Submit manuscript...
Advances in
eISSN: 2373-6402

Plants & Agriculture Research

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 6

Exogenous application of moringa seed extract positively alters fruit yield and its contaminant contents of Capsicum annuum plants grown on a saline soil contaminated with heavy metals

El Sayed M Desoky,1 Ahmed S Elrys,2 Gamal F Mohamed,3 Mostafa M Rady3

1Botany Department, Zagazig University, Egypt
2Soil Science Department, Zagazig University, Egypt
3Botany Department, Fayoum University, Egypt

Correspondence: Mostafa M Rady, Botany Department, Fayoum University, Egypt

Received: August 29, 2018 | Published: December 26, 2018

Citation: Desoky EM, Elrys AS, Mohamed GF, et al. Exogenous application of moringa seed extract positively alters fruit yield and its contaminant contents of Capsicum annuum plants grown on a saline soil contaminated with heavy metals. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2018;8(6):591-601. DOI: 10.15406/apar.2018.08.00390

Download PDF

Abstract

Enhancing plant productivity on contaminated soils by using natural supplementations are urgently seeking. Two main field trials were conducted to study the potential effects of moringa seed (MSE; 0.5%) extraction growth and yield, physio-biochemical components, antioxidant defense system, and contamination of pepper plants grown on heavy metals-contaminated saline soil. MSE was applied in two single treatments (i.e., with drip irrigation water; SA or as foliar spray; FS) or in integrative (i.e., MSE-SA + MSE-FS) treatment. The results showed that all single or integrative treatments significantly increased plant growth and yield, leaf contents of leaf photosynthetic pigments, free proline, total soluble sugars, N, P, and K+, ratio of K+/Na+, and activities of CAT, POX, APX, SOD and GR, while significantly reduced contaminants; Na+, Cd, Cu, Pb and Ni contents in plant leaves and fruits compared to the control (free from MSE). Additionally, the integrative MSE-SA + MSE-FS treatment significantly exceeded all single treatments in this concern. The integrative MSE-SA + MSE-FS treatment was the best that it had been recommended for maximizing pepper fruits with minimizing contaminants on heavy metal-contaminated saline soils.

Keyword: pepper, productivity, plant extract, stress, antioxidant system

Introduction

Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is an economically important vegetable crop due to its nutritional value, antioxidant compounds, bioactive products, and natural colors for human health.1 Pepper is considered as salt sensitive2 or moderately salt sensitive3 based on its growth stage. The salinity threshold level of pepper is averaged 1.5dS m‒1.4 In addition, peppers like most of vegetables cultivated in Egypt are sometimes grown in heavy metals-contaminated soils close to factories and industrial cities. These soils are exposed to heavy metals contamination by which soils are contaminated up to the unpermitted levels,5 negatively reflecting in plant growth and productivity,6 and the contaminants will accumulate in plant edible parts (i.e., pepper fruits). Heavy metals enter into soil by many ways, including chemical fertilizers, atmospheric precipitation, and wastes of agricultural industries.7 The response to heavy metal stress involves a complicated signal transduction network that is activated by sensing the heavy metals and is characterized by the synthesis of stress-related proteins and signaling molecules, and finally the transcriptional activation of specific metal-responsive genes to counteract the stress.8

Salinity is one of the major abiotic stresses limiting plant performance (growth and yield), especially in arid and semi-arid regions including Egypt. It causes a reduction in plant performance at varying degrees depending on the salinity level.9 High salinity causes ion disequilibrium, osmotic (physiological drought) and oxidative stresses in plant tissues,10 which inhibit the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments and photosynthetic process,11 inducing an over-reduction of the reaction centers in photo system II that may destruct the photosynthetic machinery if the plant is unable to consume excess energy.12 Salinity effects are attributed, mainly, to the decrease of soil water potential or the increase of ion concentration in plant tissue to levels that interfere with metabolism.13 The common consequence of most abiotic stresses, including salinity and heavy metals;5,14,15 are an overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS; 1O2, O2•−, H2O2, and OH‒)that are extremely toxic to plants. They caused damages to DNA, proteins, lipids,and chlorophyll.16 However, plants are well equipped with antioxidant defense systems consisted of antioxidant enzymes (i.e., superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, glutathione reductase, etc.) and non-enzymatic low molecule antioxidants (i.e., proline, tocopherols, carotenoids, glutathione, ascorbic acid, etc.) to counteract the oxidative stress to protect plants from the oxidative injuries,17 and the extent of oxidative cellular damage in abiotic-stressed plants is controlled by the capacity of their antioxidant systems.18-20 In most cases, the endogenous antioxidant defense systems of plants are not enough to maintain healthy growth of plants, therefore, plants need an exogenous support such as plant extracts to increase their tolerance to the stress.14-24

Plant extracts contain natural growth-promoting substances such as phytohormones, osmoprotectants, antioxidants, and nutrients, which are important to strengthen the antioxidant defense systems of plants to efficiently face the environmental stresses. Among these extracts, moringa (Moringa oleifera L.) seed extract (MSE) that contains plant performance enhancing capabilities. It is rich source in antioxidants and osmo protectants such as proline, soluble sugars, ascorbic acid, glutathione, and selenium. It is also rich in phytohormones including significant amounts of auxins, gibberellins, and zeatin-type cytokinins, and nutrient elements. There are many different plant extracts that are used as effective natural bio stimulants for supporting the plants grown under several environmental stresses.14,20-25 To our knowledge, however, studies using MSE as a natural bio stimulantisvery scarcely applied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the potential effects of the exogenous MSE supplemented in drip irrigation water (SA) and/or as foliar spray (FS) on the changes of growth and yield, physio-biochemical components, mineral nutrients and heavy metal accumulation, and the antioxidant defense system of pepper plants grown on heavy metal (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Ni)-contaminated saline (EC=7.73–7.78dS m‒1) soil. The hypothesis tested herein is that supplementation of the integrative MSE-SA + MSE-FSwill promote plant growth and productivity through reducing the accumulation of heavy metals and improving the levels of nutrients and osmoprotectants, and the activity of non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants that play crucial roles in alleviating the stress produced by salinity and heavy metals.

