Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2373-6372

Gastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access

Case Series Volume 13 Issue 5

Autoimmunity to extracellular matrix in inflammatory bowel disease: antibody to intestinal epithelial basement membrane and renal tubules in severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease

Konovich EA, Khalif IL, Shapina MV, Sukhina MA

National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Russia

Correspondence: Konovich EA, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russian

Received: August 22, 2022 | Published: September 30, 2022

Citation: Konovich EA, Khalif IL, Shapina MV, et al. Autoimmunity to extracellular matrix in inflammatory bowel disease: antibody to intestinal epithelial basement membrane and renal tubules in severe ulcerative colitis and crohn disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol Open Access. 2022;13(5):175-181. DOI: 10.15406/ghoa.2022.13.00519

Download PDF

Abstract

Introduction (Background): Inflammation is accompanied by degradation and remodelling of extracellular matrix (ECM). Autoimmunity to the components of ECM, which develops at the same time, contributes to the intensification of inflammatory lesions.

Objective (Aim): To determine antibodies to ECM in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD).

Methods: Sera from 79 patients (UC-47 and CD-32) and 15 donors (controls) were examined by indirect immunofluorescence on monkey intestinal and kidney sections (Euroimmun, GERMANY).

Results: The frequency of IgG antibodies in UC, CD patients and controls was: 13/37 (35.1%), 10/28 (35.7%), 1/10 (10%) (p<0.05), and 16/43 (37.2%) (p<0.05), 2/16 (12.5%), 1/15 (6.6%) for intestinal mucosal ECM including epithelial basal membrane zone (EBM), renal tubules BM respectively; in UC patients with moderate to severe endoscopic activity antibodies were detected to intestinal EBM in 4/18 (22.2%) and 9/19 (47.3%) (p=0.05) cases and to renal tubular BM in 4/18 (22.2%) and 12/23 (52.1%) cases (p<0.05). In drug-resistant and drug-sensitive UC patients, antibodies to renal tubular BM were detected in 15/24 (62.5%) and 1/19 (5.2%) (p<0.05) cases, respectively. The number of immunopositive renal tubules increased significantly in reactions with sera from UC patients with severe versus moderate clinical (22.6% and 8.8%) and endoscopic (27.1% and 7.5%) activity and resistant versus sensitive patients to drug therapy (27.5% and 4.7%) ( all p<0.05). Antibodies to EBM were detected more frequently in CD patients with active intestinal inflammation (10/20) and strictures (8/10) than without (2/10, p<0.05). No antibodies were detected in CD patients with endoscopic remission (0/8), including those with strictures (0/5).

Conclusion: Antibodies to ECM structures (intestinal EBM and renal tubule EBM) in UC patients are significantly associated with severe colorectal inflammation and resistance to drug therapy. In CD, antibodies to EBM are present in patients with active intestinal inflammation combined with intestinal strictures.

Keywords: ulcerative colitis, crohn's disease, antibodies, extracellular matrix, epithelial basal membrane, intestinal strictures

Abbreviations

UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, crohn's disease; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; EBM, epithelial basal membrane; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline

Introduction

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are the major clinical forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD develops in clinically immunocompetent individuals, has a chronic continuous or recurrent course, and presents with symptoms mediated by aggressive noninfectious inflammation. Total colorectal involvement is characterized by the presence of marked clinical, endoscopic and morphological signs with the development in some patients of resistance to anti-inflammatory chemo- and biological therapy and life-threatening complications, which dictate the need for surgical removal of the colon with subsequent significant reduction in quality of life. The pathogenesis of IBD includes a complex of pathogenic mechanisms, among which, according to most researchers, the loss of immune tolerance to obligate intestinal microflora is central. Multiple susceptibility genes, especially those responsible for defects in innate immunity in interaction with microflora pathogens, with the participation of environmental factors cause dysregulation of the immune system, leading to activation of cells and mediators of intestinal inflammation.1,2

Extraintestinal immune-mediated manifestations of various localizations, including liver, joints, skin, eyes, and other organs are observed in 20-40% of IBD patients. Primary cytokine dysregulation and autoimmune mechanisms are considered to be independent or contributing factors in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases accompanying IBD.3-6 Studies of susceptibility genes of IBD and IBD-associated primary sclerosing cholangitis and ankylosing spondylitis show the presence of multiple overlapping loci, which determine the formation of common pathways of immunopathogenesis.7

