14.61, SD=5.03) was higher than physically abused respondents (M=12.29, SD=5.14), sexually abused respondents (M=12.68, SD=5.15) and financially abused respondents (M=11.13, SD=4.33). In addition, respondents who were victim of multiple abuse demonstrated highly significant mean difference on hyper-arousal symptom as compared to physically abused respondents (p˂ 0.05), sexually abused respondents (p˂ 0.05) and financially abused respondents (p ˂ 0.05). The mean hyper-arousal score of respondents with multiple abuse (M=13.01, SD=4.16) was higher than physically abused respondents (M=12.22, SD=4.16), sexually abused respondents (M=12.14, SD=4.40) and financially abused respondents (M=11.23, SD=3.89).

Outcome variable

Kinds of Abuse Returnees’ Face

F

Sig.

Physical abuse (n=66)

Sexual Abuse (n=57)

Financial Abuse (n=80)

Multiple abuse (n=173)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Intrusive thought

12.29 (5.14)

12.68 (5.15)

11.13 (4.33)

14.61(5.03)

10.409

.000

Avoidance

15.94 (6.00)

16.63 (6.46)

15.08 (6.30)

18.47 (6.01)

6.656

.000

Hyper arousal

12.21 (4.16)

12.14 (4.40)

11.23 (3.89)

13.01 (4.16)

3.479

.016

Table 10 ANOVA result for the effect of kinds of abuse returnees’ face on PTSD dimensions

Coping mechanisms used by migrant returnees

In order to measure migrant returnees’ coping mechanism, Coping Strategies Indicator was used. The mean score and one sample dependent t–test result were computed to identify the most frequently used coping mechanisms and the general nature of problem solving, seeking social support and avoidance coping mechanisms used by respondents were examined.

As can be seen in Table 11, the most frequently used coping mechanism by migrant returnees were problem-solving (M=25.57, SD=3.61), followed by seeking social support (M=23.44, SD=3.08). But avoidance (M=20.21, SD=3.37) was least used coping mechanism. In addition, the result designates that the average values of problem solving (t (376)=13.824, p< 0.05), seeking social support (t(376)=2.789, p<0.05) and avoidance t (376)=-15.996, p<0.05) were found to be statistically significant.

