Submit manuscript...
Advances in
eISSN: 2373-6402

Plants & Agriculture Research

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 6

Field efficacy of fungicides to manage leaf spot of areca nut

Gurudatt M Hegde

Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology, College of Forestry, Sirsi, University of Agricultural Sciences, India

Correspondence: Gurudatt M Hegde, Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology, College of Forestry, Sirsi, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Received: November 03, 2018 | Published: December 19, 2018

Citation: Hegde GM. Field efficacy of fungicides to manage leaf spot of areca nut. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2018;8(6):496-498. DOI: 10.15406/apar.2018.08.00374

Download PDF

Abstract

Arecanut one of the major plantation crops of India suffers heavily due to leaf spot disease caused by the fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Phyllosticta arecae. This disease has caused 60 per cent yield loss in the neglected orchards of uttar kannada district. The experiment conducted during kharif 2012-13 and 2013-14 revealed that triazole molecules namely hexaconazole and difenconazole were found superior in reducing the disease incidence and maximizing the yields.

Keywords: arecanut, triazoles, management

Introduction

Areca nut (Areca catechu L.) is a perennial fruit plant belonging to the family palmaceae and it is an important cash crop of India. It is the most important crop grown mainly in hill and coastal parts of the country. In most of the gardens areca nut is grown in multistoried cropping systems. Leaf spot of areca nut caused by fungi Colletotrichum gloeosporiodes and Phyllosticta arecae attacks the crop even at the seedling stage. Established areca trees suffer due to this disease and cause yield loss up to 60 percent. Leaf spot is a very serious problem in all over the areca nut growing regions of India. Leaf spot of areca nut though a minor disease in the past, has now become a major problem in areca nut cultivation especially during rainy season. The disease was first reported from India by Rao in 1964.1 The areca palm (Areca catechu L.) is one of the important plantation crops in India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka is susceptible to various diseases and leaf blight caused Phyllosticta arecae is one of the important diseases causing heavy damage especially during rainy season. In Uttar Kannada district average per cent infection per leaf due to leaf spot disease ranged from 2.13 to 29.65, 4.18 to 36.70 and 2.50 to 25.35 on areca nut.2 Of late the leaf spot disease is becoming very alarming and has lead to the poor growth of the young seedlings and also grown up palms. Farmers are still using the age old chemicals like carbendaziim, mancozeb and chlorothalonil which were earlier recommended.3,4 Therefore, present investigation was more focused on use of triazole compounds for the management of leaf spot of Areca nut.

Materials and methods

Field efficacy of fungicides were tested against the management of leaf spot disease of areca nut during kharif 2012and 2013 under natural endemic field conditions. The details of the experiments are given here under.


Year : Kharif 2012 and 2013

Location : Farmers fields of sirsi taluk

Variety : Sirsi local

Design : RCBD

No. of treatments:08

Observations: Percent Disease Index, Yield & Cost economics

No. of replications :03

Spacing :9’X9’

Details of the treatments are given below

Sl. No

Treatment

First spray (after onset of the disease)

Second spray (30days after I spray)

1

Carbendazim@ 0.1%

Carbendazim@ 0.1%

2

Mancozeb@ 0.2 %

Mancozeb@ 0.2 %

3

Chlorothalonil @ 0.2%

Chlorothalonil@ 0.2%

4

Saaf@ 0.2% (Carbendazim+Mancozeb)

Saaf@ 0.2%(Carbendazim+Mancozeb)

5

Difenconazole @ 0.1%

Difenconazole@ 0.1%

6

Hexaconazole@ 0.1%

Hexaconazole@ 0.1%

7

Potassium phosphonate@ 0.3%

Potassium phosphonate@ 0.3%

8

Control (untreated)

 

 

First sprays of each fungicide were taken up soon after the occurrence of the disease and further spray was given at 30 days interval. New molecules were tested against the recommended fungicides. One untreated control treatment was also maintained for comparison. Percent disease index was calculated from these observations by using 0-6 scale5

Where,
0=no symptoms
1 less than 1% of lamina with symptoms (only streaks and/or up to 10 spots)
2= 1-5% lamina with symptoms
3= 6-15 % lamina with symptoms
4= 16-33% lamina with symptoms
5= 34-50% lamina with symptoms
6=51-100%
Per cent disease index (PDI) was calculated by using the formula.6

