Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2572-8466

Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering

Research Article Volume 2 Issue 3

Ex-vitro propagation of micropropagated sugarcane (Sacharum officinarum L.) genotypes using plant growth regulators IBA and BAP

Belay Tolera,1 Gezahegn Terefe,1 Sunil TH2

1Department of Biology, Dilla University, Ethiopia
2Tthiopian Sugar Corporation, Ethiopia

Correspondence: Belay Tolera, Ethiopian Sugar Corporation, Research and Development Center, variety Improvement Research Program, Biotechnology Research Team, Wonji Research and Development Center, Wonji, Ethiopia, Tel 251-222200144, Fax 251-910181644

Received: January 10, 2017 | Published: February 27, 2017

Citation: Terefe G, Sunil TH, Tolera B. Ex-vitro propagation of micropropagated sugarcane ( Sacharum officinarum L.) genotypes using plant growth regulators IBA and BAP. J Appl Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;2(3):88-94. DOI: 10.15406/jabb.2017.02.00030

Download PDF

Abstract

Ex-vitro propagation of micropropagated sugarcane plantlets of three selected sugarcane genotypes was carried out with the objective of evaluating their propagation responses to the interaction effects of BAP and IBA. Accordingly, six levels of IBA (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 & 0.5mgL-1) and eight levels of BAP (0, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2 & 2.25mgL-1) with three sugarcane genotypes, each replicated three times were tested. The treatments were arranged in a factorial completely randomized design. Data on the number of tillers per shoot, average shoot length (cm) and number of active leaves per shoot were collected twice every 30th day after 30days of treatment application. Analysis of variance revealed that the interaction effects of BAP, IBA and the sugarcane genotypes was very highly significant (P<0.0001) on the number of tillers per shoot, average shoot length and number of active leaves per shoot. The optimum number of tillers per shoot (5.67), average shoot length (40.77 cm) and number of active leaves per shoot (6.97) were obtained at 0.1mg/l IBA+0.75mg/l BAP in C132-81. In C86-56, the optimum number of tillers per shoot (4.50) was obtained at 0.1mg/l IBA+1.5mg/l BAP while the maximum average shoot length (48.33cm) and maximum number of active leaves per shoot (7.67) were obtained at 0.2mg/l IBA+0.75mg/l BAP. In SP70-1284, the optimum number of tillers per shoot (6.43) was obtained at 0.3mg/l+1mg/l BAP with 16.05cm average shoot length and 4.87 active leaves per shoot. Thus, it can be deduced that production of an average of 5.5 plantlets per shoot within a month can be possible.

Keywords: ex-vitro propagation, sugarcane genotypes, C132-81, C86-56, SP70-1284, micropropagated, meristematic

Abbreviations

BAP, 6-benzylaminopurine; REGWQ, ryan-einot-gabriel- welsch; IBA, indole-3-butyric acid; IVPT, in-vitro propagation technology; DF, degree of freedom

Introduction

Sugarcane is a perennial grass which produces seed under suitable conditions, but for commercial production, it is propagated from stalk cuttings. Propagation through stalk cuttings is the traditional method of sugarcane propagation in which stalk cuttings containing one or more buds, termed sets are used for commercial planting.1 The Ethiopian Sugar Industry used this traditional method of propagation alone for the last 50 years till 2012. However, under the new plan of the Industry to expand the existing farms and establishment of vast sugarcane plantation projects with many high crushing capacity sugar factories, the tradition propagation method alone was seen to have various draw backs. Among these, availability of enough amount of quality disease free planting material within short time, transport of bulky unclean seed cane from existing farms to the remote project farms, the low rate of propagation (usually 1:10), lack of methods for fast commercialization of improved and adapted varieties, obsolation of productive commercial varieties due to disease, lack of alternative techniques for rejuvenation and disease cleansing of the old contaminated sugarcane varieties were the major limitations identified as challenges to the vast expansion and new development plans.2-3 With a view to minimize the challenges, microproagation technology was adopted and implemented to supplement the tradition method of sugarcane propagation in all sugar estates and projects. Microproagation Technology is a technique through which group of genetically identical plants all derived from a selected individual multiply vegetatively and rapidly by aseptic culture of meristematic regions under defined nutritional and controlled environmental conditions in vitro .4

