Submit manuscript...
Advances in
eISSN: 2373-6402

Plants & Agriculture Research

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 3

Detection, characterization and in-silico analysis of candidatus phytoplasma australasia associated with phyllody disease of sesame

V Venkataravanappa,1,2 CN Lakshminarayana Reddy,4 M Manjunath,2 Neha S Chauhan,2 M Krishna Reddy3

1Central Horticultural Experimental Station, India
2ivision of Crop Protection, Indian Vegetable Research Institute, India
3Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India
4Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, India

Correspondence: V Venkataravanappa, Scientist (Plant Pathology) Division of Plant pathology Central Horticultural Experimental Station, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research Chettalli- 571248, Kodagu, Karnataka, India

Received: October 20, 2016 | Published: July 6, 2017

Citation: : Venkataravanappa V, Reddy CNL, Manjunath M, et al. Detection, characterization and in-silico analysis of candidatus phytoplasma australasia associated with phyllody disease of sesame. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2017;7(3):288-300. DOI: 10.15406/apar.2017.07.00256

Download PDF

Abstract

Leaf samples from sesame plants exhibiting Phyllody disease were collected from Varanasi and Mirzapur districts of Uttar Pradesh, India during the survey conducted between month of September to December, 2012-14. Incidence of sesame Phyllody in the farmers at different location was ranged from 30-70 percent indicating its prevalence in Uttar Pradesh. The Phytoplasma infection in sesame plants was confirmed by PCR using universal primers of 16s rRNA (R16F2n/R16R2) and SecY gene (SecYF2 and SecYR1) respectively. Amplified 16s rRNA and SecY gene was sequenced and sequence comparisons were made with the available Phytoplasma 16srRNA and SecY gene sequences in NCBI Gen Bank database. The 16srRNA and SecY gene sequence of Phytoplasma in the current study, shared highest nucleotide identity of 97.9-99.9% and 95.8 to 96.3% with subgroup 16Sr II-D the peanut witches’-broom group. A Comprehensive recombination analysis using RDP4 showed the evidence of inter- recombination in F2nR2 and SecY gene fragment of Phytoplasma infecting sesame. The most of the F2nR2 fragment is descended from Ash yellows-[16SrVIII] and Apple proliferation-[16SrX] group. While for SecY gene, most of the part was descended from Peanut witches'-broom- 16SrII-A (GU004331) and aster yellows 16Sr I-A (GU004345). The genetic similarities and the potential threat of this new Phytoplasma belong to 16Sr II-D subgroup of Peanut witches’ broom’ group infecting to sesame in north India are discussed.

Keywords: sesame phyllody, PCR, phytoplasma, 16SII group

Introduction

Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) is one of the most important and ancient oilseed crop grown in India and many parts of the world. Bulk of the world production of sesame is coming from Myanmar, India and China.1 In India, sesame is cultivated in an area of 1.83m ha with production of 0 .757m tonnes and productivity 413.6kg/ha. The productivity is low in India compared to world’s average (464.6kg/ha) and it is far below as compared to Egypt (1200kg/ha) and China (897.7kg/ha).2 Due to its high quality and quantity of oil (53.3%) and protein (25%), it is aptly called as the ‘queen’ of oilseeds.3,4 Sesame seed oil contains antioxidant sesame responsible for its long shelf life and oleic acid.3,4–7 Seeds and oil are used in cooking, salad, margarine and is also used as a raw material for the production of industrial products like insecticides, pharmaceuticals, paints, perfumes, soaps and varnishes.8,9 Sesame is vulnerable to biotic and abiotic stresses resulting considerable yield loss. In India, among biotic stresses, sesame Phyllody, is the most important disease appears in severe form affecting the plants partially or completely and having potential to cause yield loss upto100 per cent.10–12 Typical symptoms of this disease include floral virescens, Phyllody and proliferation of auxiliary shoots. However, sometimes these symptoms are found to be accompanied with yellowing, cracking of seed capsule, germination of seeds in the capsules and dark exudation on the foliage.13 Phytoplasma are phloem inhabiting, wall-less, obligate bacteria belonged to the class Mollicutes of prokaryotes.14,15 These sieve inhabiting pathogens spread in nature by sap sucking leaf hopper viz. Orosius orientalis, Circulifer haematoceps and Neoaliturus haematoceps in persistent manner.12,13,16–20 Phytoplsms are known to infect more than 1000 plant species including many agriculturally important crop species viz. fruits, vegetables, cereals, trees and legumes across the world.2,21–25 In the past, they were poorly understood because of their obligate nature and difficulty in culturing in vitro.26 The utilization of DNA-based methods for detection, characterization and phylogenic grouping based on highly conserved 16S rRNA gene among Phytoplasma provided better understanding of their diversity across the globe.27,28 Species specific and group specific primers to amplify 16SrRNA conserved gene in Phytoplasma were extensively exploited for the detection, identification as well as phylogenetic analysis.14,29,30 Based on the analysis of 16SrRNA sequences, 31 groups and 100 subgroups of diverse Phytoplasma were identified.31 These belong to 16SrI, 16SrII, 16SrV, 16SrVI, 16SrIX, 16SrXI and 16SrXIV groups. Among these, Aster yellows group (16SrI) is alone associated with more than 31 diseases and are reported from north-eastern parts of the country.32 So far, only few Phytoplasma diseases were reported from Eastern, Western and Central parts of India. Classification of distinct Phytoplasma strains below the species level has been based primarily on RFLP analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences. Epidemiological studies of diverse Phytoplasma strains over a period, which are very closely related based on analysis of 16SrRNA gene sequences known to be associated with similar diseases in different cultivars of a given plant species grown in the same or different geographical regions.33–36 Often, such strains cannot be readily differentiated by analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence alone. Therefore, the additional marker is required to permit finer differentiation of closely related strains. One such marker readily differentiate the different strains of Phytoplasma are SecY gene, which encodes a protein translocase subunit. This represents one of the most promising markers for finer differentiation of Phytoplasma strains for delineating biologically and/ or ecologically distinct strains that often cannot be readily resolved by analysis of the 16S rRNA gene alone.37 The present study reports the identification and molecular characterization of Phytoplasma associated with sesame Phyllody from north India based on 16SrRNA and SecY gene sequence analysis.

