Research Article Volume 8 Issue 1
1Department of Comprehensive Nursing, Wollo University, Ethiopia
2Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Wollo University, Ethiopia
Correspondence: Belachew Tegegne, Department of Comprehensive Nursing, School Of Nursing And Midwifery, College of Medicine And Health Sciences, Wollo University, Ethiopia, Tel +251 918315479
Received: February 27, 2023 | Published: March 13, 2023
Citation: Tegegne B, Goshiye D, Mengesha Z, et al. Determinants of hypertension crisis and stroke among hypertensive patients in South Wollo and Oromia special zones public hospitals. Int Phys Med Rehab J. 2023;8(1):70-78. DOI: 10.15406/ipmrj.2023.08.00337
Background: Uncontrolled hypertension results in hypertension crisis, and it is an important public health concern around the world. The incidence of complicating hospitalizations with hypertension continues to grow and is associated with increased mortality and adverse discharge. Hypertension crisis and stroke are caused by numerous factors; however, there is a paucity of studies to identify determinants of hypertension crisis and stroke in Ethiopia, particularly the study area.
Objective: To identify determinants of hypertension crisis and stroke among hypertensive patients in South Wollo zone and Oromia special zone public hospitals, 2022.
Methods: An institution based cross-sectional study was conducted among 416 participants in South Wollo and Oromia special zones public hospitals. Systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. Data were entered into Epidata version 3.1 and analyzed using Statistical package for social sciences version 23. Variables having P<0.25 in binary logistic regression was retained in the multivariable analysis to control the effect of confounding. Finally, determinants were identified based on adjusted odds ratio along with 95% confidence level at p-value less than 0.05. Model fitness was checked using Hosmer-Lemshow test.
Results: In this study, the magnitude of hypertensive crisis was 35.6%(95%CI:31.1,40.4). Age(41-60years)(AOR=0.76,95%CI:0.42,0.98), Social support(AOR=0.82,95%CI:0.41,0.93), living in urban(AOR=0.56,95%CI:0.24,0.86) and good medication adherence(AOR=0.48,95%CI:0.29,0.83) were determinants of hypertensive crisis. Another, the magnitude of stroke was 5.0%(95%CI:3.1,7.8). Rural residence (AOR=3.4,95%CI:1.23,9.44), Systolic blood pressure (AOR=9.6,95%CI:2.71,34.06), family history of stroke (AOR=0.26,95%CI:0.07,0.79) were determinants of stroke.
Conclusion and recommendation: The magnitude of hypertensive crisis was high, whereas the magnitude of stroke was relatively low. Age 41-60 years, urban residence, having social support and good medication adherence were determinants of hypertensive crisis, while rural residence, systolic blood pressure and family history of stroke were determinants of stroke. Thus, health care providers should screen aged patients and patients with family history of stoke.
Keywords: determinants, Ethiopia, hypertension crisis, stroke, blood pressure
HE, hypertension emergency; HU, hypertension urgency; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; COR, crude odds ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SPSS, statistical package for social sciences; WHO, world health organizations
Hypertension crisis is a sudden and severe increase in blood pressure. It is classified into two categories: hypertensive urgency and hypertension emergency. Hypertensive urgency is blood pressure reading ≥ 180/120mm Hg without target organ damage while Hypertensive emergency is Blood Pressure(BP)≥180/120mmHg with organ damage.1 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), stroke is defined as rapidly developing clinical signs of focal or global disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24hours or longer or leading to death which may be either ischemic or hemorrhagic disturbances of the cerebral blood circulation.2 The two major types of stroke are ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Ischemic stroke is the most common type that results in reduced blood supply to the brain tissues, whereas hemorrhagic stroke occurs due to the rupture of blood vessels within the brain.3
In developed countries, ischemic stroke is high whereas hemorrhagic stroke is high in sub-Saharan Africa countries, as such in Kenya (15%),4 Ethiopia (41%).5 The high prevalence of hypertension among Africans maybe attributed to decreased production and increased degradation of nitric oxide resulting in endothelial dysfunction.6 WHO points out that cardiovascular diseases account for approximately 17million deaths per year, and complications from hypertension accounts for 9.4 million of these deaths, hypertensive crisis is one of the major acute complications of hypertension, resulting in an emergency admission to hospitals.2,7
