Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-437X

Microbiology & Experimentation

Research Article Volume 10 Issue 2

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter Koseri isolated on clinical samples of hospitalized patients

Lilianne Dominguez Céspedes,1 Yohorlin Marta Céspedes Fonseca2

1 Microbiology Department, “Lucía Íñiguez Landín” Surgical Clinical Hospital, Cuba
2Dermatology Department, “Lucía Íñiguez Landín” Surgical Clinical Hospital, Cuba

Correspondence: Dra. Lilianne Dominguez Céspedes, Assistant professor, Laboratory of Microbiology, “Lucia Íñiguez Landín” Surgical Clinical Hospital, Holguín, Cuba, Tel +53 52065002

Received: March 28, 2022 | Published: April 11, 2022

Citation: Cespedes LD, Fonseca YMC. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter Koseri isolated on clinical samples of hospitalized patients. J Microbiol Exp. 2022;10(2):54-57. DOI: 10.15406/jmen.2022.10.00353

Download PDF

Abstract

The genus Citrobacter includes 13 species and is often found in water, food, land and certain animals. It is part of the normal flora of a small proportion of healthy humans; however, the rates of colonization increase in patients in long-term care institutions and hospitals. Citrobacter koseri is an aerobic Gram-negative bacillus, ubiquitous in nature, opportunistic, that is frequently found in genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts of animals and humans as a saprophyte flora. Citrobacter koseri is one of the most important pathogens, eventually causing epidemics difficult to control. Therefore, the objective of this article is to carry out a microbiological characterization of this pathogen. A transversal descriptive study was conducted in the Surgical Clinical Hospital Lucía Íñiguez Landín of Holguín, which covered the period from January to December 2019. The study universe consisted of all enterobacteriaceae isolated in clinical samples of adult patients admitted during this period and the sample was formed by 219 strains of Citrobacter koseri. Out of the total number of cases, 70 belonged to the intensive care service for a 32.0%. Out of the total number of samples, 139 were isolated in pus samples for a 63.5%. The strains were more resistant to ciprofloxacin, cefuroxime, ampicillin, aztreonam, ceftazidime and to gentamicin. Citrobacter koseri is able to develop multidrug resistance to known antibiotics, acts as opportunistic and can colonize people in community, consequently its dissemination should be controlled.

Keywords: Citrobacter koseri, nosocomial infections, antimicrobial susceptibility, resistance mechanisms

Introduction

The genus Citrobacter includes 13 species, of which the most frequently isolated are: C. freundii, C. koseri and C. amalonaticus, so named due to their ability to use citrate as their only carbon source. They differ because of their ability to convert tryptophan into indole, to ferment lactose and use malonate.1 The gene Blacko (encodes the chromosomal class A B-lactamase CKO) is only present in C. koseri; therefore, it represents an interesting means to differentiate it from other species of Citrobacter. C. freundii and C. koseri cause most infections by Citrobacter, which have epidemiology and clinical manifestations similar to those of enterobacter infections.1 The genus Citrobacter is often found in water, food, land and certain animals. It is part of the normal flora of a small proportion of healthy human beings; however, colonization rates increase in patients in long-term care institutions and hospitals, provoking 1 to 2% of nosocomial infections. Affected hosts usually have immunosuppression or concomitant diseases. According to a large observational study, Citrobacter spp. account for 0.8% of all Gram-negative infections in a hospital setting, with a mortality rate in hospitalized patients that ranged from 6.8% to 56%. Citrobacter causes extraintestinal infections similar to those caused by other Gram-negative bacilli. Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Citrobacter strains are associated with a higher rate of in-hospital mortality compared to those caused by susceptible strains.1-3 C. koseri is an aerobic Gram-negative bacillus, ubiquitous in nature and opportunistic, which is frequently found in genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts of animals and humans as a saprophyte flora. These microorganisms can produce serious infections, especially in immunocompromised hosts; with greater preference for the central nervous system; they are associated with meningitis, cerebral abscesses, ventriculitis, panophthalmitis and sepsis. Most cases are sporadic, without a clear source of infection. C. koseri is one of the most important pathogens, eventually causing epidemics difficult to control. It has been described that in other anatomical sites it destroys microvilli, causing characteristic adhesion and elimination injuries.4,5 C. koseri has a susceptibility pattern to the antibiotics similar to that of Klebsiella (resistant to ampicillin and ticarcillin), is sensitive to ciprofloxacin, carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins, piperaciline-thazobactam, aminoglycosides and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.6,7

Nosocomial infections are an important cause of high morbidity and mortality in the health care system. Those caused by resistant microorganisms generate nosocomial outbreaks difficult to eradicate. This increase in infection is due to several reasons: the disease of the patient that causes a state of immunosuppression, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics as well as the use of steroids, the instruments derived from new technologies, the long-term use of parenteral nutrition, among others. In the present study, C. koseri is the main pathogen responsible for nosocomial infections; it is alarming because it is not an isolated bacterium in large quantities of clinical samples and its resistance pattern shows that eventually we may not have resources to confront it. Therefore, the objective of this article is to carry out a microbiological characterization of this pathogen.