Materials and methods

Disease survey and sample collection

 Roving survey was conducted during September to December, 2012-14 in Varanasi and Mirzapur districts of Uttar Pradesh, India to know the incidence and severity of Phyllody disease on sesame. During the survey, sesame plants exhibiting diverse symptoms were recorded. Incidence of Phyllody in sesame fields (% of plants with Phyllody symptoms) was estimated by visual inspection of around 1,000 plants in each field, following “W” pattern (crossing the rows). Disease incidence was calculated as the percentage of symptomatic plants to the total number of plants observed. The Phyllody disease samples were collected from the different farmers fields separating with a distance of 10kilomers, between them. A part of the samples was used for DNA isolation and the remaining sample was stored at -80oC for further use. The isolates collected from the different farmers fields were designated as SPP1, SPP2, SPP3 (Varanasi), SPP4, SPP5 and SPP6 (Mirzapur).

DNA extraction and PCR amplification of 16Sr RNA and SecY gene

Total nucleic acids were extracted from the leaf samples collected from both symptomatic and asymptomatic plants using cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method.38 PCR amplification of 1.8kb 16S rRNA gene was carried out using Phytoplasma specific universal primer pair P1/P7.39,40 The Amplicons were re-amplified in the second round PCR reaction using more specific internal primers R16F2n/R16R2 as the procedure described for Nested-PCR with expected product size of 1.2kb.25,39 Further the SecY gene of Phytoplasma was amplified by SecYF2 and SecYR1.37 This proves to be useful for finer differentiation among diverse strains. Amplification was performed with 35 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 94oC, primer annealing for 45s at 55oC and primer extension for 1mints 30s at 72oC, with initial denaturation at 94oC for 3 mins and final extension of 15min at 72 oC. The PCR reactions were carried out in a Gene Amp PCR system 9700 (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) thermo cycler. PCR reactions were carried out in a volume of 25μL containing 100ng of DNA template, 0.5U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, Germany), 2mM MgCl2 (Fermentas, Germany), 0.16mM dNTPs (Fermentas, Germany) and 0.3μM of each primer. PCR products were electrophoreses (1h at 80volts) in 0.8% agarose gel and stained with Ethidium bromide (10mg/mL) in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (pH 8). Gels were visualized in a Gel documentation unit (Alpha InfoTech, USA). The Cyclic conditions and PCR reaction components were same for both direct and Nested-PCR, except the primers.

Cloning of PCR product and sequencing

The amplified products for primer pair P1/P7 (1.8kb size) and SecY gene (1.6kb size) were excised from the gel and purified by Gel extraction kit (Qiagen). The fragments were ligated into the pTZ57R/T vector (Fermentas, Germany) as the manufactures instructions. The vector was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α competent cells (Invitrogen Disservices India Pvt. Ltd. at Bangalore).41 And recombinant clones were identified by restriction end nuclease digestion as well PCR amplification using primer pair R16F2n/R16R2 and SecYF2 and SecYR1 as described above. The selected clones were sequenced with automated sequencing ABI PRISM 3730 (Applied Biosystems) from Amnion Bioscience DNA Sequencing facility, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis

The amplified nested-PCR product of 16S rRNA of six sesame phyllody isolates was digested with restriction enzymes such as AluI, EcoRI Taq1, HaeIII and HhaI42 which are used in finer classification of phytoplasma and their strains. Similarly the PCR amplified SecY gene product was digested with AluI, Taq1, RsaI and HhaI restriction enzymes as described by Lee37 for finer differentiation among diverse strains. The PCR-RFLP pattern of digested 16S rRNA and SecY gene was analyzed through electrophoresis with 2% agarose gel stained with Ethidium bromide (10mg/mL), using 0.5xTBE as running buffer. DNA bands were visualized in a UV transilluminator. PCR-RFLP patterns obtained were compared with previously described patterns.37,42

In-silico RFLP analysis

In-silico restriction analysis of R16F2n/R2 fragment of SPP isolate were performed using iPhyClassifier (http://www.ba.ars. usda.gov/data/ mppl/) software.38 The sequence was digested with 17 different restriction enzymes (AluI, BamHI, BfaI, BstUI (ThaI), DraI, EcoRI, HaeIII, HhaI, HinfI, HpaI, HpaII, KpnI, Sau3AI (MboI), MseI, RsaI, SspI and TaqI) and were plotted in a virtual 3.0% agarose gel. The Phytoplasma were routinely differentiated on the basis of 16S rRNA gene by means of RFLP analysis of nested PCR-amplified R16F2n/R2 fragment using a number of end nuclease restriction enzymes.42 As the RFLP pattern of each Phytoplasma is conserved. The virtual RFLP patterns with the key enzymes that distinguish from previously recognized group/subgroup patterns were made in iPhy Classifier. The virtual RFLP gel patterns of sesame Phytoplasma were compared with 16Sr II group Phytoplasma for finer differentiation from its existing members in the Ca. P. australasia.

Sequence analysis

To assess the taxonomic position of six sesame phyllody phytoplasma isolates, full length 16SrRNA and SecY gene sequence were queried using iPhyClassifier online tool.37,43 Further, sequences were subjected to BLAST, NCBI to search for similar sequences in the database. The related sequences obtained from the database were aligned using Crustal X method implemented in SEAVIEW program44,45 and used for the construction of phylogenetic tree through the neighbour joining method using MEGA 6.01 version software.46 With 1000 bootstrapped replications to estimate evolutionary distances between all pairs of sequences simultaneously. The nucleotide sequence identity matrixes for the sesame phyllody phytoplasma were generated using Bio edit Sequence Alignment Editor (version 5.0.9).46

Detection of recombination events

The phylogenic evidence for recombination was detected by aligning 16Sr RNA and SecY gene nucleotide sequences of different groups of phytoplasma retrieved from database and the sesame isolate (SPP1) using the neighbour-Net method, Splits-Tree version 4.3.47,48 This method depicts the conflicting phylogenetic signals caused by recombination as cycles within unrooted bifurcating trees. Recombination analysis was carried out using Recombination Detection Program (RDP), GENECOV, Boots can, Max Chi, Chimara, Si Scan and 3Seq integrated in RDP4 to detect the recombination break points.49 Default RDP settings with 0.05 P- value cut off throughout and standard Bonferroni correction were used.

