Research Article Volume 2 Issue 6
Department of Botany, Centre for Plant Biotechnology, India
Correspondence: Johnson Marimuthu Antonysamy Centre for Plant Biotechnology, Department of Botany, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Palayamkottai, Tamil Nadu, India , Tel 979786924334
Received: July 28, 2015 | Published: December 3, 2015
Citation: Tharmaraj RJJM, Antonysamy JM (2015) Screening of Bactericidal Activity of Selected Plumbago Species Against Bacterial Pathogens. J Microbiol Exp 2(6): 00070. DOI: 10.15406/jmen.2015.02.00070
The present study was undertaken to determine the antibacterial potential of Plumbago species viz., Plumbago zeylanica Linn., Plumbago auriculata Lam. and Plumbago rosea Linn. collected from various localities of South India. For the bio-efficacy studies six different extracts of Plumbago species with various concentrations viz., 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100µg/ml against gram positive and gram negative bacterial pathogens viz., Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 737), Streptococcus pyogenes (MTCC 1928), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 441), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC 109), Morganella morganii (MTCC 662) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 1688) using well diffusion method. Among the eighteen different extracts of three different Plumbago species, highest frequency of antibacterial activity (54%) was recorded in P. rosea. The antibacterial activity of various extracts in different concentration of the selected Plumbago species are as follows: P. rosea (54%) > P. zeylanica (49%) > P. auriculata (40%). The ethanolic extract of all the Plumbago species revealed superior bactericidal activity compared to other tested extracts. The ethanolic extracts of P. zeylanica, P. auriculata and P. rosea showed 91%, 50% and 99% of activity against Gram positive pathogens and 66%, 26% and 89% of activity against Gram negative pathogens. The bioactive compound plumbagin and extract of aerial parts of Plumbago species show a wide spectrum of antibacterial activity. The compound shows promise as a new drug for various bacterial infectious diseases. Hence, this study offers a base of using Plumbago species as herbal alternative for the synthesis of antimicrobial agents.
Keywords: bactericidal, Plumbago species, antibacterial, extracts
Plants and plant derived metabolites are believed as rich sources of antimicrobial agents. A wide range of plants and their parts are used for their medicinal properties by local communities and folklore healers. Plants possess varieties of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial properties. The studies on plant derived polyphenolic compounds confirmed the antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer and apoptosis inducing properties of the plants and supplemented effective usage of medicinal herbs against microorganisms.1,2 With the impact and less side effects, the herbal medicine is practiced as complementary and alternative medicine day by day in developing countries.3,4 Plants and plant derived products are the cheapest, easily avialable and safer alternative sources of antimicrobials.5-7 The phytochemical and pharmacological studies on the roots of P. zeylanica confirmed antiplasmodial, antimicrobial,9 antifungal,10 anti inflammatory and anticancer,11 antihyperglycemic,12 hypolipidaemic and anti atherosclerotic,13 properties of the plant.
The ethnobotanical knowledge and biological studies on the aerial parts or roots of P. auriculata suggested that root and aerial parts of P. auriculata are employed to control black water fever,7 plant are used as anti feedant14 and antifungal agents to control spore germination of Macrophomina phaseolina.15 The ethanolic leaf extract of P. rosea is active against herpus simplex virus type I. The root of P. rosea was used to treat digestive problems, dyspepsia, colic cough and bronchitis.16 Ibrahim et al.,17 studied the antibacterial potentials of P. indica. Devi et al.,18 screened the antibacterial efficacies of P. zeylanica leaf extracts. Vishnukanta & Rana19 studied the anti convulasant activity Plumbago zeylanica, Jeyachandran et al.,20 evaluated the antibacterial activity of plumbagin and root extracts of Plumbago zeylanica, Rahman & Anwar21 screened the antimicrobial activity of Plumbago zeylanica root crude extract. Parekh & Chanda22 studied the antibacterial potentials of P. zeylanica. Tharmaraj & Antonysamy23 screened the antibacterial efficacy of P. rosea from Chankanachari, Kerala. Most of the studies were focused on the antimicrobial potentials of P. zeylanica roots only; very few reports are available on aerial parts of the selected Plumbago species of Tamil Nadu. There is no report on the antimicrobial actvities of Plumbago auriculata. There is no report on the antimicrobial actvities of Plumbago auriculata. To supplement the previous observations, an attempt has been made to reveal the bactericidal activity of three selected Plumbago species viz., Plumbago zeylanica Linn., Plumbago auriculata Lam. and Plumbago rosea Linn. aerial parts.
