Mini Review Volume 8 Issue 6
1Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, India
2Associate Research Scientist, Biocontrol Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology, Junagadh Agricultural University, India
3Assistant Research Scientist, Grassland Research Station, Dhari, Junagadh Agricultural University, India
Correspondence: C Divya, Ph.D. Student, Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh - 362 001, Gujarat, India
Received: October 13, 2018 | Published: December 19, 2018
Citation: Divya C, Jethva DM, Kanara HG. Laboratory efficacy of HaNPV against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera(Hubner) infesting chickpea. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2018;8(6):483-486. DOI: 10.15406/apar.2018.08.00371
The experiment on laboratory efficacy of HaNPV against H. armigera infesting chickpea revealed that there was gradual increase in larval mortality along with increase in dosage of HaNPV. The trend followed a pattern of higher the dosage of inoculum, higher was the larval mortality. All the treatments caused the mortality in 3rd instar larvae of H. armigera. The highest larval mortality was obtained in the treatment of HaNPV @ 0.875ml/l (95.52%), which was at par with the treatment of HaNPV 0.750 ml/l (90.00%). It was also recorded that in all the treatments, higher larval mortality was recorded on 3rd to 5th day after treatment.
Among the food crops, pulses are an important group which occupies a unique position in the world of agriculture by virtue of their high protein content. The production of cereals has increased manifold in the recent past but that of pulses has remained more or less static. Insect pests are probably the main factor limiting the grain legume yields. More than 150 species of insects are known to attack pulse crops in India and of these, about 25 causes serious damage to monsoon and winter pulse crops.1 Out of them, the gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a most cosmopolitan and polyphagous pest which attacks numerous crops of agricultural importance and widely distributed for the tropic and sub-tropic. The indiscriminate use of pesticides for the last 40 years has almost eliminated natural enemies from many crop eco-systems, created complications of environment pollution, pest resurgence and insecticide resistance (Ma et al., 2000). This scenario has led to consider the potential of biological control as a component of pest management. Bio pesticides based on baculoviruses group especially the nucleopolyhedrosis virus (NPV) offers great scope against H. armigera. NPV is known for high epizootic levels and is naturally occurring obligate parasite, self- perpetuating, safe to natural enemies due to host specificity and environmental friendly.
Rearing of test insect on natural diet
The culture of H. armigera was maintained in the laboratory for experimental purpose by making initial larval collection of H. armigera from chickpea field. The field - collected larvae were reared individually on chickpea pods in plastic vials under laboratory conditions. Fresh food was changed every day in morning. The larvae being pre-pupated were transferred into plastic vial containing sieved moist soil to facilitate the pupation. They were reared until the adult emergence. The newly emerged adults were transferred to a wooden cage measuring 30cm x 30cm for oviposition. Five per cent honey solution was provided as food for moths. The freshly laid eggs were collected daily and reared till hatching in Petri dish (15cm diameter). The newly hatched larvae were used for the further study purpose.
Treatment details
Treatment no. |
Treatment |
Dose/ litre water |
T1 |
HaNPV |
0.250ml/l |
T2 |
HaNPV |
`0.375ml/l |
T3 |
HaNPV |
0.500ml/l |
T4 |
HaNPV |
0.625ml/l |
T5 |
HaNPV |
0.750ml/l |
T6 |
HaNPV |
0.875ml/l |
T7 |
Control |
- |
Local strain of HaNPV, which was commercially produced in the Bio control Research Laboratory, J.A.U. Junagadh was used for this laboratory experiment. The immature pods of chickpea grown in pots was collected and sprayed with respective treatments in the laboratory. In each treatment, six hours starved 10 larvae of the third instar were transferred into Petri dishes containing the treated immature pods and then the treatments were replicated thrice (Figure 1). The larvae were allowed to feed on the treated food for 24 hrs and then they were provided with fresh untreated immature pods on next day.
Observations recorded
Larval mortality was recorded from 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days after application. The percentage of larval mortality was corrected by Abbott's formula (1925) and modified by Henderson and Tilton (1955).
Where,
Effect on larval survival
Data on instar-wise larval mortality (Plate 2) due to HaNPV are presented in Table 1 and depicted in Figure 2 shows the healthy and HaNPV infected instar wise larvae ofH. armigera. The data showed that on first, second and third day after feeding significantly higher mortality was recorded in the first and second instar larvae as compared to third, fourth and fifth instar larvae of H. armigera. The mortality in the first and second instar larvae was recorded to be higher as 40.00 and 20.00% respectively, on first day after feeding, whereas, on the same day there was no mortality was recorded in fourth and fifth instar larvae. Data (Table 1) revealed that there was a consistent decrease in mortality from first to fifth instar larvae. It can also be seen that the total larval mortality among instar wise larvae ranged from 26.66 to 100.00% on eighth day after feeding. The highest mortality was recorded in the first instar larvae (100.00%), followed by second (70.00%), third (56.66%), fourth (36.66%) and fifth (26.66%). Thus, the results clearly indicated that the first instar larvae proved to be most susceptible to HaNPV followed by larvae of second instar. The third instar was found moderately susceptible, while, the fourth and fifth instar larvae were found to be less susceptible to HaNPV.