Results

Survey for the disease incidence

The survey was conducted two times during the crop growth period, one at flowering stage and another at pod development stage. The sesame Phyllody is very much prevalent in the districts of Varanasi and Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh state of India. The disease incidence was ranged from 30-70 per cent in different farmer’s fields (Table 1). The Phyllody symptoms were observed in the field by visual inspection of around 1,000 plants, following “W” pattern (crossing the rows). During inspection the most common symptoms observed in flowering stage are yellowing, Phyllody (all floral parts into dark green leaf-like structures), floral proliferation, floral virescence, formation of dark exudates on foliage and floral parts. Whereas in case of pod development stage, plants are expressing symptoms of phyllody, seed capsule cracking, shoot apex fascination. The most common symptom observed across the fields are transformation of all floral parts into dark green leaf-like structures with vein clearing in different floral parts. Further, whole inflorescence become twisted, leaves are reduced in size and closely arranged on the top of the stem with very short intermodal length giving appearance of broom (Figure 1a). The places of survey, number fields surveyed, crop stage and disease symptoms observed on sesame plants in different farmer’s fields in Varanasi and Mirzapur districts are given the (Table 1).

No.

Place

No. of Filed Surveyed

Stage
of Crop

Type of Symptoms

Av.% Disease Incidence

PCR

Varanasi district

1

Jayapur

5

Flowering
stage

Phllody, floral proliferation,
dark exudates on foliage and floral parts

30-45

+

2

Jamuni

4

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
floral proliferation

20-30

+

3

Khaira

2

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

35-38

+

4

Pachraho

2

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

15-25

+

5

Marach

6

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
floral proliferation,

35-40

+

6

Churavanpur

4

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

35-40

+

7

Betapur

2

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

26-35

+

8

Muradi

2

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
floral proliferation

15-20

+

9

Parsupur

4

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
floral proliferation

25-30

+

10

Tophapur

2

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

35-45

+

11

Karsara

5

,,

Phllody, yellowing,floral proliferation,
dark exudates on foliage and floral parts

25-30

+

12

Patewa

3

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
floral proliferation

15-20

+

13

Hariharpur

3

Pod
stage

Phllody, capsule cracking,
Shoot apex fasciation

30-35

+

14

Niyashipur

4

,,

Phllody, capsule cracking,

35-40

+

15

Rajapur

5

,,

Phllody, capsule cracking,
Shoot apex fasciation

30-35

+

16

Tarapur

6

,,

Phllody,
capsule cracking

25-30

+

17

kachariya

5

,,

Phllody,
capsule cracking

30-35

+

18

Madhopur

2

,,

Phllody, capsule cracking,
Shoot apex fasciation

25-30

+

19

Badoni

2

,,

Phllody,
capsule cracking

25-30

+

20

Mathaldae

8

Flowing
stage

Phllody, yellowing,
floral proliferation,

15-20

+

21

Babatpur

5

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
floral proliferation,

45-50

+

22

Mohansari

4

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

35-45

+

23

Nakkupur

2

,,

Phllody,
Floral virescence

40-45

+

24

Kurhuan

3

,,

Phllody,
Floral virescence

25-30

+

25

Bachhaw

3

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

15-20

+

26

Baharapur

3

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
floral virescence

25-30

+

27

Kadichak

5

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
Floral virescence

35-45

+

28

Khagrajpur

2

,,

Phllody,
Floral virescence

25-30

+

29

Dhadorpur

1

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark exudates
on foliage and floral parts

15-20

+

30

Kanthipur

2

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

30-35

+

31

Rajapur

3

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
Floral virescence

35-40

+

32

Belawan

5

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

30-35

+

33

Sihorawan

3

,,

Phllody,
Floral virescence

25-30

+

34

Baburampua

4

,,

Phllody,
Floral virescence

30-35

+

35

Paniara

2

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

25-30

+

36

Koelipur

5

,,

Phllody, yellowing,
Floral virescence

25-30

+

37

Gotawan

2

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

15-Oct

+

38

Akelwa

3

,,

Phllody,
Floral virescence

15-20

+

39

Aahim

2

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

15-Oct

+

40

Bandhawan

2

,,

Phllody,
Floral virescence

15-Oct

+

41

Duhae

1

,,

Phllody, floral proliferation, dark
exudates on foliage and floral parts

20-25

+

Table 1 Survey for sesame phyllody in different location of Varanasi and Mirzapur in Uttar Pradesh

Figure 1 Over view of sesame filed showing phyllody symptoms under natural conditions.

Detection of phytoplasma

All the six sesame phyllody samples collected from different farmers’ fields gave positive amplification in PCR for the universal primer pair P1/P7.40,50 Followed by nested PCR with R16F2n/R225,39 primers confirming the association of phytoplasma with them. No amplification was obtained from the non-symptomatic samples (Data not shown). The amplification with primer pair P1/P7 may result in no amplification or weak amplification. In order to rule out this error, the Nested- PCR was done to further confirm amplification (positive/negative) by direct PCR. Further, all the six samples gave amplification to primer pair SecYF2/SecYR1 designed to amplify the SecY gene of phytoplasma (approx. size 1.6 kbp). The amplified (for both primer pair P1/P7 and SecYF2/SecYR1) PCR products (1.8kb and 1.6kb) from six infected sesame samples were cloned and sequenced. The 16srRNA and SecY gene sequences of all the six isolates were found identical. Hence, one (SPP1) representative sequence of sesame isolates in the present study was deposited in the Gen Bank [Accession No: KF700083 (16srRNA), KT970076 (SecY gene)].

