Research Article Volume 14 Issue 6
1Clinical Pathology Dep., Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
2Internal Medicine Dep., Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, Specialized Medical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Correspondence: Hany Shabana, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, Specialized Medical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Received: November 23, 2023 | Published: December 14, 2023
Citation: Waly F, El-Sayed Zaki M, Shabana H, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism of the promotor region of Interleukin-10 gene did not show significant association with spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus infection in Egyptian patients. Gastroenterol Hepatol Open Access. 2023;14(6):181-189. DOI: 10.15406/ghoa.2023.14.00565
Introduction: Accurate etiologies of spontaneous clearance of HCV infection are hard to be clarified. However, it is proposed that genetically determined interleukin-10 (IL-10) changes play an important function in HCV elimination. Individuals who are homozygous for IL-10 gene promoter region 1082 (G/A; rs1800896) genotype AA have significantly lower levels of plasma IL-10 levels with better capability of spontaneous viral clearance (SVC); while those with GG genotype have two folds greater level of IL-10 than GA or AA persons, leading to diminished capability of SVC.
Aims: The study aimed at identifying the IL-10 gene promoter region 1082 (G/A; rs1800896) polymorphism as a possible predictor of SVC of HCV infection in Egyptian patients and its relation with the viral load and the degree of liver injury in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients.
Methods: The study was conducted on two groups; group I which included 100 cases of CHC defined as detectable anti-HCV antibodies and detectable serum HCV RNA for ≥ 6 months and group II which included 50 cases of SVC defined as detectable anti-HCV antibodies for ≥ 6 months and undetectable HCV RNA in two consecutive tests, 3 months apart, without previous antiviral therapies. HCV antibody testing was done using 4th generation enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA) technique. HCV-RNA quantification was done using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Detection of IL10 1082 (G/A; rs1800896) polymorphism was done by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique. Complete blood count (CBC); serum albumin, serum bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), international normalized ratio (INR), serum creatinine and HBsAg, were done for all participants. Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class & FIB4 score were calculated. Abdominal ultra-sonography (US) and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen were done for all participants.
Results: In group I, the age was 53.6±11.2 years old, males represented 51% and females represented 49%. In group II, the age was 52.8±8.6 years old, males represented 48% and females represented 52%. No significant differences were found regarding age and gender (p=0.658, 0.729 respectively). Group I showed significantly higher frequency of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly & liver cirrhosis (p < 0.001) and significantly lower platelet count (PLC) (183.5±61.1 versus 220.3±67.2 ×109/L, p=0.006). Group I showed significantly higher ALT, AST & FIB4 score (p <0.001, 0.002, <0.001 respectively). Group I had median viral load of 555640 IU/mL. Applying Hardy Weinberg (HW) equation, IL10 1082 (G/A; rs1800896) genotypes in both groups were in HW equilibrium (HW p=0.845&0.861 respectively). In Group I, genotype AA represented 72%, AG represented 26% & GG represented 2%, while in Group II, genotype AA represented 62%, AG represented 34% & GG represented 4% ,with insignificant differences between both groups (p=0.272, 0.415 & 0.216 respectively). In Group I, no significant differences regarding HCV RNA load ,CTP class, PLC , FIB4 score ,were found between the three genotypes (p=0.191, 0.086, 0.754,0.829, 0.187 respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that IL10 1082 (G/A; rs1800896) genotypes was not a significant predictor of SVC of HCV infection in Egyptian patients (p=0.216.OR=1.322, 95% CI=0.849-2.058).
Conclusion: Single nucleotide polymorphism of the promoter region of the IL-10 gene, 1082 (G/A; rs1800896), did not show significant association with the spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus infection in Egyptian patients. In chronic hepatitis C patients, this SNP had no significant association with the serum HCV viral load, CTP class, PLC or FIB4 score.
