Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2379-6359

Otolaryngology-ENT Research

Short Communication Volume 7 Issue 3

The Rationale behind a Continous Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Machine that Approximates the Nasal Cycle during Sleep

Jim Bartley,1,2 David E White3

1Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Counties District Health Board, New Zealand
2Department of Surgery University of Auckland, New Zealand
3School of Engineering Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand

Correspondence: Jim Bartley Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Counties District Health Board 19 Lambie Drive Auckland 2104, New Zealand, Tel (+64) 9 6310475

Received: February 22, 2017 | Published: May 16, 2017

Citation: Bartley JMD, White ME (2017) The Rationale behind a Continous Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Machine That Approximates the Nasal Cycle during Sleep. J Otolaryngol ENT Res 7(3): 00202. DOI: 10.15406/joentr.2017.07.00202

Download PDF

Abstract

Normal nasal airflow alternates in dominance between the two nostrils with an ultradian rhythm called the “nasal cycle.” The nasal cycle is thought to enable the patent airway to perform the majority of the air-conditioning functions, while the congested side undergoes a period of recovery. Nasal-applied continuous positive airway pressure (n-CPAP) forces air equally up both sides of the nose disrupting the nasal cycle, which could contribute to nasal side-effects, such as nasal dryness, crusting and congestion. The development of a n-CPAP machine, which approximates physiological alternating nasal airflow during sleep, could reduce nasal side effects and improve n-CPAP adherence. A n-CPAP mask would need modification so that air under pressure could be independently directed to and received from each side of the nose. The system would allow for the pre-setting of both the nasal cycle duration time and the degree of airflow partitioning between each naris. A n-CPAP machine that approximates the normal physiological nasal cycle during sleep could reduce the incidence of adverse nasal symptoms and improve sleep quality leading to improved n-CPAP compliance.

Keywords: cpap, nasal cycle, nasal airflow partitioning, obstructive sleep apnoea

Abbreviations

n-CPAP, nasal-applied continuous positive airway pressure; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

Introduction

Normal nasal airflow alternates in dominance through the two nostrils with an ultradian physiological rhythm called the “nasal cycle.” Nasal-applied continuous positive airway pressure (n-CPAP), the clinical “gold standard” for the treatment of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA),1 forces air under pressure down both sides of the nose. During awake breathing, n-CPAP disrupts normal inter-nasal airflow partitioning.2 During sleep, n-CPAP could potentially alter the nasal cycle, disturbing the nose’s normal air conditioning functions.

Nasal cycle

Normally, the airflow and resistance in each nasal airway alternates between a patent and partially congested state for periods ranging from 25minutes to greater than 4hours, with a mean of 2.5hours.3‒5 Some evidence suggests that the nasal cycle is longer during sleep compared to the waking state.3,5,6 During sleep, changes in the nasal cycle often coincide with postural changes and may occur more often in transitions to REM sleep.5‒7

Eccles3 has proposed that the nasal cycle enables cells and glands on the congested side to rest and recover.8 The nasal cycle probably controls the balance between the fluxes of heat and water vapour required to condition the inspired air, and the ability of nasal blood flow and mucus secretion to supply sufficient heat and water to the surface tissue.9 White et al.,10 has shown that the nasal cycle allows the anterior conducting airways to cope with the conflicting demands of air-conditioning and mucus clearance.10

The nasal cycle is related to REM and non-REM sleep.7,11 Greater left hemisphere EEG power is coupled to REM sleep, and greater right hemisphere EEG power is coupled to non-REM stage 4 sleep.12 In conscious people, greater EEG power is exhibited in the hemisphere contralateral to the nostril with the dominant airflow.13,14 In awake people, unilateral forced nostril breathing leads to selective unilateral activation of the opposing cerebral hemisphere.4 By forcing air under pressure equally down both sides of the nose during sleep, n-CPAP could potentially affect brain wave activity and sleep quality.

Nasal-applied continuous positive airway pressure

Despite n-CPAP’s efficacy and substantial benefits, long-term n-CPAP adherence rates remain low.15,16 Numerous reasons for suboptimal patient n-CPAP adherence have been explored.15‒17 The mask-nose interface, the discomfort of breathing against pressure and the irritation of pressurised air in the nose might all contribute to low n-CPAP adherence.1,17‒21 Up to 65% of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) suffers receiving n-CPAP report adverse nasal symptoms such as a dry nose, nasal congestion, nasal crusting, rhinorrhoea, epistaxis and sneezing.17,19,22‒25

Modifications to improve n-CPAP compliance have included improved humidification and CPAP pressure adjustments. Heated humidification decreases nasal symptomatology and mucosal inflammation,19,23 however the current evidence supporting the routine use of humidification to improve CPAP compliance is minimal19‒21,26,27 Delivery pressures have been adjusted in order to improve patient comfort.19,21 Pressure reduction on exhalation (BiPAP) and auto-adjusting PAP has been trialled. No adherence improvement, change in the apnoea-hypopnea index or daytime sleepiness with BiPAP has been found.21,26 With auto-adjusting PAP, the pressure changes in response to changes in airflow, respiratory events, and snoring throughout the night. Pressure reduction does not dramatically improve adherence.19‒21,26,28,29

The nasal cycle appears important in the air conditioning functions of the nose and n-CPAP appears to disturb normal inter-nasal airflow partitioning in conscious subjects.2 Modification of current n-CPAP technology to approximate normal nasal physiology during sleep would seem an option worth exploring.

Modifying a n-CPAP machine

A n-CPAP mask would need modification so that air could be directed to and received independently from each side of the nose. A n-CPAP machine would need modification so that the patent nasal airway could be detected and receive an initial higher air pressure than the congested nasal airway during the inhalation phase of breathing during sleep initiation. During exhalation, the patent nasal airway would have to receive a lower pressure than the congested nasal airway to maintain appropriate airflow partitioning. The system would have to allow for the pre-setting of both the nasal cycle duration time and the degree of airflow partitioning between each naris.

