Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2469 - 2786

Bacteriology & Mycology: Open Access

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 2

Morphotaxonomy of endophytic fungi on Cissus quadrangularis from Amravati (MS) India

Suradkar KP, Hande DV

Department of Botany, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University Amravati, India

Correspondence: Joseph O Falkinham, Department of Biological Sciences, 1405 Perry Street, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0406, USA, Tel 15402315931, Fax 15402319307

Received: June 05, 2017 | Published: July 25, 2017

Citation: Suradkar KP, Hande DV. Morphotaxonomy of endophytic fungi on Cissus quadrangularis from Amravati (MS) India. J Bacteriol Mycol Open Access. 2017;5(2):253-258. DOI: 10.15406/jbmoa.2017.05.00127

Download PDF

Abstract

Endophytes play significant role to establish fungal diversity. The research interest has been increasing in ecology, biology and applications of endophytic fungi. It is believed that endophytic fungi are diverse in those areas where diversity of plants are diverse and certainly Melghat Forest is one among these areas which has huge plant diversity but studies on endophytic fungal diversity from this region extremely inadequate. In the present study widely used medicinal plant Cissus quadrangularis was investigated to isolate the endophytic fungi. Total eight endophytes were observed from different parts (stem, leaf and petiole) of the host by using standard methods. For the specific identification of species; morphological charchacters and dimensions of various fruiting bodies were studied microscopically.

Key words: taxonomy, fungal endophytes

Introduction

The word ‘endophyte’ means “inside the plant” (endon Gr.=within, phyton=plant) and term was coined by De Bary in 1866 to define all microbes (including fungi, bacteria, cyanobacteria and actinomycetes) that reside within plant tissue.

The association between fungal endophytes and host plants may be symbiotic or antagonistic or slightly pathogenic in nature.1 Major impact of endophytes is observed on ecology, distribution and physiology along with immunity of plants. Almost all the plant species (~400,000) harbour one or more endophytic organisms.2 To date, only a few plants have been extensively investigated for their endophytic biodiversity and their potential to produce bioactive secondary metabolites. It is, therefore, important to determine endophytic biodiversity of medicinal plants. Identification, taxonomic position and mapping of fungi are challenging tasks. Out of many fungi about 70,000 fungal species had been isolated, identified and characterized.3,4 Manoharachary et al.,5 are of the opinion that about 27,000 fungal species have been described in India. Scientific community is continuously striving to search into the diversity of fungi and their natural potentials. The multiplicity of endophytic fungi and their role in various biochemical processes occupy most important place in the biological world and India has been the cradle for such fungi.

During mycological investigation of Melghat Forest of Amravati District several author collected and reported many rare and interesting fungal forms they are new to Maharashtra.6–12 The traditional taxonomy of fungi is based on morphological features like shape, size and colour of various fruiting bodies.13 In the present study isolated fungal species were also identified morphotaxonomicaly by studying their macroscopic and microscopic characteristics.

Materials and methods

Collection of plant samples

The plant samples were collected from Melghat forest of Amravati district. The samples were collected in sterilized polythene bags. The collected samples were brought to the laboratory and processed within 24hrs of collection.

Isolation of the endophytic fungi

Surface sterilization were done according to the method described by Suryanrayanan14 (Table 1) to remove the epiphytes. The surface sterilized explants then inoculated at 26±2°C into the Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA). The plates were periodically observed for fungal growth.

Chemicals

Concentration

Time

Ethanol

70%

1 min

SDW

-

3 min × 4 times

NaOCl

4%

30 sec

SDW

-

3 min × 4 times

Ethanol

70%

30 sec

SDW

-

3 min × 4 times

Table 1 Surface sterilization of explants
SDW: Sterile Distilled Water; NaOCl: Sodium Hypochlorite

Microscopic observation

Permanent slides were prepared from pure colonies of isolated endophytic fungi. Morphological characters such as pycnidia, conidia and condiogenous cells (Coelomycetes); conidia and conidiophores (Hyphomycetes) were studied under Carl Zeiss, Trinocular Research Microscope (Axioscope-A-1) with magnification of 5x, 10x, 40x and 100x.

