Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-437X

Microbiology & Experimentation

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 3

Purification and Characterization of 221, the Cationic Peptide that Inhibits Staphylococcus aureus

Mohammed Al Mahrous,1 James Burnie,2 John Tagg,3 Mathew Upton4

1Department of Medical Microbiology, Maternity and Children Hospital in Dammam, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manchester, UK
3Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, New Zealand
4School of Biomedical & Healthcare Sciences Plymouth, University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, UK

Correspondence: Mohammed Al Mahrous, Department of Medical Microbiology, Maternity and Children Hospital in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, Tel 96659233472

Received: June 10, 2017 | Published: July 24, 2017

Citation: Mahrous MA, Burnie J, Tagg J, Upton M (2017) Purification and Characterization of 221, the Cationic Peptide that Inhibits Staphylococcus aureus. J Microbiol Exp 5(3): 00152. DOI: 10.15406/jmen.2017.05.00152

Download PDF

Abstract

Bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLISs) that are produced by various species of Staphylococcus spp., could have potential as topical therapeutic agents for treating highly drug-resistant staphylococcal infections. The spectrum of activity of some such agents, recently identified in our laboratory, has been characterized. This was carried out at different temperatures using deferred antaonism assay. The biological activity of 221, which produced by S. epidermidis strain 221 and shows activity against Epidemic MRSA-15 and strains of MSSA, is described in detail. The initial characterization of this agent showed that its activity is stable on plates pre-exposed to high temperatures (70-80oC/30-40mins) and displaying specificity for S. aureus. This suggests that BLIS 221 is a bacteriocin in nature, possibly of Class-I.

Keywords: Drug; Antaonism; Staphylococcal; Antibiotics; Proteinaceous; Genetic

Abbreviations

BLISs: Bacteriocin Like Inhibitory Substances

Introduction

Staphylococcal Resistance to conventional antibiotics used to treat staphylococcal infections has risen to an alarming level [1,2]. A contributing factor has been the widespread use of antibiotics to treat non-life-threatening infections. In recent years, there has been much focus on a promising new class of bacteriocins known as lantibiotics [3,4].

Bacteriocins are proteinaceous substances produced by certain bacteria, which display growth-inhibitory activity against a range of other bacteria belonging to the same or closely-related species. Bacteriocins of gram-negative bacteria (colisins) have been extensively characterized, resulting in comprehensive knowledge of the genetic basis, domain structure, mode of formation, and killing action of these molecules [5,6]. On the other hand, the bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria have been classified into numerous subtypes [7-9]. The first class of bacteriocins (lantibiotics) is distinguishable from other antibiotics because of their polypeptide nature and bioactive properties. We here investigate the administration of the novel cationic peptide antibiotic (221) as a future opportunity for treating staphylococcal infections.

Material and Methods

Bacterial strains

S. epidermidis 221 was (The University of Manchester, Clinical Microbiology Department Library Strains, Strain no. 221) maintained on Columbia blood agar but was propagated in TSAYca (30g of Oxoid Trypticase soy powder per liter, 20g of Bacto yeast extract per liter, 5g of Bacto Calcium carbonate per liter, 10g of Oxoid Biological agar) at 37oC, then 221 inhibitor was extracted by freeze-thaw method on which 221 strain was grown as a lawn under appropriate incubation conditions. After incubation, the plates were frozen at -70oC for 3-4 hr, and then thawed at room temperature. The frozen agar exudes liquid as it thaws. This was collected, clarified by centrifugation at 15,764g for 5 min and tested for inhibitory activity by the spot or well diffusion assay.

Staphylococcal core indicator strains (Table 1) were used in subsequent assays to test for S. aureus susceptibility to activity of 221 strains and used as representative of sensitive, moderate and highly resistant species to synthetic antibiotics. These strains were clinical isolates selected from a wide range of S. aureus library with the exception of an M. leutus strain, which was a reference isolate used commonly as a sensitive biological indicator of BLIS [10].

Indicator

Strain Specification

I1

Micrococcus luteus, strain T-181

A222

Methacillin-sensitive S. aureus strain A222

A269

Methacillin-sensitive S. aureus strain A269

A285

Methacillin-sensitive S. aureus strain A285

A208

Epidemic methacillin-resistant S. aureus type-15 strain A208

Table 1: Staphylococcal core indicator strains.
1From Tagg and Bannister (1979)

Bacteriocin assay

Bacteriocin production was determined as described previously by either agar well diffusion assay or spot-on-lawn assay [11].