Material and methods

A tranversal descriptive study was carried out at the Surgical Clinical Hospital Lucía Íñiguez Landín of Holguín, which covered the period from January to December 2019. The study universe consisted of all enterobacteriaceae isolated on clinical samples of adult patients admitted during this period and the sample was formed by 219 strains of Citrobacter koseri. 

Inclusion criteria: All patients included in the study were selected by the positivity of their samples.

Exclusion criteria: contaminated or non-viable samples for study.

The variables analyzed in each isolation were: service in which it was isolated, type of sample, and the level of resistance, all polychotomus nominal qualitative.

The methodology used to identify the Citrobacter koseri was the following:

Biological samples: purulent, hemocultures, respiratory secretions, otic exudates, biliary liquid, catheter, sputum, ascitic fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, peritoneal fluid, abdominal fluid, urine culture.

Materials and culture media: Graduated culture incubator of 35 to 37ºC inoculation loops and needles. Gram stain sets. Plates for serology. Lab microscope slides. Blood Agar Plates 5%, Mac Conkey Agar, SS agar, XLD agar, nutrient agar, Müeller-Hinton agar for antibiogram, that will be used based on the type of sample, whether it is intestinal or extraintestinal infections. Oxidase reagent.

Tests for biochemical identification: Klighler, Lia, Mio, Simmons citrate, Christensen urea. Phenylalanine, sodium malonate, Voges Proskauer, sorbitol. Polivalent antisera of Citrobacter. Container with a lid with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution, for the tank of the discard material of the serological tests.

Direct examination: Useful samples to be researched are extended and stained with Gram, observing gram-negative, characteristic bacillus.

Identification: Biochemical tests are used for identification of gender and species, according to the attached tables and flowcharts.

Antibiogram: The susceptibility proof is performed through the dissemination method with the Kirby and Bauer technique. The standards ​​to determine the susceptibility to the different antibiotics, were taken from the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, using the standardized method of disk broadcasting (known as Bauer-Kirby), using non-supplementing Mueller-Hinton agar with NaCl.8

The data was obtained from both the records and antibiograms of the microbiology laboratory and the medical records of patients diagnosed with Citrobacter koseri through a worksheet that gathered the origin of the samples and the service of origin, as well as the laboratory results and the antibiotic sensitivity for 29 antibiotics, Amikacin, Ampicillin, Ampicillin/Sulbactam, Cefazoline, Cefepime, Ceftazidime, Cephtriaxone, Tobracycin, Piperacylin, Amoxicillin, Piperacylin/Tazobactam, Cefotaxime, Cefuroxime, Aztreonam, Azithromycin, Meropenem, Gentamycin, Kanamicin Ciprofloxacin, Norfloxacin, AC. Nalidixic, Trimethoprim/Sulfametoxazole, Chloramphenicol, Nitrofurantoin, Phosphomycin, Streptomycin, Tetracycline, Doxycycline, Augmentín; they presented 3 values: resistant (R), intermediate (I) and sensitive (s).

Based on this spreadsheet, a database was developed, using Microsoft Office Access 2010, which allowed the statistical analysis of the variables. The information was summarized in tables using the Microsoft Office Excel 2010 program for a better understanding and analysis. With the data obtained, simple frequency distribution tables were elaborated and the results were expressed in whole numbers and percentages.

Results

Table 1 shows the distribution according to hospitalization services. Out of the total number of cases, 70 belonged to the intensive care service for a 32.0%.

Services

No

%

ICU

70

32

Kidney Transplant

6

2.7

Angiology

25

11.4

Hemodialysis

1

0.5

Intermediate Therapy

17

7.8

Urology

16

7.3

Ophthalmology

1

0.5

Dermatology

4

1.8

Neurosurgery

11

5

Neurology

3

1.4

Surgery

29

13.2

Orthopedics

24

11

ORL

2

0.9

Hematology

4

1.8

Internal Medicine

6

2.7

Total

219

100

Table 1 Distribution according to hospitalization services
ICU, intensive care unit; ORL, otorhinolaryngology
Source: Microbiology records

Table 2 shows the distribution according to the type of sample where the strains were isolated. Out of the total number of samples, 139 were isolated in pus samples for a 63.5%.