PDI= Sum of numerical ratings Total no. of observations X highest disease grade ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcfaOaamiuai aadseacaWGjbGaeyypa0ZaaSaaaeaaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiaadofacaWG 1bGaamyBaiaabccacaWGVbGaamOzaiaabccacaWGUbGaamyDaiaad2 gacaWGLbGaamOCaiaadMgacaWGJbGaamyyaiaadYgacaqGGaGaamOC aiaadggacaWG0bGaamyAaiaad6gacaWGNbGaam4CaaWdaeaapeGaam ivaiaad+gacaWG0bGaamyyaiaadYgacaqGGaGaamOBaiaad+gacaGG UaGaaeiiaiaad+gacaWGMbGaaeiiaiaad+gacaWGIbGaam4Caiaadw gacaWGYbGaamODaiaadggacaWG0bGaamyAaiaad+gacaWGUbGaam4C aiaabccacaWGybGaaeiiaiaadIgacaWGPbGaam4zaiaadIgacaWGLb Gaam4CaiaadshacaqGGaGaamizaiaadMgacaWGZbGaamyzaiaadgga caWGZbGaamyzaiaabccacaWGNbGaamOCaiaadggacaWGKbGaamyzaa aapaGaey41aqRaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaaaaa@7F9C@

Yields and economics

Yields of arecanuts was recorded by harvesting separately and converted it in to q/ac.

Results and discussion

Various treatments have been tried for effective management of leaf spot disease of Arecanut during 2009 and 2010 and the results are presented in Table 1 during the present investigations new molecule Hexaconazole and Difenconazole was used and compared with the recommended molecules. During 2009, Hexaconazole @0.1% and Difenconazole @0.1% were found superior in reducing the leaf spot disease incidence to the extent of 15.60 % and 13.28% respectively. Similar trend was observed during 2010. The pooled data of both the years also revealed the lesser disease incidence of 16.07 % and 13.74% respectively was recorded in Difenconazole @0.1% and Hexaconazole @0.1% However, it is clear from the pooled data of the two years that, Saaf, a combi product consists of carbendazim and mancozeb was found to be the next effective treatment (24.15%) and found on par with carbendazim (25.78%) and mancozeb (25.65%). The maximum disease incidence was recorded in the untreated control plots (49.68%). The yield data was also recorded on plot basis and converted in to quintal/ha basis (Table 1). During 2009 the maximum yields of 28.76q/h and 27.42q/ha was recorded in the treatments sprayed with Difenconazole @0.1% and Hexaconazole @0.1% respectively. This is followed by 23.75 q/h in the treatment spared with carbendazim @0.1%. Almost similar trend was recorded during 2010. The pooled data revealed that, the significant higher yields were obtained in the treatments sprayed with Difenconazole @ 0.1% (27.52q/ha) and Hexaconazole @0.1%(26.69 q/ha) and both these treatments found on par with each other. This is followed by 23.05 q/ha in carbendazim @ 0.1% sprayed plots followed by Mancozeb @0.2% (22.20 q/h), saaf@0.2% (21.51q/ha) and chlorothalonil @ 0.2% (20.92 q/ha) which also are found on par with each other. The least yields were recorded in the untreated control plots (16.48q/ha).

Sl. No

Treatment

PDI

Yield q/ha

2012

2013

Pooled

2012

2013

Pooled

1

Carbendazim @ 0.1%

25.21

26.35

25.78

23.75

22.36

23.05

-30.13

-30.92

-30.51

2

Mancozeb @ 0.2 %

26.96

24.7

25.65

20.61

23.78

22.2

-31.24

-29.8

-30.4

3

Chlorothalonil @ 0.2%

27.48

26.45

29.96

20.45

21.39

20.92

-31.63

-30.98

-31.28

4

Saaf @ 0.2%

24.67

23.63

24.15

21.24

21.78

21.51

-29.73

-29.06

-29.47

5

Difenconazole @ 0.1%

13.28

14.21

13.74

28.76

26.28

27.52

-21.39

-22.34

-21.75

6

Hexaconazole @ 0.1%

15.6

16.55

16.07

27.42

25.91

26.69

-23.26

-24.04

-23.63

7

Akomin @ 0.3%

39.59

32.09

35.84

17.5

21.37

17.93

-39

-34.52

-36.77

8

Control

52.87

47.07

49.68

15.27

17.57

16.48

-46.61

-43.34

-44.77

SEm+

1.19

1.41

1.28

0.34

0.46

0.44

CD @ 5%

4.2

3.28

3.84

1.13

1.38

1.32

CV

 