The extracellular matrix (ECM) forms the basis of the interstitial connective tissue, which supports the intraorganic architecture. The epithelial basal membrane (EBM) is a specialized form of the ECM that separates the epithelium from the surrounding stroma. ECM is a platform for cells, regulates intercellular contacts, cell proliferation, differentiation and migration, and performs signaling and transport functions.8

During inflammation there is a significant degradation of ECM, which is accompanied by the expression of new antigenic determinants.9. Antibodies to collagens and other ECM components are detected in patients with inflammatory diseases of various localizations.9–18 The presence of autoantibodies to ECM contributes to the aggravation of the underlying lesion and the development of inflammation in distant organs with more severe manifestations of disease.11,13-16,1820

Destruction of ECM in inflammatory bowel diseases is due to significant expression of proteases that cause proteolysis of ECM and BM structural proteins and, as a consequence, an increase in epithelial and endothelial permeability and migration of immune cells into the mucosa.9 Destruction of ECM or, on the contrary, its excessive production and fibrous tissue mass increase are considered as morphological equivalents of penetrating and stricturizing types of CD, respectively.21 In UC, the production of collagen IV in the EBM of crypts and vascular endothelium BM and collagen V in mucosal ECM is increased.22 In the blood of UC and CD patients the level of markers of ECM components degradation (elastin, collagen V, vimentin) increases.23 In UC patients antibodies to collagens IV and I are revealed.24–26

CD and UC are observed in patients with autoimmune dermatoses that are mediated by autoantibodies to collagen types VII and XVII and other antigens of BM.27–29

Prolonged treatment with corticosteroids is usually associated with the development of resistant and dependent forms with a more aggressive and difficult to manage course.30 Many studies are aimed at finding available markers of inflammatory activity in the colon and predictors of response to drug and biological therapy.31,32 The above data suggest that involvement of ECM in the pathological process, accompanied by immunization of its components, contributes to severe colorectal damage and severe course of UC and CD.

Therefore, in the present study, we determined circulating antibodies to the intestinal and renal ECM of monkeys in UC and CD patients. Identified antibodies to the intestinal and renal tubular ECM area were analyzed in UC patients with moderate and severe clinical and endoscopic activity and resistant to drug therapy and in CD patients with intestinal strictures.

Patients and methods

Patients

In the study we used serum of venous blood of 79 patients with IBD (UC-47 and CD-32), who were examined and treated at the department of inflammatory and functional diseases of the colon at State Scientific Center of Coloproctology named after A.N. Ryzhikh in Moscow (Russia). The diagnosis was made on the basis of clinical, endoscopic, radiological and ultrasound data and morphological examination of small and large intestine mucosa biopsy specimens.33 Age of UC patients was 35.5±1.7 (17-67) years. There were 25 men and 22 women. Mild form of disease was observed in 1 patient, moderate - in 16 patients, and severe - in 30 patients (fulminant - in 4 of them). Total involvement of the large intestine was diagnosed in 39 cases, left-sided colitis - in 6, proctosigmoiditis - in 2. Acute course of the disease was observed in 8 patients, chronic recurrent - in 14, chronic continuous - in 25 patients. Endoscopic activity of UC was determined by the severity of erosive-ulcerous lesions of mucosa.34 Minimal activity is characterized by the signs of mucous membrane inflammation: hyperemia, edema, friability, disorder of vascular pattern, minimal bleeding. Moderate activity is manifested by intensification of the above mentioned signs of inflammation with the presence of erosions and individual ulcers less than 5mm in size. At high activity there are multiple ulcers over 5mm in size, which merge and form extensive ulcerous defects. Minimal, moderate and severe endoscopic activity was revealed in 3, 21 and 23 patients, respectively. Hormone resistant form was observed in 14 patients, hormone dependent - in 8 patients. Toxic dilatation of the large intestine was observed in 4 patients, perforation of the ascending colon and bleeding from the large intestine - in 1 patient, pseudopolyposis - in 4 patients. Due to ineffectiveness of anti-inflammatory drug therapy 24 patients underwent colectomy for surgical treatment.

Age of CD patients was 31,4±2,1 (19-48)years. There were 21 women and 11 men. Colitis was observed in 16 patients, ileocolitis - in 12, terminal ileitis - in 4 patients. Total involvement of the large intestine was found in 16 patients, involvement of the left and right parts of the colon - in 5 and 3 patients respectively, proctosigmoiditis - in 4 patients. Active inflammatory process in the intestine was diagnosed in 24 patients, endoscopic remission - in 8 patients. Intestinal strictures were observed in 15 patients. Perianal complications (fistulas of rectum, fissure” anal canal) were found in 17 patients. Surgical treatment to remove the affected parts of the large intestine was performed in 9 patients.Blood serum of 15 healthy donors was examined as a control group.