Africa is particularly worst hit, owing to population growth, unchecked industrialization and increased consumption of western diets, leading to a rise in many modifiable vascular disease risk factors including smoking, excessive use of alcohol, physical inactivity and unhealthy diets, and invariably resulting in increased prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and obesity.8,9 Even with this increasing burden, the public health response, accesses to health services and treatment options in many African countries have been poor. This facilitates the fatality rates of hypertension crisis.10
Currently in Ethiopia, stroke is one of the greatest public health problems, accounts for 7% of total deaths.11 As studies showed that stroke was the third most common cause of medical intensive care unit admissions (15.2%) and the first cause of death, which accounts for 17% of all deaths in the medical intensive care unit.12 Similarly, hypertension is responsible for 66.2% of all stroke admission and 38% of all strokes were on anti-hypertensive treatment.13
Uncontrolled hypertension results in a hypertension crisis and it is an important public health concern in the world. The incidence of complicating hospitalizations with hypertension continues to grow and is associated with increased mortality and adverse discharge. Hypertension crisis and stroke are caused by numerous factors. However, there is a paucity of studies to identify determinants of hypertension crisis and stroke in Ethiopia, particularly in the study area. Thus, this study was aimed at identifying determinants of hypertension crisis and stroke among hypertension patients in south Wollo and Oromia special zone public hospitals.
Study design and Study area description
The study was conducted in South Wollo and Oromia special zone public hospitals. There are 13 public hospitals in the South Wollo zone and 2 hospitals in the Oromia special zones. From a total of 15 public hospitals, 5 hospitals were selected randomly.
Study design and period
A five year retrospective institution-based cross-sectional study design was implemented from 21 January 2017 to 20 January 2022.
Study participants
The study populations were all hypertensive patients who had visited selected public hospitals found in South Wollo and Oromia special zones from January 20, 2017 to January 21, 2022.
Eligible criteria
Hypertensive patients aged equal or greater than 18years were included in the study, whereas patient charts with incomplete data were excluded from the study.
Sample size determination
The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula by considering the following assumptions: 95% CI (1.96), 5% margin of error, and estimated proportion of hypertension crisis (50%) due to lack of prior research.
Where, n=is sample size
z=the value of the standard normal curve score corresponding to the given confidence interval=1.96
p=estimated proportion of hypertension crisis (50%) as there is no previous study in Ethiopia as our knowledge.
d=the permissible margin of error (the required precision)=5%
After adding 10 % non-response rate, the final sample size was 422.
Sampling technique and procedure
Out of 15 hospitals found in South Wollo and Oromia special zones, 5 hospitals were selected by a simple random sampling technique (the lottery method). A proportional allocation of sample size was done for each selected hospital based on the number of patient flows. A systematically random sampling technique was used to select the records of the study subjects. The records of the study subjects were selected based on constant interval K, where K was calculated from total hypertension cases attended in public hospitals from January 21, 2017 to January 20, 2022 in chronological order divided by the sample size of the study (422). The first patient's medical record was selected by a lottery method and all patients’ charts in the K interval were included in the study until the calculated sample size was obtained.
Study variables
Magnitude of hypertension crisis
Magnitude of stoke
Operational definitions
Data collection tools and procedure
The data source for the study was hospital medical record review (history & summary of patient card). Data was collected by using a data collection format prepared to include all the necessary variables on the patient card. First, all hypertension patient cases were counted from the log book. Then, by using these card numbers, charts of the patients were retrieved from the card room. Five data collectors and five supervisors from each hospital were recruited.
Data quality assurance
Training was given for data collectors and supervisors for one day on the objective of the study and the contents of the questionnaire. Continuous supervision was held by supervisors and principal investigators, and communication by phone was done on a daily basis. Prior to actual data collection, the questionnaire was pretested on 5% at Woldia hospital. After reviewing the results of the pretest, modification of the questionnaire was performed for applicability of the questionnaire.
