Journal of
eISSN: 2373-6445
Submit manuscript...
Opinion Authors String Book Reviews - VIII
Baby Lives Matter!!!!!
Samuel A Nigro M D
Verify Captcha
Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.
Verify Captcha
Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.
Retired, Assistant Clinical Professor Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, USA
Correspondence: Dr. Samuel A Nigro M.D., Retired, Assistant Clinical Professor Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2517 Guilford Road, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44118, USA, Tel 216 932-0575
Received: November 11, 2015 | Published: June 2, 2016
Citation: Nigro SA (2016) Baby Lives Matter!!!!!. J Psychol Clin Psychiatry 6(1): 00320. DOI: 10.15406/jpcpy.2016.06.00320
Opinion
Mom, you have the RIGHT to have your child--Do NOT kill your baby.
Make your CHOICE about getting pregnant and let the baby choose too.
Be part of evolution and let your natural selections live.
About The Unborn Child: (Everyone has the RIGHT TO A NATURAL DEATH)
To kill a human DNA microscopic unique creature during a dignifying universal environmental phase of existence which every human creature had to go through, in these days of microsurgery, tool miniaturization, nanotechnology, molecule identification, and chemical manipulation is indefensible rationalizing, is sinful self-injurious failure to accept responsibility for one’s own choices and actions, and is a pagan sinful primitive murder not belonging in the 21st century. “Created equal” (where did that come from), the human DNA creature deserves the same chances you and I had when we were there. The Constitution states it is for "posterity" which must include the unborn. A human creature’s existence should not be the willful choice of another human DNA creature. To destroy the destiny of another is a psychopathic outrage. And to force physicians to do this is slavery against the 14th and 8th amendments. There is no reason judges, attorneys, editors and politicians could not do the abortions themselves—let them do it. Hell, let the baby’s father do it—and save health care dollars—Planned Parenthood can have a walk-in, do-it-yourself low cost program. And to promote embryonic stem cell research is nothing but contemporary cannibalism.
In addition, PERSONHOOD is not just “self-awareness” but “self-awareness squared” or “conscious of consciousness” or C2 --the ability to know beyond simple awareness and therefore one knows that one knows. This is a unique quality of humans which separates them from subhuman animals. This “aware of being aware” is innately pro-self and pro-species, in both biochemical and psychological senses. FROM THE MOMENT OF CONCEPTION, the biochemical developmental forces are undeniably self-aware/self-developing for oneself and for the species! (and this is intrinsic to the human DNA creature). These developmental forces, biological and psychological, for awareness of being aware (C2) are what constitute personhood when transcendentally intact i.e., the forces are confluent with matter, identity, truth, oneness, good and beauty—what one is “through (per) the sound (sonare).” Such personhood is present from the moment of conception because normal developing biochemistry makes it so just as the biochemistry makes it so when we are asleep, comatose, intoxicated or anesthetized.
Any one who has stopped being pro-self/pro-species has depersonalized himself and has likely lost C2—and the most common occurrence of that are abortionists and all who believe in abortion, and thereby have become without personhood themselves.
Thus those for abortion should be asked if they would object to being aborted themselves when the time was right for it.
Finally, EVOLUTION (if you believe in it), is totally rejected by abortion (and contraception for that matter). If LIFE is the result of the random reproductive process and the natural selection of new adaptations, to kill the unborn and use contraception are insane anti-evolutionary acts totally incompatible with species advancement consistent with life development up to now. Against evolution, both contraception and abortion are public health hazards.
Acknowledgments
None.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
©2016 Nigro. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.