Indirect immunofluorescence

Serum samples were stored before the study at -70ºC. The cryostat sections of intestines and kidneys of monkeys (Euroimmun kits, GERMANY) were incubated with 25µl of serum diluted 1:20 for 30min at room temperature. The sections were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5 min and incubated with 20μl fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-human IgG antibodies (FITC-conjugated goat anti-human IgG) for 30min. After washing the section with PBS, the incubating medium (50% glycerol-PBS) and a coverslip were applied. Sera from a patient with Goodpasture's syndrome (antibodies to the kidney glomeruli) and a healthy person were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The sections were examined using fluorescence microscopy (Jenalumar, Germany). 100 or more renal tubules were visualized on the kidney sections. The result was expressed as % of tubules with linear continuous fluorescence BM. Sera were considered seropositive if the number of immunoreactive tubules was higher than the cut-off (M±2σ) number in the control group, which was 15.0%.

Statistical analysis

Significance of differences in the proportions of patients with the presence of antibodies in the compared groups was performed using Fisher's exact test. Mann-Whitney U-criterion was used to compare the number of immunopositive renal tubules. Differences were considered significant at significance level p<0.05. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative diagnostic value of antibodies to renal tubules for detection of resistance to drug therapy in UC patients were determined. Statistica 10 software (Stat Soft Inc., USA) was used for data processing.

Results

On sections of monkey intestine sera from UC and CD patients showed ECM luminescence of the lamina propria of the mucosa with spreading to the EBM zone of the villi and crypts (Figure 1A&B). Linear continuous fluorescence of renal tubule BM was observed on renal sections (Figure 1D). Antibodies to the EBM zone of the bowel were present in one-third of UC and CD patients. Antibodies to the renal tubule BM were also detected in a third of UC patients. In CD patients their frequency did not increase compared to the control group (Table 1).

Figure 1 Indirect immunofluorescence on monkey intestinal and kidney sections with patient sera and fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-human IgG antibodies (FITC-conjugated goat anti-human IgG). Positive serum reaction of a patient with ulcerative colitis with ECM and EBM zone of the crypt in the intestinal mucosa plate (A) and with renal tubule BM (C). Positive serum reaction of a Crohn's disease patient with ECM and EBM zone in the villous mucosa (B). Negative reaction of donor serum (control) with mucosal crypt (D) and renal tubules (E). A,B,D - 660 x; c,e - 330 x.

 Clinical groups

 Number of patients with antibodies/Number of patients in the group, abs (%)
 Intestinal EBM Renal tubule EBM

Ulcerative colitis

 13/37 (35,1)* 16/43 (37,2)***

Crohn's disease

 10/28 (35,7)* 2/16 (12,5)

Control group

 1/10 (10,0) 1/15 ( 6,6)

Table 1 Frequency of detection of serum antibodies to intestinal EBM area and renal tubule BM of the monkey in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease
*- p<0.05 - ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease vs (vs) control group; ** - p<0.05 - ulcerative colitis vs Crohn's disease;

Antibodies to intestinal EBM area in UC patients were detected twice as often in severe versus moderate endoscopic activity. In the groups of patients with moderate and severe clinical activity and with and without the effect of drug therapy, antibodies were detected with equal frequency (Table 2). The number of UC patients with moderate clinical and endoscopic activity with the presence of antibodies to renal tubular BM increased threefold compared to the control group, but the differences did not reach the level of statistical significance. The number of seropositive patients with severe clinical and endoscopic activity and resistant to drug therapy, as well as the number of renal tubules with which the sera of the patients of these groups reacted, significantly increased relative to the corresponding comparison and control groups (Table 3). The sensitivity and specificity of antibodies to renal tubule BM for detection of resistance to drug therapy were 62.5% and 94.7%, respectively. The positive diagnostic value was 93.7% and the negative diagnostic value was 66.6%.

