Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-4345

Dental Health, Oral Disorders & Therapy

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 3

Comparison of the existence of bruxism in different class students at the faculty of dentistry

Tuncdemir MT,1 Tigli HK,2 Uysal O2

1Department of Dentitry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey
2Department of Medicine, Bezmialem Vak?f University, Turkey

Correspondence: Makbule Tugba Tuncdemir, Necmettin Erbakan University, Dentistry Faculty, Karacigan Neighborhood, Ankara Street, 74/A Karatay/Konya, Turkey, Tel 903000000000

Received: April 12, 2018 | Published: June 8, 2018

Citation: Tuncdemir MT, Tigli HK, Uysal O. Comparison of the existence of bruxism in different class students at the faculty of dentistry. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2018;9(3):186-188. DOI: 10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00375

Download PDF

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of bruxism among the students attending Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Dentistry according to class by using a questionnaire and possible causes of this distribution.

Material and Method: A total of 396 students aged between 18 and 26 were included to the study. Before the study, the individuals were informed about the survey and they were allowed to fill the questtionnaires in private. SPSS 17 software and chi-square test was used for statistical analyses.

Results: Bruxism rate was found as 66.5%. Among the classes, the rates were 73.6%, 66.3%, 61.3%, 59.7% and 72.5% in first, second, third, fourth and fifth grades respectively. In females the bruxism rate was 75.2% and 51.7% in males. It was found that there was no significant difference among the classes (P>0,05) in bruxism rates and distribution of both sexes (P>0,05). Bruxism was higher in females than males, except for the first grade.

Conclusion: The bruxism rate that was higher in first grade was decreasing towards fourth grade but it was starting to increase again in fifth grade. Besides, the bruxism rate was higher in females than males, except for the first class. These results suggest that bruxism is closely related with stress.

Keywords: bruxism, dentistry, tress

Introduction

Bruxism is defined as a repetitive jawbone movement, characterized by the compression or grinding of teeth by pressing and/or moving the mandible. It is classified as a "parafunction" because it is not a functional target such as chewing, phonation or swallowing.1 It has a high prevalence in society, 32.4% in children, and 54.51% in adults.2,3 There are two daily cycles of strangulation, sleeping and awake.4 Bruxism, which is experienced in a state of alertness, is more likely to manifest itself as a reaction to stress and anxiety and manifested by the tightness of the jaw muscles.5 In sleep bruxism, both teeth clenching and tooth creaking are observed.6 When dealing with diagnosis, both types can be grouped as "possible" (according to one's own expression), "likely" (self-expression and clinical examination), and "definitive" (according to self-expression, clinical examination and polysomnographic records).4−7 According to the commonly accepted idea, the etiology of bruxism is multifactorial.8 Overloading of muscles due to tooth tightening in bruxism disrupts local blood flow and ischemia leading to pain.9 Although there is no definite relationship between bruxism and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders in the literature, studies show that there is a high positive correlation.7−10 Various techniques have been used to detect sleep bruxism. In this respect, the most advanced applications are polysomnography and electromyography. However, the high cost of operation and the difficulty of accessing this equipment limit their use and lead to more convenient methods such as surveys.3 The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of bruxism among the students of the dental faculty and to have knowledge about the distribution according to the classes.

 

Material and methods

A total of 396 students aged between 18 and 26 who attended the Faculty of Dentistry Studying at Necmettin Erbakan University participated. The only condition for participants to be included in the study was that they continued to study in various classes at the Faculty of Dentistry. Before the study, the individuals were informed about the research and were asked to complete the questionnaire form on their own (Table 1). Students who participated in the study were asked to fill in the questionnaire form about the bruxism appropriately (n=396). In the questionnaire form, it was accepted that there were habit of tightening teeth at the subjects who answered yes to at least two questions about bruxism etiology.11 Because our aim was to rate bruxism awareness according to the classes in the dental school, statistical analysis was done according to the classes. SPSS 17 program and chikare test were used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance level was accepted as p <0.05.