Sample

No

%

Purulent

139

63.5

Blood culture

19

8.7

Respiratory secretions

23

10.5

Otic Exudate

2

0.9

Bile Fluid

2

0.9

Catheter

12

5.5

Sputum

1

0.4

Ascitic fluid

1

0.4

Cerebrospinal fluid

3

1.4

Peritoneal fluid

5

2.3

Abdominal fluid

2

0.9

Urine culture

10

4.6

Total

219

100

Table 2 Distribution according to type of sample
Source: Microbiology records

The tables show the susceptibility profile for the different antibiotics. The strains showed greater resistance to ciprofloxacin in table 3, in table 4 to cefuroxime, ampicillin, aztreonam and ceftazidime, and in table 5 gentamicin was the predominant antibiotic in terms of resistance.

Antibiotics

Symbol

S

I

R

Azithromycin

AZM

1

0

23

Ciprofloxacin

CIP

39

2

98

Norfloxacin

NOR

5

0

7

Ac. Nalidixic

NA

11

1

63

Trimethoprim/Sulfametoxazole

SXT

9

0

42

Chloramphenicol

C

25

0

50

Nitrofurantoin

F

38

2

43

phosphomycin

FOS

60

7

40

Tetracycline

TE

0

0

1

Doxycycline

DXT

22

1

54

Table 3 Citrobacter koseri susceptibility profile
Source: Microbiology records

Antibiotics

Symbol

S

I

R

Ampicillin

AMP

1

0

114

Piperacilin

PIP

17

1

63

Amoxicillin

AML

0

0

91

ampicillin / sulbactam

AMS

14

0

91

Piperacilin / Tazobactam

TZP

55

4

78

Augmentín

AUG

3

1

20

Cefazoline

CFZ

8

0

57

Cefepime

FEP

45

2

88

Cefotaxym

CTX

20

0

78

Ceftriaxone

CRO

19

2

84

Ceftazidima

CAZ

23

2

102

Cefuroxym

CXM

22

4

116

Meropenem

MRP

80

3

51

Aztreonam

ATM

50

5

109

Table 4 Betalactam susceptibility profile
Source: Microbiology records

Antibiotics

Symbol

S

I

R

Gentamycin

GEN

51

2

120

Amikacin

AMK

56

4

35

Kanamycin

K

17

2

64

Tobramycin

TOB

19

1

36

Streptomycin

S

6

1

5

Table 5 Aminoglycoside susceptibility profile
Source: Microbiology records

Discussion

Documentation of medical institutions and health care services regarding nosocomial infections, registered around the world, report that they are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The high frequency of these infections ascertains the poor quality in the provision of health care services, which also causes high avoidable costs.

Several factors increase the frequency of infections associated with healthcare. Hospitalized patients often get immunocompromised; they undergo a vast number of medical examinations and treatments, most of them invasive. Health care procedures and the setting of the hospital allow the transmission of microorganisms between the hosts.9 In this study, the service with more strains was ICU, the patients are mostly inmunocompromised, they are subjected to invasive procedures, they are constantly manipulated by medical and nursing staff, and most patients are intubated. These are risk factors that influence the cause of infection.

Despite Citrobacter species are considered an unusual nosocomial pathogen, neonates and inmunocompromised patients are a frequent target of infections caused by these microorganisms. These conditions include sepsis, urinary tract infections, respiratory and intra-abdominal infections, and central nervous system Infections.1,11,12

C. koseri is a pathogen mostly isolated in urinary samples;12,13 however, this was not the case of the present study, since it was isolated in more than 50% of pus samples, which classifies it as a pathogen responsible for nosocomial infections.