Sesame phyllody phytoplasma 16SrRNA and SecY gene sequence analysis

The isolate from Uttar Pradesh SPP1 sequence obtained in the current study was compared with 16SrRNA gene sequence of selected 62 known phytoplasma belonging to different groups and subgroups available the database. The sequence of SPP1 isolate shared nucleotide identity from 97.9 to 99.9% with sesame phyllody phytoplasma belongs to 16SrII peanut witches’-broom group (Table 1a). Within this group, it shared highest homology (99.5 to 99.9 %) with 16S rRNA sequence of sesame phyllody phytoplasma (KF322278, KF322275, KF322277, KF322279, KF429485, KF322273, KF322274 and AB690308) from Indian subcontinent, Chickpea phyllody-16SrII-D (FJ870549), Ca.P.australasia-16Sr II-D (Y10097) from Australia, Peanut witches-broom- 16Sr II-A(L33765) from Taiwan. Comparison of sesame phyllody within the subgroup of 16Sr II showed, nucleotide identity of 97.9 to 98.5% with Tomato witches-broom 16Sr II-D(HM584815), Picris echiodes phyllody- 16Sr 11-E (Y16393), Cactus witches-broom [EU099552 (16Sr II-J), EU099546 (16Sr II-L), EU099568 (16Sr II-G), EU099556 (16Sr II-F), EU099572 (16Sr II-K), EU099569(16Sr II-H), EU099551(16Sr II-I)], Crotalaria phyllody- 16Sr II-C (EF193355), Ca.P.aurantifolia- 16Sr II-B (U15442) of the 16Sr II Peanut WB group (Table 1b). The current classification criteria for phytoplasma based on16Sr RNA sequencing placed the Phytoplasma isolates as subgroups which share nucleotide identity of 94-100 percent and isolates as groups which share 80 and above per cent.25 The 16SrRNA gene sequence of Phytoplasma in the present study shares nucleotide identity of more than 94 per cent with members of peanut witches’-broom group (16Sr II), therefore it may be regarded as a member of peanut witches’-broom group (16Sr II). Similarly, the analysis of SecY gene showed that, the current isolate share nucleotide sequence identity between members of different Phytoplasma groups from 30.2 to 96.2% (Table 2 & 3). Further comparison of SecY gene of SPP1 isolate with members of different subgroups group of 16Sr II available in the database revealed highest nucleotide identity of 95.8 to 96.3% with sesame Phyllody (GU004362, AB703253) and Australian tomato big bud-16Sr II-D (GU004347) and lowest identity of 66.2 to 84.7% with Soybean Phyllody (GU004324), Picris echinoids (GU004348) Peanut witches-broom (GU004331) and Sesame Phyllody (GU004322). This indicates, the SecY gene isolated from sesame phyllody SPP1isolate belong to the subgroup 16Sr II-D and is more informative molecular tool for classification of closely related phytoplasma strains.

Phytoplasma Species

Sub-Group

Accession No.

Country

Sesame phyllody -Pali-Rajasthan

16SrII

KF429485

India

Sesame phyllody - Kheda-2 Gujarat

16SrII

KF322274

India

Sesame phyllody - Kheda-1 Gujarat

16SrII

KF322273

India

Sesame phyllody -TKG-N32

16SrII

KF322277

India

Sesame phyllody – Meiktila

16SrII

AB690308

Myanmar

Sesame phyllody -TKG-431

16SrII

KF322278

India

Sesame phyllody - TKG-421

16SrII

KF322275

India

Sesame phyllody - Kushinagar-2 UP

16SrII

KC920748

India

Sesame phyllody - TKG-307

16SrII

KF322279

India

Sesame phyllody -TKG-JTS

16SrII

KF322276

India

Tomato witches-broom

16SrII-D

HM584815

Saudi Arabia

Ca. P. aurantifolia

16SrII-B

U15442

Oman

Peanut witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-A

L33765

Taiwan

Ca.P. austrlasia

16SrII-D

Y10097

Australia

Crotalaria phyllody phytoplasma

16SrII-C

EF193355

Thailand

Cactus witches'-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-G

EU099568

China

Cactus witches'-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-F

EU099556

China

Cactus witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-H

EU099569

China

Cactus witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-I

EU099551

China

Cactus witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-J

EU099552

China

Cactus witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-K

EU099572

China

Cactus witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-L

EU099546

China

Picris echiodes phyllody phytoplasma

16Sr11-E

Y16393

Italy

Ca.P.fraxini

16SrVII

AF092209

USA

Ca.P.ulmi

16SrV

AY197655

USA

Ca.P.palmae

16SrVIII

U18747

USA

Ca.P.cynodontis

16SrXIV

AJ550984

Italy

Ca.P.phoenicium

16SrIX

AF515636

Lebanon

Ca.P.pruni

16SrIII

L04682

USA

Ca.P.mali

16SrX

AJ542541

Italy

Ca.P.asteris

16SrI

M30790

Michigan

Ca.P.australiense

16SrXIII

L76865

Australia

Pigeon pea witches’-broom

16SrIX

AF248957

USA

Ash yellows

16SrVIII

AF189215

USA: New York

Ca.P.braziliense

16SrXV

AF105315

USA

Apple proliferation

16SrX

AF248958

Italy

Chickpea phyllody

16SrII

FJ870549

Pakistan Faisalabad

Clover phyllody

16SrI

AF222065

Canada

Cactus witches'-broom

16SrII

AJ293216

China

Clover yellow edge

16SrIII

AF189288

USA:Oregon

Coconut lethal yellowing phytoplasma

16SrIV

AF498307

Jamaica

Ca.P.trifolii

16SrVI

AY390261

Canada

Fragaria multicipita phytoplasma

16VI-G

AF190225

Canada

Ca.P.luffae

16SrVIII

AF353090

Taiwan

Ca.P.oryzae

16SrXI

AB052873

Thailand

Ca.P.solani

16SrXII

AJ964960

Spain

Periwinkle virescence

16SrXIII

AF248960

Mexican

Ca.P.brasiliense

16SrXV

AF147708

USA

Ca.P. graminis

16SrXV1

AY725228

Cuba

Ca.P. caricae

16SrXVII

AY725234

Cuba

Ca.P. americanum

16SrXVIII

DQ174122

USA

Ca.P. castaneae

16SrXIX

AB054986

South Korea

Ca.P. rhamni

16SrXX

X76431

Europe

Ca. P.pini

16SrXXI

AJ632155

Spain

Phytoplasma sp. strain

16SrXXII

Y14175

Nigeria

Grapevine yellows

16SrXXIII

AY083605

Australia

Sorghum bunchy shoot phytoplasma

16SrXIV

AF509322

Australia

Tea witches broom

16SrXXV

AF521672

Australia

Sugarcane phytoplasmaD3T1

16SrXXVI

AJ539179

Mauritius

Sugarcane phytoplasmaD3T2

16SrXXVII

AJ539180

Mauritius

Der bid phytoplasma

(16SrXXVIII

AY744945

Cuba

Ca.P. malaysianum

(16SrXXXII-A

EU371934

Malaysia

Table 1a 16srDNA Sequences of Phytoplasma employed in analysis

Phytoplasma Species

Sub-group

Accession No.