Mountants and stain

In the present study microscopic observation of isolated endophytic fungi was initially done in water mountant. However, various fruiting structures were observed by mounting in lactophenol-cotton blue. This stain-cum-mounting medium has been used for different taxonomic groups of fungi.15,16

Identification of endophytic fungi

All the endophytic isolates were identified morphologically and placed in appropriate genera and species of fungi using standard taxonomic keys and monographs17–21 were referred for identification of endophytes.

Observations and results

Arthrinium hydei Crous and Groenewald (Plate I, Figure 1)

Mycelium smooth, hyaline to pale brown, branched, septate, 2-3μm diameter. Conidiophores pale brown smooth, cylindrical, septate, branched, 22-34×3-5μm. Conidiogenous cell aggregated in clusters on hyphae, smooth, hyaline, doliiform. Conidia unicelled, brown, globose to lenticular with pale equatorial slit 10-22μm diameter in side view.

Figure 1 Mycelium with conidia of A. hydei.

Remark: The species under study matched with A. hydei, and new to this region. A. hydei was isolated and cultured on PDA. Colonies developed were olive white with patches of grey to black.

Arthrinium phaeospermum (Corda) Ellis (Plate I, Figure 2)

Colonies dark brown to greenish, round, oval or irregular in shape. Mycelium hyaline to pale brown, smooth hyphae, 3-4μm in diameter. Conidiophores are cylindrical, narrow, erect or flexuous, straight, simple, smooth, hyaline 5-12×3-5μm thick, dark brown with transverse septa 48-120μm long,2-4.5μm in diameter between septa, basal cell somewhat flattened and round or irregular in shape. Conidia sessile or sometimes borne on short hyaline pegs along the sides of the conidiophores, which are somewhat flattened, lemon shape in surface view, triangular in side view but outer edge is curve and the corners round, brown pale at tips, smooth 10-16μm long,4-7μm wide in surface view.

Remark: Isolated specie cultured on PDA. The colonies were dark brown to greenish in color, round, oval and irregular in shape (Table 2).

Figure 2 Mycelium with conidia of A. phaeospermum.

Dense mycelial growth on PDA, colonies with uniform edges, color ranges from dark purple red to green brown in PDA. Sporodochia develop after approximately after 20days on PDA. Sporodochia powdery, brownish to grey black in color. Mycelium hyaline, smooth, septate, brown on maturation. Short conidiophores originated on hyphae in clusters. These conidiophores branched repeatedly and are visible as dense masses. Conidiophore hyaline, claviform, 1-3 septate, smooth up to 9-11μm, producing a single dark gangliospore terminally. Young conidia rounded, non septate and pale in color. Mature gangliospore golden brown or brown or olivaceous or black, 40 globosed or pyriform or sometimes of irregular angular shape, septate, muriform, verrucose, 15-54μm in diameter. Mature conidia contain multiple transverse and vertical septa.

Species

Colony Character(color)

Conidiophores

Conidia

A. caricicola Kunze ex Fries

Black, pulvinate

150 µm ×4 µm

36- 54 µm ×9-12 µm

A. hydei Crous

Olive white with patches of grey to black

21.65-33.22 µm × 3.2-4.8 µm

10-22 µm

A. marii Larrondo and Calvo

Whitish- black to olivaceous grey

6-10× 2.5×4 μm

7-10 μm

A. phaeospermum (Corda) Ellis

Dark brown to greenish in color

4.7-11.6 µm ×2.8-5.1 µm

10-16 µm ×3.9-7.2 µm

Table 2 Comparison between species of Arthrnium

Figure 3 Mycelium with conidia of E. nigrum.

Remark: The characters of the specimen understudy were allied with Epicoccum nigrum, hence assigned to the said species (Table 3).

Species

Colony character (color)

Conidiophores

Conidia

Epicoccum andropogonis (Ces) Schol- Schwarz

Greyish black sometime radish grey

9×12 µm

22-28 µm

Epicoccum nigrum Ehrenb.Ex.Schlecht.

