Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2574-9838

International Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Journal

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 1

Aerobic capacity as an indicator of health

Cesar Nhamitambo

Departamento de Treino, César Nhamitambo, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane (UEM) Escola Superior de Ciências do Desporto (ESCIDE), Mozambique

Correspondence: Cesar Nhamitambo, Departamento de Treino, César Nhamitambo, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane (UEM) Escola Superior de Ciências do Desporto (ESCIDE), Mozambique, Tel +258828138210

Received: December 08, 2023 | Published: February 28, 2024

Citation: Nhamitambo C. Aerobic capacity as an indicator of health. Int Phys Med Rehab J. 2024;9(1):34-37. DOI: 10.15406/ipmrj.2024.09.00370

Download PDF

Abstract

The exercise was carried out to evaluate and classify the level of physical fitness as an indicator of health, to measure the aerobic capacity, which in turn indicates the level of physical fitness. To achieve the objective, The most well-known test in the history of physical education is the Cooper running test, which is a maximum and field test, suitable for all age groups, teenagers, women and men, consists of running for 12 minutes, which refers to enduranceaerobics, which is the ability to tolerate fatigue caused by exercise, managing to maintain the pace and intensity for a long time without a considerable drop in physical performance. The sample consisted of 44 2nd year students, in the 1st academic semester of 2022 at the Escola Superior de Ciências do Desporto (ESCIDE) of the Eduardo Mondlane University (UEM). The main measure for assessing aerobic capacity is maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max=distance-504.1/44.9), which indicates the maximum and integrated capacity of the organism to extract, transport and use oxygen molecules as an energy substrate. The evaluation was carried out on an athletics track with a 400 meter loop. Once the Cooper test was completed, the individual results obtained in the evaluation were compared and using the average health indicator Table 1 of maximum VO2 for running, Table 2 women and Table 3 men, whose classification range is between very poor, poor, sufficient, good, excellent and higher education, resulted in an assessment of the students' physical fitness level as 1 poor, 6 sufficient, 11 good, 12 excellent and 14 superior.

Keywords: assessment, aerobic capacity, cooper test, VO2max

Introduction

Resistance is the ability to tolerate or endure something. A person's ability to perform a low or medium intensity effort over a prolonged period of time. This capacity depends on oxygen management, that is, on the balance that the subject manages to achieve between the need for oxygen for activities and the actual consumption. A person with good aerobic endurance can tolerate the fatigue caused by exercise, managing to maintain the pace and intensity for a considerable time. Through aerobic exercise, a process occurs that increases cardiac efficiency and this, in turn, improves oxygen transport and the capacity of skeletal muscles, reducing blood pressure and heart rate and, finally, causing the absorption of oxygen. oxygen has an increase in its capacity. Aerobic capacity can be defined as the maximum capacity to absorb, use and transport oxygen during physical exercise, as the longer the exercise or physical activity, the greater the need for oxygen to provide the body with greater aerobic resistance.1

For Medeiros, (2010) cardiorespiratory fitness or aerobic resistance refers to the efficiency of the lungs, arteries, capillaries and heart, acting uninterruptedly in transporting sufficient oxygen and nutrients towards the muscles involved in the activity. Factors that influence aerobic capacity, such as genetics and heredity, have a direct relationship with the individual's aerobic potential, but the habit of regularly practicing physical exercise can reduce the incidence of these factors, being in guided practice the most effective intervention method. aerobic exercise is common. According to Kenneth Cooper2 aerobic training improves the capacity of the central circulation and consequently the supply of oxygen, it also improves the use of oxygen by active muscles, reduces the appearance of cardiovascular diseases, strengthens the immune system and is efficient in the weight loss process, maintaining and increasing general physical fitness, physiological adaptations make the individual more able to perform physical activities and combatstress routine, consequently improving quality of life. Throughout the day, a person generally depends on the aerobic system for 98%.OMuscles and the cardiovascular system can adapt to increase their ability to use oxygen. Maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) is widely used as the best measure of individual cardiorespiratory fitness, and consequently the best measure of physical fitness. VO2max is defined as the maximum volume of oxygen per unit of time (ml/min/kg) that an individual uses at maximum effort. Anyone can increase maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max), but baseline levels vary according to age, sex, health, weight and physical activity (Lia Kubelka Back,Florianópolis). Throughout the literature review, it became clear that cardiovascular training requires at least 30 minutes of exercise per session, 3 times a week, for approximately 8 to 12 weeks to ensure an increase in aerobic capacity. According to  Kenneth H Cooper2 resistance is the best life insurance.

Methodology

The study is quantitative in nature, descriptive, comparative and exploratory. It is based on the Cooper Test as it is a field test that is easy to administer to a large number of people simultaneously, it is suitable for all age groups, for women and men, it consists of covering the greatest distance running over 12 timed minutes, after the time has elapsed. The distance covered in meters is counted and the Cooper test protocol is used to measure VO2 max. which corresponds to the formula VO2max=Distance-504.1/44.9, these last two variants being fixed. This protocol is designed to estimate maximum oxygen consumption, which corresponds to milliliters of oxygen consumed per kilogram of body weight (ml/min/kg), the main indicator of health and/or performance. To calculate running speed, the formula was useddistance/12 min= meters/minute.