Clinical groups

The number of patients with the presence of antibodies/the number of patients in the group, abs (%)

Clinical activity:
moderate

Severe

4/11 (36,3)

9/26 (34,6)*

Endoscopic activity: moderate

Severe

 

4/18 (22,2)**

9/19 (47,3) *

With the effect of drug therapy

Without the effect of drug therapy

No drug effect

therapy

 

6/16 (37.5)*

7/21 (33,3)

Control group

 

1/10 (10,0)

Table 2 Frequency of detection of antibodies to the EBM zone of monkey intestine in patients with ulcerative colitis depending on clinical and endoscopic activity and resistance to drug therapy
*- p <0.05 - groups with severe clinical and endoscopic activity and without the effect of drug therapy versus (vs) the control group; **-p = 0.05 - between groups with moderate and severe endoscopic activity

 

Clinical groups

Number of patients with antibodies/number of patients
of patients in the group, abs (%)

Number of immunopositive tubules
M (min-max)%

Clinical activity :Moderate

Severe

3/13 (23,0)

13/29 (44,8)*

 

8,8 (0-38)

22,6 (0-95)* **

Endoscopic activity: Moderate

Severe

4/18 (22,2)

12/23 (52,1)* **

7,5 (0-38)

27,1 (0-95)* **

With the effect of
medication
therapy

Without the effect of drug therapy

1/19 (5,2)

 

15/24 (62,5)* **

4,7 (0-21,8)

 

27,5 (0-95)* **

Control group

1/15 (6,6)

5,0 (0-15,5)

Table 3 Frequency of detection of serum antibodies to BM of monkey kidney tubules and the number of immunopositive tubules depending on clinical and endoscopic activity and resistance to drug therapy of patients with ulcerative colitis
* P <0.05 - groups with severe clinical and endoscopic activity and no effect of drug therapy vs control group
** P<0.05 - groups with severe vs. moderate clinical and endoscopic activity and groups without effect vs. with effect of drug therapy

In half of CD patients with active intestinal inflammation, antibodies to monkey intestinal EBM zone were detected.

Their frequency in patients with active inflammation and intestinal strictures was significantly higher than in patients without strictures. No antibodies were detected in patients with endoscopic remission, regardless of the presence of strictures (Table 4). 

Clinical groups

Number of patients with antibodies /
Number of patients in the group, abs (%)

 

Crohn's disease:

With active inflammation
In the intestine:

a) with the presence of strictures

b) without strictures

 

With endoscopic
remission:

a) with the presence of strictures
b) without strictures

 

10/28 (35,7)*

 

10/20 (50)**

8/10***

2/10

 

0/8

0/5

0/3

Control group

1/10

Table 4 Frequency of detection of serum antibodies to monkey intestinal EBM area in Crohn's disease patients with the presence of intestinal strictures
* p<0.05- Crohn's disease versus control group;
** p<0.05- active intestinal inflammation versus endoscopic remission;
*** p<0.05- active intestinal inflammation with and without strictures;

Discussion

Our studies have shown that circulating antibodies to monkey intestinal mucosal ECM, predominantly to the EBM zone, are present in one third of UC and CD patients. In UC patients, antibodies to monkey renal tubule BM are detected with similar frequency. The affected colonic mucosa is a source of immunizing autoantigens and, most likely, the sera of UC patients reveal common antigenic determinants in the EBM of the colon and the BM of the renal tubules. The frequency of antibodies to renal tubules is not increased in CD patients compared with controls. These data suggest differences in the spectrum of immunizing colonic autoantigens in UC and CD, which is confirmed by a significant difference in IgG subclasses in the humoral immune response in UC and CD patients.2,35,36  

Autoantibodies to BM components, particularly collagen and laminin, are major pathogens in a number of autoimmune diseases of the kidneys, skin, joints, lungs, and other tissues.27,3739

Collagen IV is also present in EBM of the digestive tract, including the colon.40 Schmehl et al found a significant increase in the expression of collagen IV in the EBM of crypts and endothelial BM and collagen V in the ECM as the activity of inflammation increases.22 In an earlier study, we detected circulating antibodies to collagen IV in ELISA in 43.5% of UC patients and 16.6% of BC patients.24 The level of antibodies was higher in patients with severe resistant UC, which is confirmed in the present study that identified ECM as a target of autoantibodies.

The role of ECM components as autoantigens is consistent with the development of UC and CD in patients with autoimmune bullous dermatoses (autoimmune blistering diseases), which are mediated by autoantibodies to the BM of the squamous epithelium.27–29,44 In particular, CD is observed in patients with acquired bullous epidermolysis (epidermolysis bullosa acquisita-EBA), which is associated with antibodies to collagen VII in epidermal BM and colonic EBM.27–29,41,42.