221 purification

An overnight culture of S. epidermidis 221 was used to inoculate TSAYca media. The culture was incubated at 37°C, and the cells were then removed using a sterile spatula. The free bacterial cells plate culture was then frozen at -70oC for 3-4h, and then thawed at room temperature. The liquor was then collected and centrifuged at 15,764g for 15min. The liquor was then filter-sterilized by passage through a 0.45-mm-pore-size membrane filter.

Solid (NH4)2SO4 was added to 60% saturation at room temperature, and the solution was stirred for approximately 20min until all of the ammonium sulfate had dissolved. A floating pellicle composed of protein and lipid was removed, and the suspension was centrifuged at 15,764g for 15min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and the precipitate was dissolved in a minimal volume of 10mM sodium phosphate, (pKa 7.2).

After centrifugation at 15,760g for 10min at 4°C to remove insoluble protein, the sample was bound to a cation-exchange column (DIONEX, ProPacTM SCX-10, Analytical, 2×250 mm, Product no. SP5572, Serial no. 0101.) and eluted with an increasing gradient of 1M NaCl at a flow rate of 1ml/min. Buffer A consisted of 10mM (H2NaO4P) (pH 7.2), and buffer B was composed of buffer A and 1M NaCl. Fractions were collected, and analyzed for activity.

Fractions containing peak bacteriocin activity were pooled and then passed over a C18 reverse-phase chromatography column (Genesis C18 300 column [part#FM15975E, batch#9532, Jones chromatography]) at flow rates of 1ml/min. Buffer A consisted of 99.9% Millipore water -0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and buffer B was 99.9% acetonitrile – 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Fractions with bacteriocin activity were concentrated by evaporation, and final purification was achieved by a second cycle of C18 reverse phase chromatography with a shallower acetonitrile gradient. The peak fraction of 221 activities was dried by evaporation and resuspended in DH2O, and the total activity and protein content were determined.

SDS-PAGE and bioassay

Analysis of purified 221 preparations was carried out by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) [12]. After electrophoresis, gels were either silver stained [13] or bioassayed by a modification of the method of [14]. The gels were soaked in a solution composed of 20% isopropanol and 10% acetic acid for 2h to remove the SDS, followed by rinsing in distilled water for 4h. The washed gels were placed on a BHT-80 agar plate and overlaid with BHT-80 agar (0.7%) containing Micrococcus leutus at a concentration of 108 organisms.ml-1. The plate-gel combination was incubated at 37°C overnight prior to examination for zones of clearing over the bands of 221.

Analytical methods

To precisely determine the size of purified 221, the samples were analyzed on a Lasermat matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometer at the Univeristy of Manchester Biomolecular Analysis Core Facility.

Results

221 production

221 was isolated from the freeze-thaw liquor of cultures prepared in TSAYca medium to minimize the presence of contaminating proteins and peptides. Monitoring of the production of the bacteriocin during the growth of S. epidermidis 221 showed that it was continuously produced, but maximum activity was found in the culture medium at the very end of the exponential and early stationary phase of growth. When production ceased, the bacteriocin that had accumulated maintained its full activity without inactivation. 221 seemed to exist predominantly in an extracellular form. Activity was found mainly in the supernatant fluid (about 96%); the pellet contained about 4% (Figure 1-3).

Figure 1: Investigating the spectrum of activity of 221 against a range of staphylococcal indicators using deferred antagonism method.
Figure 2: Investigating the spectrum of activity of E221 against a range of staphylococcal indicators using deferred antagonism assay.
Figure 3: Detecting of 221 from the TSAYca supernatant.

Purification of 221

Results of the purification of the bacteriocin from the culture of S. epidermidis 221 are summarized in Table 2. After the last step of purification, 20% of 221 were recovered and the specific activity was _1000-fold higher than that of the culture supernatant. The partially purified peptide was assessed first by Cationic exchange chromatography (Figure 4). Then, the purity of 221 was assessed by HPLC analysis on a C18 column (Figure 5). The elution profile, monitored at 280 nm, demonstrated a distinct absorbency peak which eluted with 56%(v/v) acetonitrile and correlated with the peak of 221 activity. Mass spectrometry analysis indicated that the molecular mass of 221 was between 2000 and 3000 Da.

Purification Phase

Spectrum of Activity

Culture supernatant

1:16

(NH4)2SO4 precipitation

0.086111

CEC1

0.397222

RPC2

0.752778

Table 2: Spectrum of activity of the different phases of purification of S. epidermidis strain 221.
1Cation-exchange chromatography
2Reverse-phase chromatography

Figure 4: Separation of ammonium sulphate extract of 221 by cation-exchange column chromatography.
Figure 5: Separation of the active fractions of 221 from cation-exchange column chromatography by reverse-phase column chromatography.

