Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2572-8466

Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering

Review Article Volume 9 Issue 2

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is more than a special agent for biological control of pests

Juan Manuel Sanchez–Yanez,1 Jose Luis Rico,2 Gerard Ulíbarri3,4

1 Microbiología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigación en Química y Biología, México
2Catálisis, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, México
3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Laurentian University, Canada
4Translational Research Institute, México

Correspondence: Juan Manuel Sanchez–Yanez, Microbiologia Ambiental, Instituto de Investigación en Química y Biologia, México

Received: February 08, 2022 | Published: March 23, 2022

Citation: : Sánchez–Yáñez JM, Rico JL, Ulíbarri G. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is more than a special agent for biological control of pests. J Appl Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022;9(2):33-39. DOI: 10.15406/jabb.2022.09.00282

Download PDF

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a bacterial genus known mainly for its capability to synthesize, in addition to spores, a parasporal body or crystal (δ––endotoxin), comprised of proteins which are toxic to pest insects, i.e., Coleoptera, Diptera and Lepidoptera, and other orders. As well as plant pathogenic nematode and many other applications as endophytic plant growth promoting bacteria, or cleaning enviornmental form some chemicals polluting agents, and even in human medicine for cancer prevention. The Bt coexists in a close relationship with insects to which eventually infects and poisons. It is likely that these unfavorable changes occurred during the evolutionary pathway in the interactions Bacillus–insect, which resulted in the present biochemical diversity between these species. The goal of this minireview is to show role of Bt in comparation with other genus Bacillus and explain why Bt is of interest for biological control of pests in conventional, protected and organic agriculture regarding other biotechnological applications to fully exploit the beneficial potential of Bt.

Keywords: pest biological control, endophytic plant promoting bacteria, bioremediation, cancer prevention

Introduction

The genus and specie called Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is well known as an entomotoxic and/or entomopathogenic bacteria used against insect pests (IP) in agriculture and public health, today a key tool in Biological Control of the following orders: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Homoptera, Orthoptera and Phthiraptera.1–30 Bt is applied to biological control of important human diseases which vectors are insects (VHD) belonging to the Diptera order with following genus involved in: malaria; Anopheles, dengue; Aedes, yellow fever; Aedes and Haemogogus, chikungunya; Aedes and zika; Aedes. The spores and crystals of Bt israelensis can intoxicate the young stage of larvae of a wide variety of Diptera, especially when solar radiation is minimal, Bt it is considered an ecological option to control these vector insects, although the lack of sufficient research on the persistence of Bt israelensis spores and crystals to the various aquatic conditions where oviposit mosquitoes limits a widespread application that ensures the disappearance of these vector insects for diseases of global importance.1,3,4,18,28 Also, there is evidence that certain varieties of Bt can intoxicate and infect arthropods classified as part of the spiders, since some genera and species attack agricultural crops of commercial value, research in this regard is promising with the expectation that new varieties of Bt will be apply for the biological control of mites in substitution of chemical pesticides.5,20,21  One of the most interesting proprieties of Bt in human epidemiology its genetic capacity29 for controlling snail of genera Milax gagates vector of the parasitic human and animal helminths such as Angiostrongglus costaricensis, Angiostoma margaretae and Cryptosporidium parvum. As well as the genus of snail Biomphalaria, vector of a trematode Schistosoma mansoni of importance in public health in the world.6 In addition, it has been reported that Bt crystals are also an alternative for the biological control of nematodes of veterinary importance such as the ruminant genera Haemonchus, Teladorsagia, Nippostrongylus and Ancylostma through a toxic action of these Bt crystals on the juvenile forms of these nematodes.7,8 There is evidence that certain varieties of Bt synthesize crystals that are toxic to genera and species of phytopathogenic nematodes as the well–known Meloidogyne hapla responsible for millions of losses in agriculture, especially because chemical control causes serious problems for human health and environmental pollution.8,19 Beside this fact related to pest control. Another application of Bt for sustainable agriculture its ability to invade the root system and phylloplane25 of various families of plants of commercial value as an endophyte, in which it can optimize the dose of mineral nitrogen fertilization, also is able to solubilize of phosphates to facilitate mineral absorption that allows plants to plants face soils with problems of elements necessary for agricultural production. While it can act in consortium with other genera and species of microorganisms that promote plant growth: actinomycetes, with mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria for different domestic crops.9–12 

 In terms of human health dealing with preventing several types of cancer there are reports that showed that parasporal crystals of Bt have anticancer activity, as well as the well–known MOLT–4, A549 associated to human lung cancer including HeLa (human uterus cervix cancer) cells, crystal from some strains Bt showed different toxicity like A1190 and A1462) were capable to destroy leukemic and normal T–cells, now those Bt proteins are called parasporin–2, 3, and 4 (PS2, PS3, PS4) to apply in treatment for preventing several types of cancer.13–15