Materials and methods

Experimental layout

A preliminary field trial was performed in 2015 season, and two main field trials were conducted in both 2016 and 2017 seasons on special farms at Al-Husayniyah, Sharkyya Governorate, Egypt. Soil samples were randomly selected from the study sites before each agricultural season and analyzed according to Black et al.,26 and Jackson27 and the results are shown in Table 1. According to soil analyses results before planting, soil EC values were 7.73 and 7.78dS m‒1of the soils of both 2016 and 2017 seasons, respectively, indicating that are saline soils.28 EC analyses for the different soils were conducted in soil paste extract. The saline soil was also contaminated with some heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), lead (Pb) and nickel (Ni) that were detected through soil analyses (Table 1) and indicated that it is contaminated soil based on the concentrations of these metals.29

Soil characteristic

Value

Unit

2016

2017

 

Soil particles distribution:

   

Sand

43.4

43.3

%

Silt

28.7

28.6

 

Clay

27.9

28.1

 

Textural class

Loam

 

 

Field capacity

15.8

15.2

%

CaCO3

29.6

32.7

g kg‒1

Organic matter

6.95

6.42

 

pH*

7.32

7.28

 

EC**

7.73

7.78

dS m‒1

Soluble cations and anions**:

 

 

Ca2+

20.6

21.4

mmolc L‒1

Mg2+

15.8

15.1

 

Na+

30.4

30.9

 

K+

5.26

5.62

 

CO32‒

-

-

 

HCO3‒

8.91

6.86

 

Cl

21.3

20.4

 

SO42‒

48.5

51.9

 

Available nutrient:

 

 

 

N

33.4

31.9

mg kg‒1 soil

P

8.72

7.87

 

K

104

103

 

Heavy metals:

 

 

 

Cu

106

109

mg kg‒1 soil

Cd

18.1

18.7

 

Ni

259

253

 

Pb

253

248

 

Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of the investigated soil for two experimental seasons

*Soil paste; **Soil paste extract.

Seeds of pepper (Capsicum annuum L., cv. Top Star) were provided by Sacata Co., Cairo, Egypt. In both 2016 and 2017 seasons, seeds were sown on 28th February using growing trays and the 45-day-old seedlings were transplanted into the field in plots (3.0×3.50m=10.5m2)on rows spaced 60cm, and the distances among transplants were 15–20cm. Before sowing, all plots of the experiments were fertilized with 100kg potassium sulfate (50% K2O) ha‒1 and 200 kg calcium superphosphate (15.5% P2O5) ha‒1. Nitrogen fertilizer was added at a rate of 250 kg ammonium nitrate (33% N) ha‒1. The empirical design of experiments was a completely randomized plots for 4 treatments each with 9 replicates. The details of the 4 treatments are as follows: 1. Control; no extract was added in drip irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water, 2. MSE-SA; moringa seed extract was added in drip irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water, 3. MSE-FS; no extracts were added in drip irrigation water+ foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract, 4. MSE-SA+MSE-FS; moringa seed extract was added in drip irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract.

Extraction, analyses, and applications of MSE

Each 200g of air-dried ground Moringa oleifera seeds was put in 2L of 80% ethanol and strongly stirred on a shaker for 5h to effectively extract the seed active ingredients. The mixture was then filtered using What man No.2 filter paper and the filtration was evaporated using a big Fan to completely get rid of the alcohol. The extract was reached to 40 L by distilled water. The Moringa oleifera seed extract should be used within 5 h from extraction process otherwise was stored at‒20°C and only taken out when it requested to use. MSE was analyzed for main chemical components that are shown in Table 2. MSE (0.5%; 5 g seeds per L) was applied as foliar sprays (FS) three times; 20, 35, and 50 days after transplanting (DAT) to run-off with adding few drops of Tween-20 to the solutions as a surfactant to assure an effective and complete penetration of the spray solutions. In addition, MSE was applied as a Rhizosphere application by adding 200 L extract (0.5%) ha‒1to drip irrigation water three times with the 2nd, 4th, and 6th irrigation.

Component

Values

Unit

1. Antioxidants and osmoprotectants:

 

 Free proline

32

g kg−1 DW

 Soluble sugars

176

 

 Glutathione (GSH)

22.4

mg kg−1 DW

 Ascorbic acid (AsA; Vit. C)

34.8

 

 Selenium (Se)

0.8

 

 DPPH-radical scavenging

81.3

%

2. Phytohormones:

 

 

 Total auxins

3.3

mg kg−1 DW

 Total gibberellins

2.9

 

 Zeatin-type cytokinin

3.2

 

3. Mineral nutrients:

 

 

 Nitrogen(N)

30.8

g kg−1 DW

 Phosphorus(P)

15.8

 

 Potassium(K)

21.7

 

 Calcium(Ca)

9.6

 

 Magnesium(Mg)

4.5

 

 Sulfur(S)

2.7

 

 Iron(Fe)

1.5

 

 Manganese(Mn)

0.9

 

 Zinc(Zn)

0.4

 

 Cupper(Cu)

0.2

 

Table 2 Chemical analysis of the Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) (on dry weight basis)

Growth and yield attributes

Ten pepper plants were selected randomly and cut off from the two outer rows of every experimental plot at60DAT to estimate shoot dry weight (tonha‒1). At the merchantable stage, fruits from 50 plants on each plot were reaped to estimate number of fruits plant‒1, and fruit yield (tonsha‒1).

Determination of physio-biochemical constituents

Total chlorophylls and total carotenoids were extracted from fresh leaf using pure acetone and determined (as mg g‒1 fresh mass) according to Fadeels,30 the method of Bates et al.31 was used to determine proline accumulation in pepper leaves, and total soluble sugars content was estimated according to Irigoyen et al.,32 For nutrients and heavy metal determinations, a weight of 0.2 g of dried leaves was digested with H2SO4 in the presence of H2O233 and then, N content was determined using a micro Kjeldahl method according to Chapman and Pratt,34 P content was determined calorimetrically using ascorbic acid method of Watanabe and Olsen,35 and Na+ and K+ contents were measured directly using Flame photometer.36 The powdery dried plant samples (upper fully-expanded leaves and yielded fruits) were ashed at 500°C for 12 h to determine heavy metal ions concentrations. The ashed samples were dissolved in 3.3% HNO3 (v/v). The concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Ni were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Varian, and Australia). Measurements of the all tested heavy metals in plants were checked against certificated Cd, Cu, Pb, and Ni values in different reference plant materials obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Gaithersburg, USA).

Determination of antioxidants activities

Enzymes were extracted according to Vitoria et al.,37 The activity of catalase (CAT) enzyme was assessed spectrophotochemically according to Chance & Maehly.38 Peroxidase (POX) activity was estimated according to Thomas et al.,39 Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity was determined spectrophotochemically according to Fielding & Hall.40 Activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was determined by recording the drop in absorbance of superoxide-nitro blue tetrazolium complex by the enzyme.41 Glutathione reductase (GR) activity was measured after monitoring the oxidation of NADPH for three absorbance times taken at 340 nm.42

Statistical analysis

Statistically significant variations between means were compared at P≤0.05 by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The statistical analysis was done by COSTAT computer software (CoHort Software version 6.303, Berkeley, CA, USA).

