Review Article Volume 2 Issue 5
1Department of Gastroenterology, University of Pernambuco School of Medicine, Pernambuco, Brazil
2Pernambuco Liver Institute, Brazil
3Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, USA
Correspondence: Erika Rabelo F Siqueira, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Pernambuco School of Medicine, Pernambuco, Brazil
Received: November 18, 2014 | Published: September 24, 2015
Citation: Siqueira ERF, Sanyal AJ (2015) A Review of Pharmacological Treatments of NASH. Gastroenterol Hepatol Open Access 2(5):00058. DOI: 10.15406/ghoa.2015.02.00058
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses the entire spectrum of fatty liver disease in individuals without significant alcohol consumption and affects up to a third of the population in many developed countries. Approximately 10-30% of patients with NAFLD will progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is associated with hepatocellular injury and inflammation resulting in progressive liver fibrosis, liver failure and liver cancer. The increase in the number of patients with advanced liver disease secondary to NASH, as well as associated hepatocellular carcinoma, will impact on the potential future demand for Liver Transplantation (LT) and also increase the cardiovascular mortality. Despite these large numbers of pharmacological agents that have been used to treat NASH, none of them have yet been shown to improve clinically meaningful outcomes. Also the long term safety of several agents remain to be established.
Conclusion: In this clinical review, we will briefly review the pharmacological treatment of NASH in the last years due to the increasing incidence of NAFLD and NASH around the world.
NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; LT, liver transplantation; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; IR, insulin resistance; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; LOXL 2, lysyl oxidase-like 2
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is recognize as the most common cause of chronic liver disease, and is estimated to affect 30% of adults and 10% of children in United States.1 NASH is associated with a significant increase in liver-related mortality as well as cardiovascular mortality, progressive liver fibrosis and ultimately cirrhosis.2–10 NASH comes from data obtained from patients with the diagnosis of cryptogenic cirrhosis, which accounts for about 10% of liver transplants. The increase in the number of patients with advanced liver disease secondary to NASH, as well as associated hepatocelullar carcinoma, will impact on the potential future demand for Liver Transplantation (LT).11 Management of patients with NAFLD depends largely on the stage of disease, emphasising the importance of careful risk stratification. All patients with NAFLD require advice about lifestyle modification aimed at weight loss and increased physical activity, as well as treatment of any associated metabolic risk factors (diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia).12 Since the majority of patients suffer from obesity, insulin resistance (IR) and concomitant cardiovascular disease, weight reduction of approximately 10% has been advised by the American Gastroenterological Association.13 Due to the metabolic risk factors that are common to both NAFLD/NASH, cardiovascular disease and progression of disease, therapeutic options in NAFLD and NASH are currently limited mainly to interventions in terms of diet and lifestyle. A medication with long-term effectiveness that would beneficially affect reduce the risk does currently not exist until now. In this clinical review, we will also briefly review the lifestyle modification and the pharmacological treatment of NASH from last years. While a medication with long-term effectiveness that would reduce the risk at liver related outcomes currently does exist, several therapeutics agents appear to look very promising. The used such agents will be discussed (Table 1).