In experimental EBA induced by administration of collagen VII to mice, skin, upper digestive tract and intestine lesions were observed in 100%, 60% and 30% of individuals, respectively.43

Local immune complexes in the colon wall of UC patients with severe inflammation and with extraintestinal manifestations, containing IgG1 and activated complement components, were found in studies performed in the 70-90s. The twentieth century.4549

In separate studies, IgG antibodies to cytoskeleton proteins and EBM crypts adjacent to mucosal ulcers were isolated from the tissue of the affected colon.5055  Inflammation is accompanied by an increase in the content of normal ECM components and their degraded fragments, the formation of an excess of modified peptides and the demasking of latent epitopes with new immunogenic determinants capable of causing an autoimmune response, which contributes to the maintenance and aggravation of the initial inflammation.9,56 In previous studies, we found that antigens localized in the EBM and the vascular wall of the mucosa of the normal colon, in UC, in addition to these structures are present in the intercellular fluid, which is accompanied by the formation of antibodies.57,58

We have previously determined that polyclonal immune rabbit antibodies prepared by immunization with mucosal supernatants from the colon of UC patients localized in indirect immunofluorescence EBM crypts and the vascular wall on sections of the affected colon and on sections of intact colon resected from cancer patients. By immunodiffusion in agar, the antigens were detected in the colon supernatants of UC patients, but were not detected in the supernatants of intact colon. We concluded that in destructive inflammation, antigens localized in the mucosal EBM accumulate in the interstitial fluid of the ECM and may be accessible to the cells of the immune system.57,58 Degradation of EBM is confirmed by a significant imbalance in the content of many proteins in the study of colonic mucosal proteome of UC patients.59 Changes in ECM composition and disruption of its three-dimensional structure lead to loss of connection of colonocytes and matrix, decreased migration, differentiation and regeneration of epithelial cells with subsequent destruction of crypts and formation of mucosal ulcers.22

In the present study, we found that the level of antibodies to intestinal EBM and renal tubule BM significantly increased in UC patients with severe endoscopic activity. Sera from these patients stained significantly more renal tubules on kidney section than sera from patients with moderate endoscopic activity and the control group. Thus, antibodies to ECM antigens are evidence of severe mucosal damage and, a possible pathogenic mechanism that enhances the initial inflammation in the colon.

Severe UC is associated with resistance to drug therapy.30 In a previous study in subgroups with a limited number of UC patients, we determined moderate sensitivity and high specificity of antibodies to renal tubular BM in drug-resistant patients.60 In the present work, the positive diagnostic value of this test is 94.7%. An extended prospective study is necessary to determine the predictive value of antibodies.

One of the severe manifestations of CD is the formation of intestinal strictures. Strictures develop due to excessive production of ECM by activated mesenchymal cells under the influence of multiple inflammatory mediators.61 The expression of collagens III and V is significantly increased in the intestinal wall.62 The development of strictures is combined with other syndromes caused by mutations of connective tissue protein genes, leading to the lesion of fibrogenesis and its mechanical properties.6368 High joint mobility is observed in 70% of CD patients, which is the main symptom of a number of hereditary hypermobility syndromes.63 These syndromes are based on mutations in collagen V and tenascin-X genes, which cause disorders of fibrogenesis and mechanical properties of connective tissue.6466 In CD patients with intestinal strictures, tenascin expression in small and large intestine submucosa and its level in blood are increased.67,68 In the present study, antibodies to intestinal EBM area in CD patients are detected significantly more often in active intestinal inflammation with strictures than in their absence. In contrast, antibodies are undetectable in patients in endoscopic remission, regardless of the presence of strictures. These data indicate that active intestinal inflammation is an initiating factor for the production of antibodies to EBM when the fibrous tissue mass of the strictures increases. A study of experimental models of inflammation-induced fibrosis reveals different kinetics of inflammatory and fibrogenic molecules and the subsequent development of fibrosis independent of inflammation.61,69 The absence of active intestinal inflammation leads to decreased immunization with ECM components.

Antibodies to collagens and other ECM components are detected in 20%-80% of patients with various inflammatory diseases, including arthritis, viral hepatitis, systemic vasculitis, autoimmune thyroiditis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, periodontitis and others.918 Autoantibodies to ECM components, while not the primary pathogenic factor of these autoimmune and nonautoimmune inflammatory diseases, amplify the lesion in the diseased organ and may cause damage to distant organs and tissues.11,1316,1820

In support of this, we show that antibodies to ECM are detected in UC patients with severe resistant inflammation of the colon and in CD patients complicated by intestinal strictures.