Variables

N

Max

Min

Mean

SD

df

 t- test Value

t

sig

Problem Solving

376

33

14

25.57

3.611

375

23.5

13.824

.000

Seeking Social Support

376

33

15

23. 44

3.088

375

24

2.789

.006

Avoidance

376

29

12

20.21

3.379

375

20.5

-15.996

.000

Table 11 Dependent t-test result for coping mechanisms used by migrant returnees

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to assess the determinant factors and the prevalence rate of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and coping mechanisms among migrant returnees in Amhara region, Ethiopia. In the present study, the general lifetime prevalence rate of post-traumatic stress disorder among migrant returnees were 26.2%. This result was supported with that of Lurie (2006) who found that the prevalence of PTSD on Ethiopian migrants in Israel was 23%. Along with this, the present finding was in accordance with Galea, Rockers, Saydee, Macauley, Varpilah & Kruk27 who found that the prevalence of PTSD in Nimba, Liberia, was high at 48.3% (n=664). Hence, this result yield consistent with previous research finding conducted by Ostrovschi et al.28 who found that PTSD was diagnosed among 35.8% of illegal migrant women in Moldova, Eastern Europe who had returned to their country of origin. However, contrary to the present study, least (5%) prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder was found among resettled Sudanese Refugees. This suggests that migrant returnees are more likely to have symptoms related to PTSD than the general population. Previous qualitative studies carried out in this population found that many Ethiopian migrant returnees from different Middle Eastern countries experience sexual, physical and emotional abuse, starvation, imprisonment, and difficulty adapting to a different culture.35 Following these experiences, migrants reported such symptoms as headache, stomachache, irritability, suicidal thoughts, pessimism and sadness.36 The present study found that the overall context of poverty was the most important reason for migration. To improve personal and family life situation/living standard, search for better life and better paying job, failure to succeed in educational endeavors, poverty of family and poor life situation, unemployment, failure to succeed in educational endeavors were additional factors. The present study finding was consistently pertinent with many previous research findings in Ethiopia such as Emebet,8 Asefach,13 Agrinet,37 ILO,20 IOM19 and Bezabih.38 In this study, migrant returnees reported various traumatic events that can be the cause for PTSD. With this regard, confiscation of documents, limitations on freedom of movement, verbal abuse, threaten to impose even worse working condition, excessive working hours (>8) were highly reported problem. In addition, imprisonment, withholding of wage and life threatening trial were also common problems highly reported by domestic migrants. Hence, sexual harassment by employers, robbery, bribe, denial of access to food, enforced cultural isolation and enforcement to engage in commercial sex, drug and alcohol trafficking were reported by some migrant returnees. The result of this study was supported by various similar previous researches8−52 who found that physical and sexual assault, labor exploitation, withholding and/or denial of salary, sleep deprivation, confinement, insult and belittlement were the most prevalent form of abuse and exploitation faced by Ethiopians victims of human trafficking in the gulf region. In this study, the mean score of PTSD for female respondents were higher than male respondent. This study yields a consistent result with previous research findings including Anbesse B et al.22, Emebet K,8 Alem A et al.;39 Amare D40 and Kebede D et al.41 This is because of different social, cultural, religious and economic conditions that are directly related to gender issues. Moreover, PTSD is highly observed among females than males in Middle East this is because female migrant workers are at a high risk of physical, sexual and verbal abuse.35,36 Furthermore, Tsutsumi, et al.42 in Nipal reported a higher prevalence of PTSD (45%) among trafficked female migrants for labor exploitation than males. The study also suggested significantly increased risk of PTSD among women who had been trafficked for sexual exploitation compared with women who had been trafficked for labor exploitation. Moreover, the present study finding was also pertinent with Rasmussen, Rosenfeld, Reeves & Keller.43 It indicated that gender was significantly associated with PTSD and PTSD was 2.5 times greater for women than men. In addition to this, Ostrovschi et al.28 indicated that at an average of 6 months post-return in Moldova, over half (54.2%) of the women survivors of migrants in the study met DSM-IV criteria for mental disorder. 38% of women had PTSD than men. Moreover, an earlier study conducted by Zimmerman et al.44 that explored the mental health of migrant sex workers awaiting deportation in Israel reported that 17% had symptoms of PTSD. A study done by Derogatis & Savitz45 in Greece found that women who were victims of trafficking had a higher risk of developing PTSD than did other abused women.

In this study, a multi variant analysis of variance result showed that age of the respondents had found higher significant effect on the PTSD dimensions which supports findings from previous studies.26−47 However, the present study finding was contradicted with the findings of previous studies, Ostrovschi et al.28 and Rasmussen et al.43 who found that the age of migrant returnees is negatively associated with PTSD. In the present study, significant multivariate main effects for educational level of the respondents on PTSD dimensions were found. This result yields consistence with Aragona et al.23 However, this studyfinding was inconsistent with study finding of Rasmussen et al.48 The combination of low education and gender inequality has been exposed many migrant returnees to poor mental health status. Even though migration as domestic worker to the Middle East adversely impacts the mental health status of both men and women, it seems that traditional gender values still play an important role in everyday life of women and that the overload of responsibilities and expectations on them has a directly devastating impact on their mental health, especially if they do not have strong social support during their stay in the destination country and after they return. Previous research documented that multiple complications like physical, sexual and emotional abuse, salary denial, and violation of expectations each contribute to the decline in mental health of domestic work migrant returnees.22−50 In this study, income of migrant returnees in Middle East countries had significant effect on PTSD dimensions. This result was consistent with the finding of Lindert et al.51 who found that lower socioeconomic status of immigrants were associated with higher mental illness particularly PTSD. However, the present study result yields inconsistence with previous research findings of Massimiliano et al.52 and Abas et al.53