Treatment |
Intervention/Indication |
Target/Outcome |
Lifestyle modification |
Exercise/Diet |
>7% loss of body weight reduces steatosis, ballooning and hepatic inflammation.17 |
Weight loss drugs |
Inhibit enteric lipid absorption |
|
Vitamin E |
Nondiabetic patients with only biopsy-proven NASH |
|
Thiazolidinediones |
Patients with NASH |
Improvement in steatosis and inflammation and reduced fibrosis progression.37,39 |
Statins |
NAFLD patients with dyslipidaemia |
Benefit in terms of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.49 |
Table 1 Summary of management of NAFLD/NASH
Lifestyle modification
Lifestyle changes associated with weight reduction results in the loss of white adipose tissue, which decreases IR. Exercise can also improve muscular insulin sensitivity, which may improve the impact of IR on NAFLD.14,15 Several studies have shown a reduction in transaminases as well as histology-determined steatosis grade and inflammation in patients with NASH who had significant weight loss.16,17 The most effective treatment consists of weight reduction and intensive lifestyle modification with an increase in physical activity/exercise, which has been confirmed to be able to improve histological results.18 Although the optimum exercise to treat NAFLD is not known, studies examining moderate intensity training, high intensity training and resistance exercise have shown improvement in liver enzymes and reduction in liver fat, independent of weight loss, but the effects on histology remain unknown.19,19-21 The best evidence for weight loss as a means to improve liver histology in NASH comes from a trial that randomized 31 obese persons with NASH to intensive lifestyle. The intensive weight loss group improved steatosis, necrosis and inflammation, but not fibrosis. Importantly, participants with more than 7% weight loss had significant improvement in steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning, and NAFLD Activity Score (NAS).17
Weight loss drugs
Orlistat inhibit enteric lipid absorption and has been associated with weight loss. In a recent trial, patients taking orlistat did not benefit from significant weight loss or histological improvement compared with the placebo group. Probably, the improvement was proportional to weight loss and not directly by the use of the drug. Another randomized control study to investigate the effects of orlistat showed that orlistat was safe and well tolerated, although, no histologic changes have been demonstrated. There are no evidence supporting the efficacy of orlistat in patients with NASH.16,22
NASH specific therapies
For patients with biopsy-proven NASH and also are at highest risk of developing progressive liver disease, more aggressive lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy are required.
Vitamin E
The lipotoxicity model in NASH attributes a central role to oxidative stress in the progression of disease in patients with NASH.23The Vitamin E in a large multi-center, randomised controlled trial demonstrating improvements in all histological parameters, except fibrosis score.24-28 In the large PIVENS trial, significantly more patients had improvement in steatohepatitis following 96 weeks of vitamin E 800 IU/day compared with placebo in patients without diabetes (42% vs 19% p<0.001).29 This was confirmed in a study of childhood NASH, where vitamin E was shown to reduce steatohepatitis in a subgroup who had follow-up liver biopsies.30 The vitamin E causes improvement in steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning and resolution of steatohepatitis in adults with NASH, however no effect on hepatic fibrosis. And is also associated with a decrease in aminotransferases in subjects with NASH.17,31 The recent NAFLD guideline recommends Vitamin E as a first-line treatment for nondiabetic patients with only biopsy-proven NASH.32-34 Others agents with antioxidant properties (e.g., N-acetylcysteine, vitamin C, probucol, betaine) have not been shown to be effective in treating NASH.19,35 In addition, an initial open-label studies of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a potential cytoprotective agent in NAFLD, it was not significantly different in terms of liver biochemistries or histology when compared with placebo.19,36
Thiazolidinediones and metformin
A meta-analysis has determined that metformin does not have a beneficial impact on transaminase levels or liver histology, and promising early results are probably attributable to lifestyle intervention in the treatment groups.37,38 Another study concluded that 6-12 months of metformin plus lifestyle intervention did not improve aminotransferases or liver histology, compared with lifestyle intervention alone, independently of metformin dose or the presence of diabetes.37 Several studies investigated the effect of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on aminotransferases and liver histology in adults with NASH. Thiazolidinediones have been trialed showing some improvement in steatosis and inflammation and reduced fibrosis progression.37,39 A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that pioglitazone treatment in NASH significantly improves steatosis, inflammation and to a lesser degree fibrosis.37 Treatment with pioglitazone is associated with weight gain27 and there have been reports of increased risk of congestive cardiac failure,40,41 bladder cancer42 and reduced bone densit.43 In the case of rosiglitazone, increased risk of myocardial infarction.44
