Research Article Volume 8 Issue 6
Department of Plant Protection, India
Correspondence: Bholanath Mondal, Department of Plant Protection, Palli-Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan 731 236, West Bengal, India
Received: March 17, 2018 | Published: November 16, 2018
Citation: Mondal P, Mondal B. Relative toxicity of some commonly used agro-chemicals against a fresh water fish species, catla catla (ham.). Adv Plants Agric Res. 2018;8(6):376-377. DOI: 10.15406/apar.2018.08.00353
The bioassays were conducted with five insecticides to determine their comparative toxicity to the carp of fresh water fish, Catla catla (Ham.). There was a variation in lethal time of these compounds and the values ranging from 12.57 to 46.24minutes. Of these compounds tested, Oxydemeton-methyl 25% EC was the most toxic followed by Monocrotophos 36% SL, Chlorpyriphos 20% EC and Profenofos 50% EC while Azadirectin (neem formulation) exerted least effect.
Humans have long interfered in nature by extracting natural resources and discarding residues into the environment. This impact has been intensified since the Industrial Revolution with many chemicals now being released into aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems as well as the atmosphere.1 Pesticides, while of undeniable value to agriculture, are also significant agents of environmental impact. Frequently, pesticidal contamination has been found in environments, elements of the food chain and humans2 as these Chemical pollutants enter water bodies as a consequence of rain and leaching from the soil,3 or because it is carelessly discharged directly into aquatic ecosystems. Therefore, the aquatic organisms may show its toxic effects. Toxic effects can be sensed immediately after exposure to toxicants or when followed by a lag. These effects are determined by the toxicological characteristics of the substance and the ability of the organisms to metabolize it. Some toxic effects in aquatic biota are reversible, whereas some others are not, leading the organisms to mortality. In many cases, toxic effects are reversible only if the organisms can escape the toxicant and migrate to an uncontaminated environment.4
Toxicity tests using early life stages of fish are of great importance in assessing risks to growth, reproduction and survival in polluted environments and are important tools for good environmental monitoring.5,6 Such tests indicate those compounds that should be carefully monitored for potential hazards to fishes as they have great importance for food and their commercial values. Among different species of fish present in the fresh water surface body, Catla catla (Ham.) was reported to be more susceptible to water pollution. Therefore, an investigation was carried out to find out the toxic effect of some commonly used agro-chemicals against this fresh water fish species at much lower concentration than recommended field doses for insect control.
Ten carps of C. catla of range between 12-15g were used in each test concentration and in the untreated control. The fishes were released in each glass jar containing one litre of insecticide solution which was prepared by serial dilution. Four organophosphate insecticides (Profenofos 50% EC, Oxydemeton-methyl 25% EC, Chlorpyriphos 20% EC and Monocrotophos 36% SL) and one neem formulation (Azadirachtin 0.15% EC) along with a control were used for bioassay studies. At first, stock solutions were prepared by adding respective recommended field doses of the insecticides in one litre of water and from the stock solutions final concentrations viz 50, 25, 12.5 6.25ppm were made for the bioassay study. The reactions of the fish were recorded at 10minutes intervals for one hour. From the mortalities in different treatments at different time intervals LT50 values were calculated by Probity analysis,7 because this statistical estimate provides a basis for evaluating and comparing the relative toxicity of pesticides used for the experiment. The experiment was carried out at room temperature and LT50 values at highest concentrations of different formulations of insecticide have been recorded.
The relative toxicity of the different agro-chemicals varied against C. catla. The toxicity of the Oxydemeton-methyl 25% EC was maximum followed by Monocrotophos 36% SL, Chlorpyriphos 20% EC and Profenofos 50% EC. The least toxicity was exerted by name formulation. The median lethal time for the above agro-chemicals was 12.57, 13.94, 14.99, 17.58 and 46.24minutes, respectively (Table 1). The toxicity of carbaryl, a carbamate insecticide and its metabolite, 1-naphthol, to four species of fish was studied by Tilak et al.8 The calculated LC50 values of carbaryl for C. catla, Anabas testudineus (Bloch), Mystus cavasius (Ham.) and M. vittatus (Bloch) were 6.4, 6.6, 4.6 and 2.4ppm, respectively, and that of 1-naphthol were 4.3,3, 0.33 and 1.ppm, respectively.
Insecticides |
Field dose |
Highest concentration |
Regression equation |
Heterogenecity c2 (p=0.05) |
LT50 (Min.) (Fiducial limits) |
Profenofos |
2ml/l |
50ppm |
Y= -0.251+4.225X |
1.67 |
17.58(11.77-23.22) |
Oxydemeton-methyl 25% EC |
1ml/l |
50ppm |
Y= 0.484+4.106X |
3.12 |
12.57(6.58-16.81) |
Chlorpyriphos |
2.5ml/l |
50ppm |
Y= 0.876+3.506X |
1.46 |
14.99(5.97-23.84) |
Monocrotophos3% SL |
1.5ml/l |
50ppm |
Y= 0.408+4.011X |
0.53 |
13.94(7.49-19.03) |
Azadirachtin |
1.5ml/l |
50ppm |
Y=1.524+ 2.087X |
0.28 |
46.24(21.08-101.44) |
Table 1 Median lethal time of different agro-chemicals against C. catla
At the present time, there are no magic numbers to plug into a formula for the estimation of a so-called "safe concentration" from static, acute toxicity bioassays. Subacute and chronic studies utilizing both fish and other such organisms are necessary to determine sublethal effects. The significant physiological effects on these organisms may be used for the development of water quality criteria for aquatic life. The hazard of a pesticide to aquatic life depends upon the degree of its use and toxicity. The relative toxicity values reported in the present investigation indicated that most of these pesticides were extremely toxic and could be considered hazardous for aquatic life.
None.
Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
©2018 Mondal, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.