Preparation of extracts
For bioefficacy studies, the aerial parts of Plumbago zeylanica Linn., Plumbago auriculata Lam. and Plumbago rosea Linn. were collected from Papanasam (Tamil Nadu), Tenkasi (Tamil Nadu) and Dana (Tamil Nadu) respectively. The collected Plumbago species were washed thoroughly with tap water followed by distilled water. The washed Plumbago species were blotted on the blotting paper and spread out at room temperature in shade to remove the excess water contents. The shade dried plant samples were ground to fine powder using mechanical grinder. The powdered samples were stored at 4°C for further use.
The dried and powdered aerial parts of Plumbago species were extracted successively with 30g of plant powder and 180ml of petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethyl acetate, ethanol and water using soxhlet extractor for 8hr at a temperature not exceeding the boiling point of the solvent. The extracts were filtered using Whattman filter paper (No.1) and then concentrated in vacuum at 40°C using rotary evaporator. The residues obtained were stored in a freezer until further tests. One gram of plant extracts were diluted with 1 ml of the respective solvents. They were used as stock solutions for the atibacterial assay.
Preparation of the test organisms
Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 737), Streptococcus pyogenes (MTCC 1928), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 441), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC 109), Morganella morganii (MTCC 662) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 1688) were commercially purchased from Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. Stock cultures of different bacteria were grown in nutrient broth at 30 °C and were sub-cultured and maintained in nutrient broth at 4°C. Before swabbing, each culture was diluted (1:10) with fresh sterile nutrient broth.
Antibacterial assay
The antibacterial activity was determined by the agar well diffusion method Parekh & Chanda.24 A suspension of the culture organism was swabbed above the solidified Muller Hinton agar medium. Wells were made using sterile cork borer under aseptic condition. One millgram of plant extracts were diluted with1 ml of the respective solvents. They were used as stock solutions for the atibacterial assay. From the stock the plant extracts (1mg/ml) various concentrations viz., 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100µg/ml were prepared and inoculated in the wells. The antibiotic amikacin (30μg /disc) was used as a standard to compare its effect on test organisms with the plant extracts. The plates were kept at room temperature for 2 h to allow diffusion of the test solution into the agar then they were incubated for 24h at 37°C. After the incubation period, the plates were observed and zone of inhibition was measured (mm) and the activities were recorded.
Among the three species studied, highest frequency of antibacterial activity (54%) was recorded in P. rosea. The range of antibacterial activity of various extracts of Plumbago species are as follows: P. rosea (54%)>P. zeylanica (49%)>P. auriculata (40%). Major antibacterial activities were observed predominantly in ethanolic extracts (85%) of P. zeylanica. However the range of the inhibition zone varied with test organisms based on different concentration of extracts. Highest antibacterial activity was observed in ethanolic extract at 100µg/ml followed by petroleum ether and chloroform extract. There was minor difference on the size of the inhibition zone between ethanolic and other extracts of P. zeylanica. The range of inhibitory activity was less at lower concentration of extracts (Table 1). Ethanolic extracts of P. zeylanica was active against all the selected bacterial pathogens except B. subtilis which represents no zone of inhibition at 20-40µg/ml concentration. Compared to standard amikacin (30µg), 100µg/ml of ethanolic extract showed more antibacterial (90% and 5%) activity against S. pyogenes and K. pneumonia respectively (Table 1). The ethanolic extracts of P. zeylanica showed higher antibacterial activity against pathogens K. pneumonia and S. pyogenes. The petroleum ether extract of P. zeylanica also expressed maximum zone of inhibition (20±0.5 mm) against S. pyogenes. The acetone and aqueous extracts of P. zeylanica failed to show the antibacterial activity against S. aureus. Similar to that, the petroleum ether, acetone and aqueous extracts of P. zeylanica were also unsuccessful against B. subtilis. The antibacterial activity of P. zeylanica extracts at different concentrations are arranged as follows: ethanolic extracts (85%)>petroleum ether (69%)>chloroform (62%)>acetone (53%)>ethyl acetate (34%)>aqueous extract (31%). Ethanolic extracts of P. zeylanica showed 91% percentage of activity against Gram positive pathogens and 66% of activity against Gram negative pathogens.