Bt is regarding an ecological tool for recovering soil polluted by some pesticides, in that sense Bt is capable of synthesizing probiotics: organic substances and enzymes21 that induce the mineralization of environmental toxins. This is the case of an organophosphate pesticide known as chlorpyrifos used in the control of domestic and agricultural insect pest. In the soil, chlorpyrifos at a relatively high concentration of 70 mg/Kg of soil can be effectively eliminated over a period of 80 days by the application of a Bt probiotic, analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography, which showed that this probiotic induced the mineralization of chlorpyrifos, which allowed the reuse of the soil without causing negative environmental collateral effects.16  Bt exert their toxicity by crystal proteins (δ––endotoxins) or other toxins synthesized during its growth and sporulation.14,17–21 Such proteins are very specific and safe to mammals’ toxicity tests of Bt protein crystals for humans and animals support that the ingestion of these proteins does not allow them to solubilize, the Cry proteins rapidly degrade after being ingested. While both humans and animals lack specific recognition receptors for Cry proteins, necessary for them to be active. Consequently, no toxicity was detected when the dose for laboratory animals was oral. While there is no evidence of infection in rats, no skin damage was detected from the Cry proteins of Bt.13,22–24  

Mode of action of Bt crystals on insect pests

In contrast, consumption of the crystal proteins by insects causes disturbances and eventually their death.26,27,31–34 It is believed35–39 that the first step of the Bt toxin is the recognition of target receptor or molecules located within or on the membrane surface of epithelial cells of the midgut of a susceptible insect. Although, the specific binding of Cry toxin proteins to brush border membrane vesicle (BBMV) of midgut has been reported,11,28,39,40–44 less is known about the binding of Vip toxins. Recently, it has been suggested that the Vip3Aa toxin is bound specifically to a 48–kDa protein present at the BBMV prepared from the midgut epithelial cells of black cutworm (Agrotis ipsilon) larvae.43,44  Biopesticides based on Bt were first commercialized in France in 1930 to destroy insects in agricultural crops as well as urban plagues, i.e., Coleoptera, Diptera and Lepidoptera.22,23,34,45–47 However, Bt also infects and kills beneficial insects such as: Bómbix mori, Danaus plexippus.48 There exists a large variety of insects which are not considered IPs neither VHDs,18,22,23,30,41,49 Biopesticides and anti–pest crops have been developed by genetically modifying the crops with Bt genes, resulting in thousands of Bt strains isolated and studied.4,20,21,50–54 However, the evolution of resistance of pests to the insecticidal proteins from Bt produced by transgenic crops is drastically reducing the effectiveness of this method.50,55–61 Indeed, in 2005 was reported that 1 out of 13 insect species were vulnerable to transgenic crops, whereas eight years later, 5 out of 13 had developed resistance to Bt modified crops.44,62 The sporulation of Bt could happen in soil, water or air,63 however, it is generally accepted that it occurs inside the guts of insects18,21,40,42,49,64 and inside other animals such as birds.65 Although Bt is considered a typical bacterium, its sporulation in different environmental conditions may not occur, in contrast to Bacillus cereus.30,66 In addition, a physiological difference between Bt and other members of the Bacillus species is the genetic stability to continuous sporulation. There are several reports in the literature which mention that Bt easily loses its sporulation capacity, under certain environmental conditions, providing strong evidence of a difference in the extrachromosomal DNA compared to other species.67,68 Furthermore, the spores of the Bt are sensible to light and susceptible to some very specific pesticides, which is a drawback of the spore–crystal complex for foliar application.69 However, Bt spores have been isolated from leaves of domestic and wild plants,70 albeit susceptible to UV irradiation71–77 It is still unclear whether these spores were transported by wind, insects or were merely isolated cases.73 In another study, Ignoffo et. al. reported in 197878 that the viability was lost in less than 48h after aspersion of Bt spores on young leaves of corn and bean plants79 which was attributed to solar irradiation.78 It is believed that the Bt spores lack certain proteins that protect them against physical elements, this protection is a typical and basic characteristic of most spores of the Bacillus genus.73,80 The lack of these proteins, partially explains the poor stability of the Bt spores to solar.32,81 In contrast, the spores of Bacillus cereus reproduce and are resistant to solar irradiation, an advantage that is utilized to control pathogenic bacteria on leaves of commercial plants.65,74

Ecology of Bacillus thuringiensis

The spores of Bt are also sensitive to heavy metals: aluminium (Al), cupper (Cu), lead (Pb), etc, another aspect of the physiology of the Bt is its incapacity to sporulate under nutritional stress conditions30,80 contrary to other members of the genus Bacillus that do not require mineral medium or glucose in order to induce sporulation.73 Research using Bt showed that the genetically modified serotypes from Northern Mexico, as well as the Howard Raylord Deuchman strands from the U.S. Anti–doping Agency,81 were incapable of growing in a mineral media, or in soil extracts used as growing media. In contrast, when B. cereus is introduced in the same media, it rapidly sporulates as most known saprobic Bacillus species do.82