Keywords: chronic hepatitis C, single nucleotide polymorphism, IL-10, spontaneous viral clearance, the promoter region, 1082 G/A; rs1800896; Egypt
ANOVA, analysis of variance AHC, acute hepatitis C; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AFP, Alpha fetoprotein; AFP-L3, lens culinaris agglutination reactive AFP; AFU, alpha-l-fucosidase; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AUC, area under curve; CBC, complete blood count; CD, cluster differentiation; CI, confidence interval; CHC, chronic hepatitis C; CRP, C-reactive protein; CT, computed tomography; CTP, Child -Turcotte -Pugh; CSIF, cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor; DAAs, Direct acting antiviral agents; DM, Diabetes Mellitus; EDHS, Egyptian demographic health survey; ELISA, Enzyme-Linked immuno Sorbent Assay; HBV, Hepatitis B Virus; HCC, Hepatocellular Carcinoma; HCV, Hepatitis C Virus; HW, Hardy Weinberg; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IFN-γ, Interferon gamma; INR, International Normalized Ratio; IL-10, Interleukin-10; MDCT, Multi Detector CT; NASH, Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis; N/L, neutrophil/lymphocyte; NPV, negative predictive value; OR, Odds Ratio; OS, Overall Survival; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PLC, platelet count; PT, prothrombin time; PPV, positive predictive value; RBCs, red blood cells; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic curve; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; SMH, specialized medical hospital; Sn, sensitivity; SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms; Sp, Specificity; SVC, spontaneous viral clearance; TPO, thrombopoietin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; Th2, T-helper 2; US, ultra sound; VL, viral load; WBCs, white blood cells
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Egypt had the greatest frequency worldwide (14.7% of the population). Its incidence in Egypt ranged from 0.8 to 6.8 per 1,000 person-years. The predominant genotype in Egypt is type four (73% of the cases). The source, development and dynamics are hard to determine.1 Risk factors for HCV infection involve history of anti-schistosomal injection therapy prior to 1986, old age, male sex and rural residency.2 Chronic HCV infection usually causes chronic inflammation with subsequent hepatic damage and fibrosis which progresses to cirrhosis and finally hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).3 However, a small number of cases (20%) mount an immune response that efficiently overcomes the infection.4 Patients with acute HCV infection who undergo spontaneous viral clearance (SVC) had positive anti HCV antibody for more than 6 months with undetectable HCV RNA in the serum; without therapy. Since oscillations in HCV RNA detection are commonly noticed in the initial stage of HCV infection, two successive negative HCV RNA test results were needed to confirm SVC.5 Cytokines influence the natural course of HCV infection. They represent a large family of molecules, that have an essential role in the beginning and controlling of immune response, and consequently, cytokines might influence HCV infection outcomes.6 Interleukin 10 (IL-10) is a multifunctional cytokine that down regulates the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines and has a modulatory effect on hepatic fibrogenesis. IL-10, also known as human cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor (CSIF), is an anti-inflammatory cytokine. In humans, IL-10 is encoded by the IL10 gene which is located on chromosome 1 and comprises 5 exons. The IL-10 protein is a homodimer; each of its subunits is 178-amino-acid long.7 IL 10 is mainly created by monocytes with little amounts by lymphocytes, type 2 T helper cells (Th2), mast cells, CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, and in some subset of stimulated T cells and B cells.8 Persons with IL-10 1082 (G/A; rs1800896) GG genotype create greater values of IL-10 than GA or AA persons. Moreover, IL-10 is a potent suppressor of pro-inflammatory mediators including IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ. It was thought that, higher creation of IL-10 might enhance viral escape by down regulation of the protective Th1 response.9
Aim of work
The study aimed at identifying the IL-10 gene promoter region 1082 (G/A; rs1800896) polymorphism as a possible predictor of spontaneous viral clearance of HCV infection and its relation with the viral load and the degree of liver injury in Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C.
Type, place & duration of the study
This study was a single center, case- control study. The work was conducted on two groups; group I which included 100 cases of chronic hepatitis C infection (CHC) defined as detectable anti-HCV antibodies and detectable serum HCV RNA for ≥ 6 months and group II which included 50 cases of spontaneous viral clearance (SVC) defined as detectable anti-HCV antibodies for ≥ 6 months, and undetectable HCV RNA in two consecutive tests, 3 months apart, without previous antiviral therapies. All participants were recruited from outpatient clinic of Hepatology & Gastroenterology unit, Internal Medicine department, Specialized Medical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University. The molecular study was carried out in molecular biology laboratory of Clinical Immunology unit, Clinical Pathology Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. The study extended from 1/2017 to 1/2018.
Ethical considerations
Study protocol was accepted by the medical ethics research committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University (Code number: MS/16.11.04). Each participant in the study, after assuring confidentiality, has given an informed written consent.
Inclusion criteria
The enrolled participants were adult patients with chronic hepatitis C defined as detectable anti-HCV antibodies and serum HCV RNA for more than 6 months of follow up and adult patients with detectable anti-HCV antibodies, who underwent spontaneous viral clearance, with undetectable HCV RNA in two consecutive tests over a minimum time interval of 3 months, within 12 months of follow up without treatment.
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria were HBV or HIV co-infection, Alcohol ingestion, other etiologies of chronic liver disease, patients with HCV related HCC and patients with other malignancies (Figure 1).
All enrolled participants were subjected to thorough clinical history, full clinical examination and laboratory investigations. CBC including total leucocyte count (TLC), neutrophil / lymphocyte N/L) ratio and platelet count (PLC) was done by automated blood cell counter (Sysmex XS-500i). Serum albumin, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT); aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and creatinine were done by clinical chemistry analyzer (Cobas C 311). INR was done using Behnk Elektronik Coagulator. Anti HCV antibodies, Anti HIV antibodies and HBs-Ag were done by 4th generation ELISA technique. Serum level of HCV-RNA was measured by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Applied Biosystems Step One Real-Time PCR System, Thermal Cycling Block. Evaluation of the degree of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis was done by FIB4 score which was calculated using the following formula: (Age × AST) / (Platelets × sqr ALT)). Child -Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score was calculated. CTP class was considered class A if the score was 5-6 points, class B if score was 7-9 points and class C if the score was 10-15 points (Table 1).