Name:                          

Surname:

Age:                                 

Class:

Gender

Are you aware of occasional or frequent creaking or tightening of your teeth while you sleep (Yes / No)

Has anyone ever told you that you creaked your teeth in your sleep? (Yes / No)

Do you feel pain or fatigue when you wake up?(Yes / No)

Did you feel fatigue or tension in your facial muscles when you wake up?(Yes / No)

Do you find your teeth tight when you wake up (Yes / No)

Have you ever woken up when your wake is locked and you cannot? (Yes No)

Do you wake up with a headache, backache or pain behind your tongue? (Yes No)

Do you think your teeth are worn out (Yes / No)

Do you feel your teeth are swinging when you wake up? (Yes No)

Do you have tenderness or pain in your teeth and gums when you wake up? (Yes No)

Do you have pain in your temples when you wake up? (Yes No)

Do you have difficulty in opening the mouth when you wake up? (Yes No)

Does your teeth have sensitivity to the cold? (Yes / No)

Are you aware that during the day you have no teeth or gnashing your teeth? (Yes No)

Table 1 Questinare form

Results

According to statistical analysis results, the ratio of bruxism among dental students was 66.5%. When the ratios according to the classes were examined, bruxism was found in 73.6% for the first class, 66.3% for the second class, 61.3% for the third class, 59.7% for the fourth class and 72.5% for the fifth class. Distribution of bruxism is seen according to class on Table 2. Bruxism was found to be 75.2% in females and 51.7% in males. Table 3 shows distribution according to the class and genders. There was no significant difference in terms of bruxism according to the classes (p=0,229) and there was no significant difference in terms of gender distribution according to the classes (p=0,141). Each class has its own sex; there is no difference in grade 1, but in other classes the rate of bruxism in women is significantly higher than in men.

Classes

          Bruxism

 

0

1

1

23

64

2

28

55

33,7%

66,3%

3

31

49

38,8%

61,3%

4

31

46

40,3%

59,7%

5

19

50

27,5%

72,5%

Table 2 Distribution of bruxism according to classes
0: No bruxism    1:Bruxism

                         Classes

                      Bruxism

 

0

1

1

gender

M

13

23

36,1%

63,9%

F

10

41

19,6%

80,4%

2

gender

M

16

18

47,1%

52,9%

F

12

37

24,5%

75,5%

3

gender

M

19

15

55,9%

44,1%

F

12

34

26,1%

73,9%

4

gender

M

15

12

55,6%

44,4%

F

16

34

32,0%

68,0%

5

gender

M

9

8

52,9%

47,1%

F

10

42

19,2%

80,8%

Table 3 Distribution of bruxism by class and gender
M:Male       F:Female        

Discussion

According to our research, the rate of bruxism in 396 individuals aged between 18 and 26 is 66.5%. This rate is consistent with the literature that Reding and colleagues found that bruxism most often occurs between the ages of 20-40.12 In the first year of the faculty, there was a high level of bruxism as high as 73.6% due to the difficulties of studying in the first year and the difficulties in the adaptation process. But it seems that this rate is gradually falling as much as the 4th class and it is falling as 59.7%. It may be thought that the reason for this is that the students are adapting to the school over time and learning to cope with their existing stress. However, it is noticed that the bruxism rate of the students in the last grade is clearly visible. It can be considered that the reason for this is that they are in a different process as in the first case. In other words, as the 5th Grade students can not finish both at school and at the end of the school year, the ambiguity and the uncertainty about what they will do will lead to increased stress and accompanying bruxism. Das and colleagues demonstrate compliance with the study of bruxism in 2015 that shows interest in emotional stress.13 Some studies have also shown that the rate of bruxism increases markedly in stressful situations such as work problems.14 As a result, the rate of bruxism in all classes except for grade 1 is higher in women than in men. We think that men are more comfortable in coping with problems than women and that this difference occurs because they can cope more easily with stress. The results of some studies in the literature are in parallel with our results.15−18 Allen and colleagues have reported that women are more likely to be bruxism than men.19 But in some studies it seems that there is no significant difference in the presence of bruxism compared to gender.20,21 Limitations of our work include adherence to the answer of the users as in all the questionnaires, and evaluation based on the subjective criteria and evaluation of the different parameters in the questionnaire. But it is an advantage for us to have a large number of participating samples. Our greatest advantage is that the people who answer the questions asked in the questionnaire are dental students. It may be thought that by responding to the questions in a more conscious way, we can achieve a more accurate result.