Nowadays, unlike the traditional propagation method, it is the only practical means of achieving rapid and large scale production of disease free quality planting materials in sugarcane 5-7 and alternative approach for fast multiplication of a genotype in its original form. It is very effective in entire disease cleansing, rejuvenation and subsequent mass propagation of well adapted and promising varieties facing gradual deterioration in yield, quality and vigor due to accumulation of pathogens during prolonged vegetative cultivation and hence sustains the productive potential of sugarcane crops for a longer period.8-9 Furthermore, micropropagated sugarcane plants were reported to give superior in cane and sugar yield as compared to their donors under similar agronomic management systems.10-14 However, the Ethiopian Sugar Corporation is procuring the micropropagated sugarcane plantlets from different organizations where the cost of procurement is high (about US$ 0.205 per plantlet). The erratic supply, long distance transport of the delicate plantlets followed by reduced survival, the increasing demand of micropropagated plants with the subsequent procurement cost increment were found to be the major limitations for the profitability and sustainability of the microproagation technology. Therefore, this experiment was carried out with the objective to evaluate the effects of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) in vivo propagation of tissue culture raised sugarcane plantlets of three sugarcane genotypes (C132-81; C86-56 & SP70-1284) with a view to complement microproagation technology and to ensure continuous supply, cut down the cost of plantlets procurement and propagation of sufficient amount of quality planting materials at the farm gate nursery within short period of time.

Materials and methods

Study site

The study was carried out at Metahara sugarcane plantation, located at Eastern part of the country, at about 200 km away from the capital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Metahara Sugar estate is situated at 80 53’ N latitude and 390 52’ E longitudes at an altitude of 950 mas with a semi arid climatic condition.

Sources of planting materials

The experimental materials were in vitro propagated sugarcane genotypes of C132-81, C86-56 and SP70-1284. The primary acclimatized plantlets of these sugarcane genotypes were delivered with intact coco-peat from Mekelle Technology Institute Tissue Culture Laboratory and directly planted in white polyethylene bag (8cm diameter with 10 cm height) filled with mixture of Luvisol, sand and compost in the ratio of 8:2:1.

Experimental Design and treatments

The experimental design was Completely Randomized Design with factorial treatment combination arrangements. Three sugarcane genotypes (C132-81,C86-56 and SP70-1284) with six levels of IBA (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 mg L-1) and eight levels of BAP (0, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2 and 2.25 mg L-1) resulting in 3*6*8 = 144 treatment combination arrangements each replicated three times. Each plot contains 30 pots (one plantlet per pot).

Data collection

Data on the number of tillers per shoot shoot length and number of active leaves per shoot was collected from ten randomly selected plantlets at 30th and 60th days of treatment application.

Data analysis

The collected data were compiled and an average of the data was subjected to analysis of variance using SAS software version 9.1.3 while separation of significant means' was done using REGWQ (Ryan-Einot-Gabriel- Welsch) Multiple Range Test.

Result and discussion

Analysis of variance revealed that the interaction of Indole - 3 - butyric acid (IBA), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and sugarcane genotype have a very highly significant (BAP*IBA*Genotype = p < 0.001) effect on all the response variables tested: numbers of leaves per shoot, average shoot length and number of leaves per shoot in all the sugarcane genotypes tested: C132-81, C86-56 and SP70-1284 (Appendix 1).

Comparison of the sugarcane genotypes revealed that all the three sugarcane genotypes showed marked variation in all the responses tested: number of tillers per shoot, average shoot length and number of leaves per shoot (Appendix 2). Regardless of the other treatments, comparison of the sugarcane genotypes showed that SP70-1284 produced the highest number of tillers per shoot while C86-56 gave the highest average shoot length (37.28 cm) and maximum number of active leaves (6.36) per shoot (Appendix 2). In sugarcane genotype C132-81, the lowest number of tillers per shoot (1.63) was found on 0 mg/l IBA+ 0mg/l BAP (control treatment) with 27.27 cm average shoot length and 4.00 leaves per shoot (Table 1). However, increasing the concentration of IBA from 0mg/l to 0.1mg/l and BAP from 0 mg/l to 0.75mg/l, increased the number of tillers per shoot from 1.63 to 5.67, average shoot length from 27.72 cm to 40.77 cm and number of leaves from 4.00 to 6.97. The maximum number of tillers per shoot (5.67), highest average shoot length (40.77 cm) and number of leaves per shoot (6.97) was obtained at 0.1mg/l IBA and 0.75mg/l BAP in sugarcane genotype C132-81 (Table 1). Holding the concentration of BAP at 0.75 mg/l and increasing the concentration of IBA beyond 0.1 mg/l up to 0.5 mg/l showed a declining trend in number of tillers per shoot, average shoot length (cm) and number of leaves per shoot.