Pathogens |
Zone of inhibition in mm |
|||||||
Extracts Conc. in µg |
P |
C |
A |
EA |
E |
AQ |
Amikacin 30µg |
|
S. aureus |
20 |
10±0.2 |
6±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
6±0.3 |
nil |
24 |
40 |
15±0.3 |
9±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
10±0.5 |
nil |
||
60 |
17±0.3 |
10±0.5 |
nil |
3±0.3 |
15±0.3 |
nil |
||
80 |
18±0.4 |
13±0.5 |
nil |
4±0.3 |
18±0.5 |
nil |
||
100 |
19±0.3 |
16±0.5 |
nil |
6±0.5 |
20±0.5 |
nil |
||
B. subtilis |
20 |
nil |
5±0.3 |
nil |
6±0.5 |
nil |
nil |
25 |
40 |
nil |
8±0.5 |
nil |
8±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
||
60 |
nil |
10±0.5 |
nil |
10±0.4 |
5±0.3 |
nil |
||
80 |
nil |
12±0.3 |
nil |
12±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
nil |
||
100 |
nil |
13±0.5 |
nil |
16±0.3 |
9±0.3 |
nil |
||
S. pyogenes |
20 |
14±0.3 |
nil |
5±0.3 |
nil |
15±0.3 |
nil |
11 |
40 |
16±0.3 |
nil |
10±0.3 |
nil |
18±0.5 |
nil |
||
60 |
17±0.3 |
nil |
12±0.5 |
nil |
19±0.3 |
3±0.5 |
||
80 |
19±0.5 |
5±0.3 |
14±0.3 |
nil |
20±0.5 |
4±0.5 |
||
100 |
21±0.5 |
7±0.5 |
18±0.5 |
nil |
21±0.3 |
6±0.5 |
||
K. pneumoniae |
20 |
3±0.3 |
5±0.3 |
3±0.3 |
4±0.3 |
17±0.3 |
nil |
21 |
40 |
4±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
6±0.3 |
6±0.5 |
19±0.3 |
nil |
||
60 |
6±0.3 |
12±0.5 |
8±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
20±0.5 |
3±0.5 |
||
80 |
8±0.3 |
14±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
21 |
5±0.5 |
||
100 |
10±0.3 |
18±0.5 |
12±0.5 |
12±0.5 |
22±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
||
M. morganii |
20 |
nil |
12±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
8±0.3 |
8±0.2 |
20 |
40 |
nil |
16±0.3 |
5±0.5 |
nil |
12±0.3 |
9±0.2 |
||
60 |
nil |
17±0.5 |
8±0.5 |
nil |
15±0.5 |
10±0.2 |
||
80 |
3±0.3 |
19±0.5 |
9±0.2 |
nil |
16±0.5 |
12±0.2 |
||
100 |
6±0.5 |
21±0.5 |
11±0.3 |
nil |
19±0.5 |
14±0.5 |
||
P. aeruginosa |
20 |
7±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
3±0.5 |
2±0.3 |
nil |
24 |
40 |
9±0.5 |
nil |
2±0.3 |
4±0.3 |
4±0.3+ |
nil |
||
60 |
11±0.5 |
nil |
5±0.5 |
7±0.5 |
7±0.5 |
nil |
||
80 |
12±0.5 |
nil |
8±0.3 |
8±0.5 |
10±0.3 |
nil |
||
100 |
16±0.5 |
nil |
10±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
12±0.3 |
nil |
Table 1 Antibacterial activity of Plumbago zeylanica
Note: P, Petroleum ether; C, Chloroform; A, Acetone; EA, Ethylacetate; E, Ethanol; AQ, Water
Similar to P. zeylanica, highest activity was observed in ethanolic extracts (70%) of P. auriculata followed by petroleum ether and chloroform extracts. There was distinguished difference on the size of the inhibition zone between ethanolic and other extracts of P.auriculata. The range of inhibition was directly coincided with the concentrations of extracts tested, less inhibition was observed at lower concentration of extracts and maximum inhibition was obtained in higher concentrations (Table 2).