Data processing and analysis
The collected data was numerically coded, checked, cleaned, and entered into Epidata version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS version 23.0 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to see the associations between dependent and independent variables. Variables with a p-value ≤0.25 in bivariable analysis were candidates for multivariable analysis to control the possible effect of confounding. The AOR and 95% confidence intervals were used to determine the presence and strength of the association, and p< 0.05 was declared statistically significant. Model fitness was checked by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants
More than half (60.6%) of patients were females, 51.2% of patients were categorized as aged 40–60 years, and most (42.8%) of these patients could not read and write (Table 1).
Variables |
Variable category |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Sex |
Male |
164 |
39.4 |
Age(years) |
20-40 |
83 |
20.0 |
Marital status |
Single |
7 |
1.7 |
Educational status |
Unable to read and write |
178 |
42.8 |
Residence |
Urban |
271 |
65.1 |
Occupation |
Government employee |
29 |
7.0 |
Monthly income(ETB) |
<3000 |
113 |
44.7 |
Table 1 Socio demographic characteristics of participants to identify determinants of hypertension crisis and stroke among hypertensive patients (N=416).
ETB: Ethiopian birr, * students
Clinical and anthropometric measurements
Most (96.2%) of patients had normal cholesterol levels, but 78.1% of patients had uncontrolled blood glucose levels. More than one-third (37.3%) of patients had comorbidities, and peripheral neuropathy accounted for 36.7% of the total comorbidities (Table 2).
Items |
Category |
N (%) |
Duration of hypertension |
<5 years |
296(71.2) |
Cholesterol level |
<200mg/dl |
400(96.2) |
Blood glucose level(FBS) |
<126mg/dl |
91(21.9) |
Creatinine level |
<1mg/dl |
371(89.2) |
Urine albumin level |
<30mg/g |
398(95.7) |
BMI |
18.5-24.9 |
388(93.3) |
Systolic blood pressure |
<140mmHg |
274(65.9) |
Diastolic blood pressure |
<90mmHg |
291(70.0) |
Presence of comorbidities |
Yes |
155(37.3) |
If yes, type of comorbidities |
Diabetes Mellitus |
43(27.2) |
Presence of family history of stroke |
Yes |
36(8.7) |
Drugs given for the treatment of hypertension |
ACEIs |
177(42.5) |
Do you ever taken lipid regulating drugs |
Atorvastatin |
79(19.1) |
Attending hypertension education |
Yes regularly |
86(20.8) |
Having social support |
Yes |
399(95.9) |
Table 2 Clinical and anthropometric measurements of patients to identify determinants of hypertensive crisis and stroke in South Wollo zone and Oromia special zone public hospitals
* Eye disorders, ACEI: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, CCB: Calcium channel blockers
Anti-hypertension medication adherence
The mean (±SD) of antihypertensive adherence was 12.76(±1.83). This mean was used to classify participants into two categories. Thus, 228(54.8%, 95%CI: 50.0-58.9) patients had good adherence and 188(45.2%, 95%CI: 41.1-50.0) had poor adherence (Table 3).
MMAS Adherence questions |
Responses |
|
Yes, n(%) |
No, n(%) |
|
Do you sometimes forget to take your prescribed medications? |
208(50) |
208(50) |
Over the past two weeks, were there any days you did not take any prescribed medications? |
87(20.9) |
329(79.1) |
Have you stopped taking medications because you feel worse when you when took it? |
155(37.3) |
261(62.7) |
When you travel or leave home, do you sometimes forget to bring along your medications? |
223(53.6) |
193(46.4) |
Did you take your medication yesterday? |
354(85.1) |
62(14.9) |
When you feel like your health is under control, do you sometimes stop to take medications? |
91(21.9) |
325(78.1) |
Do you feel hassled about sticking to your prescribing treatment plan? |
106(25.5) |
310(74.5) |
How often do you have difficulty, to take your medications? |
122(29.3) |
294(70.7) |
Table 3 Anti-hypertension medication adherence among hypertensive patients
Adherence to dietary modifications
Dietary modification for hypertension patients is crucial to control different complications. In this study, more than three-fourths (78.4%) of patients rarely ate fruits and vegetables (Table 4).