Parameter |
1 point |
2 points |
3 points |
Albumin (mg/dl) |
>3.5 |
2.8-3.5 |
< 2.8 |
Bilirubin (mg/dl) |
<2 |
3-Feb |
>3 |
INR |
<1.7 |
1.7-2.3 |
>2.3 |
Ascites |
No |
Mild |
Moderate, severe |
Hepatic encephalopathy |
none |
Grade 1-2 |
Grade 3-4 |
Table 1 CTP score & class of the severity of liver disease
Molecular study
All enrolled participants were subjected to molecular study regarding IL-10 gene promoter region 1082 (G/A; rs1800896) polymorphism. DNA was isolated from whole blood by Gene JET Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kits from Thermo Scientific (lot 00132789).Ten ml of venous blood samples were collected from peripheral vein by clean vein puncture. Samples were stored at (-20◦c) until the time of molecular biology techniques for detection of IL10 (1082) A/G polymorphism by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed by SPSS software, version 25 (SPSS Inc., PASW statistics for windows version 25. Chicago: SPSS Inc.). Qualitative data were described using number and percent. Quantitative data were described using median for non-normally distributed data and mean ± Standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data, after testing normality using Kolmogrov-Smirnov test. Chi-Square, Fisher exact test, Monte Carlo tests were used to compare qualitative data as appropriate. Kruskal Wallis was used to compare between more than 2 studied groups, respectively for non-normally distributed data. One Way ANOVA test was used to compare more than 2 independent groups with Post Hoc Tukey test to detect pair-wise comparison. Logistic regression analysis was used for detection of SVC predictors using generalized linear models. Deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium expectations were determined using the chi-squared test. Significance of the obtained results was judged at the ≤0.05 value.
The mean age of CHC group was 53.6 years, they were 51 males (51%) and 49 females (49%). The mean age of SVC group was 52.8 years, they were 24 males (48%) and 26 females (52%). There were insignificant differences regarding age, gender, anthropometric data, DM and smoking between both groups. CHC patients showed significantly higher frequency of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly and liver cirrhosis. Patients with CHC had CTP class A in 92% & CTP class B in 7%. All SVC subjects had CTP class A (Table 2 & 3).
Chronic hepatitis C N=100 |
Spontaneous viral clearance N=50 |
P |
|||||
Age (years) |
Mean ±SD |
53.6 |
11.2 |
52.8 |
8.6 |
0.658 |
|
Males |
N, % |
51 |
51 |
24 |
48 |
0.729 |
|
Females |
N, % |
49 |
49 |
26 |
52 |
||
Weight (kg) |
Mean ±SD |
88.1 |
11.1 |
88.2 |
13.4 |
0.985 |
|
Height (cm) |
Mean ±SD |
166.5 |
6.9 |
167.2 |
7.7 |
0.561 |
|
BMI (Kg/m2) |
Mean data ±SD |
31.8 |
4.1 |
31.5 |
4.2 |
0.611 |
|
Smoking |
N, % |
33 |
33 |
13 |
26 |
0.381 |
|
DM |
N, % |
28 |
28 |
7 |
14 |
0.056 |
|
Hepatomegaly |
N, % |
22 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
<0.001 |
|
Splenomegaly |
N, % |
32 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
<0.001 |
|
Cirrhosis |
N, % |
35 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
<0.001 |
|
Ascites |
N, % |
6 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0.178 |
|
CTP class |
A |
N, % |
92 |
92 |
50 |
100 |
0.096 |
B |
N, % |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
Table 2 Comparison of baseline clinical & radiological data of the studied groups
Chronic hepatitis C N=100 |
Spontaneous viral clearance N=50 |
P |
||||
TLC (109/L) |
Mean ±SD |
7.4 |
2.3 |
5.6 |
1.5 |
0.129 |
Neutrophil (%) |
Mean ±SD |
50.5 |
11.4 |
47.6 |
11.3 |
0.142 |
Lymphocytes (%) |
Mean ±SD |
39.1 |
11.3 |
40.7 |
9.9 |
0.389 |
N/L ratio |
Mean ±SD |
1.5 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
0.3 |
0.781 |
Hemoglobin (g/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
13.1 |
2.2 |
12.5 |
1.5 |
0.068 |
Platelets (×109/L) |
Mean ±SD |
183.5 |
61.1 |
220.3 |
67.2 |
0.006 |
INR |
Mean ±SD |
1.1 |
0.1 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
0.341 |
Glucose (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
119.2 |
53.5 |
119.5 |
37.8 |
0.14 |
AST (U/L) |
Mean ±SD |
49.5 |
36.1 |
27.3 |
13 |
<0.001 |
ALT (U/L) |
Mean ±SD |
47.4 |
34 |
31 |
14.2 |
0.002 |
FIB4 score |
Mean ±SD |
2.9 |
3 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
<0.001 |
Albumin (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
4.2 |
0.6 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
0.214 |
Bilirubin (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
0.8 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.156 |
Creatinine (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
0.327 |
VL (IU/mL) |
Median, range |
555640 |
6500-800114000 |
- |
- |
- |
Low VL |
N, % |
17 |
17% |
- |
- |
- |
Moderate VL |
N, % |
36 |
36% |
- |
- |
- |
High VL |
N, % |
47 |
47% |
- |
- |
- |
Table 3 Comparison of laboratory data of the studied groups
CHC patients had significantly higher ALT, AST & FIB4 score. They also had significantly lower PLC than SVC subjects. Otherwise, no significant differences were found regarding laboratory data of CHC and SVC groups. Median viral load (VL) in CHC group was 555640 IU/mL, ranging from 6500 to 800114000 IU/mL; with 17% of the cases had low viral load, 36% had moderate viral load and 47% had high viral load (Figure 2).
Deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium HWE) expectations were determined using the chi-squared test. This sample of individuals was randomly selected from population in Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt. Applying Hardy Weinberg equation revealed that rs1800896 genotypes in CHC as well as in SVC groups were in HWE (Table 4).