Pathogens |
Zone of inhibition in mm |
|||||||
Extracts Conc. in µg |
P |
C |
A |
EA |
E |
AQ |
Amikacin 30µg |
|
S. aureus |
20 |
4±0.3 |
2±0.3 |
nil |
4±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
24 |
40 |
6±0.3 |
4±0.3 |
nil |
7±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
||
60 |
8±0.3 |
7±0.7 |
nil |
8±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
||
80 |
10±0.3 |
9±0.5 |
nil |
11±0.3 |
nil |
3±0.5 |
||
100 |
12±0.3 |
11±0.3 |
nil |
13±0.3 |
nil |
4±0.3 |
||
B. subtilis |
20 |
6±0.3 |
nil |
1±0.3 |
2±0.3 |
4±0.3 |
nil |
25 |
40 |
8±0.4 |
nil |
2±0.3 |
4±0.3 |
6±0.3 |
nil |
||
60 |
10±0.3 |
6±0.5 |
4±0.3 |
5±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
1±0.3 |
||
80 |
13±0.5 |
9±0.5 |
6±0.3 |
7±0.2 |
13±0.3 |
4±0.3 |
||
100 |
15±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
8±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
16±0.3 |
6±0.3 |
||
S. pyogenes |
20 |
nil |
nil |
4±0.3 |
10±0.5 |
4±0.3 |
nil |
11 |
40 |
nil |
nil |
6±0.3 |
13±0.3 |
6±0.5 |
nil |
||
60 |
nil |
nil |
7±0.3 |
14±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
3±0.5 |
||
80 |
nil |
nil |
10±0.3 |
16±0.3 |
9 ±0.3 |
4±0.5 |
||
100 |
nil |
nil |
12±0.3 |
18±0.3 |
13±0.5 |
6±0.5 |
||
K. pneumoniae |
20 |
7±0.5 |
4±0.3 |
nil |
4±0.3 |
13±0.5 |
nil |
21 |
40 |
9±0.7 |
6±0.3 |
nil |
6±0.5 |
15±0.3 |
nil |
||
60 |
14±0.3 |
8±0.3 |
3±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
17±0.3 |
3±0.5 |
||
80 |
18±0.3 |
11±0.3 |
6±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
19±0.3 |
5±0.5 |
||
100 |
20±0.5 |
14±0.3 |
7±0.3 |
13±0.3 |
23±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
||
M. morganii |
20 |
3±0.5 |
2±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
20 |
40 |
5±0.5 |
4±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
2±0.3 |
nil |
||
60 |
8±0.3 |
6±0.5 |
nil |
nil |
4±0.3 |
nil |
||
80 |
10±0.3 |
8±0.3 |
3±0.3 |
nil |
6±0.3 |
nil |
||
100 |
14±0.5 |
11±0.5 |
4±0.3 |
nil |
8±0.3 |
nil |
||
P. aeruginosa |
20 |
6±0.3 |
nil |
11±0.3 |
nil |
2±0.3 |
2±0.3 |
24 |
40 |
9±0.3 |
nil |
14±0.3 |
nil |
3±0.3 |
4±0.3 |
||
60 |
11±0.3 |
nil |
16±0.3 |
nil |
5±0.5 |
7±0.5 |
||
80 |
14±0.3 |
nil |
18±0.3 |
nil |
7±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
||
100 |
16±0.3 |
nil |
20±0.3 |
nil |
10±0.3 |
12±0.3 |
Table 2 Antibacterial activity of Plumbago auriculata
Note: P, Petroleum ether; C, Chloroform; A, Acetone; EA, Ethylacetate; E, Ethanol; AQ, Water
The ethanolic extracts of P. auriculata demonstrated maximum zone of inhibition (23±0.3 mm) against M. morganii (Table 2). P. auriculata ethanolic extracts was active against all the examined pathogens except S. aureus. Compared to all the tested pathogens, K. pneumoniae was highly sensitive to all the screened extracts of P. auriculata. The 40-100µg/ml of ethyl acetate extracts represented more percentage of activity (18, 27, 45 and 63%) against S. pyogenes than the standard amikacin. 100µg/ml ethanolic extracts represented 18% and 9% of more antibacterial activity against S. pyogenes and K. pneumoniae than the standard amikacin. Similar to ethyl acetate and ethnaolic extracts, acetone extracts also showed more activity against S. pyogenes than the standard amikacin.