Antimicrobials are the fundamental basis in the treatment of an infection, which is one of the most frequent problems in the health care systems, and the cause of greatest morbidity and mortality in any medical specialty.14-16

The selective pressure of antimicrobials, produced mostly by bacteria of environmental origin, led to a logical coevolution: the producing microorganisms, or those who share their ecological niche, developed resistance mechanisms to those same compounds as part of their own subsistence. Thus, the presence of antibiotics in a given environment not only selects changes in the characteristic genes of species that seek to survive their action, but also favors the lateral dissemination of these mechanisms from its original hosts to other bacterial species through mobile genetic elements such as transposons and plasmids. In the hospital setting, there is a great antibiotic selective pressure due to the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials; therefore, it is not surprising the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens. The use of antibiotics makes it even more difficult to control their rational use and generates a new source of selection of resistant bacteria that can disseminate later through food or the environment, as well as colonize the digestive tract of human beings. As a result, we are heading towards a period similar to that of when there were no antibiotics, with bacterial infections for which there is no treatment available, or in which alternatives are far from ideal (for example, old antibiotics in disuse due to their high toxicity, such as the polymyxins). Taking into account the scarce number of new developing antibiotics, the detection and monitoring of multidrug resistant bacteria becomes fundamental in order to define actions that improve the use of available antimicrobials and prevent the dissemination of resistant pathogens.17

Antimicrobial resistance is a global problem that has caused current therapeutics not to solve bacterial infections. Within the most important and high-impact current resistance mechanisms is the resistance to carbapenems in enterobacteriaceae (CRE), emerged as in most cases, as a consequence of the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in medicine. Among the enzymes capable of hydrolyzing the carbapenems and other β-lactam, can be underlined: Class A of Ambler: KPC-2 to 18; Class B: metallotamases (VIM 1 to 41 and IMP 1 to 48, and NDM-1 to NDM-12 and Class C: (detected in Acinetobacter spp.) OxA-23, OXA-25 to 27, OXA -40, OXA-51, OXA- 55, OXA-58 and OXA-143 (4).18

There is a broad family of bactericidal antibiotics, and betalactamics are one of the most numerous groups and of greater clinical use; they include penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams and carbapenems. Although the resistance to betalactamics is defined by different mechanisms (production of enzymes, alterations of the permeability, alteration of the target and, presumably, expression of active expulsion pumps), the main mechanism of resistance to betalactamics in enterobacteriaceae is enzymatic, due to the production of betalactamases.

C. koseri, presents low-level resistance to aminonicilines (ampicillin) and carboxypenicycilines (ticarcilin) ​​and decreased or intermediate sensitivity to ureidopenicillins (piperacilin), remaining sensitive to cephalosporins, monobactam (aztreonam), carbapenemic (imipenem) and associations with inhibitors of Betalactamase (Amoxicillin-AC. clavulanic) The hyperproduction of chromosomal beta-lactamase of Class A: This phenotype can be found in C. Koseri.7,13 In this research C. koseri presented high-level resistance to ampicillin, ceftazidime, cefuroxime and aztreonam, as well as moderate resistance to all antibiotics that were used in the study.

The behavior of an aminoglucoside before enterobacteria depends, at least, of 5 factors: a) passive diffusion through the outer membrane; b) active transportation through the inner membrane; c) the affinity of aminoglycoside for its target (a ribosomal protein); d) The methylation of unit 16 s of ribosomal RNA, and e) the presence of inactivating enzymes. However, the most important mechanism of resistance to aminoglycosides remains enzymatic inactivation. Three types of enzymes have been described: acetyltransferases (AAC) that produce the acetylation of an amino group of the antibiotic, phosphotransferases (APH) that phosphorylate a hydroxyl group and, finally, nucleotidyltransferases (ANT) that also adequate a hydroxyl group. Each enzyme recognizes a number of antibiotics aminoglycosides, which results in a phenotype of particular resistance. Most species of enterobacteria are naturally sensitive to aminoglycosides, AAC (20) confers resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin and neomycin, while the AAC enzyme (60) confers only a slight resistance to tobramicin, observing in the antibiogram by disk-diffusion zones of inhibition more reduced than for the rest of enterobacteriaceae, halos corresponding to CIM for this antibiotic. Mutations in this gene cause a hyperproduction of the enzyme that confers a high-level resistance to tobramicin, kanamycin and netilmicin and moderate to amikacin.7 For instance, Oxalis corniculata extract has intense antimicrobial activity against C. koseri.19,20

In this study C. koseri showed a high resistance to gentamicin, which is alarming since, as mentioned above, enterobacteriaceae are sensitive to aminoglycosides, besides the fact that this therapeutic option would no longer be available.

Conclusion

Citrobacter koseri is a bacterium that has always been frequently isolated in urinary tract infections, although is currently causing outbreaks of nosocomial infections, mainly, in intensive care units. Its isolation in purulent samples demonstrates skin colonization either by primary cause infections or transmitted by health care staff as it seems to be the case in this research. These many strains of Citrobacter koseri had been isolated in this institution in the period of a year, since Citrobacter freundii is the most studied species in clinical samples. It is now clear that Citrobacter koseri is able to develop multi-resistance to known antibiotics, acts as opportunistic and can colonize people in community, thus its dissemination should be controlled. The antibiotic that is being used to treat this infection is the colistin due to its efficiency in multi-resistance by Citrobacter freundii; this is the alternative considered so far. Due to its significance, this research is part of a developing institutional project to continue the study of other microbiological characteristics of this bacterium.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest between the authors.