Chronic hepatitis C N=100 |
Spontaneous viral clearance N=50 |
|||
Observed |
Expected |
Observed |
Expected |
|
AA |
72 |
72.3 |
31 |
31.2 |
AG |
26 |
25.5 |
17 |
16.6 |
GG |
2 |
2.3 |
2 |
2.2 |
HW p |
0.845 |
0.861 |
Table 4 Assessment of Hardy Weinberg equilibrium in the studied groups
IL10 rs1800896 AA genotype (ancestral or major genotype) showed frequency of 72% in CHC group and 62% in SVC group. AG genotype showed frequency of 26% in CHC group and 34% in SVC group. The alternative genotype (GG) showed frequency of 2% in CHC group and 4% in SVC group. Dominant model (AG+GG) showed frequency of 28% in CHC group and 38% in SVC group. Calculation of allele frequency in studied groups revealed that the ancestral or major allele (A) showed frequency of 85% in CHC group and 79% in SVC group, while alternative or minor allele (G) showed frequency of 15% in CHC group and 21% in SVC group. Taking AA as the reference genotype and A as the reference allele; IL10 (rs1800896) genotypes and alleles did not show significant association with SVC (p=0.272, 0.415, 0.216, 0.192 respectively) (Table 5 & Figure 3).
CHC N=100 |
SVC N=50 |
p |
OR |
95% CI |
|||
AA |
72 |
72 |
31 |
62 |
- |
1 |
(Reference) |
AG |
26 |
26 |
17 |
34 |
0.272 |
1.292 |
0.818-2.040 |
GG |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
0.415 |
1.685 |
0.481-5.906 |
AG+GG |
28 |
28 |
19 |
38 |
0.216 |
1.322 |
0.849-2.058 |
A |
170 |
85 |
79 |
79 |
- |
1 |
(Reference) |
G |
30 |
15 |
21 |
21 |
0.192 |
1.506 |
0.812-2.795 |
Table 5 Comparison of rs1800896 genotypes and alleles of the studied groups
Table 6 shows that there were insignificant differences regarding clinical and radiologic data of IL10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in CHC group.
CHC |
AA N=72 |
AG N=26 |
GG N=2 |
AG+GG N=28 |
A N=170 |
G N=30 |
P1 |
P2 |
P3 |
|
Age (years) |
Mean ±SD |
52.6 11.4 |
55.8 10.2 |
60.5 10.6 |
56.1 10.1 |
53.1 11.3 |
56.4 10.1 |
0.305 |
0.151 |
0.127 |
Males |
N % |
38 52.8 |
12 46.2 |
1 50 |
13 46.4 |
88 51.8 |
14 46.7 |
0.834 |
0.568 |
0.607 |
Females |
N % |
34 47.2 |
14 53.8 |
1 50 |
15 53.6 |
82 48.2 |
16 53.3 |
|||
Weight (kg) |
Mean ±SD |
88.1 11.4 |
88.5 10.7 |
85 7.1 |
88.3 10.4 |
88.2 11.3 |
88.1 10.2 |
0.909 |
0.935 |
0.969 |
Height (cm) |
Mean ±SD |
166.1 6.8 |
167.5 7.6 |
166.5 3.5 |
167.5 7.4 |
166.4 6.9 |
167.4 7.2 |
0.677 |
0.39 |
0.443 |
BMI(Kg/m2) |
Mean ±SD |
31.9 4.3 |
31.5 3.7 |
30.7 3.8 |
4.3 3.6 |
31.9 4.2 |
31.5 3.6 |
0.852 |
0.619 |
0.582 |
Smoking |
N % |
24 33.3 |
8 30.8 |
1 50 |
9 32.1 |
56 32.9 |
10 33.3 |
0.851 |
0.909 |
0.966 |
DM |
N % |
20 27.8 |
8 30.8 |
0 0 |
8 28.6 |
48 28.2 |
8 26.7 |
0.898 |
0.937 |
0.86 |
Hepatomegaly |
N % |
17 23.6 |
5 19.2 |
0 0 |
5 17.9 |
39 22.9 |
5 16.7 |
0.872 |
0.533 |
0.444 |
Splenomegaly |
N % |
22 30.6 |
10 38.5 |
0 0 |
10 35.7 |
54 31.8 |
10 33.3 |
0.528 |
0.62 |
0.865 |
Cirrhosis |
N % |
25 34.7 |
9 34.6 |
1 50 |
10 35.7 |
59 34.7 |
11 36.7 |
0.904 |
0.926 |
0.836 |
Ascites |
N % |
2 2.8 |
4 15.4 |
0 0 |
4 14.3 |
8 4.7 |
4 13.3 |
0.073 |
0.051 |
0.086 |
CTP class A |
N % |
69 95.8 |
21 80.8 |
2 100 |
23 82.1 |
159 93.5 |
25 83.3 |
0.191 |
0.086 |
0.13 |
CTP class B |
N % |
3 4.2 |
4 15.4 |
0 0 |
4 14.3 |
10 5.9 |
4 13.3 |
Table 6 Comparison of clinical and radiologic data of IL10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in CHC group
P1= comparison between AA, AG GG; P2= comparison between AG + GG versus AA; P3= comparison between alleles.
Table 7 shows that there was insignificant differences regarding the laboratory data between IL10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in CHC group.