Items |
Never n(%) |
Rarely n(%) |
Usually n(%) |
Always n(%) |
Do you include fruits, vegetable, grains, and beans in your diet after you diagnosis with hypertension? |
33(7.9) |
326(78.4) |
53(12.7) |
4(1%) |
How often do you consume foods that contain high saturated fat (e.g., cheese, coconut oil, cottonseed oil, mutton fat etc.) since being diagnosed? |
126(30.3) |
274(65.9) |
16(3.8) |
0 |
Do you consume spicy foods since being diagnosed |
113(27.2) |
270(64.9) |
33(7.9) |
0 |
Do you consume salt in your food? |
206(49.5) |
191(45.9) |
4(1.0) |
15(3.6) |
Do you read nutritional facts on food labels to compare the amount of sodium in products |
328(78.8) |
65(15.6) |
15(3.6) |
8(1.9) |
Table 4 Dietary modifications among hypertension patients
Adherence to exercise
As non-pharmacological management, exercise is recommended for hypertension patient. In this finding, one –fourths (25.2%) patients perform exercise. (Table 5)
Items |
Variable categories |
n(%) |
Do you perform physical exercise at all? |
Yes |
105(25.2) |
How often do you exercise? |
< Three times per week |
34(8.2) |
What type of exercise do you perform?
|
Walking |
95(22.8) |
For how long do you exercise per session? |
< 30 minutes |
33(7.9) |
Table 5 Adherence to exercise among hypertension patients
Cessation of smoking
Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for hypertension patients. For hypertension patients, stopping cigarette smoking is recommended. As shown from the table, 11.8% of patients were smokers. (Table 6)
Items |
Category |
N(%) |
Have you ever used tobacco? |
Yes |
49(11.8) |
Do you still smoke cigarettes? |
Yes |
6(1.4) |
Have you tried to quit smoking? |
Yes |
21(5.0) |
Table 6 Cessation of smoking among hypertension patients
Alcohol consumption
Moderate alcohol consumption is good for hypertension patients to control further complications. In the current study, majority (92.1%) of hypertension patients had never drank alcohol. (Table 7)
s.n |
Items |
Coding |
n(%) |
1 |
How often do you have a drink containing alcohol? |
(0) Never |
383(92.1) |
2 |
How many drinks containing alcohol do you have on a typical day when you are drinking? |
(0) 1 or 2 |
30(7.2) |
3 |
How often do you have six or more drinks on one occasion? |
(0) Never |
27(6.5) |
4 |
How often during the last year have you found that you were not able to stop drinking once you had started? |
(0) Never |
3(0.7) |
5 |
How often during the last year have you failed to do what was normally expected from you because of drinking? |
(0) Never |
24(5.8) |
6 |
How often during the last year have you needed a first drink in the morning to get yourself going after a heavy drinking session? |
(0) Never |
33(7.9) |
7 |
How often during the last year have you had a feeling of guilt or remorse after drinking? |
(0) Never |
6(1.4) |
8 |
How often during the last year have you been unable to remember what happened the night before because you had been drinking? |
(0) Never |
27(6.5) |
9 |
Have you or someone else been injured as a result of your drinking? |
(0) No |
18(4.3) |
10 |
Has a relative or friend or a doctor or another health worker been concerned about your drinking or suggested you cut down? |
(0) No |
3(0.7) |
Table 7 Alcohol consumption among hypertension patients
Magnitude of hypertension crisis
In this study, 34.1% of patients had greater than 140 mmHg (uncontrolled hypertension) and 30% of patients had greater than 90 mmHg. The magnitude of the hypertensive crisis was 35.6 %( 95% CI: 31.1, 40.4).
Determinants of hypertensive crisis
From bivariable analysis, age, marital status, occupation, blood glucose level, type of comorbidity, type of antihypertensive drugs, attending hypertensive education, having social support, and good adherence were significantly associated with hypertensive crisis. From multivariable analysis; age (41-60years), residence, having social support, and good adherence were determinants of hypertensive crisis.