Dark purple red to green brown

8-11.5 µm

14.5-53.9 µm

Table 3 Comparison between species of Epicoccum
Epicoccum nigrum Ehrenb.Ex.Schlecht. (Plate I, Figure 3)

Nigrospora oryzae (Berk & Br.) Petch. (Plate I, Figure 4)

Figure 4 Mycelium with conidia of N. oryzae.

Mycelium septate, branched, brown in colour. Conidiophore short, ampiliform, somewhat brown in colour, bearing single conidium at the tip. Conidia borne singly at the tip of the 113 conidiophores, globose or somewhat flattened, absolutely opaque black, with hyaline membrane on the upper side 24-28×21-24μm.

Remark: The species understudy found to be similar morphologically with Nigrospora oryzae (Table 4).

Species

Colony Character (color)

Conidiophores

Conidia

Nigrospora oryzae (Berk & Br) Petch.

Brown

Short, ampiliform

24-28 µm ×21-24 µm

Nigrospora panici Zimm.

Yellowish

Short, slightly inflated

25-30 µm × 22-25 µm

Nigrospora padwickii Prasad, Agnihotri and Agarwal

Pale brown

Short, swollen below apex

33.5-41.8µm ×31.8-40.2 µm

Table 4 Comparison between species of Nigrospora
Nigrospora oryzae(Berk & Br) Petch (Plate I, Figure 4)

Pestalotiopsis funerea (Plate I, Figure 5)

Pustules black, punctiform, globose-lenticular, 110-290μm in dimeter. Conidia broad, tapering towards the base, clavate-fusoid, straight,5-celled, 15.5-28.5×6.6-9.2μm, intermediate coloured cells guttalate, umber or olivaceous, equally coloured, lowest coloured cell sometimes slightly paler, slightly constricted at septa, apical appendages 1-2,4.8-6.5μm.

Figure 5 Mycelium with conidia of P. funereal.

Remark: On comparison with known species, the present specie proved to be P. funerea (Table 5).

Species

Colony Character(color)

Apical Appendages

Conidia

Pestalotiopsis funerea Stey.

Dark brown

2-Jan

15.5-28.5 ×6.6-9.2 µm

Pestalotiopsis guepinii (Desm) Stey.

Olivaceous brown

3-Jan

12-15µm × 5.5-6.6 µm

Pestalotiopsis maculans (Corda) Nag Raj

Pale brown to moderate brown

3-Feb

10-15.5 µm

Table 5 Comparison between species of Pestalotiopsis
Pestalotiopsis funerea Stey. (Plate I, Figure 5)

Pithomyces chartarum (Berk and Curtis) Ellis (Plate I, Figure 6)

Figure 6 Mycelium with conidia of P. chartarum.

Colonies effused faint yellow, olive-green, shiny. Mycelium composed of a network of brown, mooth or rough walled hyphae. Conidiophores short peg like, 2-4μm wide, arising laterally on hyphae, subhyaline. Conidia produced singly as blunt out ends at the apex of conidiophores, oval, elliptical, obovoid, pale brown at young stage, dark brown at mature stage and often one or more oblique or longitudinal septa,21-32μmlong,12-35μm wide, each conidium carrying away a part of conidiophores.

Remark: The specimen shows similar characters with Pithomyces chartarum, hence assigned to the said species (Table 6).

Species

Colony Character(color)

Conidiophores

Conidia

Pithomyces chartarum (Berk and Curtis) Ellis

Olive-green

1.8-3.9µm

20.6-31.8 µm × 11.7-34.9µm

Pithomyces atro-olivaceous (Cooke & Harkn) Ellis

Dark olivaceous brown

1-5µm × 1-3 µm

15-35µm × 7-10 µm

Pithomyces flavus Berk.& Br.