PGRs(mg/l)

C132-81

Plant Growth Regulators (mg/l/plot)

Number of tillers per shoot

Average Shoot Length(cm)

Number of active leaves per shoot

IBA

BAP

0

0

1.63z

27.27w

4.00e

0.1

0.75

5.67c

40.77w

6.97ab

0.2

0.75

3.20op

36.87k

6.80b

0.3

0.75

2.80j

30.50s

5.90c

0.4

0.75

2.70t

29.67t

5.17f

0.5

0.75

2.63v

29.03u

4.93fg

0.1

1

2.60jk

36.80k

6.03c

0.2

1

2.60jk

34.40n

6.47b

0.3

1

3.73k

29.13u

6.23bc

0.4

1

3.53l

27.07w

6.13bc

0.5

1

3.20op

27.00w

6.00c

0.1

1.25

2.43x

27.33w

5.87c

0.2

1.25

2.40x

27.50v

5.90c

0.3

1.25

2.93s

33.17o

6.00c

0.4

1.25

3.07q

35.73i

6.63b

0.5

1.25

3.43n

36.27k

6.40b

0.1

1.5

2.87s

34.60m

6.03c

0.2

1.5

2.93r

27.77w

6.10bc

0.3

1.5

2.57v

28.30u

6.27bc

0.4

1.5

2.60v

33.53n

5.80c

0.5

1.5

2.77t

35.27n

5.53d

0.1

1.75

4.00i

37.40j

6.60b

0.2

1.75

3.00r

32.67p

6.13bc

0.3

1.75

3.00r

32.90o

6.33bc

0.4

1.75

2.70u

28.53u

6.27bc

0.5

1.75

2.20y

27.27w

5.80c

0.1

2

2.53w

32.20q

5.70cd

0.2

2

2.87t

38.20j

5.93c

0.3

2

3.17op

32.53q

6.27bc

0.4

2

3.20op

26.73w

5.97cd

0.5

2

2.83t

37.73j

6.50b

0.1

2.25

2.23y

33.17o

5.50d

0.2

2.25

2.10y

34.33n

5.60c

0.3

2.25

2.47w

31.67s

5.87c

0.4

2.25

2.97r

30.77s

4.03ab

0.5

2.25

2.40w

30.67s

3.60cd

CV

7.6

12.7

6.6

Mean ± SE

0.36

2.45

0.22

Table 1 Interaction effects of IBA and BAP on ex-vitro multiplication of sugarcane genotype C132-81.
Values (Mean ± SE) in the table indicate superscripts with the same letter are not significantly different.

Similarly, at 1mg/l BAP, increasing the concentration of IBA from 0.1 up to 0.3 mg/l showed an increasing trend in the number of tillers per shoot and number of leaves per shoot while further increase revealed a decreasing effect in both response variables (Table 1). For the response variable shoot length, increasing the concentrations of IBA from 0.1 up to 0.5 at 1mg/l BAP showed a decreasing effect. Generally, for in vivo proliferation of sugarcane genotype C132-81, 0.1 mg/l IBA with 0.75 mg/l BAP give the optimum growth response for number of tillers per shoot, average shoot length (cm) and number of leaves per shoot. Further increase in either of the growth regulators or both has no any biological and economic advantage (Table 1). In sugarcane genotype C86-56, the lowest number of tillers per shoot(1.50) and average shoot length(22.67 cm) was found on the control treatment(0mg/l IBA and BAP) while the lowest number of leaves per shoot (4.10) was obtained at 0.5mg/l IBA and 2.25 mg/l BAP (Table 2). In C86-56, increase in the number of tillers per shoot from 1.50 to 2.67; average shoot length from 22.67 cm to 34.00 cm and number of leaves per shoot from 4.70 to 7.00 was obtained as a result of 0.1 mg/l IBA + 0.75 mg/l BAP (Table 2). At 0.75 mg/l BAP, increasing the concentration of IBA from 0.1 mg/l to 0.2mg/l, increased the number of tillers per shoot, average shoot length and number of leaves per shoot from 2.67 to 33, 34 cm to 42 cm and 7.00 to 7.67, respectively.