CHC |
AA N=72 |
AG N=26 |
GG N=2 |
AG+GG N=28 |
A N=170 |
G N=30 |
P1 |
P2 |
P3 |
|
TLC (×109/L) |
Mean ±SD |
7.5 1.1 |
6.9 2.1 |
7.8 1.2 |
6.9 2.1 |
7.5 5.7 |
7 2.5 |
0.862 |
0.624 |
0.686 |
Neutrophil (%) |
Mean ±SD |
51.5 11.5 |
47.5 10.8 |
52 12.7 |
47.8 10.8 |
50.9 11.5 |
48.1 10.8 |
0.306 |
0.148 |
0.217 |
Lymphocytes (%) |
Mean ±SD |
38.6 11.8 |
40 10.1 |
42.5 4.9 |
40.1 9.8 |
38.8 11.6 |
40.3 9.6 |
0.791 |
0.537 |
0.501 |
N/L ratio |
Mean ±SD |
1.6 0.5 |
1.2 0.4 |
1.2 0.4 |
1.3 0.3 |
1.6 1.2 |
1.3 0.6 |
0.375 |
0.16 |
0.174 |
Hemoglobin (g/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
12.9 2.3 |
13.2 1.9 |
15.5 0.7 |
13.4 1.9 |
13 2.3 |
13.6 2 |
0.266 |
0.373 |
0.222 |
Platelets (×109/L) |
Mean ±SD |
180.4 51.6 |
193.3 63.5 |
167 16.9 |
191.5 60.7 |
182.4 81.6 |
189.9 78.2 |
0.754 |
0.542 |
0.642 |
INR |
Mean ±SD |
1.1 0.1 |
1.1 0.1 |
1.1 0.1 |
1.1 0.1 |
1.1 0.1 |
1.1 0.1 |
0.868 |
0.807 |
0.916 |
Glucose (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
121.7 58.8 |
114.8 37.4 |
86.5 0.7 |
112.8 36.7 |
120.6 55.8 |
111 36.1 |
0.189 |
0.689 |
0.364 |
AST (U/L) |
Mean ±SD |
50.3 36.2 |
46.3 37.7 |
62 8.5 |
47.4 36.5 |
49.7 36.2 |
48.4 35.5 |
0.463 |
0.893 |
0.856 |
Normal AST (U/L) |
N % |
43 59.70% |
15 57.70% |
0 0% |
15 53.60% |
101 87.10% |
15 12.90% |
0.31 |
0.576 |
0.336 |
High AST (U/L) |
N % |
29 40.30% |
11 42.30% |
2 100% |
13 46.40% |
69 82.10% |
15 17.90% |
|||
ALT (U/L) |
Mean ±SD |
46.1 28 |
48.9 47.4 |
76.5 19.1 |
50.8 46.4 |
46.5 31.5 |
52.5 45.4 |
0.24 |
0.794 |
0.369 |
Normal ALT (U/L) |
N % |
44 61.10% |
16 61.50% |
0 0% |
16 57.10% |
104 86.70% |
16 13.30% |
0.294 |
0.716 |
0.419 |
High ALT (U/L) |
N % |
288 3.90% |
10 38.50% |
2 100% |
12 42.90% |
66 82.50% |
14 17.50% |
|||
FIB4 |
Mean ±SD |
3 3.3 |
2.6 2.1 |
2.6 0 |
2.6 2 |
3 |
2.6 2 |
0.829 |
0.721 |
0.571 |
Albumin (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
4.2 0.4 |
4 0.7 |
4.5 0.2 |
4 0.7 |
4.2 0.5 |
4.1 0.7 |
0.169 |
0.154 |
0.304 |
Bilirubin (mg/dL) |
Mean ±SD |
0.8 0.2 |
0.8 0.1 |
0.8 0.2 |
0.7 0.2 |
0.8 0.3 |
0.8 0.3 |
0.999 |
0.985 |
0.978 |
Creatinine (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
0.9 0.2 |
0.9 0.2 |
0.7 0.1 |
0.9 0.2 |
0.9 0.24 |
0.9 0.21 |
0.577 |
0.708 |
0.925 |
VL (iu/ml) |
Median Range |
622910.5 6500-800114000 |
605729.5 20207-31300000 |
80524.5 69502-91547 |
461190 20207-31300000 |
605729.5 6500-800114000 |
342199.5 20207-31300000 |
0.187 |
0.45 |
0.241 |
Low VL |
N % |
11 15.30% |
4 15.40% |
2 100.00% |
6 21.40% |
26 15.30% |
8 26.70% |
0.154 |
0.768 |
0.305 |
Moderate VL |
N % |
26 36.10% |
10 38.50% |
0 0.00% |
10 35.70% |
62 36.50% |
10 33.30% |
|||
High VL |
N % |
35 48.60% |
12 46.20% |
0 0.00% |
12 42.90% |
82 48.20% |
12 40.00% |
Table 7 Comparison of laboratory data of IL10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in CHC group
P1= comparison between AA, AG GG; P2 = comparison between AG+GG versus AA; P3= comparison between alleles.
Table 8 shows that there was insignificant differences regarding clinical and radiologic data of IL10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in SVC group.