Accordingly, participants aged 41–60years were 24% less likely to develop hypertensive crises as compared to participants aged >60 years (AOR=0.76, 95%CI: 0.42, 0.98). Those participants living in urban areas were 44% less likely to develop hypertensive crises as compared to rural residents (AOR=0.56, 95%CI: 0.24, 0.86). Participants who received social support were 18% less likely than their counterparts to develop hypertensive crises (AOR= 0.82, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.93). Lastly, participants who had good adherence were 52% less likely to develop hypertensive crisis as compared to their counterparts (AOR=0.48, 95%CI: 0.29, 0.83) (Table 8).
Variables |
Variables categories |
Hypertensive crisis |
COR(95%CI) |
AOR(95%CI) |
|
Yes |
No |
||||
Sex |
Male |
18 |
46 |
0.72(0.55,1.25) |
|
Age(years) |
20-40 |
30 |
53 |
1.3(0.7,2.3) |
1.1(0.87,2.36) |
Marital status |
Single |
1 |
2 |
1.2(0.18,7.88) |
|
Educational status |
Unable to read and write |
34 |
65 |
0.8(0.34,1.86) |
|
Residence |
Urban |
30 |
60 |
0.98(0.64,1.50)* |
0.56(0.24,0.86)** |
Occupation |
Government employee |
13 |
16 |
1 |
|
Monthly income(birr) |
<3000 |
41 |
72 |
1 |
|
Duration of hypertension |
<5 years |
36 |
82 |
1 |
|
Blood glucose level |
<120mg/dl |
5 |
14 |
1 |
|
Creatinine level |
<1mg/dl |
41 |
88 |
1 |
|
Urine albumin level |
<30mg/g |
46 |
100 |
1 |
|
BMI |
18.5-24.9 |
49 |
105 |
0.53(0.19,1.44) |
|
Systolic BP |
<160mmHg |
26 |
54 |
1 |
|
Diastolic BP |
<110mmHg |
34 |
73 |
1 |
|
Presence of comorbidities |
Yes |
1 |
2 |
0.8(0.53,1.22) |
|
Type of comorbidities |
diabetes mellitus |
17 |
26 |
1 |
|
Family history of stroke |
Yes |
5 |
7 |
1.55(0.59,2.39) |
|
Drugs given for treatment of hypertension |
ACEIs |
20 |
38 |
1 |
|
Do you ever taken lipid regulating drugs |
Atorvastatin |
6 |
13 |
1 |
|
Attending hypertension education |
Yes, regularly |
19 |
29 |
1.6(0.6,4.4) |
|
Having social support |
Yes |
143 |
256 |
1.34(0.26,1.35)* |
0.82(0.41,0.93)** |
Antihypertensive drug adherence |
Good |
77 |
151 |
0.84(0.61,0.98)* |
0.48(0.29,0.83)** |
Table 8 Determinants of hypertensive crisis among hypertensive patients in south Wollo zone and oromia special zone public hospitals
*p<0.25, **p<0.05, 1-reference category
Magnitude of stroke
Out of 416 patients, 21 patients had stroke. Thus, the magnitude of stroke was 5.0% ( 95%CI: 3.1-7.8).
Determinants of stroke
From bivariable analysis, sex, age, residence, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, and family history of stroke were significantly associated with the magnitude of stroke. From multivariable analysis, residence, SBP, and having a family history of stroke were determinants of stroke.