Results

Growth, yield, photosynthetic pigments, antioxidants, and osmoprotectants

Compared to the control (both drip irrigation water and foliar sprays were free from MSE), the single (i.e., MSE applied as Rhizosphere supplementation with the drip irrigation water; SA or as foliar spray; FS) or integrative (i.e., MSE-SA+ MSE-FS) treatments significantly increased plant growth (in terms of shoot dry weight), yield parameters (i.e., No. of fruits per plant, and fruits yield per hectare), and the contents of total chlorophylls, total carotenoids, free proline, and total soluble sugars of pepper plants grown on a heavy metals-contaminated saline soil (Table 3) & (Table 4). In addition, the integrative MSE-SA+MSE-FS treatment significantly exceeded the single treatments conferring the best results. It increased shoot dry weight by69 and 70%, No. of fruits on plant by 111 and 142%, fruits yield by 138 and 146%, chlorophylls content by 66 and 64%, carotenoids content by 45 and 36%, proline content by 80 and 78%, and soluble sugars by 88 and 94% in both 2016 and 2017 growing seasons, respectively. These results show similar trends over both growing seasons. 

Treatments

Shoot DWha‒1(tons)

Fruits No.plant‒1

Fruits yield ha‒1 (tons)

2016

     

Control

9.8±0.9d

1.9±0.6d

17.0±0.5d

MSE-SA

11.3±0.9c

2.3±0.4c

21.6±0.6c

MSE-FS

13.1±0.8b

3.2±0.4b

29.7±1.3b

MSE-SA + MSE-FS

16.6±0.9a

4.0±0.3a

40.5±1.2a

2017

     

Control

10.3±0.9d

1.9±0.4d

17.7±0.6d

MSE-SA

12.3±0.8c

2.3±0.5c

24.5±0.6c

MSE-FS

14.0±0.7b

3.5±0.8b

32.4±1.1b

MSE-SA + MSE-FS

17.5±0.9a

4.6±0.7a

43.5±2.3a

Table 3 Effect of Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) applications on growth (in terms of dry weight; DW) and yield attributes of pepper plants grown on a heavy metals-contaminated saline soil

Data are means (n = 9 for growth traits) ± SE. The same letters in each column indicate not significant differences according to the LSD test (P≤ 0.05).
Control; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-SA; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-FS; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract, and
MSE-SA + MSE-FS; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract.

Treatments

Total chlorophylls (mg g‒1 DW)

Total carotenoids

Proline

Soluble Sugars

   

(mg g‒1 DW)

(mg g‒1 DW)

(mg g‒1 DW)

2016

       

Control

1.01±0.02d

0.20±0.004c

17.2±0.7d

8.40±1.0d

MSE-SA

1.27±0.04c

0.25±0.003b

19.1±0.2c

10.2±0.2c

MSE-FS

1.40±0.32b

0.26±0.001b

24.6±0.7b

12.7±0.9b

MSE-SA + MSE-FS

1.68±0.03a

0.29±0.001a

30.9±0.2a

15.8±0.2a

2017

       

Control

1.07±0.02c

0.22±0.004c

18.1±0.7d

8.14±0.9d

MSE-SA

1.35±0.04b

0.26±0.003b

20.2±0.2c

9.30±0.3c

MSE-FS

1.46±0.04b

0.27±0.002b

28.8±0.5b

12.9±1.2b

MSE-SA + MSE-FS

1.76±0.03a

0.30±0.001a

32.2±0.2a

15.8±0.2a

Table 4 Effect of Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) applications on leaf contents of photosynthetic pigments, proline and total soluble sugars of pepper plants grown on a heavy metals-contaminated saline soil

Data are means (n = 9 for growth traits) ± SE. The same letters in each column indicate not significant differences according to the LSD test (P≤ 0.05).
Control; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-SA; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-FS; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract, and
MSE-SA + MSE-FS; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract.

Nutrients contents and K+/Na+ ratio

The single (i.e., MSE-SA or MSE-FS) or integrative (i.e., MSE-SA+MSE-FS) treatments significantly increased the contents of N, P, and K+, and the ratio of K+/Na+, while significantly reduced the content of Na+ of pepper plants grown on a heavy metals-contaminated saline soil compared to the control (SA and FS were applied with tap water) (Table 5). Further, the integrative MSE-SA + MSE-FS treatment significantly exceeded the single treatments recording the best results. It increased N content by73 and 69%, P content by 67 and 61%, K+ content by 44 and 50%, and K+/Na+ ratio by121 and 141%, and reducing Na+ content by 35 and 37% in both 2016 and 2017 growing seasons, respectively. These results represent identical trends in both growing seasons. 

Treatments

N%

P%

K+%

Na+%

K+/Na+ratio

2016

         

Control

1.21±0.02d

0.18±0.004c

1.96±0.09d

2.33±0.06a

0.84±0.05d

MSE-SA

1.28±0.03c

0.22±0.003b

2.39±0.02c

1.81±0.03b

1.32±0.03c

MSE-FS

1.66±0.03b

0.23±0.003b

2.61±0.08b

1.62±0.02c

1.61±0.04b

MSE-SA + MSE-FS

2.09±0.03a

0.30±0.010a

2.83±0.04a

1.52±0.03d

1.86±0.01a

2017

         

Control

1.24±0.12d

0.18±0.010c

1.90±0.01d

2.39±0.05a

0.79±0.02d

MSE-SA

1.30±0.04c

0.23±0.007b

2.26±0.12c

1.84±0.10b

1.23±0.01c

MSE-FS

1.68±0.07b

0.23±0.004b

2.66±0.10b

1.72±0.12b

1.55±0.10b

MSE-SA + MSE-FS

2.10±0.09a

0.29±0.003a

2.85±0.05a

1.50±0.07c

1.90±0.08a

Table 5 Effect of Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) applications on leaf contents of nutrients and K+/Na+ ratio of pepper plants grown on heavy metals-contaminated saline soil

Data are means (n = 9) ± SE. The same letters in each column indicate not significant differences according to the LSD test (P≤0.05).
Control; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-SA; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-FS; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract, and
MSE-SA + MSE-FS; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract.

Antioxidant enzymes

The results in Table 6 show analogous trends in 2016 and 2017 growing seasons regarding the activity of antioxidant enzymes in pepper plants grown on heavy metals-contaminated saline soil. The single (i.e., MSE-SA or MSE-FS) or integrative (i.e., MSE-SA+MSE-FS) treatments significantly increased the activities of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione reductase (GR) compared to those of the control (SA and FS were applied with tap water). Moreover, the integrative MSE-SA + MSE-FS treatment significantly exceeded both MSE single treatments and collected the best results. It increased CAT activity by 55 and 55%, POX activity by 135 and 138%, APX activity by 99 and 98%, SOD activity by 54 and 56%, and GR activity by 114 and 112% in both 2016 and 2017 growing seasons, respectively. 