SVC |
AA N=31 |
AG N=17 |
GG N=2 |
AG+GG N=19 |
A N=79 |
G N=21 |
P1 |
P2 |
P3 |
|
Age (years) |
Mean ±SD |
54 8.5 |
51.4 8.6 |
44.5 7.7 |
50.6 8.6 |
53.5 8.5 |
50.1 8.6 |
0.237 |
0.186 |
0.11 |
Males |
N % |
16 51.6 |
7 41.2 |
1 50 |
8 42.1 |
39 49.4 |
9 42.9 |
0.772 |
0.514 |
0.596 |
Females |
N % |
15 48.4 |
10 58.8 |
1 50 |
11 57.9 |
40 50.6 |
12 57.1 |
|||
Weight (kg) |
Mean ±SD |
89.1 13 |
86.3 14.7 |
89 11.3 |
86.6 14.1 |
88.5 13.3 |
86.9 13.7 |
0.794 |
0.528 |
0.611 |
Height (cm) |
Mean ±SD |
167.6 8.7 |
165.65 5.219 |
174.5 4.9 |
166.5 5.7 |
167.2 8 |
167.3 6.1 |
0.275 |
0.629 |
0.961 |
BMI(Kg/m2) |
Mean ±SD |
31.6 3.9 |
31.3 4.7 |
29.1 2.1 |
3.9 4.5 |
31.6 4.1 |
31 4.4 |
0.71 |
0.664 |
0.519 |
Smoking |
N % |
8 25.8 |
5 29.4 |
0 0 |
5 26.3 |
21 26.6 |
5 23.8 |
0.668 |
0.968 |
0.797 |
DM |
N % |
6 19.4 |
1 5.9 |
0 0 |
1 5.3 |
13 16.5 |
1 4.8 |
0.554 |
0.229 |
0.289 |
Table 8 Comparison of clinical and radiologic data of IL10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in SVC group
P1=comparison between AA, AG GG; P2= comparison between AG + GG versus AA; P3= comparison between alleles.
Table 9 shows that there was insignificant differences regarding laboratory data of IL10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in SVC group.
SVC |
AA N=31 |
AG N=17 |
GG N=2 |
AG+GG N=19 |
A N=79 |
G N=21 |
P1 |
P2 |
P3 |
|
TLC (×109/L) |
Mean ±SD |
5.8 1.5 |
5.3 1.73 |
6.2 0.4 |
5.4 1.6 |
5.7 1.6 |
5.5 1.6 |
0.58 |
0.43 |
0.607 |
Neutrophil (%) |
Mean ±SD |
47.3 12.1 |
47.7 10.8 |
49 2.8 |
47.9 10.2 |
47.4 11.7 |
48 9.8 |
0.977 |
0.872 |
0.842 |
Lymphocytes (%) |
Mean ±SD |
40.9 10.9 |
39.3 8.2 |
48.5 0.7 |
40.3 8.3 |
40.6 10.3 |
41 8.3 |
0.46 |
0.819 |
0.849 |
N/L ratio |
Mean ±SD |
1.5 0.8 |
1.5 0.8 |
1 0.1 |
1.4 0.7 |
1.5 0.8 |
1.3 0.7 |
0.716 |
0.807 |
0.544 |
Hemoglobin (g/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
12.6 1.4 |
12.2 1.7 |
11.4 1.5 |
12.2 1.6 |
12.6 1.5 |
12.1 1.7 |
0.476 |
0.322 |
0.242 |
Platelets (×109/L) |
Mean ±SD |
224.5 71.5 |
210.3 61.8 |
238.5 58.6 |
213.3 60.6 |
221.5 69 |
215.7 59.5 |
0.734 |
0.573 |
0.728 |
INR |
Mean ±SD |
1.2 0.1 |
1.1 0.1 |
1 0.01 |
1.2 0.1 |
1.1 0.1 |
1.1 0.1 |
0.564 |
0.959 |
0.759 |
Glucose (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
121.8 42.6 |
115.2 30.4 |
121.5 16.3 |
115.9 29 |
120.4 39.9 |
116.4 27.8 |
0.654 |
0.992 |
0.672 |
AST (U/L) |
Mean ±SD |
28.5 14.6 |
24.6 9.4 |
33 15.6 |
25.5 9.9 |
27.6 13.6 |
26.2 10.3 |
0.664 |
0.794 |
0.655 |
Normal AST(U/L) |
N % |
25 80.60% |
15 88.20% |
1 50% |
16 84.20% |
65 79.30% |
17 20.70% |
0.403 |
0.75 |
0.888 |
High AST(U/L) |
N % |
6 19.40% |
2 11.80% |
1 50% |
3 15.80% |
14 77.80% |
4 22.20% |
|||
ALT (U/L) |
Mean ±SD |
31.1 15.4 |
30.5 12.9 |
34 2.8 |
30.9 12.2 |
31 14.7 |
31.2 11.6 |
0.681 |
0.653 |
0.956 |
Normal ALT(U/L) |
N % |
25 80.60% |
15 88.20% |
2 100% |
17 89.50% |
65 77.40% |
19 22.60% |
0.785 |
0.693 |
0.511 |
High ALT(U/L) |
N % |
6 19.40% |
2 11.80% |
0 0% |
2 10.50% |
14 87.50% |
2 12.50% |
|||
FIB4 score |
Mean ±SD |
1.3 0.4 |
1.3 0.6 |
1.2 1 |
1.3 0.6 |
1.3 0.5 |
1.3 0.6 |
0.683 |
0.384 |
0.825 |
Albumin (g/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
4.2 0.4 |
4.2 0.3 |
4.4 0.4 |
4.3 0.3 |
4.3 0.4 |
4.3 0.4 |
0.857 |
0.658 |
0.595 |
Bilirubin (mg/dl) |
Mean ±SD |
0.6 0.1 |
0.8 0.6 |
0.5 0.1 |
0.7 0.5 |
0.7 0.3 |
0.7 0.6 |
0.442 |
0.323 |
0.509 |
Creatinine (mg/dL) |
Mean ±SD |
0.8 0.2 |
0.8 0.1 |
0.7 0.1 |
0.8 0.2 |
0.9 0.2 |
0.8 0.2 |
0.287 |
0.206 |
0.132 |
Table 9 Comparison of laboratory data of IL10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in SVC group
P1= comparison between AA, AG GG; P2= comparison between AG+GG versus AA; P3= comparison between alleles
Logistic regression analysis was conducted for prediction of SVC using gender, BMI, N/L ratio, INR, AST, ALT, FIB4, IL10 genotypes and alleles as covariates. Lower ALT, AST and FIB4 were significant predictors of SVC in univariable analysis. However, taking significant covariates into multivariate analysis revealed that only lower FIB4 was considered significant predictor of SVC (Table 10 & 11). Logistic regression analysis was conducted for prediction of CHC using gender, BMI, N/L ratio, INR, AST, ALT, FIB4, IL10 genotypes and alleles as covariates. Higher ALT, AST and FIB4 were significant predictors of CHC in univariable analysis. However, taking significant covariates into multivariate analysis revealed that only higher FIB4 was considered significant predictor of CHC.10
Univariable |
Multivariable |
|||||||
p |
OR |
95% CI |
p |
OR |
95% CI |
|||
Gender |
0.762 |
0.926 |
0.563 |
1.522 |
||||
BMI(Kg/m2) |
0.282 |
0.965 |
0.903 |
1.03 |
||||
N/L ratio |
0.79 |
0.966 |
0.748 |