Since ECM is a nonspecific structural basis of various organs, the study of its immunopathology seems promising in the search for common pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation and extraintestinal lesions in IBD.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in this study, we show that one-third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease show circulating IgG antibodies to ECM structures, including the EBM area of the bowel in UC and CD and the renal tubule BM in UC. In UC patients, antibodies to renal tubule BM are associated with severe clinical and endoscopic activity and resistance to drug therapy. In CD, antibodies to intestinal EBM are detected in patients with active inflammation combined with intestinal strictures.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

Author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Kaser A, Zeissing S, Blumberg RS. Inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Rev Immunol. 2010;28:573–621.
  2.  De Souzal HSP, Fiocci C. Immunopathogenesis of IBD: current state of the art. Nature Reviews Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(1):13–27.
  3. Ardizzone S, Puttini PS, Cassinotti A, et al. Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2008;40S:S253–S259.
  4.  Isene R, Bernklev T, Hoie O, et al. On Behalf of THEEC–IBD Study Group. Extraintestinal manifestations in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis:results from a prospective, population–based European inception cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(3):300–305.
  5. Smith JA. Update on ankylosing spondylitis: current concepts in pathogenesis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15:489–497.
  6. Brown SR, Coviello LC. Extraintestinal manifestations associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95:1245–1259.
  7. Sommeren SV, Janse M, Karjalainen J, et al. Extraintestinal manifestations and complications in inflammatory bowel disease: from shared genetics to shared biological pathways. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(6): 987–994.
  8. Bonnans C, Chou J Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2014;15:786–801.
  9. Bei R, Masuelli L, Palumbo C, et al. Long–lasting tissue inflammatory processes trigger autoimmune responses to extracellular matrix molecules. International Reviews of Immunology. 2008;27:137–175.
  10. Choi E KK, Gatenby PA, Mc Gill NW, et al. Autoantibodies to type II collagen: occurrence in rheumatoid arthritis, other arthritides, autoimmune connective tissue diseases and chronic inflammatory syndromes. Ann Rheum Dis. 1988;47:313–322.
  11. Borg B, Seetharam A, Subramanian V, et al. Immune response to extracellular matrix collagen in chronic hepatitis C induced. Liver fibrosis. liver Transpl. 2011;17:814–823.
  12. Direskeneli H, D’Cruz D, Khamashta MA, et al. Autoantibodies against endothelial cells, extracellular matrix, and human collagen type IV inpatients with systemic vasculitis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol.1994;70:206–210.
  13. Bei R, Mentuccia D, Trono P, et al. Immunity to extracellular matrix antigens is associated with ultrastructural alterations of the stroma and stratified epithelium basement membrane in the skin of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis patients. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol.2006;19:661–674.
  14. Gopinath B, Musselman R, Adams CL, et al. Study of serum antibodies against three eye muscle antigens and the connective tissue antigen collagen XIII in patients with Graves’ disease with and without ophthalmopathy: correlation with clinical features. Thyroid. 2006;16:967–974.
  15. Daffa NI, Tighe PJ, Corne JM, et al. Natural and disease–specific autoantibodies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2014;180:155–163.
  16. Liu M, Subramanian V, Hhristie C, et al. Immune responses to self–antigens in asthma patients: Clinical and immuno–pathological implications. Hum Immunol. 2012;73:511–516.
  17. Vittal R, Mickler EA, Fisher AJ, et al. Type V Collagen Induced Tolerance Suppresses Collagen Deposition, TGF–b and Associated Transcripts in Pulmonary Fibrosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76451.
  18. Koutouzis Th, Haber D, Shaddox L, et al. Autoreactivity of Serum Immunoglobulin to Periodontal Tissue Components: A Pilot Study. J Periodontol. 2009;80(4):625–633.
  19. Rizzo P , Pitocco D, Zaccardi F, et al. Autoantibodies to Post–Translationally Modified Type I and II Collagen in Charcot Neuroarthropathy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017;33(2).
  20. Manivel V, Sohrabian A , Wick M, et al. Anti–type II collagen immune complex–induced granulocyte reactivity is associated with joint erosions in RA patients with anti–collage anntibodies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):8.