Treatments

CAT

POX

APX

SOD

GR

 

(mM H2O2 g-1 FW)

     

2016

         

Control

40.7±0.8d

0.81±0.01d

36.8±1.1d

4.28±0.12d

20.4±1.0d

MSE-SA

45.7±1.2c

1.03±0.02c

42.0±1.7c

4.46±0.08c

24.6±1.0c

MSE-FS

51.8±0.9b

1.49±0.12b

58.1±1.7b

5.38±0.08b

31.2±1.3b

MSE-SA + MSE-FS

63.0±1.2a

1.90±0.04a

73.3±1.6a

6.59±0.13a

43.7±0.7a

2017

         

Control

41.1±1.0d

0.82±0.02d

37.3±2.1d

4.31±0.04d

20.8±1.5d

MSE-SA

46.1±2.3c

1.04±0.01c

42.3±2.0c

4.79±0.07c

23.9±1.0c

MSE-FS

52.2±1.0b

1.52±0.02b

58.6±2.2b

5.42±0.07b

31.7±1.7b

MSE-SA + MSE-FS

63.5±1.0a

1.95±0.24a

73.7±1.9a

6.74±0.22a

44.1±2.5a

Table 6 Effect of Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) applications on leaf activity of antioxidant enzymes in pepper plants grown on heavy metals-contaminated saline soil

Data are means (n = 3) ± SE. The same letters in each column indicate not significant differences according to the LSD test (P≤0.05).
Control; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-SA; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-FS; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract, and
MSE-SA+MSE-FS; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract.

Heavy metals contents in pepper leaves and fruits

The data in Tables7 and 8 represent similar trends in both 2016 and 2017 growing seasons regarding the contents of the heavy metals; cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), lead (Pb) and nickel (Ni) in leaves and fruits of pepper plants grown on a heavy metals-contaminated saline soil. The single (i.e., MSE-SA or MSE-FS) or integrative (i.e., MSE-SA+MSE-FS) treatments significantly decreased the leaf and fruit contents of Cd, Cu, Pb and Ni compared to those of the controls (SA and FS were applied with tap water). Additionally, the integrative MSE-SA+MSE-FS treatment significantly exceeded both MSE single treatments collecting the best results. It decreased Cd content by 81 and 79% in leaves and 82 and 79% in fruits, Cu content by 51 and 53% in leaves and 52 and 54% in fruits, Pb content by 50 and 52% in leaves and 58 and 58% in fruits, and Ni content by 71 and 69% in leaves and 75 and 67% in fruits in both 2016 and 2017 growing seasons, respectively.

Treatments

Cd(mg kg‒1)

 

Cu(mg kg‒1)

Pb(mg kg‒1)

Ni(mg kg‒1)

2016

         

Control

11.8±0.24a

66.4±1.9a

 

36.6±1.0a

17.2±0.31a

MSE(SA)

4.85±0.10c

43.6±1.6c

 

26.3±0.9c

12.6±0.26c

MSE(FS)

6.80±0.14b

52.7±1.7b

 

30.4±0.8b

14.9±0.40b

MSE(SA)+MSE(FS)

2.29±0.07d

32.5±1.0d

 

18.2±1.0d

4.92±0.77d

2017

         

Control

11.6±0.31a

65.4±0.9a

 

38.0±0.8a

17.6±0.47a

MSE(SA)

4.79±0.13c

42.3±0.7c

 

25.3±0.5c

13.2±0.46c

MSE(FS)

6.02±0.22b

50.1±1.3b

 

30.0±1.0b

15.2±0.75b

MSE(SA)+MSE(FS)

2.43±0.18d

30.8±1.1d

 

18.1±0.8d

5.39±0.30d

Table 7 Effect of Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) applications on heavy metals accumulation in leaves of pepper plants grown on heavy metals-contaminated saline soil

Data are means (n = 3) ± SE. The same letters in each column indicate not significant differences according to the LSD test (P≤0.05).
Control; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-SA; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-FS; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract, and
MSE-SA + MSE-FS; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract.

Treatments

Cd(mg kg‒1)

Cu (mg kg‒1)

 

Pb (mg kg‒1)

Ni (mg kg‒1)

2016

         

Control

8.45±0.21a

47.4±1.0a

26.1±0.5a

 

12.3±0.21a

MSE(SA)

2.75±0.12c

29.0±0.6b

18.8±0.7b

 

8.98±0.12b

MSE(FS)

4.14±0.14b

30.5±0.7b

20.3±0.8b

 

9.19±0.22b

MSE(SA)+MSE(FS)

1.55±0.10d

22.8±0.3c

11.0±0.3c

 

3.09±0.17c

2017

         

Control

8.27±0.11a

46.7±0.9a

26.4±0.2a

 

12.6±0.37a

MSE(SA)

2.65±0.13c

29.5±0.5c

18.1±0.2c

 

9.25±0.16b

MSE(FS)

4.30±0.12b

34.8±0.8b

20.3±0.9b

 

9.49±0.25b

MSE(SA)+MSE(FS)

1.75±0.08d

21.6±0.4d

11.2±0.2d

 

4.19±0.18c

Table 8 Effect of Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) applications on heavy metals accumulation in fruits of pepper plants grown on heavy metals-contaminated saline soil

Data are means (n = 3) ± SE. The same letters in each column indicate not significant differences according to the LSD test (P≤0.05).
Control; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-SA; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with tap water,
MSE-FS; no extracts were added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract, and
MSE-SA + MSE-FS; moringa seed extract was added in irrigation water + foliar spray was done with moringa seed extract.