Procedure

44 students participated in the assessment, of which 8 women and 36 men aged between 19 and 39 years old. There were no exclusion criteria as participation in the assessment is mandatory except in the case of illness or injury. In accordance with the objective of measuring the level of physical fitness of students in the 2nd Year 2022 class at ESCIDE-UEM in classes related to the Discipline Sports Practices II (Athletics) of the Degree in Sports Sciences. For evaluation, a previous record of age and weight was recorded, the Cooper Running Test and its protocol were used, on a 400 meter track and the results illustrated in Table 1 were obtained, all members of the class see columns referring to age, weight and race Cooper test, taking as a reference average indicator of VO2 Max for the race, Table 2, 3 the VO2 Max results were obtained, the average speed of the race was calculated using the formula Distance/12 min= Speed ​​and finally a comparison was made between the student who covered the same distance but have different weight, represented in Table 4–6. The illustrated evaluation results arestarting age, weight, distance in meters, estimated VO2max, average speed and the corresponding evaluation of each sample unit.

No.

Age/sex

Weight (kg)

Cooper run/distance/meter test

VO2max

Average speed: m/s

Assessment

1

23/M

 

2250

52.2

212.5

Higher

two

22/M

58

2900

53.3

241.6

Higher

3

20/M

64.5

2970

54.9

247.5

Higher

4

26/M

56

3500

63.3

291.6

Higher

5

23/M

68.2

2350

41.1

195.8

Enough

6

21/M

64

2500

44.4

208.3

Good

7

22/M

68

2450

42.6

204.1

Good

8

23/M

 

2200

37.7

183.3

Enough

9

23/M

 

2450

42.6

204.1

Enough

10

34/M

102

2500

44.4

208.3

Good

11

21/M

66

2750

50

229.1

Great

12

22/M

65

2800

52

236.6

Great

13

22/M

68

2500

44.4

208.3

Good

14

21/M

 

2750

50

229.1

Great

15

21/M

 

2450

42.6

204.1

Good

16

22/M

60

2800

51.1

233.3

Great

17

20/M

62

3250

61.1

270.8

Higher

18

23/M

64

2500

44.4

208.3

Good

19

22/M

 

3200

60

266.6

Higher

20

33/M

85

2400

42.2

200

Good

21

21/M

70

2900

53.3

241.6

Higher

22

23/M

 

2350

41.1

195.8

Enough

23

21/M

51

2750

50

229.1

Great

24

22/M

69

2420

42.6

201.6

Good

25

19/M

54

2850

52.2

237.5

Great

26

25/M

 

3170

59.3

264.1

Higher

27

24/M

67

3100

57.8

258.3

Higher

28

39/M

 

2420

42.2

201.6

Good

29

27/M

78

2920

53.8

243.3

Higher

30

24/M

 

3150

58.9

262.5

Higher

31

20/M

59

2700

48.9

225

Good

32

22/M

58

2900

53.3

241.6

Higher

33

22/M

 

2100

35.5

175

Poor

34

35/M

68

3050

56.7

254.1

Higher

35

24/M

64

2800

51.1

233.3

Great

36

19/M

63

2500

44.4

208.3

Enough

37

20/F

20

2250

38.8

187.5

Great

38

21/F

 

2100

35.5

175

Good

39

26/F

 

1900

31

158.3

Good

40

20/F

60

2200

37.7

183.3

Great

41

24/F

 

2200

37.7

183.3

Great

42

20/F

63

2300

39.9

191.6

Great

43

20/F

48

2650

47.7

220.8

Higher

44

22/F

 

1850

29.9

154.1

Enough

Table 1 Research results obtained after the procedure

Age

Very poor

Poor

Normal

Good

Great

Higher

13 to 19

Minus 25

25 to 31

31 to 35

35 to 39

39 to 42

Over 42

20 to 29

Minus 23

23 to 29

29 to 33

33 to 37

37 to 41

Over 41

30 to 39

Minus 23

23 to 27

27 to 31

31 to 35

35 to 40

Over 40

40 to 49

Under 21

21 to 24

24 to 29

29 to 33

33 to 37

Over 37

50 to 59

Minus 20

20 to 23

23 to 27

27 to 31

31 to 36

Over 36

60 and over

Under 17

17 to 20

20 to 24

24 to 30

30 to 31

Over 31

Table 2 Cooper running test protocol regarding physical fitness for women

Age years

Very poor

Poor

Normal

Good

Great

Higher

13 to 19

Minus 35

35 to 38

38 to 45

45 to 51

51 to 56

Over 56

20 to 29

Minus 33

33 to 36

36 to 42

42 to 46

46 to 52

Over 52

30 to 39

Minus 31

31 to 35

35 to 41

41 to 45

45 to 49

Over 49

40 to 49

Minus 30

30 to 33

33 to 39

39 to 43

43 to 48

Over 48

50 to 59

Minus 26

26 to 31

31 to 36

36 to 31

41 to 45

Over 45

60 and over

Minus 20

20 to 26

26 to 32

33 to 36

36 to 44

More than 44

Table 3 Cooper running test protocol regarding physical fitness for men

Age group/Classification

Very poor

Poor

Enough

Good

Great

Higher

13-19

------

--------

-------

-------

-------

------

20-29

-------

---------

1

2

4

1

30-39

--------

---------

---------

 