  21. Shimshoni E, Yablecovitch D, Baram L,et al. ECM remodelling in IBD: innocent bystander or partner in crime? The emerging role of extracellular molecular events in sustaining intestinal inflammation. Gut. 2015;64:367–372.
  22. Schmehl K, Florian S, Jacobasch G, et al. Deficiency of epithelial basement membrane laminin in ulcerative colitis affected human colonic mucosa. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15(1):39˗48.
  23. Mortensen JH, Manon–Jensen T, Jensen MD, et al. Ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and irritable bowel syndrome have different profiles of extracellular matrix turnover, which also reflects disease activity in Crohn's disease. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185855.
  24. Konovich EA. Antibodies to glomerular basement membrane in ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory bowel disease–Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies. Russia: Falk sympos 154 Moscow. 2006.
  25. Abdulganieva D, Mukhametova D, Zinkevich O, et al. Autoimmunity against type IV collagen in ulcerative colitis. J Crohn s and Colitis. 2019;13(Suppl 1):S122˗S122. P074.
  26.  Mukhametova D, Abdulganieva D, Zinkevich O, et al. Autoimmunity against type I collagen in ulcerative colitis. Amer J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:S15˗S15.P056.
  27. Hundorfean G, Neurath M, Sitaru C. Autoimmunity against type VII collagen in inflammatory bowel disease. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;10:2393˗2403.
  28. Shipman A, Reddy H, Wojnarowska F. Association between the subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases linear IgA disease and the pemphigoid group and inflammatory bowel disease: two case reports and literature review. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 2012;37:461–468.
  29. Reddy H, Shipman A, Wojnarowska F. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the literature. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 2013;38(3):225–230.
  30. Faubion W A, Loftus E V, Harmsen W S, et al. The Natural History of Corticosteroid Therapy for Inßammatory Bowel Disease: A Population–Based Study. Gastroenterol. 2001;121(2):255–260.
  31. Sands B E. Biomarkers of Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(5)1275˗ 1285.
  32. Stevens TW, Matheeuwsen M, Lönnkvist MH, et al. Systematic review: predictive biomarkers of therapeutic response in inflammatory bowel disease—Personalised medicine in its infancy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 48(11–12):1213˗1231.
  33. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, et al. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut. 2006;55(6):749–53.
  34. Veselov VV. Endoscopic diagnostics of nonspecific inflammatory bowel diseases. In: Nonspecific inflammatory bowel diseases. Ed Vorobyov GI, Khalif IL. Moscow: Miclosh; 2008. p. 190–194.
  35. Scott MG,  Nahm MH, Macke Ket al.Spontaneous secretion of IgG subclasses by intestinal mononuclear cells: differences between ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and controls. Clin Exp Immunol.1986;66(1):209–215.
  36. Mow WS,  Vasiliauskas EA Lin Y–Ch, et al. Association of antibody responses to microbial antigens and complications of small bowel Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(2):414–424.
  37. Foster MH. Basement Membranes and Autoimmune Diseases. Matrix Biol. 2017;57˗58:149–168.
  38. Florea F, Koch M, Hashimoto T, et al. Autoimmunity against laminins. Clinical Immunology. 2016;170:39˗52.
  39. Kalluri R, Wilson CB, Weber M. Identification of the alpha3(IV) chain of type IV collagen as the common autoantigen in anti–basement membrane disease and Goodpasture syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6(4):1178–1185.
  40. Sato H, Naito IMomota R, et al. The differential distribution of type IV collagen alpha chains in the subepithelial basement membrane of the human alimentary canal. Arch Histol Cytol. 2007;70(5):313–323. 
  41. Chen M, O'Toole EA, Sanghavi J, et al. The Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita Antigen (Type VII Collagen) is Present in Human Colon and Patients with Crohn's Disease have Autoantibodies to Type VII Collagen. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118(6):1059–1064.
  42. Licarete E, Ganz S, Recknagel MJ, et al. Prevalence of collagen VII–specific autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. BMC Immunology. 2012;13:16.
  43. Ishii N, Recke A, Mihai S, et al. Autoantibody–induced intestinal inflammation and weight loss in experimental epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J Pathol. 2011;224(2):234–244.
  44. Paige DG, Leonard JN, Wojnarowska F, et al. Linear IgA disease and ulcerative colitis. Br J Dermatol. 1997;136:779–782.