Accordingly, rural participants were 3.4 times more likely to develop a stroke as compared to urban residents (AOR=3.4, 95%CI: 1.23, 9.44). Participants with uncontrolled systolic blood pressure were 9.6 times more likely to develop stroke as compared to control SBP (AOR=9.6, 95%CI: 2.71, 34.06). Participants without a family history of stroke were 74% less likely to develop a stroke as compared to their counterparts (AOR=0.26, 0.07, 0.79).(Table 9)
Variables |
Variables categories |
Stroke |
COR(95%CI) |
AOR(95%CI) |
|
Yes |
No |
||||
Sex |
Male |
12 |
152 |
1 |
|
Age(years) |
20-40 |
3 |
80 |
2.16(0.57,8.24) |
|
Residence |
Urban |
6 |
265 |
1 |
1 |
Blood glucose level |
<120mg/dl |
3 |
88 |
1.72(0.49,5.97) |
|
Creatinine level |
<1mg/dl |
18 |
353 |
1.4(0.4,4.96) |
|
Systolic BP |
<160mmHg |
3 |
271 |
1 |
1 |
Diastolic BP |
<110mmHg |
9 |
282 |
3.3(1.37,8.1)* |
|
Presence of comorbidities |
Yes |
6 |
149 |
1.5(0.58,4.04) |
|
Family history of stroke |
Yes |
6 |
30 |
1 |
1 |
Hypertensive drug Adherence |
Good |
12 |
216 |
1.11(0.46,2.68) |
|
Table 9 Determinants of stroke among hypertensive patients in south Wollo and oromia special zone public hospitals
*p<0.25, **p<0.05, *** p<0.001, 1- reference category
Ethiopian morbidity and mortality rates rise from time to time as a result of hypertension crises. In this study, the magnitude of hypertensive crisis was 35.6%( 95% CI: 31.1, 40.4). This finding is higher than a study conducted in Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital and Debre Markos, Ethiopia.17,18 However, this finding is lower than a study conducted in Karachi, Pakista(56.3%)19 and Gondar(59.2%),Ethiopia.20
Being old was a risk factor for a hypertension crisis. Accordingly, participants aged 41–60years were 24% less likely to develop hypertensive crises as compared to participants aged >60years (AOR=0.76, 95%CI: 0.42, 0.98). This is supported by studies in Shashemene, Ethiopia21 and Luanda, Angola.22
The living environment was a factor in hypertensive crisis. Those participants living in urban areas were 44% less likely to develop hypertensive crises as compared to rural residents (AOR= 0.56, 95%CI: 0.24, 0.86). This finding is supported by other studies; Kenya,4 Bahirdar, Ethiopia,5 and Nigeria.23
Another found that having social support was significantly associated with a hypertension crisis. Participants who received social support were 18% less likely to develop hypertensive crisis than their counterparts(AOR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.41, 0.93).This is congruent with different studies.8,24
The determinant of the hypertension crisis was drug adherence. Participants who had good adherence were 52% less likely to develop hypertensive crises as compared to their counterparts. This finding was supported by other studies: Nigeria,25 Ethiopia17 and India.15
In the present study, the magnitude of stroke was 5.0%( 95: CI: 3.1-7.8). This is in line with a study conducted in Debre Markos,7.7%3 and JUMC,26 Felege Hiwot hospital,27 Ethiopia. However, this finding is lower studies conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,28 India,15 and Nigeria.29
Concerning determinants of stroke, rural residence, uncontrolled systolic blood pressure, and having a family history of stroke were determinants of stroke. Accordingly, rural participants were 3.4 times more likely to develop a stroke as compared to urban residents (AOR= 3.4, 95%CI: 1.23, 9.44). This result is congruent with studies conducted in different settings: Debre Markos,3 Ethiopia, USA,30 and Kenya.4
Participants with uncontrolled systolic blood pressure were 9.6 times more likely to develop stroke as compared to controlled systolic blood pressure (AOR=9.6, 95%CI: 2.71, 34.06). This is supported by previous studies.6,29,31
Having family history of stroke was significantly associated with stroke. Participants without family history of stroke were 74% less likely to develop stroke as compared to their counter parts (AOR=0.26, 0.07, 0.79). This is similar with previous studies.5,24,27,32,33
The magnitude of the hypertensive crisis was high, whereas the magnitude of the stroke was relatively low. Age (41–60years), urban residence, having social support and good medication adherence were determinants of hypertensive crisis, while rural residence, uncontrolled systolic blood pressure and family history of stroke were determinants of stroke. Thus, healthcare providers should screen aged patients and patients with a family history of stroke, and the minister of health should prepare guidelines on how to manage hypertensive patients and increase imaging facilities for early screening of stroke.
First and foremost, we would like say thank you Wollo University for financial support. Next to this, we would like to give special thanks and appreciation for study participants and data collectors.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
None.
Not applicable. No individual personal details, images or videos are being used in this study
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
An ethical letter was obtained from the institutional review board (IRB) of Wollo University, and a letter of permission was obtained from the chief executive officers of the study hospitals. To ensure confidentiality, data were collected anonymously, and all data collection was done in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
©2023 Tegegne, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.