At first yellow to olive green later dark olivaceous

2-5 µm × 1.5-2 µm

28-45 µm × 15-26 µm

Table 6 Comparison between species of Pithomyces
Pithomyces chartarum(Berk and Curtis) Ellis (Plate I, Figure 6) 

Stachybotrys nilgirica (Plate I, Figure 7)

Mycelium composed of creeping hyaline or pale colored, branched hyphae. Conidiophores (phialophores) scattered on substratum, erect, straight, hyaline, slightly narrow above, 2-3 septate (septa 21.28-39.9μm apart), swollen at base,68.7-93.1μm long smooth, terminating in a cluster of about 6-7 phialides, apical cell of philophore 13.3-17μm long and 2-6μm wide and subhyaline. When young pale olive green, at maturity conidia borne singly acrogenously at the tip of phialides, 1-celled, globose, tuberculate, dark greenish black 15.3-27.8μm in diameter.

Remark: The characters of the species understudy were allied with S. Nilgirica (Table 7).

Figure 7 Mycelium with conidia of S. nilgirica.

Species

Colony characters

Conidiophore

Phialides

Conidia

S. chartarum (Ehrenb.) Hughes

Colorless or whitish then becoming black

64-109 µm ×5 µm

11-19 µm ×4.5-6.5 µm

15-16.5 µm × 3.2-7.3 µm.

S. chlorohalonata Andersen and Thrane

Colonies thick dark black coloured

73-91 µm × 13-16 µm

11-16 µm ×   4-6 µm

11-16 µm ×4-6 µm

S. nilgirica Subram.

Black

68.7 µm -93.1 µm

13.3-17 µm × 2-6 µm

15.3 µm -27.9 µm

Table 7 Comparison between species of Stachybotrys
Stachybotrys nilgiricaSubram. (Plate I, Figure 7)

Trimmatostroma hughesii Rao and Subhedar (Plate I, Figure 8)

Colony olivaceous, brown, conidiophores macronematous, septate, sporogenous cell bears on top of conidiophores, 40- 156μm long and 4-7μm wide. Conidiophores simple, sptate, hyaline. Conidia small, simple, catenulate, only one longitudinal septa over single transverse septa, 6-11μm×4-9μm.

Remark: Characters of the present specimen match with Trimmatostroma hughesii, hence assigned to the same (Table 8).

Figure 8 Mycelium with conidia of T. hughesii.

Species

Colony character(color)

Conidiophores

Conidia

Trimmatostroma eriodictyonis (Dearn. and Barthol) Ellis

Dark brown

45-68 µm

18- 57 µm ×5- 26 µm

Trimmatostroma hughesii Rao and Subhedar

Olivaceous, brown

39.6- 155.7 µm × 3.8-7.2 µm

6.2-11.4 µm × 3.9-8.8 µm

Trimmatostroma scutellare (Berk and Br.) Ellis

Pale brown to moderate brown

30-50 µm long, 2-4 µm

13.5-32.3µm × 29-39.5

Table 8 Comparison between species of Trimmatostroma
Trimmatostroma hughesiiRao and Subhedar (Plate I, Figure 8)

Discussion

Medicinal plants are reported as great reservoir of endophytes.22 One to several fungi could be isolated from single host.23 In the present study total eight endophytic fungi were isolated from single host. Previous study proved that out of the total groups of fungi, anamorphic fungi are prevalent as endophytes in the plants screened throughout the world.24–26 The fungi found in the present investigation also showed dominance of anamorphic fungi.

Taxonomy is the discipline of classifications i.e. the assemblage of organisms into definite category (taxa). Morphological characters are very much useful in the field of taxonomy to give the special identity to the organism. In the fungal taxonomy morphological as well as microscopical characters play an important role to identify them. Colony morphology, type of hypha, spore and reproduction are characteristics which can used to identify the fungi.