References

  1. Negrete-González C, Turrubiartes-Martínez E, Briano-Macias M, et al. Plasmid Carrying blaCTX-M-15, blaPER-1, and blaTEM-1 Genes in Citrobacter spp. From Regional Hospital in Mexico. Infectious Diseases: Research and Treatment. 2022;15:11786337211065750.
  2. Yuan C, Yin Z, Wang J, et al. Comparative Genomic Analysis of Citrobacter and Key Genes Essential for the Pathogenicity of Citrobacter koseri. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2774.
  3. Soleimani M, Masoumi A, Tabatabaei AS. Citrobacter Keratitis: Predisposing Factors and Clinical Characteristics. Research square. 2021;1‒8.
  4. Azrak MA, Marcelo D, Zulma F. Absceso cerebral causado por una infección por Citrobacter koseri en un adulto. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2009;107(6):170‒172.
  5. Lechowicz M, Dąbek K, Majewska U, et al. Múltiples abscesos cerebrales causados ​​por Citrobacter koseri en un recién nacido prematuro: informe de un caso. Revista polaca de radiología. 2017;82:837–841.
  6. Machuca J, Agüero J, Miró E, et al. Prevalencia en España de mecanismos de resistencia a quinolonas en enterobacterias productoras de betalactamasas de clase C adquiridas y/o carbapenemasas. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2017;35(8):485–490.
  7. Navarro Risueño F, Miró Cardona E, Mirelis Otero B. Lectura interpretada del antibiograma de enterobacterias. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. 2002;20(5):225‒234.
  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 31st ed. CLSI supplement M100 (ISBN 978-1-68440-104-8 [Print]; ISBN 978-1-68440-105-5 [Electronic]. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, USA; 2021.
  9. Hortigoza L. Sociedad Española de Medicina Preventiva, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Informe global del Estudio de prevalencia de las infecciones nosocomiales en España. SEPH [Internet]. 2019;12(2):364‒369.
  10. Daza-Hernández AL, Arroyo-Escalante S, Bravo-Escobar GA. Identificación de Citrobacter koseri como nuevo patógeno en pacientes con rinitis crónica. An Orl Mex. 2014;59(1):1‒10.
  11. Bonasoni MP, Comitini G, Pati M, et al. Second Trimester Fetal Loss Due to Citrobacter koseri Infection: A Rare Cause of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM). Diagnostics. 2022;12(1):159.
  12. Paredes P, Gregory C, Salazar M, et al. Epidemiología de la infección del tracto urinario en niños, Hospital General de Ambato, Ecuador. Revista científica INSPILIP. 20171(2):1‒17.
  13. Campo-Urbina ML, Ortega-Ariza N, Parody-Muñoz A, et al. Characterization and susceptibility profile of uropathogens associated with the presence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women in the department of Atlántico, Colombia 2014-2015. Cross-sectional study. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2017;68(1):62‒70.
  14. Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance an control programs in preventing nosocomial infections U. S. Hospital. Am J Epidemiology. 1985;121(2):182‒205.
  15. Sedor J. Hospital acquired urinary tract infections associated with the indwelling catheter. Urol Clin North Am. 1999;26(4):821‒828.
  16. Soufir L. Attributable morbidity and mortality of catheter related septicemia in critically ill patiens: A matched, risk- adjusted cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 1999;20(6):396‒401.
  17. Jiménez Pearson MA, Galas M, Corso A, et al. Consenso latinoamericano para definir, categorizar y notificar patógenos multirresistentes, con resistencia extendida o panresistentes. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2019;43:e65.
  18. Ullauri González C, Freire Cuesta S. Citrobacter freundii multirresistente como agente etiológico de infección de vías urinarias. Kasmera. 2019;47(1):9‒13.
  19. Jubair N, Rajagopal M, Chinnappan S, et al. Review on the Antibacterial Mechanism of Plant-Derived Compounds against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria (MDR)". Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021;2021:3663315.
  20. Bottiglieri M, García ME, Amieva C, et al. Colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria in high-risk units of a multipurpose institution. Salud i Ciencia. 2016;22(1):47‒52.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2022 Cespedes, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.