Discussion

The soil tested in the current study has salinity (EC = 7.73–7.78 dS m‒1) and heavy metals (i.e., Cd, Cu, Pb, and Ni at a concentration of 18.1–18.7, 106–109, 248–253, and 253–259 mg kg‒1 soil, respectively) contamination that cause a severe (doubled) stress to plants (Table 1). This soil caused a reduction in leaf chlorophylls (Table 4) and mineral nutrients (Table 5) and an increase in heavy metals contents (Table 7) & (Table 8), which reflected in a severe decrease in growth and fruit yield of pepper plants (Tables 3). These deleterious effects ascribe to the long persistence of heavy metals in the soil in addition to the osmotic pressure "physiological drought" caused by salt stress, all of which cause extreme toxic effects both on production of crops and on human health due to the human consumption of these crops;43,44 It is well known that the toxicity of heavy metals in the agricultural environment causes extreme toxic effects on plant processes including leaf chlorosis induction,45 root and shoot growth reductions,46 undesirable enzyme activation and inhibition.47 Further, salt stress disorders the metabolic processes, including meristematic activity and cell elongation reductions, connecting with high respiration rate due to high energy requirements, all of which negatively affect plant growth and production.48 The stress causes excess generation of ROS that induces oxidative stress in plants.49 These increased ROS injure chlorophylls, DNA, membrane functions and protein. To repair and alleviate the harms caused by ROS, plants develop their antioxidant defense systems,50 comprising of many enzymatic (i.e., CAT, POD, SOD, APX, GR, etc.) and non-enzymatic low molecular weight (i.e., proline, AsA, GSH, tocopherols, carotenoids, etc.) antioxidants16,21 These developed antioxidant defense systems are not enough, in most cases, to assist plants to cope with the stresses under study, therefore plants need to exogenous support to increase the efficiency of their antioxidant defense systems such as antioxidants- and growth promoting-containing plant extracts, which are proved to stimulate plant defenses effectiveness in this regard.21-24 This study showed that a beneficial use of moringa seed extract (MSE), especially the integrative MSE-SA + MSE-FS (applied as Rhizosphere supplementation with drip irrigation water; SA and as foliar spray; FS) treatment. This integrative MSE-SA+MSE-FS treatment significantly increased plant growth and production and leaf physio-biochemical attributes (Tables 3‒5), and leaf antioxidant enzyme activities (Table 6), and significantly reduced leaf and fruit accumulation of heavy metals (Table 7)  & (Table 8) of salt (EC=7.73–7.78 dS m‒1)- and heavy metal (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Ni)-stressed pepper plants compared to those of the other MSE single treatments and the control (free from the extract). These improvements conferred by the integrative MSE-SA+MSE-FS treatment for pepper plants grown on saline soil contaminated with heavy metal may be attributed to the supplementations of antioxidants, osmoprotectants, phytohormones, and nutrients (Table 2) found in abundant amounts in MSE to pepper plants through their roots and leaves to support the plant antioxidant defense systems to cope with the doubled stress (salinity and heavy metals) under this study. The analysis of MSE as shown in Table 2 indicates that this extract considers as effective bio stimulant for stressed plants. The enhanced pepper growth and yield due to the application of MSE under the doubled stress may be attributed to the improved mobilization of germination and growth-linked metabolites dissolved substances such as mineral nutrients, soluble sugars, antioxidants, and amino acids of MSE that participate in early seed activities and strong plumule growth, positively reflecting in seedling growth51,52 under stress due to the improvements in the activity of antioxidant defense systems (Tables 4‒6). These positive MSE effects, coming from SA, are supported by FS of MSE, conferring positive effects of extract active components, especially GAs and Se to further improve the doubled stressed plant growth, and consequently its production.53,54 By looking at the most important active components of MSE, it has been documented salt or heavy metal stress alleviation by exogenous GAs addition through enhancing plant growth and conferred heavy metal tolerance in microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris) exposed to Cd and Pb.55 They attributed this result to the positive effect of GA3 on the growth, metal bioaccumulation, and biochemical composition of C. vulgaris under stress due to the great effect of GA3 on the basic developmental plant processes. GAs may be increased in plant roots by MSE-SA and in leaves by MSE-FS, perhaps due to enhanced activities of GAs biosynthesis enzymes such as GA20ox and GA3ox,56 contributing to stronger growth to face salt and metal stress conditions. Application of MSE may be maintained an appropriate level of endogenous GAs for stimulated growth in different stages through activation of cell division and elongation, leading to an increase in leaf area along with stay-green effect by cytokinins found in MSE that stimulate plant photosynthetic rate.

Mineral nutrients, as an essential part of MSE (Table 2), are very important for plant growth and development under both normal and stress conditions.9,51 It has been reported that mineral nutrients applications increased metal tolerance capacity of plants and alleviating the metal toxicity by maintain photosynthetic machinery through affecting, positively, the PSII reaction centers and regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, and by decreasing the level of free radical production and lipid peroxidation through stimulating the antioxidant defense systems57-59 These nutrients maintain leaves number on plants to maximize photosynthesis, elevating the sink capacity fulfilled during supply of photo-assimilates from stressed leaves.60 Application of nutrients-containing MSE maximized the number of photosynthetic active leaves and leaves area with staying green (observed; data not shown) to longer time, maintaining chlorophylls in higher contents (Table 4). Presence of GAs and nutrients in MSE inhibits premature leaf senescence and maintains higher leaf area, increasing the efficiency of photosynthetic machinery. In addition, Fe found in MSE may be available in plants after treatment to activate many enzymes involved in pathways of chlorophyll biosynthesis and some antioxidant enzymes such as APOX and GR that scavenge the ROS and protect chlorophyll from degradation.61 K+, as an important nutrient component in MSE, is a major osmo protectant to preserve higher tissue water content and to regulate the stomatal opening/closure controlling photosynthesis rate of plant grown under stress conditions.62,63 Stomatal regulation depends on K+ supplying in the guard cell and leaf apoplast.64 Our results showed that the increase of chlorophyll content by MSE positively reflected in growth and yield characteristics that might be attributed to more assimilations correlated with nutrient elements, GAs, and Se.51,65 that found in the applied MSE to support the antioxidant defense systems of the doubled stressed pepper plants under study.

The undesirable results obtained under the saline soil contaminated with heavy metals were repaired by antioxidants-containing MSE together with stimulating the endogenous antioxidant defense systems against ROS that generate by stress.14 Leaf stomata of stressed plants close, leading to a decrease in CO2 fixation, while electrons transfer and light reaction continue normally. Under such conditions, accepting the electrons by NADP will be limited and so oxygen can act as electrons acceptor, leading to produce more ROS such as 1O2, O2•−, H2O2 and OH radicals that lead to peroxidation of cell membranes and increasing ion leakage and lipid peroxidation.65 Photosynthesis is coupled with transpiration rate of plants, and the transpiration inhibition is a credible and prompt measure of toxic effects of stress.66 Application of osmoprotectants (sugars and proline)-containing MSE helps modify the water imbalance in the plant.44 Therefore; these materials may be included in doubled stressed pepper growth and yield improvements. Proline is also altered in salt + heavy metal-stressed plants by the MSE application. It, as a main component of MSE, contributes to cell osmotic adjustment under stress conditions, with which plants usually accumulate more levels of proline10 and is further accumulated by MSE application (Table 4). Proline accumulation (from 5% of the amino acid pool up to 20–80%) in stressed plants attributes to acclimation to recompense the energy for growth and survival, helping plants to tolerate the stress.67 The mechanisms by which proline reduces the ROS damages and enhances plant tolerance are that proline declines stress by detoxification of ROS overproduced by stress poisoning, in addition to that it may physically quenches 1O2 or reacts directly with OH radicals.68 The increase in proline and other MSE components promoted the antioxidant defense systems of pepper plants (Table 4) & (Table 6) to avoid damages caused by stress.44 Another osmo protectant that was further increased in stressed pepper plants by MSE application, soluble sugars (Table 4) are participated to plant osmotic adjustment.69 and can directly or indirectly modify genes expressions involved in metabolic processes, storage functions, and defense systems.70 Accumulation of soluble sugars might have a physiologically important role in energy supply, osmotic adjustment to maintain leaf water potential and plant water content, and it can reduce cell osmotic potential and increase stress tolerance.71 In addition, Se was found as an important component of MSE (Table 2). It is a constituent of seleno-proteins, and it has many important functions, including energy metabolism and antioxidant protection.72 Supplementation of Se to plants (through applied MSE) may be contributed to improvements of pepper performance (growth and yield) and antioxidant systems activity,73 and the ability to reduce ROS by increasing the antioxidant systems activity.14