Country

Sesame phyllody phytoplasma

16SrII

GU004322

Thailand

Sesame phyllody phytoplasma

16SrII

GU004362

Thailand

Sesame phyllody phytoplasma

16SrII

AB703253

Myanmar

Brinjal little leaf phytoplasma

16SrVI-D

GU004356

India

Potato witches’-broom phytoplasma

16SrVI-A

GU004316

Canada

Clover phyllody phytoplasma

16SrVI-A

GU004315

Canada

Potato purple top phytoplasma -AK

16SrVI-A

GU004343

Alaska, USA

Lucerne virescence phytoplasma

16SrVI-A

GU004318

France

Vinca virescence phytoplasma

16SrVI-A

GU004317

California, USA

Potato purple top phytoplasma -AK

16SrVI-A

GU004344

Alaska, USA

Potato purple top phytoplasma -AK

16SrVI-A

GU004342

Alaska, USA

Potato purple top phytoplasma -AK

16SrVI-A

GU004351

Alaska, USA

Dry bean phyllody phytoplasma

16SrVI-A

GU004352

Washington, USA

Dry bean phyllody phytoplasma

16SrVI-A

GU004353

Washington, USA

Ash yellows phytoplasma

16SrVI-A

GU004329

New York, USA

Milkweed yellows phytoplasma

16SrIII-F

GU004340

New York, USA

Potato purple top phytoplasma-MT

16SrIII-M

GU004333

Montana, USA

Clover yellow edge phytoplasma

16SrIII-B

GU004332

Lithuania

Spirea stunt phytoplasma

16SrIII-E

GU004326

New York, USA

Poinsettia branch-inducing phytoplasma

16SrIII-H

GU004328

USA

Peach X-disease phytoplasma

16SrIII-A

GU004327

Canada

Walnut witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrIII-G

GU004325

Georgia, USA

Apple proliferation phytoplasma

16SrX-A

GU004335

Italy

Mexican periwinkle virescence phytoplasma

16SrXIII-A

GU004336

Mexico

Tomato big bud phytoplasma

16SrI-A

AY803178

Arkansas, USA

Chrysanthemum yellows phytoplasma

16SrI-A

AY803170

Germany

Hydrangea phyllody phytoplasma

16SrI-A

AY803181

Belgium

Chrysanthemum yellows phytoplasma

16SrI-B

DQ787851

Italy

Primrose virescence phytoplasma

16SrI-B

AY803176

Germany

Clover phyllody phytoplasma

16SrI-C

AY803183

Germany

Paulownia witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrI-D

AY803184

Taiwan

Blueberry stunt phytoplasma

16SrI-E

AY803169

Michigan, USA

Apricot chlorotic leaf roll phytoplasma

16SrI-F

AY803166

Spain

Strawberry multiplier phytoplasma

16SrI-K

AY803180

Florida, USA

Aster yellows phytoplasma

16SrI-M

AY803168

Germany

Ipomoea witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrI-N

AY803182

Taiwan

Peanut witches-broom phytoplasma

16SrII-A

GU004331

Taiwan

Soybean phyllody phytoplasma

16SrII-C

GU004324

Thailand

Picris echioides phytoplasma

16SrII-E

GU004348

Italy

Australian tomato big bud phytoplasma

16SrII-D

GU004347

Australia

Elm yellows phytoplasma

16SrV-A

AY197690

New York, USA

Cherry lethal yellows phytoplasma

16SrV-B

AY197693

China

Alder yellows phytoplasma

16SrV-C

AY197692

Germany

Flavescence doree phytoplasma

16SrV-D

AY197685

Italy

Rubus stunt phytoplasma

16SrV-E

AY197696

Italy

American potato purple top wilt phytoplasma

16SrXVIII-B

GU004338

Nebraska, USA

Stolbur-It phytoplasma

16SrXII-A

GU004355

Italy

Pear declinev phytoplasma

16SrX-C

GU004363

Italy

Coconut lethal yellows phytoplasma

16SrIV-A

GU004320

USA

Candidatus Phytoplasma fraxini

16SrVII-A

GU004329

USA

Table 1b SecY gene sequences of different phytoplasma employed in analysis

Table 2 Analysis of the sequence similarities among the 16SrRNA gene sequences from the Phytoplasma grouped in the group 16SrII available in database

The species are indicated as SPP: Sesame Phyllody Phytoplasma; Ca WB: Cactus Witches-Broom Phytoplasma; CrP: Crotalaria Phyllody; PnWB: Peanut Witches-Broom Phytoplasma; chiPPP: Chickpea Phyllody Phytoplasma; PEY: Picris Echiodes Phyllody Phytoplasma; To WB: Tomato witches-broom

Table 3 Analysis of the sequence similarities among the SecY gene sequences from the Phytoplasma grouped in the group 16SrII available in database

Phylogenetic analysis of 16SrRNA and SecY gene sequence analysis

The phylogenetic tree was generated by comparing the isolate SPP1 16SrRNA gene sequence characterized in the present study with other selected 62 phytoplasmas belongs to different groups and subgroups infecting different hosts sequences, which are available in the Gen Bank database (Figure 1). The pairwise similarity analyses showed that the newly characterised isolate SPP1 is grouped with previously identified sesame phyllody (KF429485, KF322273, KF322274 and AB690308), Tomato witches-broom 16Sr II-D (HM584815), Chickpea phyllody-16Sr II-D (FJ870549), Peanut witches-broom- 16Sr II-A (L33765) and Ca.P.austrlasia-16Sr II-D (Y10097) belonged to the members of peanut witches’-broom group (16SrII) infecting different crops in Indian subcontinents, Australia and Saudi Arabia (Figure 2a). The analysis showed Indian sesame infecting phytoplasma form a monophyletic cluster with Asian-Australasian- Saudi Arabia origin phytoplasma and established the close relationship between 16SrII-A and 16SrII-D. The analysis also showed that the oligo nucleotide sequences complementary to unique regions of the 16SrRNA 5’-TAAAAGGCATCTTTTATC- 3’ and 5’-CAAGGAAGAAAAGCAAATGGCG AACCATTTGTTT-3’ of isolate SPP1 phytoplasma was similar to the16SrII peanut witches’-broom group. The similarly, phylogenetic tree was generated by comparing the isolate SPP1 SecY gene with other 51 phytoplasma infecting different host are belongs to different groups and subgroups (Figure 1). The results revealed that, the SecY gene of isolate SPP1 is more closely clustered with sesame phyllody (GU004362, AB703253), Australian tomato big bud-16Sr II-D (GU004347) and Peanut witches-broom16Sr II-A (GU004331) belongs to group of 16Sr II (Figure 2b). The analysis showed Indian sesame infecting phytoplasma form a monophyletic cluster with Asian-Australasian origin phytoplasma and established the close relationship between 16Sr II-A and 16Sr II-D.