It is generally accepted that Paenibacillus (before called: Bacillus) is a genus capable of atmospheric nitrogen fixation, which was expected since the species Bacillus subtilis, B. lincheniformis, and B. cereus grow and survive in soils with deficiency in.30,80 These findings suggest that nutrients of Bt are obviously distinct to the rest of the Bacillus genus, which supports the hypothesis of its relationship and biochemical dependency on insects. As typical soil bacteria, Bt is incapable to synthetize vitamins or other compounds essential for its survival, in contrast to B. cereus or other species of this genus.5,30,35,83,84

Autecology of spore and crystals of Bacillus thuringiensis

Table 1 shows some of the diversity of Bt–based pesticides used to control pest insects in agricultural crops, stored grains, apiculture, forestry and urban areas.37,82,85 Several North American30 and European companies produce a variety of Bt formulations, geared to create different environmental, natural and artificial, applications. Some of these formulations are encapsulated in order to avoid the rapid denaturalization of the δ–endotoxin, such as MVP and M–One Plus commercialized by Mycogen. These products are efficient at Lopelluis controlling insects on infected leaves, as well as in aquatic environments.86 The aforementioned unjustified the use of Bt–transgenic seeds in agriculture due to unknown risks associated with ecological factors and human health.20,29,35,85,87,88 However, many reports have showed that crystal of proteins of Bt remnants from any application are binding to some physicochemical soil properties such as clay and humic acids by doing so these proteins has potential hazard to beneficial native animals like insects still not well known, in that sense research must be done in order to establish environmental rules to regulate any Bt–transgenic to prevent ecological disaster.89–93

Commercial product   

Company     

Bacillus thuringiensis
subspecies/varieties

Crop to protect

Bactospeine

Duphar

Kurstaki

Vegetables, fruits stored grains

Biobit

Novo labs      

Condor

Ecogen

Cutlass

Ecogen

Dipel

Abbot labs

Javelin

Sandoz

Larvo Bt

Knoll labs

MVP

Encapsulated Kurstaki

Certain

Sandoz

Aizawai

Honey producers

Skeetal

Novo labs

Israelensis

Toxic to mosquitoes

Teknar

Sandoz

Vectorbac

Abbot labs

M-One

Sandoz

San Diego

Stored grains, potatoes

and leaves

Trident

Sandoz

Tenebrionis

Tree leaves

Tfoil

Ecogen

Tenebrionis

M-One plus

Mycogen

Kurstaki

 

 

San Diego encapsulated toxin       

Table 1 Some commercial biopesticides based in Bacillus thuringiensis species20,24–26,28–30,32,35,37,38,46,51,81,82,85–93,96

Table 2 shows the biochemical and physiological differences of Bt compared to other typical microorganisms of the genus Bacillus. Unlike other species commonly found in soils, such as Bacillus cereus83 and Bacillus subtilis, Bt is unable to synthesize growth factors, explaining its incapability of growing in mineral agar, or in the absence of combined organic nitrogen.30,94,95 In addition to the normal tolerability of the spores of the Bacillus species to radiation, chemical agents, and thermal stability, the spores of the Bacillus stearothermophilus resist temperatures higher than 100 ºC, a genetic/biochemical property absent in the spores of Bt37,82,84,96 or applied for bioremediation soil polluted by petroleum products mixing Bt with Lysinbacillus sphaericus.97

Characteristics

Response of B. thuringiensis    

Response of representative Bacillus spp

Need of a growth factor

Positive

Negative

Induction to sporulation

No required

Stress required

Resistance of spores to UV

Negative

Positive

Growing in a mineral medium    

Negative

Positive

Genetic stability

Negative

Positive

Table 2 Biochemical and physiological differences of the Bacillus thuringiensis compared to other typical microorganisms of the genus Bacillus30,35,37,64,71,75,77,82–84,94–97,99,105,108,112–115–117

Table 3 presents selected features of some representative species of the Bacillus genus

The interactions between insects and bacteria are well documented.98 Natural and forced symbioses are often observed: mutualism in the case of Bacillus sp and bees35,48,67,80,88,99–103 parasitism is observed with Bacillus papillae, B.larvae, B.anthracis, B. sphaericus (now Lysinbacillus sphaericus), and B.cereus.35,46,66,104,105

Species

Reproduction

Bacillus spp

Only in symbiosis with bees

Bacillus papillae and B. larvae

Obligate parasite in insects only

Bacillus anthracis.