The increased accumulations of Na+ and heavy metals (i.e., Cd, Cu, Pb, and Ni) ions together with the reductions in the N, P, and K+ contents, and K+/Na+ ratio in the doubled stressed plants were positively modified by the MSE application (Table 5) & (Table 7). This positive nutrient status of pepper plants mainly due to the nutrient-containing MSE (Table 2) and may be attributed to the antagonistic effects of extract nutrients with heavy metals maintaining membrane health.74,75 Plant nutrient homeostasis depends primarily on the degree of the membrane vector activity, which is involved in the transfer of ions from soil to plant, then regulates its distribution within and between plant cells.76 Membranes can lead to chemical disturbances in stressed-plant cells, reflecting deficiency symptoms of some essential nutrients on plants due to the antagonistic effect of Na+ ion against nutrients (i.e. N, K+, P, and Ca2+).77 In the present study, K+ imbalance in cells cytosols under stress was positively modified by MSE application, therefore, maintaining high concentrations of K+ within the cytosols and maintaining an appropriate K+/ Na+ ratio as a basic mechanism to help plant to tolerate stress.78 The increase in nutrients contents (N, P, and K+) by MSE application may be attributed to that MSE is rich source in mineral nutrients and hormones like GAs, auxins, and zeatin-type cytokinin that increase the metabolic processes including nutrient absorption to increase the nutrients contents in plant tissues.79 at the expense of Na+ and heavy metal ions.

Phytoremediation (i.e., the use of plants) sequester and/or detoxify contaminants and has been reported to be an effective, nonintrusive, inexpensive, aesthetically pleasing and socially accepted technology to remediate contaminated soils. Plants for phytoextraction, i.e. metal removal from soil, should be tolerant to heavy metals with profuse root system, rapid growth rate, and producing reasonably high biomass.80 Plant extract, herein (i.e., MSE), may be considered as an effective tool for Phytoremediation of heavy metals, especially they significantly decreased the accumulation of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Ni in pepper plants (leaves and fruits) when applied through drip irrigation water and foliar spray (Table 7). This reduction in heavy metals accumulation by these extracts may be attributed to the increased efficiency of the antioxidant defense systems (enzymatic and non-enzymatic; (Table 4) & (Table 6) and/or to the increased nutrients (Table 5) that may antagonize heavy metal entry into plants.74,75 Plant generally faces oxidative damages when exposed to heavy metal stress.81 The phyto-potential of plant can be assessed with tolerance mechanism for toxic metal-induced ROS.82 The major ROS scavenging pathways of plants include SOD found in almost all cellular compartments, the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in chloroplasts, the water–water cycle in chloroplasts, and cytosol, GR and CAT found in peroxisomes, mitochondria, apoplast, and peroxisomes.82 In addition, glutathione (GSH), is an important component of MSE, may be involved in heavy metal resistance. It helps to reduce the effect of secondary oxidative stress resulting from the production of ROS,83 and it also constitutes the precursor of phytochelatins, which are small peptides binding to metal accumulating in vacuoles.84 MSE used in this study contains many other antioxidants and vitamins that may have an important role in reducing the heavy metals accumulation in pepper plants. Another mechanism, by which pepper plants had tolerated the doubled stress under study, is antioxidant defense system activity that was increased significantly by MSE to overcome the ROS damages. Antioxidants found in MSE may be translocated into plants through roots (by drip irrigation) and leaves (through foliar spray) to contribute to increase the efficiency of the antioxidant defense systems including non-enzymatic (e.g., proline, AsA, GSH, tocopherols, carotenoids, etc.) and enzymatic (e.g., GR, SOD, CAT, POD, APX, etc.) antioxidants. Among the group of antioxidant enzymes, SOD is considered as the first line of defense against ROS and converts O2•− to H2O2.85 H2O2 is then further scavenged by CAT and APX into H2O and O2.86 In the AsA-GSH cycle, APX reduces H2O2 by using AsA as an electron donor, and the oxidized AsA is then reduced by GSH generated from GSSG that is catalyzed by GR at the expense of NADPH. Therefore, levels of antioxidant enzymes increase when plants are exposed to oxidative stress including salinity.18,20 The regenerating enzymes GR and DHAR as a fundamental part of the Halliwell–Asada cycle, as they formed part of the regeneration of AsA from DHA using GSH as a reducing power are reported.87 The present study reported significant increases in the antioxidant enzymes activity (i.e. CAT, POX, APX, SOD, GR; Table 6) by the integrative MSE-SA+MSE-FS application compared to the controls without MSE. These increases in the activity of antioxidant enzymes as an effective defense system supported stressed plants to tolerate stress and to reduce, significantly, the ROS damages.

Economically, we had used 18kg moringa seeds per hectare for the best treatment; MSE-SA+MSE-FS (5g L‒1× 600 L MSE for each addition through drip irrigation+600 L MSE for each spray per hectare×3 sprays=18kg moringa seeds), this amount of moringa seeds equals approx. 150 USD (18 kg×8.33 USD) as local prices. The best treatment conferred average pepper fruit yield of approx.42 tons per hectare as an average of the two seasons. As local prices of pepper fruits, the 42 tons of fruits equal approx. 12,000 USD. By subtraction the value of the control production (17.3 tons per hectare) from the best treatment production; 12,000–4,800, therefore, we will obtain equal approx. 7,200 USD (minus 150 USD for applied materials) = approx. 7,050 USD earnings per hectare. This with the easy preparation of the MSE for farmers/producers due to that the extraction method requires only alcohol as described in the material and methods section.

Conclusion

Stress tolerance in pepper plants grown on a heavy metal (Cd, Cu, Pb and Ni)-contaminated saline (EC=7.73–7.78 dS m–1) soil was effectively improved by the integrative application of MSE-SA + MSE-FS that provided plants with excess desirable materials (i.e., phytohormones, proline, sugars, ascorbic acid, glutathione, vitamins, selenium and mineral nutrients) for rapid and strong growth to strongly face the doubled stress. The leverage of MSE in alleviating the doubled stress in plants reflecting better growth and yield is found to be due to the improved antioxidant defense systems; non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants (i.e., free proline, TSS, carotenoids, CAT, POD, SOD, APX, and GR) to decline the ROS damages by the addition of minerals-, osmoprotectants-, phytohormones-, Se-, and vitamins-containing MSE applied, especially as integrative additions through drip irrigation and foliar spray, which reported herein as the best integrative treatment. The leverage of MSE is also reported in our study as "stay-green effect" due to MSE active components (i.e., mineral nutrients, phytohormones, soluble sugars, and proline), supporting the anti oxidative defense systems in pepper plants under severe stress.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