The significant antibacterial activity was observed in ethanolic extracts compared to other tested extracts of P. auriculata. The activity of P. auriculata extracts as follows: ethanolic extracts 70%>petroleum ether 54%>ethyl acetate 53%>acetone 48%>chloroform 34%>water extract 31%. The ethanolic extracts of P. auriculata showed above 50% activity against Gram positive pathogens and 26% activity against Gram negative pathogens.
In P. rosea, highest activity was observed in ethanolic extracts (91%) followed by acetone (64%) and chloroform extracts (59%). The ethanolic extracts 100µg/ml showed 45% higher antibacterial activity against S. pyogenes and 10% more activity against M. morganii than the standard amikacin. There was prominent difference on the size of the inhibition zone between ethanolic and other extracts of P. rosea. All the screened extracts of P. rosea demonstrated the inhibition against K. pneumoniae (Table 3). Highest antibacterial activity was observed in ethanolic extracts against B. subtilis and M. morganii with 22±0.3 and 22±0.7 mm zone of inhibition. Except 20µg/ml of water extracts, all other extracts of P. rosea with various concentrations (20-100µg/ml) showed activity against K. pneumonia and maximum zone of inhibition (20±0.3 mm) was observed in ethanolic extracts of P. rosea. The 100µg/ml of P. rosea ethanolic extracts displayed higher activity against M. morganii with 22±0.5 mm zone of inhibition.
Pathogens |
Zone of inhibition in mm |
|||||||
Extracts Conc. in µg |
P |
C |
A |
EA |
E |
AQ |
An 30µg |
|
S. aureus |
20 |
7±0.5 |
nil |
2±0.5 |
5±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
24 |
40 |
11±0.5 |
nil |
9±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
4±0.3 |
nil |
||
60 |
14±0.5 |
nil |
10±0.2 |
11±0.3 |
6±0.5 |
nil |
||
80 |
15±0.7 |
nil |
12±0.3 |
13±0.3 |
8±0.5 |
nil |
||
100 |
18±0.3 |
nil |
14±0.3 |
16±0.3 |
9±0.3 |
nil |
||
B. subtilis |
20 |
3±0.3 |
nil |
4±0.5 |
6±0.5 |
15±0.3 |
nil |
25 |
40 |
6.5±0.7 |
nil |
6±0.5 |
8±0.3 |
19±0.3 |
3±0.3 |
||
60 |
7±0.4 |
nil |
11±0.5 |
10±0.4 |
20±0.7 |
4 |
||
80 |
11±0.5 |
nil |
14±0.3 |
12±0.3 |
21±0.3 |
5±0.3 |
||
100 |
13±0.3 |
nil |
17±0.3 |
14±0.3 |
22±0.3 |
7±0.3 |
||
S. pyogenes |
20 |
nil |
nil |
8±0.3 |
4±0.1 |
3±0.3 |
nil |
11 |
40 |
nil |
4±0.3 |
10±0.5 |
7±0.5 |
6±0.3 |
nil |
||
60 |
nil |
6±0.5 |
12±0.3 |
8±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
nil |
||
80 |
nil |
8±0.3 |
14±0.3 |
12±0.5 |
9±0.5 |
nil |
||
100 |
nil |
9±0.5 |
16±0.3 |
13±0.5 |
10±0.5 |
nil |
||
K. pneumoniae |
20 |
10±0.5 |
7±0.4 |
8±0.3 |
10±0.3 |
11±0.3 |
nil |
21 |
40 |
13±0.5 |
12±0.3 |
12±0.3 |
12±0.3 |
14±0.3 |
5±0.3 |
||
60 |
16±0.8 |
14±0.3 |
13±0.5 |
13±0.5 |
16±0.5 |
6±0.3 |
||
80 |
17±0.4 |
16±0.3 |
15±0.3 |
16±0.3 |
18±0.5 |
6±0.5 |
||
100 |
19±0.5 |
17±0.3 |
16±0.5 |
18±0.3 |
20±0.5 |
8±0.5 |
||
M. morganii |
20 |
6±0.5 |
9±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
12±0.3 |
nil |
20 |
40 |
11±0.5 |
12±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
16±0.3 |