GLP-1 analogues
Studies with Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues (such as liraglutide or exenatide) are underway to determine the effect of liraglutide on liver histology. However, there is recent evidence to suggest that GLP-1 agonists might induce pancreatitis (particularly in those with very high triglycerides) and increase the potential for pancreatic cancer. 45
Hypolipidemia drugs
Atherogenic dyslipidemia is related to increased insulin-induced hepatic lipid synthesis in patients with NAFLD and also high–normal level of ALT was associated with higher levels of Low-density lipoproteins(LDL-cholesterol), LDL particle concentration (LDL-P), size, small dense LDL-cholesterol (sdLDL-C), and sdLDL particles (P<.001 for all).46,47 Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is a stronger predictor for NAFLD than total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL. No patients with non-HDL-C < 130 mg/dl developed NAFLD, whereas 20.8% of those with values between 130 to 160 and 24.6% of those with values >160 mg/dl developed NAFLD (p for trend = 0.015).48 Statins are safe to recommend in NAFLD patients with dyslipidaemia. They do confer a benefit in terms of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.16,49 Raised transaminases are frequently seen in patients receiving statins and serious liver injury is rarely seen in clinical practice.16
Angiotensin II receptor blocker
A previous study has shown the use of telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with PPAR-γ-modulating activity, improved transaminase levels and insulin sensitivity, and showed a significant decrease in NASH activity score and fibrosis.50 Another ARB, losartan, induced a significant reduction in serum fibrosis markers and numbers of activated hepatic stellate cell in 48 weeks.51,52 There is no sufficient evidence to support the use of these medications as specific treatments for NAFLD, although the aggressive management of cardiovascular risk factors is recommended.53
Extracts/phytochemicals/polyherbal formulations
Available scientific information and experiments on antiobesity and antidiabetic plant extracts/phytochemicals/polyherbal formulations greatly outnumber the preclinical and clinical studies conducted on NASH so far. Natural products of herbal origin have been extensively reported to prevent hepatic lipid accumulation without exhibiting major side effects. There are insufficient evidence to support the use of Herbal Medicines as treatment for NAFLD/NASH.54 Retrospective studies suggest that coffee consumption may exert beneficial effects in patients with NAFLD. No association was demonstrated between coffee consumption and the new onset of NAFLD, but coffee intake may exert beneficial effects on fibrosis progression.55 Owing to these reasons, determination of toxicity dosage of any herbal preparation through preclinical acute and sub chronic toxicity evaluations becomes necessary.
Omega-3 fatty acids, pentoxifylline and probiotics
Other regimens such as omega-3 fatty acids, pentoxifylline and probiotics have been studied for treatment of NASH30 Fish oil is composed primarily of omega-3 fatty acids, which, along with omega-6 fatty acids, constitute the essential fatty acids. A recent meta-analysis on the use of omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) on NASH showed a beneficial changes in liver fat for those receiving PUFA treatment as well as an observed reduction in AST, but the optimal dose is not currently known 61. Pentoxifylline is considered as anti-TNF compound. Although one study suggested improvement in steatosis, there are lack of histological and laboratory outcomes.56,57 Probiotics have been suggested to be beneficial in NASH by augmenting the microbial environment in the intestine. At present, there are no evidence to support the use of any of these regimens for patients with NASH.58 Omega-3 fatty acids, pentoxifylline, and probiotics cannot be recommended as first-line therapeutic agents to treat NASH.
Anti-fibrotic
Ongoing trials with a monoclonal antibody against lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2), in subjects with advanced liver fibrosis but not cirrhosis secondary to NASH.
NAFLD is among the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide and can potentially progress to cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. A multidisciplinar approach using lifestyle modifications and optimizing metabolic risk factors is still the best option. The available treatment options for NASH include weight loss, dietary and lifestyle modifications, use of insulin sensitizing, Vitamin E and lipid lowering drugs. Despite these large numbers of pharmacological agents that have been used to treat NASH, none of them have a specific and directly effect. In the near future, individualized therapy based on severity of disease and treatment response might be a reality.
None.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
©2015 Siqueira, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.