Figure 2 Larval mortality, failed pupation and adult emergence (%) and cumulative mortality in H. armigera due to HaNPV.
Effect on pupal survival
Almost on eighth day after the treatment, larvae escaped HaNPV infection moved into pupal stage. The percentage of instar wise larvae succeeded for pupation was also worked out after their rearing on treated leaves with HaNPV and on next day they were reared on unsprayed fresh leaves. It can be seen from Table 1 that no pupa was recorded in the first instar (0.00%). In case of second and third instar lower pupal percentage was recorded (30.00 to 43.34%). The highest per cent of pupation was recorded in fifth instar (73.34%), which was followed by fourth instar (63.34%). The pupae failed to emerge into adult was also recorded and it was found to be highest in the fourth instar (13.33%) and it was at par with second and fifth instar (10.00%) and third instar (13.33%). Plate 2 shows the healthy and HaNPV infected pupae of H. armigera.
Instar tested |
Larval mortality (%) after days |
Total larval mortality (%) |
Pupation (%) |
Pupae failed to emerge (%) |
Deformed adult (%) |
Cumulative mortality (%) |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
||||||
1st |
39.52 |
33.52 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
4.05 |
90 |
0 |
4.05 |
4.05 |
100 |
-40 |
-30 |
-10 |
-10 |
-10 |
0 |
-100 |
0 |
0 |
|||
2nd |
26.92 |
18.9 |
24.25 |
21.57 |
18.9 |
4.05 |
57.1 |
30 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
90 |
-20 |
-10 |
-16.66 |
-13.33 |
-10 |
0 |
-70 |
-10 |
-10 |
|||
3rd |
13.95 |
18.9 |
24.25 |
21.57 |
18.9 |
4.05 |
49.13 |
43.34 |
13.95 |
21.57 |
76.65 |
-6.66 |
-10 |
-16.66 |
-13.33 |
-10 |
0 |
-56.66 |
-6.66 |
-13.33 |
|||
4th |
4.05 |
9 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
21.57 |
4.05 |
37.52 |
63.34 |
21.57 |
26.92 |
69.99 |
0 |
-3.33 |
-10 |
-10 |
-13.33 |
0 |
-36.66 |
-13.33 |
-20 |
|||
5th |
4.05 |
4.05 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
4.05 |
13.95 |
31.32 |
73.34 |
18.9 |
26.92 |
56.66 |
0 |
0 |
-10 |
-10 |
0 |
-6.66 |
-26.66 |
-10 |
-20 |
|||
S.Em.± |
2.21 |
2.21 |
1.69 |
1.69 |
1.19 |
2.21 |
1.58 |
- |
2.52 |
1.19 |
- |
C.D. at 5% |
6.98 |
6.98 |
NS |
NS |
3.76 |
6.98 |
4.99 |
- |
7.93 |
3.76 |
- |
CV % |
21.66 |
22.72 |
13.91 |
14.65 |
12.56 |
63.54 |
5.18 |
- |
28.15 |
10.52 |
- |
Table 1 Larval mortality, pupation (%) and cumulative mortality in H. armigera due to HaNPV
Note: Data in parenthesis are original values, while outsides are angular transformed values (sin-1√x+0.5).
Effect on adult emergence
From the data on percentage emergence of the deformed adult from pupae (Table 1) indicated that the highest percentage of deformed adults (20.00%) was recorded in fourth and fifth instars which was followed by third instar (13.33%). The lowest emergence of deformed adult was recorded in second in star (10.00%).
Cumulative mortality
Data presented in Table 1 showed that the cumulative (Larval + Pupal) mortality due to HaNPV ranged from 56.66 to 100.00% in all the instars. The scent per cent cumulative mortality was recorded in the first in star, followed by second 90.00%), third (76.65%), fourth (69.99%) and fifth in stars (56.66%). The cumulative mortality in all the instars averaged 78.66%. The present result on cumulative effect of HaNPV, thus, showed that HaNPV @ 0.500ml/l caused 56.66 to 100.00% mortality averaging 78.66% mortality in H. armigera on chickpea. Present study of cumulative effect of HaNPV against different instars of H. armigera showed that there was a consistent decrease in larval mortality in accordance with the five instars from day one to eight of larval rearing after one day feeding on HaNPV treated chickpea leaves and immature pods. The total mortality among larval instars ranged from 26.66 to 100.00% with an average of 58.00% on eighth day after feeding The larvae according to progress in instars did succeed in ascending order for pupation (0.00 to 73.34%), pupae failed to emerge (6.66 to13.33%) and deformity of the adult (10.00 to 20.00%).2
The cumulative (Larval + pupal) mortality due to HaNPV @ 0.500 ml/l ranged from 56.66 to 100.00% with an average of 78.66% in all the five instars.Thus, it is concluded from the experiment that the early instar larvae were found more susceptible than the later instars larvae. Thus, the management of the pest by spraying of HaNPV should be scheduled at earliest, possibly during egg stage or 1st instar larval stage.
None.
The authors declared there is no conflicts of interest.
©2018 Divya, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.