Arthrinium genus observing similarities in all the two species studied and some specific differences in structure and colour etc of conidia, the investigator through same may assist in finding morphological differences. Conidiogenesis is particularly interesting. Conidiogenous cells tend to be dolliform to subcylindrical, pale brown with clear periclinal thickening. On further development these cells become ampulliform, with a prominent elongated neck. The neck can terminate in conidia either sympodially or in some species percurrently while in others with annelation etc. One must note that variation in conidiogenesis makes it difficult to compare these characters among taxa, as conidiophores can either be hyphae with lateral loci or be reduced to dolliform conidiogenous cells. Conidial ontogeny is holobastic. The apical holoblastic conidium, initially spherical, changes to lenticular.27 When conidium matures the neck of the conidiophores becomes narrower and a circular breaking can be seen on the outer wall conidiophores (this is initial of basauxic growth). This holoblastic nature and sizes of conidia vary as per species. The conidia of Arthrinium can develop a spontaneous break of the wall, thus, releasing protoplasmic contents.

Epicoccum nigrumis an anamorphic ascomycete distributed globally which colonizes on different types of soil and different host plants. Morpho-cultural characters make two groups of E. nigrum. The first group is showing yellow to orange mycelium while second group shows grey, pink, red or brown mycelium28,29 in her classic paper stated that large difference in pigmentation; spore-size and other morphological features, together with frequent sectorizations in culture plates indicate that E. nigrum has variable species.

In present study Stachybotrys nilgirica wasidentified by comparing their characteristics with other species. The conidia of S. chartarum and S. chlorohalonata are ellipsoidal to oval while conidia of S. nilgirica are circular and small. The conidial wall of S. chartarum is smooth, while conidial wall in S. chlorohalonata is rough but wall of conidia of S. nilgirica is verrucose to tuberculate.30

Morphology of Trimmatostroma shows variation in size of conidia T. scutellare showed moderate brown to dark brown colony, mycelium subhyaline, conidiophore irregularly branched, septate, conidia obovate to subglobose, multicellular, dark brown.17,31 Trimmatostroma hughesii showed colony olivaceous, brown, conidiophores macronematous, septate, sporogenous cell bears on top of conidiophores, 40-156μm long and 4-7μm wide. Conidiophores simple, septate, hyaline. Conidia small, simple, catenulate, only one longitudinal septa over single transverse septa, 6-11μm×4-9μm.32–34 The conidia of Trimmatostroma hughesii small, catenulate and only one longitudinal septa over single transverse septa is present while in Trimmatostroma scutellare having conidia large, with many cross and longitudinal septation.