  45. Gebbers JO, Otto HF. Evidence for local immune complexes in ulcerative colitis. Acta gastroenterol Belg. 1978; 41:329–350.
  46. Konovich E, Kirkin B, Khalif I. IgG, IgM, IgA, secretory IgA and complement C3, C4 and C9 in the colon with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 1987;(1):71–75.
  47. Halstensen TS, Mollnes TE, Garred P, et al. Epithelial deposition of immunoglobulin G1 and activated complement (C3b and terminal complement complex) in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1990;98(5):1264–1271.
  48. Ueki T, Mizuno M, Uesu T, et al. Distribution of activated complement, C3b, and its degraded fragments, iC3b/C3dg, in the colonic mucosa of ulcerative colitis (UC). Clin Exp Immunol. 1996;104:286–292.
  49. Halstensen TS,  Mollnes TE, Brandtzaeg P. Persistent complement activation in submucosal blood vessels of active inflammatory bowel disease: immunohistochemical evidence. Gastroenterology. 1989;97(1):10-19.
  50. Das KM, Dubin R, Nagai T. Isolation and characterization of colonic tissue–bound antibodies from patients with idiopathic ulcerative colitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75:4528–4532.
  51. Das KM, Dasgupta A, Manda lA, et al. Autoimmunity to cytoskeletal protein tropomyosin. A clue to the pathogenetic mechanism for ulcerative colitis. J Immunol. 1993;150:2487–2493.
  52. Khoo UY, Bjarnason I, Donaghy A, et al. Antibodies to colon epithelial cells from the serum and colonic mucosal washings in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1995;37:63–70.
  53. Snook JA, Lowes JR, Wu KC, et al. Serum and tissue autoantibodies to colonic epithelium in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1991;32:163–166.
  54. Shadrin BP, Konovich EA, Khalif I.L. Fixed immunoglobulins in ulcerative colitis. Soviet Medicine. 1983;5:43–46.
  55. Meijer MJ, Mieremet–Ooms MA, van der Zon AM, et al. Increased mucosal matrix metalloproteinase–1, –2, –3 and –9 activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and the relation with Crohn’s disease phenotype. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:733–739.
  56. Adair–Kirk TL, Senior RM. Fragments of extracellular matrix as mediators of inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40(6–7):1101–1110.
  57. Konovich EA, Khalif IL, Kirkin BV. Rabbit antibodies to colonic mucosa from patients with ulcerative colitis react with epithelial basement membrane and mucosal vessels. IBD–pathophysiol. as basis of treatment. Germany: Falk sympos N 67;1993. p. 493.
  58. Konovich EA, Khalif IL, Kirkin BV. Immunoreactivity of the epithelial basement membrane and vessels of the colon in ulcerative colitis: an immunohistological study. Immunology. 1995;6:51–53.
  59. Kirov S, Sasson A, Zhang C, et al. Degradation of the extracellular matrix is part of the pathology of ulcerative colitis. Mol Omics. 2019;15:67–76.
  60. Konovich EA, Khalif IL. A method for predicting the inefficiency of conservative treatment of ulcerative colitis. Patent N 2501010. 2013.
  61.  Rieder F, Fiocchi C, Rogler G. Mechanisms, Management, and Treatment of Fibrosis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology . 2017;152(2):340–350.
  62. Burke JP, Mulsow JJ, O’Keane C, et al. Fibrogenesis in Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterol. 2007;102(2):439–448.
  63. Vounotrypidis P, Efremidou E, Zezos P, et al. Prevalence of Joint Hypermobility and Patterns of Articular Manifestations in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:924138.
  64. Malfait F, Wenstrup RJ, De Paepe A. Clinical and genetic aspects of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, classic type. Genetics in Medicine. 2010;12:597–605.
  65. Hakim AJ, Sahota A. Joint hypermobility and skin elasticity: the hereditary disorders of connective tissue. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(6):521–533.
  66. Zweers MC, Hakim AJ, Grahame R, et al. Joint Hypermobility Syndromes. The Pathophysiologic Role of Tenascin–X Gene Defects. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2004;50(9):2742–2749.
  67. Erdem E, Kochan K, Paker N, et al. The correlation between tenascin–C expression, and formation of intestinal stricture. North Clin Istanbul. 2014;1(3):127–131.
  68. Geboes K, El–Zine MY, Dalle I, et al. Tenascin and Strictures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Immunohistochemical Study. Int J Surg Pathol. 2001;9(4):281–286.
  69. Wu F, Chakravarti S. Differential expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic genes and their regulation by NF–kappa B inhibition in a mouse model of chronic colitis. JImmunol. 2007;179(10):6988–7000.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2022 Konovich, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.

Citations