Inhibitory spectrum of 221

By means of the agar diffusion method, all strains of Staphylococcus spp. (including methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus strains), originated from various clinical specimens, were found to be sensitive to purified 221. All these strains were resistant to numerous antibiotics including the third-generation cephalosporin (Cefoxitin).

Discussion

Lantibiotics are a group of ribosomally synthesized, post-translationally modified peptides containing unusual amino acids. Such amino acids include the thioether amino acids lanthionine (Lan) and/or MeLan, in addition to a number of modified residues, such as 2,3-didehydroalanine (Dha) and 2,3-didehydrobutyrine (Dhb). The presence and influence of these residues on the structure and activity of lantibiotics has been a major hurdle during the sequencing of the 221. This is why Edman degradation is usually necessary for sequencing lantibiotics. In this study, we isolated the bacteriocin-producing strain from a clinical sample. Bacterial characters and laboratory analysis indicated that 221-producing strain was S. epidermidis. The heat-stability and the differences in the spectrum of activity against staphylococcal indicators suggest that 221 is a bacteriocin-type inhibitor.

Like most other lantibiotics, 221 is a small cationic peptide and could cause permeabilization of the target cell membrane. The high ammonium sulfate saturation (60%) needed for precipitating 221 suggests that its molecular mass is small. This was confirmed using MALDI TOF/TOF, which seized the mass of 221 in a window mass between 2000 and 3000 Da. The narrow range of inhibitory activity of 221, which was specific for Staphylococcus spp., is also one character of the lantibiotics behaviors.

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. Philip Wescombe for stimulating discussions. Many thanks to Dr. David Knight from Manchester Biomolecular Analysis Core Facility for helping in mass-spectrometry. We would like also to thank Marj Howard for her support in operating Ettan-LC. Special thanks also go to Ministry of health in Saudi Arabia for financially supporting the research.

References

  1. Inês Crisóstomo M, Henrik Westh, Alexander Tomasz, Marilyn Chung, Duarte C Oliveira, et al. (2001) The evolution of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: Similarity of genetic backgrounds in historically early methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates and contemporary epidemic clones. The National Academy of Sciences 98(17): 9865-9870.
  2. Tomasz A (1998) Accelerated evolution: emergence of multidrug resistant gram-positive bacterial pathogens in the 1990's. Neth J Med 52(6): 219-227.
  3. McClerren AL, Cooper LE, Quan C, Thomas PM, Kelleher NL, et al. (2006) Discovery and in vitro biosynthesis of haloduracin, a two-component lantibiotic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(46): 17243-17248.
  4. xvan Kraaij C, de Vos WM, Siezen RJ, Kuipers OP (1999) Lantibiotics: biosynthesis, mode of action and applications. Nat Prod Rep 16(5): 575-587.
  5. Pugsley AP (1984) The ins and outs of colicins. Part I: Production, and translocation across membranes. Microbiol sci 1(7): 168-175.
  6. Pugsley AP (1984) The ins and outs of colicins. Part II. Lethal action, immunity and ecological implications. Microbiol sci 1(8): 203-205.
  7. Jack RW, Tagg JR, Ray B (1995) Bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Rev 59(2): 171-200.
  8. Jack RW, Sahl HG, Bierbaum G (1998) Lantibiotics and related peptides. Biotechnology intelligence unit, Springer, London, UK, pp. 224.
  9. Klaenhammer TR (1993) Genetics of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12(1-3): 39-85.
  10. Tagg JR, Bannister LV (1979) “Fingerprinting" beta-haemolytic streptococci by their production of and sensitivity to bacteriocine-like inhibitors. J Med Microbiol 12(4): 397-411.
  11. Mayr Harting A, Hedges AJ, Berkeley RCW (1972) Methods for studying bacteriocins. In: Norris JR, Ribbons (Eds.) Methods in Microbiology. (7A edn). Academic Press, New York, UK, pp. 315-422.
  12. Merquior VLC, Peralta JM, Facklam RR, Teixeira LM (1994) Analysis of electrophoretic whole-cell protein profiles as a tool for characterization of Enterococcus species. Current Microbiology 28(3): 149-153.
  13. Merril CR, Goldman D, Sedman SA, Ebert MH (1981) Ultrasensitive stain for proteins in polyacrylamide gels shows regional variation in cerebrospinal fluid proteins. Science 211(4489): 1437-1438.
  14. Bhunia AK, Johnson MC, Ray B (1987) Direct detection of an antimicrobial peptide of Pediococcus acidilactici in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 2(5): 319-322.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Mahrous, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.