MANOVA result of this study illustrated that types of abuse returnees’ face had significant multivariate main effect on PTSD dimensions. Respondents who were victims of multiple abuse had demonstrated highly significant mean differences on PTSD score as compared to their counterpart who were victims of physical (p˂0.05), sexual (p˂0.05) and financial abused respondents (p˂0.05). The finding of the present study yields pertinent with the previous study conducted by Eisenman, et al.54 and Silove et al.55 Ethiopian men and women trafficked to the Middle East countries suffer from recurrent physical and emotional abuse by employers.8−14 The most common forms of physical abuse were beating and corporal punishment inflicted by the female and male employers, although abuse by agents and the police had also been reported.52 Emotional abuse is the most common and humiliating type of the abuse for women domestic workers.52 The types of traumatic event determine the degree of returnees’ trauma. Higher prevalence rate of PTSD were found among currently unemployed respondents than currently employed respondents. The difference was statistically significant. Previous research results were in line with the present research findings.28,47,57

In present study, the most frequently used coping mechanism by respondents was problem-solving, seeking social support and avoidance coping mechanism respectively. This result was in line with Araya et al.58 and Emmelkamp,32 who found higher levels of endorsement of problem solving coping mechanisms to deal PTSD in migrants from culturally traditional countries. Congruently, Selvira D59 also found pertinent finding with the present study which demonstrated that social support as one of coping strategies most often used by Bosnian immigrants in Switzerland. Spiritual sources of coping were found to be an important coping mechanism among East African migrants in Australia.29,60

Conclusion

In this study, the majority of respondents believe that the overall context of poverty was the foremost factor for migrating to the Middle East for there is little chance for a better life in Ethiopia. Cognizant of that, to improve personal and family life situation/living standard, to search for better life and better paying job, to failure to succeed in educational endeavors, poverty of family and poor life situation and unemployment were the most frequently reported factors that enforce migrants to migrate in Middle East countries. In the process of pre, during and post migration, migrant returnees were highly exposed for inhuman exploitation and coercion in the Middle East that could be the cause for developing severe post-traumatic stress disorder. Besides, returnees were deported after experiencing various traumatic events. In this study, hazardous working and living conditions, constant control of movement, unbearable workload, imprisonment, confiscation of documents, denial of wages, life threatening trial, sexual abuse, financial abuse, physical abuse were highly reported factors for experiencing PTSD of migrant returnees. Due to this, the life time prevalence rate of PTSD were very high. Even higher prevalence rate of PTSD were found among single, illiterate, returnees with lower income, currently unemployed, a victim of multiple abuse and female adolescence migrant returnees. On top of that, statistical significant differences were found in experiencing PTSD full scale and PTSD dimensions across migrant returnees’ sex, age, educational status, average monthly income, types of abuse they face and current employment status after deportation. Regarding to coping mechanisms, problem solving, seeking social support and avoidance were highly used respectively to deal with the traumatic events.

