Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-437X

Microbiology & Experimentation

Mini Review Volume 6 Issue 3

Tuberculosis and immunosuppression

Gabriela Guedes

Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil

Correspondence: Gabriela Guedes, Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235 - Cidade Universitairia, Recife-PE, Brazil, Tel 55 81 21267825

Received: April 11, 2018 | Published: May 18, 2018

Citation: Guedes G. Tuberculosis and immunosuppression. J Microbiol Exp. 2018;6(3):145-146. DOI: 10.15406/jmen.2018.06.00205

Download PDF

Abstract

The immunosuppression caused by many factors such as malnutrition, autoimmune disease, HIV infection or immunosuppressive drugs has contributed to the increased incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in the world.

Keywords: tuberculosis, immunosuppression, HIV, transplanted patient, extrapulmonary

Mini review

The natural history of TB shows that most individuals are resistant to infection. Of the people exposed to M. tuberculosis, between 10-30% become infected, and in only 5 to 10% of these individuals the infection progresses, transforming into active TB. The disease may be disseminated or localized in the pulmonary, lymph, renal, bone, or other organs.1 The period of infectivity depends on numerous factors, such as immunological status, age, gender, and location of the disease.2 However, in some circumstances, where imbalance occurs in the immune response of the host, there is reactivation of latent infection. This process can occur, for example, through HIV infection, malnutrition, use of steroids or other immunosuppressive medications or old age. Although the estimated risk of reactivation of the disease is between 2% and 23%, the risk for individuals immunocompromised by HIV infection is estimated to be high, 5-10% per year.3

Immunosuppression, whether due to an individual's health status (malnutrition, autoimmune disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or use of immunosuppressive drugs has contributed to the increased incidence of tuberculosis in the world. Among the causes of immunosuppression, HIV infection is more important in this context. Raising rates of co-infection with the HIV virus and tuberculosis bacillus poses challenges that prevent the reduction of the incidence of both infections. HIV has not only contributed to a growing number of TB cases, but has also been a major contributor to increased mortality among co-infected patients,4 and tuberculosis as the most prevalent opportunistic disease in infected individuals.5,6

In susceptible immunocompetent individuals, the disease exclusively involves the lung in 85% of cases. Population aging and increased use of immunosuppressive treatments represent risk factors for progression to active tuberculosis.7 In immunocompromised individuals, TB can often become a disseminated disease, with a higher frequency of extrapulmonary sites.8 Ganglionic TB is the second most common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and mainly compromises the cervical chain. The most frequent extrapulmonary sites of tuberculosis in childhood are the ganglion, pleural, bone and meningoencephalic.9

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis is more common in HIV-positive patients, but will occur in about 15% of immunocompetent patients.10 In transplant patients and in patients taking anti-TNF drugs tuberculosis presents in the extrapulmonary form or even disseminated by several sites, in about 25-48%. It has been observed that asymptomatic patients discover tuberculosis infection during the clinical and laboratory routine of their immunosuppressive disease.11 In transplanted patients and in HIV patients with normal CD4+ levels, radiological findings (focal and miliary infiltrates, nodules and pleural effusion) are characteristic of TB, as well as seen in immunocompetent individuals, but in patients immunocompromised by HIV with CD4+ radiological exams present atypical and indeterminate.11 The clinical form of tuberculosis in patients with HIV usually presents in an unspecific way, and may be confused with other infections that affect this type of patient. Fever is a sign almost always present, much more frequent than in immunocompetent patients. The patient may present acute signs that last for hours to a few days of evolution that are confused with a classic bacetriana infection, or present symptoms that last longer such as fever, adynamia, weight loss and anorexia. Symptomatology can affect the urinary system, central nervous system, lymph nodes and liver, although the most commonly affected site is the respiratory tract.11

Immunocompromised people, such as organ recipients, or children under the age of 2 who receive chemotherapy, have a high risk of infectious complications. For example, the incidence of tuberculosis among transplanted patients is 20-74 times higher than in the general population, with a mortality rate of 21-33%.12-14 Few studies report the incidence of TB in transplant patients.15-17 The incidence of TB in organ transplant recipients worldwide ranges from 0.35% to 15%.18 It is estimated that a transplanted patient has a risk of developing TB 50 times higher than the general population.18 The chance of developing TB in dialyzed patients is considerably higher due to uremia-induced immunosuppression, this risk is 10-25 times higher in these patients compared to the general population, and is independent of the status of TT (tuberculin test).19-21 Furthermore, patients on dialysis are generally the candidates for transplantation and latent disease can progress to the disease during immunosuppression imposed during kidney transplantation, i.e patients on hemodialysis have a high risk of TB reactivation.22,23 Tuberculosis in these patients can be difficult to diagnose and frequently presents in the extrapulmonary form.24 Previous studies suggest that there are high rates of PPD energy in patients in the final stage of renal disease25,26 and in dialysates.23 The risk is increased between chronic renal failure,27,28 and increased even more when these patients undergoing transplantation are placed under immunosuppressive therapy.29 Most cases are found in the first year after transplantation,29 so they are likely to represent the progression from latent infection to active disease. Identifying these cases has a positive impact on the morbidity and mortality associated with this infection.30

