Review Article Volume 15 Issue 1
Assistant Professor, Psychology at Mahatma Gandhi State Institute of Public Administration, India
Correspondence: Nayanika Singh, Assistant Professor, Psychology at Mahatma Gandhi State Institute of Public Administration, Sector-26, Chandigarh, Government of Punjab, India
Received: January 06, 2024 | Published: January 19, 2024
Citation: Singh N. Developing psychological safety in organizations. J Psychol Clin Psychiatry. 2024;15(1):9-11. DOI: 10.15406/jpcpy.2024.15.00754
In the modern -day world of work, there has been a paradigm shift from hiring employees in organizations who are just academically intelligent to employees who are emotionally balanced and intelligent. Leadership of the 21st century essentially demands a leader to be emotionally intelligent and empathetic and at the same time a manager who can steer the best potential of their team and provide them with an environment that is psychologically safe yet motivating. According to Edmondson1 psychological safety is defined as when members engage in any risky action in a team, the implementation of these actions is safe, can be accepted by colleagues. Taking this backdrop into consideration, the aim of the present paper is to highlight and discuss the various techniques and strategies that can be used in present day organizations to foster a psychologically safe and enriched work environment.
Keywords: psychological safety, organizations, work environment, strategies
In the modern-day world of work, there has been a paradigm shift from hiring employees in organizations who are just academically intelligent to employees who are emotionally balanced and intelligent. An employee may be a ninety percenter, but may lack skills and competencies to manage and regulate his or her own emotions and those of others. This may impact his/her own performance and that of getting work done from others in a big way, impacting the overall climate and productivity of the organization. Leadership of the 21st century essentially demands a leader to be emotionally intelligent and empathetic and at the same time a manager who can steer the best potential of their team and provide them with an environment that is psychologically safe yet motivating.
Creating an environment of psychological safety assists in facilitating behaviour that is adaptive and encouraging since it reduces excessive concern about others' reactions to actions that have the potential for embarrassment or threat, which are generally a part of any growing organization.1 A psychologically safe environment helps employees to satisfy their curious gut through seeking feedback, sharing information, asking for help, talking about errors, innovating and experimenting.1
The term Psychological safety was incepted by Harvard professor Dr. Amy Edmondson in 1999. According to Edmondson1 psychological safety is defined as when members engage in any risky action in a team, the implementation of these actions is safe, can be accepted by colleagues. It is the belief that you won’t be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes. In other words, it means to “brainstorm aloud”.2
It is indicated that a psychologically safe environment occurs where:
Brown & Leigh3 suggest that the inception of psychological safety occurs form the individual level and then travels to the level of the entire organization. It includes employees' perceptions about organizational environment characteristics such as: the support of management, clear job roles and freedom for self-expression.3
According to a study on the Google Aristotle Project psychological safety was the most crucial factor governing a successful team. The reasons for the same are attributed to factors such as better employee engagement and decision making, enhanced creativity and innovation, lower attrition rates, improved team cooperation, collaboration and well-being and fostering a culture of inclusivity, productivity and growth.4 However, research indicates that there are many factors that may contribute towards an employees psychological safety that are enlisted below:
Taking this backdrop into consideration, the aim of the present paper is to highlight and discuss the various techniques and strategies that can be used in present day organizations to foster a psychologically safe and enriched work environment.
Techniques & strategies to develop a psychologically safe environment
Post the global pandemic, it has become rather imperative for organizations to provide its employees with an environment that is physically conducive, psychologically and interpersonally nurtured and organizationally cooperative. According to Clark5 Psychological safety develops in four major stages which are as follows:
Stages of psychological safety |
Description |
Inclusion Safety |
Feels wanted and accepted by others. Creates a culture of mutual respect, freedom to voice opinions, respect diversity and encourage inclusivity. |
Learner Safety |
Does not fear punishment while making mistakes and taking risks. Creates a culture of freedom for, learning, experimenting and risk taking. |
Contributor Safety |
Feels comfortable to share ideas and opinions without fear. Creates a culture where individuals are valued, empowered and motivated to make use of their skills and talent. |
Challenger Safety |
Feels comfortable in questioning and challenging status quo and speaking up about issues and concerns. Encourages to develop a democratic and participative culture with alternatives for consistent improvement. |
Keeping this in mind various techniques and strategies to build and cultivate the culture of psychological safety in organizations will be covered under three broad headings which are as follows:
Physically conducive environment: Organizations should provide employees with a positive and productive work ergonomics to enhance professional and personal productivity since there is positive relationship between a more physically comfortable work environment and greater psychological safety. These can be enhanced by using the following techniques:
Psychologically & interpersonally nurtured environment: Edmondson described psychological safety as the “absence of interpersonal fear.” In order to attain this absence of interpersonal fear, organizations must maintain employee engagement by helping people feel comfortable and building the shared belief that the team is safe for risk-taking.6 According to a research conducted by the State of Talent Optimization Report, one in four companies consider psychological safety as the most significant factor for the retention of employees in organizations.6 Some psychological and interpersonal strategies can be incorporated in organizations to nurture psychological safety are as follows:
Organizationally cooperative environment
Life blood and sustainability of organizations does not lie in its buildings and structures, rather in its ability to meld different components steered through a power packed and motivated human resource. This can be achieved through creating an environment of mutual trust, respect, cooperation and synergy. One such example that comes to my mind is the world’s leading automobile giant Toyota Motor Corporation headquartered in Japan.
Toyota uses its corporate culture to maximize human resource capabilities in innovation, motivating workers to adopt effective problem-solving behavior, Personal magnetism, humility, teamwork, continuous improvement through learning, persistence and resilience that acts as adhesive strength to nurture a cooperative culture.7
Some strategies that can be incorporated to create a cooperative environment in organizations to foster psychological safety are as follows:
In today’s highly competitive and uncertain world of work where technology is virtually driving the human resource, I would like to end my article by quoting Joseph Fahrney’s post on Linkedin, “Psychological safety is crucial in nurturing a healthy organizational environment, enhancing individual well-being, and enabling the free exchange of ideas. It shapes the perceived consequences of interpersonal risk-taking.”
None.
Neither author has any conflict of interest.
No funding was received for this study.
©2024 Singh. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.