------

------

40-49

--------

-------

--------

------

-----

------

50-59

-------

------

-------

------

------

-------

 

------

-------

1

2

4

1

Table 4 Cooper race test results for women the 8 women constitute 18.1% of the class aged between 20 and 29 years old and coincidentally correspond to an age group in the cooper VO2max race protocol, presented the following results

Age group/classification

Very poor

Poor

Enough

Good

Great

Higher

13-19

------

--------

1

------

1

------

20-29

-------

1

4

6

7

12

30-39

--------

---------

---------

3

------

1

40-49

--------

-------

--------

------

-----

------

50-59

-------

------

-------

------

------

-------

 

------

1

5

9

8

13

Table 5 Results of the cooper race test for men the 36 Men constitute 81.81% of the class and representing 3 age groups, according to the Cooper VO2max running protocol, presented the following results

No. in table 1

Age

VO2max X Weight = ml/kg/min

16

22

51.1 X 60 kg = 3,066 ml/kg/min

35

35

51.1 X 64 kg = 3,270 ml/kg/min

21

21

53.3 X 70 kg = 3,731 ml/kg/min

two

22

53.3 X 58 kg = 3,091 ml/kg/min

10

34

44.4 X 102 kg = 4,528 ml/kg/min

13

22

44.4 X 68 kg = 3,019 ml/kg/min

18

23

44.4 X 64 kg = 2,841 ml/kg/min

36

19

44.4 X 63 kg = 2,797 ml/kg/min

11

21

50.0 X 66 kg = 3,300 ml/kg/min

23

21

50.0 X 51 kg = 2,550 ml/kg/min

7

22

42.6 X 68 kg = 2,896 ml/kg/min

4

22

42.6 X 69 kg = 2,939 ml/kg/min

Table 6 Comparison of physical fitness between students who covered the same distance, but with different body weight

Discussion

After carrying out the exercise that resulted in the tables above, it was expected that, based on the results of the Cooper running test, women would present physical fitness capabilities similar to those of men, as mentioned in the bibliography that women can with stand prolonged efforts so well because their metabolism is processed more economically. Students with the same distance covered, which has greater weightuses a greater maximum volume of oxygen per unit of time (ml/min/kg), which suggests that it has better aerobic capacity level, comparative Table 6.  The result of the Cooper 12-minute running test (maximum test) helps to understand aerobic endurance capacity through maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) and reflects the person's health status (physical fitness), which corroborates reports that are included in the bibliography review.3–12

Conclusion

Of the 44 students who make up the sample, following the Cooper protocol for running, differentiated into women and men and grouped by age, they present the following levels of physical fitness: Poor 1=2.27% man; Sufficient 6=13.63% with 1 woman and 5 men; Good 11=25% being 2 women and 9 men; Excellent 12=27.27% being 4 women and 8 men and Superior 14=31.81% being 1 woman and 13 men. The VO2max values ​​presented are generally above the Good capacity by 84.08%. As for performance it can be seen that the student who has more body weight compared to the other with the same distance traveled uses a greater maximum volume of oxygen per unit of time (ml/min/kg), which leads to the consideration that comparatively he has a better Physical aptitude.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. Polookc Michael L, Wilmore Jakc. Physical exercises in health and illness. 2 edn. 1930.
  2. Kenneth H.Cooper. Aerobic Exercises – Physical fitness at any age.1982.
  3. Felipe Caamaño Navarrete, Pedro Delgado Floody, Daniel Jerez Mayorga,  et al. Low levels of physical performance, VO2MAX and high prevalence of obesity among school children from 9 to 14 years of age. Nutr Hosp. 2016;33(5):1045–1051.
  4. Jeferson Macedo Vianna. Aerobic exercises.
  5. Jogging.  A maintenance sport for the heart and circulatory system Training Tactical Technique Manfred Blondorn/Paul Schmidt LDA publishing house. Lisbon.
  6. https://finishermag.com/running/heres-why-runners-need-to-know-about-ma
  7. https://slideplayer.com.br/slide/3630050/ "cardiorespiratory capacity"
  8. https://finishermag.com/running/heres-why-runners-need-to-know-about-maximum-oxygen-uptake
  9. Assessment and classification of aerobic physical capacity of wheelchair basketball athletes evaluation.
  10. Antonelli CBB, Hartz CS, Santos SDS, et al. Effects of inspiratory muscle training with progressive loading on respiratory muscle function and sports performance in high-performance wheelchair basketball athletes: A randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2020;15(2):238–242.
  11. The effects of aerobic gymnastics on cardiorespiratory capacity in women.
  12. M Vanderthommen, M Francaux, C Colinet, et al. A multistage field test of wheelchair users for evaluation of fitness and prediction of peak oxygen consumption. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(6):685–692.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2024 Nhamitambo. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.