Facultative parasite in animals and humans

Bacillus sphaericus and Bt

Facultative parasite in mosquitos (Diptera)

Bacillus cereus

Saprobe in soils and rhizosphere

Paenibacillus polymixa (before Bacillus polymxya)        

Asymbiotic nitrogen bacteria in soils

Table 3 Selected reproduction features for representative species of the Bacillus genus 21,32,35,46,48,66,67,71,75–77,80,82,88,98–105,112–117

Table 4 presents a hypothetic response of Bt to the environment. It is assumed in this representation that the spores of Bt do not germinate under physicochemical stress conditions. Under this scenario, the Bt would only survive due to the interactions with insects27,35,38,106 and plants as endophyte.107 Furthermore, since the spores are unstable to the environment,32,71,72,75,77,94,108–111 continuous sporulation of Bt would be only possible under favorable conditions: good oxygenation, simple carbon–source provision, suitable pH and absence of life–threatening physicochemical agents.82,100,102

Condition

Response

Consequence

Not germinating spores

lost viability

Not survival

(due to nutritional requirements)

Crystal protein

Mineralization

Inactivation (hours)

(except when adhered to sand)

Vegetative sporulating forms     

No response to environmental stimulation     

Dormancy of vegetative cells (but not for sporulating)

Table 4 Hypothetic possible responses of Bacillus thuringiensis to abiotic and biotic natural environmental conditions27,32,35,38,65,68,71,72,75–77,82,94,100–102,106–112

Final comments

This short note shows that Bacillus thuringiensis behaves differently compared to other species of the Bacillus genus. Bt is considered as an entomotoxic and entomopathogenic bacteria, and its toxins are used to control insect pest, however, more research is needed to elucidate the effect of the remaining spores to continue the infection of other insects. It is also worth commenting that although Bt is genetically related to other species such as Bacillus cereus, B. subtilis, B. licheniformis and another Bacillus, their metabolism is strongly different. For instance, the B. cereus, B. subtilis, B. licheniformis species can grow in a medium with mineral nitrogen without B vitamins, or the Paenibacillus polymyxa species can even use atmospheric N2 as a source of nitrogen, Bt can only grow in presence of organic nitrogen compounds and B vitamins. This last requirement for growth on Bt makes the interaction with the insect even stronger, ending the insect’s offspring life from within as soon as Bt sporulation conditions are optimal. Finally, characterization of other toxins produced by Bt strains will further improved the application of these metabolites in other areas, however, the side effects resulted from the use of these toxins to the environment must necessarily be addressed.112–116

Acknowledgments

To project 2.7 of the CIC–UMSNH (2022), Morelia, Mexico, and to BIONUTRA, SA de CV, Maravatio, Mexico, for the support on this publication.