Recommendation

Based on the result of the study, the following recommendations shall be implemented by responsible stakeholders of the region as well as the federal government of Ethiopia. Mental health service providers shall consider in diagnosing and treating Post-traumatic stress disorder among migrant returnees. The psychosocial service shall be taken place in all Zones and Woredas in Amhara region where migrant returnees have been leading their life. All concerned governmental, non-governmental and civil society stakeholders shall work hand in hand to improve the migrant returnees’ mental health problem. Congruently, both governmental and non-governmental organizations (including migrant returnees) of Amhara region shall raise awareness among the potential victims on the possibilities to work in their own country and about all the range of dangers to the destination countries. Furthermore, using all available means and media outlets, the governmental and non-governmental organizations shall show the available domestic work opportunities and possibilities of changing one’s own life in the country for the young generations. In this regard, the private and public press shall also work in partnership with the government in advertising the available and potential domestic job opportunities and encourage the young generation to improve their work habits and entrepreneurship skills. In line with this, governmental and nongovernmental organizations that are currently working on job-creation for migrant returnees within the country need to extend their vision to include returnees in their income generating projects. Lack of assistance turns yesterday’s returnees into today’s victims of trafficking. In addition, the regional government has to strengthen the existing piece of movement in all Zones and Woredas to reintegrate migrant returnees with the society. Additionally, regional government in collaboration with researchers, policy makers and entrepreneurs shall develop the structured system that enable them sustainably carry out very important goals relation to migrants. Most importantly, local and international smugglers and traffickers shall be brought to the law and severely punished for their acts to discourage others from engaging in the same illegal activity. Society at large should cooperate with law executive bodies to identify traffickers and bring them to justice. Stricter laws and policies should be put in place and the public made aware of the existence of such laws.