Figure 2a Phylogenetic trees based on sequences of 16SrRNA (a) and SecY gene (b) from sesame phyllody Phytoplasma isolate SPP1 with other Phytoplasma strains using Neighbor-joining algorithm. Horizontal distances are proportional to sequence distances, vertical distances are arbitrary. The trees are unrooted. A bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was performed and the bootstrap percent values more than 50 are numbered along branches.

Figure 2b SECY phylogeny.

In-silico RFLP analysis

Analysis of the isolate SPP1 sequence with online tool iPhyClassifier indicated that the virtual RFLP pattern derived from the query of F2nR2 fragment of 16S rDNA sequence was identical (similarity coefficient 1.00) to the reference pattern of 16Sr group II and subgroup D (Gen Bank accession: Y10097, Ca. P. australasia-16SrII-D). The analysis further confirmed that Phytoplasma isolate SPP1 from sesame is belongs to 16Sr group II and subgroup16SrII-D.

RFLP analysis of 16SrRNA and SecY gene

The PCR amplified F2nR2 and SecY gene fragments of sesame phyllody isolates (SPP1, SPP2, SPP3, SPP4, SPP5 and SPP6) were digested with restriction endo nucleases, which are used in classification of phytoplasmas.37,42,50 The restriction patterns of samples collected from different farmers fields were similar indicating the phytoplasma associated with sesame in different places of Varanasi and Mirzapur were identical and belongs to the peanut witches’-broom group (16Sr II) (Figure 3a & 3b).

Figure 3a 16sRNA, Restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) patterns of 16S rRNA (a) and SecY gene (b) from Indian sesame Phytoplasma isolates amplified by PCR using primers R16F2/R16R2 and SecYF2/SecYR1. DNA products were digested with restriction end nucleases AluI, EcoRI Taq1, HaeIII and HhaI for 16S rDNA and AluI, Taq1, RsaI and HhaI for SecY gene. Lane M: Molecular marker 1kb ladder; lane1, SPP1; lane 2, SPP2; lane 3, SPP3; lane 4, SPP4; lane 5, SPP5; lane 6, SPP6.

Figure 3b Neighbor-Net generated for the 16SrRNA (a) and SecY gene (b) of phytoplasma isolate SPP1 from sesame plant with other Phytoplasma strains has shown significant signals for phylogenic conflict indicatingas recombinant Phytoplasma.

Neighbor-net and recombination analysis of 16S rRNA and SecY gene of sesame phyllody

The neighbor-net analysis was carried out by aligned sequences of 16S rRNA and SecY gene of diverse groups phytoplasmas31,37 along with the 16S rRNA and SecY gene of isolate SPP1 using split tree program. The results revealed the extensive network of evolution in 16Sr II group/subgroups and SecY gene with other groups of phytoplasma indicating recombination in 16S rRNA and SecY gene of sesame phyllody phytoplasma, The split decomposition analysis showed a “rectangular” network structure suggesting sesame phytoplasma belong to 16SrII group/subgroupsand distinct from all other groups of phytoplasma. Bifurcation between sesame Phytoplasma belong 16Sr II group/subgroupsand other groups of phytoplasma in the split graph were similar to that of phylogenetic analysis. A comprehensive analysis of recombination using RDP3 based on the alignment of sequences of 16Sr II group/subgroups of Phytoplasma and other groups of Phytoplasma available in the database was carried out. The analyses revealed the evidence for inter species recombination in isolate SPP1 infecting sesame reported here with most of the part of the 16SrRNA F2nR2 fragment 414- 1643nt (P-value=9.518X10-26) was descended from Ash yellows-[16Sr VIII] (AF189215) and Apple proliferation-[16Sr X] (AF248958). In case of SecY gene, most of the part 1663- 23nt (P-value=2.748X10-17) was descended from Peanut witches'-broom- 16Sr II-A (GU004331) and aster yellows 16Sr I-A (GU004345) to emerge as a new strain of sesame phytoplasma.

Discussion

Phytoplasma diseases are major production constraints of economically important field crops, oilseed, vegetables, fruit crops, ornamental plants, timber and shade trees.16 Their incidence is increasing day by day with novel symptomatology, uncertain etiology and diseases with diverse geographic distribution in the recent years.51 Incidence of the phtytoplasma diseases reported from the different parts of world suggests their ubiquitous presence.12,13,20,52,53 In India, the symptomatology of sesame phyllody dates back to several decades.54 However, identification of the exact species associated with that was lacking. Recently, it was identified as Ca. P. asteris (16Sr I group) by Klein.55 The current study revealed the presence of sesame Phytoplasma in the north-eastern parts of Uttar Pradesh, India with a considerable amount of incidence (35-50%) resulting in economic loss of the crop. Different detection tools based on nucleic acid such as PCR and N-PCR were available for the detection of Phytoplasma worldwide.13,55 And were employed in the management of the diseases. There was no difference between the incidences of Phytoplasma recorded based the symptoms observed in the field and molecular detection collected samples for by PCR. Phyllody causing Phytoplasma in several crops evolved independently and resulted in different groups. Worldwide, Phyllody disease in sesame was reported to be caused by three distinct phytoplasma groups viz. aster yellows, peanut witches’ broom and clover proliferation group.19,31,56 Some of the species most prevalent are Ca. P. asteris (16Sr I -B) from Myanmar.56 Peanut witches’ broom subgroup (16Sr II-D) from Pakistan and Oman.30,57 Peanut witches’ broom subgroup (16Sr II-A) from Thailand,19 Ca. P. trifolii’ subgroup (16Sr VI-A) from Turkey.19 In the present investigation, we have identified and classified Phytoplasma infecting sesame in north- eastern based on16SrRNA gene sequence and In-silico restriction analysis using iPhyClassifier online tools.43 The evidence suggests that, Phytoplasma SPP1 isolate causing sesame phyllody in north- eastern India is a member of 16Sr II-D subgroup belongs to the Peanut witches’ broom group. Further, the strain of phytoplasma associated with sesame in Varanasi and Mirzapur was identified by digestion of F2n/R2 fragment using five restriction enzymes42 And four restriction enzymes for SecY gene37 Those are used in the classification of Phytoplasma into groups and subgroups. The restriction pattern of Phytoplasma samples collected from different fields was identical, which indicates that, the same Phytoplasma is responsible for causing Phyllody in different locations. The RFLP patterns of every Phytoplasma is conserved, unknown Phytoplasma were identified by comparing the patterns of the unknown with the available RFLP patterns for known Phytoplasma without co-analyses of all reference representative Phytoplasma.42,58 It provides a reliable means for the differentiation of broad array of Phytoplasma and has become the most comprehensive and widely accepted Phytoplasma classification system.51 Recombination plays a significant role in creating genetic diversity within prokaryotic and eukaryotic virus populations.46,59