Author contributions: Conceptualization JMSY and GU.; data curation, JMSY, JL and GU; writing—original draft preparation, JMSY and GU.; writing—review and editing, JMSY and GU; Final version JMSY. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Ibrahim MA, Griko N, Junker M, et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis. A Genomic and proteomic persperctive. Bioeng Bugs. 2010;1:31–50.
  2. Palma L, Muñoz D, Berry C, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: An Overview of Their Biocidal Activity. Toxins. 2014;6, 3296–3325.
  3. Melo ALDA, Soccol VT, Soccol CR..  Bacillus thuringiensis:Mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: A review Crit Rev. Biotechnol.  2016;36, 317–326.
  4. Malovichko YV, Nizhnikov AA, Antonets KS. Repertoire of the Bacillus thuringiensis Virulence Factors Unrelated to Major Classes of Protein Toxins and Its Role in Specificity of Host–Pathogen Interactions. Toxins. 2019;11, 347.
  5. Erban T, Nesvorna M, Erbanova M, et al.Bacillus thuringiensis var tenebrionis control of synanthropic mites (Acari: Acaridida) under laboratory conditions. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009;49 (4):339–346.
  6. Abd El–Ghany A, Abd El–Ghany N.  Molluscicidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensisstrain against Biomphalariaalexandrina snails. Beni–SuefUniversityJournalofBasicand AppliedSciences. 2017;6:391–393.
  7. Du C, Cao S, Shi X, et al. Genetic and biochemical characterization of a gene operon for trans–aconitic acid, a novel nematicide from Bacillus thuringiensis. J Biol Chem. 2017;292, 3517–3530.
  8. Vazquez–Pineda. Use ofBacillus thuringiensis products as alternative method of control against important veterinary parasitic nematodes. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu. 2012;3 (1):77–88.
  9. Armada E, Azcón R, López– Castillo OM, et al. Autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus thuringiensis from a degraded Mediterranean area can be used to improve physiological traits and performance of a plant of agronomic interest under drought conditions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 90:64–74.
  10. De la Fuente SNM, Casados VLE, Barboza CJE. Bacteriocins of Bacillus thuringiensis can expand the potential of this bacterium to other areas rather than limit its use only as microbial insecticide. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2013;59:515–522.
  11. Fernandez–Chapa D, Ramirez–Villalobos J, Galan–Wong L. Toxic Potential of Bacillus thuringiensis: An Overview: in book: Protecting Rice Grains in the Post Genomic Era. 2019.
  12. Jian Z, Wang F, Li Z, et al. 2014. Grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency responses to N application in Bt (Cry1Ab/Ac) transgenic two–line hybrid rice. FieldCropsResearch. 155:184–191.
  13. Khorramnejad A, Talaei HR, Hosseininaveh V, et al. Characterization of new Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Iran, based on cytocidal and insecticidal activity, proteomic analysis and gene content. Biocontrol. 2018;63:807–818.
  14. Ohba M, Mizuki E, Uemori A. Parasporin, a new anticancer protein group from Bacillus thuringiensis. Anticancer Research. 2009;29:427–433.
  15. Periyasamy A, Kkani P, Chandrasekaran B, et al. Screening and characterization of a non–insecticidal Bacillusthuringiensis strain producing parasporal protein with selective toxicity against human colon cancer cell lines. Annalsof Microbiology. 2016;1:1–12.
  16. Aceves–Diez AE, Estrada–Castañeda KJ, Castañeda–Sandoval LM. Use of Bacillusthuringiensissupernatant from a fermentation process to improve bioremediation of chlorpyrifo in contaminated soils. JournalofEnviromentalManagement. 2015;157:213–219.
  17. Shikov AE, Malovichko YV, Lobov AA, et al. The Distribution of Several Genomic Virulence Determinants Does Not Corroborate the Established Serotyping Classification ofBacillus thuringiensis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22, 2244.
  18. Belousora ME, Malovicko YV, Shikov AE, et al. Dissecting the environmental consequences ofBacillus trhuringiensis application of natural ecosystems. Toxin. 2021;13:355.
  19. Li XQ, Tan A, Voegtline M, et al. Expression of Cry5B protein from Bacillus thuringiensis in plant roots confers resistance to root–knot nematode. Biol Control. 2008;47 (1):97–102.
  20. Vilas–Bôas GT, Peruca APS, Arantes OMN. Biology and taxonomy of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus anthracis, and Bacillus thuringien sis. Can. Microbiol.  2007;53, 673–687.
  21. Martínez–Zavala SA, Barboza–Pérez UE, Hernández–Guzmán G, et al. Chitinases of Bacillus thuringiensis:Phylogeny, Modular Structure, and Applied Potentials. Front Microbiol. 2020;10:3032.
  22. Bravo A, Likitvivatanavong S, Gill SS, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis: a story of successful bioinsecticide.  Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;41(7):423–431.
  23. Raymond B, Johnston PR, Nielsen–LeRoux C, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis:nAn impotent pathogen? Trends in Microbiology. 2010;18(5):89–194.
  24. Roh JY, Choi JY, Li MS, et  al. Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control. International Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology. 2017;17:547.
  25. Theoduloz C, Vega A, Salazar M, et al. Expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis δ–endotoxin cry1Ab gene in Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis strains that naturally colonize the phylloplane of tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.).  J Appl Microbiol. 94:1–7.
  26. Adang MJ, Crickmore N, Jurat– Fuentes JL. Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensiscrystal toxins and mechanism of action. Advancesin InsectPhysiology. 2014;47:39–87.
