Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2574-9838

International Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Journal

Short Communication Volume 6 Issue 3

Application of the practical-clinical guide according to the APTA model in degenerative knee joint disorders. Experience at the Luis Vernaza hospital

Cruz Diego, Campos Leonardo, Flor Laura, Karla Medina

Physical therapist, Guayaquil, Ecuador

Correspondence: Cruz Diego, Physical therapist, Guayaquil– Ecuador, Tel +593 986985647

Received: November 11, 2021 | Published: November 25, 2021

Citation: Diego C, Leonardo C, Laura F, et al. Application of the practical-clinical guide according to the APTA model in degenerative knee joint disorders. Experience at the Luis Vernaza hospital. Int Phys Med Rehab J. 2021;6(3):83-84. DOI: 10.15406/ipmrj.2021.06.00288

Download PDF

Abbreviations

CG, control group; EG, experimental group

Introduction

The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) approaches the evaluation and treatment of the patient from the biopsychosocial model, which is why it considers it of utmost importance not only to recover the person from the physical point of view; but also mental and social, using its own evaluative method according to the fundamental systems of the human body, such as: musculoskeletal, neuro-muscular, cardiovascular, respiratory and integumentary.

In 2018, Ecuador is still far from this type of physiotherapeutic approach, since if a person comes for any type of musculoskeletal pathology, this will be the only system addressed by the physical therapist. Thus, separating the rest of the fundamental systems, which will also have an impact due to their kinesiopathological association.

Objective

To compare the benefits of applying the clinical-practice guide according to the APTA model in relation to conventional physical therapy treatment based on patient satisfaction according to the EQ-3D scale for a proposed physiotherapeutic intervention. 

Hypothesis

Physiotherapeutic treatment according to the APTA model and its approach according to the fundamental systems and kinesiopathological relationship present greater satisfaction in patients than a conventional therapeutic treatment.

Methods

The study carried out had an experimental research level, carried out at the Luis Vernaza Hospital in the city of Guayaquil (Ecuador) from March to September 2018 in patients who presented a medical diagnosis according to ICD 10 of internal knee disorder (M23), based on radiological studies.

Within a population universe of 286 people and through the inclusion criteria of patients with internal knee disorders, plus the exclusion criteria of non-neurological patients, non-trauma patients, among others; Seventy-three adults with an age range of 18-90 years were used as a sample (39 women and 34 men) who were randomly divided into two groups: control group (CG) with 49 patients and experimental group (EG) with 24. In one of them (EG) the patient was approached according to the model proposed by the APTA, while the other group (CG) underwent conventional physiotherapeutic treatment.

The follow-up was for 12 sessions carried out 3 times a week and their satisfaction with the EuroQol 3D health questionnaire was evaluated, both at the beginning and at the end of the treatment.

Results

Both groups show improvements according to their treatment, however, 75.52% (37 patients) of the control group could not be measured correctly, therefore the real improvement of the patient decreases to an average of 3.64% (12 patients) for the remaining part that, if it was evaluated correctly, according to the EuroQol 3D health questionnaire. In contrast, the experimental group presented a patient improvement of 20.07% (24 patients).

In addition, it was found that the fundamental systems that are mostly related to each other are the musculoskeletal system, specifically the internal rotators (78.57%), external (70.83%) and gluteus medius (60.71%); and the neuro-muscular system in its L2 dermatome showed a 33% pathological decrease in sensitivity (hypoesthesia). The cardio-vascular, respiratory and integumentary systems did not show significant changes.1–28

Conclusion

Patients with degenerative knee disorders report greater satisfaction with treatment based on the evaluation of fundamental systems according to the APTA model, which is why they present an improvement in all aspects evaluated, being emphatic in the result regarding pain and mobility.

This is due to the fact that there is a kinesiopathological relationship between the musculoskeletal system and the neuro-muscular system, resulting in that the muscles most affected in such pathologies are the rotators (internal and external), mainly the gluteus medius, since it maintains these functions both in static and in dynamic, apart from being a hip abductor and being in the dermatome (L2) more affected.

Based on the statistics obtained, there is an approximate 5: 1 ratio between the treatment of the control group versus the experimental group; that is to say that for each patient that recovers satisfactorily with a traditional treatment, five patients approached according to the model proposed by the APTA.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The author states there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Alej L, Heredia J.The patient/client physiotherapeutic care guide described by the APTA in the training of physiotherapists Ibero-Americans. 2012.
  2. APTA. Guide to physical therapist practice. Pennsylvania: Elsevier; 2010.
  3. APTA. Evidence-Based Practice & Research.
  4. Arellano P, Ortega, M. Comparative study between magnetic resonance imaging with conventional sequences and volumetric spin-echo sequence in the diagnosis of meniscal fractures of traumatic origin. 2015.
  5. Cid-Ruzafa J, al E. Barthel Indie. Madrid: Spanish Journal of Public Health.Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Constitution of the Republic of the Ecuador. 2007.
  6. Daza J. Clinical-functional evaluation of human body movement. Bogota: Pan American; 2013.
  7. Fermín S. Practical neurological examination: its clinical interpretation. HolySunday: OWL; 2002.
  8. Fernández K. Ligaments and tendons of the ankle: Anatomy and most frequent conditions analyzed by magnetic resonance imaging. Anales de Radiología México. 2013;82–84.
  9. Giraldo C, Sánchez A, & Figueroa Y. Theoretical foundation of the APTA. 2015.
  10. Goldstein M, Elliott S, Guccione A. The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000.
  11. González F, Panchón A, Lamprea A., et al. Implementation of clinical record based on the parameters proposed by the APTA (Unpublished Master's Thesis).Manizales: UAM; 2014.
  12. Hernández J, Monllau J. Ligamentous knee injuries. Barcelona: Marge Medica Books; 2012.
  13. Hernández R, Fernández C, Baptista P. Investigation methodology. Mexico DF: Mc Graw Hill; (2014).
  14. Herrera A, Ferrández L, Herrero-Beaumont G, The hip. Barcelona: Masson; 2001.
  15. Hickok, R. Physical therapy administration and management. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 2010.
  16. ICF. Creating an interface between the international classification of functioning, disability and health and physical therapist practice. 2010.
  17. INEC. Studies and investigations. 2013.
  18. Lavanchy. J. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Valladolid: Graphs; 2011.
  19. Organic Health Law. Regulation to the organic health law. 2021.
  20. Medspine. Dermatomes and myotomes.
  21. Netter F. Atlas of human anatomy. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2011.
  22. APA rules. APA standards 6th edn. 2017.
  23. National plan for good living. 2009-2013.
  24. Saul T. Management of spinal cord injury, Bulletin American College of Surgeons.Chicago: GivingBack; 1995.
  25. Sohier R, Company M. Analytical physiotherapy of the hip joint. Madrid: Panamericana; 2009.
  26. Sous J, Navarro R, Navarro R, et al. Classification of ankle fractures. 2011.  
  27. Testut L. Descriptive anatomy compendium. Barcelona: Salvat; 2009.
  28. Viladot Ay. Basic biomechanical lessons of the appliance locomotor. 2009.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2021 Diego, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.