The most of the part of the 16SrRNA F2nR2 fragment of sesame Phytoplasma isolate SPP1 infecting sesame was known to be descended through inter species recombination with Ash yellows-[16Sr VIII] (AF189215) and Apple proliferation-[16Sr X] (AF248958) in 16sRNA. Whereas in case of SecY gene, most of the part is descended from Peanut witches'-broom- 16Sr II-A (GU004331) and aster yellows 16Sr I-A (GU004345) to emerge as a new strain of sesame Phytoplasma. Similarly, EC-DNA isolated from wild-type line (OY-W) and mild-symptom line (OY-M) of onion yellows Phytoplasma has encoded a geminivirus like Rep and a putative single-stranded-DNA-binding protein (SSB). The EC-DNA of wild-type line (OY-W) and mild-symptom line (OY-M) have intermolecular recombination between EC-DNAs in Phytoplasma.60 Recombination in extra-chromosomal DNA (EC-DNA) plays a major role in creating genetic diversity in Phytoplasma and provides the potential for rapid adaptation to new environmental conditions. This report added one more member of 16Sr IID subgroup from Peanut witches’ broom group in addition to, two Phytoplasma strains belonging Ca. P. asteris (16Sr I group) are responsible for causing sesame Phyllody in India. Further, the member of this Phytoplasma subgroup infecting chickpea have been identified in India and Pakistan.57,61–63 This clearly revealing the rapid expansion of host range by Phytoplasma belonged to 16SrII subgroup.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Director of Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore and Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, for providing research facilities and his keen interest in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO. Agricultural data. In Agricultural Statistics databases. Italy: Organization of the United Nations; 2012.
  2. Sridhar D, Patil MS, Palakshappa MG. Survey for sesamum phyllody disease in Northern Karnataka. Karnataka Journal Agriculture Science. 2013;26(2):320–321.
  3. Uzun B, Arslan C, Furat S. Variation in fatty acid compositions, oil content and oil yield in a germplasm collection of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 2008;85(12):1135–1142.
  4. Uzun B, Arslan C, Karhan M, et al. Fat and fatty acids of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) in comparison to sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Food Chemistry. 2007;102:45–49.
  5. Yoshida H, Takagi S. Effects of seed roasting temperature and time on the quality characteristics of sesame oil. Journal Food Science. 1997;75(1):19–26.
  6. Moazzami AA, Kamal–Eldin A. Sesame seed is a rich source of dietary lignans. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 2006;83:719–723.
  7. Erbas M, Sekerci H, Gul S, et al. Changes in total antioxidant capacity of sesame (Sesamum sp.) by variety. Asian Journal Chemistry. 2009;21(7):5549–5555.
  8. Jin UH, Lee JW, Chung YS, et al. Characterization and temporal expression of a ω–6 fatty acid desaturase cDNA from sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) seeds. Plant Science. 2001;161:935–941.
  9. Wang L, Zhang Y, Li P, et al. Variation of sesamin and sesamolin contents in sesame cultivars from china. Pakistan Journal Botany. 2013;45(1):177–182.
  10. Sahambi HS. Studies on Sesamum phyllody virus:virus vector relationship and host range. In: plant disease problems, Proc. The First International Symposium. Plant Pathology, India: IARI; 1970. p. 340–351.
  11. Kumar P, Mishra. Diseases of sesamum indicum in Rohikhand:intensity and yield loss. Indian Phytopathology. 1992;45(1):121–122.
  12. Salehi M, Izadpanah K. Etiology and transmission of sesame phyllody in Iran. Journal Phytopathology. 1992;135(1):37–47.
  13. Akhtar K, Sarwar G, Dickson M, et al. Sesame Phyllody disease:Its symptomatology, etiology and transmission in Pakistan. Turk J Agric For. 2009;33:477–486.
  14. Seemuller E, Marcone C, Lauer U, et al. Current status of molecular classification of the phytoplasmas. Journal Plant Pathology. 1998;80(1):3–26.
  15. Bertaccini A. Phytoplasma:diversity, taxonomy, and epidemiology. Front Biosci. 2007;12:673–689.
  16. Lee IM, Davis RE, Gundersen–Rindal DE. Phytoplasma:phytopathogenic mollicutes. Annu Rev Microbio. 2000;54:221–255.
  17. Hogenhout SA, Oshima K, Ammar el–D, et al. Phytoplasma: bacteria that manipulate plants and insects. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2008;9(4):403–423.
  18. Esmailzadeh–Hosseini SA, Mirzaie A, Jafari–Nodooshan A, et al. The first report of transmission of a Phytoplasma associated with sesame phyllody by Orosius albicinctus in Iran. Australas Plant Disease Notes. 2007;2:33–34.
  19. Sertkaya G, Martini M, Musetti R, et al. Detection and molecular characterization of phytoplasmas infecting sesame and solanaceous crops in Turkey. Bulletin of Insectology. 2007;60(2):141–142.
  20. Kersting U. Symptomatology, etiology and transmission of sesame phyllody in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology. 1993;22:47–54.
  21. Iftikhar S, Fahmeed F. Detection of phytoplasma from diseased potato sample. Pak J Bot. 2011;43(3):1799–1800.
  22. Akhtar KP, Sarwar G, Sarwar N, et al. Field Evaluation of Sesame Germplasm against Sesame Phyllody Disease. Pakistan Journal Botany. 2013;45(3):1085–1090.
  23. Kaminska M, Berniak H, Obdrzalek J. New natural host plants of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pini’ in Poland and the Czech Republic. Plant Pathology. 2011;60(6):1023–1029.
  24. Chaturvedi Y, Rao GP, Tewari AK, et al. Phytoplasma in ornamentals:detection, diversity and management. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica. 2010;45:31–69.
  25. Seruga M, Skoric DS, Botti S, et al. Molecular characterization of a phytoplasma from the aster yellows (16SrI) group naturally infecting Populus nigra L. Italica trees in Croatia. Forest Pathology. 2003;33(2):113–125.
  26. Rao GP, Mall S, Raj SK, et al. Phytoplasma disease affecting various plant species in India. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica. 2011;46:59–99.
  27. Lee IM, Hammond RW, Davis RE, et al. Universal amplification and analysis of pathogen 16S rDNA for classification and identification of mycoplasma like organisms. Phytopathology. 1993;83(8):834–842.