  27. Raymond B, Federici BA. In defence of Bacillus thuringiensis, the safest and most successful microbial insecticide available to humanity— a response to EFSA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93:fix084.
  28. Boyce R, Lenhart A, Kroeger A, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) for the control of dengue vectors: systematic literature review. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2013;18(5):564–577.
  29. Arturo RR, Ibarra JE. Plasmid patterns of Bacillus thuringiensis type strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:125–129.
  30. Brenner JD, Staley JT and Krieg NR. Bergey’s Manual Determinative Systematic      Bacteriology. In: Williaman W, Walkins W, editors. Baltimore. USA; 2006.
  31. Li Y, Shu C, Shan Y, et al. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis Bt185, a potential soil insect biocontrol agent. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2017;16(3):749–751.
  32. Broderick NA, Robinson CJ, McMahon MD, et al. Contribution of gut bacteria to Bacillus thuringiensis–induced mortality vary across a range of Lepidoptera. BMC Biol. 2009;7:11.
  33. Fang S, Wang L, Guo W, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis bel protein enhances the toxicity of Cry1Ac protein to Helicoverpa armigeralarvae by degrading insect intestinal mucin. Appl Environ Microbiol.  2009;75, 5237–5243.
  34. Jouzani GS, Valijanian E, Sharafi R. Bacillus thuringiensis:A successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings.  Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 101:2691–2711.
  35. Abdullah RR, Sukar NA, Ghanim NM. Improving the efficiency of Bacillus thuringiensis against insects of different feeding habits by plasmid transfer technique. Life Sci J. 2014;11:308–318.
  36. Abulreesh HH, Osman GEH, Assaeedi ASA. Characterization of insecticidal genes of Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from arid environments Indian. J Microbiol. 2012;52(3):500–503.
  37. Assaeedi ASA, Abulreesh HH, Osman GEH. The occurrence and insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis in the arid environments. Aust J Crop Sci. 2011;5(10);1185–1190.
  38. Valicente FH, Lana UGP. Molecular Characterization of the Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) Strains 344 and 1644, Efficient Against Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith). Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo. 2008;7(3):195–209.
  39. Zhang L, Zhao G, Hu X, et al.  Cry11Aa interacts with the ATP–binding protein from Culex quinquefasciatusto improve the toxicity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2017;65:10884–10890.
  40. Bizzarri MF, Bishop AH. The ecology of Bacillus thuringiensis on the Phylloplane: colonization from soil, plasmid transfer, and interaction with larvae of Pieris brassicae. Microb Ecol. 2008;56:133–139.
  41. Lacey LA, Frutos R, Kaya HK, et al. Insect pathogens as biological control agents:Back to the future. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2015;132:1–41.
  42. Osman GEH. Detection, cloning and bioinformatics analysis of vip1/vip2 genes from local Bacillus thuringiensis. Afri J Biotechnol. 2012;11(54):11678–11685.
  43. Osman GEH, Altaf WJ, Saleh IAS, et al. First report of detection of the putative receptor of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Vip3Aa from black cutworm (Agrotis ipsilon), Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2018;25:441–445.
  44. Sajid M, Geng C, Li M, et al. Whole–genome analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis revealing partial genes as a source of novel cry toxins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(14).
  45. Land M, Miljand M. Biological control of mosquitoes using Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis:A pilot study of effects on target organisms, non–target organisms and humans. Mistra Evi EM;PS4. 2014.
  46. Pardo–López L, Bravo A, Soberón M. Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three domain toxins mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:3–22.
  47. Wirth MC, Federici BA, Walton WE. Cyt1A from Bacillus thuringiensis synergizes activity of Bacillus sphaericus against Aedes aegypti (Diptera:Culicidae). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1093–1097.
  48. Milius S. “Bt–Corn Pollen Can Kill Monarchs”. Science News. 1999;155:324.
  49. Badran A, Guzov V, Huai Q, et al. Continuous evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins overcomes insect resistance. Nature. 2016;533:58–63.
  50. Peng D, Lin J, Huang Q, et al. novel metalloproteinase virulence factor is involved in Bacillus thuringiensis pathogenesis in nematodes and insects. Environ Microbiol.  2016;18, 846–862.
  51. Chougule NP  ,  Bonning BC. Toxins for transgenic resistance to hemipteran pests. Toxins. 2012;4:405–429.
  52. Panwar BS, Ram C, Narula RK, et al. Deconvolution approach for high–throughput gene mining from Bacillusthuringiensis. Applied MicrobiologyandBiotechnology.2018;102:1467–1482.
  53. Ye W, Zhu L, Liu Y, et al. Mining new crystal protein genes from Bacillusthuringiensis on the basis of mixed plasmid–enriched genome sequencing and a computational pipeline.AppliedMicrobiologyand Biotechnology. 2012;78:4795–4801.
  54. Carriere Y, Crowder YD, Tabashnik BE. Evolutionary ecology of insect adaptation to Bt crops. Evol Appl. 2010;3:561–573.
  55. Chen M, Shelton A, Ye GY. Insect– resistant genetically modified rice in China: From research to commercialization. Annual Review of Entomology. 2011;56:81–101.
  56. Jakka S, Shrestha R, Gassmann A. Broad–spectrum resistance to Bacillus thuringiensistoxins by western corn rootworm (Diabroticavirgifera virgifera). Scientific Reports. 2016;6:1.