2±0.3 |
||
60 |
12±0.3 |
14±0.5 |
nil |
nil |
18±0.3 |
3 |
||
80 |
14±0.3 |
16±0.4 |
nil |
nil |
20±0.3 |
4±0.5 |
||
100 |
16±0.3 |
18±0.3 |
nil |
nil |
22±0.7 |
5±0.5 |
||
P. aeruginosa |
20 |
nil |
4±0.5 |
8±0.3 |
3±0.3 |
7±0.5 |
nil |
24 |
40 |
nil |
9±0.5 |
10±0.3 |
7±0.3 |
9±0.5 |
nil |
||
60 |
nil |
10±0.3 |
13±0.3 |
8±0.3 |
13±0.5 |
nil |
||
80 |
nil |
13±0.3 |
15±0.2 |
11±0.5 |
14±0.5 |
nil |
||
100 |
nil |
16±0.5 |
18±0.4 |
13±0.4 |
17±0.5 |
nil |
Table 3 Antibacterial activity of Plumbago rosea
Note: P, Petroleum ether; C, Chloroform; A, Acetone; EA, Ethylacetate; E, Ethanol; AQ, Water
Similar to other two studied plants, the highest zone of inhibition was observed in ethanolic extracts compared to other tested extracts of P.rosea. The activity of P. rosea extracts as follows: ethanolic extracts 91% >acetone; 64%>chloroform; 56%>ethyl acetate; 52%>petroleum ether; 50%>water extract. Ethanolic extract of P. rosea showed Gram 99% activity against positive pathogens and 89% activity against Gram negative pathogens.
Due to the failure of synthetic drugs, adverse side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance of the microorganisms led to the development of new plant derived antibiotic without any side effects.3,6,25,26 Simonsen et al.,8 documented the use of natural products as new antibacterial drugs. In the present study also we screened the antibacterial potentials of P. rosea, P. zeylanica and P. auriculata against various bacterial pathogens. The ethanolic extract of P. zeylanica and P. rosea showed high frequency of activity against Gram positive pathogens and Gram negative pathogens. The ethanolic extracts of P. auriculata showed leact activity against the tested pathogens. The antibacterial potentials of the P. rosea, P. zeylanica and P. auriculata against the tested pathogens may be due to the existence of alkaloids, phenolic substantces.27
Antimicrobial activities of Plumbago species have been reported by many workers, Ibrahim et al.,17 evaluated the antibacterial activity using the methanolic extracts of P. indica against S. aureus, S. typhi, S. dysenteriae, B. cereus P. aeruginosa, S. sonnei, V. cholera and E. coli. The highest inhibition was observed against S. aureus, E. coli and S. typhi compared to other pathogens ranged from 15-27 mm. Devi et al.,28 studied the antibacterial activity of P. zeylanica methanolic leaf, root and stem extract of against Bacillus subtilis. Antibacterial activity of methanolic and chloroform extracts of P. zeylanica against five different organisms viz., S. pyogenes, S. aureus, Bacillus sp., P. aeruginosa and E. coli were studied using disc diffusion method. The methanolic extracts were more active against all the tested organisms.18 Vishnukanta & Rana29 studied the antibacterial activity of P. zeylanica against S. gallinarium, E. coli, P. vulgaris, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Among the tested extracts methanolic extract exhibited higher antibacterial activity against all the pathogenic bacteria.