Nosocomial transmission of TB has also been reported in long-term dialysis patients.31 Studies report an 8-fold increase in the incidence of tuberculosis in dialysis patients in relation to the general population.32 Detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in this population is, thus an important issue, to prevent the progression to active tuberculosis and secondary contamination to other patients and health professionals.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. North RJ, Jung YJ. Immunity to tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:599–623.
  2. Dowdy DW, Steingart KR, Pai M. Serological testing versus other strategies for diagnosis of active tuberculosis in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plos Med. 2011;8(8):e1001074.
  3. Lawn SD, Bradi M, Wood R. Tuberculosis among HIV-infected receiving HAART: long term incidence and risk factors in a South African cohort. AIDS. 2005;19(18):2109–2116.
  4. Jamal LF, Moherdaui F. Tuberculose e infecção pelo HIV no Brasil: magnitude do problema e estratégias para o controle. Rev Saúde Pública. 2007;41(1):104–110.
  5. Corbett EL, Watt CJ, Walker N, et al. The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(9):1009–1021.
  6. http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43629
  7. Horsburgh CR. Priorities for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2060–2070.
  8. Teixeira HC, Abramo C, Munk ME. Diagnóstico imunológico da tuberculose: problemas e estratégias para o sucesso. J Bras Pneumol. 2007;33(3):323–334.
  9. Campos HS. Diagnóstico da tuberculose. Pulmão RJ. 2006;15(2):92–99.
  10. Sonnenberg P, Glynn JR, Fielding, et al. How soon after infection with HIV does the risk of tuberculosis start to increase? A retrospective cohort study in South African gold miners. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(2):150–158.
  11. González-Martin J, Garcia-Garcia JM, Anibarro L, et al. Consensus document n the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of tuberculosis. Arch Bronconeumol. 2010;46(5):255–274.
  12. Gauchon A, André N, Rome A, et al. Evaluation of a screening strategy after occurrence of two simultaneous contaminating tuberculosis cases in a pediatric oncology department. Arch Pediatr. 2008; 15(3):236–244.
  13. Munoz P, Rodriguez C, Bouza E. Mycobacteriumtuberculosis infection in recipients of solid organ transplants. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(4):581–587.
  14. Verma A, Dhawan A, Wade JJ, et al. Mycobacteriumtuberculosis infection in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(7):625–630.
  15. Basiri A, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Simforoosh N, et al. The risk factors and laboratory diagnostics for post renal transplant tuberculosis: a case control, country-wide study on definitive case. Transplant Infection Diseases. 2008;10(4):231–235.
  16. Guida JP, Bignotto Rosane D, Urbini-Santos, et al. Tuberculosis in renal transplant recipients: a brazilian center registry. Trans Proceed. 2009;41(3):883–884.
  17. Kim SH, Choi SJ, Kim NJ, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of a T-cell-based assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(20):2255–2259.
  18. Singh N, Paterson DL. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in solid-organ transplant recipients: Impact and implications for management. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27(5):1266–1277.
  19. American Thoracic Society. Rapid diagnostic tests for tuberculosis: what is the appropriate use? American Thoracic Society Workshop. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(5):1804–1814.
  20. Chou KJ, Fang HC, Bai KJ, et al. Tuberculosis in maintenance dialysys patients. Nephron. 2001; 88(2):138–143.
  21. Moore DAJ, Lightstone L, Javid B, et al. High rates of tuberculosis in end-stage renal failure: the impact of international migration. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(1):77–78.
  22. Rose DN. Benefits of screening for latent Mycobacteriumtuberculosis infection. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(10):1513–1521.
  23. Sester M, Sester U, Clauer P, et al. Tuberculin skin testing underestimates a high prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2004;65(5):1826–1834.
  24. Malik GH, Al-Harbi AS, Al-Mohaya S, et al. Eleven years of experience with dialysis associated tuberculosis. Clin Nephrol. 2002;58(5):356–362.
  25. Smirnoff M, Patt C, Seckler B, et al. Tuberculin and anergy skin testing of patients receiving long-term hemodialysis. Chest. 1998;113(1):25–27.
  26. Woeltje KF, Mathew A, Rothstein M, et al. Tuberculosis infection and anergy in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;31(5):848–852.
  27. Aladren MJ, Vives PJ, Celorrio JM. Diagnosis and prevention of tuberculosis in hemodialysis patients. A new old problem? Nefrologia. 2004;24(3):253–260.
  28. Erkoc R, Dogan E, Sayarlioglu H, et al. Tuberculosis in dialysis patients, single centre experience from an endemic area. Int J Clin Pract 2004;58(12):1115–1117.
  29. John GT, Shabkar V, Abraham AM, et al. Risk factors for post-transplant tuberculosis. Kidney Int. 2001;60(3):1148–1153.
  30. Shankar MSR, Aravindan AN, Sohal PM, et al. The prevalence of tuberculin sensitivity and anergy in chronic renal failure in an endemic area: tuberculin test and the risk of post-transplant tuberculosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(12):2720–2724.
  31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tuberculosis transmission in a Renal Dyalisis Center – Nevada, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(37):873–875.
  32. Simon TA, Paul S, Wartenberg D, et al. Tuberculosis in hemodialysis patients in New Jersey: a statewide study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(9):607–609.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Guedes. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.