Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2377-4312

Dairy, Veterinary & Animal Research

Correspondence:

Received: January 01, 1970 | Published: ,

Citation: DOI:

Download PDF

Abstract

This paper describes the forage development through farmer participatory research and enhancing farm profitability by establishing an innovative informal strategy of developing village-based forage seed enterprises (VBFSEs) of Berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) in Pakistan. The involvement of farmers in varietal selection and development is very important in ensuring the forage development and adoption of improved forage varieties in commercial production systems for increasing livestock productivity to enhance smallholder farmer’s livelihoods.

Keywords: forage production, varietal selection and evaluation, farm profitability, rural development

Introduction

Crop-livestock production is an integral part of the mixed farming systems in Pakistan and characterised by small-scale subsistence farming to produce food for meeting daily household dietary requirements. However, livestock productivity is very low and restricted by the lack of quality fodder due to unavailability of seed.1 The farmer participatory research approach elevates local knowledge to the role of science in food security by increasing productivity at the farm level. Collaborative experimentation with farmers can result in the identification of the better varieties (through selection), leading to increased forage yield and quality.2 Moreover, on-farm testing, selection and evaluation of improved varieties can result to the farmer-based seed production. Farmer seed enterprises serve markets through linking research and the commercial sector for the timely availability of good quality seed. Therefore, VBFSE is a potentially viable, alternative seed supply system where formal seed supply is a limiting factor for smallholder dairy farmers.

Materials and methods

On-farm research trials were conducted in Pakistan during 2012-2014, to establish the most appropriate seed source of Berseem clover with the aim of forage development to achieve maximum forage and seed production at farm level. A randomised complete block design and five replicates were used, where each research site was considered as replication. The three sources of Berseem clover were Farmer seed (FS), Market seed (MS) and Research station seed (RS). Data was recorded on green forage (GF), dry matter (DM) (t/ha) and seed yields (SY)(kg/ha) after multiple forage cuttings (65, 110 and 150days after sowing). Additionally, the major indicators of fodder nutrition were measured through near-infrared reflectance (NIR) to access the forage nutrition. The data were analysed with the linear mixed model (ASREML) by using GenStat® (17th edition) at 5% level of significance to compare treatment means. Partial budget analyses were also carried out using Microsoft Excel 2013®windows software to estimate the economic benefits.

Results and discussion

The different seed sources significantly (P<0.05) affected the forage and seed yields and forage quality parameters (Table 1) across all the experimental sites. The mean DM, GF and seed yields of 8.39, 60.79t/ha and 580kg/ha, respectively were produced by using RS as compared to FS or MS. The average nutritive value of the forage also significantly (P<0.05) affected by the seed source. However, WSC did not vary (P>0.05) between the different seed sources. Overall, RS produced better quality forage of Berseem clover compared to FS and MS (Table 1). The analysis further revealed that average net incomes of 279690 Rs/ha (2715 US$/ha) was earned through VBFSE development of Berseem clover in the study area having more returns (236%) as compared to conventionally grown forage (65%).

Seed quality of Berseem clover directly affects crop yields through plant growth, and indirectly influences the nutritive value of the forage. The frequent cuttings can be used to manipulate the distribution of DM, subsequently impacting on DM and seed yields of Berseem clover3 which was in agreement to the results reported in the present study. Smallholder farmers are often reluctant in adopting the improved technologies related to genetic improvement and production of fodder crops.4 David2 identified the introduction of improved varieties in smallholder farming systems has been found to not only significantly increase yields but also to result in the establishment of new markets for both the surplus forage and seed. The majority of the smallholder farmers are the primary source of local varieties germplasm and participatory approach has proved to be a workable strategy in the forage development.4 Moreover, 236% marginal rate of returns produced in the present study, more than the minimum rate of return (40-100%) which is acceptable to farmers in adopting any agricultural intervention.5

Seed Sources

DM Yield (t/ha)

Forage Yield (t/ha)

Seed Yield (kg/ha)

CP* (%)

DMD* (%)

NDF* (%)

ME*(MJ/kg DM)

WSC* (%)

Farmer Seed

5.75

43.63

186

26.34

67.38

30.12

9.93

2.559

Market Seed

6.47

49.04

204

25.61

67.27

30.53

9.87

2.653

Research Station Seed

8.39

60.79

580

27.13

68.97

28.72

10.13

2.815

SED**

0.51

2.95

40.13

0.81

1.45

1.24

0.1

0.28

Table 1 The effect of different seed sources on forage, seed yields, and quality of Berseem clover.

**SED=standard error of difference
*CP, crude protein; DMD, dry matter digestibility; NDF, neutrant detergent fiber; ME, metabolisable energy; WSC, water soluble carbohydrates

Conclusion

In conclusion, the RS produced the highest weight of green forage, DM and seed yields of better quality across all farm sites when taken three forage cuts at 65, 110 and 150 DAS prior to seed harvest. Moreover, the farmer participatory research approach and the establishment of VBFSE proved to be the realistic approach of bringing positive change at smallholder farmer’s level.

Acknowledgements

We are greatly thankful to Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) for providing funds to undertake this research project.

Conflict of interest

Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

Creative Commons Attribution License

© . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.