Limitation and future implication

In conducting this study, the usage of a structured instrument, trained data collectors and supervised field workers to collect data from randomly selected migrant returnees decreases the likelihood of the occurrence of bias in the study. However, there were two limitations. First, although the Amharic version of the instrument had revealed good reliability and feasibility, it was too hard to be quite sure that the translated tool had been retained their original psychometric properties in different cultural backgrounds of the study sites. Second, the finding was not supported by similar locally available researches on migrant returnees’ PTSD. Due to this, it is difficult to generalize for other contexts. Along with this, the finding of this research implied as further research shall be conducted on the following four areas; first, Post-traumatic stress disorder often coexists with other psychological disorders such as depression disorder, anxiety disorders, somatization and substance abuse. Second, still the qualitative study has to be conducted about the experience of victims in the destination countries, way of trafficking, the problem they face particularly illegal migrants at the boarder of Yemen. Third, replication of this study with a larger and representative sample size would be beneficial to see if similar results are found. The larger the sample size, the greater the credibility and generalizability to the target population. Finally, studies on psychosocial issues of families left behind and migrant’s resilience power shall be surveyed.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Glossary on Migration: International Migration Law. Geneva: International Organization for Migration. 2004.
  2. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Human Development Report 2009 Statistics. 2009a.
  3. Ghanem TWhen Forced Migrants Return ‘Home’: The Psychosocial Difficulties Returnees Encounter in the Reintegration Process. Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; St. Giles; 2007.
  4. Krupinski J. Changing patterns of migration to Australia and their influence on the health of migrants. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(11):927−937.
  5. Hareven T. Families, History and Social Change: Life Course and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Boulder, Colo, Westview Press; 2000.
  6. Human Rights Watch. World Report 2012. Country Summary Ethiopia, New York: Human Rights Watch. 2002.
  7. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). African Women’s Report 2009: Measuring Gender Inequality in Africa: 2009.
  8. Emebet K. Ethiopia: An Assessment of The International Labor Migration Situation the Case of Female Labor Migrants. Geneva, Switzerland; 2001.
  9. Adnew T. Trafficking of Human Beings: With Special Emphasis on the Problem of Ethiopian Women Trafficking to the Middle East. Department of Political Science and International Relations, Addis Ababa University; 2003.
  10. Beyene J. Women, Migration and Housing: A Case Study of Three Households of Ethiopian and Eritrean Female Migrant Workers in Beirut and Naba’a. Masters’ Thesis American University of Beirut; 2005.
  11. De Regt M. Ethiopian women in the middle east: The case of migrant domestic workers in Yemen, paper for the African studies center seminar, school for social science research, University of Amsterdam; 2007.
  12. Glossary on Migration: International Migration Law. Geneva: International Organization for Migration; 2004.
  13. Asefach H. An Investigation into the Experiences of Female Victims of Traffic in Ethiopia. Department of Psychology. University of South Africa; 2012.
  14. Selamawit Bekele W. The Vulnerability of Ethiopian rural Women and Girls, Uppsala University; 2013.
  15. US department of State. Trafficking in persons report. 2012.
  16. Meskerem M. Psychosocial and Economic Experiences of Gulf States Returnee Ethiopian Women Domestic Workers, Addis Ababa; 2012.
  17. Gebeyehu B. Ethiopian Women Labor Migrants to the Middle East: Perceived Causes,   Social Influences and Level of Readiness. Department of Social Psychology, School of Graduate Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa. Ethiopia; 2012.
  18. Esubalew A. Ethiopian female migration to Middle East countries: Evidence from return migrants. University of Regensberg, Germany; 2010.
  19. Migrant Well-Being in the Middle East and North Africa: A Focus on Gender in Cairo. Geneva, Switzerland; 2009.
  20. Trafficking in persons overseas for labour purposes. The case of Ethiopian domestic workers. ILO Country Office Addis Ababa. International Labor Organization;2011.
  21. Migration Initiatives 2013 in Support of Development. Geneva, Switzerland; 2013.
  22. Anbesse B, Hanlon C, Alem A, et al. Migration and mental health: A study of low-income Ethiopian women working in Middle Eastern countries. International Journal of social Psychiatry. 2009;55:557−568.
  23. Aragona, Daniela, Mazzetti, et al. Traumatic events, post-migration living difficulties and post-traumatic symptoms in first generation immigrants: a primary care study. Ann Ist Super Sanità. 2013;49(2):169−175.
  24. Zahid J, Kabete. The Costs of Mass Deportation Impractical, Expensive, and New York, America. Madura Wijewardena; 2010.
  25. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. 2000.
  26. Frouws B. Migrant Smuggling in the Horn of Africa & Yemen: the social economy and protection risks. Nairobi, Kenya; 2013.
  27. Lurie I. Psychiatric Care in Restricted Conditions for Work Migrants, Refugees and Asylum Seekers: Experience of the Open Clinic for Work Migrants and Refugees, Israel Shalvata Mental Health Center, Hod Hasharon, Israel;2006.
  28. Galea S, Rockers P, Saydee G, et al. Persistent psychopathology in the wake of civil war: long-term posttraumatic stress disorder in Nimba, County, Liberia. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1745−1751.
  29. Ostrovschi N, Prince M, Zimmerman C, et al. Women in post trafficking services in Moldova: diagnostic interviews over two time periods to assess returning women’s mental health. BMC Public Health. 2011;14:232.