PGRs(mg/l)

C86-56

Plant Growth Regulators (mg/l/plot)

Number of tillers per shoot

Average Shoot Length(cm)

Number of active leaves per shoot

IBA

BAP

0

0

1.50z

21.67y

4.70fg

0.1

0.75

2.67u

34.00n

7.00ab

0.2

0.75

3.33o

42.00f

7.67a

0.3

0.75

3.33o

37.00k

6.33bc

0.4

0.75

3.33o

31.33s

6.67ab

0.5

0.75

2.67u

29.33t

6.33bc

0.1

1

2.43x

44.67c

6.00c

0.2

1

2.90s

47.67b

6.03c

0.3

1

3.00r

33.67n

6.67ab

0.4

1

3.33r

32.00p

6.33bc

0.5

1

3.33r

30.67s

6.00c

0.1

1.25

2.67u

28.33

5.67cd

0.2

1.25

3.33o

29.67t

6.33bc

0.3

1.25

3.67k

37.00k

6.00c

0.4

1.25

3.67k

37.33j

6.83ab

0.5

1.25

3.67k

37.33j

7.00ab

0.1

1.5

4.50g

47.67b

8.00a

0.2

1.5

3.33r

25.67xy

6.33bc

0.3

1.5

3.37r

28.67u

5.67cd

0.4

1.5

3.60k

38.33j

6.67ab

0.5

1.5

3.67k

48.33a

6.00c

0.1

1.75

3.47m

43.33e

5.97c

0.2

1.75

3.33o

41.33g

7.33ab

0.3

1.75

2.67u

33.00n

6.00c

0.4

1.75

2.63u

32.07r

6.33c

0.5

1.75

2.33u

32.00r

6.00c

0.1

2

3.33o

40.33h

6.67ab

0.2

2

3.33o

47.67b

6.67ab

0.3

2

3.03o

42.00f

6.73ab

0.4

2

3.33o

37.00k

7.00ab

0.5

2

2.67u

25.67xy

6.67ab

0.1

2.25

2.67u

30.67s

6.00c

0.2

2.25

2.67u

38.67j

6.00c

0.3

2.25

3.33o

44.00c

5.67cd

0.4

2.25

3.27op

47.33b

4.33ab

0.5

2.25

2.67k

41.00g

4.10ab

CV

7.6

12.7

6.6

Mean ± SE

0.36

2.45

0.22

Table 2 Interaction effects of IBA and BAP on ex-vitro multiplication of sugarcane genotype C86-56.
Values (Mean ± SE) in the table indicate superscripts with the same letter are not significantly different.

However, further increase in the concentration of IBA at 0.75 mg/l BAP has no positive effect on neither of the response variables (number of tillers per shoot, average shoot length and number of leaves per shoot) tested. For this genotype (C86-56), the maximum number of tillers per shoot (4.50) was obtained at 0.1 mg/l IBA + 1.5mg/l BAP while the highest average shoot length (48.33 cm) and maximum number of leaves per shoot (7.67) was obtained at 0.5 mg/l IBA + 1.5 mg/l BAP and 0.2 mg/l IBA + 0.75 mg/l BAP, respectively. In sugarcane genotype SP70-1284, the lowest number of tillers per shoots (2.50) was obtained on the control treatment (0mg/l IBA + 0mg/l BAP) while the maximum number of tillers per shoot (6.43) was obtained at 0.3 mg/l IBA along with 1.0 mg/l BAP with 16.05 cm average shoot length and 4.87 leaves per shoot (Table 3). At 1.0 mg/l BAP, further increase in the concentration of BAP from 0.3 mg/l to 0.4 mg/l decreased the number of tillers per shoot from 6.43 to 5.57 (Table 3). The rate of sugarcane propagules multiplication depends upon auxin - cytokinine balance.11 A low concentration of auxin is often beneficial in conjunction with higher levels of cytokinine during shoot multiplication and exogenous auxin does not promote auxiliary shoot proliferation; however, their presence in growth medium may improve the plant growth. Although cytokinines are known to stimulate cell division, but does not induce DNA synthesis. Nevertheless, the presence of auxin promotes DNA synthesis. Hence, the presence of auxin together with Cytokinine stimulates cell division and control morphogenesis thereby influences shoot multiplication.2-3