Conclusion

The present investigation aims to study basic taxonomic study of endophytic fungi from Cissus quadrangularis from Melghat Forest of Amravati district of Maharashtra. Study concluded that several endophytes can associated with single host. The present findings reported first time from this region.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Principal, Shri Shivaji Science College, and Amravati for providing all necessary laboratory facilities.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arnold AE, Henk DA, Eells RA, et al. Diversity and phylogenetic affinities of foliar fungal endophytes in loblolly pine inferred by culturing and environmental pcr. Mycologia. 2007;99(2):185–206.
  2. Tan RX, Zou WX. Endophytes: a rich source of functional metabolites. Nat Prod Rep. 2001;18(4):448–459.
  3. Hawksworth DL. The fungal dimension of biodiversity: the 1.5million species estimate revisited. Mycol Res. 1991;105:1422–142.
  4. Hawksworth DL, Rossman A. Where are all the undescribed fungi? Phytopathology. 1997;87(9):888–891.
  5. Manoharachary C, Sridhar K, Singh R, et al. () Fungal biodiversity: Distribution, conservation and prospecting of fungi from India. Current sci. 2005;89(1):58–71.
  6. Dharkar NS, Hande DV, Subhedar AW. Some new species of Pleosporales from India. J Mycol Pl Pathol. 2006;36(1):28–30.
  7.  Hande DV. Dematiatious Hyphomycetes Fungi From Amravati MS. Journal of Ecobiotechnology. 2012;4(2):172–174.
  8. Subhedar AW, Hande DV, Dharkar NS, et al. Two new fungal species from Vidarbha India. J Mycol Pl Pathol. 2010;40(2):235–236.
  9. Shahezad MA, Hande DV, Dharkar NS. Dinemasporium maximaum–Appendage Bearing Coelomycete From Vidarbha (MS). J Mycol Pl Pathol. 2011;41(2):246–248.
  10. Hande DV, Hiwarale SV. Diversity of XylariaSpecies from Amravati Region, Amravati, MS, India. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences. 2013;2(1):67–69.
  11. Hande DV, Kadu SR, Suradkar KP. Dictyoartrinium anmorphic fungi from Amravati region (MS) India. Int J of life Sciences. 2013;1(4):328–329.
  12. Hande DV, Suradkar KP, Kadu SR. A Rare Myxomycetes Macbrideola from Amravati, Maharashtra. Int J of life Sciences. 2014;2(1):93–95.
  13. Hawksworth DL, Sutton BC, Ainsworth GC. Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. 7th ed. UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute; 1983. 445 p.
  14. Suryanrayanan TS, Kumaresan V, Johnson JA. Fungal endophytes: The tropical dimension. In: Misra JK, Horn BW, editors. Trichomycetes and other fungal groups. USA: Science Publishers Inc Enfield NH; 2001. p. 197–207.
  15. Hawksworth DL. Mycologists’s handbook. UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute publications; 1974.
  16. Purvis MJRHS, Caller DC, Walls D. Laboratory Techniques in Botany. UK: Butterworth and Co Ltd; 1966.
  17. Ellis MB. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute; 1971. 608 p.
  18. Rao VG, Subhedar AW. An undescribed species of Trimmatostrma. Mycopathologia. 1976;58(2):79–870.
  19. Sutton BC. The Coelomycetes, Fungi Imperfecti with pycnidia Acervuli and Stromata. UK: Robert Mac Lechose and Co Ltd, University of Glasgow; 1980. 696 p.
  20. Subramanian CV. Hyphomycetes. India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 1971. p. 1–930.
  21. Barnett HL, Hunter BB. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi. USA: Burgess Publishing Company; 1972. 240 p.
  22. Strobel GA. Rainforest endophytes and bioactive products. Critical Review in Biotechnology. 2002;22(4):315–333.
  23. Petrini O. Taxonomy of endophytic fungi of aerial plant tissues. In: Fokkema NJ, Van Den Heuvel J, editors. Microbiology of the Phyllosphere. UK: Cambridge University Press; 1986. p. 175–187.
  24. Bussaban B, Lumyong S, Lumyong P, et al. Two new species of endophytes (ascomycetes) from Zingiberaceae. Nova Hedwigia. 2001;73:487–493.
  25. Suryanarayanan TS, Murali TS, Venkatesan G. Ouccurance and distribution of fungal endophytes in tropical forests across a rain fall gradient. Can J Bot. 2002;80(8):818–826.
  26. Gond SK, Verma VC, Kumar A, et al. Study of endophytic fungal community from different parts of Aeglemarmelos Correae (Rutaceae) from Varanasi (India). World J Microb Biotechnol. 2007;23(10):1371–1375.
  27. Cole GT, Samson RA. Patterns of development in conidial fungi. UK: Pitman Press; 1979. 190 p.
  28. Favaro LC, de Melo FL, Aguilar–Vildoso CI, et al. Polyphasic Analysis of Intraspecific Diversity in Epicoccumnigrum Warrants Reclassification into Separate Species. Plos One. 2011;6(8):e14828.
  29. Schol–Schwarz MB. The genus Epicoccum. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1959;42:149– 173.
  30. Morgan–Jones G, Sinclair RC. Notes on Hyphomycetes. Xxxiii. Stachybotrys sphaerospora sp.nov. from South Africa. Mycotaxon. 1980;10:372– 374.
  31. Sutton BC, Ganapathi A. Trimmatostroma excentricum sp. nov., on Eucalyptus from New Zealand andFiji. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 1978;16(4):529–533.
  32. Crous PW, Braun U, Hunter GC, et al. () Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocercospora. Studies in Mycology. 2013;75(1):37–114.
  33. De Bary A. Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze, Flechten, und Myxomyceten. Germany: Hofmeister’s Handbook of Physiological Botany; 1866:2.
  34. Ellis MB. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. VI. Mycological Papers. 1965;103:1–46.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Suradkar, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.