Submit manuscript...
International Journal of
eISSN: 2574-9889

Pregnancy & Child Birth

Mini Review Volume 11 Issue 2

Trans-catheter device closure of atrial septal defect in symptomatic children10 kg: expanding theboundaries of percutaneous therapy

Mirza Mohammad Kamran

Metromed International Cardiac Centre, India

Correspondence: Mirza Mohammad Kamran, Metromed International Cardiac Centre, Calicut, Kerala, India

Received: July 21, 2025 | Published: August 4, 2025

Citation: Kamran MM. Trans-catheter device closure of atrial septal defect in symptomatic children ≤10 kg: expanding the boundaries of percutaneous therapy. Pregnancy & Child Birth 2025;11(2):45-46. DOI: 10.15406/ipcb.2025.11.00321

Download PDF

Abstract

Trans-catheter device closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) has long been the treatment of choice in anatomically suitable children beyond early childhood. However, data on its feasibility and safety in infants and small children weighing ≤10 kg remain limited. This mini-review summarizes findings from a recent multicentric retrospective cohort study evaluating the outcomes of ASD device closure in symptomatic small children. The study highlights clinical indications, technical modifications, and midterm results. It demonstrates that percutaneous ASD closure is a safe and effective alternative to surgery in appropriately selected children below 10 kg, even in the presence of large defects and deficient septal rims.

Keywords: respiratory infections, pulmonary hypertension, rubella syndrome, anatomical assessment

Introduction

Traditionally, trans-catheter closure of secundum ASDs has been delayed until a child reaches 15–18 kg to reduce the risk of complications and ensure adequate device anchorage. However, earlier intervention may be necessary in children who exhibit recurrent respiratory infections, symptoms of heart failure, failure to thrive, or early signs of pulmonary hypertension.1–5

A major barrier to adopting ASD device closure in this lower weight group has been limited data and concerns about high device-to-weight ratios, floppy or deficient septal rims, and technical challenges. The study by Kamran et al. addresses these concerns by evaluating the safety, feasibility, and midterm outcomes of ASD closure in 85 symptomatic children weighing ≤10 kg across two high-volume tertiary cardiac centers in India.

Key study insights

Patient Profile

Mean age: 32 months

Mean weight: 9.17 kg

Gender distribution: 63% female

Comorbidities: Down syndrome, congenital rubella syndrome, Noonan’s syndrome, Goldenhar syndrome, cerebral palsy

High-altitude residence: 13%6–9

ASD characteristics

Mean ASD size: 14.9 mm

Mean Qp/Qs: 2.58

Mean pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR): 1.8 Wood units

Elevated pulmonary artery pressure: 18%

Deficient or floppy rims: Present in 76% of patients

Techniques used

LADED (Left Atrial Disc Engagement–Disengagement): 67%

Right Upper Pulmonary Vein (RUPV)-guided deployment: 15%

Conventional technique: 18%

Balloon- or catheter-assisted deployment: Not used in this cohort

Outcomes
Procedural success: 100%

Arrhythmias: 6 cases (5 SVTs responsive to adenosine, 1 complete heart block requiring pacemaker)

Average device-to-weight ratio: 1.9 (range up to 3.3 tolerated)

Device embolization or mortality: None

Catch-up growth and favorable cardiac remodeling: Observed in the majority at 1-year follow-up

Clinical relevance

This study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of trans-catheter ASD closure in children ≤10 kg with hemodynamically significant shunts. Key clinical implications include:

Device-to-weight ratios up to 3.3 can be well tolerated with appropriate case selection and modified deployment techniques.

Deficient rims are no longer absolute contraindications, especially when techniques such as LADED or RUPV-guided approaches are used.

Significant improvement in growth parameters and reduction in infection-related hospitalizations post-intervention.10–12
Transient arrhythmias, the most common complication, were generally manageable with medical therapy.

These results support the case for individualized treatment planning and reconsideration of rigid weight thresholds for ASD closure in infants.

Limitations & future directions

Retrospective design and absence of a control group limit definitive conclusions.
Lack of long-term follow-up beyond one year restricts insights into device integrity and late complications.
Standardized guidelines for device selection, especially regarding rim assessment and device sizing in small hearts, are needed.

Further prospective, multicenter studies with longer follow-up and larger sample sizes are essential to establish best practices in this evolving field.

Conclusion

Trans-catheter ASD closure in symptomatic children weighing ≤10 kg, once considered a high-risk endeavor, is emerging as a safe and effective therapeutic option when guided by meticulous anatomical assessment, individualized device sizing, and the use of refined deployment techniques. This approach could significantly reduce morbidity and hospitalization burden in this vulnerable population, especially in resource-limited settings.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shadildren and Adolesdy RE, Feltes TF. Moss and Adams heart disease in infants, including the fetus and young adult. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. p. 672.
  2. King TD, Milk NL. Nonoperative closure of atrial septal defects. Surgery. 1974;75(3):383–388.
  3. Jordan SC, Scott O. Acyanotic lesions with left–to–right shunts in heart diseases in pediatrics. Butterworth – Heinneman Ltd., Cambrige; 1994. p. 71–107.
  4. Park MK, Troxler RG. Left–to right shunt lesions in pediatric cardiology for practitioners. Mosby, St. Luois, London, Philadelphia, Sydney, Toronto; 2002. p. 129–154.
  5. Zanjani KS, Zeinaloo A, Malekan–Rad E, et al. Transcatheter atrial septal defect closure under transthorasic echocardiography in children. Iran J Pediatrics. 2011;21(4):473.
  6. Jalal Z, Hascoet S, Gronier C, et al. Long–term outcomes after percutaneous closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect in the young: A nationwide cohort study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(8):795–804.
  7. Poter CJ, Feldt RH, Edwards WD, et al. Moss and Adams heart diseases in infants, children and adolescents. In: Allen HD, Clark EB, Gutgesell HP, editors. Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New York, London, Buenos Aires, HongKong, Sydney, Tokio 2001. p. 603–617.
  8. Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, et al. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: Results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1836–1844.
  9. Berger F, Vogel M, Alexi–Meskishvili V, et al. Comparison of results and complications of surgical and Amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:674–678.
  10. Carminati M, Chessa M, Butera G, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with the STAR Flex device: Early results and follow–up. J Interv Cardiol. 2001;14:319–24.
  11. Diab KA, Cao QL, Bacha EA, et al. Device closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer septal occluder: Safety and outcome in infants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:960–966.
  12. Wyss Y, Quandt D, Weber R, et al. Interventional closure of secundum type atrial septal defects in infants less than 10 kilograms: Indications and procedural outcome. J Interv Cardiol. 2016;29:646–653.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2025 Kamran. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.