Jetty et al.,30 evaluated the antimicrobial properties of compounds such as neoisoshinanolone and 1-epineo-isoshinanolone isolated from the roots of P. zeylanica. Among these 1-epineo-isoshinanolone is more active with a MIC of 12.5-25µg/mL whereas neoisoshinanolone has recorded a MIC of 50-100µg/mL. The activities are compared with plumbagin [0.78-3.13µg/mL] and standards streptomycin for bacteria and nystatin for fungi. Jeyachandran et al.,20 revealed the minimum inhibitory concentration of methanolic, chloroform and aqueous extract of P. zeylanica root against E. coli, S. typhi and S. aureus. The zone of inhibition against K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens and B. subtilis were moderate and lower against Proteus vulgaris and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The methanolic extract exhibited moderate activity and the aqueous extract weak activity against bacterial strains as assessed by disc diffusion assays.
Rahman & Anwar21 studied the antimicrobial activities of ethanolic extracts of P. zeylanica root against 11 human pathogenic bacteria and 6 phytopathogenic fungi using disc diffusion method. V. cholerae was found to be the most sensitive. Parekh et al.,24 studied the antibacterial potential of P. zeylanica using agar disc diffusion method and agar well diffusion method against five bacterial strains viz., B. cereus, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, E. coli and P. pseudoalcaligenes. Preliminary screening revealed that methanolic extracts were more potent than the aqueous extracts. Wang & Huang31 revealed the anti-H. pylori activity of ethanolic, ethyl acetate, acetone and aqueous extracts of P. zeylanica.
Paiva et al.,14 evaluated the antimicrobial activity in the plumbagin isolated from the chloroform extract of P. scandens against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, P. vulgaris and against the yeast C. albicans. Plumbagin exhibited relatively specific antimicrobial activity. The growth of S. aureus and C. albicans was completely inhibited. Antibacterial activity of P. zeylanica alcoholic root extracts was studied against multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of bacteria (S. paratyphi, S. aureus, E. coli, S. dysenteriae). The extracts exhibited strong antibacterial activity against all test bacteria irrespective of their antibiotic resistance behaviour.9 Except Wang & Hang et al.,31 observation, all others were recorded the highest frequency of antibacterial activity in the methanolic extracts of Plumbago species. Tharmaraj & Antonysamy23 observed the antibacterial activity of P. rosea against K. pneumoniae, B. subtilis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and P. vulgaris with maximum zone inhibition 20, 19, 17, 16 and 16 mm respectively. In the present study we observed better results then the previous observations. 100µg of ethanolic extracts of P. rosea showed maximum zone of inhibition against B. subtilis and K. pneumoniae with 22 and 20 mm respectively. 100µg of acetone extracts of P. rosea demonstrated maximum zone (18 mm) of inhibition against P. aeruginosa earlier 16 mm of inihibition was observed with 250µg of methanolic extracts. In addition, the ethanolic and acetone extracts of P. rosea illustrated the inhibition against M. morganii (22 mm) and S. pyogenes (16 mm) respectively.
Similar to that in the present study also we observed the high frequency of antibacterial activity in the ethanolic extracts of three Plumbago species. The antibacterial action of various aerial parts extracts of Plumbago species may indicate their potential as antibacterial herbal remedies. Further work is needed to locate the active principle from the various extracts and their phyto pharmaceutical studies. Research into the effects of local medicinal plants is expected to boost the use of these plants in the therapy against disease caused by the test bacterial species and other microorganisms.
None.
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
©2015 Tharmaraj, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.