Short Communication Volume 8 Issue 3
Bartridge Partners, Bartridge House, Umberleigh, UK
Correspondence: R Trevor Wilson, Bartridge Partners, Bartridge House, Umberleigh, EX37 9AS, UK, Tel +44 1769 560244
Received: March 16, 2018 | Published: May 4, 2018
Citation: Wilson RT. The soya bean value chain in Tanzania. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2018;8(3): 229-231. DOI: 10.15406/apar.2018.08.00318
A value chain describes the activities required to move a commodity through the various stages from the first point of production to the last point of consumption. This usually involves (an often complex) combination of physical change, inputs from various producer services, transfer of ownership and delivery.1 Commodity value chains are increasingly recognized as providing a solid framework for the analysis of the public and private sector participants within them as well as the overall performance of particular markets. Tanzania’s soya bean value chain, from supply and use of inputs, via production and processing to marketing and retailing and on to the consumer is confounded by many technical and institutional impediments. The chain is fragmented, unorganized, disorganized, uncontrolled (in spite, in some links, of being over-regulated) and uncoordinated.2 There is an unknown but, in terms of total national smallholder families, small number of households involved in primary production. A very few large farms grow soya on a regular basis but more of this type of production is expected.3–5 Brokers or traders operate across most links of the chain. Some processing is done at household level and there is a (growing) number of small and large scale commercial processors who produce both human food and animal feed with soya as an ingredient.6 Human food containing soya or soya bean meal is sold in some supermarkets and smaller retail outlets. Soya in animal feeds is used by the manufacturer or sold retail to individual livestock farmers mainly in the poultry layer or broiler segment.7 The horizontal and vertical linkages of the value chain are generally weak and uncompetitive and in need of support to strengthen them.
The soya bean value chain includes whole beans and soya bean meal. Both items are produced mainly for the domestic market. Imports are almost all soya bean meal for the livestock feed industry and small amounts of oil for cooking. Processed products are derived after some form of treatment to extract protein (the primary case in Tanzania) or oil. Soya bean meal is the material remaining after solvent extraction or mechanical expelling of oil from the bean and has a protein content of about 50 per cent. The meal is “toasted” (a misnomer because the heat treatment is with moist steam) and then ground in a hammer mill before being incorporated into animal feed. Participants in the chain include primary producers, traders, processors, wholesalers and retailers and consumers. Most participants are rather specialized and their functions relate to one or a very few links in the chain.
The value chain map
The value chain map (Figure 1) shows that the whole is suspended from the end user. If the link to the rest of the chain were to be broken the whole would be susceptible to collapse. This situation is more or less true for all other links in the chain. Each link takes the product from its immediate predecessor and “processes” it to an output that is used by the next link. Nominally, the value of product increases at each stage until it reaches the consumer. It is possible to provide a succinct list of most of the participants in the chain (Table 1) but pivotal roles are played by the middle links through which all products must pass. Many participants in the chain (Table 2) occupy more than one role. Further up the chain some processors are also wholesalers and retailers and operate in both the domestic and export markets. Primary producers may sell beans directly through a market, to a trader or to a processor or may use a combination of all three outlets. A trader can sell to another trader, directly to a wholesaler or retailer or to a processor or, again, may broaden his option by using a combination of these channels. Processors, especially the smaller enterprises, may buy beans directly from farmers or from traders and sell the products to wholesalers or retailers.
Core actors |
Service suppliers |
Producers (smallholder farmers, farmer groups, |
Research Training and Education Institutions |
Traders and agents |
Extension service |
Processors |
Inputs (seed, fertilizer, plant health products) |
Wholesalers |
Transport |
Retailers (shops, supermarkets) |
Financial services |
Importers (soya meal from India and Zambia) |
Associations (producer, trader, processor) |
Table 1 Simple listing of supply and service participants in the Soya Bean Value Chain
Participant |
Functions |
||||||||
Producers |
Most soya beans are grown by traditional smallholders, mostly located in |
||||||||
Traders |
Primary buyers or brokers and secondary buyer-agents operate throughout |
||||||||
Processors |
Some large scale and numerous small and medium scale processors operate |
||||||||
Wholesalers |
Most processors act as their own wholesalers although there is a limited |
||||||||
Retailers |
Processors often act as their own retailers. Supermarkets are the main |
||||||||
Input suppliers |
Little use is made of modern inputs by smallholders. Seeds are available in |
||||||||
Research |
Public sector research on soya is very limited. Uyole Agricultural Research |
Table 2 Participants and functions in the Soya Bean Value Chain
Every link in the chain relies on goods and services in order to fulfil its role(s). At the various stages, goods and services include land, labour, soya beans and meal, input suppliers for fertilizers and plant health products, transport, energy and finance. Also required are clearly defined and enunciated standards and a regulatory framework under–and applied by–law. Many of these requirements continue to be weak or non-existent in Tanzania.
This paper is an extract from a soya bean study which was one of a series of commodity studies carried out by the Tanzania Southern Highlands Food Systems Programme. These studies were financed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Michael Winklmaier, Chief Technical Adviser of the Southern Highlands Food Systems, is thanked for his encouragement and support during the course of the original study. Joan Kimirei, National Consultant to the main project, is thanked for assistance during an extended trip up-country, as is Peter Jimbuku, driver extraordinary and general factotum.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
©2018 Wilson. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.