  30. Kenneth JR, Kevin DB, Joseph RS, et al. Psychometric Properties of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version: J Trauma Stress. 2003;16(5):495−502.
  31. Ennis S. Religion, Spirituality, and the Refugee Experience (PhD thesis). School of Global Studies, Social Science, and Planning, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia; 2011.
  32. Emmelkamp J, Komproe IH, Van Ommeren M, et al. The relation between coping, social support, and psychological and somatic symptoms among torture survivors in Nepal. Psychological Medicine. 2002;32(8):1465–1470.
  33. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, et al. The PTSD checklist: reliability, validity, & diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, TX. 1993.
  34. Blanchard EB, Jones Alexander J, Buckley TC, et al. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behav Res Ther. 1996;34(8):669−673.
  35. Amirkhan JH. A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The Coping Strategy Indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;59(5):1066–1074.
  36. Utsey SO, Ponterotto JG, Reynolds AL, et al. Racism and discrimination, coping, life satisfaction, and self-esteem among African Americans. Journal of Counseling and Development. 2000;78(1):72–80.
  37. Desmond, Shevlin M, MacLachlan M. Dimensional analysis of the coping strategy indicator in a sample of elderly veterans with acquired limb amputations. Personality and Individual Differences. 2006;40(2):249–259.
  38. Arnold F, Shah N. Asian Labor Migration to the Middle East. Int Migration Rev. 1984;18 (2):294−318.
  39. Gurung G, Adhikari J. The prospects and Problems of Foreign Labor Migration; In: Ahn P, editor. Migrants Workers and Human Rights, Out Migration from South Asia. ILO; 2001:101−130.
  40. Assessment of the magnitude of women and children trafficked within and outside of Ethiopia. International Organization for Migration. 2004:1−46.
  41. Bezabih T. Trafficking of women and children to Alert area in Addis Ababa for Sexual Exploitation. Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2008.
  42. Alem A, Kebede D, Woldesemiat G, et al. The prevalence and socio demographic correlates of mental distress in Butajira, Ethiopia. Acta Psychiatry Scand Suppl. 1999;397:48−55.
  43. Amare D. Awareness and attitude towards common mental health problems, Agaro town, South Western Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences. 2005;15(2):1−19.
  44. Zimmerman C, Hossain M, Yun K, et al. The health of trafficked women: a survey of women entering posttrafficking services in Europe. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(1):55–59.
  45. Derogatis L, Savitz K. The SCL-90-R and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in primary In: Maruish M, editor. Handbook of Psychological Assessment in Primary Care Settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. disorders, Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 2000;37:241–249.
  46. Kebede D, Alem A, Rashid E. The prevalence and socio demographic correlates of mental distress in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1999;397:5−10.
  47. Tsutsumi A, Izutsu T, Poudyal A, et al. Mental health of female survivors of human trafficking in Nepal. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:1841–1847.
  48. Rasmussen A, Rosenfeld B, Reeves K, et al. The Subjective Experience of Trauma and Subsequent PTSD in a Sample of Undocumented Immigrants. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007;195(2):137−143.
  49. Veling W, Hoek H, Selten J, et al. Age at migration and future risk of psychotic disorders among immigrants in the Netherlands: a 7-year incidence study. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1278−1285.
  50. Abebaw M. Experiences of trafficking returnee domestic workers from the Gulf States: Implications for policy and intervention. Addis Ababa University. 2011.
  51. Lindert J, Brähler E, Wittig U, et al. Depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorders in labor migrants, asylum seekers and refugees. A systematic overview. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2008;58(3-4):109−122.
  52. Massimiliano A, Daniela P, Mazzetti M, et al. Traumatic events, post-migration living difficulties and post traumatic symptoms in first generation immigrants: a primary care study Caritas Health Service Network, Rome, Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2013;49(2):169−175.
  53. Abas M, Ostrovschi N Prince, Gorceag M, et al. Risk factors for mental disorders in women survivors of human trafficking: a historical cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:204.
  54. Eisenman D, Gelberg L, Liu H, et al. Mental health and health-related quality of life among adult Latino primary care patients living in the United States with previous exposure to political violence. JAMA. 2003;290(5):627−34.
  55. Silove D, Steel Z, McGorry P, et al. Trauma exposure, post migration stressors, and symptoms of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress in Tamil asylum-seekers: comparison with refugees and immigrants. Acta Psychiatric Scand. 1998;97(3):175−181.
  56. Yoseph Endashaw, Mebratu Gebeyehu, Belete Reta. Assessment of trafficking in women and children in and from Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: IOM. 2006.
  57. Farley M, Barkan H. Prostitution, violence, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Women Health. 1998;27(3):37−49.
  58. Araya M, Chotai, J, Komproe IH, et al. Effect of trauma on quality of life as mediated by mental distress and moderated by coping and social support among post conflict displaced Ethiopians. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16(6):915–927.
  59. Selvira D. Mental health and coping strategies of Bosnian immigrants in Switzer land, International University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2011;10(2):195–202.
  60. Ethiopia: Saudi Arabia Returnees Snapshot; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2014.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2019 Zewdu, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.