  57. Li ZY, Sui H, Xu YB, et al. Effects of insect–resistant transgenicBt rice with a fused Cry1AbþCry1Ac gene on population dynamics of the stem borers, Chilo suppressalis and Sesamia inferens, occurring in paddyfield. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2012;32:1783–1789.
  58. Sanchis V , Bourguet D. Bacillus thuringiensis:Applications in agriculture and insect resistance management. Areview.AgronomyforSustainable Development. 2008;28:11–20.
  59. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie JD, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:775–806.
  60. Soberón M, López–Díaz JA, Bravo A. Bacillusthuringiensis:A protein fold conserved in several pathogenic microorganisms. Peptides. 2013;2;41:87–93.
  61. Tabashnik BE, Brévault T, Carrière Y. Insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis crops: lessons from the first billion acres. Nature Biotechnology. 2013;31(6):510–521.
  62. Valadares G, Whittome B, Shore B, et al. Identification of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki strain HD–1 like bacteria from environmental and human samples after aerial spraying of Victoria British Columbia, Canada, with foray 48B. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(3):1035–1043.
  63. Aronson AI, Beckman W, Dunn P. Bacillus thuringiensis and related insect pathogens. Microbial Rev. 1986;50(1):1–24.
  64. Sthaly DP, Dingman DW, Bulla Jr, et al. Possible origin and function of the parasporal crystal in Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978;84 (3):581–588.
  65. Burges HD, Hurst JA. Ecology of Bacillus thuringiensis in storage moths. J Invertebr Pathol. 1977;30(2):131–139.
  66. Alekseev AN, Karabanova LN, Shevtsov VV.Initiators and inhibitors of Bacillus thuringiensis spore germination. Mikrobiologiya. 1982;51:780–783.
  67. Chiang AS, Yen DF, Peng WK. Germination and proliferation of Bacillus thuringiensis, in the gut of rice month larva Corcyca cephalica. J Invertebr Pathol. 1986;48(1):96–99.
  68. Benoit TG, Wilson CR, Bull DL, et al. Plasmid associated sensitivity of Bacillus thuringiensis to UV light. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:2282–2286.
  69. Monnerat R, Soares CM, Capdeville G, et al. Translocation and insecticidal activity ofBacillus thuringiensis living inside of plants. Microbial Biotecnol. 2009;2 (4):512–520.
  70. Akiba Y. Microbial Ecology of Bacillus thuringiensis VI Germination of Bacillus thuringiensis spores in the soil. Appl Ent Zool. 1986;21 (1):76–80.
  71. Ferrerira LP, Suzuki TM, Hano NK, et al. Ecological aspects ofBacillus thuringiensis in on oxisol. Scientia Agricola. 2003;60 (1):19–22.
  72. Germanine GR, Murrell WG. Effect of dipicolinic acid on the ultraviolet radiation resistence of Bacillus cereus spores. Photochem Photobiol. 1973;17(3):145–154.
  73. Griego VM, Spence KD. Inactivation of Bacillus thuringiensis spores by ultraviolet and visible light. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978;35(5):906–910.
  74. Petras SF, Casida LE. Survival of Bacillus thuringiensis spores in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985;50 (6):1496–1501.
  75. Pruett CJH, Burges HD, Wyborn CH. Effects of exposure to soil on potency and spore viability of Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 1980;35(2):168–174.
  76. Sekijima Y, Akiba Y, Ono K, et al. Microbial ecological studies on Bacillus thuringiensis. I. Dynamics of Bacillus thuringiensis in soil of mulberry field. Japanese Journal of applied entomology and zoology. 1977;21(1):35–40.
  77. Ignoffo CM, García C. UV–Photorectivation of cell and spores of Bacillus thuringiensis effects of peroxidase of inactivation. Environ Entomol. 1978;7(2):270–272.
  78. Sanchez–Yañez JM, Peña–Cabriales JJ. Persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis spores on soil and maize and bean leaves. TERRA Latinoamericana. 2000;18 (4):325–331.
  79. Fonda MS, Salama HS, Selim M. Factors affecting the growth physiology of Bacillus thuringiensis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1985;22(1):50–52.
  80. Van Frankenhuyzen K. Cross–order, cross–phylum activity of   Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal proteins.Journalof Invertebrate Pathology. 2013;114:76–85.
  81. Ejiofor AO, Johnson T. Physiological and molecular detection of crystalliferous Bacillus thuringiensis strains and from habitats in South Central United States. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;28:284–290.
  82. Cherif A, Ettoumi B, Raddadi N, et al. Genomic diversity and relationship of Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus by multi–REP–PCR fingerprinting. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2007;53:343–350.
  83. Ferré J, Van Rie J. Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:501–533.
  84. Alper M, Güneş H, Tatlipinar A, e al. Distribution, occurrence of cry genes, and lepidopteran toxicity of native Bacillus thuringiensis isolated from fig tree environments in Aydın Province. Turkish J Agric For. 2014;38:898–907.
  85. Canton PE, Reyes EZ, de Escudero IR, et al. Binding of Bacillus thuringiensissubsp.israelensisCry4Ba to Cyt1Aa has an important role in synergism. Peptides. 2011;32:595–600.
  86. Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi RD, et al. Recent advances in downstream processing and formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis bases biopesticides. Process Biochem. 2006;41:323–342.
  87. Regis L, da Silva SB, Melo–Santos MAV. The use of bacterial larvicides in mosquito and black fly control programs in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000;95:207–210.