1.247 |
||||
INR |
0.804 |
1.403 |
0.097 |
2.293 |
||||
AST(U/L) |
<0.001 |
0.956 |
0.932 |
0.98 |
0.172 |
0.982 |
0.958 |
1.008 |
ALT(U/L) |
0.002 |
0.969 |
0.95 |
0.989 |
0.607 |
1.006 |
0.985 |
1.027 |
FIB4 score |
0.006 |
0.64 |
0.464 |
0.882 |
0.049 |
0.718 |
0.515 |
0.999 |
IL10 (AG+GG) |
0.216 |
1.322 |
0.849 |
2.058 |
||||
IL10 alleles |
0.192 |
1.506 |
0.812 |
2.795 |
Table 10 Logistic regression analysis for prediction of SVC
Univariable |
Multivariable |
|||||||
P |
OR |
95% CI |
p |
OR |
95% CI |
|||
Gender |
0.762 |
1.08 |
0.657 |
1.776 |
||||
BMI(Kg/m2) |
0.282 |
1.037 |
0.971 |
1.107 |
||||
N/L ratio |
0.79 |
1.04 |
0.804 |
1.344 |
||||
INR |
0.804 |
0.835 |
0.06 |
11.57 |
||||
AST(U/L) |
<0.001 |
1.018 |
1.004 |
1.033 |
0.525 |
1.008 |
0.983 |
1.034 |
ALT(U/L) |
0.002 |
1.012 |
1 |
1.025 |
0.624 |
0.995 |
0.973 |
1.016 |
FIB4 score |
0.006 |
1.573 |
1.139 |
2.174 |
0.042 |
1.487 |
0.981 |
2.256 |
IL10 (AG+GG) |
0.216 |
0.756 |
0.542 |
1.608 |
||||
IL10 alleles |
0.192 |
0.664 |
0.358 |
1.232 |
Table 11 Logistic regression analysis for prediction of CHC
The outcome of HCV infection may be affected by many factors including mode of transmission, alcohol intake, gender, viral strain, coinfection with other viruses and host immune response. The impact of the cytokine gene polymorphisms on the pathogenesis of HCV infection has also been investigated.11 IL-10 is an immunoregulatory cytokine produced by Th2 cells, monocytes, macrophages, and regulatory T cells. It negatively regulates the response of Th1 lymphocytes and suppresses the action of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-2, TNF-α & IFN-γ. On the other hand, it has antifibrogenic effect.12 Its production and plasma levels vary among individuals due to three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (-1082 G/A, -819 C/T and -592 C/A) in the promoter region of the IL-10 gene. IL-10 polymorphic variants have been found to play an important role in the outcome of HCV infection.13 Individuals who are homozygous for IL-10 AA at position (-1082) have significantly lower levels of plasma IL-10 levels with better ability to spontaneously clear HCV infection. Individuals who show (-1082) G/G genotype have been shown to produce two fold greater quantities of IL-10 when compared to individuals exhibiting the A/A or G/A genotypes with less ability to clear the virus.9
The present study found that IL10 rs1800896 AA genotype (major genotype) showed frequency of 72% in CHC group and 62% in SVC group. The alternative genotype (GG) showed frequency of 2% in CHC group and 4% in SVC group. AG genotype showed frequency of 26% in CHC group and 34% in SVC group. Dominant model (AG+GG) showed frequency of 28% in CHC group and 38% in SVC group. Calculation of allele frequency in the studied groups revealed that the major allele (A) showed frequency of 85% in CHC group and 79% in SVC group, while alternative or minor allele (G) showed frequency of 15% in CHC group and 21% in SVC group. Taking AA as the reference genotype and A as the reference allele; IL-10 (rs1800896) genotypes and alleles did not show significant association with SVC. Earlier studies concerning IL-10 promoter (-1082) polymorphism rs1800896 and HCV infection outcome were controversial. A study reported an association of the GG genotype with persistent infection and AG genotype with self-limiting infection.14 Another study revealed an association of the GG genotype with persistent infection, although this was based on a comparison with healthy controls.11 It was reported that that AG genotype was higher in controls than in HCV patients, while genotype GG was higher in CHC patients.9 This was explained by the mechanism that GG genotype was associated with high IL10 production with downregulation of Th1 response, resulting in failure of HCV eradication and perpetuation of viral infection.15
On the contrary, a study showed that GG genotype was highest in patients with SVC compared to those with CHC, suggesting that an increased production of IL-10 was protective against CHC.16 Also, Ramos et al. suggested that the AA genotype was more frequently observed in patients with CHC, while GG genotype was more frequently seen in those with SVC. They claimed that IL-10 may have anti-fibrotic properties that could lead to a slow progression of liver disease.17 It was found that there was no significant association between polymorphisms in the IL-10 (-1082, -819) or cytokine haplotype and either HCV clearance or severity of hepatitis.18 Another study conducted in England revealed that IL-10 (-1082) genotype did not contribute to HCV clearance. An Egyptian study comparing CHC and SVC patients found no significant differences regarding both the genotypes and alleles of IL-10 (-1082) rs1800896 gene.19