PGRs(mg/l)

SP70 -1284

Plant Growth Regulators (mg/l/plot)

Number of Tillers/Shoot

Average Shoot Length(cm)

Number of active leaves/Shoot

IBA

BAP

0

0

2.50w

26.33x

6.00c

0.1

0.75

5.63c

29.23t

5.13f

0.2

0.75

4.53g

31.13s

5.40e

0.3

0.75

3.67k

25.83x

5.60d

0.4

0.75

4.10i

26.57x

5.73cd

0.5

0.75

3.73k

29.60t

5.13f

0.1

1

3.23o

41.30g

5.07f

0.2

1

3.70k

32.50r

4.83fg

0.3

1

6.43a

16.05z

4.87fg

0.4

1

5.57d

37.80j

5.23f

0.5

1

4.90ef

26.70x

5.53cd

0.1

1.25

4.07i

25.40y

5.13f

0.2

1.25

4.00i

29.40t

5.17f

0.3

1.25

4.13i

41.30g

5.07f

0.4

1.25

4.13i

34.17n

4.97f

0.5

1.25

5.33e

24.67xy

5.00fg

0.1

1.5

5.73b

24.60xy

5.27f

0.2

1.5

4.03i

25.97y

5.57vd

0.3

1.5

4.33h

26.73x

5.67d

0.4

1.5

4.37h

37.47j

4.93fg

0.5

1.5

4.33h

37.67j

5.00f

0.1

1.75

4.37h

31.33s

5.00f

0.2

1.75

5.67d

26.33s

5.00f

0.3

1.75

5.00e

26.40s

5.27f

0.4

1.75

3.83j

24.00xy

5.50cd

0.5

1.75

3.57l

22.60y

5.10fg

0.1

2

4.53g

36.90k

4.87fg

0.2

2

4.00i

39.80i

5.37f

0.3

2

3.60k

31.63s

4.93fg

0.4

2

3.57kl

22.93y

4.90fg

0.5

2

3.10r

22.60y

5.60cd

0.1

2.25

4.03i

26.30x

5.30d

0.2

2.25

4.47g

28.70v

4.87fg

0.3

2.25

4.60f

39.83i

4.97fg

0.4

2.25

4.17i

39.67i

5.03fg

0.5

2.25

4.00i

26.27x

5.73cd

CV

7.6

12.7

6.6

Mean ± SE

0.36

2.45

0.22

Table 3 Interaction effects of IBA and BAP on ex-vitro multiplication of sugarcane genotype SP70-1284.
Values (Mean ± SE) in the table indicate superscripts with the same letter are not significantly different.

Source of Variation

DF

Mean Square

Number of Tillers/Shoot

Average Shoot length(cm)

Number of leaves/shoot

IBA

4

1.05*

43.08*

0.54**

BAP

6

2.82***

709.77***

1.89***

IBA*BAP

24

1.11***

71.49***

0.43***

Gen

2

45.34***

1110.21***

24.17***

IBA*Gen

8

0.83*

16.36ns

0.12ns

BAP*Gen

12

2.26***

142.78***

0.98***

IBA*BAP*Gen

48

2.64***

30.31***

1.36***

Appendix 1: Summary for ANOVA on the interaction effects of BAP, IBA and sugarcane genotypes.
Remark: P≤ 0.0001= ***; P > 0.0001 and P < 0.001= ** P > 0.001 and P < 0.05 = *; P > 0.05 = ns

Genotype

Number of tillers/shoot

Average shoot length(cm)

Number of leaves/shoot

C86-56

3.02c

37.28a

6.36a

C132-81

3.20b

32.94b

6.14b

SP70-1284

4.45a

30.13c

5.19c

Appendix 2: Comparison of sugarcane genotypes to the interaction effects of IBA, BAP and Sugarcane genotypes.

Remark: Letters with the same letter are not significantly different.