  88. Lee L, Saxena D, Stotzky G. Activity of free and clay–bound insecticide proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis sub, israelensis against the mosquito Culex pipiens. Appl Environ Microbial. 2003;69:4111–4115.
  89. Saxena D, Stotzky G. Fate and effects in soil of the insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis in transgenic plants, in:Collection of Biosafety Reviews. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste. 2003. p. 7–83.
  90. Saxena D, Pushalkar S, Stotzky G. Fate and effects in soil of Cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis influence of physicochemical and biological characteristics of soil. The Open Toxinology Journal. 2010;3:133–153.
  91. Stotzky G. Persistence and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and of bacterial DNA bound on clay and humic acids. J Environ Qual. 2000;29:691–705.
  92. Stotzky, G. Release, persistence, and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. In:DK. Letourneau, BE Burrows, editors. Genetically engineered organisms:assessing environmental and human health effects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA;2001. p. 187–222.
  93. Shishir A, Roy A, Islam N, et al. Abundance and diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in Bangladesh and their cry genes profile. Front Environ Sci. 2014;2:20.
  94. Valicente FH, Mourão AHC. Use of by–products rich in carbon and nitrogen as a nutrient source to produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner)–based biopesticide. Neotropical Entomology. 2008;37(6):702–708.
  95. Giustolin TA, Vendramin JD, Alves SB, et al. Susceptibility of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep., Gelechiidae) reared on two species of Lycopersicon to Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstarki. J Appl Entomol. 2001;125:551–556.
  96. Fiuza LM, Polanczyk RA, CrickmoreN.Bacillus thuringiensis andLysinibacillussphaericus:Characterization and Use in the Field of Biocontrol. Springer, Cham, Switzerland; 2017. ISBN:978–3–319–56678–8.
  97. Dale C, Moran NA. Molecular interactions between bacterial symbionts and their hosts. Cell.  2006;126:453–465.
  98. Agaisse H, Lerectus D. How does Bacillus thuringiensis produce so much insecticidal crystal protein? Journal of Bacteriology.1995;177 (21):6027–6032.
  99. Crickmore N, Zeigler DR, Feitelson J, et al. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(3):807–813.
  100. Höfte H, Whiteley R. Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev. 1989;53:242–255.
  101. Iriarte J, Porcar M, Lecadet MM, et al. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis strains from aquatic environments in Spain. Curr Microbiol. 2000;40(6):402–408.
  102. Li J, Carroll J, Ellar DJ. Crystal structures of insecticidal endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at 2.5 Å resolution. Nature. 1991;353:815–821.
  103. Da Silva RB, Valicente FH. Molecular characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis using rep–PCR. Springer Plus 2013;2:641.
  104. De Maagd R, Bravo A, Crickmore N. How Bacillus thuringiensis has evolved specific toxin to colonize the insect world. Rev Trend Genet. 2001;17:193–199.
  105. Armengol G, Escobar MC, Maldonado ME, et al. Diversity of Colombian strains of Bacillus thuringiensis with insecticidal activity against dipteran and lepidopteran insect. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:78–88.
  106. Minu MA, Dipak V. Bacillus thuringiensis as endophyte of medicine plants:auxin producing biopesticide. Int Res J Environment Sci. 2014;3 (9) 27–31.
  107. Bhalla R, Dalal M, Panguluri SK, et al. Isolation, characterization and expression of a novel vegetative insecticidal protein gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;243:467–472.
  108. Furlaneto L, Ostrensky SH, Nagy AOM. Survival and conjugal transfer between Bacillus thuringiensis strains in aquatic environment. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2000;31:233–238.
  109. Medrano–González MA, Luna–Olvera HA, Peña C J, et al. Survival of vegetative cells of Bacillus thuringiensis in the sphermosphere/rhizosphere of common bean. TERRA Latinoamericana. 2000;18 (4):333–337.
  110. West AW, Burges HD and Wyborn CH. Survival of Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus spore inocula in soil:effect of pH, moisture, nutrient availability and indigenous microorganisms. Soil Biochem. 1985;17:657–665.
  111. Aronson A, Shai Y. Why Bacillus thuringiensis toxins are so effective? unique features of their mode of action. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;195:1–8.
  112. Arrieta G, Hernández A, Espinosa AM. Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from coffee plantations infested with the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampey. Biol Trop. 2004;52(3):757–764.
  113. Blackburn MB, Martin PA, Kuhar D, et al. Phylogenetic distribution of phenotypic traits in Bacillus thuringiensis determined by multilocus sequence analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e6606.
  114. Martínez C, Caballero P. Contents of cry genes and insecticidal toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains from terrestrial and aquatic habitats. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92(4):745–752.
  115. Guo R, Ruan H, Yang W, et al. Differential responses of leaf water–use efficiency and photosynthetic nitrogen–use efficiency to fertilization in Bt–introduced and conventional rice lines. Photosynthetica. 2011;49:507–514.
  116. Cano, RJ, Boruck, MK, Schweitzer, MH, et al. Bacillus DNA in fossil bees: an ancient symbiosis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60(6):216.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2022 :, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.