  28. Bhat AI, Madhubala R, Hareesh PS, et al. Detection and characterization of the Phytoplasma associated with a Phyllody disease of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) in India. Scientia Horticulture. 2006;107(2):200–204.
  29. Lee IM, Davis RE, Gundersen–Rindal DE. Phytoplasma:phytopathogenic mollicutes. Annu Rev Microbio. 2000;54:221–255.
  30. Marcone C, Lee IM, Davis RE, et al. Classification of aster yellows–group phytoplasmas based on combined analyses of rRNA and tuf gene sequences. International Journal of Systematic & Evolutionary Microbiology. 2000;50(5):1703–1713.
  31. Hodgetts J, Ball T, Boonham N, et al. Use of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) for identification of phytoplasmas in plants. Plant Pathology. 2007;56(3):357–365.
  32. Al–Sakeiti MA, Al–Subhi AM, Al–Saady NA, et al. First report of witches’ broom disease of sesame (Sesamum indicum) in Oman. Plant Disease. 2005;89(5):530.
  33. Martini M, Lee IM. PCR and RFLP analyses based on the ribosomal protein operon. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;938:173–188.
  34. Mall S, Chaturvedi Y, Rao GP, et al. Phytoplasma’s diversity in India. Bulletin of Insectology. 2011;64:(S77–S78):1721–8861.
  35. Martini M, Botti S, Marcone C, et al. Genetic variability among Flavescence dore´e phytoplasmas from different origins in Italy and France. Mol Cell Probes. 2002;16(3):197–208.
  36. Lee IM, Martini M, Bottner KD, et al. Ecological implications from a molecular analysis of phytoplasmas involved in an aster yellows epidemic in various crops in Texas. Phytopathology. 2003;93(1):1368–1377.
  37. Lee IM, Bottner KD, Munyaneza JE, et al. Clover proliferation group (16SrVI) subgroup A (16SrVI–A) phytoplasma is a probable causal agent of potato purple top disease in Washington and Oregon. Plant Disease. 2004;88(4):429.
  38. Lee IM, Bottner KD, Secor G, et al. ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma americanum’, a phytoplasma associated with a potato purple top wilt disease complex. International Journal of Systematic & Evolutionary Microbiology. 2006;56(11):1593–1597.
  39. Lee IM , Bottner–Parker KD, Zhao Y, et al. Phylogenetic analysis and delineation of phytoplasmas based on secY gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60(12):2887–2897.
  40. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13–15.
  41. Deng S, Hiruki C. Genetic relatedness between two non–culturable mycoplasmalike organisms revealed by nucleic acid hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. Phytopathology. 1991;81:1475–1479.
  42. Gundersen DE, Lee IM. Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested PCR assays using two universal primer pairs. Phytopathol Mediterreteria. 1996;35(3):144–151.
  43. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.
  44. Lee IM, Gundersen–Rindal DE, Davis RE, et al. Revised classification scheme of phytoplasmas based on RFLP analysis of 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein gene sequences. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1998;48:1153–1169.
  45. ZhaoY, Wei W, Lee IM, et al. Construction of an interactive online phytoplasma classification tool, iPhyClassifier, and its application in analysis of the peach X–disease phytoplasma group (16SrIII). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59(10):2582–2593.
  46. Galtier N, Gouy M, Gautier C. SEA VIEW and PHYLO WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996;12(6):543–548.
  47. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–2729.
  48. Saunders K, Stanley J. A nanovirus–like DNA component associated with yellow vein disease of Ageratum conyzoides: evidence for interfamilial recombination between plant DNA viruses. Virology. 1999;264(1):142–152.
  49. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2006;23(2):254–267.
  50. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, et al. RDP4: Detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evolution. 2015;1(1):vev003.
  51. C D Smart, B Schneider, C L Blomquist, et al. Phytoplasma specific PCR primers based on sequences of 16S–23SrRNA spacer region. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 1996;62(8):2988–2993.
  52. Wei W, Davis RE, Lee IM, et al. Computer–simulated RFLP analysis of 16S rRNA genes: identification of ten new phytoplasma groups. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57(8):1855–1867.
  53. Bertaccini A, Duduk B. Phytoplasma and Phytoplasma diseases:a new review of recent research. Phytopathol Mediterreria. 2009;48:355–378.
  54. Choopanya D. Mycoplasma like bodies associated with sesamum Phyllody in Thailand. Phytopathology. 1973;63:1536–1537.
  55. Klein M. Sesamum phyllody in Israel. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift. 1977;88(2):165–171.
  56. Pal BP, Pushkarnath P. Phyllody, a possible virus disease of sesamum. Indian Journal Agriculture Science. 1935;5:517–521.
  57. Khan MS, Raj SK, Snehi SK. First report of ‘Candidatus phytoplasma asteris’ affecting sesame cultivation in India. Journal Plant Pathology. 2007;89(2):301–305.
  58. Win NKK, Back CG, Jung HY. Phyllody Phytoplasma infecting Sesame (Sesamum indicum) in Myanmar. Tropical Plant Pathology. 2010;35(5):310–313.
  59. Akhtar KP, Dickinson M, Sawar G, et al. First report on the association of a 16Sr II Phytoplasma with sesame phyllody in Pakistan. Plant Pathology. 2008;57(4):771.
  60. Wei W, Lee IM, Davis RE, et al. Automated RFLP pattern comparison and similarity coefficient calculation for rapid delineation of new and distinct phytoplasma 16Sr subgroup lineages. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58(10):2368–2377.
  61. Domingo E, Holland JJ. RNA virus mutations and fitness for survival. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1997;51:151–178.
  62. Nishigawa H, Oshima K, Kakizawa S, et al. Evidence of intermolecular recombination between extrachromosomal DNAs in phytoplasma:a trigger for the biological diversity of phytoplasma. Microbiology. 2002;148(5):1389–1396.
  63. Pallavi MS, Ramappa HK, Shankarappa KS, et al. Detection and molecular characterization of phytoplasma associated with chickpea phyllody disease in south India. Phytoparasitica. 2012;40(3):279–286.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 :, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.