The author declares there is no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Howard LR, Talcott ST, Brenes CS, et al. Changes in phytochemical and antioxidant activity of selected pepper cultivars (Capsicum spp.) as influenced by maturity. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48(5):1713–1720.
  2. De Pascale E, Ruggiero C, Barbieri G, et al. Physiological responses of pepper to salinity and drought. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 2003;128:48–54.
  3. Maas EV, Hoffman GJ. Crop Salt Tolerance ‒ Current Assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers. 1977;103(2):115–134.
  4. Maas EV. Salt tolerance of plants. Applied Agricultural Research.1986;1:12–26.
  5. Vodyanitskii Yu N. Standards for the contents of heavy metals in soils of some states. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 2016;14(3):257–263.
  6. Ashfaque F, Inam A, Sahay S, et al. Influence of heavy metal toxicity on plant growth, metabolism and its alleviation by phytoremediation - A promising technology. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International. 2016;6(2):2394‒1073.
  7. Kadkhodaie A, Kelich S, Baghbani A. Effects of salinity levels on heavy metals (cd, pb and ni ) absorption by sunflower and sudangrass plants. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 2012;1(12):47–53.
  8. Maksymiec W. Signaling responses in plants to heavy metal stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2007;29:177–187.
  9. Bargaz A, Nassar RMA, Rady MM, et al. Improved salinity tolerance by phosphorus fertilizer in two Phaseolus vulgaris recombinant inbred lines contrasting in their P-efficiency. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2016;202(6):497–507.
  10. Zhu JK. Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6(2):66–71.
  11. Sheng M, Tang M, Chen H, et al. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza. 2008;18(6-7):287–296.
  12. Baker NR. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:89–113.
  13. Kalaji MH, Pietkiewicz S. Salinity effect in plant growth and other physiological process. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 1993;15:89–124.
  14. Rady MM, Varma BC, Howladar SM. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings overcome NaCl stress as a result of presoaking in Moringa oleifera leaf extract. Scientia Horticulturae. 2013;162:63‒70.
  15. Gul S, Nawaz MF, Azeem M, et al. Interactive effects of salinity and heavy metal stress on ecophysiological responses of two maize (Zea Mays L.) cultivars. FUUAST J BIOL. 2016;6(1):81–87.
  16. Schutzendubel A, Polle A. Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal-induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. J Exp Bot. 2002;53(372):1351–1365.
  17. Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism oxidative stress and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373–399.
  18. Siringam K, Juntawong N, Chaum S, et al. Salt stress induced ion accumulation, ion homeostasis, membrane injury and sugar contents in salt-sensitive rice (Oryza sativa L. spp. indica) roots under isoosmotic conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(8):1340–1346.
  19. Sevengör S, Yasar F, Kusvuran S, et al. The effect of salt stress on growth, chlorophyll content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzymes of pumpkin seedling. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011;6(21):4920–4924.
  20. Rady MM, Taha SS, Kusvuran S. Integrative application of cyanobacteria and antioxidants improves common bean performance under saline conditions. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018;233:61–69.
  21. Semida WM, Rady MM. Presoaking application of propolis and maize grain extracts alleviates salinity stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Scientia Horticulturae. 2014;68:210–217.
  22. Rady MM, Mohamed GF. Modulation of salt stress effects on the growth, physio-chemical attributes and yields of Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants by the combined application of salicylic acid and Moringa oleifera leaf extract. Scientia Horticulturae. 2015;193:105–113.
  23. Desoky EM, Merwad AM, Rady MM. Natural biostimulants improve saline soil characteristics and salt stressed-sorghum performance. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2018;49(8):967‒983.
  24. Rehman H, Alharby HF, Alzahrani Y, et al. Magnesium and organic biostimulant integrative application induces physiological and biochemical changes in sunflower plants and its harvested progeny on sandy soil. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;126:97–105.
  25. Abd El-Mageed TA, Semida WM, Rady MM. Moringa leaf extract as biostimulant improves water use efficiency, physio-biochemical attributes of squash plants under deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 2017;193:46–54.
  26. Black CA. Soil plant relationships. 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, NY, USA; 1968.
  27. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Ic., Englewood Califfs, New Jersy; USA.
  28. Dahnke WC, Whitney DA. Measurement of Soil Salinity. In: Dahnke WC. editor. Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region, 499. North Central Regional Publication 221. North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin.1988;32–34 p.
  29. Chibuike GU, Obiora SC. Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods – a review. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2014; Article ID 752708.
  30. Fadeels AA. Location and properties of chloroplasts and pigment determination in roots. Physiologia Plantarum.1962;15(1):130‒147.
  31. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil. 1973;39(1):205‒207.
  32. Irigoyen JJ, Emerich DW, Sanchez-Diaz M. Water stress induced changes in the concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Plant Physiology. 1992;84(1):455–460.
  33. Wolf B. A comprehensive system of leaf analyses and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 1982;13(12):1035‒1059.
  34. Chapman HD, Pratt FP. Determination of Minerals by Titration Method: Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants, and Water. 2nd ed., Agriculture Division, Calif. Univ., USA:1982;169–170 p.
  35. Watanabe FS, Olsen SR. Test of ascorbic acid method for determine phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings.1965;29(6):677–678.
  36. Lachica M, Aguilar A, Yanez J. Analysis foliar. Métodos utilizados en la Estacion Experimental del Zaidin. Anales de Edafología y Agrobiología. 1973;32:1033‒1047.
  37. Vitoria AP, Lea PJ, Azevado RA. Antioxidant enzymes responses to cadmium in radish tissues. Phytochemistry. 2001;57(57):701‒710.
  38. Chance B, Maehly AC. Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology.1955;2:764‒775.
  39. Thomas RL, Jen JJ, Morr CV. Changes in soluble and bound peroxidase-IAA oxidase during tomato fruit development. Journal of Food Science. 1982;47(1):158‒161.
  40. Fielding JL, Hall JL. A biochemical and cytochemical study of peroxidase activity in roots of Pisum sativum. Journal of Experimental Botany.1978;29(4):969‒981.
  41. Sairam RK, Rao KV, Srivastava GC. Differential response of wheat genotypes to long term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science. 2002;163(5):1037‒1046.
  42. Rao MV, Paliyath G, Ormrod DP. Ultraviolet-B radiation and ozone-induced biochemical changes in the antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol.1996;110(1):125–136.
  43. Farooq MA, Ali S, Hameed A, et al. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity by silicon is related to elevated photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes; suppressed cadmium uptake and oxidative stress in cotton. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;96:242–249.
  44. Zaki SS, Rady MM. Moringa oleifera leaf extract improves growth, physiochemical attributes, antioxidant defense system and yields of salt-stressed Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants. International Journal of Chem Tech Research. 2015;8(11):120‒134.
  45. Wierzbicka M. Resumption of mitotic activity in Allium cepa L. root tips during treatment with lead salts. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 1994;34(2):173‒180.