Another Egyptian study reported that the distribution of the different IL-10 rs1800896 genotypes was similar in the healthy controls and HCV patients.13 These conflicting results could be due to several factors such as differences in sample size, genetic heterogeneity of various populations and different gene–gene or gene–environment interactions. It could be also due to differences in ethnic groups of patients and differences in distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes among population that might affect the outcome of the infection.20 The present study showed that there were no significant differences in clinical and radiologic data regarding IL-10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles in either CHC or SVC groups. Similarly, another study did not find association between the (-1082A/G) polymorphism and liver fibrosis aggressiveness or cirrhosis in the CHC patients.15 Conversely, some authors demonstrated that the IL-10 (-1082) AA genotype was associated with an increased risk of chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis, while IL-10 (-1082) AG genotype was associated with a reduced risk. They also reported that IL-10 (-1082) GG genotype with high IL10 production was associated with lower risk of progression to cirrhosis due to potent anti-inflammatory and modulatory effect of IL10 on hepatic fibrogenesis.9 Regarding CHC group, no significant differences were found regarding the laboratory data, including ALT, AST and viral load between IL-10 (-1082 A/G) genotypes and alleles. However, some investigators found that IL-10 (-1082) AA and -1082 A were associated with an increased risk of HCV RNA replication, while IL-10 (-1082) AG and -1082 G were associated with a reduced risk.21
A study analysis of the role of allelic or genotype variations of IL-10 and its association with hepatocellular injury, as tested by ALT, reported that there was no significant difference in the IL-10 (-1082) genotype profile between patients with normal and patients with elevated ALT levels.22 In the present study, CHC patients showed significantly higher FIB4 than SVC subjects. It was reported that the mean HAI and fibrosis scores of the PCR negative women were also significantly lower than those of PCR positive women (p=0.000).23 Also, the present study showed that CHC patients had significantly lower PLC than SVC subjects. This could be explained by the presence of hypersplenism, decreased platelet production due to decreased hepatic thrombopoietin (TPO) secretion and CHC induced bone marrow suppression.24 Logistic regression analysis for prediction of SVC using gender, BMI, N/L ratio, INR, AST, ALT, FIB4 and IL10 genotypes and alleles, as covariates, showed that lower ALT, AST and FIB4 were associated with SVC in univariable analysis.
On multivariate analysis, only lower FIB4 was considered a predictor of SVC. A study revealed that SVC tended to be high in patients with high ALT levels which could be a reflection of the immune response to acute HCV infection. However, there was no correlation between SVC and serum AST.25 However, another study did not find an association between SVC and ALT level. Lack of association with these factors could be related to the lack of exact date of high-risk exposure to infection.26 A third study found no association of SVC with age, sex, race & peak ALT level.27 The limitation of the present study was the small sample size. Also, serum level of IL-10 was not measured in the different genotypes of the IL-10 gene. Large scale studies in other areas of Egypt are needed to confirm our result. Also, the concurrent determination of the serum level of IL10 and estimation of its expression pattern is needed. Studying of other IL10 SNPs (-819 T/C; -592 A/C) and exploring their role in predicting SVC should be done. Studying of other cytokine gene polymorphisms especially the IL-28B, IL-4(+33); TNF-α (−238 G/A and −308 G/A), IL-4 (+33C/T) & IFN-γ (+874 T/A), is needed to explore their role in predicting SVC of HCV infection.
Single nucleotide polymorphism of the promoter region of the IL-10 gene, 1082 (G/A; rs1800896), did not show significant association with the spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus infection in Egyptian patients. In chronic hepatitis C patients, this SNP had no significant association with the serum HCV viral load, CTP class, PLC or FIB4 score. FIB4 score may predict the SVC of HCV infection
None.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
©2023 Waly, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.