Conclusion

In our study, the distribution of bruxism in classes and sexes diagnosed after the survey was examined. As a result, the bruxism rate, which was high in the first grade, was found to show a decreasing rate as the fourth grade but it was found to increase again in the fifth grade. Except for the first year students, women had higher bruxism than men. All these results suggest that bruxism is closely related to stress. It is difficult to diagnose bruxism because it does not give objective data.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    
  1. Rugh JD, Harlan J. Nocturnal bruxism and temporomandibular disorders. Adv Neurol. 1988;49:329−431.
  2. Clementino MA, Siqueira MB, Serra-Negra JM, et al. The prevalence of sleep bruxism and associated factors in children: a report by parents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017;18:399‒404.
  3. Blanco Aguilera A, Gonzalez Lopez L, Blanco Aguilera E, et al. Relationship between self-reported sleep bruxism and pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(8):564–572.
  4. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(1):2–4.
  5. Lavigne GJ, Huynh N, Kato T, et al. Genesis of sleep bruxism: Motor and autonomic-cardiac interactions. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52(4):381‒384.
  6. Lavigne GJ, Kato T, Kolta A, et al. Neurobiological Mechanisms Involved in Sleep Bruxism. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(1):30–46.
  7. Jiménez-Silva A, Peña-Durán C, Tobar-Reyes J, et al. Sleep and awake bruxism in adults and its relationship with temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review from 2003 to 2014. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75(1):36–58.
  8. Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. Bruxism is mainly regulated centrally, not peripherally. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(12):1085–1091.
  9. Monteiro AA, Kopp S. Estimation of blood flow by 133Xe clearance in human masseter muscle during rest, endurance of isometric contraction, and recovery. Arch Oral Biol. 1988;33:561–565.
  10. Manfredini D, Lobbezoo F. Relationship between bruxism and temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of literature from 1998 to 2008. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(6):26–50.
  11. Nekora-Azak A, Yengin E, Evlioglu G, et al. Prevalence of bruxism awareness in Istanbul, Turkey. Cranio. 2010;28(2):122–127.
  12. Reding GR, Rubright WC, Zimmerman SO. Incidence of bruxism. J Dent Res. 1966;45(4):1198–1204.
  13. Das S, Gupta R, Dhyani M, et al. Headache secondary to sleep-related bruxism: A case with polysomnographic findings. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015;6(2):248–251.
  14. Hicks RA, Conti P. Nocturnal Bruxism and Self Reports of Stress-Related Symptoms. Percept Mot Skills. 1991;72(3 Pt 2):1182.
  15. Jensen R, Rasmussen BK, Pedersen B, et al. Prevalence of oromandibular dysfunction in a general population. J Orofac Pain. 1993;7:175–182.
  16. Ciancaglini R, Gherlone EF, Radaelli G. The relationship of bruxism with craniofacial pain and symptoms from the masticatory system in the adult population. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(9):842–848.
  17. Wedel A, Carlsson GE. A four-year follow-up, by means of a questionnaire, of patients with functional disturbances of the masticatory system. J Oral Rehabil. 1986;13(2):105‒113.
  18. Agerberg G, Bergenholtz A. Craniomandibular disorders in adult populations of West Bothnia, Sweden. Acta Odontol Scand 1989;47(3):129–140.
  19. Allen JD, Rivera-Morales WC, Zwemer JD. Occurrence of temporomandibular disorder symptoms in healthy young adults with and without evidence of bruxism. Cranio. 1990; 8(4):312–318.
  20. Glaros AG. Incidence of diurnal and nocturnal bruxism. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45(5):545–549.
  21. Melis M, Abou-Atme YS. Prevalence of Bruxism Awareness in a Sardinian Population. Cranio. 2003;21(2):144–151.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Tuncdemir, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.