  46. Fargasová A. Effect of Pb, Cd, Hg, As, and Cr on germination and root growth of Sinapis alba seeds. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.1994;52:452–456.
  47. Van Assche F, Clijsters H. Effects of heavy metals on enzyme activity in plants. Plant, Cell and Environment. 1990;13(3):195–206.
  48. Kaydan D, Yağmur M, Okut N. Effects of salicylic acid on the growth and some physiological characters in salt-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Tarim Bİlimleri Dergisi. 2007;13(2):114–119.
  49. Cheeseman JM. Hydrogen peroxide and plant stress: a challenging relationship. Plant Stress. 2007;1:4–15.
  50. Halliwell B, Gutteridge MJC. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. London: Oxford University Press. 2007.
  51. Yildirim E, Karlidag H, Turan M. Mitigation of salt stress in strawberry by foliar K, Ca and Mg nutrient supply. Plant, Soil and Environ. 2009;55(5):213–221.
  52. Elham N, Alireza P, Hossein Z. Influences of ascorbic acid and gibberellin on alleviation of salt stress in summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.). International Journal of Biosciences. 2014;5(4):245‒255.
  53. Duraid KAA. Alleviation of salinity effects by poultry manure and gibberellin application on growth and peroxidase activity in pepper. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology. 2017;2(4):1851‒1862.
  54. Nossier MI, Gawish M, Taha MTA. Response of wheat plants to application of selenium and humic acid under salt stress conditions. Egypt J Soil Sci. 2017;57(2):175–187.
  55. Falkowska M, Pietryczuk A, Piotrowska A, et al. The Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) on growth, metal biosorption and metabolism of the green algae Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyceae) beijerinck exposed to cadmium and lead stress. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2011;20(1):53–59.
  56. Li W, Yamaguchi S, Khan MA, et al. Roles of gibberellins and abscisic acid in regulating germination of Suaeda salsa dimorphic seeds under salt stress. Front Plant Sci. 2016;6:1235.
  57. Gunes A, Pilbeam DJ, Inal A. Effect of arsenic-phosphorus interaction on arsenic-induced oxidative stress in chickpea plants. Plant and Soil. 2009;314(1-2):211–220.
  58. Gaafar ARZ, Ghdan AA, Siddiqui MH, et al. Influence of sulfur on cadmium (Cd) stress tolerance in Triticum aestivum L. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2012;11(43):10108–10114.
  59. Anayat M, Agnihotri RK, Vamil R, et al. Role of Cd and Hg on biochemical contents of fennel and its reduction by exogenous treatment of nitrogen. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2014;4(3):1–6.
  60. Thomas H, Howarth CJ. Five ways to stay green. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2000;51(suppl_1):329–337.
  61. Zayed BA, Salem AKM, El-Sharkawy HM. Effect of different micronutrient treatments on rice (Oriza sativa L.) growth and yield under saline soil conditions. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011;7(2):179‒184.
  62. Marschner H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd ed., London: Academic Press.1995.
  63. DubeyRS. Photosynthesis in plants under stressful conditions. In: Pessarakli M. editor. Handbook of Photosynthesis, Second ed. CRC Press, New York: 2005;717–718 p.
  64. Shabala S, Schimanski LJ, Koutoulis A. Heterogeneity in bean leaf mesophyll tissue and ion flux profiles: leaf electrophysiological characteristics correlate with the anatomical structure. Ann Bot. 2003;89(2):221–226.
  65. Alireza Y, Aboueshaghi RS, Dehnavi MM, Balouchi H. Effect of micronutrients foliar application on grain qualitative characteristics and some physiological traits of bean (Phaseolusvulgaris L.) under drought stress. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 2014;4(4):124‒131.
  66. Trapp S, Feificova D, Rasmussen NF, et al. Plant uptake of NaCl in relation to enzyme kinetics and toxic effects. Environmental and Experimental Botany.2008;64(1):1–7.
  67. Chandrasekhar KR, Sandhyarani S. Salinity induced chemical changes in Crotalaria striata DC plants. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 1996;1(1):44–48.
  68. Howladar SM. A novel Moringa oleifera leaf extract can mitigate the stress effects of salinity and cadmium in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014;100:69–75.
  69. Hayashi H, Alia, Mustardy L, et al. Murata transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana with the coda gene for choline oxidase: accumulation of glycine betaine and enhanced tolerance to salt and cold stress. Plant J. 1997;12(1):133–142.
  70. Hebers K, Sonnewald V. Altered gene expression: brought about by inter and pathogen interactions. Journal of Plant Research. 1998;111(2):323–328.
  71. Babaeian M, Tavassoli A, Ghanbari A, et al. Effects of foliar micronutrient application on osmotic adjustments, grain yield and yield components in sunflower (Alstar cultivar) under water stress at three stages. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011;6(5):1204‒1208.
  72. Kong L, Wang M, Bi D. Selenium modulates the activities of antioxidant enzymes, osmotic homeostasis and promotes the growth of sorrel seedlings under salt stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 2005;45(2):155‒163.
  73. Xu J, Hu Q. Effect of foliar application of selenium on the antioxidant activity of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of selenium-enriched rice. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(6):1759‒1763.
  74. Srivastava RK, Pandey P, Rajpoot R, et al. Exogenous application of calcium and silica alleviates cadmium toxicity by suppressing oxidative damage in rice seedlings. Protoplasma. 2015;252(4):959–975.
  75. Kováčika J, Dresler S. Calcium availability but not its content modulates metal toxicity in Scenedesmus quadricauda. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;147:664–669.
  76. Epstein E, Bloom AJ. Mineral Nutrition of Plants, Principles and Perspectives. 2nd Ed. Sunderland, MA. Sinauer Associates; 2005.
  77. Grattan SR, Grieve CM. Mineral nutrient acquisition and response of plants grown in saline environments. In: Pessarakli, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker Press Inc., New York.1999; 203‒229 p.
  78. Meloni DA, Martınez CA. Glycinebetaine improves salt tolerance in vinal (Prosopis ruscifolia Griesbach) seedlings. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2009;21(3):233–241.
  79. Ghaloom AA, Faraj MAF. Effect of licorice extract on growth and yield in onion plants CV. Texas Grano. Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal. 2012;4(1):140‒147.
  80. Garbisu C, Hernandez-Allica J, BarrutiaO, et al. Phytoremediation: A technology using green plants to remove contaminants from polluted areas. Rev Environ Health. 2002;17(3):75–90.
  81. Gupta DK, Nicoloso FT, Schetinger MRC, et al. Antioxidant defense mechanism in hydroponically grown Zea mays seedlings under moderate lead stress. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;172(1):479–484.
  82. Bhaduri AM, Fulekar MH. Antioxidant enzyme responses of plants to heavy metal stress. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 2012;11(1):55–69.
  83. Noctor G, Gomez L, Vanacker H, et al. Interactions between biosynthesis, compartmentation and transport in the control of glutathione homeostasis and signaling. J Exp Bot. 2002;53(372):1283–1304.
  84. Cobbett C, Goldsbrough P. Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: Roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:159–182.
  85. Hodges DM, Andrews CJ, Johnson DA, et al. Antioxidant enzyme responses to chilling stress in differentially sensitive inbred maize lines. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1997;48(5):1105–1113.
  86. Anjum SA, Farooq M, Xie XY, et al. Antioxidant defense system and proline accumulation enables hot pepper to perform better under drought. Scientia Horticulturae. 2012;140:66–73.
  87. Foyer CH, Noctor G. Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: signaling: acclimation and practical implications. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;1(4):861‒905.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2018 Desoky, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.