Obese Patients: General or Combined Anaesthesia?

doi:10.15406/jaccoa.2014.01.00038

Journal of

eISSN: 2373-6437

Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access

Letter to Editor Volume 1 Issue 6

Obese Patients: General or Combined Anaesthesia?

Pérez Lara FJ,¹

Verify Captcha

Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.

Ramos Martinez E,² Del Rey A,³ Oliva Muñoz⁴

¹Digestive Surgeon, Antequera Hospital, Spain
²Anesthesiologist, Antequera Hospital, Spain
³UGC Director, Antequera Hospital, Spain
⁴Chief of Surgery Service, Antequera Hospital, Spain

Correspondence: Francisco Javier Pérez Lara, Hospital de Antequera, Secretaría de Cirugía (3º planta), Avenida Poeta Muñoz Rojas s/n, Antequera, Málaga, 29200, Spain, Tel 34637322133

Received: December 06, 2014 | Published: December 24, 2014

Citation: Lara PFJ, Martinez RE, Rey DA, Munoz OH (2014) Obese Patients: General or Combined Anaesthesia? J Anesth Crit Care Open Access 1(6): 00038. DOI: 10.15406/jaccoa.2014.01.00038

Download PDF

Letter to editor

In comparison with general anaesthesia, numerous studies have found that combined anaesthesia provides better analgesic quality and presents fewer cases of postoperative respiratory failure.¹ The use of combined general and epidural anaesthesia is well understood and commonly applied. This approach decreases anaesthetic requirements, makes it possible to carry out a postoperative analgesic strategy, can lower the blood loss and reduces postoperative complications such as respiratory failure and thrombosis.^2,3 Therefore, it is particularly indicated for obese patients undergoing surgical interventions, especially if a high rate of postoperative pain is to be expected.⁴

A good example of this situation is the patient who was treated at our hospital for a giant post-laparotomy hernia (Figures 1 & 2). This man, aged 52 years, had a clinical history of morbid obesity, obstructive sleep apnoea and intervention for appendicitis. Evaluation by the Mallampati test II revealed no predictor of difficult airway. An epidural catheter was inserted in the L2-L3 space, for Intraoperative analgesia. Small and large bowel loops were released from the hernia sac and reintroduced into the cavity. The bowel wall was then repaired by closing the sac flaps and inserting a mesh (Figures 3 & 4). Postoperative pain was controlled by an epidural infusion of ropivacaine plus fentanyl and rescue non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The patient reported good pain control and at 48 hours post-surgery the catheter was removed. The postoperative course was satisfactory and the patient was discharged from hospital after five days without incident of note.

Figure 1 Giant post-laparotomy hernia.

Figure 2 Giant post-laparotomy hernia.

Figure 3 Bowel wall repaired by closing the sac flaps and inserting a mesh.

Figure 4 Final outcome.

Given the patient’s background of obesity and respiratory problems, and the large size of the hernia and the possible duration of the intervention, we decided to apply combined anaesthesia, and thus obtain the advantages of epidural analgesia, i.e., less bleeding, better pain control, lower incidence of thrombotic events and fewer respiratory problems, among others.

Conclusion

We believe that for obese patients undergoing significant interventions, especially if they have respiratory problems or present a high risk of thrombosis, combined analgesia would be indicated (if anaesthesiologist has enough experience), thus improving comfort and reducing postoperative risks.