Conclusion

N-CPAP is an effective treatment for OSA, but long-term n-CPAP adherence rates remain low.15,16 Unfortunately recent n-CPAP humidification and pressure modifications have not dramatically improved patient compliance. An n-CPAP machine that approximates the normal nasal cycle restoring normal nasal respiratory physiological processes could reduce the incidence of adverse nasal symptoms leading to improved n-CPAP compliance.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

Two of the authors (JRB and DEW) are patent holders in a CPAP device designed to approximate the nasal cycle during sleep. Patent Number 617543, a Patient Interface and Method of Treating Sleep Apnoea. New Zealand: Intellectual Property Office.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Phillips B, Kryger M. Management of obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnea syndrome. In: Kryger MH, et al. (Editors.), Principles and practice of sleep medicine (5th edn), St Louis, USA. 2011. p. 1278‒1293.
  2. White DE, Bartley J, Shakeel M, et al. Nasal airway responses to nasal continuous positive airway pressure breathing: an in-vivo pilot study. J Biomech. 2016;49(9):1887‒1890.
  3. Eccles R. Nasal airflow in health and disease. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120(5):580‒595.
  4. Shannahoff-Khalsa D. Psychophysiological states: the ultradian dynamics of mind-body interactions. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2008;80:1‒220.
  5. Kahana-Zweig R, Geva-Sagiv M, Weissbrod A, et al. Measuring and characterizing the human nasal cycle. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):0162918e.
  6. Atanasov A. Length of periods in the nasal cycle during 24-hours registration. Open Journal of Biophysics. 2011;4:93‒96.
  7. Kimura A, Chiba S, Capasso R, et al. Phase of nasal cycle during sleep tends to be associated with sleep stage. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(8):2050‒2055.
  8. Eccles R. Neurological and pharmacological considerations. In: Proctor DF & Andersen I (Eds.), The nose: upper airway physiology and the atmospheric environment, Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, USA. 1982. p.191‒214.
  9. Elad D, Wolf M, Keck T. Air-conditioning in the human nasal cavity. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008;163(1-3):121‒127.
  10. White DE, Bartley J, Nates RJ. Model demonstrates functional purpose of the nasal cycle. Biomed Eng Online. 2015;14(1):38.
  11. Atanasov A, Dimov P, Dimitrov B. Time periods in the nasal cycle during night sleep. Biological Rhythm Research. 2003;34(4):355‒366.
  12. Shannahoff-Khalsa DS, Gillin JC, Yates FE, et al. Ultradian rhythms of alternating cerebral hemispheric EEG dominance are coupled to rapid eye movement and non-rapid eye movement stage 4 sleep in humans. Sleep Med. 2001;2(4):333‒346.
  13. Shannahoff-Khalsa D. The ultradian rhythm of alternating cerebral hemispheric activity. Int J Neurosci. 1993;70(3-4):285‒298.
  14. Shannahoff-Khalsa DS, Yates FE. Ultradian sleep rhythms of lateral EEG, autonomic, and cardiovascular activity are coupled in humans. Int J Neurosci. 2000; 101(1-4):21‒43.
  15. Wozniak DR, Lasserson TJ, Smith I. Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Re. 2014;8(1):CD007736.
  16. Weaver TE . Don’t start celebrating-CPAP adherence remains a problem. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013;9(6):551‒552.
  17. Lasters F, Mallegho C, Boudewyns A, et al. Nasal symptoms in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and their impact on therapeutic compliance with continuous positive airway pressure. Acta Clin Belg. 2014;69(2):87‒91.
  18. Engleman HM, Wild MR. Improving CPAP use by patients with the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS). Sleep Med Rev. 2003;7(1):81‒99.
  19. Weaver TE, Grunstein RR. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: the challenge to effective treatment. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):173‒178.
  20. Buchanan P, Grunstein RR.Positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea. In: Kryger MH, et al. (Eds.), Principles and practice of sleep medicine (5th edn), Elsevier, St Louis, USA. 2011. p.1233‒1249.
  21. Donovan LM, Boeder S, Malhotra A, et al. New developments in the use of positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(8):1323‒1342.
  22. Richards GN, Cistulli PA, Ungar RG, et al. Mouth leak with nasal continuous positive airway pressure increases nasal airway resistance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(1):182‒186.
  23. Koutsourelakis I, Vagiakis E, Perraki E, et al. Nasal inflammation in sleep apnoea patients using CPAP and effect of heated humidification. Eur Respir J . 2011;37(3):587‒594.
  24. Malik N, Kenyon G. Changes in the nasal airway mucosa and in nasal symptoms following continuous positive airway pressure (n-CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnoea. Australian Journal of Oto-Laryngology. 2004;7(1):17‒20.
  25. Mador MJ, Krauza M, Pervez A, et al. Effect of heated humidification on compliance and quality of life in patients with sleep apnea using nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Chest . 2005;128(4):2151‒2158.
  26. Smith I, Lasserson TJ. Pressure modification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD003531.
  27. Ruhle KH, Franke KJ, Domanski U, et al. Quality of life, compliance, sleep and nasopharyngeal side effects during CPAP therapy with and without controlled heated humidification. Sleep Breath. 2011;15(3):479‒485.
  28. Ip S, D'Ambrosio C, Patel K, et al. Auto-titrating versus fixed continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Syst Rev. 2012;1:20.
  29. Xu T, Li T, Wei D, et al. Effect of automatic versus fixed continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Sleep Breath . 2012;16(4):1017‒1026.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Bartley, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.