Conclusion

The conventional method of sugarcane planting material propagation has many limitations while microproagation technology is efficient to solve all the limitations, However continuous and sustainable supply of micropropagated plants is erratic and unreliable besides the costly production or procurement cost challenging the use of the technology. Hence, In-vitro propagation technology (IVPT) was developed to complement tissue culture technology, but reproducibility of the IVPT protocols is dependent on the genotype, environmental weather conditions, soil types and mixture (ratios) used, plant growth regulators types and concentrations and interaction of the factors used. Therefore, the aim of this study was to optimize ex-vitro propagation protocol for three recently released sugar genotypes: C132-81, C86-56 and SP70-1284 using IBA and BAP. The result proved that Ex-vitro propagation of the sugarcane genotypes tested is highly dependent on the interaction effects of IBA, BAP and the sugarcane genotypes. Treatment combination containing 0.1 mg/l IBA + 0.75 mg/l BAP for C132-81, 0.1 mg/l IBA + 1.5mg/l BAP for C86-56 and 0.3 mg/l IBA + 1.0 mg/l BAP for SP70-1284 were found to give the optimum ex-vitro proliferation responses. Thus, from this result, it can be deduced that this result can be used to produce sufficient quantity (5.5 plantlets per shoot within a month) of quality planting materials and therefore can guarantee sustainable supply of planting materials with the lowest possible cost (possible to produce a plantlet with US$ 0.05 against the procurement cost of US$ 0.225 per plantlet).

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ridge R. IPI Bulletin No. 21: Fertilizing for High Yield and Quality-Sugarcane. Australia: IPI Publications; 2013. 117 p.
  2. Tolera B. In Vivo Proliferation of In Vitro propagated sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) genotypes at Tana-beles sugar development project, North-Western Ethiopia. Cell Dev Biol. 2015;4:161.
  3. Tolera B, Diro M, Belew D. Response of Sugarcane (Sacharum officinarum L.) Varieties to BAP and IAA on In vitro Shoot multiplication. Adv Crop Sci Tech. 2014;2:126.
  4. Ahloowalia BS, Prakash J, Savangikar VA, et al.Low cost options for tissue culture technology in developing countries: proceedings of a technical meeting organized by the joint FAO/IAEA division of nuclear techniques in food and agriculture and held in Vienna 26-30 August 2002. Austria: Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency; 2002. 106 p.
  5. Lal N, Krishna R. Sugarcane and its problems: Tissue culture for pure and disease free seed production in sugarcane. Indian sugar. 1994;44:847–848.
  6. Lorenzo JC, Ojeda E, Espinosa A, et al. Field performance of temporary immersion bioreactor derived sugarcane Plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2001;37(6):803–806.
  7. Krishnamurthi M, Tlaskal J. Fiji disease resistant: Saccharum officinarum L.var. Pindar sub clone from tissue culture. Proc ISSCT. 1994;13:130–137.
  8. Sreenivasan TV, Sreenivasan J. Microproagation of sugarcane varieties for increasing cane yield. SISSTA sugar J. 1992;18:61–64.
  9. Anonymous. Microproagation: A Tissue culture technique in sugarcane. India: Indian Institute of sugarcane Research; 2002.
  10. Ibrahim M, Tolera B, Aman J, et al. Evaluation of Tissue culture raised sugarcane planting materials against their donor conventional seed sources as initial sources of seed cane at Tendaho sugar development project, North-Eastern Ethiopia. J Hortic. 2016;3:168.
  11. Sood N, Kumar Gupta P, Srivastava RK, et al. Comparative studies on field performance of micropropagated and Conventionally propagated sugarcane plants. Plant Tissue Cult & Biotech. 2006;16(1):25–29.
  12. Comstock JC, Miller JD. Yield comparison: Disease free tissue cultures versus bud propagated planted sugarcane plants and healthy versus yellow leaf virus infected plants. Journal American Society Sugar Cane Technologists. 2004;24:31–40.
  13. Cox M, Hogarth M, Smith G. Cane breeding and improvement. In: Hogarth M, et al, editors. Manual of cane growing. Bureau of Sugar Experimental Stations, Australia; 2000. p. 91–108.
  14. Geetha S, Padmanabhan D. Effect of hormones on direct somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane. Sugar Tech. 2001;3(3):120–121.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Terefe, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.