15.23

16.24

16.69

 

 

 

Table 1 Management of leaf spot of Arecanut

The effectiveness of Difenconazole @0.1% is also in agreement with the studies conducted by Jamadar and Patil7 in reducing the anthracnose disease of pomegranate caused by Colletotrichum spp. Hegde and Mesta8 reported, that, the plots sprayed thrice with Haxaconazole @0.1% has significantly reduced the leaf spot disease of banana to the extent of 13.74 per cent. The effectiveness of the Hexaconazole was judged on the basis of increased yield per unit along with the reduced disease intensity. Three sprays with hexaconazole (H-H-H) @0.1% has considerably reduced the rust of soybean with the highest yields of 24.79q/ha along with enhanced impact on quality traits like protein and oil content on the soya seeds. This treatment also resulted in obtaining the highest benefit cost ratio.9 Patel and Joshi10 reported that, both the triazole compounds hexaconazole @0.1% and difenconazole @0.1% were found promising in managing the leaf spot of turmeric. The effectiveness of triazole fungicides like Hexaconazole and Difenconazole may be attributed to their interference with the biosynthesis of fungal sterols and inhibit the ergosterol biosynthesis. In many fungi, ergosterol is essential to the structure of cell wall and its absence cause irreparable damage to cell wall leading to death of fungal cell. These results are in agreement with the studies conducted by Laxman11and Jayalakshmi.11–13

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rao VG. The genus Phyllesticta in Bombay –Maharastra – IV. Mycopath. fluycol. 1964;28:19–22.
  2. Bhat RG. Studies on leaf blight of arecanut (Areca catechu L.) caused by Phyllosticta arecae Hohnel. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, U.A.S. Bangalore, India; 1983. 121 p.
  3. Hebbar BS. Further studies on leafblight of arecanut caused by Phyllosticta arecae hohnel, M.Sc. thesis, university of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India; 1992.
  4. Ramanujam B, Chandramohan R. Nmbair KKN. Studies on Leaf spot diseaes of areca nut: symptoms ,cause and control. Journal of Plantation Crops. 1993;21(Suppl):123–128.
  5. Gauchl F, Pasberg Gauhl C, Vuylsteke D, et al. Multi location Evaluation of black sigatoka resistance in Banana and Plantain. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Research Guide, 47, Ibudan, Nigeria: 1993;59.
  6. Wheeler BE J. An Introduction to Plant Diseases. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. London; 1969. 301 p.
  7. Jamadar MM. Etiology, Epidemiology and management of anthracnose of grapevine. Ph.D. Thesis. Uni. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, Karnataka, India; 2007.
  8. Hegde, Gurudatt M, Mesta RK. Integrated management of Sigatoka leaf spot of Banana. Supplement on Plant Pathology. 2014;9(1):359–362.
  9. Hegde, Gurudatt M, Mesta RK. Integrated management of Soybean rust. International Journal of Life science & Pharma Research. 2012;2(1):44–48.
  10. Patel RV, Joshi KR. Efficacy of different fungicides against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz and Sacc. causing leaf spot of turmeric. J Mycol Pl Path. 2002;32:413–414.
  11. Laxman R. Studies on leafspot of green gram caused by Colletotrichum truncatu. M.Sc. (Agri.), Thesis. Uni. Agric.Sci., Dharwad, Karnataka, India; 2006.
  12. Jayalakshmi K. Studies on anthracnose of pomegranate caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz and Sacc. M.Sc. (Agri.), Thesis. Uni. Agric.Sci., Dharwad, Karnataka, India; 2010.
  13. Hegde Gurudatt M, Nargund VB, Nayak GV. Onion twister disease and its Management in coastal parts of the Karnataka state. Indian Journal of Plant Protection. 2014;43(1):90–93.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Hegde. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.