Research Article Volume 5 Issue 6
Professor at Cairo University, United Arab Emirates
Correspondence: Nagi Amer, Professor at Cairo University, VILLA 90 NARGIS 4, United Arab Emirates, Tel 00971508422635
Received: August 30, 2016 | Published: September 27, 2016
Citation: Amer N (2016) Ultrasound Guided Motor Sparing Sensory Blocks for Hand and Fore Arm Surgery. J Anesth Crit Care Open Access 5(6): 00206. DOI: 10.15406/jaccoa.2016.05.00206
New methods for regional blocks are possible with ultrasound guidance. US-guided small nerves block requires medical skills thorough knowledge of sensory and motor innervations corresponding surgical site. Motor sparing sensory blocks are opted to obtain anaesthesia and analgesia for hand and distal upper limb surgery. They may be also used as supplementary option for brachial plexus block or to provide analgesia after a regional or a general anesthetic. Ultrasound guided Motor sparing sensory blocks per se may be used to obtain anaesthesia for minor hand procedures; therefore, reducing the complications of general anaesthesia and attaining pretty good postoperative analgesia with a decreased requirement for opioids. USGR techniques minimize the time taken for block performance, the dose of LA used, and the need for nerve stimulation, therefore improving patient satisfaction. Moreover, under direct visualization, the incidence of nerves injury and vessels penetration are reduced and therefore injection of LA into these structures is markedly decreased.
Whenever tourniquet anaesthesia is required, proximal brachial plexus block is done and associated with more motor paralysis. Therefore, sole reliance on peripheral arm blocks can only be used in operations that do not require a tourniquet or last less than 20 min. Successful blockade of the forearm and hand depends on knowledge of sensory and motor innervations as well as cutaneous nerve supply. Knowledge of the anatomical landmarks is of utmost importance for success.
Several variations exist in the neuro- anatomy of the forearm as described in textbooks. This variability and overlap of nerve supply mean that it is illogic to depend on the block of a single nerve supplying sensation to the operative field unless proper testing of sensory loss is obtained. Six nerves may be blocked around the elbow and provide anaesthesia for the forearm and hand. The following key points are important when performing these techniques:
Peripheral nerve block around the elbow and wrist provides excellent postoperative analgesia. US-guided small nerves block requires medical skills thorough knowledge of sensory and motor innervations corresponding surgical site. Motor sparing sensory blocks are opted to obtain anaesthesia and analgesia for hand and distal upper limb surgery. They may be also used as supplementary option for brachial plexus block or to provide analgesia after a regional or a general anesthetic. Ultrasound guided Motor sparing sensory blocks per se may be used to obtain anaesthesia for minor hand procedures; therefore, reducing the complications of general anaesthesia and attaining pretty good postoperative analgesia with a decreased requirement for opioids.
Superficial Radial Nerve at the mid of the forearm for hand surgery.
Although of the need of technical skills and high resolution machines, as well as limitation related to the use of tourniquet that may limit the duration of pain free period yet the benefits of motor sparing blocks make it pretty good alternative for pain free minor procedures both in the hand and forearm surgeries. The keys of success rely on:
Ultrasound guided Motor sparing sensory blocks alone may be used to provide anaesthesia for minor hand procedures; thus, sparing the patient the complications of general anaesthesia and providing excellent postoperative analgesia with a reduced requirement for opioid analgesics. Ultrasound guidance reduces the time taken for block placement, the dose of LA required, and the need for stimulation currents, improving patient comfort. Under direct visualization, the incidence of nerves injury and vessels penetration are reduced and therefore injection of LA into these structures is markedly decreased.
None.
The authors declare there is no conflict of interests.
None.
©2016 Amer. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.